Arteriovenous Fistula Creation Research Articles

The role of glomerular filtration rate in AVF success: Should we intervene earlier?

End-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients require life-sustaining kidney replacement therapies, with the natural arteriovenous fistula (AVF) being the preferred vascular access due to its low infection risk, high patency, and fewer complications. Factors like vessel diameter, gender, diabetes, age, and surgical technique influence AVF maturation. Our study focused on short-term AVF creation success, specifically examining estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) levels using the CKD-EPI formula. Patients were categorized according to their eGFR levels to observe the effects of fistula timing and the severity of kidney disease. No significant demographic or outcome differences between eGFR groups have been observed except for gender. AVF maturation was notably associated with distal vein diameter (>2mm), while other factors did not significantly impact maturation rates. As a secondary outcome, it was concluded that the recording of patients' blood pressure values at preoperative and perioperative levels led to the conclusion that blood pressure levels may have an impact on fistula maturation. To ensure vascular access effectiveness, optimizing blood pressure, determining vein diameter, strategic AVF timing, and reducing catheter usage are crucial. Our study aimed to identify eGFR levels conducive to optimal AVF outcomes. Although significant results could not be obtained in this regard, it is considered worthwhile to re-examine the effect of blood pressure in secondary outcomes. Additionally, prospective studies may be appropriate for reevaluating the effect of GFR.

A systematic review of prediction models on arteriovenous fistula: Risk scores and machine learning approaches.

Failure-to-mature and early stenosis remains the Achille's heel of hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation. The maturation and patency of an AVF can be influenced by a variety of demographic, comorbidity, and anatomical factors. This study aims to review the prediction models of AVF maturation and patency with various risk scores and machine learning models. Literature search was performed on PubMed, Scopus, and Embase to identify eligible articles. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment (PROBAST) Tool. The performance (discrimination and calibration) of the included studies were extracted. Fourteen studies (seven studies used risk score approaches; seven studies used machine learning approaches) were included in the review. Among them, 12 studies were rated as high or unclear "risk of bias." Six studies were rated as high concern or unclear for "applicability." C-statistics (Model discrimination metric) was reported in five studies using risk score approach (0.70-0.886) and three utilized machine learning methods (0.80-0.85). Model calibration was reported in three studies. Failure-to-mature risk score developed by one of the studies has been externally validated in three different patient populations, however the model discrimination degraded significantly (C-statistics: 0.519-0.53). The performance of existing predictive models for AVF maturation/patency is underreported. They showed satisfactory performance in their own study population. However, there was high risk of bias in methodology used to build some of the models. The reviewed models also lack external validation or had reduced performance in external cohort.

Mitochondrial targeted catalase improves muscle strength following arteriovenous fistula creation in mice with chronic kidney disease

Hand dysfunction is a common observation after arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation for hemodialysis access and has a variable clinical phenotype; however, the underlying mechanism responsible is unclear. Grip strength changes are a common metric used to assess AVF-associated hand disability but has previously been found to poorly correlate with the hemodynamic perturbations post-AVF placement implicating other tissue-level factors as drivers of hand outcomes. In this study, we sought to test if expression of a mitochondrial targeted catalase (mCAT) in skeletal muscle could reduce AVF-related limb dysfunction in mice with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Male and female C57BL/6J mice were fed an adenine-supplemented diet to induce CKD prior to placement of an AVF in the iliac vascular bundle. Adeno-associated virus was used to drive expression of either a green fluorescent protein (control) or mCAT using the muscle-specific human skeletal actin (HSA) gene promoter prior to AVF creation. As expected, the muscle-specific AAV-HSA-mCAT treatment did not impact blood urea nitrogen levels (P = 0.72), body weight (P = 0.84), or central hemodynamics including infrarenal aorta and inferior vena cava diameters (P > 0.18) or velocities (P > 0.38). Hindlimb perfusion recovery and muscle capillary densities were also unaffected by AAV-HSA-mCAT treatment. In contrast to muscle mass and myofiber size which were not different between groups, both absolute and specific muscle contractile forces measured via a nerve-mediated in-situ preparation were significantly greater in AAV-HSA-mCAT treated mice (P = 0.0012 and P = 0.0002). Morphological analysis of the post-synaptic neuromuscular junction uncovered greater acetylcholine receptor cluster areas (P = 0.0094) and lower fragmentation (P = 0.0010) in AAV-HSA-mCAT treated mice. Muscle mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation was not different between groups, but AAV-HSA-mCAT treated mice had lower succinate-fueled mitochondrial hydrogen peroxide emission compared to AAV-HSA-GFP mice (P < 0.001). In summary, muscle-specific scavenging of mitochondrial hydrogen peroxide significantly improves neuromotor function in mice with CKD following AVF creation.

