Arteriovenous Access Surgery Research Articles

Effect of preoperative heart failure on arteriovenous access patency and prognosis in patients on hemodialysis.

The risk of arteriovenous (AV) access failure is associated with hemodynamic factors, clinical factors, or technical issues. Although several studies have shown the detrimental effects of AV access on heart function, few studies have assessed whether heart function affects AV access patency. We investigated the impact of cardiac function on AV access patency. Additionally, we evaluated the influence of heart failure (HF) on the prognosis of patients on dialysis. Patients who underwent dialysis and had echocardiographic reports between 2011 and 2013 were retrospectively included. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was used to measure cardiac function. Data on demographics, clinical features, and technical factors associated with AV access surgery were collected. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the risk factors for AV access patency loss and the prognosis of patients on dialysis. During the study period, 395 patients initiated on dialysis underwent echocardiography. In multivariate analysis, older age (hazard ratio (HR) 1.02 (1-1.03), p = 0.028), smoking (HR 2.05 (1.19-3.53), p = 0.01), lower LVEF (HR 0.98 (0.97-1), p = 0.015), and graft use (HR 2.29 (1.47-3.58), p = 0.001) were significant risk factors for primary patency loss. Regarding secondary patency loss, lower LVEF (HR 0.98 (0.96-1), p = 0.035) was the sole risk factor. In multivariate analysis, risk factors for cardiac events (acute coronary syndrome and aggravation of HF) in patients on dialysis were age (HR 1.06 (1.04-1.09), p = 0.001), diabetes (HR 2.46 (1.31-4.63), p = 0.005), pre-existing coronary artery disease (HR 2.84 (1.57-5.14), p = 0.001), and HF (HR 1.93 (1.05-3.56), p = 0.036). Decreased cardiac function adversely affects the primary and secondary patency of AV access, but its impact is limited. Additionally, HF is associated with future cardiac events in dialysis patients. However, HF is not independently associated with patient survival.

Clinical impact of the Kidney Failure Risk Equation for vascular access planning.

Risk-based thresholds for arteriovenous (AV) access creation has been proposed to aid vascular access planning. We aimed to assess the clinical impact of implementing the kidney failure risk equation (KFRE) for vascular access referral. 16,102 nephrology-referred chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients from the Swedish Renal Registry 2008-2018 were included. The KFRE was calculated repeatedly, and the timing was identified for when the KFRE risk exceeded several pre-defined thresholds and/or the estimated glomerular filtration rate <15 ml/min/1.73m2 (eGFR15). To assess the utility of the KFRE/eGFR thresholds, cumulative incidence curves of kidney replacement therapy (KRT) or death, and decision-curve analyses were computed at 6, 12 months, and 2 years. The potential impact of using the different thresholds was illustrated by an example from the Swedish access registry. The 12-month specificity for KRT initiation was highest for KFRE>50% 94.5 (95% Confidence interval [CI] 94.3-94.7), followed by KFRE>40% 90.0 (95% CI 89.7-90.3), while sensitivity was highest for KFRE>30% 79.3 (95% CI 78.2-80.3) and eGFR<15 ml/min/1.73m2 81.2 (95% CI 80.2-82.2). The 2-year positive predictive value was 71.5 (95% CI 70.2-72.8), 61.7 (95% CI 60.4-63.0) and 47.2 (95% CI 46.1-48.3) for KFRE>50%, KFRE>40%, and eGFR<15 respectively. Decision curve analyses suggested the largest net benefit for KFRE>40% over two years and KFRE>50% over 12 months when it is important to avoid the harm of possibly unnecessary surgery. In Sweden, 54% of nephrology-referred patients started hemodialysis in a central venous catheter (CVC) of which only 5% had AV access surgery >6 months before initiation. 60% of the CVC patients exceeded KFRE>40% a median of 0.8 years (interquartile range 0.4-1.5) before KRT initiation. The utility of using KFRE>40% and KFRE>50% is higher compared to the more traditionally used eGFR threshold <15 ml/min/1.73m2 for vascular access planning.

