Argument-Driven Inquiry Model Research Articles

Efektivitas Modul Pencemaran Sampah dengan Model Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa Biologi

Critical thinking skills are a crucial aspect of the 21st century, playing a fundamental role in various areas of life, yet they are still not optimally developed in classrooms. This research aims to develop critical thinking skills through the Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) module for biology students. This study uses a nonrandomized control-group pretest-posttest design experiment involving three classes as the experimental group, positive control, and negative control. This research sample consisted of 67 biology students from Universitas Negeri Malang across three classes. Data collection techniques employed pretest and posttest questions on critical thinking skills. Data analysis was performed using ANCOVA. The results of the ANCOVA test on the biology students' critical thinking revealed a significance of learning at 0.036 (less than 0.05), thus it can be concluded that the research hypothesis is accepted, indicating a difference in critical thinking between students using the ADI module, ADI model, and PowerPoint. The ADI module proved effective in enhancing the critical thinking skills of biology students, with significantly higher posttest results compared to other learning models. The development of this module also included the integration of interactive videos about the conditions of garbage mountains and leachate water pollution at the Supit Urang Malang landfill, providing a more realistic context for the students

Effectiveness of Science E-Module Using Argument-Driven Inquiry Models to Improve Students' Generic Science, Critical Thinking and Scientific Argumentation Abilities

This research aims to determine the effectiveness of e-module teaching materials with the Argument-Driven Inquiry model to improve students' generic science, critical thinking and scientific argumentation abilities. The development model design used is 4D which consists of the define, design, develop and disseminate stages. The e-module which was declared valid was then carried out on a limited scale trial on 27 students. Analysis of increasing generic skills in science, critical thinking and scientific argumentation using the n-Gain (g) test. The research results show that there is an increase in ability after the e-module is implemented into learning. The n-Gain value for generic science abilities is 68.70, critical thinking 62.25 and scientific argumentation 67.11. The n-Gain value for each variable is in the medium category so that the Argument-Driven Inquiry based science e-module is quite effective for use in science learning

Penerapan Model Adi (Argument Driven Inquiry) Berbasis Argumentasi Toulmin Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik SMA

Efforts that can be made to facilitate the improvement of students' critical thinking skills are to apply the ADI (Argument Driven Inquiry) learning model. It is a learning model that gives students opportunity to learn in reflective scientific inquiry so they can develop argumentation skills and critical thinking. The purpose of this study was to obtain data on (1) implementation of ADI model on sound wave material, (2) improvement students' critical thinking skills after applying ADI model based on Toulmin's argumentation. The type of research is true experiments with pre-test-post-test control group research design. Data collection was carried out using observation, tests and questionnaires. The results showed that learning physics using ADI model could be carried out very well with percentage score of 94,23%. The results of pre-test and post-test data analysis shows that the increase of critical thinking skills of experimental class students is in medium category and control class is in low category. The results of student response questionnaire data analysis showed that stages of ADI model were implemented well in class with percentage score of 84,16%. This shows that ADI model can be used to improve students' critical thinking skills.

Analysis of the Implementation of Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) in Students' Argumentation Skills

This study uses a literary study method using a type of qualitative research which aims to describe a suitable learning model to improve students' argumentation skills, namely the Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) model because it requires students to learn independently to understand material concepts and practice directly. In the ADI model there is a syntax that the teacher can apply to students during science learning so that students are able to convey their arguments correctly and correctly based on existing material concepts. Because to face the challenges of 21st century education, skills such as thinking skills, analytical skills, and creativity skills are needed. Of the 56 articles found with similar topics, 13 were selected to obtain 13 articles which were analyzed to obtain the result that the existence of the Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) model was able to improve students' argumentation abilities in the sense of students' ability to think critically in facing a problem or solving a problem, increasing students' understanding skills to the concept of science material presented by the teacher, and improve students' ability to practice directly in the environment so that they better understand events around them so as to be able to provide solutions in an argumentative manner related to theoretical science.

