considering the ways that'... the idea of Indian-ness worked variously to train territorial expansion and to supplement and stabilize both corporate and individual articulations of national manhood'. Chapter three analyzes Samuel G. Morton's debate with John Bachman over polygenesis, skilfully linking the construction of race to'.. . professional competition for cultural authority on behalf of manhood'. Chapter four discusses the emergence of professional gynaecology, arguing that it worked hand in hand with nineteenth-century racial science '. . . in their mutually reassuring stabilization of manhood and professional masculinity'. Nelson crafts, in short, a neat and perhaps too schematic symmetry between the construction of white, middle-class professional men and their relationship to various 'others': Native Americans, blacks, women. Nelson's study concludes with an excavation of the political psychology of middle-class and professional fraternal rituals, which, she charges, reveal the high human costs of pursuing the national ideal of manhood. Nelson's scholarship is adventurous, her arguments provocative, even when the historical basis for her claims seems somewhat suspect. Her critique of 'white manhood', for example, seems posited on the belief that this historical process somehow foreclosed or short-circuited '... nascently radical, local democratic practices, energies, and imaginings, not replacing local manhoods so much as enlisting them for and orienting them toward a unified, homogeneous national ideal'. She returns to this issue in her Afterward, an extended discussion and critique of 'presidentialism', a term she uses to signify the ways in which Americans invest their hopes for American life in a single, paternal figure rather than investing their energies in pursuing alternative and messier democratic practices. In her introduction, Dana Nelson announces: 'I want National Manhood to disturb the concrete referentiality of that term white man, bumping aside the abstraction in ways that let us begin considering the profound diversity of people who fit that label....' She certainly succeeds in bumping the term around and, like Jacobson, she offers a graphic portrait of the social and pyschological havoc it has left in its wake. If the utopian desires for a different America, freed from the shadows of its racial history, are ever to be achieved, works such as these will play an important part in helping readers to imagine that future.