Arterial Phase Hyperenhancement Research Articles

MRI radiomics based on deep learning automated segmentation to predict early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma.

To investigate the utility of deep learning (DL) automated segmentation-based MRI radiomic features and clinical-radiological characteristics in predicting early recurrence after curative resection of single hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This single-center, retrospective study included consecutive patients with surgically proven HCC who underwent contrast-enhanced MRI before curative hepatectomy from December 2009 to December 2021. Using 3D U-net-based DL algorithms, automated segmentation of the liver and HCC was performed on six MRI sequences. Radiomic features were extracted from the tumor, tumor border extensions (5 mm, 10 mm, and 20 mm), and the liver. A hybrid model incorporating the optimal radiomic signature and preoperative clinical-radiological characteristics was constructed via Cox regression analyses for early recurrence. Model discrimination was characterized with C-index and time-dependent area under the receiver operating curve (tdAUC) and compared with the widely-adopted BCLC and CNLC staging systems. Four hundred and thirty-four patients (median age, 52.0 years; 376 men) were included. Among all radiomic signatures, HCC with 5 mm tumor border extension and liver showed the optimal predictive performance (training set C-index, 0.696). By incorporating this radiomic signature, rim arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE), and incomplete tumor "capsule," a hybrid model demonstrated a validation set C-index of 0.706 and superior 2-year tdAUC (0.743) than both the BCLC (0.550; p < 0.001) and CNLC (0.635; p = 0.032) systems. This model stratified patients into two prognostically distinct risk strata (both datasets p < 0.001). A preoperative imaging model incorporating the DL automated segmentation-based radiomic signature with rim APHE and incomplete tumor "capsule" accurately predicted early postsurgical recurrence of a single HCC. The DL automated segmentation-based MRI radiomic model with rim APHE and incomplete tumor "capsule" hold the potential to facilitate individualized risk estimation of postsurgical early recurrence in a single HCC. A hybrid model integrating MRI radiomic signature was constructed for early recurrence prediction of HCC. The hybrid model demonstrated superior 2-year AUC than the BCLC and CNLC systems. The model categorized the low-risk HCC group carried longer RFS.

Correlation between CEUS LI-RADS categorization of HCC < 20 mm and clinic-pathological features

ObjectiveTo retrospectively evaluate the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) LI-RADS in liver nodules < 20 mm at high risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and their correlation with clinic-pathological features.MethodsA total of 432 pathologically proved liver nodules < 20 mm were included from January 2019 to June 2022. Each nodule was categorized as LI-RADS grade (LR)-1 to LR-5 through LR-M according to CEUS LI-RADS. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC) of CEUS LI-RADS were evaluated using pathological reference standard. Correlations between clinic-pathological features and CEUS LI-RADS categorization, together with major CEUS features, were further explored.ResultsWith LR-5 to diagnose HCC, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC were 50.3%, 70.0%, 91.2%, 18.5%, and 0.601, respectively. The proportion of LR-5 in primary HCCs was significantly higher than that in recurrent ones (p = 0.014). HCC 10–19 mm showed significantly more frequent arterial phase hyper-enhancement (APHE) and late washout (p < 0.05) and less no-washout (p = 0.003) compared with those in HCC < 10 mm. Well-differentiated HCCs showed more frequent non-APHE and no-washout than moderate- and poor-differentiated HCCs (p < 0.05). Upgrading “APHE without washout” LR-4 nodules 10–19 mm with HCC history and “APHE with late mild washout” LR-4 nodules < 10 mm to LR-5 could improve the diagnostic performance of LR-5. The corresponding sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC are 60.2%, 70.0%, 92.6%, 22.1%, and 0.651, respectively.ConclusionsCEUS LI-RADS is valuable in the diagnosis of HCC < 20 mm and performance can be improved with the combination of clinic-pathological features.Critical relevance statementCEUS LI-RADS was valuable in the diagnosis of HCC < 20 mm and its diagnostic performance can be improved by combining clinic-pathological features. Further research is needed to define its value in this set of lesions.Key PointsContrast-enhanced ultrasound can detect small liver lesions where LI-RADS accuracy is uncertain.Many LI-RADS Grade-4 nodules were upgraded to Grade-5 by combining imaging with clinic-pathological factors.The reclassification of LI-RADS Grade-5 can improve sensitivity without decreasing positive predictive value.Graphical

Clinical and Radiologic Predictors of Response to Atezolizumab-Bevacizumab in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

