Artery Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction Research Articles

Muscle-splitting approach to thoracoacromial vein for superdrainage in deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction.

Thoracoacromial vein (TAv) is seldomly considered as a secondary outflow recipient option when venous congestion of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is encountered. The purpose of this study was to present a computed tomography (CT)-based anatomy and a method of approaching TAv in performing superdrainage using superficial inferior epigastric vein (SIEV) in DIEP flap breast reconstruction. For CT-based anatomical study, 42 thoracoacromial vessels (TAV) of 21 patients who underwent DIEP flap breast reconstruction were analyzed. From November 2016 to May 2018, pectoralis major (PM) muscle splitting approach to TAv in the first intercostal space was applied to 7 patients who required superdrainage via SIEV. TAVs at mid-first intercostal space (ICS) were located 83.5 ± 9.8 mm lateral to the sternal border (H), 41.5 ± 12.9 mm below the clavicle (V), and 11.7 ± 3.2 mm deep to the outer surface of PM muscle (D). Mean oblique distances from TAV to internal mammary vessels in the 2nd and 3rd ICS were 75.7 ± 9.7 mm and 98.2 ± 10.9 mm, respectively. Seven DIEP flaps presenting intraoperative venous congestion were successfully salvaged intraoperatively with superdrainge procedure. TAvs were harvested without cutting the PM muscle in any patient. Their mean size at anastomosis was 1.61 ± 3.2 mm (range, 0.9-2.5 mm). All flaps survived without perfusion-related complications including fat necrosis. Harvest of TAv by muscle-splitting approach is an alternative option when additional venous anastomosis using SIEV is mandated for managing venous congestion of DIEP flap.

Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction in Women With Previous Abdominal Incisions: A Comparison of Complication Rates.

The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is currently the most widely used method for autologous microsurgical breast reconstruction. There are mixed data in the literature regarding the impact of previous abdominal surgery on DIEP flap success in breast reconstruction. With this study, we take a closer look at the effect of prior abdominal surgery on DIEP flap and donor-site complications, with a particular focus on the different types of incisions and their influence on surgical outcomes. A retrospective cohort study was conducted over a 6-year period. Five hundred forty-four consecutive DIEP flaps were divided into a control group (321 flaps) without previous abdominal surgery and an incision group (223 flaps) with previous abdominal surgery. A comparison between both groups was made in terms of flap and donor-site complications followed by a subgroup analysis based on single types of abdominal incisions. There were no significant differences between both groups in terms of age, body mass index, flap weight, smoking history, prior radiotherapy, diabetes, and coagulopathy (P > 0.05). The most common incision was low transverse incision (n = 116) followed by laparoscopy port (n = 103) and midline (n = 46) incisions. We found no significant differences between the control group and incision group in terms of flap complications. Subgroup analysis revealed that none of the 3 types of incision increase the flap or donor-site complications. Smoking and flap weight were the only 2 independent predictors for donor-site complications. The results from this large series of consecutive DIEP flaps from our institution confirm that autologous breast reconstruction with DIEP flap can be safely performed in patients who have had previous abdominal surgeries; however, counseling patients about smoking is critical to avoid potential donor-site complications.

Preoperative Analysis of Venous Anatomy Before Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Free-Flap Breast Reconstruction Using Ferumoxytol-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography.

Venous congestion after deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction is a complication that may be partially attributable to variations in venous abdominal wall anatomy. In previous work, we have shown that ferumoxytol may be used as a bloodpool contrast agent to perform high-resolution venous imaging. Our current aim was to use this technology to perform a detailed analysis of the venous anatomy among patients undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction. All patients undergoing DIEP flap reconstruction with preoperative ferumoxytol-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (FE-MRA) were retrospectively reviewed. A detailed anatomic analysis of each abdominal wall on FE-MRAwas performed before review of operative findings. Statistical analysis was used to determine venous characteristics associated with superficial inferior epigastric vein (SIEV) augmentation. From 2012 to 2016, 59 patients underwent preoperative FE-MRA. This resulted in imaging for 118 hemiabdomen and 99 flaps. Superficial-deep communication was identified in 117 of 118 hemiabdomen. Fifty (93%) of 59 patients had greater than 1-mm venous communication of the superficial system across midline. Reconstructed breasts were based on dominant medial row perforators in 82 (83%) of 99 flaps. The mean diameters of the SIEVand dominant venous perforator were 3.8 and 2.8mm, respectively. Anatomic characteristics associated with SIEVaugmentation included SIEVdiameter ( P = 0.01), dominant perforator diameter ( P = 0.04), and the ratio between these 2 variables ( P = 0.001). Ferumoxytol-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography provides excellent imaging of the venous system. Anatomic characteristics such as the diameter of the SIEVand the diameter of the dominant perforator may be useful in determining which flaps require venous augmentation using the SIEV.

