Background/Objectives: Titanium fixation remains the gold standard for stabilizing mandibular fractures; however, associated complications often necessitate a second surgery for hardware removal. Consequently, biodegradable systems were introduced, though questions persist regarding their mechanical reliability and potential for tissue reactions. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy and morbidity of biodegradable versus titanium osteosynthesis systems for the treatment of mandibular fractures. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL. Comparative studies, such as randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies, were included. The primary outcome was the rate of hardware removal; therefore, a random-effects meta-analysis was performed to calculate a pooled Odds Ratio (OR), while the risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 and ROBINS-I tools. Results: Eight studies, including four RCTs, comprising a total of 369 patients, were included, with most studies judged to be at a high or serious risk of bias due to inadequate randomization, lack of blinding, and confounding co-interventions. The meta-analysis of four RCTs on hardware removal revealed no statistically significant difference between the biodegradable and titanium groups (pooled OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.04 to 1.90), with substantial and statistically significant heterogeneity observed (I2 = 66.1%). Qualitative synthesis indicated that biodegradable systems were associated with higher rates of intraoperative screw breakage and longer operative times, while rates of successful bone union were comparable between the two groups. Conclusions: Biodegradable osteosynthesis systems represent a viable alternative to titanium for mandibular fracture fixation, demonstrating similar efficacy in achieving bone union, which is counterbalanced by higher rates of screw breakage and longer operative times. The decision to use a biodegradable system involves a critical trade-off that should be designed for the specific clinical scenario. The high risk of bias and significant heterogeneity limit the certainty of these findings, underscoring the imperative for future high-quality, long-term RCTs.

Background/Objectives: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is an accessible and low-cost diagnostic tool that is seldom used by orthopedic residents. This study aims to assess the efficacy of a POCUS training program within an orthopedic surgery residency curriculum in terms of knowledge retention and clinical usage among the group of residents. Methods: This study included didactic and hands-on teaching sessions. The impact of the teaching sessions was evaluated through surveys (pre-course, immediate post-course, and 6 months post-course). The surveys were divided into three sections: participant’s interest in and usage of POCUS, ultrasound-related knowledge, and perceived limitations related to the usage of ultrasound. All orthopedic residents who attended the teaching sessions and completed all the surveys were included. Results: There were 14 participants. There was a significant increase in interest in POCUS (scale 1 to 5) from 3.36 ± 0.50 in the pre-course survey to 3.93 ± 0.83 in the final post-course survey (p = 0.04). However, there was no significant change in the amount of POCUS usage in clinical settings. Levels of comfort with ultrasound-related procedures significantly increased immediately following the teaching session but did not stay significantly higher after 6 months. When tested on knowledge, the residents’ scores were still significantly greater than they were at the time of the pre-course test at 6 months (p = 0.01). Lack of ultrasound-related knowledge, lack of time, and site culture were the two most prevalent perceived barriers. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that POCUS teaching for orthopedic residents yields long-term benefits in terms of interest and knowledge. However, recurrent teaching sessions and further efforts are required to address perceived obstacles to PoCUS usage and increase clinical implementation.

Background/Objectives: Prepectoral direct-to-implant reconstruction is widely used, but implant rippling often necessitates lipofilling. This study aimed to identify preoperative and perioperative factors associated with delayed lipofilling. Methods: A retrospective cohort of consecutive patients who underwent immediate prepectoral implant reconstruction (April 2023–September 2024) was analyzed. Demographic data, BMI, smoking, comorbidities, oncologic treatments, surgical factors, and tumor location were recorded. Patients were divided according to whether delayed lipofilling was required. Univariate analysis was performed using Mann–Whitney U and Fisher’s exact tests. Results: Fifty-eight patients were included; approximately one-third required lipofilling. Patients who underwent lipofilling were younger and had lower BMI than those who did not. Tumor location was strongly associated with the outcome: upper inner quadrant tumors were consistently linked to delayed lipofilling, whereas upper outer quadrant tumors were more frequently observed in the group not requiring revision. Smoking history and planned radiotherapy showed nonsignificant trends toward higher lipofilling rates. No differences were found for diabetes or corticosteroid therapy. Conclusions: Younger age, low BMI, and tumor location, particularly in the upper inner quadrant, were key factors associated with delayed lipofilling after prepectoral reconstruction. These variables may support preoperative counseling and follow-up planning to better anticipate secondary procedures and optimize aesthetic outcomes.

Background and objectives: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is often associated with significant postoperative pain. Effective pain control is vital for early mobilization and reducing opioid use. While femoral nerve block (FNB) and adductor canal block (ACB) are common, they can cause motor weakness and incomplete analgesia. The genicular nerve block (GNB), typically used for chronic knee pain and arthroplasty, may offer a motor-sparing alternative for ACLR pain management. This review evaluates the evidence on GNB’s effectiveness for pain control, opioid reduction, and recovery after ACLR. Materials and Methods: A literature search (January 2014–May 2025) identified five studies involving adult ACLR patients receiving GNB. Data on demographics, techniques, pain scores, opioid use, and complications were analyzed. Results: Among 115 patients, GNB provided effective analgesia and reduced opioid needs. Randomized trials showed GNB was comparable to ACB and more effective when combined. Ultrasound, especially with Doppler, enhances precision and safety. No major motor deficits or adverse events were noted. Landmark-based approaches also showed utility in low-resource settings. Conclusions: GNB is a promising, motor-sparing option for postoperative pain in ACLR. Further high-quality trials are needed to confirm the benefits and standardize its use. The findings should be interpreted with caution, as the current evidence is of limited quality and lacks generalizability.

Background/Objectives: Over the last decade, the role and timing of lymph node dissection (LND) in stage III melanoma has shifted from completion LND after a positive sentinel node to a mainly therapeutic procedure for clinically evident nodal disease, driven by randomized evidence showing no survival benefit for routine completion dissection. In this evolving landscape, real-world data on postoperative morbidity—by nodal basin—and on whether complications may influence melanoma-specific survival (MSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) remain limited. We evaluated 90-day postoperative complications after cervical, axillary, and inguino–iliac–obturator LND and explored their association with survival outcomes and treatment era. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 185 consecutive stage III melanoma patients undergoing LND at a single tertiary center (January 2004–August 2025). Postoperative morbidity was recorded up to 90 days and graded by Clavien–Dindo; given the very low rate of grade > II events, the primary endpoint was a composite of loco-regional surgical field–related complications (persistent seroma, wound dehiscence, surgical-site infection, limb lymphedema). Risk factors were assessed using logistic regression; Firth’s penalized models were applied when appropriate. MSS and DFS were estimated by Kaplan–Meier and explored with Cox models. Results: Median follow-up was 105 months. Surgical field–related complications occurred in 16.8% (31/185), and postoperative mortality was 1.0% (2/185). In multivariable analyses, inguino–iliac–obturator LND was associated with higher odds of overall complications (OR 4.03) and specifically wound dehiscence (OR 4.79) and infection (OR 7.18) versus axillary LND. MSS (n = 179) was 82% at 1 year, 55% at 5 years, and 49% at 10 years; DFS (n = 171) was 63%, 42%, and 41%, respectively. In era-based comparisons, nodal yield decreased in the post–MSLT-II period without clear separation of MSS/DFS curves; exploratory models did not show a consistent independent signal linking postoperative complications to MSS/DFS. Conclusions: In stage III melanoma, LND was associated with low major morbidity, but clinically meaningful locoregional complications persisted—most notably after inguino–iliac–obturator dissection. These data support careful patient selection and basin-tailored strategies to reduce groin morbidity within modern multidisciplinary management.

Background: Extramedullary spinal tumors represent a significant challenge for spine surgeons. Currently, various techniques exist to perform tumor resection safely while optimizing patient outcomes. Historically, the standard of care has been open surgery; however, in the last two decades, Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery (MISS) techniques have gained importance due to superior postoperative recovery. Literature on Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy (UBE) for tumor resection is currently limited. We propose that UBE has the potential to become a standard approach for these lesions due to its distinct advantages. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 11 patients who underwent UBE resection of lower thoracic and lumbar spinal extramedullary tumors. We analyzed clinical files and intraoperative endoscopic videos to describe our surgical technique step by step. We also evaluated the advantages of this approach in terms of resection rate, operative time, operative blood loss, and hospital stay. A representative case is also presented. Results: Clinical resolution and significant symptomatic improvement were achieved in all cases, as evidenced by functional and pain scales. In terms of tumor resection, we obtained results comparable to other MISS techniques and open surgery, with a low complication rate. Conclusions: UBE represents a safe, effective evolution in MISS for spinal tumors. Future studies with larger cohorts are needed to validate these findings as a standard of care.

Replantation of an amputated finger is a complex microsurgical procedure that is rarely attempted in low-resource settings due to limited infrastructure and expertise. We report a case of complete amputation of a finger in rural Kenya that was successfully replanted during a humanitarian surgical mission. A 28-year-old man sustained a severe crush avulsion agricultural machine injury resulting in the amputation of all ten digits; only one digit was deemed suitable for replantation. The replantation was performed under loupe and microscope magnification by a visiting specialist team in collaboration with local staff. Intraoperatively, bony fixation with Kirschner wires, extensor and flexor digitorum profundus tendon repair, arterial and venous anastomoses, and neurorrhaphy of the digital nerve were achieved. Postoperatively, the finger survived with adequate perfusion. At one-month follow-up, the replanted finger was viable with progressing wound healing and early joint motion; further rehabilitation was arranged to maximize functional recovery. This case, which is, to our knowledge, one of the first documented digital replantations in East Africa, illustrates that successful microsurgical limb salvage is feasible in a non-specialized hospital setting. Our experience underscores that, with proper planning, training, and teamwork, advanced reconstructive procedures like finger replantation can be safely carried out even in resource-constrained hospitals, offering patients in low-income regions outcomes previously achievable only in high-resource centers.