This study aimed to identify clinical and radiologic characteristics that could predict response to atezolizumab-bevacizumab combination therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This single-center retrospective study included 108 advanced HCC patients with intrahepatic lesions who were treated with atezolizumab-bevacizumab. Two radiologists independently analyzed Imaging characteristics of the index tumor on pretreatment computed tomography. Predictive factors associated with progressive disease (PD) at the best response based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, Version 1.1 were evaluated using logistic regression analysis. Progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. Of 108 patients with a median PFS of 15 weeks, 40 (37.0%) had PD during treatment. Factors associated with PD included the presence of extrahepatic metastases (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19-14.35; p=0.03), the infiltrative appearance of the tumor (aOR, 3.07; 95% CI, 1.05-8.93; p=0.04), and the absence of arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) (aOR, 6.34; 95% CI, 2.18-18.47; p<0.001). Patients with two or more of these factors had a PD of 66.7% and a median PFS of 8 weeks, indicating a significantly worse outcome compared to the patients with one or no of these factors. In patients with advanced HCC treated with atezolizumab-bevacizumab treatment, the absence of APHE, infiltrative appearance of the intrahepatic tumor, and presence of extrahepatic metastases were associated with poor response and survival. Evaluation of early response may be necessary in patients with these factors.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with arterial phase hyperenhancement and specialized tumor microenvironment associated with good prognosis after radical resection: A single-center retrospective study

BackgroundThis single-center retrospective study aimed to clarify the clinical and pathologic background of mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas. MethodsA total of 53 patients with mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas were selected from 2007 to 2021 and analyzed based on several parameters, including the preoperative computed tomography pattern (enhancement in the arterial phase of dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography), clinical data, and tumor microenvironment evaluated by immunohistochemistry. The hyperenhancement (n = 13) and hypoenhancement (n = 40) groups were defined using the 50% cutoff of tumors with higher attenuation than the liver parenchyma. ResultsThe hyperenhancement group was characterized by a better overall survival than the hypoenhancement group (5-year survival: 86% vs 27%, respectively; P < .001) and by a higher infiltration of peritumoral (92% vs 58%; P = .020) and intratumoral CD3-positive T lymphocytes (85% vs 35%; P = .002). Conversely, the hypoenhancement group was characterized by a higher infiltration versus peritumoral CD163-positive tumor-associated macrophages (60% vs 8%; P = .001), peritumoral pentraxin 3–positive tumor-associated macrophages (50% vs 15%; P = .024), and intratumoral α–smooth muscle actin–positive cancer-associated fibroblasts (15% vs 68%; P = .001). A multiple regression analysis was performed to predict overall survival from the microenvironment, and the independent poor predictor factors were low intratumoral CD3-positive T lymphocytes (hazard ratio = 2.75), high peritumoral (hazard ratio = 2.38), and intratumoral CD163-positive tumor-associated macrophages (hazard ratio = 2.81) (all P values < 0.05). ConclusionCompared with hypovascular, hypervascular mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas have better tumor immunity and prognosis.

Using GPT-4 for LI-RADS feature extraction and categorization with multilingual free-text reports.

The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) offers a standardized approach for imaging hepatocellular carcinoma. However, the diverse styles and structures of radiology reports complicate automatic data extraction. Large language models hold the potential for structured data extraction from free-text reports. Our objective was to evaluate the performance of Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT)-4 in extracting LI-RADS features and categories from free-text liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reports. Three radiologists generated 160 fictitious free-text liver MRI reports written in Korean and English, simulating real-world practice. Of these, 20 were used for prompt engineering, and 140 formed the internal test cohort. Seventy-two genuine reports, authored by 17 radiologists were collected and de-identified for the external test cohort. LI-RADS features were extracted using GPT-4, with a Python script calculating categories. Accuracies in each test cohort were compared. On the external test, the accuracy for the extraction of major LI-RADS features, which encompass size, nonrim arterial phase hyperenhancement, nonperipheral 'washout', enhancing 'capsule' and threshold growth, ranged from .92 to .99. For the rest of the LI-RADS features, the accuracy ranged from .86 to .97. For the LI-RADS category, the model showed an accuracy of .85 (95% CI: .76, .93). GPT-4 shows promise in extracting LI-RADS features, yet further refinement of its prompting strategy and advancements in its neural network architecture are crucial for reliable use in processing complex real-world MRI reports.

Diagnostic Model for Proliferative HCC Using LI-RADS: Assessing Therapeutic Outcomes in Hepatectomy and TKI-ICI Combination.