Frailty screening for determination of hemodialysis access placement

ObjectiveChoosing the right hemodialysis vascular access for frail patients remains difficult because the patient's preferences and the likelihood of access function and survival must be considered. We hypothesize that patients identified before arteriovenous (AV) access as frail by the PRISMA-7 score may have worse outcomes, indicating that fistula creation may not be the most clinically beneficial option and it would be in the best interest of the patient to receive either AV graft (AVG) placement or dialysis through a percutaneous catheter. Our pilot study aims to determine whether an association exists between patient frailty as defined by PRISMA-7 and newly created AV fistula (AVF) and AVG access outcomes. MethodsThis was a single institutional prospective cohort study of patients undergoing new AVF or AVG intervention from April 2021 to May 2023. Patients were assessed using the PRISMA-7 frailty questionnaire before their AV access surgery. Patients were grouped by frailty score and score groups were examined for trends. Univariable analysis was performed for baseline differences between frail and nonfrail patients. Failure to achieve maturation, postoperative infection, and 180-day mortality difference was also investigated for frail vs nonfrail patients. Univariable analysis was performed for nonmaturation using standard comorbidities, arterial and venous diameters, and frailty. Multivariable binary logistic regression was performed for the outcome of nonmaturation using frailty as one of the variables in conjunction with the univariable risks associated with nonmaturation. ResultsA total of 40 patients undergoing new AV access placement were investigated, among whom 53% were designated as frail (PRISMA-7 score ≥3). When comparing the frail and nonfrail new AV access groups, the access (AVF and AVG combined) failed in 48% (10/21) of the frail patients, but only failed in 5% (1/19) of the nonfrail patients 1 (P = .012). When distinguishing between AV access types, AVF creations followed the overall trend with 60% of AVF access (9/15) sites in frail patients failing to mature when compared with nonfrail patients, who all had fistulas that matured to use (P = .049). Surgical site infection was absent in all frail patients and present in 5% of nonfrail patients (1/19). Both 30-day and 60-day readmission rates were higher in the frail group compared with the nonfrail group. There was 180-day mortality present in 5 of frail patients % (1/21) and absent in nonfrail patients. Multivariable analysis revealed that both frailty (adjusted odd ratio, 10.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.20-82.25); P = .033) and younger age (adjusted odd ratio, 0.953; 95% confidence interval, 0.923-0.983; P = .002) both had a significant association with nonmaturation. Power analysis revealed a power statistic of 0.898 indicating a probability of type 2 error of 10.02% with a P value of .002. Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit for the logistic regression had 75% overall accuracy for the model. ConclusionsPatient frailty is significantly associated with an increased incidence of AV access failure to mature.

Dialysis Access-Associated Steal Syndrome in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Surgery for Hemodialysis Access: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Preventive Operative Techniques.

This systematic review and meta-analysis examine preventive operative techniques in high-risk patients undergoing surgery for hemodialysis access to mitigate the risk of Dialysis Access-Associated Steal Syndrome (DASS). Chronic kidney disease often leads to end-stage renal disease (ESRD), necessitating dialysis. Successful vascular access is crucial for efficient dialysis, but complications, such as DASS, pose significant challenges. DASS redirects arterial blood flow, affecting populations undergoing arteriovenous access surgery. This study aims to assess preventive strategies, including distal revascularization with interval ligation (DRIL) and extension techniques. A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science until 2022 identified 11 relevant studies. The inclusion criteria comprised non-pediatric hemodialysis patients reporting outcomes related to patency and complications. The data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.3.5 (The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen). Meta-analysis indicated a significant association between DASS and arteriovenous fistula (AVF) or arteriovenous graft (AVG) procedures. Radiocephalic AVF (RC-AVF) and distal endovascular AVF procedures were favored. Various interventions addressed venous narrowing, including simple plication and loop interposition. The Modified by Inserted Latex Link for Endovascular Repair (MILLER) technique, DRIL, Extension Technique, and Proximalization of Arterial Inflow (PAI) were assessed for arterial bypass graft and blood supply preservation. This study underscores the importance of individualized strategies in preventing DASS during hemodialysis access surgery. Prophylactic measures, such as the extension technique, show promise, while DRIL remains effective in treatment. Ongoing research is imperative for optimizing outcomes in this complex patient population.