Pengaruh Model Argument Driven Inquiry terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Berdasarkan Perbedaan Gaya Belajar Siswa SMP pada Materi Sistem Ekskresi

This study aims to determine the effect of the Argument Driven Inquiry learning model on higher-order thinking skills based on the learning style of VIII grade junior high school students on the excretory system material. This type of research uses a quasi-experimental design, with a non-equivalent control group design. The samples of this study were students of class VIII F as the experimental class, and class VIII D as the control class at SMP Negeri 6 Sukabumi City. The instrument used is in the form of high-level thinking ability test questions or questionnaires in the form of multiple choice questions as many as 27 questions. The second instrument is using a student response questionnaire to learning using the Argument Driven Inquiry model which consists of 10 questions, and the third instrument is a student learning style questionnaire consisting of 33 statements. Based on the results of the average post-test scores in the experimental class and control class obtained 82.29 and 67.48. Based on the results of the independent sample t-test of the Argument Driven Inquiry learning model, the value of Sig. 0.000, then there is a significant effect of the Argument Driven Inquiry learning model on the students' higher-order thinking skills in junior high school.

THE ARGUMENT-DRIVEN INQUIRY TRAINING FOR SCIENCE TEACHERS IN PALANGKA RAYA CITY

Integrating laboratory activities with learning activities is a separate dynamic for science teachers, because learning science (Chemistry, Physics, and Biology) will be "bland" because students do not get valuable practical experience. Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) is a learning model in which teachers can change conventional laboratory learning into integrated laboratory learning. This learning combines laboratory activities with other learning activities such as reading, lectures, and discussions. The purpose of this service is to introduce and train teachers in designing ADI-based learning. The Service Method is carried out in three stages, namely: 1) Preparatory Stage; 2) Implementation Stage; and 3) Evaluation Stage. The results achieved after participating in this workshop were being able to design learning based on the ADI Model. In addition, this activity received a positive response (78%) towards the development of science learning activities at the senior high school level

Student conceptual and epistemic quality improvement argumenation with scaffolding on argument-driven inquiry

This study is aimed at comparing the quality of students’ argumentation based on conceptual and epistemic aspects between learnings that implement argument-driven inquiry (ADI) and argument-driven inquiry with scaffolding (ADIS) models. The data were collected through dialogic argumentation observation sheets for the students and audio-visual recordings and were analyzed qualitatively. The study invoved 67 participants in the ADI group and 81 participants in the ADIS group. The quality of student argument with the ADI model differed significantly from the ADIS model. Results show that the students in the ADIS class were are better at providing sufficient data to support claims and coherent causal explanations to explain a certain phenomenon, and at organizing accurate rhetorical references when expressing data.

Exploring the effect of argument-driven inquiry on pre-service science teachers’ achievement, science process, and argumentation skills and their views on the ADI model

This study utilized a mixed-methods design to examine the effectiveness of the argument-driven inquiry (ADI) model. The participants were 28 pre-service science teachers (PSTs), and data were collected on their achievement, science process skills, and argumentation levels before and after the treatment. A focus group interview was conducted to investigate their views on the model. The ADI model had a positive impact on PSTs’ science process skills, argumentation levels, as well as knowledge of the science content under the activities. Moreover, PSTs held a positive attitude towards using the ADI model in their classes and stressed it provides good retention.

The Effect of e-Worksheets in Eco-Friendly Technology Oriented with Argument-Driven Inquiry Model to Improve Students Argumentation Skills

This study aims to describe the effect of implementing e-worksheets on environmentally friendly technology materials with the Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) model in improving students' argumentation skills. This study involved 60 grade IX students in a junior high school in South Lampung, Lampung province. The research design used was a non-equivalent pretest-posttest control group design with an experimental class of 30 students and a control class of 30 students. Students in the experimental class get learning assisted by e-worksheet with the ADI model, while students in the control class are taught using the Problem Based Learning (PBL) model. The results showed that students who were taught using the e-worksheets with the ADI model had a higher N-gain (g=0.61 with medium criteria) than students taught using the PBL model (g=0.17 with low criteria). Furthermore, the effectiveness of learning environmentally friendly technology using the ADI model shows a high category (ES=0.84). This shows that the e-worksheet material on environmentally friendly technology using the ADI model was effective in improving students' argumentation skills. Keywords: e-worksheet, argumentation skills, argument-driven inquiry. Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan pengaruh penerapan e-LKPD materi teknologi ramah lingkungan dengan model Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) dalam meningkatkan keterampilan argumentasi siswa. Penelitian ini melibatkan 60 siswa kelas IX disebuah SMP Negeri di Lampung Selatan, provinsi Lampung. Desain penelitian yang digunakan adalah non-equivalent pretest-posttest control group design dengan kelas eksperimen sebanyak 30 siswa dan kelas kontrol sebanyak 30 siswa. Siswa pada kelas eksperimen mendapatkan pembelajaran dengan berbantuan e-LKPD dengan model ADI, sedangkan siswa pada kelas kontrol diajar menggunakan model Problem Based Learning (PBL). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa siswa yang diajar menggunakan e-LKPD dengan model ADI memiliki N-gain (g=0,61 kriteria sedang) yang lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan siswa yang diajarkan dengan model PBL (g=0,17 kriteria rendah). Selanjutnya, efektivitas pembelajaran teknologi ramah lingkungan dengan menggunakan model ADI menunjukkan kategori tinggi (ES=0,84). Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa e-LKPD materi teknologi ramah lingkungan dengan menggunakan model ADI efektif untuk meningkatkan keterampilan argumentasi siswa. Kata kunci: e-LKPD, keterampilan argumentasi, argument-driven inquiry. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v23i2.pp744-753

