You have accessJournal of UrologyProstate Cancer: Detection & Screening III1 Apr 2016MP21-17 STANDARD PROSTATE BIOPSY VS NEW DIAGNOSTIC PATH WITH MRI AND FUSION BIOPSY: PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY. Francesco Porpiglia, Fabrizio Mele, Matteo Manfredi, Riccardo Bertolo, Daniele Amparore, Enrico Checcucci, Roberta Aimar, Marco Cossu, Enrico Bollito, Filippo Russo, Dario Gned, Agostino De Pascale, Stefano Cirillo, and Cristian Fiori Francesco PorpigliaFrancesco Porpiglia More articles by this author , Fabrizio MeleFabrizio Mele More articles by this author , Matteo ManfrediMatteo Manfredi More articles by this author , Riccardo BertoloRiccardo Bertolo More articles by this author , Daniele AmparoreDaniele Amparore More articles by this author , Enrico CheccucciEnrico Checcucci More articles by this author , Roberta AimarRoberta Aimar More articles by this author , Marco CossuMarco Cossu More articles by this author , Enrico BollitoEnrico Bollito More articles by this author , Filippo RussoFilippo Russo More articles by this author , Dario GnedDario Gned More articles by this author , Agostino De PascaleAgostino De Pascale More articles by this author , Stefano CirilloStefano Cirillo More articles by this author , and Cristian FioriCristian Fiori More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.651AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Nowadays, in the suspicion of prostate cancer (PCa), the patient undergoes a prostate biopsy with multiple samples using a standardized template (standard biopsy - SB). Many of these samples are unnecessary and reveal “indolent” tumors. With the introduction of multiparametric prostate MRI can be performed targeted biopsies with a software capable of co-record MRI and TRUS (fusion biopsy - FB), with the aim of reducing the number of biopsy samples and increasing performance. The primary objective of this randomized, prospective, two-arm, study was to evaluate the efficacy of a new diagnostic path based on MRI and on FB, comparing to diagnostic standard. METHODS After approval of the local Ethics Committee, all naïve patients suspected for prostate cancer (PSA <15 ng/ml and negative DRE) were randomized into 2 groups using a computer-generated random allocation in a 1:1 ratio: Arm A (undergoing MRI) and arm B (not undergo MRI). The MRI study consisted of T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging, all lesions were classified according to PIRADS system. The patients were then biopsied as follows: - Arm A with positive mp-MRI (PIRADS score> 3): MRI/TRUS fusion software-based targeted biopsy using the Biojet® system (D&K Technologies), carrying out at least 3 samples for suspected lesion; - Arm A with negative mp-MRI or lesion of low suspicion (PIRADS score <3) and arm B: transrectal TRUS-guided SB with 12 samples. PCa were considered clinically significant (CS) according to START consortium definition (for FB) and Epstein criteria (for SB). RESULTS During the period 11/2014 – 09/2015 were enrolled 122 patients. Median age was 64 (49-75) years, mean PSA was 6.9 (+ 3.6) ng/ml. The demographic characteristics of patients in both arms and in the subgroups in arm A were comparable. Table 1 shows the preliminary results. CONCLUSIONS In our study, the detection rate of FB was significantly higher than SB with a significantly lower mean number of samples. These results are even more significant considering CS PCa. In patients in arm A submitted to SB, the probability of finding a PCa was minimal and none CS PCa was revealed. Although it is necessary to extend the series, this new diagnostic path based on MRI and FB technique seems to be safer and more effective than the standard. © 2016FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 195Issue 4SApril 2016Page: e251 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2016MetricsAuthor Information Francesco Porpiglia More articles by this author Fabrizio Mele More articles by this author Matteo Manfredi More articles by this author Riccardo Bertolo More articles by this author Daniele Amparore More articles by this author Enrico Checcucci More articles by this author Roberta Aimar More articles by this author Marco Cossu More articles by this author Enrico Bollito More articles by this author Filippo Russo More articles by this author Dario Gned More articles by this author Agostino De Pascale More articles by this author Stefano Cirillo More articles by this author Cristian Fiori More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract