Arthroscopic Group Research Articles

Outcomes of surgical management of Palmer type IB triangular fibrocartilage complex injuries

Palmer type IB triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) is one of the most common causes of ulnar wrist pain. The primary surgical treatment for these lesions is open and wrist arthroscopic technique to repair TFCC. This study was carried out to describe the result of both techniques in the treatment of type IB TFCC injuries. A retrospective study was carried out on 18 patients with surgical treatment at the Hospital of Traumatology and Orthopaedics of Ho Chi Minh City from 2019 to 2021. Results showed that there were 13 female patients with a mean age of 34.8±8.1 years old, and 5 male patients with a mean age of 19.4±2.3 years old. Of which, 10 patients underwent arthroscopic surgery, accounting for 55.6%, and 8 underwent open surgery, accounting for 44.4%. The mean follow-up time of the arthroscopic group was 17.6±9.7 months, and in the open surgery group was 18.8±4.6 months. The mean visual analog scale (VAS) score in the arthroscopic group was 1.3±1.8, and in the open surgery group was 0.62±0.74 at the time of final follow-up. The arthroscopic group had an average score of 83±15.1, and the open surgery group was 88.1±8.4 on the Mayo modified wrist score (p>0.05). In all cases, there were 8 excellent cases, 6 good cases, 3 satisfactory cases and 1 poor case. The common complications in the arthroscopic group were ulnar nerve injuries in 2 cases and a prominent suture knot in 2 cases, followed by extensor carpi ulnar tendonitis in 1 case. In the open surgery group, there were 2 cases of prominent suture knots and 1 case of pin infection. In conclusion, both techniques of treating Palmer IB TFCC injuries gave similar good results, the choice of method depends on the surgeon’s reference. However, the risk of ulnar nerve injury was higher in the arthroscopic group.

Improved Outcome With Knee Arthroscopy Relative to Physiotherapy for Symptomatic Unstable Meniscal Tears: 2-Year Prospective Cohort Study.

Although preservation of meniscal tissue is paramount, there are occasions when repair of a torn meniscus is not possible. The surgical option may be a partial meniscectomy, the objective being to alleviate the patient's symptoms with resection of only that portion of the meniscus that is no longer functioning but is the cause of symptoms. Previous studies have questioned the need to perform such surgery and have recommended nonoperative treatment instead. Our goal was to compare the outcome of partial meniscectomy with that of physiotherapy alone for irreparable meniscal tears. Clinical outcome following arthroscopic partial meniscectomy may differ from that following physiotherapy alone, for patients with symptomatic irreparable meniscal tears. Nonrandomized prospective cohort study. Level 2. Patients satisfying the inclusion criteria chose to undergo knee arthroscopy (group A) or physiotherapy (group B). The diagnosis of a meniscal tear was made on physical assessment and magnetic resonance imaging examination. The meniscal tear was preventing them from continuing with their regular weightbearing exercise. Outcomes of interest were the following patient-reported outcomes (PROs): the Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Tegner Activity Score (TAS), with minimal clinically important differences being 10 and 1, respectively. PROs were completed at baseline, and at 1-year and 2-year follow-up. Changes in scores within and between groups were compared using analysis of variance and Wilcoxon tests (P <0.05). A power analysis demanded 65 patients in each group to produce a power of 80% and a P value of 5%. Of 528 patients enrolled in the study, 10 were lost to follow-up and 8 were excluded. Data were complete for 269 in group A, and 228 in Group B. Group A and B were similar in terms of age (41.1 years, SD 7.8 vs 40 years, SD 13.3), body mass index (22.5 kg/m2, SD 3.1 vs 23.1 kg/m2, SD 2.3), radiographic grade of osteoarthritis (median grade 2, range 0-3 in both groups), gender (male:female = 134:135 vs 112:116), and duration of symptoms (44.4 days, SD 5.6 vs 46.6 days, SD 8.8), with P >0.05. At both 1-year and 2-year follow-up, Group A had higher scores in the mean total KOOS (88.8, SD 8.0 vs 72.4, SD 3.8), as well as in all subscales within the KOOS, and the TAS (median 7, range 5-9 vs median 5, range 3-6), with P <0.001 for each variable. Performing a knee arthroscopy with partial meniscectomy is associated with improved KOOS and TAS, relative to treatment with physiotherapy alone, at 2-year follow-up. Physically active patients with symptomatic irreparable meniscal tears may experience a better clinical outcome following knee arthroscopy, relative to to physiotherapy alone.