Proliferative hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), aggressive with poor prognosis, and lacks reliable MRI diagnosis. To develop a diagnostic model for proliferative HCC using liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) and assess its prognostic value. Retrospective. 241 HCC patients underwent hepatectomy (90 proliferative HCCs: 151 nonproliferative HCCs), divided into the training (N = 167) and validation (N = 74) sets. 57 HCC patients received combination therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). 3.0 T, T1- and T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, in- and out-phase, T1 high resolution isotropic volume excitation and dynamic gadoxetic acid-enhanced imaging. LI-RADS v2018 and other MRI features (intratumoral artery, substantial hypoenhancing component, hepatobiliary phase peritumoral hypointensity, and irregular tumor margin) were assessed. A diagnostic model for proliferative HCC was established, stratifying patients into high- and low-risk groups. Follow-up occurred every 3-6 months, and recurrence-free survival (RFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in different groups were compared. Fisher's test or chi-square test, t-test or Mann-Whitney test, logistic regression, Harrell's concordance index (C-index), Kaplan-Meier curves, and Cox proportional hazards. Significance level: P < 0.05. The diagnostic model, incorporating corona enhancement, rim arterial phase hyperenhancement, infiltrative appearance, intratumoral artery, and substantial hypoenhancing component, achieved a C-index of 0.823 (training set) and 0.804 (validation set). Median follow-up was 32.5 months (interquartile range [IQR], 25.1 months) for postsurgery patients, and 16.8 months (IQR: 13.2 months) for combination-treated patients. 99 patients experienced recurrence, and 30 demonstrated tumor nonresponse. Differences were significant in RFS and OS rates between high-risk and low-risk groups post-surgery (40.3% vs. 65.8%, 62.3% vs. 90.1%, at 5 years). In combination-treated patients, PFS rates differed significantly (80.6% vs. 7.7% at 2 years). The MR-based model could pre-treatment identify proliferative HCC and assist in prognosis evaluation. Stage 2.

Inter-reader Agreement for CT/MRI LI-RADS Category M Imaging Features: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

To systematically evaluate inter-reader agreement in the assessment of individual Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) category M (LR-M) imaging features in computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI) LI-RADS v2018, and to explore the causes of poor agreement in LR-M assignment. Original studies reporting inter-reader agreement for LR-M features on multiphasic CT or MRI were identified using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. The pooled kappa coefficient (κ) was calculated using the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q test and I2 statistics. Subgroup meta-regression analyses were conducted to explore the study heterogeneity. In total, 24 eligible studies with 5,163 hepatic observations were included. The pooled κ values were 0.72 (95% confidence interval, 0.65-0.78) for rim arterial phase hyperenhancement, 0.52 (0.39-0.65) for peripheral washout, 0.60 (0.50-0.70) for delayed central enhancement, 0.68 (0.57-0.78) for targetoid restriction, 0.74 (0.65-0.83) for targetoid transitional phase/hepatobiliary phase appearance, 0.64 (0.49-0.78) for infiltrative appearance, 0.49 (0.30-0.68) for marked diffusion restriction, and 0.61 (0.48-0.73) for necrosis or severe ischemia. Substantial study heterogeneity was observed for all LR-M features (Cochran's Q test: p < 0.01; I2 ≥ 89.2%). Studies with a mean observation size of <3 cm, those performed using 1.5-T MRI, and those with multiple image readers, were significantly associated with poor agreement of LR-M features. The agreement for peripheral washout and marked diffusion restriction was limited. The LI-RADS should focus on improving the agreement of LR-M features.

A Modified Targetoid Feature Emphasizing Thin-Rim APHE to Improve the Diagnostic Performance of LI-RADS for Malignant Hepatic Tumors.

To identify imaging features that help distinguish between HCCs and non-HCC malignancies assigned to LI-RADS M (LR-M) and evaluate the diagnostic performance of a LI-RADS with targetoid criteria using thin-rim arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE). This retrospective study included 381 patients (387 observations) at high-risk for HCC who underwent enhanced-MRI before surgery. Three radiologists reviewed images for LI-RADS categorization of hepatic observations. Univariate and multivariate analysis was conducted to determine reliable features to differentiate between HCC and non-HCC malignancies among the LR-M lesions. The thin-rim (<30%) APHE was defined based on the thickest thickness of rim APHE compared with the tumor radius, and a modified LI-RADS emphasizing thin-rim APHE as a specific feature of LR-M was established. We compared the diagnostic performance of modified LR-M and LI-RADS 5 (LR-5) with the conventional one. Thin-rim APHE and targetoid diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) were found as independent predictive factors of non-HCC malignancies, while enhancing capsule, thick-rim APHE and peripheral washout were noted as independent variables significantly associated with HCC of LR-M (P<0.05). The noticeable diagnostic performance of thin-rim APHE in distinguishing non-HCC malignancies from HCCs using the ROC curve. Emphasizing thin-rim APHE on targetoid features, the modified LR-M revealed significantly superior specificity and accuracy (89.4% vs 81.1%, P=0.004; and 87.9% vs 82.2%, P=0.027, respectively) while maintaining high sensitivity (82.2% vs 86.0%; P=0.529) compared with the LR-M. Meanwhile, the modified LR-5 achieved greater sensitivity and accuracy (88.6% vs 79.7%, P=0.004; and 85.8% vs 80.1%, P=0.036, respectively) for diagnosing HCC, without compromising specificity (78.3% vs.81.1%; P=0.608) compared with the LR-5. Thin-rim APHE may be the specific imaging feature for differentiating non-HCC malignancies from HCCs within LR-M. The modified targetoid criteria emphasizing thin-rim APHE can improve the diagnostic performance of LI-RADS for hepatic malignancies.