Application of Propofol Target-Controlled Infusion for Optimized Hemodynamic Status in ESRD Patients Receiving Arteriovenous Access Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background and Objectives: End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is associated with increased anesthetic risks such as cardiovascular events resulting in higher perioperative mortality rates. This study investigated the perioperative and postoperative outcomes in ESRD patients receiving propofol target-controlled infusion with brachial plexus block during arteriovenous (AV) access surgery. Materials and Methods: We recruited fifty consecutive patients scheduled to receive AV access surgery. While all patients received general anesthesia combined with ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block, the patients were randomly assigned to one of two general anesthesia maintenance groups, with 23 receiving propofol target-controlled infusion (TCI) and 24 receiving sevoflurane inhalation. We measured perioperative mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate, and cardiac output and recorded postoperative pain status and adverse events in both groups. Results: ESRD patients receiving propofol TCI had significantly less reduction in blood pressure than those receiving sevoflurane inhalation (p < 0.05) during AV access surgery. Perioperative cardiac output and heart rate were similar in both groups. Both groups reported relatively low postoperative pain score and a low incidence of adverse events. Conclusions: Propofol TCI with brachial plexus block can be used as an effective anesthesia regimen for ESRD patients receiving AV access surgery. It can be used with less blood pressure fluctuation than inhalational anesthesia.

Effects of double vs triple injection on block dynamics for ultrasound-guided intertruncal approach to the supraclavicular brachial plexus block in patients undergoing upper limb arteriovenous access surgery: study protocol for a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial

BackgroundUltrasound-guided intertruncal approach (IA) has been proposed to be an alternative and promising approach to the supraclavicular block (SCB), in which double injection (DI) of local anesthetics (LA) is sequentially administered between intertruncal planes. We would like to apply a refined injection technique, named triple injection (TI) technique, based on the 3 separate compartments visualized by ultrasound. The aim of this study is to compare the percentage of patients with complete sensory blockade at 20 min of DI vs TI technique, when they are applied in patients undergoing upper limb arteriovenous access surgery.MethodsThis study is a prospective parallel-group randomized controlled trial. A total of 86 end-stage renal disease patients will be randomly allocated to receive IA-SCB using either DI or TI technique with identical LA (0.5% ropivacaine 24 mL). The primary outcome is the percentage of patients with complete sensory blockade of all 4 terminal nerves (median, ulnar, radial, and musculocutaneous nerves) of the brachial plexus measured at 20 min after injection. The secondary outcomes will consist of the sensory or motor blockade of all individual nerves, onset times, performance time, diaphragmatic paralysis, surgical anesthesia, and adverse events.DiscussionIt is expected that ultrasound-guided IA-SCB with the TI technique results in better block dynamic in patients undergoing upper limb arteriovenous access surgery.Trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2100045075.

Balloon angioplasty: A promising adjunct to arteriovenous fistula creation compared with hydrostatic dilatation in small-caliber cephalic veins.

To maintain the patency and longevity of arteriovenous fistula, the availability of a venous segment with adequate diameter is important. In Indian population, many chronic kidney disease patients have poor caliber veins. The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of hydrostatic dilatation versus Primary balloon angioplasty of small caliber cephalic veins of (≤2.5 mm) preoperatively in terms of patency rate and maturation time of arteriovenous fistula. Patients (n = 80) with an end-stage renal disease requiring arteriovenous access surgery for hemodialysis with small caliber cephalic veins were randomized into two groups, i.e., hydrostatic dilatation and primary balloon angioplasty, each with 40 patients. All patients underwent a thorough clinical examination as well as duplex ultrasound vein mapping of both upper extremities. Patients were followed up for six months and primary patency, maturation time, and complications were noted. Immediate technical success with good palpable thrill was achieved in 97.5% of patients in the primary balloon angioplasty group and 87.5% in the hydrostatic dilatation group. The fistula maturation time in the primary balloon angioplasty group was 34.41 days and 46.18 days in the hydrostatic dilatation group. In the primary balloon angioplasty group, the primary patency of the fistula was 97.5% and 87.5% in the hydrostatic dilatation group, at six months. The arteriovenous fistula functioning rate was 77.5% in the hydrostatic dilatation group as compared to 92.5% in the primary balloon angioplasty group at six months. The incidence of surgical site infection was 5% in the primary balloon angioplasty group as compared to 10% in the hydrostatic dilatation group. Primary balloon angioplasty of small caliber cephalic veins (≤2.5 mm) performed prior to arteriovenous fistula creation for hemodialysis is a beneficial procedure.