Evaluation of Arthroscopic Bankart Repair and Open Latarjet Technique for Treatment of Recurrent Shoulder Dislocation

Background: Arthroscopic Bankart repair and open Latarjet procedures are the most frequent surgical treatments for shoulder instability and recurrent shoulder dislocation. Objectives: Therefore, we performed research to assess the clinical outcomes and recurrence rate of instability between both Arthroscopic Bankart repair and open Latarjet techniques. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed at Lahore General Hospital, Lahore from 2021-23, comprising 74 patients, managed surgically for the condition of recurrent shoulder dislocation. The patients were allocated into two groups viz Group A and B comprising 37 patients in each, who were managed through Arthroscopic Bankart repair and open Latarjet techniques, respectively. Post-operative complications, re-occurrence and success rate were measured in terms of SSV scores. Results: Average age of patients in Arthroscopic Bankart group was 28.34+5.31 years while in open Latarjet group; it was 29.09+6.19 years. 14 (37.83%) patients of Arthroscopic Bankart repair group revealed recurrent shoulder dislocation, while no such complaint was found in the open Latarjet technique. Twenty-seven patients of Arthroscopic Bankart group showed satisfaction with the procedure and 33 out of 37 patients (89.18%) were satisfied with open Latarjet technique. Patients in open Latarjet technique group showed successful recovery of shoulder dislocation and their SSV was 87.91%, while the patients in Arthroscopic Bankart repair group showed less SSV score of 59.76%. Conclusion: Open Latarjet group patients had a greater rate of functional satisfaction, while the arthroscopic Bankart repair group showed a trend for more recurrence. Open Latarjet operation had a higher success rate and patients had a better rate of return to previous top-level sports than Arthroscopic Bankart technique. Keywords: Latarjet; Re-occurrence; Shoulder dislocation; Sports medicine; Surgical complications.

Management of acute periprosthetic knee infection: a comparison of arthroscopic and open debridement

IntroductionIn acute periprosthetic knee infections, debridement and implant retention (DAIR) is the preferred treatment prior to one- and two-stage revisions. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of arthroscopic and open debridement of infected primary total knee arthroplasties (TKA).Material and methodsWe analyzed clinical, laboratory, and antibiotic treatment data, collected in patients with periprosthetic knee infection treated with DAIR at a Swiss Level 1 orthopedic and trauma center over a 10-year period between January 2005 and May 2015. Inclusion criteria were primary total knee arthroplasty and early postoperative or acute hematogenous periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The primary endpoint was the need for further revision surgery due to persistent infection. The secondary endpoint was the prosthesis salvage in further infection surgeries.ResultsForty-two patients with 44 acute or hematogenous periprosthetic knee infections were included. We recorded 20 recurrent infections (45%) in our study population: 10 (77%) out of 13 in the arthroscopic DAIR group and 10 (32%) out of 31 in the open DAIR group. Two-stage revision, meaning complete removal of the TKA, insertion of a spacer and replantation at a second stage, had to be performed in three patients treated initially arthroscopically (23%) and in six patients treated initially with an open surgical procedure (21%).ConclusionsOpen debridement for acute periprosthetic knee infection shows clear benefits in terms of infection eradication and prosthesis salvage compared to arthroscopic DAIR.

Open procedure vs. arthroscopic débridement for chronic medial epicondylitis.

This retrospective study compared the outcomes after open and arthroscopic treatment of chronic medial epicondylitis (ME). The study included 44 elbows in 38 patients: 25 (29-72 years) in the open group and 19 (27-70 years) in the arthroscopy group. The indications for ME surgery were failed conservative therapy for more than 3 months, symptom duration exceeding 6 months, and persistent severe pain. We used radiography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging assessments. The clinical assessment included operating time, range of motion, grip strength, visual analog scale (VAS) score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, and complications. The mean follow-up was 20.2 (12-58) months. The mean operating time was significantly longer in the arthroscopy group (32.5 vs. 23.5 minutes; P=.029). In both groups, all outcome measures improved significantly after surgery and there were no significant differences between the DASH scores (preoperative 44.8 vs. 43.9, postoperative 12.5 vs. 13.2), grip strength (preoperative 72.2 vs. 66.8, postoperative 84.8 vs. 83.6), and VAS scores (preoperative 8.5 vs. 8.2, postoperative 1.0 vs. 1.1) in the open and arthroscopy groups. The outcomes were excellent or good in 20 patients (80%) in the open group and 16 (84%) in the arthroscopy group. The only complication was 1 case of transient ulnar neuropathy in the open group. Open and arthroscopic techniques were very effective and comparable for treating chronic ME. The surgeon can choose either technique for treating chronic ME.