MRI imaging features for predicting macrotrabecular-massive subtype hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

To identify significant MRI features associated with macrotrabecular-massive hepatocellular carcinoma (MTM-HCC), and to assess the distribution of Liver Imaging Radiology and Data System (LI-RADS, LR) category assignments. PubMed and EMBASE were searched up to March 28, 2023. Random-effects model was constructed to calculate pooled diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each MRI feature for differentiating MTM-HCC from NMTM-HCC. The pooled proportions of LI-RADS category assignments in MTM-HCC and NMTM-HCC were compared using z-test. Ten studies included 1978 patients with 2031 HCCs (426 (20.9%) MTM-HCC and 1605 (79.1%) NMTM-HCC). Six MRI features showed significant association with MTM-HCC: tumor in vein (TIV) (DOR = 2.4 [95% CI, 1.6-3.5]), rim arterial phase hyperenhancement (DOR =2.6 [95% CI, 1.4-5.0]), corona enhancement (DOR = 2.6 [95% CI, 1.4-4.5]), intratumoral arteries (DOR = 2.6 [95% CI, 1.1-6.3]), peritumoral hypointensity on hepatobiliary phase (DOR = 2.2 [95% CI, 1.5-3.3]), and necrosis (DOR = 4.2 [95% CI, 2.0-8.5]). The pooled proportions of LI-RADS categories in MTM-HCC were LR-3, 0% [95% CI, 0-2%]; LR-4, 11% [95% CI, 6-16%]; LR-5, 63% [95% CI, 55-71%]; LR-M, 12% [95% CI, 6-19%]; and LR-TIV, 13% [95% CI, 6-22%]. In NMTM-HCC, the pooled proportions of LI-RADS categories were LR-3, 1% [95% CI, 0-2%]; LR-4, 8% [95% CI, 3-15%]; LR-5, 77% [95% CI, 71-82%]; LR-M, 5% [95% CI, 3-7%]; and LR-TIV, 6% [95% CI, 2-11%]. MTM-HCC had significantly lower proportion of LR-5 and higher proportion of LR-M and LR-TIV categories. Six MRI features showed significant association with MTM-HCC. Additionally, compared to NMTM-HCC, MTM-HCC are more likely to be categorized LR-M and LR-TIV and less likely to be categorized LR-5. Several MR imaging features can suggest macrotrabecular-massive hepatocellular carcinoma subtype, which can assist in guiding treatment plans and identifying potential candidates for clinical trials of new treatment strategies. • Macrotrabecular-massive hepatocellular carcinoma is a subtype of HCC characterized by its aggressive nature and unfavorable prognosis. • Tumor in vein, rim arterial phase hyperenhancement, corona enhancement, intratumoral arteries, peritumoral hypointensity on hepatobiliary phase, and necrosis on MRI are indicative of macrotrabecular-massive hepatocellular carcinoma. • Various MRI characteristics can be utilized for the diagnosis of the macrotrabecular-massive hepatocellular carcinoma subtype. This can prove beneficial in guiding treatment decisions and identifying potential candidates for clinical trials involving novel treatment approaches.

How to differentiate between combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with rim arterial phase hyperenhancement?

To analyze and compare the differences in MRI features between combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) with arterial phase peripheral enhancement, so as to provide valuable references for preoperative differential diagnosis. Seventy cHCC-CCA patients and 74 iCCA patients confirmed by pathology were included in this study. Their contrast-enhanced MRI showed rim arterial phase hyperenhancement (Rim APHE). The differences of clinicopathological data and MRI features between cHCC-CCA and iCCA were compared. Then, the sensitivity, specificity, and area under curve (AUC) were also analyzed and compared. Seventy cHCC-CCA patients (mean age, 55.7 ± 10.6years) and 74 iCCA patients (mean age, 61.1 ± 10.5years) were evaluated. In this study, univariable and multivariable regression analysis showed that AFP > 20ng/ml (OR = 5.824, p = 0.006), enhancing capsule (OR = 7.252, p = 0.001), and mosaic architecture (OR = 32.732, p < 0.001) were independent risk factors of cHCC-CCA with Rim APHE. However, only hepatic capsule retraction (OR = 0.091, p < 0.001) was an independent predictor of iCCA. In addition, combining AFP > 20ng/ml with enhancing capsule (96.7% vs. 79.2%, p < 0.001) and/or mosaic architecture (96.4% vs. 94.7%, p < 0.001) can improve the sensitivity of differentiating cHCC-CCA (vs. iCCA) with Rim APHE. The combination of elevated AFP and MRI features, such as enhancing capsule and mosaic architecture, will help in preoperative differential diagnosis of cHCC-CCA and iCCA with Rim APHE.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound With Perfluorobutane for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Diagnosis: Comparison of Imaging Phases and Diagnostic Criteria.