Arteriovenous Fistula Versus Graft Access Strategy in Older Adults Receiving Hemodialysis: A Pilot Randomized Trial

BackgroundIt is unclear whether surgical placement of an arteriovenous (AV) fistula (AVF) confers substantial clinical benefits over an AV graft (AVG) in older adults with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). We report vascular access outcomes of a pilot clinical trial.Study DesignPilot randomized parallel-group open-label trial.Setting & ParticipantsPatients 65 years and older with ESKD and no prior AV access receiving maintenance hemodialysis through a tunneled central venous catheter referred for AV access placement by their treating nephrologist.InterventionParticipants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to surgical placement of an AVG or AVF.OutcomesIndex AV access primary failure, successful cannulation, adjuvant interventions and infections.ResultsOf 122 older adults receiving hemodialysis and no prior AV access surgery, 24% died before (n = 18) or were too sick for (n = 11) referral for a permanent AV access. Of 46 eligible patients, 36 (78%) consented and were randomly assigned to AVG (n = 18) and AVF (n = 18) placement, of whom 13 (72%) and 16 (89%) underwent index AV access surgical placement, respectively. At a median follow-up of 321.0 days, primary AV access failure was noted in 31% in each group. The proportion of patients with successful cannulation was 62% (8 of 13) in the AVG and 50% (8 of 16) in the AVF group; median times to successful cannulation were 75.0 and 113.5 days, respectively. Endovascular procedures were recorded in 38% and 44%, and surgical reinterventions, in 23% and 25%, respectively. AV access infection was seen in 3 (23%) and 2 (13%) patients, respectively.LimitationsSmall sample size precludes statistical inference.ConclusionsAlmost one-quarter of older adults with incident ESKD and a central venous catheter as primary access were not referred for AV access placement due to medical reasons. Based on these limited results, there is little reason to favor either an AVF or AVG in this population until results from a larger randomized clinical trial become available.FundingGovernment funding to an author (Dr Murea is supported by National Institutes of Health∖National Institute on Aging grant 1R03 AG060178-01).Trial RegistrationNCT03545113.

Addition of serratus-intercostal plane block/BRILMA for arteriovenous access surgery

Arteriovenous access creation is mandatory in patients with end stage renal disease for hemodialysis treatment. It frequently involves upper arm or axillary dissection and general anaesthesia is predominantly used as axillary compartment innervation is complex. Avoiding general anaesthesia may be beneficial in these risk patients. We present two cases where serratus-intercostal plane block (SIPB/BRILMA) was used, along with ultrasound guided supraclavicular block and multimodal analgesia for proximal arm and axillary AV access surgery. Regional anaesthesia combination of supraclavicular and serratus-intercostal/BRILMA block in arteriovenous fistula surgery was successful and should be considered by anaesthesiologist in order to avoid general anaesthesia. Introducción : La creación de un acceso arteriovenoso es obligatorio en pacientes con enfermedad renal terminal para tratamiento con hemodiálisis. Habitualmente implica disección a nivel axilar o en la parte superior de brazo, y la anestesia general es usada predominantemente debido a que la inervación axilar es compleja. Evitar la anestesia general podría ser beneficioso en estos pacientes de riesgo. Presentamos dos casos en los que se empleó el bloqueo serrato-intercostal/BRILMA, junto con bloqueo supraclavicular ecoguiado y analgesia multimodal para cirugía de acceso arteriovenoso axilar o de brazo proximal. La combinación de técnicas de anestesia regional mediante bloqueo supraclavicular y serrato-intercostal/BRILMA en cirugía de fístula arteriovenosa fue exitosa y debe ser considerada por el anestesiólogo con el fin de evitar la anestesia general.

Regional anaesthesia practice for arteriovenous fistula formation surgery.

SummaryWe conducted a survey and semi‐structured qualitative interviews to investigate current anaesthetic practice for arteriovenous fistula formation surgery in the UK. Responses were received from 39 out of 59 vascular centres where arteriovenous access surgery is performed, a response rate of 66%. Thirty‐five centres reported routine use of brachial plexus blocks, but variation in anaesthetic skill‐mix and practice were observed. Interviews were conducted with 19 clinicians from 10 NHS Trusts including anaesthetists, vascular access and renal nurses, surgeons and nephrologists. Thematic analysis identified five key findings: (1) current anaesthetic practice showed that centres could be classified as ‘regional anaesthesia dominant’ or ‘local anaesthesia/mixed’; (2) decision making around mode of anaesthesia highlighted the key role of surgeons as frontline decision makers across both centre types; (3) perceived barriers and facilitators of regional block use included clinicians’ beliefs and preferences, resource considerations and patients’ treatment preferences; (4) anaesthetists’ preference for supraclavicular blocks emerged, alongside acknowledgement of varied practice; (5) there was widespread support for a future randomised controlled trial, although clinician equipoise issues and logistical/resource‐related concerns were viewed as potential challenges. The use of regional anaesthesia for arteriovenous fistula formation in the UK is varied and influenced by a multitude of factors. Despite the availability of anaesthetists capable of performing regional blocks, there are other limiting factors that influence the routine use of this technique. The study also highlighted the perceived need for a large multicentre, randomised controlled trial to provide an evidence base to inform current practice.

Transposition of basilic vein in forearm for arteriovenous fistula creation: Our mid-term results.

In this study, we aimed to present our mid-term results of basilic vein transposition in the forearm to create an arteriovenous fistula. Between January 2015 and October 2017, a total of 21 patients (13 males, 8 females; mean age 54.2±11.3 years; range, 32 to 74 years) with an adequate basilic vein and radial arterial systems who underwent basilic vein transposition in the forearm were retrospectively analyzed. All operations were performed under local anesthesia and mild sedation. The basilic vein was harvested using a single incision from elbow joint to wrist as an in situ vein graft. If the harvested basilic vein did not extend easily to the radial artery in the wrist region, the saphenous vein was harvested to extend arteriovenous fistula tract. The mean follow-up was 25.3±9.8 (range, 2 to 32) months. All patients underwent arteriovenous access surgery using transposed basilic vein in the forearm. In all patients, except for two, transposed basilic vein in the forearm stayed patent during follow-up with a patency rate of 90.5%. The mean fistula maturation time was 45.2±10.7 (range, 28 to 59) days. If cephalic vein diameters are too small for arteriovenous fistula creation, basilic vein system in the medial surface of the forearm may be considered a favorable option.

The Effect of Frailty on Outcome After Vascular Surgery

Frailty is a state of increased vulnerability and is a stronger predictor for post-operative outcome than age alone. The aim of this study was to determine whether frailty is associated with adverse 30 day outcome in vascular surgery patients. This was a prospective cohort study. All electively operated vascular surgery patients between March 2010 and October 2017 (n=1201), aged≥60 years were evaluated prospectively. Exclusion criteria were arteriovenous access surgery, percutaneous interventions and minor amputations, resulting in 825 patients for further analysis whereas 195 had incomplete data on Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI) and were excluded. Frailty was measured using the GFI, a screening tool covering 16 items in the domains of functioning. Patients with a total score of ≥4 were classified as frail. The primary outcome parameter was 30 day morbidity (based on the Comprehensive Complication Index). Secondary outcome measures were 30 day mortality, hospital readmission, and type of care facility after discharge. Outcomes were adjusted for sex, body mass index, smoking status, hypertension, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and type of intervention. There was an unequal sex distribution (77.6% male). The mean age was 72.1 years. One hundred and eighty-four patients (22.3%) were considered frail. The mean Comprehensive Complication Index was 8.5. Frail patients had a significantly higher Comprehensive Complication Index (3.7 point increase, p=.005). Patients with impaired cognition and reduced psychosocial condition, two domains of the GFI, had a significantly higher Comprehensive Complication Index. Also, the 30 day mortality rate was higher in frail patients (2.7 point increase; p=.05), and they were discharged to a care facility more often (7.7 point increase; p<.001). There was no significant difference in readmission rates between frail and non-frail patients. Frailty is associated with a higher risk of post-operative complications and discharge to a nursing home after vascular surgery. Some frailty domains (mobility, nutrition, cognition and psychosocial condition) appear to have a more pronounced impact.

A randomized pilot study comparing graft-first to fistula-first strategies in older patients with incident end-stage kidney disease: Clinical rationale and study design.

