Arthroscopic Treatment Of Femoroacetabular Impingement Research Articles

Bilateral versus unilateral hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review.

One in four patients presenting with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) has bilateral symptoms, and despite excellent outcomes reported after arthroscopic treatment of FAI, there remains a paucity of data on the outcomes following bilateral hip arthroscopy. This systematic review aims to examine the outcomes following bilateral (either ‘simultaneous’ or ‘staged’) versus unilateral hip arthroscopy for FAI. A systematic review of multiple electronic databases was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and checklist. All studies comparing simultaneous, staged and/or unilateral hip arthroscopy for FAI were eligible for inclusion. Case series, case reports and reviews were excluded. All study, patient and hip-specific data were extracted and analyzed. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale was used to assess study quality. A meta-analysis was not performed due to heterogeneity among outcome measures. A total of six studies, including 722 patients (42.8% male) and 933 hips were eligible for inclusion. The mean age across patients was 35.5. The average time between staged procedures was 7.7 months. Four of the six studies were retrospective cohort studies, while the remaining two were prospective in nature. The overall quality of the eligible studies was found to be good. No significant difference was noted among patient-reported outcomes (modified Harris hip score, hip outcome score and non-arthritic hip score), visual analog scale, return to sport, traction time and complications between those undergoing bilateral (simultaneous or staged) versus unilateral hip arthroscopy. Based on the current available evidence, bilateral hip arthroscopy (whether simultaneous or staged) exhibits similar efficacy and safety when compared with unilateral hip arthroscopy. However, further prospective study is required to confirm this finding.

Intra-abdominal Pressure Changes During Hip Arthroscopy: A Prospective Multicenter Study

To evaluate intra-abdominal pressure changes during hip arthroscopy and define its relationship with other patient related variables. A prospective multicenter study evaluating intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) in patients undergoing arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement was performed. The IAP was measured indirectly by a bladder catheter (AbViser Autovalve Intra-abdominal pressure monitor) and documented every 30 minutes during the entire procedure. The following risk factors were analyzed: traction time, duration surgery, previous abdominal surgery, capsule repair, psoas tenotomy, and surgical approach. One hundred and five patients with symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement that underwent hip arthroscopy met the inclusion criteria. There were significant differences in the IAP between the preoperative measurement of IAP and the IAP at different time points during surgery (P<.01). The IAP increased continuously from the commencement of surgery (considered as time point from portal establishment) until the first 60 minutes. After first 60 minutes of surgery, the IAP did not increase significantly. There were no significant associations between increased IAP and the risk factors analyzed. IAP increases significantly during the first 60 minutes of hip arthroscopy; it then stabilizes for the duration of surgery before decreasing just after the completion of surgery. The highest recorded IAP was not associated with additional complications. No symptomatic intra-abdominal hypertension was documented. Finally, patient- and procedure-specific risk factors did not predict changes in IAP. Systemic monitoring of IAP during the hip arthroscopy procedure can easily and effectively be done, allowing the surgeon to early detect any significant change. Level IV, therapeutic case series.

MRI Assessment of Subspine Impingement: Features beyond the Anterior Inferior Iliac Spine Morphology.

