Arthroplasty Group Research Articles

The efficacy of aspirin versus low-molecular-weight heparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after knee and hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of aspirin versus low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE) following hip and knee arthroplasty. PubMed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar databases were searched from inception till June 2024 for original trials investigating the outcomes of aspirin versus LMWH in hip and knee arthroplasty. The primary outcome was VTE. Secondary outcomes included minor and major bleeding events, and postoperative mortality within 90 days. This review was conducted per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A total of 7 randomized controlled trials with 12,134 participants were included. The mean ages for the aspirin and LMWH cohorts were 66.6 (57.6-69.0) years and 66.8 (57.9-68.9) years, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the overall risk of VTE between the aspirin and the LMWH cohorts (odds ratio [OR]: 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.48-1.89; p: 0.877). A subanalysis based on the specific VTE entity (pulmonary embolism [PE] or deep venous thrombosis) showed a significantly higher PE risk for patients receiving aspirin than the LMWH cohort (OR: 1.79; 95% CI: 1.11-2.89; p: 0.017). There was no difference in minor (OR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.40-1.04; p: 0.072) and major bleeding (OR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.40-1.47; p: 0.424) episodes across both groups. Furthermore, subanalysis among the total knee arthroplasty group showed that the aspirin cohort was significantly more likely to suffer VTEs than their LMWH counterparts (OR: 1.55; 95% CI: 1.21-1.98; p < 0.001). This study demonstrated a significantly higher risk of PE among patients receiving aspirin compared to LMWH following hip or knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. Aspirin was associated with a significantly higher overall VTE risk among patients undergoing knee arthroplasty, in particular. This might suggest the inferiority of aspirin compared to LMWH in preventing VTE following such procedures. Level I.

The spinopelvic alignment in patients with prior knee or hip arthroplasty undergoing elective lumbar surgery

BACKGROUND CONTEXTConcurrent degeneration of the lumbar spine, hip, and knee can cause significant disability and lower quality of life. Osteoarthritis in the lower extremities can lead to movement limitations, possibly requiring total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA). These procedures often impact spinal posture, causing alterations in spinopelvic alignment and lumbar spine degeneration. It is unclear if patients with a history of prior total joint arthroplasty (TJA) have different spinopelvic alignment compared to patients without. PURPOSETo assess the relationship between a history of previous THA or TKA, as well as combined THA and TKA, and the spinopelvic alignment in patients undergoing elective lumbar surgery for degenerative conditions. STUDY DESIGNA retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent lumbar surgery for degenerative conditions. The patients were stratified based on a history of TKA, THA, or both TKA and THA. PATIENT SAMPLEA total of 632 patients (63% female) with an average age of 64±11 years and an average BMI of 30±6 kg/m2 were included. OUTCOME MEASURESPatients were stratified based on a history of THA, TKA, or combined THA and TKA. Spinopelvic parameters (lumbar lordosis (LL), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), and pelvic incidence (PI)) were assessed. The relationship between spinopelvic alignment and prior TKA, THA or TKA and THA was analyzed METHODSThe data was tested for normal distribution using the Shapiro-Wilk test. We analyzed the relationship between the spinopelvic parameters and the different arthroplasty groups. Differences in scores between groups were examined using ANOVA. Tukey's Honestly Significant Difference test was used for pairwise comparison for significant ANOVA test results. Multivariable linear regression was applied, adjusted for age, sex and BMI. RESULTSA total of 632 patients (63% female) were included in the study. Of these patients, 74 (12%) had a history of isolated TKA, 40 (6%) had prior isolated THA, and 15 (2%) had TKA and THA prior to lumbar surgery. Patients with prior arthroplasty were predominantly female (59%) and significantly older (68±7 years vs. 63±12 years, p<.001) with a significantly higher BMI (31±6 kg/m2 vs. 29±6 kg/m2, p<.001). The LL was significantly lower (45.0°±13 vs. 50.9°±14 p=.011) in the arthroplasty group compared to the nonarthroplasty group. A history of isolated TKA was significantly associated with lower LL (Est=−3.8, 95% CI −7.3 to −0.3, p=.031) and SS (Est=−2.6, 95% CI −5.0 to −0.2, p=.012) compared to patients without TJA. Prior combined THA and TKA was found to be significantly associated with a higher PT compared to the nonarthroplasty group (Est=5.1, 95% CI 0.4–9.8, p=.034). CONCLUSIONThe spinopelvic alignment differs between patients with and without prior TJA who undergo elective lumbar surgery. The study shows that a history of TKA is significantly associated with a lower LL and SS. The combination of THA and TKA was associated with a significantly higher PT. These findings highlight the complex relationship between the hip, spine, and knee. Moreover, the results could aid in enhancing preoperative planning of lumbar surgery in patients with known TJA.