Mid-term effectiveness of arthroscopy and conservative treatment for symptomatic discoid lateral meniscus in middle-aged and elderly patients

To compare the mid-term effectiveness of arthroscopy versus conservative treatment on symptomatic discoid lateral meniscus (SDLM) in middle-aged and elderly patients. The clinical data of 118 middle-aged and elderly patients (154 knees) with SDLM who received arthroscopy or conservative treatment between June 2014 and May 2016 were retrospectively analyzed, including 76 patients (96 knees) in the arthroscopy group (group A) and 42 patients (58 knees) in the conservative treatment group (group B). There was no significant difference in age, gender, and body mass index between the two groups (P>0.05). Compared with group B, the symptoms duration in group A was longer, the incidences of discoid lateral meniscus injury and mechanical symptoms were higher, and the visual analogue scale (VAS) score and Lysholm score before treatment were worse, with significant differences (P<0.05). VAS score and Lysholm score before and after treatment were recorded and compared. The patients in both groups were followed up 60-74 months, with an average of 66.3 months. The follow-up time of group A and group B was (65.9±3.5) months and (67.0±4.0) months respectively, with no significant difference (t=-1.615, P=0.109). At last follow-up, in either group A or group B, the VAS score and Lysholm score significantly improved when compared with those before treatment (P<0.05). The differences of VAS score and Lysholm score in group A before and after treatment were significantly better than those in group B (P<0.05). Arthroscopy and conservative treatment have a satisfactory mid-term effectiveness on SDLM in middle-aged and elderly patients. However, the improvement of symptoms and function of arthroscopy was significantly better than that of conservative treatment. For middle-aged and elderly SDLM patients with invalidated conventional treatment for 6 months, severe clinical symptoms, long duration of symptoms, and combined with mechanical symptoms, arthroscopy should be given priority even if they are complicated with early osteoarthritis.

Comparison of arthroscopic debridement and microfracture in the treatment of osteochondral lesion of talus.

This study was performed to compare the clinical effect of arthroscopic debridement vs. arthroscopic microfracture in the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus. We retrospectively reviewed patients with osteochondral lesion of talus who were admitted to our hospital from April 2020 to April 2021. The patients were divided into Group A (arthroscopic debridement group, n = 39) and Group B (arthroscopic microfracture group, n = 42), and the intraoperative details in the two groups were analyzed. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score and visual analogue scale (VAS) score were compared between the two groups before surgery and at the last follow-up. The postoperative AOFAS score (Group A, 40.9-82.26; Group B, 38.12-87.38), VAS score (Group A, 6.44-3.92; Group B, 6.38-2.05) significantly improved in both groups, but the improvement was significantly greater in Group B than in Group A (P < 0.05). Among all patients, the AOFAS and VAS scores of men aged ≤30 years and patients with a low body mass index (BMI) improved more significantly (P < 0.05). The arthroscopic microfracture for the treatment of osteochondral lesion of talus is superior to joint debridement in terms of improving ankle function, especially in relatively young men with a relatively low BMI.

The effect of subacromial decompression on the curative effect of arthroscopic treatment of shoulder calcific tendinitis.

To observe and analyze the surgical efficacy of arthroscopic debridement of calcified deposits and arthroscopic debridement combined with subacromial decompression in patients with supraspinatus tendon calcific myositis. To observe the effect of Subacromial decompression on the efficacy of arthroscopic treatment of shoulder calcific tendinitis. From 2016 to 2021, 48 cases of shoulder arthroscopic debridement due to supraspinatus calcific tendinitis met the inclusion criteria and were included, with 24 cases assigned to the arthroscopic debridement group and 24 cases to the arthroscopic debridement combined with subacromial decompression group. Changes between preoperative and postoperative shoulder pain and shoulder function were statistically analyzed. The 24 patients in the arthroscopic debridement group were better than the arthroscopic debridement combined with subacromial decompression group in terms of short-term postoperative shoulder pain and shoulder joint function recovery (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the postoperative long-term shoulder pain and shoulder function recovery between the two groups (P > 0.05). Compared with arthroscopic debridement combined with subacromial decompression, arthroscopic debridement alone is a better surgical option for the treatment of calcific tendinitis.

Low-dose prophylaxis protocol for heterotopic ossification after hip preservation surgery in a sport participants cohort.

Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a well-known complication of arthroscopic and open surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Incidence of heterotopic ossification has been reported in the literature between 0% and 44% after hip arthroscopy and between 18.2% and 25% after anterior mini-open surgery. Currently, pharmacological prophylaxis with NSAIDs and selective COX-2 inhibitors are commonly used and their effectiveness is well documented in literature. We hypothesized that the low-dose prophylaxis protocol with selective cox-2 inhibitors decreases the risk of heterotopic ossification in open or arthroscopic hip preservation surgery in athletes. This study is an analysis of prospectively gathered data on 98 sport participant patients who underwent arthroscopic or anterior mini-open treatment for FAI between April 2008 and April 2018. All the patients received postoperative oral prophylaxis with 60mg etoricoxib once daily for two weeks. Post-operative X-rays were performed at 1, 3, and 12 months after surgery and reviewed by two orthopedic surgeons blinded to the type and side of surgery. HO were graded according to the Brooker classification. Descriptive statistics was used to analyze demographic data. Bivariate analysis was performed to analyze the association of HO with each of the following variables: type of surgery, physical activity, time of evolution of symptoms, age at surgery, and sex. Finally, a regression model analysis was performed to determine the presence of confounding effects between variables. The study cohort was composed of 54 patients in the arthroscopic treatment group and 44 patients in the anterior mini-open group. HO was identified in 6 (13.6%) patients in the mini-open group. No HO was identified in the arthroscopic group. In the bivariate analysis, "type of surgery" was the only variable that showed a statistically significant association with HO (p=0.007). Results of this study suggest that anterior mini-open treatment was characterized by a higher risk of HO development compared to hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement treatment regardless of pharmacological prophylaxis. The treatment regimen of 60 mg etoricoxib daily for two weeks was an effective prophylaxis for HO formation in sport participant patients compared with data available in the literature.

The Current Insight of Three Operative Approach for Lateral Epicondylitis: A Systematic Review &amp; Meta-Analysis from 1944 Elbows

Objective: Lateral epicondylitis (LE), also commonly known as tennis elbow, is one of the most common causes of lateral epicondyle pain. Most LE cases can resolve spontaneously or with conservative treatment. However, up to 10% of the patients still do not respond to the conservative treatment, making the operative treatment still needed. Yet, the best approach remains controversial, which leaves the option to the individual surgeon’s experience and ease of the procedure. Our study aims to objectively find the difference in the outcome of the operative modalities qualitatively and quantitatively. Methods: This study was performed and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Guideline where the protocol was registered PROSPERO [ID: CRD42022339650]. OCEBM level I-IV evidence studies were discovered using Boolean search strings that were created according to the patient, intervention, comparison, and outcomes of the study in three databases. Study quality was assessed with the Cochrane RoB tool and MINORS score. The success rate from operative modalities becomes the main outcome of the current study. Results: Forty-six studies were included in the study after a comprehensive literature search was done. From the analysis of 1944 elbows in three different groups, we found that arthroscopic surgery has the highest success rate (91.9%) compared to percutaneous (90.6%) and open (82.7%) lateral epicondylitis surgery with a change in mean pain score of 5.54, 4.90, and 3.63 respectively. The functional outcome improved according to DASH, in the arthroscopic group (51.51 to 15.47), the percutaneous group (44.90 to 10.47), and the open group (53.55 to 16.13). The overall improvement was also found in the MAYO score, in the arthroscopic group (55.12 to 64.70), in the percutaneous group (56.31 to 87.65), and the open group (64 to 93.37). Conclusion: Among the three different modalities of lateral epicondylitis surgery, arthroscopic surgery has the highest rate of success with the highest mean difference in pain score. Every surgical outcome also has an overall improvement in functional outcome scores.

Arthroscopic Repair Versus Conservative Treatment for First-time Anterior Shoulder Dislocation.

To systematically compare the clinical efficacy of conservative treatment and arthroscopic one-stage repair for patients with first-time anterior dislocation of the shoulder. A retrieval and systematic review of randomized controlled studies of primary anterior shoulder dislocation with conservative versus arthroscopic repair was conducted and further pooled analysis was performed to compare the overall difference in clinical outcomes, including redislocation and revision surgery rates, shoulder function scores and related complications. Preliminary meta-analysis showed that the risk of anterior shoulder redislocation was 4.73-fold higher in patients treated conservatively than those undergoing arthroscopic repair (RR:4.73 [2.95-7.58], p<0.000; I2=0%, p=0.920),and that the revision surgery rate was 5.91 times higher in the conservative group than in the arthroscopic repair group (RR:5.91 [2.82-12.39], p<0.000; I2=0%, p=0.560).Early arthroscopic repair can significantly reduce the redislocation and revision surgery rates and also improve the shoulder joint function score, without serious complications. However, it is necessary to recognize the subset of patients with a higher risk of redislocation in young patients through a high quality, blinded, prospective cohort study when early arthroscopic repair intervention in this subset of high-risk patients will be of significant clinical value.