Timely placement of an arteriovenous (AV) vascular access (native AV fistula [AVF] or prosthetic AV graft [AVG]) is necessary to limit the use of tunneled central venous catheters (TCVC) in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) treated with hemodialysis (HD). National guidelines recommend placement of AVF as the AV access of first choice in all patients to improve patient survival. The benefits of AVF over AVG are less certain in the older adults, as age-related biological changes independently modulate patient outcomes. This manuscript describes the rationale, study design and protocol for a randomized controlled pilot study of the feasibility and effects of AVG-first access placement in older adults with no prior AV access surgery. Fifty patients age ≥65 years, with incident ESKD on HD via TCVC or advanced kidney disease facing imminent HD initiation, and suitable upper extremity vasculature for initial placement of an AVF or AVG, will be randomly assigned to receive either an upper extremity AVG-first (intervention) or AVF-first (comparator) access. The study will establish feasibility of randomizing older adults to the two types of AV access surgery, evaluate relationships between measurements of preoperative physical function and vascular access development, compare vascular access outcomes between groups, and gather longitudinal assessments of upper extremity muscle strength, gait speed, performance of activities of daily living, and patient satisfaction with their vascular access and quality of life. Results will assist with the planning of a larger, multicenter trial assessing patient-centered outcomes.

Vascular access surgery can be safely performed in an ambulatory setting.

Ambulatory surgery is associated with lower costs, but there is lack of evidence of the safety for ambulatory vascular access surgery. The objective of this study is to substantiate the safety and effectiveness of performing vascular access surgery in an ambulatory setting. A review of our prospectively maintained database including all vascular access open surgeries (creations and repairs) performed by our Vascular Access Unit between 2013 and 2017 was compiled. Patient comorbidities, surgery details, hospital admission conditions, and 1-week and 1-month follow-up patency and complications (death, infection, bleeding, and readmission/reintervention) were scrutinized. In the last 5 years, 1414 vascular access procedures were performed (67.8% access creations, 32.2% previous access repairs) in 1012 patients. Most surgeries were performed under local anesthesia (59.2%) or axillary plexus block (38.4%) and mainly in an ambulatory setting, without overnight hospital stays (90.9%). During the first postoperative week follow-up, 9 cases (0.6%) needed readmission or reintervention; significant infection materialized in 11 (0.8%) and 10 cases (0.7%) showed noteworthy hematoma or bleeding, only three (0.2%) requiring reintervention. The primary composite endpoint of 24-h death and 1 week readmission, reintervention, infection, or bleeding was 1.9% (27 cases); 1-month access failure was 6.2%. After univariate analysis, ambulatory settings were not related to higher rates of complications or readmissions. Arteriovenous access surgery can be safely performed in an ambulatory setting, in spite of complex cases, comorbidities, or the increasing implementation of axillary plexus blocks. Surgical results and patency are good, and complications necessitating readmission remain very low.

Adding a PECS II block for proximal arm arteriovenous access - a randomised study.

Brachial plexus block is often utilised for proximal arm arteriovenous access creation. However, the medial upper arm and axilla are often inadequately anaesthetised, requiring repeated, intraoperative local anaesthetic supplementation, or conversion into general anaesthesia. We hypothesised that the addition of a PECS II block would improve anaesthesia and analgesia for proximal arm arteriovenous access surgery. In this prospective, double-blinded, randomised proof-of-concept study, 36 consenting adults with end-stage renal disease aged between 21 and 90 years received either a combined supraclavicular and PECS II block (Group PECS, n = 18), or combined supraclavicular and sham block (Group SCB, n = 18) for proximal arm arteriovenous access surgery. Primary outcome was whether patients required intraoperative local anaesthetic supplementation by the surgeon. In Group PECS, 33.3% (6/18) needed local anaesthetic supplementation vs. 100% (18/18) in Group SCB. Group SCB had three times (RR 3.0, 95% CI 1.6-5.8; P < 0.001) the risk of requiring intraoperative local anaesthetic supplementation. Group PECS required lower volume of supplemental local anaesthetic compared to Group SCB (0.0 ml, IQR 0.0-6.3 ml vs. 15.0 ml, IQR 7.4-17.8 ml; P < 0.001). Group SCB had twice [RR 2.2, 95% CI 1.1-4.4; (P = 0.019)] the risk of needing additional sedation or analgesia. There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to postoperative visual analogue scale pain scores, time to first rescue analgesia or patient satisfaction. The results suggest that adding a PECS II block to a supraclavicular block improves regional anaesthesia for patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing proximal arm arteriovenous access surgery.