BACKGROUND. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with perfluorobutane has used varying protocols and diagnostic criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article was to assess diagnostic performance for HCC of CEUS with perfluorobutane in high-risk patients using various criteria. METHODS. This retrospective post hoc study evaluating individual patient data from three earlier prospective studies from one hospital included 204 patients (136 men, 68 women; mean age, 63 ± 11 [SD] years) at high risk of HCC with 213 liver observations. Patients underwent CEUS using perfluorobutane from March 2019 to June 2022. Three radiologists (the examination's operator and two subsequent reviewers) independently interpreted examinations, assessing arterial, portal venous (arterial phase completion through 2 minutes), transitional (2-5 minutes after injection), and Kupffer (≥ 10 minutes after injection) phase findings. Six criteria for HCC were tested: 1, any arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) with Kupffer phase hypoenhancement; 2, nonrim APHE with Kupffer phase hypoenhancement; 3, nonrim APHE with portal venous washout; 4, nonrim APHE with portal venous washout and/or Kupffer phase hypoenhancement; 5, nonrim APHE with portal venous and/or transitional washout; 6, nonrim APHE with any of portal venous washout, transitional washout, or Kupffer phase hypoenhancement. Depending on the criteria, observations were instead deemed to be a non-HCC malignancy if showing rim APHE, early washout (at < 1 minute), or marked washout (at 2 minutes). Reference was pathology for malignant observations and pathology or imaging follow-up for benign observations. Diagnostic performance was assessed, pooling readers' data. RESULTS. Criterion 1 (no recognized features of non-HCC malignancy) had highest sensitivity (86.9%) but lowest specificity (43.2%) for HCC. Compared with nonrim APHE and portal venous washout (criterion 3), the addition of Kupffer phase hypoenhancement (criterion 4), transitional washout (criterion 5), or either feature (criterion 6) significantly increased sensitivity (34.4% vs 62.6-64.2%) and accuracy (61.8% vs 75.1-76.5%), but significantly decreased specificity (98.5% vs 91.9-94.1%). Criteria 2, 4, 5, and 6 (all incorporating transitional washout and/or Kupffer phase hypoenhancement) showed no significant differences in sensitivity (62.6-64.2%), specificity (91.9-94.1%), or accuracy (75.1-76.5%). CONCLUSION. Recognition of features of non-HCC malignancy improved specificity for HCC. Incorporation of the findings of transitional washout and/or Kupffer phase hypoenhancement improved sensitivity and accuracy, albeit lowered specificity, versus arterial and portal venous findings alone, without further performance variation among criteria incorporating those two findings. CLINICAL IMPACT. Kupffer phase acquisition may be optional for observations classified as HCC or non-HCC malignancy by arterial, portal venous, and transitional phases.

Comparison contrast-enhanced CT with contrast-enhanced US in diagnosing combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score-matched study

ObjectivesTo develop and compare noninvasive models for differentiating between combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) and HCC based on serum tumor markers, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), and computed tomography (CECT).MethodsFrom January 2010 to December 2021, patients with pathologically confirmed cHCC-CCA or HCC who underwent both preoperative CEUS and CECT were retrospectively enrolled. Propensity scores were calculated to match cHCC-CCA and HCC patients with a near-neighbor ratio of 1:2. Two predicted models, a CEUS-predominant (CEUS features plus tumor markers) and a CECT-predominant model (CECT features plus tumor markers), were constructed using logistic regression analyses. Model performance was evaluated by the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.ResultsA total of 135 patients (mean age, 51.3 years ± 10.9; 122 men) with 135 tumors (45 cHCC-CCA and 90 HCC) were included. By logistic regression analysis, unclear boundary in the intratumoral nonenhanced area, partial washout on CEUS, CA 19-9 > 100 U/mL, lack of cirrhosis, incomplete tumor capsule, and nonrim arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) volume < 50% on CECT were independent factors for a diagnosis of cHCC-CCA. The CECT-predominant model showed almost perfect sensitivity for cHCC-CCA, unlike the CEUS-predominant model (93.3% vs. 55.6%, p < 0.001). The CEUS-predominant model showed higher diagnostic specificity than the CECT-predominant model (80.0% vs. 63.3%; p = 0.020), especially in the ≤ 5 cm subgroup (92.0% vs. 70.0%; p = 0.013).ConclusionsThe CECT-predominant model provides higher diagnostic sensitivity than the CEUS-predominant model for CHCC-CCA. Combining CECT features with serum CA 19-9 > 100 U/mL shows excellent sensitivity.Critical relevance statementCombining lack of cirrhosis, incomplete tumor capsule, and nonrim arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) volume < 50% on CECT with serum CA 19-9 > 100 U/mL shows excellent sensitivity in differentiating cHCC-CCA from HCC.Key points1. Accurate differentiation between cHCC-CCA and HCC is essential for treatment decisions.2. The CECT-predominant model provides higher accuracy than the CEUS-predominant model for CHCC-CCA.3. Combining CECT features and CA 19-9 levels shows a sensitivity of 93.3% in diagnosing cHCC-CCA.Graphical