Comparison of Outcomes of Drug-Coated Balloons vs Plain Balloons in Secondary Interventions on Percutaneous Arteriovenous Fistulae

To compare patency and reintervention outcomes following either POBA or DCBA for venous stenoses after percutaneous AV fistula creation. One-hundred and ninety-five pAVFs were successfully created during the study period; 141 using Ellipsys® and 54 using WavelinQTM. Post pAVF creation, 95 patients (48.7%) required secondary PTA with either POBA (n=55, 58%) or DCBA (n=40, 42.1%). The most common site for PTA was the juxta-anastomotic segment (75.5%; 74/98). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to compare target lesion primary patency, access circuit primary patency, secondary patency, and reintervention rates in the POBA and DCBA cohorts. In the POBA cohort 34/55 (62%) patients and in the DCBA cohort 14/40 (35%) of patients required reinterventions for pAVF re-stenosis. Mean follow up days amongst patients treated with POBA was 1030.4 (standard deviation: 342.9) and amongst those treated with DCBA was 744.4 (standard deviation: 403.5). The use of POBA compared to DCBA was not associated with target lesion and access circuit primary patency loss in multivariate analysis (HR=1.81, P=0.080, 95%CI=0.93-3.51 and HR=1.77, P=0.210, 95%CI=0.73-4.28 respectively). However, time from fistula creation to the first PTA (days) was significantly associated with both outcomes (HR=0.997, P=0.009, 95%CI=0.994-0.999 and HR=0.997, P=0.021, 95%CI=0.992-0.999 respectively). There were no major adverse events. In this retrospective single-center analysis of pAVFs, significantly more patients who underwent PTA with POBA post pAVF-creation required reinterventions as compared to PTA using DCBA, although the follow-up time of POBA was longer. In multivariate analysis no significant differences were noted in the hazard of patency loss between POBA and DCBA.

Incidental AVF creation during unrelated hospitalization is associated with worse outcomes compared with outpatient AVF creation.

Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation during an inpatient hospitalization is often performed for patient convenience and to ensure compliance. We sought to evaluate whether this approach has comparable outcomes to outpatient AVF creation. We identified patients undergoing index AVF creation from the United States Renal Data System dataset (2012-2017). Patients were grouped into outpatient and inpatient. Outpatient included patients that were operated in either an outpatient setting, ambulatory surgical center or were admitted inpatient on the day of AVF creation. Inpatient included only patients with claims for an inpatient visit before access creation. Multiple safety outcomes were compared between groups using unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression methods generating odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). One-year maturation rates were compared using competing-risks regression methods generating sub-hazard ratios (sHR) and 95% CI. Outcomes were also compared after 1:1 propensity score matching. We identified 68,872 patients undergoing AVF creation, 4855 (7.1%) of which were created during inpatient hospitalization. Patients in the inpatient group were older (65.8 ± 13.8 vs 65.2 ± 13.8, p = 0.002), more likely to be of Black race (28.1% vs 26.8%, p = 0.02), and have cardiovascular comorbidities (all p < 0.05). Patients in the inpatient groups were more likely to be dialyzed at for-profit (88.1% vs 85.9%, p < 0.01) and freestanding (94.8% vs 92.9%, p < 0.01) dialysis centers. On both unadjusted and adjusted analysis, inpatient group was more likely to experience 30-day adverse events (e.g. pneumonia, COPD exacerbation, stroke, myocardial infarction), any complication, and all-cause mortality. On competing risks analysis, successful two-needle cannulation at 1 year was significantly less likely in the inpatient group (68.1% vs 76.8%, p < 0.01; sHR = 0.68 [95% CI, 0.65-0.71], p < 0.01). These trends were robust on 1:1 propensity matching. Incidental AVF creation in hospitalized patients is associated with worse outcomes, ranging from mortality to postoperative complications to fistula maturation, compared with outpatient AVF creation.