Vascular access placement in patients with chronic kidney disease Stages 4 and 5 attending an inner city nephrology clinic: a cohort study and survey of providers

BackgroundThe majority of incident hemodialysis (HD) patients initiate dialysis via catheters. We sought to identify factors associated with initiating hemodialysis with a functioning arterio-venous (AV) access.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective chart review of all adult patients, age >18 years seeing a nephrologist with a diagnosis of CKD stage 4 or 5 during the study period between 06/01/2011 and 08/31/2013 to evaluate the placement of an AV access, initiation of dialysis and we conducted a survey of providers about the process.ResultsThe 221 patients (56% female) in the study had median age of 66 years (interquartile range (IQR), 57–75) and were followed for a median of 1.26 years (IQR 0.6–1.68). At study entry, 81%had CKD stage 4 and 19% had CKD stage 5. By the end of study, 48 patients had initiated dialysis. Thirty-four of the patients started dialysis with a catheter (1 failed and 10 maturing AVFs), 9 with an AVF and 5 with an AVG. During the study period, 61 total AV accesses were placed (54 AVF and 7 AVG). A higher urinary protein/ creatinine ratio and a lower eGFR were associated with AV access placement and dialysis initiation. A greater number of nephrology visits were associated with AV access creation but not dialysis initiation. Hospitalizations and hospitalizations with an episode of acute kidney injury (AKI) were strongly associated with dialysis initiation (odds ratio (OR) 13.0 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.3 to 73.3, p-value = 0.004) and OR 6.6 (95% CI 1.9 to 22.8, p-value = 0.003)).ConclusionsMore frequent nephrology clinic visits for patients with a recent hospitalization may improve rates of placement of an AV access. A hospitalization with AKI is strongly associated with the need for dialysis initiation. Nephrologists may not be referring the correct patients to get an AV access surgery.

Primary Balloon Angioplasty or Hydrostatic Dilatation for Arteriovenous Access: Which Technique has Better Outcomes in Poor Caliber Cephalic Veins?

Background: The success of hemodialysis depends on a functioning vascular access. The most important factor limiting the arteriovenous fistula (AVF) growth and patency is the availability of a good caliber venous segment: Cephalic veins smaller than 2.5 mm have been reported to have increased failure rates. Unfortunately, in the Indian population, we frequently come across patients with a poor cephalic vein diameter ≤2 mm. The present study was done to evaluate if primary balloon angioplasty (PBA) of these small cephalic veins could improve the primary patency rates and maturation time of autogenous AVFs, and also to compare this technique with the standard hydrostatic dilatation technique. Materials and Methods: Sixty patients requiring arteriovenous access surgery (but having small cephalic veins (≤2 mm) were randomized into two groups of thirty patients each. All patients underwent a thorough preoperative evaluation, after which they were subjected to AVF surgery. Thirty of these patients underwent standard hydrostatic dilatation (HD) whereas the remaining thirty were offered PBA of the vein before creating the fistula. These patients were followed up for 6 months and primary patency, reintervention rates, and maturation times were recorded. Results: Immediate technical success was 100% in the PBA group, with 6-month primary patency of 93.3%, whereas HD group had 73.3% immediate success and a 6-month primary patency of 63.3%. In HD group, 36.7% patients underwent re-intervention over a follow-up of 6 months, as compared to only 6.7% in PBA group. The average maturation time for PBA group was 32.83 days, whereas in HD group, it was 52.53 days. Conclusions: PBA of very small cephalic veins (≤2 mm) is a safe and feasible procedure. The technique is associated with excellent primary patency rates and decreased maturation time, significantly decreases the need for re-intervention, and is superior to the standard hydrostatic dilatation technique. It has the potential to maximize the number of patients with autogenous AVF by including those patients who have been rejected due to small cephalic veins.

