Through which registers does criticality operate in architecture and how can its political, social, and aesthetic concerns be reconciled? Such questions were at the centre of the post-1968 crisis of criticality and have resurfaced in recent debates under the banner of the “post-critical”. This paper contributes to the historicising of this debate through the unpacking of Peter Wilson's The Fire: 2, a 1974 student project he developed at the Architectural Association (AA) in London. The Fire: 2 is an imaginary scenario for a post-disaster London and comprises of a monumental, enclosed ensemble of seven 1 km × 1 km squares connected through the River Thames. Through Wilson's project, this article challenges an overly dismissive evaluation of (all) postmodern architectural drawings as mere stylistic reverie. Historically, it contributes to a deeper understanding of the convergences and tensions between politics and aesthetics, and between disciplinary critique and an engagement with the world “out there”, at the dawn of architectural postmodernism. The Fire: 2 is particularly instructive since it is not only a product of the AA, which played a pivotal role in the formation of the critical discourse of the 1970s and 1980s, it is also the product of a student who, immersed in a politically charged AA, set out to craft his own architectural voice in both political and aesthetic terms. In order to access the resultant ambivalent criticality, I will not explain the project through unproductive pairs such as opposition–appeasement, politics–aesthetics, or withdrawal–engagement. Instead, I unpack the different registers of critical engagement that are at work in the drawings. Because Wilson deploys the drawings as a vehicle for both personal, artistic expression and critical engagement, The Fire: 2 offers a unique resource for revisiting this recent history.