Comparative Study of Trapeziectomy with Weilby Suspensionplasty versus Implant Arthroplasty for Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint Arthritis in an Asian Population.

Background: This retrospective study compares the outcomes of trapeziectomy and Weilby suspensionplasty procedure versus implant arthroplasty using the TOUCH® prosthesis for basilar thumb arthritis in an Asian population. Methods: A total of 15 consecutive thumbs in 13 patients were included in this study. Six patients (2 male, 4 female, mean age of 62 years old) underwent trapeziectomy and Weilby suspensionplasty procedure. Seven patients (4 male, 3 female, mean age 63 years old) underwent implant CMCJ arthroplasty using the TOUCH® prosthesis. Data collected include demographics, severity of arthritis on plain radiographs of the thumb basilar joint, length of follow-up, pre- and postoperative pain levels, Kapandji thumb opposition score, grip and pinch strength and the time taken to return to work. Results: Patients in the trapeziectomy and Weilby suspensionplasty group had a mean follow-up of 4.5 months, while those in the TOUCH® implant arthroplasty group had a mean follow-up of 14 months. TOUCH® implant arthroplasty patients showed significantly higher grip strengths at 3 months post-surgery and a shorter return to work. There were no differences in pinch strength at 3 months, pinch or grip strength at 6 months or pain scores. Complications included prolonged scar hypersensitivity in two patients who underwent the Weilby suspensionplasty and a dislocated TOUCH® implant cup in one patient. Conclusions: Our study suggests that in the short term, CMCJ implant arthroplasty with the TOUCH® prosthesis produces results comparable to trapeziectomy and Weilby suspensionplasty. Level of Evidence: Level III (Therapeutic).

Simple Hip Value: a simple score to evaluate Hip function

BackgroundSeveral self-administered questionnaires are available for assessing hip function in clinical practice (HOOS-12, Oxford-12). These questionnaires can be used to assess and monitor patients with hip pathology. However, they are sometimes difficult to deploy in clinical practice. Recent studies on the shoulder and knee have shown that a single-question assessment provides a relevant evaluation of joint function, and correlates with more complex scores. However, this has not yet been evaluated for the hip. We set out to develop a single-question test that would enable patients to assess their hip function between 0 and 100. Therefore, we did a prospective study aiming to assess: (1) the relevance of the SHV (Simple Hip Value) test by comparing it with the Oxford-12 and HOOS-12 scores, (2) the discriminatory capacity and reproducibility of this test. HypothesisThe hypothesis of this study was that the assessment of hip function by a single-question patient-completed questionnaire (PROM) would be reliable and useful in clinical practice. Patients and methodsWe conducted a prospective study including 74 patients operated on for total hip arthroplasty from February 2020 to April 2021 in a high-volume center and 20 healthy subjects. The SHV questionnaire, as well as HOOS-12 and OXFORD-12 were submitted on average 18 months after surgery, with values scaled to 100 points. A second test containing the 3 questionnaires was resubmitted to 20 patients randomly chosen from hip arthroplasty group to evaluate the reproducibility of the test. To evaluate the discrimination capacity of our test, 20 controls were selected to respond to the three questionnaires. ResultsTest results were median SHV, Oxford-12 and HOOS-12 scores of 90/100 (Interquartile Range [IQR]: 80–95), 88.5 (IQR: 77.1–95.8) and 79.1 (IQR: 65.1–93.2), respectively. The SHV was strongly correlated with the Oxford-12 (Spearman coefficient: 0.63 [IQR: 0.45−0.76]) and the HOOS-12 (Spearman coefficient: 0.66 [IQR: 0.46−0.79]). The SHV differed significantly from the control group (90.0 vs 100.0 in the control group [p < 0.001]) and had excellent reproducibility (Interclass Correlation Coefficient [ICC]: ICC: 0.82 [CI95%, 0.59−0.93]). DiscussionThe SHV test seems to be a reliable, reproducible and discriminating tool for assessing hip function after total hip arthroplasty, thus offering a simplified and practical approach for practitioners. Further testing in different populations would be useful to validate this test. Level of evidenceIII; prospective comparative diagnostic study.

