Meaningful interactions with works of art are often absent from education. Across the country, art museums are intent on changing this situation. But to incorporate art viewing1 into an educational milieu that does not value art, art museum educators are constantly forced to justify the educational value of their programs. One common argument to substantiate the worth of art viewing is that it promotes critical thinking. In fact, several museums across the United States assert that the goal of their education programs is precisely to foster critical thinking in students.2 These assertions are aligned with a growing body of research that proves that encounters with works of art can help develop skills associated with critical thinking.3 According to Willingham, critical thinking consists of “seeing both sides of an issue, being open to new evidence that disconfirms your ideas, reasoning dispassionately, demanding that claims be backed by evidence, [and] deducing and inferring conclusions from available facts.” In sync with this definition,4 the research shows that guided dialogues about art can promote skills, including observation, questioning, association, inference, evidential reasoning, and openness to multiple perspectives. The link between certain art viewing programs and the development of particular critical thinking skills is thus unquestionable. This said, it is one thing to recognize this link and quite another to say that art viewing matters because it fosters critical thinking skills. In this essay I will critique the notion that the purpose and contribution of art museum education is to develop discrete critical thinking skills in students. I will articulate several problems inherent to this idea and conclude by inviting museum educators to embrace a broader vision of their work.