Abstract

Background: We use vessel dilators to assess the diameter of the target vein during surgery for arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation in hemodialysis patients. This study investigates the efficacy of using vein diameter as measured using dilators (surgical diameter; SD) versus that as measured by preoperative ultrasonography (ultrasonographic diameter; UD) to predict postoperative complications and patency. Methods: Sixty-three patients who underwent radiocephalic AVF creation and had measurements of UD and SD were retrospectively analyzed. Cutoff values for UD and SD regarding complications were used to dichotomize the patients into high and low groups for comparisons. Results: The 2-year primary and secondary patency rates overall were 66.5% and 88.9%, respectively. The optimal UD and SD cutoff values were 2.4 and 3.5 mm, respectively. The 2-year primary patency rate was higher in the high-SD group than the low-SD group (88.2% vs. 58.6%; p = 0.0426). The 2-year secondary patency rate was significantly higher in the high-UD/high-SD group than the low-UD/low-SD group (91.7% vs. 68.4%; p = 0.0067). Conclusions: Intraoperative measurement of vein diameter using dilators during AVF creation might be a useful method of predicting patency, particularly when SD is used in combination with UD.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.