Anyone who knows a little about the Speeton sections can soon pick up a fairly representative series of their Belemnites, but not of their Ammonites; that demands much time and luck. Such at least has been my experience, for notwithstanding the exceptional opportunities for constant search afforded by several years’ residence almost on the spot, I have not yet found some species, only poor examples of others, and —proof of the exhaustive character of Prof. Pavlow’s and Mr. Lamplugh’s museum and field researches—hardly any that cannot be identified from the descriptions and figures in their “Argiles de Speeton,”[*][1] to which work I am further indebted for the nomenclature and the classification of the series[†][2] used in the following slight sketch. The Ammonites at Speeton are not only in much worse condition than the Belemnites, but also far fewer, except in the Kimeridge where their crushed remains are legion, while in a considerable part of the upper deposits there are apparently none. Of the 43 species described or figured in the “Argiles de Speeton,”[‡][3] all but four, representing as many genera, are included in Hoplites and Olcostephanus, the latter being divided by Prof. Pavlow into six groups, or sub-genera, Virgitates, Craspedites, Polyptichites, Holcodiscus, Astieria, Simbirskites. The Hoplites occupy the lower part of the upper Kimeridge, the extreme top of “the Lateralis zone” D, the lower part of “the Jaculum zone” C, the top of “the Brunsvicensis zone” B, and “the Olcostephani, occur in the upper Kimeridge, the Coprolite Bed E, ... [1]: #fn-1 [2]: #fn-2 [3]: #fn-3
Read full abstract