Background The MRI manifestations of subspine impingement (SSI) other than morphologic features of anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS) have not been extensively explored and validated. Purpose To determine the MRI findings associated with SSI, including AIIS morphologic features, femoral distal cam, and associated soft-tissue injuries. Materials and Methods This is a retrospective study of symptomatic patients who underwent arthroscopic treatment for femoroacetabular impingement between December 2014 and March 2017, with preoperative MRI within 6 months before surgery. The SSI group included patients with clinical and intraoperative findings of SSI; the remaining patients comprised the non-SSI group. Preoperative MRI findings were independently assessed by two radiologists who were blinded to clinical information. Interreader agreement was assessed, and multivariable logistic regression was also used. Results A total of 62 patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 42.1 years ± 11.9; 38 women) were included. SSI was diagnosed in 20 of the 62 patients (32%) (mean age, 43 years ± 12); 42 patients (68%) did not have SSI (mean age, 41 years ± 10). Reader 1 detected distal cam in 16 of the 20 patients with SSI (80%) and eight of the 42 patients without SSI (19%), and reader 2 detected distal cam in 15 of the 20 patients with SSI (75%) and eight of the 42 patients without SSI (19%) (P < .001 for both). Reader 1 detected signs of impingement on the distal femoral neck (IDFN) in 18 of the 20 patients with SSI (90%) and seven of the 42 patients without SSI (16%), and reader 2 detected signs of IDFN in 13 of the 20 patients with SSI (65%) and nine of the 42 patients without SSI (21%) (P < .001 and P = .001, respectively). Reader 1 detected superior capsular edema in 15 of 20 patients with SSI (75%) and three of 42 patients without SSI (7%), and reader 2 detected superior capsular edema in 17 of 20 patients with SSI (85%) and 22 of 42 patients without SSI (52%) (P < .001 and P = .02, respectively). Distal cam was a predictor of SSI after adjustment for IDFN. Interreader agreement was substantial for distal cam (κ = 0.80) and moderate for IDFN (κ = 0.50). Conclusion Soft-tissue injuries and osseous findings other than morphologic features of the anterior inferior iliac spine were associated with subspine impingement. © RSNA, 2019 See also the editorial by Guermazi in this issue.

Post-Treatment Classification for Acetabular Chondral Lesions in Hip Arthroscopy.

Objective To describe a postarthroscopic treatment classification system for acetabular chondral damage in the hip and to report the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of such classification. Methods This is a retrospective review of ninety-nine digital video recordings made during arthroscopic surgery. Patients who underwent arthroscopic treatment for femoroacetabular impingement and evaluated at the hip arthroscopy outpatient clinic between March 2015 and March 2016 were included in the study. Patients with a history of previous hip surgery, radiologic evidence of advanced osteoarthritis (Tönnis grade > 2), who underwent labral resection, or whose digital recordings were incomplete or of insufficient quality for adequate review were excluded. Two orthopedic surgeons, who did not participate in the surgery, independently reviewed the video recordings and classified the remaining acetabular cartilage using the post-treatment classification system. Intraobserver and interobserver analysis was then conducted using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results Excellent intraobserver reliability (ICC = 0.790; p < 0.001) and interobserver reliability (ICC = 0.882; p < 0.001) were observed. Both ICC values were statistically significant. Conclusion The posttreatment classification of the remaining acetabular cartilage has excellent intra and interobserver reliability.

A New Method for Cartilage Evaluation in Femoroacetabular Impingement Using Quantitative T2 Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Preliminary Validation against Arthroscopic Findings.

The outcome of arthroscopic treatment for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) depends on the preoperative status of the hip cartilage. Quantitative T2 can detect early biochemical cartilage changes, but its routine implementation is challenging. Furthermore, intrinsic T2 variability between patients makes it difficult to define a threshold to identify cartilage lesions. To address this, we propose a normalized T2-index as a new method to evaluate cartilage in FAI. We retrospectively analyzed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data of 18 FAI patients with arthroscopically confirmed cartilage defects. Cartilage T2 maps were reconstructed from multi-spin-echo 3-T data using the echo-modulation-curve (EMC) model-based technique. The central femoral cartilage, assumed healthy in early-stage FAI, was used as the normalization reference to define a T2-index. We investigated the ability of the T2-index to detect surgically confirmed cartilage lesions. The average T2-index was 1.14 ± 0.1 and 1.13 ± 0.1 for 2 separated segmentations. Using T2-index >1 as the threshold for damaged cartilage, accuracy was 88% and 100% for the 2 segmentations. We found moderate intraobserver repeatability, although separate segmentations yielded comparable accuracy. Damaged cartilage could not be identified using nonnormalized average T2 values. This preliminary study confirms the importance of normalizing T2 values to account for interpatient variability and suggests that the T2-index is a promising biomarker for the detection of cartilage lesions in FAI. Future work is needed to confirm that combining T2-index with morphologic MRI and other quantitative biomarkers could improve cartilage assessment in FAI.