PICC insertion and veins of the arm size variation during dialysis treatment: A prospective observational study.

Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters play an increasingly important role in Central Venous Access Devices. However, the use of these devices should be carefully considered in specific situations such as central catheterisation in patients with chronic kidney disease. When evaluating the feasibility of placement for a patient undergoing dialysis, the relationship between changes in circulating volume before and after dialysis treatment, and potential variations in the size of deep veins in the upper limbs, should be considered. Upper limb veins, specifically the basilic or brachial veins, were identified and measured before and after dialysis treatment. Patient data and weight loss data during dialysis treatment were also collected. Linear regression analysis was performed to assess the correlation between the variables. The average variation in vein size for the entire sample was +0.17 ± 0.43 mm. The mean volume removed was 2.2 ± 0.8 l. In subgroup 1 (fluid volume loss <2000 ml), the population experienced a decrease in the measured vein size after dialysis. In subgroup 2 (fluid volume loss ⩾2000 ml), the population experienced an increase in the measured vein size after dialysis. Upper arm vascular access placement in dialysed patients with fluid removal of less than 2000 ml should be performed after the dialysis session. Conversely, in dialysed patients with fluid removal of more than 2000 ml, where a significant increase in vein size was observed, vascular access placement should be performed before the dialysis session when the veins are smaller. Additionally, it should be noted that in patients with chronic kidney disease, the venous system of the upper limbs should be preserved as much as possible to prevent thrombosis and stenosis in potential arteriovenous fistula creation.

Hemodialysis Patients with High-Flow Arteriovenous Fistulas: An Evaluation of the Impact on Cardiac Function.

: Patients undergoing hemodialysis often experience changes in cardiac function when they have a high-flow arteriovenous fistula (AVF). This study aimed to assess the effect of high-flow AVFs on cardiac function in patients undergoing hemodialysis. : A longitudinal study was conducted on hemodialysis patients with high-flow AVFs. Echocardiographic parameters, such as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left atrial diameter (LAD), left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD), right ventricular end-diastolic dimension (RVEDD), inferior vena cava diameter (IVCD), systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure, were measured and compared before and after AVF creation. : One hundred hemodialysis patients with high-flow AVFs (mean age: 55.95±13.39 years, mean body mass index: 24.71±3.43 kg/m²) were studied. LVEF significantly decreased (51.10%±5.39% to 47.50%±5.79%), while LAD, LVEDD, and IVCD significantly increased after AVF creation (P<0.05). Systolic (132.49±16.42 mmHg to 146.60±17.43 mmHg) and diastolic (79.98±8.40 mmHg to 83.33±9.68 mmHg) blood pressure substantially rose post-fistularization (P<0.001). Notably, LVEF reduction was more significant in brachio-cephalic AVFs (46.29%±4.24%) compared to distal radio-cephalic or snuffbox AVFs (49.17%±7.15%) (P=0.014). : High-flow AVFs can significantly affect echocardiographic parameters in hemodialysis patients, thereby increasing the risk of cardiac failure. Close cardiac monitoring may be necessary for early intervention. Distal AVFs may be preferable in patients with decreased cardiac function.

Role of Doppler Evaluation in Assessing the Maturation of the Arteriovenous Fistula for Hemodialysis: An Observational Study.