Both Open and Arthroscopic All-Inside Anatomic Reconstruction With Autologous Gracilis Tendon Restore Ankle Stability in Patients With Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability

To compare the return to sports and short-term clinical outcomes between the arthroscopic all-inside and the open anatomic reconstruction with gracilis tendon autograft for chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI) patients. From March 2018 to January 2020, 57 CLAI patients were prospectively included with arthroscopic all-inside anatomic reconstruction (n= 31) or open anatomic reconstruction (n= 26) with gracilis tendon autograft. The patients were evaluated before operation and at 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months after surgery. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score (AOFAS), visual analog scale (VAS), and Karlsson-Peterson score were evaluated at each time point, and stress radiography with a Telos device was performed before surgery and at final follow-up. The time to return to full weightbearing walking, jogging, sports, and work, Tegner activity score, and complications were recorded and compared. All the subjective scores significantly improved after surgery from the preoperative level. Compared with the open group, the arthroscopic group demonstrated significantly earlier return to full weightbearing walking (8.9 vs 11.7 weeks, P < .001), jogging (17.9 vs 20.9 weeks, P= .012), and recreational sports (22.4 vs 26.5 weeks, P= .001) with significantly better AOFAS score and Karlsson score at 3 to 6 months, and better VAS score at 6 months after surgery. The 2 groups demonstrated no significant difference in the surgical duration or surgical complications. No significant difference was found in the clinical scores or stress radiographic measurements at 24 months after surgery (P > .05). Compared with the open procedure, the arthroscopic all-inside anatomic lateral ankle ligament reconstruction with autologous gracilis tendon could achieve earlier return to full weightbearing, jogging, and recreational sports with less pain and better ankle functional scores at 3 to 6 months after surgery. Similar favorable short-term clinical outcomes were achieved for both techniques at 2 years after surgery. Level I, randomized controlled trial.

Comparison of Two Different Percutaneous Screw Fixations for Treating Herbert B2-Type Acute Scaphoid Fractures.

Scaphoid fracture was the most common carpal fracture and the most challenging. The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the clinical effects of closed reduction and percutaneous cannulated screw internal fixation under fluoroscopy and arthroscopy-assisted percutaneous cannulated screw internal fixation in the treatment of Herbert B2-type of acute scaphoid fractures. A retrospective controlled study was conducted on 29 patients with Herbert B2-type acute scaphoid fracture with a displacement of >1 mm admitted to our hospital from January 2017 to June 2021. Patients were divided into two groups, 11 patients were treated with closed reduction percutaneous cannulated screw internal fixation under fluoroscopy and 18 patients were treated with percutaneous cannulated screw internal fixation assisted by arthroscopy. The operative time, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, fracture healing time, complications, and postoperative wrist function score of the two groups were compared. All patients were followed up for 6-18months (mean follow-up duration: 10.38 ± 2.69months). The respective operation times in the arthroscopy group and fluoroscopy group was 51.50 ± 6.69 min and 56.73 ± 11.48 min, respectively (p > 0.05). The number of fluoroscopies performed in the arthroscopy group was (6.83 ± 1.30), which was less than that in the fluoroscopy group (10.91 ± 2.62) (p < 0.05). All fractures in the arthroscopy group healed after the operation, and the fracture healing time was 11.44 ± 1.25W. Ten patients in the fluoroscopy group healed. The fracture healing time was 13.60 ± 2.32 W. The fracture healing time in arthroscopy group was less than that in the fluoroscopy group (p < 0.05). One patient in the fluoroscopy group had nonunion and healed after bone grafting and internal fixation. At the postoperative 6-month follow-up, the modified Mayo wrist function score was used to evaluate the clinical results. The wrist function score of patients in the arthroscopy group was 90 (85, 95), which was >80 (80, 90) in the fluoroscopy group (z=2.74, p < 0.05). For Herbert B2-type acute scaphoid fracture with fracture displacement > 1 mm, the arthroscopy-assisted percutaneous cannulated screw internal fixation has less fluoroscopy times, short fracture healing time, and good recovery effect of wrist function compared to the fluoroscopy.

Use of Anatomic Radiographic Horizons for the Lateral Center-Edge Angle in the Classification of Hip Dysplasia