Outcomes for Surgical Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement in Adults.

To assess the outcomes of modern techniques for arthroscopic surgery in the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement. While initially approached by means of open surgical hip dislocation, recent literature has shown generally good outcomes of arthroscopic treatment for femoroacetabular impingement. Modern advances in hip arthroscopy technique and implants now allow for labral repair or reconstruction when indicated. Arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement results in significant improvements in patient pain and function, with low complication rates and high patient satisfaction. A majority of improvements in these patients occur within 1 to 2years post-operatively. Hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement yields the best results in patients without significant arthritis or hip dysplasia.

Surgical Treatment for FAI: Arthroscopic and Open Techniques for Osteoplasty.

To review the relevant literature and techniques regarding arthroscopic and open treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). To discuss both the senior authors' preferred method of arthroscopic and open treatment of FAI. Routine treatment of FAI has moved away from open techniques and is more focused arthroscopic methods. Arthroscopic treatment of FAI has more recently focused on differing techniques of hip access and capsular management. Open techniques still have a role in FAI, but indications for open management are focused on cases with more severe pathology. While arthroscopic techniques have shown better outcomes in the short term and higher return to play, it is not without risk and is a procedure with a steep learning curve. In cases of complex joint pathology, such as FAI coupled with dysplasia or Legg-Calve-Perthes, arthroscopy may be not indicated and an open approach preferred. We outline various techniques for both arthroscopic and open treatment of FAI and their outcomes when possible.

Clinical and Radiographic Predictors for Unsalvageable Labral Tear at the Time of Initial Hip Arthroscopic Management for Femoroacetabular Impingement

Background: The acetabular labrum plays important roles in proprioception, nociception, synovial fluid seal effect, and static and dynamic joint stability and as a shock absorber. Clinical and radiographic risk factors for unsalvageable labral tear in femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) are not well established. Purpose: To identify predictors of unsalvageable labral tear during initial hip arthroscopic management of FAI. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients were included who underwent primary hip arthroscopic treatment for FAI between March 2009 and March 2014. Patients were excluded who had <2-year follow-up, underwent bilateral surgery, or had a history of surgery, osteoarthritis (Tönnis grade 2 or 3), and other diagnoses, including lateral center-edge angle <25° diagnosed as developmental hip dysplasia. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to their labral condition: reconstruction and refixation. Unsalvageable labral tear was defined as any irreparable labral tear, including severe degenerative tear, frayed labrum, labral ossification, flattened labrum, and failed prior repair during surgery. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified risk factors for segmental labral reconstruction. Patient-reported outcome scores and postoperative revision rates were also assessed. Results: Twenty-five hips (18 male, 7 female) and 126 hips (65 male, 61 female) were included in the reconstruction and refixation groups, respectively. The mean ± SD ages were 52.6 ± 15.0 and 36.5 ± 16.1 years in the reconstruction and refixation groups, respectively. In the reconstruction group, the mean modified Harris Hip Score significantly improved from 67.3 ± 14.9 preoperatively to 95.0 ± 8.1 at final follow-up (P < .001), and the mean Nonarthritic Hip Score improved from 63.0 ± 18.3 preoperatively to 89.5 ± 10.1 at final follow-up (P < .001). In the refixation group, the mean modified Harris Hip Score significantly improved from 69.2 ± 18.6 preoperatively to 93.0 ± 11.2 at final follow-up (P < .001), and the mean Nonarthritic Hip Score improved from 60.7 ± 18.8 preoperatively to 88.6 ± 15.0 at final follow-up (P < .001). No significant difference was noted in patient-reported outcome scores and revision hip arthroscopy rates. The rate of conversion of total hip arthroplasty was higher in the reconstruction group than in the refixation group. Risk factors for unsalvageable labral tear were age ≥45 years (odds ratio [OR], 8.83; P < .007), body mass index ≥23.1 kg/m2 (OR, 13.05; P < .001), and vertical center anterior angle ≥36° (OR, 19.03; P < .001). Furthermore, in this study, unsalvageable labral tears were present in cases with at least 2 of the 3 risk factors. Conclusion: Age ≥45 years, body mass index ≥23.1 kg/m2, and vertical center anterior angle ≥36° are risk factors for unsalvageable labral tear at initial hip arthroscopic surgery for patients with FAI.