Complications following immediate compared to delayed deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstructions

PurposeAs more breast cancer patients opt for immediate breast reconstruction, the incidence of complications should be evaluated. The aim of this study was to analyze the recipient-site complications and flap re-explorations of immediate compared to delayed deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstructions.MethodsFor this multicenter retrospective cohort study, the medical records of all patients who underwent DIEP flap breast reconstruction in three hospitals in the Netherlands between January 2010 and June 2017 were reviewed. Patient demographics, risk factors, timing of reconstruction, recipient-site complications, and flap re-explorations were recorded.ResultsA total of 910 DIEP flap breast reconstructions (n = 397 immediate and n = 513 delayed reconstructions) in 737 patients were included. There were no significant differences in major complications or flap re-explorations between immediate and delayed reconstructions. The total flap failure rate was 1.5 and 2.5% in the immediate and delayed group, respectively. Significantly more hematomas (OR 2.91; 95% CI 1.59–5.30; p = 0.001) and seromas (OR 3.60; 95% CI 1.14–11.4; p = 0.029) occurred in immediate reconstructions, whereas wound problems were more frequently observed in delayed reconstructions (OR 1.99; 95% CI 1.27–3.11; p = 0.003). Correction for potential confounders still showed significant differences for hematoma and seroma, but no longer for wound problems (p = 0.052).ConclusionsThis study demonstrated similar incidences of major recipient-site complications and flap re-explorations between immediate and delayed DIEP flap breast reconstructions. However, hematoma and seroma occurred significantly more often in immediate reconstructions, while wound problems were more frequently observed in delayed reconstructions.

Intraoperative objective evaluation of venous congestion in deep epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction: A pilot study.

In a deep epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction, the necessity of additional anastomosis of the superficial inferior epigastric vein (SIEV) should be determined intraoperatively. The purpose of this pilot study is to propose a method to detect venous congestion intraoperatively using the blood glucose measurement index (BGMI). In 70 DIEP flaps of 67 patients for breast reconstruction, the ratio of blood glucose content in the flap to systemic blood glucose (BGMI) was measured immediately after wound closure. Eight flaps in which BGMI was less than 0.8 were categorized into the low BGMI group, and additional venous anastomosis using SIEV was conducted. The other 62 flaps were categorized into the normal BGMI group. Perioperative objective color difference of the flap calculated using the L*a*b* color coordinate scale was recorded simultaneously. Correlation between BGMI and color difference was analyzed. In all flaps in the low BGMI group, SIEV diameter was increased; after additional anastomosis, the BGMI significantly improved (from 0.71±0.05 to 0.94±0.05, P<.01). There was a significant correlation between BGMI and color difference (P=.04). The determination coefficient was 0.265. When a BGMI of less than 0.8 was assumed to be a true positive, the area under the curve of color difference in the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.82. BGMI immediately after wound closure may be useful to detect initial signs of venous congestion. Intraoperative objective color difference also reflects venous congestion; however, it is not highly accurate.

Concordance between preoperative computed tomography angiographic mapping and intraoperative perforator selection for deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstructions.

Preoperative imaging for perforator identification prior to a deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap elevation for breast reconstruction has many advantages. Currently, computed tomography (CT) angiography provides good visualization of the perforators and their course, and is thus the imaging technique of choice. The primary aim of this study was to determine the concordance between the perforators identified preoperatively and the perforators ultimately selected intraoperatively, with a standardized protocol, in a single institution. Secondly, we wanted to compare our results with those of other, similar studies and, thirdly, to identify those factors that may lead to a higher concordance. A retrospective review was undertaken of a case series of 49 consecutive patients undergoing unilateral autologous breast reconstruction with a DIEP flap at the Gelre Hospital, in the Netherlands, over a 4-year period from 2013 to 2017. The preoperative identification and selection of perforator number and location with the aid of CT angiography scanning were compared to the intraoperative findings and preference. Our study revealed a concordance of 67.3% between one or more perforators advised preoperatively by the radiologist and chosen intraoperatively by the surgeon. We identified significant differences in our protocol compared to others. The study confirmed the benefit to both the patient and the surgeon when preoperative CT angiography is used. Scanning protocols may vary considerably and should thus be carefully scrutinized before future comparisons are made. Based on this study, the scanning range, method of selecting perforators and timing of image acquisition may have to be optimized for future prospective clinical trials.