Introduction Arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are the preferred type of vascular access for hemodialysis due to their lower risk of complications. This study aimed to determine the role of Doppler evaluation in assessing AVF. Materials and methods We conducted an 18-month prospective observational study of 33 hemodialysis patients who underwent a procedure for the creation of AVF at the Department of Radio-Diagnosis at Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research.Patients were evaluated using color Doppler ultrasound. Participants underwent a careful history and clinical examination to diagnose the disease. All relevant parameters were documented in a structured study proforma. AVF maturation was assessed postoperatively at four weeks using Doppler ultrasound color flow evaluation by looking for vascular components (flow volume, vein, and arterial diameter). Data were analyzed using CoGuide V 1.0.3 Statistical Software (CoGuide, Bangalore, India). Results A total of 33 patients, with a mean age of 54.6 ± 7.8 years, were evaluated. Of the 33 participants, 24 (72.7%) were male, and nine (27.3%) were female. The majority (47%, n=16) of participants had diabetes mellitus, eight (24%) had hypertension, and 10 (29%) had both diabetes mellitus and hypertension. A brachiocephalic fistula was created in 45.5% of participants, and 33.33% had radiocephalic anastomoses. Five participants were diagnosed with AVF complications: two had a pseudoaneurysm, and three had a cephalic vein thrombus. Clinical and demographic characteristics (age, vascular components, and complications) were not significantly related to AVF maturation. Conclusions Doppler ultrasound plays an important role in selecting vessels for AVF preoperatively and assessing AVF maturation postoperatively, thus reducing the primary fistula failure rate. The findings suggest that Doppler evaluation can be a reliable tool for assessing AVF maturation and predicting surgical success, which could help healthcare providers make informed decisions about the best course of treatment for their patients. Continued research is warranted in this area to further understand the role of Doppler ultrasound in evaluating AVF surgery.

Early experience with endovascular arteriovenous fistula creation

Background: Patients opting for haemodialysis as a form of renal replacement therapy require prompt and reliable vascular access. The gold standard for delivering high-quality and safe haemodialysis is through the creation of an arteriovenous fistula (AVF), typically formed at the wrist or elbow. This intervention promotes increased blood flow through superficial veins, fortifying them for repeated needle insertion during haemodialysis treatment. The emergence of percutaneous endovascular arteriovenous fistula (pAVF) introduces a non-surgical alternative for AVF creation. This method eliminates the need for incisions, reducing the likelihood of surgical scarring and changes in vein appearance. Advantages of pAVF encompass the potential for accelerated convalescence, enhanced comfort for the patient, and a diminished adverse effect on body image perception. These non-surgical options may motivate patients to undergo the procedure promptly, enhancing the timeliness of vascular access for haemodialysis and positively impacting overall health outcomes. These relatively new interventions are evolving, enabling the refinement of more efficient and safer techniques. Dialysis nurses play a crucial role in overall success, necessitating further training and development of their skills and knowledge for needling these new fistulas. With an increasing number of successful cases and more readily available information, these non-surgical techniques are gaining popularity among patients, particularly those conscious about their body image. Aim: The goal is to outline an early experience with a comprehensive approach to planning a percutaneous endovascular arteriovenous fistula service at King's College Hospital. Method: This article describes the referral process, screening, clinical assessments, procedural elements and cannulation. Insights are drawn from a single-centre experience in the UK with the WavelinQ System (BD). Emphasis will be placed on key staffing needs, particularly related to patient selection and dialysis nurse training. Conclusion: By addressing these essential considerations, a pAVF service can be successfully implemented.

Basilic vein tunnel transposition versus elevation transposition for brachiobasilic arteriovenous fistula creation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