Patients aged in their 70s do not have a high risk of progressive osteoarthritis following arthroscopic femoroacetabular impingement correction and labral preservation surgery

PurposeThe purposes of this study were to (1) evaluate the effect of age on clinical outcomes of arthroscopic femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) with labral preservation surgery and (2) identify predictors of poor postoperative clinical outcomes.MethodsEighty-four patients who underwent hip arthroscopic treatment for FAI between 2009 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into three groups based on age. The Advanced age group consisted of patients over 70 years old, the Middle age group consisted of patients in their 50s and 60s, and the Younger age group consisted of patients less than 50 years of age. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) conversion, radiographic progression of osteoarthritis and patient-reported outcomes including modified Harris Hip Score (MHHS) and Non-arthritic Hip Score (NAHS) were investigated.ResultsThe mean follow-up period was 32.2 (range 24–60) months. THA was required in 3 patients in their 50s and 60s, which was a significantly higher rate compared to that in patients Younger than 50 years old (17% vs 0%, p = 0.036). Progression to osteoarthritis was also significantly more frequent in patients in their 50s and 60s than in patients in their 70s (50s and 60s: 33%; 70s: 0%, p = 0.030). In all age groups, the preoperative MHHS and NAHS improved at last follow-up (p < 0.001). The 50s and 60s age group [hazard ratio (HR) 6.62], preoperative mild osteoarthritic change (Tönnis grade 1, HR: 3.29) and severe cartilage damage on the acetabulum (HR: 2.63) were risk factors for progressive osteoarthritis and THA conversion.ConclusionsArthroscopic FAI correction and labral preservation surgery provide favourable clinical outcomes for patients over 70 years old in the absence of significant osteoarthritis and severe acetabular chondral damage. Patients in their 50s and 60s have a higher risk of both THA conversion and progressive osteoarthritis, while patients aged over 70 years show no evidence of progressive osteoarthritis. Chronologic age in isolation is not an absolute contra-indication to hip arthroscopy.Level of evidenceIII.

Prior arthroscopic treatment for femoro-acetabular impingement does not compromise hip arthroplasty outcomes: a matched-controlled study with minimum two-year follow-up.

Femoro-acetabular impingement (FAI) is known as a predisposing factor in the development of osteoarthritis of the hip. In order to treat this condition, hip arthroscopy is considered as the gold standard in recent years. The number of performed hip arthroscopies has risen immensely. However, a number of patients with poor outcome after hip arthroscopy will require further surgical intervention, sometimes even conversion into THR (total hip replacement). The purpose of this study was to analyze whether outcomes of THR are affected by prior hip arthroscopy in these patients. Patients who underwent a THR following an ipsilateral hip arthroscopy were matched to a control group of THR patients with no history of prior ipsilateral hip surgery. Matching criteria were age, sex, body mass index, implants used, and surgical approach. Modified Harris Hip Score, surgical time, presence of heterotopic ossification, and post-operative complication were prospectively compared at a minimum twoyear follow-up. Thirty-three THR after hip arthroscopy patients were successfully matched to control patients. There was no significant difference in mHHS between both groups (FAI treatment group 92.8 vs. control group 93.8, p = 0.07). However, FAI treatment group showed a lower mHHS score pre-operatively (48 vs. 60, p = 0.002). There was no significant difference in surgical time and post-operative complication rate. No heterotopic ossification could be found. A prior hip arthroscopy has no affect to clinical outcomes of subsequent THR.