DEVELOPMENT OF STUDENT WORKSHEETS TOPIC BASED ON ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION MATERIALS USING THE ARGUMENT-DRIVEN INQURY (ADI) MODEL FOR SEVENTH GRADE OF JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS


 This research was conducted to determine the validity and practicality of the worksheets teaching materials. Based on the analysis of the activities in science learning, it was found that students were still less active in the learning process and lacked confidence in giving opinions during the ongoing learning process. One attempt which can be done to address this problem is by developing students' worksheet which can encourage students to be more active in learning. One approach we can use to develop students worksheet is using the Argument-Driven Inquiry Model, which emphasize on students' confidence in presenting their own argument in class. This development research employed three stages of the 4-D model, which consists of four stages namely define, design, develop and disseminate, Disseminate stage could not be done due to several considerations related to time constraint and expenses. The research instrument used were a validity and practicality questionnaire. This students worksheet was validated by 3 validators and tested for practicality on 5 grade VII students. The results showed that the developed students worksheet compiled and developed was very valid with a score of 80.02% and practicality by teachers of 90.29 and 90.88 at the category of very high. Therefore, this student worksheet can be implemented in learning. However, we would like to recommend for further research with regard to the Argument-Driven Inquiry so that the research is more valid.

Effectiveness of argument-driven inquiry (ADI) on students’ concept mastery and argumentation skills in reproductive system

This study aims to determine the effect of the Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) learning model application on the concepts mastery and argumentation skills of high school students on reproductive system material. The research method used quasi-experimental and non-equivalent control group design. The sample of this research were second-grade high school MIPA students in one of the public high schools in Bandung, which consists of 30 students in the experimental class and 33 students in the control class. The sample was taken by using the purposive sampling technique. The instruments used consisted of a concept mastery test in the form of multiple choices, an argumentation ability test in the form of an essay, and questionnaire of students’ responses to the ADI model. The results showed that the application of the ADI learning model significantly affected the students' concepts mastery on reproductive system material in the experimental class compared to the control class, especially in the cognitive aspects of C3 (applying). The results also show that the application of the ADI learning model significantly affects the ability of argumentation, especially on the warrant component. Student response data shows that students respond very well to the application of the ADI learning model. Therefore, the ADI learning model is recommended for biology teachers to improve students’ concepts mastery mastery and argumentation skills in other biological materials.

Design and Validation of Science Student Worksheet based on Argument Driven Inquiry to Improve Argumentation Skills for Junior High School Students

The survey results on teachers and students in six regencies/cities in Lampung Province showed that in science learning, teachers have not optimized the argumentative skills of students. Thus, this study aimed to develop and validate science worksheets oriented to the argumentative skills of students. This study used a 4D-study design with Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) learning model. A small-scale trial was conducted on 20 IX-graders at SMP 9 Krui Pesisir Barat. The large-scale trial was conducted on 50 IX-graders at SMP 9 Krui Pesisir Barat by purposive sampling with one experimental class and one control class. The control class used a worksheet from a particular publisher, and the experimental class used the developed worksheet. Based on the results, the ADI model worksheet can be declared valid in terms of content, construction, and language with an average of 92.3% with very high criteria. The practicality of the ADI worksheet model can be seen from the implementation of learning, student responses, and teacher responses had an average of 89.24% with very high criteria. The effectiveness of the ADI model worksheet can be seen from the ability to work on argumentation skills test questions, showing that the control class N-gain was 0.27 with low criteria and the experimental class was 0.57 with medium criteria. The effect size (SE) of 0.64 showed that the developed science worksheet was effective in developing argumentative skills of students with medium criteria