Valgus Osteotomy versus Arthroplasty for Ununited Femoral Neck Fractures: A Systematic Review

Abstract Background Fractures of the neck of femur in young adults tend, unlike their counterparts in older people, to be a relatively higher energy injury and require timely and meticulous diagnosis and management. Anatomical reduction and stable internal fixation are essentials for achieving the goals of treatment in this young population allowing preservation of the femoral head while minimizing rates of non-union and osteonecrosis. Aim of the Work The aim of this systematic review is to collate evidence from comparative studies to look for significant differences between valgas osteotomy &amp;arthroplasty in non united femoral neck fractures in &amp;lt; 50yr old patients. Patients and Methods Only studies with Randomized controlled trials and comparative non controlled trials had been included. The study included Valgas osteotomy &amp; arthroplasty for ununited femoral neck fractures. Application of inclusion and exclusion criteria to study Abstracts yielded 11articles. The full-text articles for these 40 studies were then reviewed and subjected to our inclusion criteria. A total of 11 articles were eligible for final systematic review. Results There was improvement in Harris hip score in all included studies ranged from 79.8 to 95. In comparison between two groups, groups with THA had significantly higher Harris hip score than osteotomy score. In this review reoperation and infection were common among osteotomy group than total hip arthroplasty group. Conclusion Although non-union problems following femoral neck fractures are common, the primary objective is to preserve the hip, by seeking alternative methods, specifically in young patients, and considering that the femoral neck can usually remain viable. Therefore, alternatives such as valgus osteotomy, which enables union by solving mechanical issues and allows patients to live with their own bones, have long been in use and successful Valgus intertrochanteric osteotomy is the treatment of choice for active patients aged less than 50 years with a nonunion of a femoral neck fracture. This technique requires precise preoperative planning and intraoperative skill. Patients should be warned of the risk of avascular necrosis, as well as the difficulty in performing revision arthroplasty in this setting.

Superior functional outcome following reverse shoulder arthroplasty compared to hemiarthroplasty for displaced three- and four-part fractures in patients 65 and older: results from a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial - The shoulder hemiarthroplasty or reverse polarity arthoplasty (SHeRPA) trial

BackgroundAcute unreconstructible 3- or 4-part proximal humerus fractures can be treated with hemiarthroplasty or reverse polarity shoulder arthroplasty. Randomized trials using implants from multiple different companies or uncemented implants have found superior results with reverse polarity arthroplasty. AimsThis study aims to determine whether cemented reverse polarity arthroplasty produces a superior outcome compared to cemented hemiarthroplasty using one implant system in patients aged 65 years and over at 12 months follow-up as measured with the Constant score. MethodsA prospective patient and assessor blinded multicenter randomized controlled trial was conducted of shoulder hemiarthroplasty or reverse polarity arthroplasty in patients aged 65 years and older with acute 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fracture not amenable to osteosynthesis. The primary outcome was the Constant score at 12 months with total follow-up to 24 months. Block randomization by site was undertaken using random number generation and sealed envelopes. Power analysis indicated that 17 patients were required in each arm to achieve 80% power with an alpha-value of 5%. Secondary outcome measures were the difference in the mean Constant Score, Quick Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (QuickDASH), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score and EQ5D-5L up to two years; differences in complication rate at one and two years; differences in revision and implant failure at one and two years. Results18 patients were randomized to hemiarthroplasty and 18 to reverse polarity arthroplasty across 4 sites. The primary outcome as measured by the Constant score at 12 months was better in the reverse polarity shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) group (Mean 51.1, s.d. 14.9) compared to the hemiarthroplasty (HA) group (mean 35.0, s.d. 13.5) (p=0.004). No significant difference was reported at 24 months but this may be due to high rates of attrition (22%). The mean EQ-5D-5L patient rated health status score was significantly higher in the RSA group compared to the HA group at 12 months. One hemiarthroplasty was revised due to implant uncoupling and one reverse polarity shoulder replacement was revised due to instability. No other complications were recorded. DiscussionTreatment of unreconstructible 3- or 4-part proximal humerus fractures with reverse polarity shoulder arthroplasty results in a superior outcome compared to shoulder hemiarthroplasty at 12 months measured with the Constant score with no increased risk of failure up to 24 months in patients age 65 years and over. High attrition rates are observed in this older population due to cognitive decline and death from other causes.