Good 5-year outcomes after arthroscopic treatment for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome

PurposeThe purpose of the present study was to evaluate the outcome of arthroscopic treatment for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome 5 years post-surgery using patient-reported outcome scores (PROMs) validated for a young and active population with hip complaints.MethodsPatients were prospectively included in the study. A total of 184 patients [males = 110 (59.8%), females = 74 (40.2%)], with mean age 38.0, underwent arthroscopic treatment for FAI syndrome and were analysed. Preoperatively and at the 5-year follow-up, patients completed a set of self-administered web-based PROMs consisting of the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12), the Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS), the Hip Sports Activity Scale (HSAS), the EuroQoL-5 Dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D), the EQ-Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the VAS for overall hip function and overall satisfaction. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare preoperative PROM values with those obtained at the 5-year follow-up.ResultsA comparison of preoperative PROM scores and those obtained at the 5-year follow-up revealed statistically significant improvements for all outcome scores (p < 0.05), except for the HSAS score, which were unchanged; iHOT-12 (42.9 vs 67.2), HAGOS different subscales (50.2 vs 69.6, 55.7 vs 76.1, 59.2 vs 72.3, 41.1 vs 66.4, 30.8 vs 60.2, 31.6 vs 60.4), EQ-5D (0.570 vs 0.742), EQ-VAS (66.6 vs 74.4), HSAS (3.13 vs 3.17) and VAS for overall hip function (47.9 vs 69.2). At the 5-year follow-up, 154 patients reported that they were satisfied with surgery (84.6%). Survivorship at the 5-year follow-up was 86.4%.ConclusionArthroscopic treatment for FAI syndrome yields good patient-reported outcome at the 5-year follow-up.Level of evidenceII.

Periportal Capsulotomy: Technique and Outcomes for a Limited Capsulotomy During Hip Arthroscopy

To present the technique and outcomes of a limited periportal capsulotomy without capsular closure for arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Retrospective review of a prospectively collected database of patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy for symptomatic FAI was performed to analyze patients who underwent periportal capsulotomy. Periportal capsulotomy was performed through dilation of the midanterior and anterolateral portals without completion of a full interportal capsulotomy, preserving the iliofemoral ligament. Arthroscopic labral treatment and osteochondroplasty were completed as indicated without necessitating capsular closure. Patient demographics, surgical details, and complications were recorded. Pre- and postoperatively, patients completed the modified Harris Hip Score, Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), 12-item Short-Form survey, and visual analog scale. Postoperative outcome data was analyzed at 1- and 2-year follow-up. One hundred and forty-two patients treated with the periportal capsulotomy technique were included (mean age, 35.5 ± 11.7; body mass index, 25.4 ± 4.1; 50.7% men). There were no major postoperative complications including hip instability or reoperation. Significant improvements in mean patient-reported outcomes from preoperative scores were seen at the 1- and 2-year follow-ups (modified Harris Hip Score, 18.4 ± 19.1, 21.1 ±17.7, HOOS symptoms, 20.1 ± 21.2, 22.8 ± 23.5, HOOS pain, 23.4 ± 21.2, 27.6 ± 19.3, HOOS activities of daily life, 21.2 ± 20.8, 24.3 ± 21.6, HOOS sport, 32.5 ± 27.0, 36.5 ± 26.9, HOOS quality of life, 37.9 ± 26.7, 46.0 ± 22.8, and 12-item Short-Form survey physical component score, 16.4 ± 15.3, 20.8 ±13.2, respectively). Only the HOOS quality of life demonstrated further improvement from 1- to 2years postoperatively (P= .043). Periportal capsulotomy provides safe and sufficient access to the hip joint for arthroscopic treatment of FAI without necessitating capsular closure. Using this technique, patients showed significant clinical improvement and no postoperative instability at 1 and 2years after surgery. Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Predictors of Persistent Postoperative Pain at Minimum 2 Years After Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement

Background: Hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) is a rapidly expanding field, and preoperative factors predictive of persistent postoperative pain are currently unknown. Purpose: To identify predictors for persistent postoperative pain at the site of surgery after hip arthroscopy for FAIS. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for FAIS and had a minimum 2-year follow-up with patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were included in this study. Patients with previous open hip surgery and diagnoses other than FAIS were excluded. Patients were grouped by visual analog scale scores for pain as limited (<30) and persistent (≥30). Patient factors and outcomes were analyzed with univariate and correlation analyses to build a logistic regression model to identify predictors of persistent postoperative pain. Results: The limited pain (n = 514) and persistent pain (n = 174) groups totaled 688 patients (449 females). There was a statistically significant difference in age between groups, with the persistent pain group being older than the low pain group (35.9 ± 12.2 vs 32.4 ± 12.6, respectively; P = .002). Patients with persistent postoperative pain demonstrated significantly lower preoperative PRO scores in the Hip Outcome Score–Activities of Daily Living (57.6 ± 21.2 vs 67.7 ± 16.8), Hip Outcome Score–Sport Specific (35.9 ± 23.9 vs 44.1 ± 22.7), modified Harris Hip Score (51.6 ± 16.2 vs 59.6 ± 12.9), and International Hip Outcome Tool (32.0 ± 16.8 vs 40.0 ± 17.82) but no significant differences in preoperative visual analog scale scores for pain (7.3 ± 1.8 vs 7.2 ± 1.7). Mean postoperative PRO differences between pain groups were all statistically significant. Bivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that history of anxiety or depression (odds ratio, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.02-3.32; P = .042), revision hip arthroscopy (odds ratio, 8.6; 95% CI, 1.79-40.88; P = .007), and a low preoperative modified Harris Hip Score (odds ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.95-0.99; P = .30) were predictors of persistent postoperative pain. Conclusion: Independent predictors for persistent postoperative pain include revision hip arthroscopy and mental health history positive for anxiety and depression. Our analysis demonstrated significant improvements in pain and functional PROs in the limited pain and persistent pain groups; however, those with persistent pain demonstrated significantly lower PRO scores.

Predictors of Persistent Postoperative Pain at Minimum Two-years After Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement

Objectives: To evaluate predictors for persistent postoperative pain following hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). We hypothesized that patients with chronic preoperative pain, smokers, and those with co-morbid mental health disease would have greater persistent postoperative pain. Methods: Patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAIS were identified in a prospectively collected database with a minimum of two-year follow-up with patient reported outcomes (PROs). Previous open hip surgery and diagnoses other than FAIS were excluded. Patients were grouped by VAS-Pain scores as limited (≤30) and persistent (&gt;30). Patient factors and outcomes were analyzed with univariate and correlation analyses to build a logistic regression to identify predictors of postoperative pain. Results: The limited pain (n=514) and persistent pain (n=174) groups totaled 688 patients (449 females). The persistent pain group was significantly older with a greater proportion of revision arthroscopy, worker’s compensation cases, smokers, hypertension, a history of a psychiatric diagnosis and preoperative narcotic use. Both collegiate sport participation [odds ratio (OR) -6.09 (95% CI: -1.23--30.3, p=0.027) and frequent running (OR -1.75, 95% CI: -1.09--2.81; p=0.021) decreased risk for pain. Smokers were 2.22 times more likely to have persistent pain (p=0.032; 95% CI: 1.07-4.46). A history of anxiety and depression is associated with 2.87 greater risk for persistent pain (p=0.030; 95% CI: 1.11-7.45). Conclusion: Independent predictors for persistent postoperative pain include current smoking and mental health history positive for anxiety and depression. Running as a primary form of exercise and high-level athletic participation are protective against persistent pain. Additional risk factors for increased pain include increased age, workers’ compensation claim, previous comorbid disease treated with surgery, and decreased preoperative PROs. Our analysis demonstrated significant improvements in both pain and functional PROs in both the limited pain and persistent pain groups; however, those with persistent pain demonstrated significantly inferior PROs.

Periportal Capsulotomy: A Technique for Limited Violation of the Hip Capsule During Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement

Hip arthroscopy has become the standard treatment for symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement as patients have shown good outcomes and high satisfaction with this intervention. However, capsular management to gain access for intra-articular procedures remains greatly debated. Capsular closure is advocated particularly in the setting of interportal or T-capsulotomy to avoid complications of instability or nonhealing capsule. We introduce a technique for capsular management through a limited periportal capsulotomy during arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement. In using dilation of the anterolateral and mid-anterior portals without completion of a full interportal capsulotomy, the stabilizing iliofemoral ligament is preserved. We have found that periportal capsulotomy provides safe and sufficient access to the hip joint without necessitating capsular closure.

Arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement in patients older than 60 years

Arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement in patients older than 60 years

How Should We Define Clinically Significant Outcome Improvement on the iHOT-12?

There is increased emphasis on efficiently administering patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). The International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT-12) is a short-form version of the iHOT-33, and relatively little is known about clinically significant outcomes using the iHOT-12. The purpose of this study was to define minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for the iHOT-12 and to identify predictors for achieving these psychometric end points in patients undergoing arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Data was prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed as part of an institutional hip preservation repository. One hundred and twenty patients were included; mean age and body mass index (BMI) were 38.7years and 25.9, respectively. A majority of patients were female (67.5%) and white (81.7%) and participated in recreational sports (79.2%). The iHOT-12 was administered pre-operatively and at 1-year follow-up to patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy for FAI. The following anchor question was also asked at 1-year follow-up: "Taking into account all the activities you have during your daily life, your level of pain, and also your functional impairment, do you consider that your current state is satisfactory?" MCID was calculated using a distribution-based method. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis with area under the curve was used to confirm the significance of the PASS threshold. Mean iHOT-12 scores improved from 35.6 at pre-operative assessment to 70.7 at 1-year follow-up. Patients indicating satisfaction with their outcome improved from 37.5 pre-operatively to 79.0 at 1-year follow-up. MCID value for the iHOT-12 was 13.0. The PASS threshold was 63.0, indicating an excellent predictive value that patients scoring above this threshold were likely to have met an acceptable symptom state. Worker's compensation patients and those with increased BMI were less likely to achieve PASS; lower pre-operative iHOT-12 score was predictive for achieving MCID, and achieving MCID was predictive for achieving PASS. This is the first study to define PASS and MCID for the iHOT-12, which measures clinically significant outcome improvement comparably to that of other commonly used hip PROMs. As its use becomes more widespread, the iHOT-12 data-points presented in this study can be used to determine clinically significant improvement of patient-reported outcomes.

Time Required to Achieve Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit After Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement

Background: Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) defines the minimum degree of quantifiable outcome improvement that a patient perceives as the result of an intervention or in the process of healing. Substantial clinical benefit (SCB) defines the amount of quantifiable outcome improvement that is needed for a patient to feel substantially better. Little is known about when clinically significant outcome improvement is achieved. Purpose: To investigate the time-dependent nature of MCID and SCB after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: An institutional hip preservation registry was queried. The modified Harris Hip Score, Hip Outcome Score, and 33-item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33) were administered to patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAI. Follow-up times for outcome measures were classified into 3 periods: 5 to 11 months (6 months), 12 to 23 months (1 year), and 24 to 35 months (2 years). Cumulative probabilities for achieving MCID and SCB were calculated with Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis and interval censoring. A Weibull parametric regression analysis evaluated the odds of achieving earlier MCID. Results: A total of 719 patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy were included. The mean ± SD age was 32.5 ± 10.5 years, and the majority were female (n = 380, 52.9%). Across all 4 outcome instruments, patients had the highest probability for achieving MCID and SCB by the 6-month postoperative period. The iHOT-33 demonstrated the highest probability for capturing MCID and SCB improvement at each of the 3 periods, with 76.0%, 84.8%, and 93.6% achieving MCID by 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years, respectively. Similarly, the probabilities of achieving SCB on the iHOT-33 were as follows: 57.1%, 68.0%, and 71.7%. A similar trend was demonstrated across other outcome tools. Older male patients and those with Outerbridge classification 1 to 4 (vs grade 0) had a significantly increased risk for taking a longer time to achieve MCID and SCB. Additionally, patients with higher preoperative outcome scores took a longer time to achieve MCID and SCB. Conclusion: At least half of patients treated with hip arthroscopy for FAI achieve MCID and SCB within the first 6 months after the procedure. However, clinically significant outcome improvement continues to be attained until 2 years postoperatively. Female patients, younger individuals, and those without chondral defects achieve faster clinical outcome improvement. These findings can be helpful for establishing shared decision-making aids and follow-up guidelines for arthroscopic treatment of FAI.