Argument-Driven Inquiry Learning Model: A Systematic Review

The learning approach is an important component of education. ADI learning model allows learners to argue actively based on the surrounding observable phenomena in the laboratory. This research aims to review national diversities that represent or contribute to studies by applying the ADI learning model and the research type varieties and characteristics and stages of Argument-Driven Inquiry learning model applied by other researchers; research subjects, the applied content materials for investigation, and the impact of Argument-Driven Inquiry learning model. This research is a systematic literature review (SLR) with published article databases from Scopus, ERIC, and Google Scholar. The applied keywords were "Argument-Driven Inquiry" and "Science Education." The findings showed twenty-three articles were in line with the categories. Then, the analysis and classification could be done for each article. The ADI learning model implementation had been frequently found to improve learners' scientific argumentative skills rather than analytical skills or critical thinking skills. The applied content materials were mostly chemical materials, biology, and rarely found in physics. Most applied research types from the articles were quasi-experimental research. The implication of this research is to provide insight for further reviewing the argument-driven inquiry model (ADI) to improve science learning quality.

Examining science teachers' enactment of argument-driven inquiry (ADI) instructional model

ABSTRACT This paper examines three in-service science teachers’ use of argument-driven inquiry (ADI) instructional model in an urban school district. We explore the basis for teachers’ adaptation of the ADI model. The data were collected through teacher interviews and classroom observations from three science teachers. Data analysis indicated that three teachers utilised the ADI model in different ways; their implementation is aligned with the intentions of the ADI model or science teachers adapted or omitted the phases of the ADI. The teachers’ practices were influenced by their personal beliefs including beliefs about teaching and learning science and students’ ability and contextual factors such as district and standards, curriculum, and testing. The study provides suggestions about science teacher education and the development of new curriculum materials.

The effect of argument-driven inquiry on chemistry reaction-rates to enhance pre-service chemistry teachers critical thinking skills

This research aims to determine the effect of using the Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) learning model on the critical thinking skills of pre-service chemistry teachers on the topic of reaction rate. The study participants comprised of 20 pre-service chemistry teachers enrolled in a School Chemistry 1 unit. This research uses quasi experiment with one group pretest-posttest design method. The data collected through two-tier multiple choices test which refers to the indicator of critical thinking skills by Ennis before and after learning with Argument-Driven Inquiry model. Pretest and posttest result data were analyzed using Wilcoxon’s nonparametric statistical test. The results showed that there was an influence of the application of the Argument Driven Inquiry learning model to the critical thinking skills of students as indicated by the sig value. of 0.000 at a 95% confidence level. based on these results, it can be concluded that the implementation of Argument Driven Inquiry model effective to improve the critical thinking skill of pre-service chemistry teachers. Critical thinking skills in each sub-indicator were analyzed using normalized gain and the results obtained n-gain values for the indicator determine an action 0.73 (high), focus questions: 0.69 (medium), analyze arguments: 0.56 (medium) and to make deductions and consider the results of deductions: 0.40 (medium). These N-gain results indicate that ADI learning can improve pre-service chemistry teachers’ critical thinking skills on these four indicators.

Internalization of Religious Values Using the Argument-Driven Inquiry Model to Improve Critical Thinking Skills during the COVID-19 Pandemic

This research aimed to describe students’ activities, the improvement differences of students' critical thinking skills, and explain students' responses toward the internalization of religious values using the Argument-Driven Inquiry model on reproductive system material at eleventh-grade students of MAN 1 Kuningan. The method used in this research was the quantitative method with the experimental pretest-posttest control group design. This research population was all eleventh-grade students of MAN 1 Kuningan, which consisted of eight classes, five science classes, and three social studies classes. The research sample was taken using a random sampling technique. This research sample was class XI IPA 1 as the experimental class (35 students) and XI IPA 3 as the control class (34 students). The data collection techniques employed were observation, tests, and questionnaires. The data was analyzed using SPSS v.25 software. The results obtained showed that the highest learning activity was at the data collection stage. There was an improvement in students’ critical thinking skills in the experimental class and the control class. The average N-Gain of the experimental class was 0.69, and the control class was 0.33. The sig statistical test results were 0.000 0.655, meaning that H0 was rejected and Ha was accepted. Thus, there was a significant improvement in students' critical thinking skills between the experimental and control classes.

