The angiographic appearance of a typical hypernephroma is characteristic. However, while hypernephromas with atypical vascularity, as well as other malignant and benign renal tumors containing only a few abnormal vessels, are easily differentiated from renal cysts, they are sometimes confused with so-called pseudotumors (1). In a pseudotumor, normal renal parenchyma shows localized contrast material staining which might be mistaken for a true tumor (6, 10, 14). Most frequently, normal variations such as hypertrophy of the renal parenchyma and lobulation of the kidneys or scar formation in the vicinity of normally functioning parenchyma result in this misleading appearance. Recently, we encountered a case in which a lesion diagnosed angiographically as an atypical renal tumor was found at surgery to be a fresh renal infarct. Case Report A 55-year-old Caucasian male with a 20-pound weight loss during the previous year complained of right upper quadrant pain. At physical examination, the only abnormal finding was slight hepatomegaly. A radioisotope liver scan was compatible with multiple metastases throughout the liver. An attempt to perform selective celiac axis arteriography in order to confirm the findings of the liver scan was unsuccessful, so contrast material was injected into the abdominal aorta. The angiogram showed a normal celiac axis and no evidence for significant hepatomegaly or for hepatic masses. It did, however, raise the question of a tumor stain in the midportion of the right kidney, and twenty-four hours later selective right renal arteriography was performed. This study showed a mass in the midportion of the right kidney which had displaced several intrarenal branches of the renal artery. Irregular small vessels in the periphery of the lesion were interpreted as tumor vessels. During the parenchymal phase, there was prolonged diffuse contrast material retention in this mass (Fig. 1). These findings were thought to represent an atypical tumor which had possibly produced liver metastases. At laparotomy, a radical right nephrectomy was performed. There was no evidence of liver metastases. Macroscopic and microscopic examination of the kidney showed a wedge-shape area of ischemic coagulation necrosis in its midportion in exactly the same area as had been stained with contrast material on the angiogram (Fig. 2). Slight fibroblastic proliferation at the margin of the infarct was noted. It was estimated that the infarct had occurred approximately two to six days prior to the aortography. No gross thrombi or arteriosclerotic changes were noted in the renal arteries. Histologically, the medium-size arteries showed arteriosclerotic thickening with slight-to-moderate intimal proliferation. A marginally organizing thromboembolus was observed within a hilar artery. Discussion This is a case of a recent renal infarct which angiographically resembled a renal tumor.