Background: The lateral center-edge angle of Wiberg (LCEA) and Tönnis angle (TA) rely on a “horizon” that functions as a reference point for measurements of hip dysplasia on weightbearing anteroposterior pelvis radiographs. There are 3 different horizons that are currently utilized depending on surgeon preference: (1) a line parallel to the radiographic floor (F), (2) a line that connects the inferior portions of the acetabular teardrops (ATs), or (3) a line that connects the ischial tuberosities (ITs). It is imperative to accurately assess the degree of hip dysplasia on initial workup to select the appropriate surgical intervention. Purpose: To assess how the choice of a radiographic horizon affects the measurements of the LCEA and TA. The secondary purpose was to assess how the horizon affected the classification of hips as either normal, borderline dysplastic, or dysplastic. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The LCEA and TA were measured on all preoperative weightbearing anteroposterior pelvis radiographs for 186 consecutive patients who underwent hip preservation surgery between February 2016 and November 2020 (140 hip arthroscopic procedures, 46 combined hip arthroscopic procedures with periacetabular osteotomy), 3 times per hip, each time using an F, AT, and IT horizon. The Student t test was used to analyze the differences in the measurements of the LCEA and TA, and discordance rates in the dysplasia classification between horizons were quantified. Results: For the entire study population, the mean LCEAF (23.4°± 7.4°) was significantly greater than the mean LCEAIT (23.1°± 7.2°) (95% CI, −0.634 to −0.003; P = .047) and mean LCEAAT (23.0°± 7.1°) (95% CI, −0.723 to −0.139; P = .004). There was no difference between the LCEAIT and LCEAAT (95% CI, −0.305 to 0.080; P = .251). When stratified by hip arthroscopic surgery, the mean LCEAF (26.3°± 5.6°) was significantly greater than the mean LCEAAT (25.8°± 5.3°) (95% CI, −0.845 to −0.162; P = .004). Overall, there was a 17.7% and 18.3% discordance rate in the dysplasia classification using the LCEAIT and LCEAAT compared with the LCEAF, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the mean TAIT, TAAT, and TAF for the entire study population, the arthroscopic surgery group, and the combined arthroscopic surgery and periacetabular osteotomy group. Conclusion: There was no statistical difference between the AT and IT horizons for LCEA measurements. The dysplasia classification was in better agreement between the 2 anatomic horizons compared with the F horizon. The TA was not affected by changes in the horizon.

Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability Treated With Tendon Allografting: A Preliminary Comparison of Arthroscopic and Open Anatomic Ligament Reconstruction.

Background:Roughly 30% of patients with chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI) have long-lasting painful instability requiring surgical intervention. Ligament reconstruction with the traditional open method and using tendon allografts can provide sufficient mechanical stability for severe CLAI. Arthroscopic ligament reconstruction with tendon allograft has recently been introduced to treat CLAI.Purpose:In this study, we describe an arthroscopic ligament reconstruction procedure involving the use of the tendon allograft for patients with CLAI, and we compare the efficacy of this procedure with open ligament reconstruction with tendon allograft.Study Design:Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:We enrolled 10 patients (4 men and 6 women) with CLAI (mean age, 37.3 years; range, 16-57 years) who underwent arthroscopic ligament reconstruction with tendon allografting between November 2017 and June 2019. The control group consisted of 10 patients who received open tendon allograft reconstruction. Preoperative and 2-year postoperative functional outcomes were evaluated using the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot scale (AOFAS), Karlsson Ankle Functional Score (KAFS), pain visual analog scale (VAS), 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), and Tegner activity score (TAS).Results:The mean operative time was 118 and 110 minutes in the arthroscopic and open groups, respectively. At 2-year follow-up, scores on the AOFAS improved significantly compared with preoperatively, from 71.3 to 96.4 (P = .006) in the arthroscopic group, and from 68.6 to 96.7 (P = .005) in the open group. The postoperative AOFAS, VAS, KAFS, and SF-12 scores did not differ significantly between the 2 groups; however, the TAS score was significantly higher in the arthroscopic reconstruction group compared with in the open group (7 vs 6.1, respectively; P = .01).Conclusion:Arthroscopic ligament reconstruction with tendon allografting resulted in sufficient ankle stability and no donor-site morbidity. This procedure can yield similar functional outcomes to open reconstruction technique and may be an option for the management of CLAI.