Patient-Reported Outcomes for Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction in the Severely Obese

Patient-Reported Outcomes for Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction in the Severely Obese

DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction in Patients with Breast Ptosis: 2-Stage Reconstruction Using 3-Dimensional Surface Imaging and a Printed Mold.

Background:Autologous breast reconstruction can be performed for breasts with ptosis to a certain extent, but if patients desire to correct ptosis, mastopexy of the contralateral breast is indicated. However, accurate prediction of post-mastopexy breast shape is difficult to make, and symmetrical breast reconstruction requires certain experience. We have previously reported the use of three-dimensional (3D) imaging and printing technologies in deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction. In the present study, these technologies were applied to the reconstruction of breasts with ptosis.Methods:Eight breast cancer patients with ptotic breasts underwent two-stage unilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction. In the initial surgery, tissue expander (TE) placement and contralateral mastopexy are performed simultaneously. Four to six months later, 3D bilateral breast imaging is performed after confirming that the shape of the contralateral breast (post-mastopexy) is somewhat stabilized, and a 3D-printed breast mold is created based on the mirror image of the shape of the contralateral breast acquired using analytical software. Then, DIEP flap surgery is performed, where the breast mold is used to determine the required flap volume and to shape the breast mound.Results:All flaps were engrafted without any major perioperative complications during both the initial and DIEP flap surgeries. Objective assessment of cosmetic outcome revealed that good breast symmetry was achieved in all cases.Conclusions:The method described here may allow even inexperienced surgeons to achieve reconstruction of symmetrical, non-ptotic breasts with ease and in a short time. While the requirement of two surgeries is a potential disadvantage, our method will be particularly useful in cases involving TEs, i.e., delayed reconstruction or immediate reconstruction involving significant skin resection.

Seguridad y complicaciones en reconstrucción mamaria autóloga con colgajo DIEP: una revisión sistemática

Autologous free flap breast reconstruction may be associated with complications related to the flap and the donor site. Our objective was to evaluate the reported evidence on safety, complications and risk factors in patients undergoing deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap (DIEP) breast reconstruction. A systematic review was conducted based on a Medline search for studies published between September 1995 and September 2015. Demographic data, flap dimensions and complication rates were recorded including total flap necrosis, partial flap necrosis and fat necrosis. A total of 34 clinical studies including 35 case series, 2,761 patients and 3,927 DIEP flaps were identified. The mean body mass index was higher than 24.5kg/m2 whereas the obesity rate was above 14.5%. None of the articles reported flap weight, area or volume after molding. Total and partial flap necrosis rates were 1.9% (75/3,811) and 2.6% (68/2,575), respectively. Fat necrosis was diagnosed in 8.2% (308/3,746) of flaps with a standard deviation of 6.9. Reoperation was required in 5.5% (107/1,940) of the flaps. The incidence of hematoma in the recipient site and abdominal hernia or bulge formation was 3% (59/1,952 flaps and 52/1,725 patients). In conclusion, the occurrence of complications in breast reconstruction by autologous DIEP flap was low, although the occurrence of fat necrosis ranged widely.

An innovative method of planning and displaying flap volume in DIEP flap breast reconstructions