Based on Gadolinium Ethoxybenzyl DTPA-Enhanced MRI: Diagnostic Performance of the Category-Modified LR-5 Criteria in Patients At Risk for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Introduction: We aimed to modify the LR-5 strategy to improve the diagnostic sensitivity for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in high-risk patients while maintaining specificity. Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed 412 patients with 445 liver observations who underwent preoperative gadolinium ethoxybenzyl DTPA (GD-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced MRI followed by surgical procedures or biopsies. All observations were classified according to LI-RADS v2018, and the classifications were adjusted by modifying major features (MF)(substituting threshold growth with a more HCC-specific ancillary features (AF): presence of blood products within the mass, arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) was interpreted with hypointensity on precontrast imaging- isointensity in arterial phase (AP) and extending washout to transitional phase (TP)(2 min)). The specificity, sensitivity, and positive predictive value (PPV) were assessed to compare LR-5 (definitely HCC) diagnostic efficacy between LI-RADS version 2018 and modified LI-RADS. Results: Apart from nonenhancing "capsule", the interreader agreement of MFs and HCC-specific AFs between the two readers reached substantial or excellent ranges (κ values ranging from 0.631 to 0.911). According to LI-5 v2018, the specificity, sensitivity and PPV of HCC were 90.74%, 82.35%, and 98.17%, respectively. Based on a more HCC-specific AF, signal intensity in AP and TP (2 min), the sensitivity of the three modified strategies were 86.19%, 93.09%, 96.67% (P < .05)), while maintaining high specificity and PPV rates at 88.89% and 98.25% (P > .05) Conclusion: Further investigation into the efficacy of threshold growth as a MF is warranted. By utilizing GD-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI, enhancing the sensitivity of the modified LR-5 category may be achieved without compromising specificity and PPV in diagnosing HCC among high-risk patients.

Are dilution, slow injection and care bolus technique the causal solution to mitigating arterial-phase artifacts on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI? A large-cohort study.

Arterial-phase artifacts are gadoxetic acid (GA)-enhanced MRI's major drawback, ranging from 5 to 39%. We evaluate the effect of dilution and slow injection of GA using automated fluoroscopic triggering on liver MRI arterial-phase (AP) acquisition timing, artifact frequency, and lesion visibility. Saline-diluted 1:1 GA was injected at 1ml/s into 1413 patients for 3T liver MRI. Initially, one senior abdominal radiologist, i.e., principal investigator (PI), assessed all MR exams and compared them to previous and follow-up images, as well as the radiology report on record, determining the standard of reference for lesion detection and characterization. Then, three other readers independently evaluated the AP images for artifact type (truncation (TA), transient severe motion (TSM) or mixed), artifact severity (on a 5-point scale), acquisition timing (on a 4-point scale) and visibility (on a 5-point scale) of hypervascular lesions ≥ 5mm, selected by the PI. Artifact score ≥ 4 and artifact score ≤ 3 were considered significant and non-significant artifacts, respectively. Of the 1413 exams, diagnostic-quality arterial-phase images included 1100 (77.8%) without artifacts, 220 (15.6%) with minimal, and 77 (5.4%) with moderate artifacts. Only 16 exams (1.1%) had significant artifacts, 13 (0.9%) with severe artifacts (score 4), and three (0.2%) non-diagnostic artifacts (score 5). AP acquisition timing was optimal in 1369 (96.8%) exams. Of the 449 AP hypervascular lesions, 432 (96.2%) were detected. Combined dilution and slow injection of GA with MR results in well-timed arterial-phase images in 96.8% and a reduction of exams with significant artifacts to 1.1%. Hypervascular lesions, in particular HCC detection, hinge on arterial-phase hyperenhancement, making well-timed, artifact-free arterial-phase images a prerequisite for accurate diagnosis. Saline dilution 1:1, slow injection (1ml/s), and automated bolus triggering reduce artifacts and optimize acquisition timing. • There was substantial agreement among the three readers regarding the presence and type of arterial-phase (AP) artifacts, acquisition timing, and lesion visibility. • Impaired AP hypervascular lesion visibility occurred in 17 (3.8%) cases; in eight lesions due to mistiming and in nine lesions due to significant artifacts. • When AP timing was suboptimal, it was too late in 40 exams (3%) and too early in 4 exams (0.2%) of exams.

FI-CEUS: a solution to improve the diagnostic accuracy in MRI LI-RADS-indeterminate (LR-3/4) FLLs at risk for HCC.

