You have accessJournal of UrologyInfertility: Basic Research, Physiology & Pathophysiology1 Apr 2014MP66-11 NUCLEOSOME RETENTION IN SPERM-CHROMATIN: A RANDOM PROCESS OR AN ORGANIZED EVENT WITH A BIOLOGICAL FUNCTION? Birgit Samans, Yang Yang, Stefan Krebs, Helmut Blum, Klaus Steger, Wolfgang Weidner, Temuujin Dansranjavin, and Undraga Schagdarsurengin Birgit SamansBirgit Samans More articles by this author , Yang YangYang Yang More articles by this author , Stefan KrebsStefan Krebs More articles by this author , Helmut BlumHelmut Blum More articles by this author , Klaus StegerKlaus Steger More articles by this author , Wolfgang WeidnerWolfgang Weidner More articles by this author , Temuujin DansranjavinTemuujin Dansranjavin More articles by this author , and Undraga SchagdarsurenginUndraga Schagdarsurengin More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.02.2058AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES The hallmark of the last step of spermatogenesis, spermiogenesis, is the condensation of paternal chromatin in order to generate a fertile sperm with a protected and transportable DNA. This is achieved by exchange of nucleosomes by small arginine-rich protamines. Interestingly, depending on mammal species a part of nucleosomes (e.g. 1% in mouse and 10-15% in human) remain unchanged. In this study we aimed to solve the meaning of nucleosome retention in sperm by analyzing nucleosome-binding sites in a genome-wide manner. METHODS Ten million sperm cells from a fertile donor were diluted in PBS and incubated with Lysolecithin. After DTT treatment, freed chromatin was digested with microccal nuclease. To separate nucleosomal (soluble) and protamine fractions (insoluble) freed chromatin was centrifuged. DNA isolated from nucleosomal fraction was separated on an agarose gel and the 146 bp mono-nucleosomal DNA was cutted out and purified. High throughput sequencing was performed using Genome Analyzer IIx (Illumina). Sequencing reads were aligned to the precompiled hg19 genome. All putative nucleosome-binding sites were analyzed considering coding and non-coding DNA (intergenic and intron), functional elements (promoter, 5’-UTR, 3’-UTR) and, moreover, repetitive DNA occurrence. RESULTS We found that in human sperm 5% of the genome, but not 10-15% as supposed before, is still bound to nucleosomes. Remarkably, sperm-nucleosomes remain mainly in centromere repeats, but also frequently in long and short interspersed nuclear elements (LINEs, SINEs). The majority of retained nucleosomes could be localized within non-coding intergenic and intron sequences. Analyzing gene regions we revealed that coding exons as well as transcriptional start and end sites are rather nucleosome-depleted. Gene promoters showed also a tendency of nucleosome-depletion, except some genes coding for cell-cell adhesion factors and calcium ion regulators. The main part of detected intragenic nucleosomes was scattered in gene bodies, interestingly often in genes coding for RNA- and protein-processing, and cell-cell adhesion factors. CONCLUSIONS Our results show that nucleosome-retention in sperm can be associated to certain genome regions and repetitive sequences. We suppose that the impact of sperm-nucleosomes is closely associated to post-fertilization centromere function but also to activity of retrotransposons. © 2014FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 191Issue 4SApril 2014Page: e744 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2014MetricsAuthor Information Birgit Samans More articles by this author Yang Yang More articles by this author Stefan Krebs More articles by this author Helmut Blum More articles by this author Klaus Steger More articles by this author Wolfgang Weidner More articles by this author Temuujin Dansranjavin More articles by this author Undraga Schagdarsurengin More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...