Determining the ideal volume of the harvested flap to achieve symmetry in deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstructions is complex. With preoperative imaging techniques such as 3D stereophotogrammetry and computed tomography angiography (CTA) available nowadays, we can combine information to preoperatively plan the optimal flap volume to be harvested. In this proof-of-concept, we investigated whether projection of a virtual flap planning onto the patient's abdomen using a projection method could result in harvesting the correct flap volume. In six patients (n=9 breasts), 3D stereophotogrammetry and CTA data were combined from which a virtual flap planning was created comprising perforator locations, blood vessel trajectory and flap size. All projected perforators were verified with Doppler ultrasound. Intraoperative flap measurements were collected to validate the determined flap delineation volume. The measured breast volume using 3D stereophotogrammetry was 578±127cc; on CTA images, 527±106cc flap volumes were planned. The nine harvested flaps weighed 533±109g resulting in a planned versus harvested flap mean difference of 5±27g (flap density 1.0g/ml). In 41 out of 42 projected perforator locations, a Doppler signal was audible. This proof-of-concept shows in small numbers that flap volumes can be included into a virtual DIEP flap planning, and transferring the virtual planning to the patient through a projection method results in harvesting approximately the same volume during surgery. In our opinion, this innovative approach is the first step in consequently achieving symmetric breast volumes in DIEP flap breast reconstructions.

Predicting and planning for SIEA flap utilisation in breast reconstruction: An algorithm combining pre-operative computed tomography analysis and intra-operative angiosome assessment

Low flap complication rates and excellent aesthetic outcomes are now commonplace in breast reconstruction. As a result, attention is now being focussed on minimising donor site morbidity. Despite its potential donor site advantages, the superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap is often discounted, given concerns about the high flap failure rates. In this study, we present our experience of using the SIEA flap in breast reconstruction and provide an algorithm based on pre-operative computed tomography angiography (CTA) to aid pre-operative planning. A retrospective analysis of SIEA flap breast reconstruction cases performed at our unit between 2009 and 2016 was performed and outcomes were assessed. In addition, the patients' pre-operative CTA images were assessed and compared to those of a matched group of patients who underwent deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction. Twenty-six patients who underwent SIEA flap breast reconstruction were eligible for inclusion. No flaps were lost. Donor site seroma rate was 20%. The largest SIEA diameter in those who underwent an SIEA flap was significantly larger (p=0.0001) than in those who underwent DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Significantly more number of patients who underwent SIEA flap breast reconstruction had a SIEA diameter greater than or equal to that of the largest DIEP flap perforator (p=0.0001) in the group where a DIEP flap was used for breast reconstruction. High success rates can be achieved with abdominal flaps based on the superficial vascular system and careful pre- and perioperative assessment of patients.

The Influence of a Pfannenstiel Scar on Venous Anatomy of the Lower Abdominal Wall and Implications for Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction.

A Pfannenstiel incision involves the obstruction of superficial venous pathways and functional diversion of flow through alternative pathways and adjacent vessels. This study investigated the effect of a prior Pfannenstiel incision on venous anatomy of the lower abdominal wall; specifically, the superficial inferior epigastric vein (SIEV), using computed tomographic angiography. A case-control study was performed of 50 patients with Pfannenstiel scars and 50 age-matched, body mass index-matched control patients without Pfannenstiel scars. The authors compared the number of direct/indirect and total communications between the SIEV and deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) venae comitantes, midline crossover, and other SIEV-related anatomical changes by using computed tomographic angiography. Flap-related clinical outcomes and donor-site-related complications were also assessed. The median number of direct and total communications between the SIEV and DIEP venae comitantes in the study group was greater than in the control group. The percentage of SIEVs having more than two branching patterns per hemiabdomen was significantly higher in the study group than in the control group. The study group also showed a significantly lower rate of fat necrosis compared with the control group (p = 0.03). The rate of donor-site seroma was significantly higher in the study group. This study suggests that the presence of a Pfannenstiel scar may promote the development of direct and total communications between the SIEV and DIEP venae comitantes and branching within the SIEV in the lower abdominal wall, which may facilitate venous drainage of adipose tissue in DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Risk, II.

Abstract: 8.50 Displaying Inguinal Lymph Nodes Before Transplantation In A Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction Using An Innovative Projection Method