This study aimed to compare basilic vein tunnel transposition (BVTT) to basilic vein elevation transposition (BVET) technique for superficialization of a basilic arteriovenous fistula. This is a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing outcomes between BVTT and BVET for brachiobasilic arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation. Primary endpoints were primary patency at several time intervals during follow-up and postoperative local complications, whereas secondary endpoints included primary assisted patency and secondary patency. A random effects model meta-analysis was conducted, and the I2 statistic was used to assess heterogeneity. Nine eligible studies were identified, including 543 patients (247 in the BVTT group and 296 in the BVET group). BVTT group was associated with inferior primary patency rate at 6 months compared to BVET group (three studies; OR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.22–0.83; I2 = 0%; p = 0.012). However, primary patency rates were similar between the two study groups at 12 months (six studies; OR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.33–1.22; I2 = 40.7%; p = 0.176), and at 24 months (six studies; OR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.32–2.29; I2 = 74.9%; p = 0.764). No significant differences in terms of primary assisted patency, secondary patency, and postoperative complications were detected between the groups. More specifically, wound infection (BVTT: n = 9/150; BVET: n = 6/186; OR: 1.39; 95% CI: 0.48–4.06; I2 = 0%; p = 0.542) and healing of the scar, particularly regarding arm edema (BVTT: n = 18/100; BVET: n = 27/165; OR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.57–2.18; I2 = 0%; p = 0.755) and hematoma formation (BVTT: n = 14/173; BVET: n = 42/209; OR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.13–1.19; I2 = 49%; p = 0.101), did not differ significantly between the two study groups. BVET achieved superior primary patency at 6 months compared to BVTT, but this benefit seems to be lost during longer follow-up intervals. Therefore, both surgical techniques provide similar long-term outcomes.

Association of race and ethnicity with initial surgical hemodialysis access type in a safety net system

ObjectivesPrior studies have found lower arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation rates in Black and Hispanic patients. Whether this is due to health care disparities or other differences is unclear. Our objective was to evaluate the racial/ethnic differences in initial surgical access type within a high-volume, safety net system with predominantly Black and Hispanic populations. MethodsA retrospective review of initial hemodialysis (HD) access in consecutive cases between 2014 and 2019 was conducted from all five safety net hospitals in a health care system that primarily treats underserved patients. Patient data collected included race, ethnicity, sex, comorbidities, and initial arteriovenous (AV) access type (AV fistula [AVF] vs AV graft [AVG]). The rates of cephalic vein-based AVF (CAVF; radiocephalic, brachiocephalic) were compared with basilic and brachial vein AVF (BAVF), because the latter are performed as two stages. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models were adjusted for demographic and clinical variables to evaluate the relationship between race/ethnicity, surgical access type, and comorbid conditions. ResultsWe included 1334 patients (74% Hispanic, 9% Black, 7% Asian, 2% White, 8% other) who underwent first-time surgical HD access creation. The majority were male (818 [63%]). Medical comorbidities were equal among groups, except for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and stroke, which were higher in Black patients (P < .005 and P = .005, respectively). Overall, 1303 patients (98%) underwent AVF creation and 31 AVG creation (2%), with no difference between race/ethnicity in AVF vs AVG creation. Of the AVF cohort, 991 (76%) had a CAVF and 312 (24%) had a BAVF. Males were more likely than females to get a CAVF (65% vs 35%; P = .002). ConclusionsWithin our safety net health system, where most patients are under-represented minorities, nearly all patients undergoing HD access had an AVF as their initial surgery with no difference in race/ethnicity. AVF type received differed by race, with Black patients twice as likely to undergo BAVF, which required two stages. Further studies are needed to identify the reasons for these differences.