Complications and revisions in metal-backed anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a comparative study of revision rates between stemless and stemmed humeral components

BackgroundThe primary objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the incidence of complications and revision surgeries between in two of convertible metal-back glenoid systems in total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) groups over a follow-up period of up to five years. MethodsA retrospective analysis included 69 shoulders from 65 patients with primary aTSA. Patients were divided into Group 1 (n=31), receiving convertible cementless stemmed aTSA (Lima SMR) and Group 2 (n=38), receiving humeral head replacement aTSA (Arthrex, Eclipse) both with metal-back glenoid components. Clinical and radiological assessments were conducted at 2, 5, and 10 years postoperatively. Assessments included the following: Constant Score, DASH, SPADI, SSV, Glenohumeral Distance, Critical Shoulder Angle and Lateral Acromion Index. In addition, we compared complications, revision rates and survival rates between groups using Kaplan-Maier curves and Log-Rank-test. ResultsBaseline demographics and preoperative outcome scores showed no significant differences between groups (p≥0.05). The overall revision rate did not significantly differ between groups (Group 1:32% vs. Group 2:24%, p=0.60), nor did the mean time to revision (p=0.27). The mean follow-up was 71±41 months (Group 1: 94±48 months, Group 2: 53±23 months, p<0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed similar mid-term survival probabilities (p=0.94). Revision reasons included rotator cuff insufficiency (n=4 in Group 1, n=2 in Group 2) and glenoid wear/loosening (n=5 in Group 1, n=7 in Group 2). Interestingly, Group 1 demonstrated no occurrence of glenoid metal baseplate or humeral loosening, while complex revisions were more common in the Group 2. At 2 and 5 years, non-revised patients in both groups had similar outcome scores. ConclusionMetal-backed glenoid implants in combination with both stemless and stemmed humeral components in aTSA exhibit comparable revision rates and survival probabilities. Rotator cuff insufficiency and polyethylene wear are the two most common complications leading to revision. To facilitate ongoing monitoring and optimize patient safety, we implemented a modification in the follow-up protocol, transitioning to annual appointments or earlier when necessary. This study underscores the unsolved disadvantages in metal-back components and the importance of a mid- to long-term longitudinal assessment of those patients.

Metaphyseal trauma of the lower extremities in major orthopedic surgery as an independent risk factor for deep vein thrombosis

PurposeMajor orthopedic surgeries of the lower extremities, which heavily injure the metaphyseal region, are strongly associated with the risk of developing deep vein thrombosis (DVT). This study aims to investigate the role of metaphyseal trauma as an independent risk factor for DVT.MethodsPatients undergoing major orthopedic surgery of the hip and knee had their existing DVT risk factors recorded. Metaphyseal trauma was defined by the extent of bone injury during these surgeries. The samples were categorized into three surgery groups: total arthroplasty group (TA), hemiarthroplasty group (HA), and the open reduction internal fixation group (ORIF). Logistic regression test between significant existing risk factors and surgery groups determines the independent association between risk factors and DVT.ResultThe study found a 24.8% incidence of asymptomatic DVT in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgeries, with the highest prevalence (37.2%) in TA, which had the largest extent of metaphyseal trauma and the least existing DVT risk factors. TA showed 6.2 OR and 95% CI (p = 0.036) compared to the other existing risk factor in relation to DVT incidence.ConclusionMetaphyseal bone trauma in the hip and knee major orthopedic surgery is an independent risk factor for deep vein thrombosis.

Head-to-neck screw fixation and radial head arthroplasty result in similar postoperative outcomes for low-comminuted radial head fractures with neck involvement

Background Fixation of radial head fractures with neck involvement presents challenges. It remains unclear whether the outcomes of head-to-neck screw fixation are similar to those of arthroplasty in this scenario. We conducted a retrospective cohort study to evaluate the clinical outcomes of these two methods for treating such fractures. Methods Demographic data, fracture type, number of fragments, and concomitant injuries were recorded. Range of motion, Visual Analogue Scale for pain, Mayo Elbow Performance Score, and Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand at three-year follow-up, complications, and reintervention were compared. Results A total of 14 patients underwent fixation with head-to-neck screws, and 15 an arthroplasty. Baseline characteristics between groups were similar ( P &gt; .05). Satisfactory range of motion (arc &gt; 100°) was achieved in nine patients (64%) in the fixation group, and eight patients (53%) in the arthroplasty group ( P = .55). The mean Visual Analogue Scale, Mayo Elbow Performance Score, and Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand were 1.2 ± 1.2, 91.7 ± 10.7, and 9.1 ± 1, respectively, ( P = .651, P = .651, and P = .155). Three patients (21%) in the fixation group underwent a reintervention and three (20%) in the arthroplasty group ( P = .639). Discussion Head-to-neck screw fixation and radial head arthroplasty result in similar postoperative outcomes for low-comminuted radial head fractures with neck involvement.