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of fusion imaging contrast-enhanced ultrasound (FI-CEUS) of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) LI-RADS-indeterminate (LR-3/4) and conventional ultrasound undetected focal liver lesions (FLLs) in patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Between February 2020 and July 2021, 71 FLLs in 63 patients were registered for diagnostic performance evaluation respectively for ultrasound-guided thermal ablation evaluation in this retrospective study. Diagnostic performance regarding FLLs was compared between FI-CEUS and contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI). For diagnostic performance evaluation, among 71 lesions in 63 patients, the diagnostic efficacy of FI-CEUS with LI-RADS was significantly higher than that of CE-MRI (P < 0.05) in both overall and hierarchical comparison (except for the group with lesion diameter ≥2 cm). For malignant lesions, the proportion of arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) and washout on FI-CEUS was higher than that on CE-MRI (P < 0.05). FI-CEUS has a high value in the precise qualitative diagnosis of small FLLs (<2 cm) of MRI LI-RADS-indeterminate diagnosis (LR-3/4) that are undetected by conventional ultrasound in patients at risk for HCC and can be a good supplementary CE-MRI diagnostic method for thermal ablation evaluation.

A multi-parameter intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma scoring system based on modified contrast-enhanced ultrasound LI-RADS M criteria for differentiating intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma from hepatocellular carcinoma.

To develop a multi-parameter intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) scoring system and compare its diagnostic performance with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) liver imaging reporting and data system M (LR-M) criteria for differentiating ICC from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This retrospective study enrolled 62 high-risk patients with ICCs and 62 high-risk patients with matched HCCs between January 2022 and December 2022 from two institutions. The CEUS LR-M criteria was modified by adjusting the early wash-out onset (within 45 s) and the marked wash-out (within 3 min). Then, a multi-parameter ICC scoring system was established based on clinical features, B-mode ultrasound features, and modified LR-M criteria. We found that elevated CA 19-9 (OR=12.647), lesion boundary (OR=11.601), peripheral rim-like arterial phase hyperenhancement (OR=23.654), early wash-out onset (OR=7.211), and marked wash-out (OR=19.605) were positive predictors of ICC, whereas elevated alpha-fetoprotein (OR=0.078) was a negative predictor. Based on these findings, an ICC scoring system was established. Compared with the modified LR-M and LR-M criteria, the ICC scoring system showed the highest area under the curve (0.911 vs. 0.831 and 0.750, both p<0.05) and specificity (0.935 vs. 0.774 and 0.565, both p<0.05). Moreover, the numbers of HCCs categorized as LR-M decreased from 27 (43.5%) to 14 (22.6%) and 4 (6.5%) using the modified LR-M criteria and ICC scoring system, respectively. The modified LR-M criteria-based multi-parameter ICC scoring system had the highest specificity for diagnosing ICC and reduced the number of HCC cases diagnosed as LR-M category.

The timing phase affected the inconsistency of APHE subtypes of liver observations in patients at risk for HCC on the multi-hepatic arterial phase imaging.

To investigate whether liver observations in patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) display inconsistent arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) subtypes on the multi-hepatic arterial phase imaging (mHAP) and to further investigate factors affecting inconsistent APHE subtype of observations on mHAP imaging. From April 2018 to June 2021, a total of 141 patients at high risk of HCC with 238 liver observations who underwent mHAP MRI acquisitions were consecutively included in this retrospective study. Two experienced radiologists reviewed individual arterial phase imaging independently and assessed the enhancement pattern of each liver observation according to LI-RADS. Another two experienced radiologists identified and recorded the genuine timing phase of each phase independently. When a disagreement appeared between the two radiologists, another expert participated in the discussion to get a final decision. A separate descriptive analysis was used for all observations scored APHE by the radiologists. The Kappa coefficient was used to determine the agreement between the two radiologists. Univariate analysis was performed to investigate the factors affecting inconsistent APHE subtype of liver observations on mHAP imaging. The interobserver agreement was substantial to almost perfect agreement on the assessment of timing phase (κ=0.712-0.887) and evaluation of APHE subtype (κ=0.795-0.901). A total of 87.8% (209/238) of the observations showed consistent nonrim APHE and 10.2% (24/238) of the observations showed consistent rim APHE on mHAP imaging. A total of 2.1% (5/238) of the liver observations were considered inconsistent APHE subtypes, and all progressed nonrim to rim on mHAP imaging. 87.9% (124/141) of the mHAP acquisitions were all arterial phases and 12.1% (17/141) of the mHAP acquisitions obtained both the arterial phase and portal venous phase. Univariate analysis was performed and found that the timing phase of mHAP imaging affected the consistency of APHE subtype of liver observations. When considering the timing phase and excluding the portal venous phase acquired by mHAP imaging, none of the liver observations showed inconsistent APHE subtypes on mHAP imaging. The timing phase which mHAP acquisition contained portal venous phase affected the inconsistency of APHE subtype of liver observations on mHAP imaging. When evaluating the APHE subtype of liver observations, it's necessary to assess the timing of each phase acquired by the mHAP technique at first.

Predicting glypican-3 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma: A comprehensive analysis using combined contrast-enhanced ultrasound and clinical factors.