Effect of knee arthroscopy on subsequent total knee arthroplasty: Meta-analysis

To evaluate effect of knee arthroscopy on prognosis of subsequent total knee arthroplasty (total knee arthroplasty, TKA) by Meta-analysis. Databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang and other databases were searched by computer from establishing to October 2020 to collect literatures on effect of knee arthroscopy on prognosis of subsequent TKA. Quality evaluation and data extraction were carried out according to inclusion, exclusion criteria and literature screening. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to evaluate literature quality of non-randomized controlled studies. RevMan 5.3 software was applied to Meta-analysis on revision rate, reoperation rate, postoperative stiffness rate, periprosthetic infection rate, postoperative venous thrombosis venous thromboembolism(VTE) rate and postoperative knee flexion range of motion after TKA. Eight literatures were finally included with totally sample size of 182 815 patients. Among them, 6 998 patients were in knee arthroscopy group and 175 817 patients were in knee arthroscopy group. Meta-analysis results showed that there were statistical differences in revision rate after TKA[OR=1.66, 95%CI(1.37, 2.00), P<0.000 01], re-operation rate[OR=2.31, 95%CI(1.59, 3.36), P<0.000 1], postoperative stiffness rate[OR=1.78, 95%CI(1.02, 3.11), P=0.04] and infection rate around prosthesis[OR=1.40, 95%CI(1.19, 1.66), P<0.000 1]. While there were no difference in VTE rate[OR=1.06, 95%CI(0.83, 1.35), P=0.64], postoperative knee flexion range of motion[MD=-1.21, 95%CI(-3.07, 0.65), P=0.20]. Knee arthroscopy has a negative impact on subsequent TKA surgery. Previous arthroscopic increased risk of stiffness, periprosthetic joint infection, revision and reoperation after TKA, but there was no significant difference in postoperative knee flexion range of motion and incidence of VTE.

Comparison of Walking Biomechanics After Physical Therapist–Led Care or Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Secondary Analysis From a Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome is characterized by chondrolabral damage and hip pain. The specific biomechanics used by people with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome during daily activities may exacerbate their symptoms. Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome can be treated nonoperatively or surgically; however, differential treatment effects on walking biomechanics have not been examined. Purpose: To compare the 12-month effects of physical therapist–led care or arthroscopy on trunk, pelvis, and hip kinematics as well as hip moments during walking. Study Design: Secondary analysis of multi-centre, pragmatic, two-arm superiority randomized controlled trial subsample; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: A subsample of 43 participants from the Australian Full randomised controlled trial of Arthroscopic Surgery for Hip Impingement versus best cONventional (FASHIoN trial) underwent gait analysis and completed the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33) at both baseline and 12 months after random allocation to physical therapist–led care (personalized hip therapy; n = 22; mean age 35; 41% female) or arthroscopy (n = 21; mean age 36; 48% female). Changes in trunk, pelvis, and hip biomechanics were compared between treatment groups across the gait cycle using statistical parametric mapping. Associations between changes in iHOT-33 and changes in hip kinematics across 3 planes of motion were examined. Results: As compared with the arthroscopy group, the personalized hip therapy group increased its peak hip adduction moments (mean difference = 0.35 N·m/body weight·height [%] [95% CI, 0.05-0.65]; effect size = 0.72; P = .02). Hip adduction moments in the arthroscopy group were unchanged in response to treatment. No other between-group differences were detected. Improvements in iHOT-33 were not associated with changes in hip kinematics. Conclusion: Peak hip adduction moments were increased in the personalized hip therapy group and unchanged in the arthroscopy group. No biomechanical changes favoring arthroscopy were detected, suggesting that personalized hip therapy elicits greater changes in hip moments during walking at 12-month follow-up. Twelve-month changes in hip-related quality of life were not associated with changes in hip kinematics.

Femoral de-rotation osteotomy versus hip arthroscopy for management of femoroacetabular impingement in adult patients with decreased femoral anteversion: a matched retrospective cohort study.

ABSTRACTFemoral de-rotation osteotomy (FDO) and hip arthroscopy are both recognized surgical options for the management of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) in the setting of decreased femoral anteversion (<5°). Minimal comparative data exist regarding the difference in outcomes between these two techniques, and we believe this is the first study to provide that comparison. This retrospective cohort study included a total of 20 patients with such pathology, matched for age, gender and body mass index. A total of 10 patients were included in the FDO group [median anteversion −0.5° (true retroversion); average follow-up 17.9 months]. In total, 10 patients were included in the hip arthroscopy group [median anteversion −0.5° (true retroversion); average follow-up 28.5 months]. Both groups demonstrated statistically and clinically significant improvement in the post-operative International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33) scores [median improvement: FDO group, 37.7 points (r 14–58.8; P < 0.041); hip arthroscopy group, 35.9 points (r 11.1–81; P < 0.05)], noting that the minimal clinically important difference for the iHOT-33 is 6.1 points. However, the study was not adequately powered to delineate a difference in improvement between the two groups. The findings suggest significant improvement in patient-reported outcomes, and clinical findings can be achieved with either FDO or hip arthroscopy for FAI in the setting of decreased femoral anteversion. However, selection of the most suitable surgical procedure using a patient-specific approach may optimize outcomes in this challenging population.

Treatment of Primary Dorsal Wrist Ganglion-A Systematic Review.