Temporal trends in hemodialysis access creation during the fistula first era

ObjectiveAlthough forearm arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are the preferred initial vascular access for hemodialysis based on national guidelines, there are no population-level studies evaluating trends in creation of forearm vs upper arm AVFs and arteriovenous grafts (AVGs). The purpose of this study was to report temporal trends in first-time permanent hemodialysis access type, and to assess the effect of national initiatives on rates of AVF placement. MethodsRetrospective cross-sectional study (2012-2022) utilizing the Vascular Quality Initiative database. All patients older than 18 years with creation of first-time upper extremity surgical hemodialysis access were included. Anatomic location of the AVF or AVG (forearm vs upper arm) was defined based on inflow artery, outflow vein, and presumed cannulation zone. Primary analysis examined temporal trends in rates of forearm vs upper arm AVFs and AVGs using time series analyses (modified Mann-Kendall test). Subgroup analyses examined rates of access configuration stratified by age, sex, race, dialysis, and socioeconomic status. Interrupted time series analysis was performed to assess the effect of the 2015 Fistula First Catheter Last initiative on rates of AVFs. ResultsOf the 52,170 accesses, 57.9% were upper arm AVFs, 25.2% were forearm AVFs, 15.4% were upper arm AVGs, and 1.5% were forearm AVGs. From 2012 to 2022, there was no significant change in overall rates of forearm or upper arm AVFs. There was a numerical increase in upper arm AVGs (13.9 to 18.2 per 100; P = .09), whereas forearm AVGs significantly declined (1.8 to 0.7 per 100; P = .02). In subgroup analyses, we observed a decrease in forearm AVFs among men (33.1 to 28.7 per 100; P = .04) and disadvantaged (Area Deprivation Index percentile ≥50) patients (29.0 to 20.7 per 100; P = .04), whereas female (17.2 to 23.1 per 100; P = .03), Black (15.6 to 24.5 per 100; P < .01), elderly (age ≥80 years) (18.7 to 32.5 per 100; P < .01), and disadvantaged (13.6 to 20.5 per 100; P < .01) patients had a significant increase in upper arm AVGs. The Fistula First Catheter Last initiative had no effect on the rate of AVF placement (83.2 to 83.7 per 100; P=.37). ConclusionsDespite national initiatives to promote autogenous vascular access, the rates of first-time AVFs have remained relatively constant, with forearm AVFs only representing one-quarter of all permanent surgical accesses. Furthermore, elderly, Black, female, and disadvantaged patients saw an increase in upper arm AVGs. Further efforts to elucidate factors associated with forearm AVF placement, as well as potential physician, center, and regional variation is warranted.

Two-Year Cumulative and Functional Patency after Creation of Endovascular Arteriovenous Hemodialysis Fistulae

PurposeTo assess 2-year cumulative and functional patency of endovascular arteriovenous fistulae (endoAVF) created with the WavelinQ device. Materials and MethodsPatients who had fistulae created at a single center from December 2019 to December 2020 were included in this retrospective study. Forty-three patients underwent endoAVF creation (22 females, 21 males). Data collected included patient demographics, location of fistula creation, interventions performed, and brachial artery flow before and after creation. Two-year cumulative and functional patency rates were assessed with Kaplan–Meier method, and variables that affected patency and maturation were examined using Cox proportional hazards model. ResultsTechnical success was 95% (41/43), and in 4 patients, the fistula did not mature for dialysis use (9.7%). For the remaining 37 patients with endoAVF maturation, 25 had ulnar–ulnar fistulae, 10 had radial–radial fistulae, and 2 had interosseous artery–vein fistulae. Mean maturity time was 73 days, and brachial artery flow of >886 mL/min was predictive of maturation. Mean tunneled dialysis catheter removal time was 133 days. Number of interventions per patient-year was 0.38, where 8 were maturation procedures (5 vein elevations/transpositions and 3 coil embolizations) and 21 were maintenance angioplasties. Two-year cumulative/secondary and functional patency rates were 89.4% and 92.1%, respectively, with a mean follow-up of 665.7 days. Examined variables did not impact cumulative or functional patency. One adverse event was migration of coil to the heart, which was successfully retrieved at time of procedure. ConclusionsTwo-year patency of 89.4% and functional patency of 92.1% were observed after endoAVF creation with WavelinQ device.

Evaluating patient perspectives of endovascular created arteriovenous fistulas for dialysis access (EndoAVF)

BackgroundPatient reported experience measures are contemporary quality indicators that focus on evaluation of healthcare delivery processes. While surgical arteriovenous fistulas (otherAVF) are preferred for haemodialysis vascular access, fears about surgery and complications often result in refusal/delays. A new technique of endovascular arteriovenous fistula creation (EndoAVF) has been developed and as part of it’s ongoing introduction into our unit, the patient perspective was felt critical to its evaluation. The Vascular Access Questionnaire (VAQ) provides a mechanism for identifying and scoring perceptions in this setting.MethodPatients who had previously undergone EndoAVF formation were approached to undertake the VAQ as part of a service evaluation of their experience. In addition to the components of the VAQ, data questions relating to the patient’s perception of their access were gathered. Results were compared with a matched historical cohort of surgically created fistulas (otherAVF) patients.ResultsPatient satisfaction and self-reported ease of use with EndoAVF were high. Overall VAQ scores were similar between the EndoAVF and the surgically created cohort. Functionally, there was no significant difference in perception of their fistula by patients, irrespective of them being created surgically or radiologically.ConclusionAlthough numbers in this report are small limiting exploration of preserved inherent heterogeneity, we provide a useful initial patient reported experience and perspectives on comparative functional use of radiologically and surgically created AVFs. As real world experience gathers, future larger cohorts with adequate sampling may allow exploration of patient reported experiences and outcome measures.