Glypican-3 (GPC3) has emerged as a significant marker for the diagnosis and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and has garnered considerable attention as an immunotherapeutic target. In this study, we propose a combination of preoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging features and clinical factors to predict the positive expression of GPC3 in HCC patients. We retrospectively included 30 cases of GPC3-negative HCC and 115 cases of GPC3-positive HCC patients who underwent conventional ultrasound and CEUS evaluation. We assessed and compared the clinical characteristics, conventional ultrasound features, and CEUS features between the two groups of HCC patients. Based on the clinical and ultrasound features between the two groups, we developed a binary logistic regression model for predicting GPC3-positive HCC. A total of 145 HCC patients were included in this study. Binary logistic regression analysis showed that AFP > 20 ng/mL (OR = 4.047; 95% CI: 1.467-11.16; p = 0.007), arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) (OR = 12.557; 95% CI: 3.608-43.706; p < 0.001), and asynchronous perfusion (OR = 4.209; 95% CI: 1.206-14.691; p = 0.024) were predictive factors for GPC3-positive HCC. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted to predict GPC3-positive expression. The model combining the three independent predictive factors showed good predictive performance (AUC 0.817, 95% CI: 0.731-0.902, sensitivity: 91.3%, specificity: 60.0%). This combined model demonstrated excellent discriminatory ability to predict GPC3-positive HCC. Preoperative integration of CEUS features and clinical factors can non-invasively and effectively identify GPC3-positive HCC patients, providing valuable assistance in making personalized treatment decisions.

Intrahepatic splenosis: Contrast enhanced ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging findings.

To evaluate the contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CEMRI) features of intrahepatic splenosis (IHS). Five patients (three males and two females, median age, 44 years; range,32-73 years) with seven IHSs were retrieved from the database of our hospital from March 2012 to October 2021. All IHSs were confirmed histologically by surgery. The CEUS and CEMRI characteristics of individual lesion were fully analyzed. All IHS patients were asymptomatic and four out of five patients had history of splenectomy. On CEUS, all IHSs were hyperenhancement in arterial phase. 71.4% (5/7) of IHSs manifested overall filling within few seconds, the other two lesions showed centripetal filling. Subcapsular vascular hyperenhancement and feeding artery was seen in 28.6% (2/7) and 42.9% (3/7) of IHSs, respectively. During portal venous phase, IHSs presented hyperenhancement (2/7) or isoenhancement (5/7). Moreover, rim-like hypoenhanced area was uniquely observed surrounding 85.7% (6/7) of IHSs. In late phase, seven IHSs remained continuous hyper- or isoenhancement. On CEMRI, five IHSs showed mosaic hyperintense in early arterial phase, the other two lesions showed homogeneous hyperintense. In portal venous phase, all IHSs revealed continuous hyper- (71.4%, 5/7) or iso-intense (28.6%, 2/7). During late phase, one IHS (14.3%, 1/7) became hypointense, the other lesions remained hyper- or isointense. Diagnosis of IHS can be based on typical CEUS and CEMRI features in patients with history of splenectomy.

Prediction of macrotrabecular-massive hepatocellular carcinoma by using MR-based models and their prognostic implications.

To evaluate the efficacy of MRI-based radiomics and clinical models in predicting MTM-HCC. Additionally, to investigate the ability of the radiomics model designed for MTM-HCC identification in predicting disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with HCC. A total of 336 patients who underwent oncological resection for HCC between June 2007 and March 2021 were included. 127 patients in Cohort1 were used for MTM-HCC identification, and 209 patients in Cohort2 for prognostic analyses. Radiomics analysis was performed using volumes of interest of HCC delineated on pre-operative MRI images. Radiomics and clinical models were developed using Random Forest algorithm in Cohort1 and a radiomics probability (RP) of MTM-HCC was obtained from the radiomics model. Based on the RP, patients in Cohort2 were divided into a RAD-MTM-HCC (RAD-M) group and a RAD-non-MTM-HCC (RAD-nM) group. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were employed to identify the independent predictors for DFS of patients in Cohort2. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to compare the DFS between different groups pf patients based on the predictors. The radiomics model for identifying MTM-HCC showed AUCs of 0.916 (95% CI: 0.858-0.960) and 0.833 (95% CI: 0.675-0.935), and the clinical model showed AUCs of 0.760 (95% CI: 0.669-0.836) and 0.704 (95% CI: 0.532-0.843) in the respective training and validation sets. Furthermore, the radiomics biomarker RP, portal or hepatic vein tumor thrombus, irregular rim-like arterial phase hyperenhancement (IRE) and AFP were independent predictors of DFS in patients with HCC. The DFS of RAD-nM group was significantly higher than that of the RAD-M group (p < .001). MR-based clinical and radiomic models have the potential to accurately diagnose MTM-HCC. Moreover, the radiomics signature designed to identify MTM-HCC also can be used to predict prognosis in patients with HCC, realizing the diagnostic and prognostic aims at the same time.