INTRODUCTION: Lymphedema of the arm is a common postoperative complication as a result of breast cancer surgery. One of the surgical treatments comprises modification of a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction to facilitate additional lymph node transplantation from the inguinal area. Using computed tomography angiography (CTA), the distribution of these lymph nodes can be assessed. A virtual planning based on this CTA created for the DIEP flap is presented, with the inguinal lymph nodes included, followed by preoperatively projecting this information on the patients’ abdomen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of ten patients underwent the standard imaging protocol: A preoperative CTA to assess the vascular anatomy of the lower abdomen. A three-dimensional (3D) model of the blood vessels was produced, and the inguinal lymph nodes in this reconstruction were included. Preoperative projection of the 3D model onto the patients’ abdomen and inguinal area was performed, followed by tracing of this image. Intra-operatively found lymph nodes were identified by touch and compared with the markings on the skin. RESULTS: In all ten patients the preoperatively indicated lymph nodes were found within a one-centimeter radius. According to expert opinion, these lymph nodes were more easily identified in the subcutaneous fat than without using the projection method. CONCLUSIONS: Virtual planning of lymph node transplantations in a deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction seems feasible and can be performed quickly. This additional visual support aids the surgeon in locating the lymph nodes in the inguinal area. 9.00- 9.30 Keynote Lecture 3 THE SCIENCE OF TISSUE EXPANSION Alex MARGULIS Hadassah, Israel 9.50–11.10 SESSION 7 – ANGIOGENESIS, WOUND HEALING & BURNS Moderators Aernout LUTTUN Laurence BOON

90. Neurotisation in deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstructions: Our technique and results

90. Neurotisation in deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstructions: Our technique and results

84. Complications in primary versus secondary deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstructions: A multicentre study

84. Complications in primary versus secondary deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstructions: A multicentre study

Lumbar Artery Perforator Flap: An Anatomical Study Using Multidetector Computed Tomographic Scan and Surgical Pearls for Breast Reconstruction.

Breast reconstruction with the lumbar artery perforator flap is indicated in patients with unfavorable abdominal donor site. In addition to their clinical experience with lumbar artery perforator free flap breast reconstruction, the authors present an anatomical study of the origin and course of the perforators. Images of multidetector computerized tomography scans were used to visualize the location of the dominant lumbar artery perforator in 20 patients. The medical files of the authors' patients who underwent lumbar artery perforator flap breast reconstruction were also analyzed. Multidetector computed tomographic imaging in 20 female patients with a mean age of 47 years revealed an equal number of dominant perforators (10 left and 10 right); 60 percent were third lumbar artery perforators, 30 percent were fourth, and the remaining were second. The dominant perforators were mainly located 42.6 mm from the y axis at their origin at the transverse process, and 69.5 mm when emerging in the subcutaneous tissue. Six patients had nine successful lumbar artery perforator flaps for breast reconstruction. Average operative time was 270 minutes. Due to shortness of pedicle and mismatching between diameter of lumbar artery and internal mammary artery, vascular bypass (harvested from the deep inferior epigastric vessels) was required in 50 percent of the cases. The major complication at the donor site was seroma (80 percent). The lumbar artery perforator has a constant anatomical location. The free lumbar artery perforator flap provides an ample amount of tissue for breast reconstruction; however, its major disadvantages are the small artery diameter, shortness of the pedicle, and high seroma rate at the donor site. Therapeutic, IV.

Contralateral breast symmetrisation in unilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction

Women undergoing unilateral deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction may be offered a contralateral symmetrisation either at the time of reconstruction (simultaneous/immediate) or at a later stage (delayed). Simultaneous contralateral breast symmetrisation may be more beneficial to patients and healthcare institutions by avoiding staged surgery, although there is limited evidence on which to base practice. This deficit formed the rationale for our study. The primary outcome was the overall rate of revision surgery. Over a 6-year period, this prospective cohort study recorded the demographics, cancer treatments and operative outcomes of all consecutive unilateral DIEP flap breast reconstructions with or without contralateral symmetrising surgery. Patients were categorised into three groups: (1) simultaneous symmetrisation, 2) delayed symmetrisation and (3) no symmetrisation for comparative analysis. During the study period, 371 women underwent unilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction 194 (52.3%) were not symmetrised, 155 (41.8%) were simultaneously symmetrised and 22 (5.9%) underwent delayed symmetrisation. Simultaneous symmetrisation of the contralateral breast and unilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction increased the mean total operative time by 28min. There were no differences in the rates of peri-operative complications. There were significantly higher rates of all-cause revision surgery (OR 3.97 [1.58, 9.94], p=0.003) in women undergoing delayed symmetrisation, because of higher rates of revision lipomodelling, scar revision and revision contralateral symmetrisation. Simultaneous contralateral breast symmetrisation was associated with a lower risk of all-cause revision surgery. It is safe, beneficial and likely to be more cost-effective for women undergoing unilateral free DIEP flap breast reconstruction.