Validity and Effectiveness of Argument-Driven Inquiry Model With Contextual Approaches to Improve Critical Thinking Skills in Science Learning

This study aimed to determine the effectiveness and validity of a teaching document using Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) model with a Contextual Approach to improve students' critical thinking skills in science learning. This type of research was research and development (R&D) that refers to the 4D model. Data collected by the validation sheets, student response sheet, and critical thinking skills test. They were analyzed by using t-test and N-gain. The present research was applied in lower secondary at SMP Negeri 1 Bluto with trial design of One-Group Pretest-Posttest Design. The results of the data analysis show that (1) the learning materials was valid in terms of the results of the validity of the materials with the score of 3.57; (2) learning materials was effective in terms of: (a) the students' responses were categorized as very good with results of 83.2%, (b) students' critical thinking skill increased with an average value of N-gain in grade eight A of 0.74 and 0.75 for grade eight B with a high category. Based on the results of statistical analysis using the t test, the probability value (sig) was 0,000 in the two classes. This means that the significance value was less than 0.05 which means there was a significant difference between the pre-test and post-test results. In conclusion, Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) model with a Contextual Approach is proven to be feasible and effective for improving critical thinking skills.

Pengembangan Buku Penuntun Praktikum Sistem Peredaran Darah Manusia dengan Model Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI)

This study aims to produce a practical guidebook of human circulatory system with Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) model for students at junior high schools. The design of this research was R&D with 4-D model including define, design, develop, and disseminate. However, this research was only up to the develop step. The result of this study is in form of a practical guidebook of human circulatory system and using language that is easily understood and in accordance with EYD. Then, the practical worksheet consists of student identities, title of practices, basic theories, objectives, research questions, tools, materials, work steps, argumentation schemes, argumentation sessions, and reports. Next, the results of validation of experts and practitioners as well as the results of the readability test of the students obtain "Excellent" category. Moreover, the results of the implemented tests of all practices obtain "Almost All Activities Implemented" category. As a result, the practical guidebook of the human circulatory system with ADI model is valid and practical.

The Validity of Student Worksheets Based on Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) in Cell Structure and Plant Tissue Material to Train Critical Thinking Skill for Senior High School Students

Critical thinking skills is one of the 21st century competencies that students need to have in education. Therefore, teaching materials must be developed in learning process, one of them is student worksheets with Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) based. Argument-Driven Inquiry is an inquiry learning model that effective to improving the critical thinking skill students by argumentation skill. One of the materials apropriated with ADI model is the structure plant of cells and plant tissue. This study aimed to describe the validity and produce worksheets based on Argument-Driven Inquiry in structure of plant cells and plant tissue material to train critical thinking skill for senior high school students. The method used in this research is ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation) development model. The phase carried out only reached the stage of student worksheets development. Student worksheets development carried out in Biology Department, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Surabaya State University. The validity of student worksheets obtained from the validators using the validation sheet. The results showed that the worksheets was declaring to be very valid with an average score of 3.74. Based on the data obtained, it can be concluded that student worksheets developed declared feasible based on its validity and could be used in the learning process.
 Keywords: Student worksheets, validity, critical thinking skills, Argument-driven Inquiry (ADI), structure of cells and plant tissue

Science teachers’ use of argumentation instructional model: linking PCK of argumentation, epistemological beliefs, and practice

ABSTRACT This study aimed to explore the relationship between science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) of argumentation, epistemological beliefs, and classroom practices. Participants were three urban science teachers who were selected among 12 teachers from a professional development (PD) program focusing on Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) instructional model. These three teachers completed PCK of argumentation assessments; they were observed while implementing the argumentation investigations and reflected on and interviewed about their teaching experiences after each enactment and at the end of the study. The findings illustrate that these teachers experience positive shifts in their PCK of argumentation; a teacher with evaluativist epistemological beliefs has high-quality PCK of argumentation, which is reflected in her teaching practices aligning with the expectations of the ADI model. However, if teachers’ epistemology included multiplist elements, they modify the ADI investigations even though they have improved their PCK of argumentation. This finding addresses how teachers’ epistemological beliefs are connected to their teaching actions. The results show that different aspects of epistemological beliefs and PCK of argumentation are linked to teachers’ use of argumentation investigations. The paper discusses the implications for science education and future research.