Lumbar Facet Arthroplasty Versus Fusion for Grade-I Degenerative Spondylolisthesis with Stenosis: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

The comparative effectiveness of decompression plus lumbar facet arthroplasty versus decompression plus instrumented lumbar spinal fusion in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and grade-I degenerative spondylolisthesis is unknown. In this randomized, controlled, Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption trial, we assigned patients who had single-level lumbar spinal stenosis and grade-I degenerative spondylolisthesis to undergo decompression plus lumbar facet arthroplasty (arthroplasty group) or decompression plus fusion (fusion group). The primary outcome was a predetermined composite clinical success score. Secondary outcomes included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog scale (VAS) back and leg pain, Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ), Short Form (SF)-12, radiographic parameters, surgical variables, and complications. A total of 321 adult patients were randomized in a 2:1 fashion, with 219 patients assigned to undergo facet arthroplasty and 102 patients assigned to undergo fusion. Of these, 113 patients (51.6%) in the arthroplasty group and 47 (46.1%) in the fusion group who had either reached 24 months of postoperative follow-up or were deemed early clinical failures were included in the primary outcome analysis. The arthroplasty group had a higher proportion of patients who achieved composite clinical success than did the fusion group (73.5% versus 25.5%; p < 0.001), equating to a between-group difference of 47.9% (95% confidence interval, 33.0% to 62.8%). The arthroplasty group outperformed the fusion group in most patient-reported outcome measures (including the ODI, VAS back pain, and all ZCQ component scores) at 24 months postoperatively. There were no significant differences between groups in surgical variables or complications, except that the fusion group had a higher rate of developing symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration. Among patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and grade-I degenerative spondylolisthesis, lumbar facet arthroplasty was associated with a higher rate of composite clinical success than fusion was at 24 months postoperatively. Therapeutic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Outcomes of total elbow arthroplasty in the treatment of distal humeral fractures in the elderly: a retrospective cohort comparison between primary arthroplasty and arthroplasty secondary to failed internal fixation

BackgroundThe primary objective of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of total elbow arthroplasty as the index procedure in the treatment of traumatic distal humerus fractures, with secondary total elbow arthroplasty following failed internal fixation. The secondary objectives were to compare the complication rates and the radiographic results in the two groups. Our hypothesis was that the clinical results of total elbow arthroplasty performed secondarily to failed internal fixation were comparable to primary total elbow arthroplasty in the treatment of distal humerus fractures in the elderly population. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort comparison study, including 60 patients with a median age of 80 years (71-85), who either underwent a primary total elbow arthroplasty (group 1; 45 patients), or secondary total elbow arthroplasty following failed internal fixation (group 2; 15 patients), in the treatment of a post-traumatic supra and intercondylar fracture of the distal humerus, between January 2004 and January 2021. The clinical examination, including MEPS score and triceps proficiency test, complication rates and the need for re-operation were noted. The average clinical and radiographic follow-up was 40.8 months (24-120). ResultsThe clinical results of the two groups were comparable when looking at the MEPS score (90.00 [85.00, 100.00] p= 0.486). With regards to complications, there were 2 surgical site infections in group 1 and 3 in group 2 (p=0.099), 1 case of mechanical loosening of the humeral component in group 1 and 1 in group 2 (p= 0.448), and 1 patient with triceps insufficiency in group 1. ConclusionSecondary total elbow arthroplasty following failed internal fixation has shown good functional results, and a complication rate comparable to that of index total elbow arthroplasty in the treatment of articular fractures of the distal humerus in the elderly.

The prevalence of bilateral and ipsilateral radiographic osteoarthritis is high in White, Asian and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islanders presenting for unilateral knee or hip arthroplasty.