Complications in unilateral versus bilateral deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstructions: A multicentre study

The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is the first choice for autologous breast reconstruction. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to analyse the recipient- and donor-site complications and compare them between unilateral and bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstructions. Between January 2010 and December 2014, 530 DIEP flap reconstructions were performed in 426 consecutive patients in three Dutch hospitals. Major and minor complications were categorised into recipient- and donor-site complications. Post-operative flap re-explorations were recorded. Of the total 530 DIEP flap reconstructions performed (322 unilateral, 104 bilateral), recipient-site complications were major in 9.8% and minor in 20.2%. The patients developed fat necrosis (unilateral 14.0% vs. bilateral 7.7%; OR 1.950; 95% CI 1.071-3.550; p=0.027) and infection (unilateral 5.6% vs. bilateral 1.9%; OR 3.020; 95% CI 1.007-9.052; p=0.039) at the recipient site significantly more frequently in the unilateral DIEP flap reconstructions. The donor-site complications were major in 0.9% and minor in 19.5% of the cases. Body mass index (BMI) was significantly associated with complications (donor site: OR 1.137; 95% CI 1.075-1.201; p<0.001, recipient site: OR 1.073; 95% CI 1.009-1.142; p=0.026). Flap re-explorations were performed in 5.7% (n=30) of the cases. Total flap loss occurred in 3.0% (n=16) of the cases. Bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstructions can be performed with the same percentage of complications and re-explorations as unilateral reconstructions and even result in less fat necrosis and infection at the recipient site. Higher BMIs are significantly associated with recipient- and donor-site complications.

Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction in Patients With Previous Bariatric Surgery: Is It Safe and Feasible?

Obesity is widely recognized as a major health concern and a leading cause of preventable death. The correlation between obesity and breast cancer has been thoroughly described by several authors. Bariatric surgery is often associated with redundant abdominal tissue, often leading patients to consider body-contouring procedures. Autologous tissue breast reconstruction using the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap has advantages because it is tissue that is normally discarded during postbariatric body contouring. We conducted a retrospective chart review of 18 DIEP flaps performed by the senior author in 9 patients for breast reconstruction between February 2008 and May 2013. All patients underwent mastectomies. All patients underwent bariatric surgery preceding breast reconstruction. Breast reconstruction was performed immediately in 13 cases and delayed in 5 cases. Mean age of the study population was 44.6 years (range, 41-57 years). The mean maximum body mass index of the patients was 44 (range, 37.6-52.1), and the mean current body mass index at the time of the reconstruction was 30.7 (range, 24.3-38.1). No intraoperative complications were reported. No fascia or muscle was taken during flap dissection. Mean operative time was 632 minutes (range, from 480 to 750 minutes). Average hospital stay was 4 days. No partial or total flap loss was reported. There were no postoperative hernias or bulges at the abdominal donor site. This series represents the largest group of patients undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction after bariatric surgery. In the hands of experienced microsurgeons, breast reconstruction with the DIEP flap in postbariatric patients represents a low-risk option with high satisfaction.

Displaying inguinal lymph nodes before transplantation in a deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction using an innovative projection method

Lymphedema of the arm is a common postoperative complication as a result of breast cancer surgery. One of the surgical treatments comprises modification of a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction to facilitate additional lymph node transplantation from the inguinal area. Using computed tomography angiography (CTA), the distribution of these lymph nodes can be assessed. A virtual planning based on this CTA created for the DIEP flap is presented, with the inguinal lymph nodes included, followed by preoperatively projecting this information on the patient's abdomen. A total of 10 patients underwent the standard imaging protocol: A preoperative CTA to assess the vascular anatomy of the lower abdomen. A three-dimensional (3D) model of the blood vessels was produced, and the inguinal lymph nodes in this reconstruction were included. Preoperative projection of the 3D model onto the patients' abdomen and inguinal area was performed, followed by tracing of this image. Intraoperatively found lymph nodes were identified by touch and compared with the markings on the skin. In all 10 patients, all lymph nodes located preoperatively were found intraoperatively within a 1-cm radius of the marking on the skin; and these were more easily located by two operating surgeons. Virtual planning of lymph node transplantations in a deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction seems feasible and can be performed quickly. This additional visual support aids the surgeon in locating the lymph nodes in the inguinal area.