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a transformative procedure for managing severe hip disorders, yet implant longevity remains a critical challenge, particularly for younger, active patients. Wear-related complications are a leading cause of revision surgery, emphasizing the need for optimized design and material performance. This systematic review aims to synthesize evidence on the wear behavior, material properties, and design parameters of hip implants with a focus on finite element analysis (FEA)-based predictive approaches. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across Scopus, PubMed, ScienceDirect, MDPI, and Cochrane databases following PRISMA guidelines. Studies published between 2010 and 2025 were included if they addressed THA biomechanics, wear analysis, or material optimization using FEA, hip simulators, or radiostereometric techniques. Key findings reveal that larger femoral heads, while reducing contact pressure, increase wear due to greater sliding distance. Gravimetric wear rates ranged from 3.15 ± 0.27 mg/Mc to 2.18 ± 0.31 mg/Mc, while linear and volumetric wear reached 0.0375 mm/Mc and 33.6 mm3/Mc, respectively. Stress analysis showed custom stems exhibited markedly lower von Mises stress (194.9 MPa) compared to standard designs (664.3 MPa), and fatigue assessments confirmed a factor of safety > 1 across profiles. Patient-specific factors, such as body weight, significantly influenced wear with a 26% increase in metal wear observed between 100 kg and 140 kg. This systematic review synthesizes current research on total hip arthroplasty, emphasizing biomechanical and material factors critical for implant longevity and patient care. It uniquely integrates FEA-based wear prediction with clinical implications, bridging computational modeling, geometry optimization, and material performance to provide actionable insights for next-generation, patient-specific hip implant design.

Bennett fractures are common intra-articular fractures of the base of the first metacarpal. Not optimal restoration of the articular surface often leads to osteoarthritis, with pain and limited movement. In patients with established and symptomatic TMC osteoarthritis, arthroplasty with MAIA® prosthesis could be a valid option. In July 2024, a right-handed man of 68 years old fell on his hand. Radiographs showed a Bennett fracture in a setting of Eaton–Littler stage 3 osteoarthritis, already painful and disabling according to the patient. For correct pre-operative planning, a 3D model of the affected hand was produced. The patient underwent TMC arthroplasty with a MAIA® prosthesis. Two months after surgery, the results reported no pain (VAS scale) and considerable functionality and mobility of the first ray (AROM, Kapandji score, and PRWHE were investigated). The mean pinch strength of the right hand was 7 kg and of the left hand 7.5 kg using a pinch meter. At one-year follow-up, no complications were reported: the implant did not show signs of loosening or subsidence. TMC arthroplasty in Bennett fractures could represent a safe procedure in patients with established TMC osteoarthritis; however, further studies are requested in order to clarify effectiveness and indications.

Background: After unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA), patients place more weight on the nonsurgical limb than the surgical limb. The objective of this study was to determine the possibility of providing live biofeedback during early recovery of patients undergoing unilateral TKA and to determine the necessary sample size for future trials. Methods: Twenty patients with unilateral TKA were randomized into two groups: a feedback group and a control group. Inclusion criteria included no contralateral knee pain and aid-free walking before surgery. There were 8 patients in the feedback group and 10 in the control group. Compliance with the recommended training was 91%. The feedback group trained with an insole device for 15 min a day for 4 weeks, along with normal physiotherapy. The control group received normal physiotherapy only. Gait parameters were recorded on level ground at two and six weeks. The primary outcome was the percent loading rate. The secondary outcomes included gait speed, cadence, percent peak force, and pain. Results: Patients within the feedback group showed a small, non-significant trend toward a higher precent load rate at 6 weeks compared to the control group in level walking (p = 0.92). Conclusions: Our findings indicate that live biofeedback on a gait parameter, like percent load rate, can be provided by the mentioned system and may support immediate changes in gait parameters. The compliance of 91% with training and no reported adverse events indicates that the system was easy to use. Following TKA, there may be a potential exploratory use of mobile, real-time biofeedback to help address gait abnormalities and accelerate rehabilitation. This clinical trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier: NCT03673293) on 14 September 2018. This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the institutional review board of the University of Utah (IRB_00110935) on 10 September 2018.