It is estimated that one-third of patients presenting with unilateral joint pain have contralateral osteoarthritis (OA) at first presentation. Most studies have primarily examined White patient cohorts. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of contralateral joint OA for patients presenting for unilateral total knee (TKA), unicompartmental knee (UKA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA) among Asian, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander and White patients. Bilateral radiographic reports at initial presentation of 2,312 subjects who underwent unilateral arthroplasties (332 UKAs, 933 TKAs and 1,047 THAs) were reviewed. The presence of contralateral OA was recorded and compared by racial group and type of arthroplasty performed. Parametric statistical analyses were performed to determine differences between groups. Multivariable analyses were completed for each arthroplasty group to determine the influence on the presence of contralateral OA, presented as odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Contralateral joint OA was present in 86.7%, 90.4% and 70.4% of UKA, TKA and THA patients, respectively. Concurrent hip OA was present in 41.6% and 59.5% of UKA and TKA patients. No racial differences in the prevalence of contralateral knee OA were found for knee arthroplasty patients. White patients (74.6%) had a greater prevalence of contralateral hip OA compared to Asians (66.5%, p = 0.037) amongst THA recipients. Increased age and body mass index were significantly associated with the presence of contralateral knee OA. Increased age, being male and being White were significant contributors for the presence of contralateral hip OA. The prevalence of contralateral joint OA and concurrent hip OA is high in all three racial groups. Due to the extensive prevalence of contralateral and concurrent knee and hip OA, bilateral radiographic evaluation should be considered for all patients presenting with unilateral hip or knee pain due to OA.

Reoperation-free survival after hip screws or hip arthroplasty for undisplaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly.

Our primary aim was to assess reoperation-free survival at one year after the index injury in patients aged ≥ 75 years treated with internal fixation (IF) or arthroplasty for undisplaced femoral neck fractures (uFNFs). Secondary outcomes were reoperations and mortality analyzed separately. We retrieved data on all patients aged ≥ 75 years with an uFNF registered in the Swedish Fracture Register from 2011 to 2018. The database was linked to the Swedish Arthroplasty Register and the National Patient Register to obtain information on comorbidity, mortality, and reoperations. Our primary outcome, reoperation, or death at one year was analyzed using restricted mean survival time, which gives the mean time to either event for each group separately. Overall, 3,909 patients presenting with uFNFs were included. Of these patients, 3,604 were treated with IF and 305 with primary arthroplasty. There were no relevant differences in age, sex, or comorbidities between groups. In the IF group 58% received cannulated screws and 39% hook pins. In the arthroplasty group 81% were treated with hemiarthroplasty and 19% with total hip arthroplasty. At one year, 32% were dead or had been reoperated in both groups. The reoperation-free survival time over one year of follow-up was 288 days (95% confidence interval (CI) 284 to 292) in the IF group and 279 days (95% CI 264 to 295) in the arthroplasty group, with p = 0.305 for the difference. Mortality was 26% in the IF group and 31% in the arthroplasty group at one year. Reoperation rates were 7.1% in the IF group and 2.3% in the arthroplasty group. In older patients with a uFNF, reoperation-free survival at one year seems similar, regardless of whether IF or arthroplasty is the primary surgery. However, this comparison depends on the choice of follow-up time in that reoperations were more common after IF. In contrast, we found more early deaths after arthroplasty. Our study calls for a randomized trial comparing these two methods.

Mobility following femoral neck fracture surgery: Does surgical treatment affect outcome?

BACKGROUND: Hip fractures are a life changing injury for many; often patients sustaining a hip fracture do not regain their pre-injury function. Early rehabilitation improves patient outcomes (e.g. Mobility, independence &amp; function). OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate whether patients with hip fracture progressed differently depending on their surgery type, specifically whether arthroplasty or internal fixation (IF) was employed as part of the surgical management. METHODS: A prospective audit was completed on hip fracture patients presenting to our unit between October 2019 and October 2020 who received surgical intervention for their fracture. The audit collected data on patient outcomes, specifically Timed Up and Go scores (TUG), Discharge destination and Cumulative Ambulatory Scores. The study group comprised 89 patients with femoral neck fractures (60 females, 29 males). The average age was 77 (range 50–96) years. Sixty-nine patients were managed with an arthroplasty, 20 patients were managed with IF. RESULTS: Results from this audit highlighted that at discharge, TUG scores had improved in both groups with the arthroplasty group completing their TUG in a mean of 46 seconds (median 39 seconds) and the IF group in a mean of 55.7 seconds (median 46 seconds). Eleven (55%) of the patients treated with IF were discharged home directly, while 26 (38%) of the patients treated with an arthroplasty were discharged home directly. Hip fracture patients treated with arthroplasty had lower functional ability on day one post-operatively based on the CAS. Patients treated with arthroplasty showed greater improvement in function and mobility at the time of discharge when compared to the IF group. A greater proportion of the IF group were discharged directly home (55% vs 38%) and able to receive any ongoing rehabilitation as an outpatient while a greater portion of the arthroplasty group required further inpatient rehabilitation (35% vs 48%). CONCLUSION: This audit indicated that irrespective of surgical intervention (Arthroplasty or IR) there is little difference in patient outcomes in the post-operative period.