Vascular access for hemodialysis in Italy: What a national survey reveals.

Since in Italy there are no official data on vascular access (VA) for hemodialysis the Vascular Access Project Group (VAPG) of the Italian Society of Nephrology (SIN) designed a national survey. A 35-question survey was designed and sent it to the Italian facilities through the SIN website. The basic questions were the prevalence, the location, and the surveillance of VA, the bedside use of ultrasound, the use of fluoroscopy for central venous catheter (CVC) placement, and of buttonhole technique, the role of nephrologist in the access creation. The questionnaire was completed in June 2022 by 161 facilities. The survey registered 15,499 patients, approximately one-third of the Italian dialysis population. The prevalence of arteriovenous fistula (AVF), arteriovenous Graft (AVG), and CVC were 61.8%, 3.7%, and 34.5% respectively. The AVF location was 50% in distal forearm, 20% in meanproximal forearm, 30% in upper arm. For AVF creation, nephrologists were involved in 72% of facilities while for CVC placement in 62%. As regards VA monitoring, 21% of the facilities did not have a surveillance protocol; 60% did not register AVF thrombosis and 53% did not register CVC infections. Most of facilities use the fluoroscope during CVC placement, 37% when needed, and 22% never. Ultrasound-guided puncture of complex AVFs was used by 80% of facilities. Buttonhole puncture was used in 5% of patients. Some considerations emerge from the survey data: (1) The increasing CVC prevalence compared to DOPPS 5 study. (2) The low rate of AVG prevalence. (3) The nephrologist is the operator in many VA procedures. (4) The fluoroscopy for CVC placement and the US-guide puncture of the complex AVF are widely used in most facilities. (5) The practice of the buttonhole is not widespread. (6) When the operator is the nephrologist more distal fistulas are performed.

Distal AVF creation with marginal calcified radial artery: Multicentric experience of intraoperative intravascular lithotripsy.

The first-choice vascular access to starting dialysis in patients with End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) is autogenous distal arteriovenous-fistula (AVF) to spare vascular district avoiding proximal fistula complications. One of most significant exclusion criteria to create distal AVF is still now the presence of huge calcification of the feeding artery due to large numbers of early failure (EF) and failure in maturation (FTM). In recent years the possibility to use new devices able to deliver intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) to treat high calcified stenosis could be a possibility to recruit these marginal arteries to create distal AVF. ESRD patients with totally calcified radial artery wall were enrolled to participate to this prospective, single arm, multicentric study. The selected patients were treated with intraoperative IVL at surgical time, during anastomosis creation to soften calcified radial artery. Patients were followed 1 month after surgery with eco-doppler, for flow and vessels maturation assessment. At 3 month was investigated how many patients have started dialysis treatment with two needle cannulation and good efficiency. Nineteen distal forearm radio-cephalic fistula were built in 19 patients. One-month doppler assessment showed mean AVF flow of 743 ml/min and efferent vein caliper of 6.46 mm. At 3 months 14 patient have started stable 2 needles dialysis (other three patients were not yet dialysis dependent CKD). Were observed one immediate failure, one failure in maturation, and two late failures at 4 and 16 months respectively. Sixteen months primary and secondary patency was 78.9% and 89.5% respectively. These results showed how intraoperative IVL could help to recruit huge calcified marginal artery to create autogenous distal forearm AVF, avoiding proximal AVF, risking distal ischemia syndrome, and sparing vascular district to eventually rebuilt more proximal AVF in future.