Mid-term outcome after arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement: development of a predictive score.

To build a post-arthroscopy outcome-predictive score (POPS) associated with the likelihood of lasting benefit after arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and based solely on unambiguous preoperative information. A population of 220 FAI patients, operated on with standard techniques by orthopaedic surgeons trained in hip arthroscopy in 6 different centres, was evaluated physically or by telephone interview 2 to 5 years after surgery. The criteria of successful mid-term outcome (SMO) were agreed upon by all authors. A multivariate logistic regression, adjusted for patient's age and centre, was applied to predict SMO. In the model, the variables associated with the outcome were included and the relative ORs (odds ratios) were used to compute the FAI-POPS (FAI - post-arthroscopy outcome-predictive score). A ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curve was plotted and the optimum cut-off was calculated. 155 patients out of 220 showed a successful mid-term outcome. The optimum cut-off of FAI-POPS was calculated to be 6.3 and with this threshold it proved a sensitivity of 0.66 and a specificity of 0.69, a positive predictive value of 0.84 and a negative predictive value of 0.46. The standard arthroscopic treatment of FAI resulted in satisfactory persistent symptom relief for about 70% of patients. No or minimal osteoarthritis, short time elapsed from the appearance of symptoms and high preoperative modified Harris Hip Score are independent predictive factors of SMO. The FAI-POPS is obtained as sum of 3 odds ratios corresponding to the above prognostic factors and is a useful predictor of mid-term outcome after conventional arthroscopic FAI treatment.

Arthroscopic Treatment of Acetabular Retroversion With Acetabuloplasty and Subspine Decompression: A Matched Comparison With Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Treatment for Focal Pincer-Type Femoroacetabular Impingement.

Background:Global acetabular retroversion is classically treated with open reverse periacetabular osteotomy. Given the low morbidity and recent success associated with the arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), there may also be a role for arthroscopic treatment of acetabular retroversion. However, the safety and outcomes after hip arthroscopic surgery for retroversion need further study, and the effect of impingement from the anterior inferior iliac spine (subspine) in patients with retroversion is currently unknown.Hypothesis:Arthroscopic treatment for global acetabular retroversion will be safe, and patients will have similar outcomes compared with a matched group undergoing arthroscopic treatment for focal pincer-type FAI.Study Design:Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.Methods:Patients undergoing hip arthroscopic surgery for symptomatic global acetabular retroversion were prospectively enrolled and compared with a matched group of patients undergoing arthroscopic surgery for focal pincer-type FAI. Both groups underwent the same arthroscopic treatment protocol. All patients were administered patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures, including the 12-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and a Mental Component Summary (MCS), modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain preoperatively and at 1 year postoperatively.Results:There were no differences in age, sex, or body mass index between 39 hips treated for global acetabular retroversion and 39 hips treated for focal pincer-type FAI. There were no major or minor complications in either group. Patients who underwent arthroscopic treatment for global acetabular retroversion demonstrated similar significant improvements in postoperative PRO scores (scores increased by 17 to 43 points) as patients who underwent arthroscopic treatment for focal pincer-type FAI. Patients treated for retroversion who also underwent subspine decompression had greater improvement than patients who did not undergo subspine decompression for the HOOS-Pain (33.7 ± 15.3 vs 22.5 ± 17.6, respectively; P = .046) and HOOS–Quality of Life (49.7 ± 18.8 vs 34.6 ± 22.0, respectively; P = .030) scores.Conclusion:Arthroscopic treatment for acetabular retroversion is safe and provides significant clinical improvement similar to arthroscopic treatment for pincer-type FAI. Patients with acetabular retroversion who also underwent arthroscopic subspine decompression demonstrated greater improvements in pain and quality of life outcomes than those who underwent arthroscopic treatment without subspine decompression.