Comparison between Cases of Total Hip Arthroplasty Followed by Colonna Capsular Arthroplasty and Lorenz Cast Reduction in Patients with Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.

Most patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) now receive closed-reduction treatment within 6 months after birth. The long-term outcomes of patients with late-detection DDH have remained unclear. We reviewed the clinical records of 18 patients who underwent Colonna capsular arthroplasty (n=8) or closed reduction (n=10) for developmental dysplasia of the hip as infants or young children and underwent total hip arthroplasty approximately in midlife. Both the Colonna capsular arthroplasty and closed reduction groups achieved good clinical results after total hip arthroplasty. However, the operating time was longer and the improvements of hip range of motion and clinical score were significantly worse in the Colonna capsular arthroplasty group than in the closed reduction group.

Comparison of functional outcome between Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty and total Hip Arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients

Objectives: The intention of this study to compare functional outcomes between Total Hip Arthroplasty and Bipolar Hemi Arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fracture after 3 months and 1 year from injury in elderly patients. Methods: Prospectively 43 patients were enrolled in this study, ages more than 60, twenty-four of them managed by Total Hip Arthroplasty, and 19 were managed by Bipolar Hemi Arthroplasty. These patients were followed up postoperatively for one year, at (3 and 12 months), to compare functional outcomes using Haris Hip Score. Results: Duration of operation was significantly higher in Total Hip Arthroplasty (98.54 min) versus (62.63 min) in the Bipolar Hemi Arthroplasty group, and intra-operative blood loss also considerably higher in Total Hip Arthroplasty (322.5 ml) than Bipolar Hemi Arthroplasty (178.42 ml). Regarding complications, there is no difference between the two groups; however, the incidence of mortality higher in the Bipolar Hemi Arthroplasty population. Average Haris Hip Score, pain and the motion were significantly better after three months and one-year follow-up in the Total Hip Arthroplasty group. The function was nearly the same at both groups after three months but after one-year of follow-up function significantly better (p-value &lt;0.5) in the Total Hip Arthroplasty patients.Conclusion: Total Hip Arthroplasty provides better functional outcomes after three months and one year of follow-up than Bipolar Hemi Arthroplasty when used to manage femoral neck fracture for active old age patients. Bipolar Hemi Arthroplasty may be suitable for older inactive patients with narrow life expectancy with multiple comorbiditie

Comparison of Loss of Bone Height Following Total Ankle Arthroplasty Versus Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis

Ankle arthrodesis and total ankle arthroplasty are both well-accepted surgical treatment options for end-stage ankle arthrosis. However, total ankle arthroplasty has gained popularity as the survivability of implants is improving. It is understood that there is loss of bone height following tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis, but to our knowledge, this has not been investigated in the setting of total ankle arthroplasty. A retrospective radiographic review was conducted over a 5-year period. We investigated all patients who underwent a tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis or total ankle arthroplasty for treatment of ankle arthritis by a single fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeon. The anterior and posterior height measurements were measured on preoperative and postoperative lateral radiographs. Differences between preoperative and postoperative heights were analyzed through a series of analyses of covariance. One-hundred thirty three patients and 143 operative extremities were included: 71 operative extremities in the tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis group (mean age 55.5 +/- 13.3 years, BMI 32.2 +/- 7.9) and 72 in the total ankle arthroplasty group (mean age 65.4 +/- 9.5, years, BMI 30.7 +/- 6.4). Statistical analysis demonstrated a loss of height in the tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis group, and an increased anterior and posterior height in the total ankle arthroplasty group. However, when comparing the arthroplasty group and arthrodesis group only the anterior height measurement reached statistical significance when stratified by gender (P< 0.001). The potential change in height is an important factor to consider during surgical planning as a limb length discrepancy may result.