Management and outcomes of dialysis access-associated steal syndrome

Dialysis access-associated steal syndrome (DASS) complicates arteriovenous access surgery. We describe a 10-year experience with the surgical management of DASS. DASS operations were retrospectively reviewed from July 2003 to July 2013 from a single academic institution. Demographics, symptoms, surgical details, and outcomes were collected. A total of 201 patients had 218 episodes of DASS. Mean age was 65 years, and 62% were women. DASS was caused by 175 arteriovenous fistulas (80%), 41 upper extremity prosthetic grafts (19%), and two thigh grafts (1%); 87% were brachial artery based. A portion (22%) were referred for DASS from outside practices. All patients had grade 2 (48%) or grade 3 (52%) DASS; 92% (185) were available for follow-up, with a median time to first follow-up of 23 days. Surgical procedures included ligation (73), distal revascularization with interval ligation (DRIL) (59), revision using distal inflow (RUDI) (21), banding (38), proximalization of arterial inflow (12), and distal radial artery ligation (13). There were no differences in preoperative comorbidities between treatment groups. The 30-day complications included continued steal, thrombosis, bleeding, infection, and mortality. Ligation and DRIL were performed most often for grade 3 steal. Ligation and banding were performed most acutely (median time to intervention after access creation of 39 and 24 days vs DRIL and RUDI at 97 and 100 days). Fistula preservation was 0% for ligation, 100% for DRIL, 95% for RUDI, and 89% for banding (P < .01). Improvement of symptoms ranged from 75% (banding) to 98% (DRIL) (P = .005). Women were less likely to have DRIL but more likely to have ligation (P = .001). Complications were highest in the banding (49%) and RUDI (37%) groups. Average mortality was 3.5%, with no significant differences among groups. During the study period, 3287 access procedures were performed, and access volume steadily increased (2003-2008, 1312 access creations; 2008-2013, 1975). Percentage of fistulas (79% vs 86%), incidence of steal (4% vs 6%), and percentage of DRILs (25% vs 28%) were consistent across the two study periods. DRIL and ligation were performed in patients with the most severe symptoms. Compared with ligation, DRIL has equal symptom resolution, no increase in complications, and fistula preservation. Compared with banding, DRIL resulted in superior fistula preservation and fewer complications. DRIL should be considered the preferred procedure for management of DASS in patients with a functioning autologous fistula who can tolerate a major operation.

Vascular access in hemodialysis patients older than 80 years

There is a worldwide surge in numbers of elderly people requiring hemodialysis accompanying the prevailing increase in longevity. There is a trend for central venous catheters to be preferentially placed in elderly patients, whereas others recommend routine use of grafts for surgical access. In our center, age has not been a consideration in deciding to construct arteriovenous access for hemodialysis. We reviewed our experience with arteriovenous access surgery in all hemodialysis patients aged 80 years and older to determine if this approach is justified in terms of patency and life expectancy. A retrospective study was made of all patients aged 80 years and older who had surgery from January 2005 to December 2009 at our national vascular access referral center. All patients had preoperative mapping and had fistula construction if the vein size was at least 3 mm. Otherwise they had brachiobasilic or brachioaxillary grafts. All patients had routine access surveillance by Doppler ultrasound (duplex) and physical examination at regular intervals, and interventions were carried out according to the findings. Type of access, success rate, maturation, primary and secondary patency, and patient survival in the age group older than 80 years were noted. During the study period, 134 patients had 146 new accesses. There were 128 autogenous accesses (30 forearm, 91 upper arm, and seven transposed basilic veins) and 18 prosthetic accesses. Overall primary patency was 39%, 33%, and 23% at 12, 24, and 36 months. Secondary patency was 92%, 83%, and 77% at 12, 24, and 36 months. There was no significant difference in patency between the different types of accesses and between diabetic and nondiabetic patients. Eleven upper arm and four forearm fistulas had delayed maturation or nonmaturation. The relative risk for delayed maturation or nonmaturation of forearm fistulas (13.3%) compared with brachial-cephalic fistula (12.1%) was 1.1030 (95% confidence interval, 0.3973-3.204; P = .8571). Median patient survival was 38 months, with 49 dying during follow-up. Contrary to recent recommendations favoring grafts for hemodialysis in patients older than 80 years, most elderly patients in this study were found to have vasculature that was suitable for autogenous access construction, with patency rates similar to those of their younger counterparts when adequate preoperative planning and postoperative maintenance were carried out. Age alone should not disqualify patients older than 80 years from access surgery for hemodialysis, nor should age disqualify these patients from the Fistula First Initiative.

Behandlung von Komplikationen nach Anlage von AV-Gefäßzugängen

The choice of potential options for an arteriovenous (AV) access is limited for each individual patient. Complications shorten the maximum life span of any AV access. This paper stresses the importance of recognizing complications in time so as to initiate early and adequate therapy which are explained in further detail. Existing vascular accesses should be used as long as possible while maintaining further alternatives for future AV access surgery.