Objective: Although many studies on islet autotransplantation for the treatment of chronic pancreatitis have so far been reported, there have only been a few reports regarding islet autotransplantation for the treatment of acute pancreatitis with severe inflammation. In patients demonstrating a severe inflammatory status, islet autotransplantation usually fails due to both an insufficient islet yield and an impaired islet quality. Therefore, it is important to both identify such cases and improve the treatment protocol in order to increase the success of this therapeutic approach. In the present study, we experienced three cases of islet autotransplantation who all had a severe inflammatory status due to a rupture of a pancreatic arteriovenous The Lessons Learned from Three Cases of Islet Autotransplantation with a Severe Inflammatory Status Due to a Rupture of a Pancreatic Arteriovenous Malformation malformation, and we established a novel graft protection protocol to more effectively treat such patients. Methods: Total pancreatectomy and islet autotransplantation were performed in 3 males diagnosed with a pancreatic arteriovenous malformation. An emergency operation was performed on 2 of these cases due to a rupture and bleeding from the mass. The pancreas weight was 54, 186, and 86 g, respectively. The pancreatic islets were isolated using a modified Ricordi method. The inhalation of isoflurane during islet infusion and continuous intensive insulin treatment combined with shortterm fasting/total parenteral nutrition during the avascular period of the grafts (10 days) were carried out in order to allow the islet grafts to rest. Results: The islet yield was 355,270, 244,758, and 310,238 islet equivalents, respectively, but only 229,538 islet equivalents were infused due to catheter trouble in the third case. The total tissue volume was 5.7, 16.0, and 1.0 ml, respectively. After certifying that no bacterial contamination existed, the islets were then transplanted via the portal vein. In the second case, a sudden increase in the portal vein pressure was seen during islet infusion, and then a portal embolism was observed over a wide range of the liver. As a result, a surgical embolectomy and embolytic therapy were performed. In the other 2 cases, the blood glucose of the recipients was well maintained with no sign of hypoglycemia, and a substantial level of fasting C-peptide was observed under a low dose of daily insulin supplementation. The SUIT index of the first case (15-27) was considerably higher than that of the third case (6-10), thus suggesting that the transplanted islet amount and/or the transplanted tissue amount may play an important role in the treatment outcome. Of particular note, no recurrence of the arteriovenous malformation in all the cases has so far been seen at the transplanted site. Conclusions: These data suggest that the above described refined islet isolation procedures combined with a novel graft protecting protocol could play an important role in achieving successful islet autotransplantation in patients with a severe inflammatory status. Furthermore, several modifications, including changes in the catheterization procedures, reducing the graft amount, and switching to either cultured-islet transplantation or intramascular islet transplantation make need to be performed when complications such as unexpected copious bleeding or a suture of the portal vein occurs.