Disparities Associated With Total Joint Arthroplasty Transfusion Rates

BackgroundInfections, readmissions, and mortalities after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) are serious complications, and transfusions have been associated with increased complication rates following TJA. Certain populations, including women, Black patients, patients who have public insurance and older adults have higher risks of transfusion. Recently, there has been a decline in transfusion rates and a greater emphasis on equity in medicine. This study examined whether disparities in transfusion rates still exist and what variables influence rates over time. MethodsWe used a health care system database to identify 5,435 total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and 2,105 total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients from 2013 to 2021. Transfusion rates were 2.9 and 3.1% in the TKA and THA arthroplasty groups, respectively. White race represented 67.1 and 69.8% of the TKA and THA groups, respectively. Fisher exact and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare categorical and continuous variables. Multivariable logistic regressions were performed to predict transfusion rates within 5 days of surgery and adjust for potential confounders. ResultsTransfusion rates declined over time. However, Black patients had a higher rate of transfusion than White patients despite similar hemoglobin levels, 5.1 versus 1.8% (P < .001) in the TKA group and 4.1 versus 2.7% (P = .103) in the THA group. Following adjustment, the biggest factor associated with a higher transfusion risk in the TKA group was being Black (adjusted odds ratio = 2.2, 95% confidence interval = 1.55 to 3.13). ConclusionsTransfusion rates for TJA patients are declining; however, Black patients continued to receive transfusions at higher rates in patients receiving TKA.

Outcomes of single- vs two-stage primary joint arthroplasty for septic arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Septic arthritis (SA) is an intra-articular infection caused by purulent bacteria and the only effective method is surgical intervention. Two-stage arthroplasty is considered the gold standard treatment for SA, but recent studies have found that single-stage arthroplasty can achieve the same efficacy as two-stage arthroplasty. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of single- vs two-stage arthroplasty in the treatment of (acute or quiescent) SA. The review process was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, and Cochrane Library databases to identify all literature on the treatment of SA using single- and two-stage arthroplasty from the date of database inception to November 10, 2022. Data on reinfection rates were expressed as odds ratios and 95% CIs. Seven retrospective studies with a total of 413 patients were included. Pooled analysis showed no difference in the reinfection rate between single- and two-stage arthroplasty. Subgroup analysis found no difference between the single- and two-stage arthroplasty groups in the incidence of purulent infection of the hip and knee. Cumulative meta-analysis showed gradual stabilization of outcomes. Based on our meta-analysis of available retrospective studies, we found no significant difference in reinfection rates between single- and two-stage arthroplasty for SA. Further prospective cohort studies are needed to confirm our results, although our meta-analysis provides important insights into the current literature on this topic.

Arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears: A comparative clinical study.

This study aimed to compare the clinical and functional outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus arthroscopic supe- rior capsular reconstruction in the treatment of patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears and Hamada grade 1-2 glenohumeral arthritis. It is a retrospective case-control study comparing the prospective results of 2 different treatment methods. This retrospective comparison of groups was conducted between May 2016 and May 2020. The study included 40 people with massive irreparable rotator cuff tear and Hamada grade 1-2 arthropathy who had arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction with tensor fascia latae autograft or reverse shoulder arthroplasty surgery. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to treatment. Clinical outcome measures included shoulder range of motion, pain, and functional scores (Constant-Murley, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons). The mean age was 61.85 ± 7.56 and 71.10 ± 6.42 years, respectively, for group I [superior capsular reconstruction (n=20)] and group II [superior capsular reconstruction (n=20)]. The mean follow-up was 22.30 ± 8.4 and 32.50 ± 8.11 months, respectively. In the postoperative data, flexion degrees and Constant scores were significantly higher in the superior capsular reconstruction group (P=.007, P = .043). No significant difference was found between the 2 groups in all parameters (P > .05) except abduction. The increase in abduction value in the reverse shoulder arthroplasty group was significantly higher than in the superior capsular reconstruction group (P = .003). In addition, postoperative data in all parameters in both groups showed significant changes compared to preoperatively. This study has shown that superior capsular reconstruction with tensor fascia latae autograft can provide clinical and func- tional improvement similar to the reverse shoulder arthroplasty procedure in treating massive irreparable rotator cuff tears with Hamada grade 1-2 arthropathy. Level III, Therapeutic Study.