Predicting factors for early failure of vascular access in hemodialysis patients.

This study aimed to investigate the incidence of early failure of vascular access for hemodialysis, and determine which factors measured in duplex ultrasound study could predict early failure. We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent arteriovenous fistula (AVF) or arteriovenous graft (AVG) creation for hemodialysis between September 2019 and January 2023. Early failure was defined as any event that required surgical or endovascular intervention within 6 months following AVF or AVG creation. A total of 189 patients were included. Early failure occurred in 36 patients (19.0%), which included 22 AVFs and 14 AVGs. In the patients who underwent AVF, the preoperative venous diameter, postoperative venous and arterial diameters, and flow volume of AVF all were significantly smaller in the early failure group compared to the patent group. In AVG, the preoperative venous diameter was the only parameter that differed between the 2 groups. A sonographic score was defined based on these factors. In a multivariable analysis, male sex, a previous history of AVF or AVG creation, and sonographic score were found to be significantly associated with early failure. The postoperative venous diameter in AVF and the preoperative venous diameter in AVG were highly predictive of early failure (areas under the curves 0.92 and 0.82, respectively). Venous diameter measured 6 weeks following AVF operation and preoperative venous diameter in AVG were highly predictive of early failure among the duplex ultrasound parameters. Surveillance strategies in the early phase following vascular access creation can be based on these factors.

What are the observed procedural costs of vascular access surgery? Protocol for a systematic review

IntroductionA central component in the introduction of a novel surgical procedure or technique is an evaluation of its cost efficiency when compared with a benchmark standard of care. Accurate assessment...

Assessment of anatomic variations of the brachial artery bifurcation using vascular Doppler ultrasound: a cross-sectional study.

Anatomical variations in arteries of the upper limb, such as presence of an accessory brachial artery, are common and widely described in the literature, mainly in cadaveric studies, but it is now possible to diagnose them using vascular Doppler ultrasound. To identify the incidence of accessory brachial artery using vascular Doppler ultrasound and compare the findings with cadaveric studies. This was a prospective study that examined 500 upper limbs of 250 volunteers assessed with vascular Doppler ultrasound using the Sonosite Titan portable ultrasound machine. 15.6% of the participants in our study had the accessory brachial artery anatomical variation. Our percentage is in line with the average rates found in cadaveric studies, which ranged from 0.2% to 22%. Being aware of this variation is fundamental in procedures such as peripheral venipuncture, arteriovenous fistula creation, catheterization, forearm flaps, emergency surgeries on the limb and even correction of fractures by cast. The accessory brachial artery is a frequent variant in the upper limb. The percentage of individuals with an accessory brachial artery in our study was 15.6%, which agrees with data from the literature on cadaveric studies.

Lipectomy as an alternative for superficialization of autologous AVF in obese patients: experience of a referral center in Amazon.

The preferred vascular access for hemodialysis is a native arteriovenous fistula (AVF) because it offers the best results in the short and long terms, lower morbidity and mortality, and has additional advantages in relation to central venous catheters or arteriovenous grafts. However, obesity can present an additional challenge because of the barrier of subcutaneous cellular tissue covering the surface of the vein to be punctured. The authors review their experience with excision of subcutaneous tissue (lipectomy) overlying upper arm cephalic vein arteriovenous fistulas in obese patients. Consecutive vascular access patients undergoing lipectomy for cannulation with difficult access because of vein depth were reviewed. Cephalic vein depth was measured by ultrasound in all cases. Twenty-two patients were reviewed (15 men and 7 women), with a mean body mass index of 34.0 kg/m2 (range: 28-40 kg/m2). Mean age was 58.4 years. The mean preoperative vein depth of 7.9 mm (range: 7.0-10.0 mm) was reduced to 4.7 mm (range: 3.0-6.0 mm) (P 0.01). The mean follow-up period for patients was 13.2 months. Four patients were lost to follow-up and four died during the period due to causes unrelated to vascular access. Obesity should not be a limiting factor to creation of a native AVF, since lipectomy is a relatively simple option for superficialization, enabling functioning native and deep arteriovenous fistulas in obese patients.