Purpose The aim of this study was to compare the rates of recurrence and wound infection in patients with primary dorsal wrist ganglion treated with aspiration (with or without an injection of an additive), open excision, or arthroscopic resection. Methods This systematic review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and registered on PROSPERO. Systematic electronic searches in PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library of Controlled Trials were performed on May 5, 2020, and June 1, 2021, respectively. All clinical studies written in English determining the recurrence and wound infection rates after treatment of primary dorsal wrist ganglion with aspiration, open excision, or arthroscopic resection in patients over the age of 16 years were eligible for inclusion. Quality assessment was guided by the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the methodological index for nonrandomized studies (MINORS) tool for observational studies. Results The literature searches resulted in 1,691 studies. After screening, five RCTs, enrolling 233 patients, and six observational studies, enrolling 316 patients with primary dorsal wrist ganglions were included. Quality assessment of the included RCTs and observational studies determined the existing level of evidence pertaining to primary dorsal wrist ganglion treatment to be low. About 11 studies reported on recurrence rate, which ranged between 7 and 72% for patients initially treated with aspiration (with or without an injection of an additive). In comparison, the recurrence rate for the open excision and arthroscopic resection groups ranged between 6 to 41% and 0 to 16%, respectively. Four studies investigated wound-related complications, for which zero infections were reported, irrespective of treatment. Conclusion The evidence summarized in this systematic review demonstrates a considerable variability in recurrence rate following aspiration and open or arthroscopic resection of a primary dorsal wrist ganglion. The greatest variability in recurrence was displayed among studies on aspiration. The overall infection rate after treatment of dorsal wrist ganglions seems to be low regardless of the treatment type. However, the divergent results of individual studies highlight a pressing need for prospective controlled trials assessing outcomes following dorsal wrist ganglion treatment. Level of Evidence Systematic review on level 1 to 4 clinical therapeutic studies.

Paper 66: Radiostereometric Analysis of Biceps Tenodesis: A Prospective Comparison of All-Suture Anchor vs. Interference Screw, Arthroscopic and Mini-Open Techniques

Objectives:Recent studies suggest that similar results can be achieved via arthroscopic and open biceps tenodesis techniques. The purpose of this investigation was to quantify and compare the behavior of the biceps tenodesis construct in arthroscopic suprapectoral (ASPBT) and open subpectoral (OSPBT) techniques performed with either interference screw or suture anchor fixation, with radiostereometric analysis (RSA).Methods:A prospective cohort study was performed comparing migration of the biceps tendon after suprapectoral and subpectoral biceps tenodesis (BT) with Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) interference screw vs. all-suture suture anchor (ASSA) fixation. Patients with symptomatic biceps tendinopathy, anterior intertubercular groove tenderness, and positive biceps tension tests were included in the investigation. A tantalum bead, functioning as a radiostereometric marker, was sutured to the biceps tendon before final fixation of tendon tissue with either an interference screw or suture anchor. Following final fixation, AP radiographs were obtained intraoperatively. Follow up single view AP radiographs were obtained at one week and 3-months post-operatively. The distance from the center of the tantalum bead to the most proximal aspect of the humeral head was measured.Results:Of 128 patients enrolled, 120 (93.8%) were available for follow-up. The average age was 52.05±10.5 years, average BMI 30.8±5.4, and 29% of the patients were females. Groups were similar concerning patient demographics and concomitant procedures. At final follow up, there was no difference in distal migration between the OSPBT and ASPBT performed with an interference screw (4.31 vs. 4.02 mm, respectively, P=0.418). BT performed with a single ASSA demonstrated significantly more migration than BT performed with double ASSA (27.24 vs. 9.73 mm, respectively, P=0.005) and significantly more migration than the interference screw (27.24 26 vs. 4.31 mm, respectively, P<0.001). BT performed with the double ASSA technique demonstrated significantly more migration than the interference screw (9.73 vs. 4.02 mm, respectively, P=0.041). Three patients (11.1%) in the open single ASSA group, one patient in the arthroscopic double ASSA group (4.0%) suffered Popeye deformities. None of the patients in the interference screw cohorts experienced Popeye deformities.Conclusions:OSPBT and ASPBT demonstrate similar construct stability with use of interference screws as assessed by RSA. BT performed with single ASSA fixation resulted in more distal migration compared to double ASSA and interference screw fixation. Interference screw fixation provided more construct stability compared to a single and double ASSA, whether performed arthroscopically or with an open approach. These findings are the first in vivo results to characterize and quantify the biceps tenodesis construct in the post-operative period.Table 1.Patient Demographics and Other Characteristics.Table 2.Intraoperative Findings.Table 3.Tantalum bead migration at 1 week, 3 months and between 1 week and 3 months for arthroscopic and open techniques.Figure 1.Comparison of postoperative construct migration for the four studied techniques of biceps tenodesis measured by radiostereometric analysis.