Archaeal Chromatin Research Articles

The chromatin landscape of the euryarchaeon Haloferax volcanii

BackgroundArchaea, together with Bacteria, represent the two main divisions of life on Earth, with many of the defining characteristics of the more complex eukaryotes tracing their origin to evolutionary innovations first made in their archaeal ancestors. One of the most notable such features is nucleosomal chromatin, although archaeal histones and chromatin differ significantly from those of eukaryotes, not all archaea possess histones and it is not clear if histones are a main packaging component for all that do. Despite increased interest in archaeal chromatin in recent years, its properties have been little studied using genomic tools.ResultsHere, we adapt the ATAC-seq assay to archaea and use it to map the accessible landscape of the genome of the euryarchaeote Haloferax volcanii. We integrate the resulting datasets with genome-wide maps of active transcription and single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) and find that while H. volcanii promoters exist in a preferentially accessible state, unlike most eukaryotes, modulation of transcriptional activity is not associated with changes in promoter accessibility. Applying orthogonal single-molecule footprinting methods, we quantify the absolute levels of physical protection of H. volcanii and find that Haloferax chromatin is similarly or only slightly more accessible, in aggregate, than that of eukaryotes. We also evaluate the degree of coordination of transcription within archaeal operons and make the unexpected observation that some CRISPR arrays are associated with highly prevalent ssDNA structures.ConclusionsOur results provide the first comprehensive maps of chromatin accessibility and active transcription in Haloferax across conditions and thus a foundation for future functional studies of archaeal chromatin.

Essentiality of core hydrophobicity to the structure and function of archaeal chromatin protein Cren7

Studies on the structure–function relationship of protein greatly help to understand not only the principles of protein folding but also the rationales of protein engineering. Crenarchaeal chromatin protein Cren7 provides an excellent research model for this issue. The small protein adopts a ‘β-barrel’ fold, formed by the double-stranded antiparallel β-sheet 1 tightly packing with the triple-stranded antiparallel β-sheet 2. The simple structure of Cren7 is stabilized by the hydrophobic core between the β-sheets, consisting of the side chains of V8, V10, L20, V25, F41 and F50. In the present work, mutation analyses by alanine substitution of each of the residues in the hydrophobic core were performed. Circular dichroism spectra and nuclear magnetic resonance analyses showed that mutation of F41 led to a significant misfolding of Cren7 through disruption of the β-sheets. Meanwhile, the mutant F41A showed a reduced thermostatility (Tm of 53.2 °C), as compared with the wild-type Cren7 (Tm > 80 °C). Biolayer interferometry and nick-closure assays showed the largely unchanged activities in DNA binding and supercoiling of F41A, indicating the DNA interface of Cren7 was generally retained in F41A. However, F41A was unable to mediate DNA bridging, probably due to the impairment in forming oligomers/polymers on DNA. Atomic force microscopic images of the F41A-DNA complexes also revealed that F41A nearly completely lost the ability to compact DNA into highly condensed structures. Our results not only reveal the critical role of F41 in protein folding of Cren7 but also provide new insights into the structure-function relationships of thermostable proteins.

Lysine Methylation Modulates the Interaction of Archaeal Chromatin Protein Cren7 With DNA.

Cren7 and Sis7d, two chromatin proteins from Sulfolobus islandicus, undergo extensive methylations at multiple lysine residues to various extents. Whether this highly conserved protein serves an epigenetic role in the regulation of the structure and function of the chromosome remains unclear. In the present study, we show that methylation significantly affects Cren7, but not Sis7d, in the ability to bind DNA and to constrain negative DNA supercoils. Strikingly, methylated Cren7 was significantly less efficient in forming oligomers or mediating intermolecular DNA bridging. Single-site substitution mutation with glutamine reveals that methylation of the four lysine residues (K24, K31, K42, and K48) of Cren7 at the protein-DNA interface, which are variably conserved among Cren7 homologues from different branches of the Crenarchaeota, influenced Cren7-DNA interactions in different manners. We suggest that dynamic methylation of Cren7 may represent a potential epigenetic mechanism involved in the chromosomal regulation in crenarchaea.

Archaeal chromatin 'slinkies' are inherently dynamic complexes with deflected DNA wrapping pathways.

Eukaryotes and many archaea package their DNA with histones. While the four eukaryotic histones wrap ~147 DNA base pairs into nucleosomes, archaeal histones form 'nucleosome-like' complexes that continuously wind between 60 and 500 base pairs of DNA ('archaeasomes'), suggested by crystal contacts and analysis of cellular chromatin. Solution structures of large archaeasomes (>90 DNA base pairs) have never been directly observed. Here, we utilize molecular dynamics simulations, analytical ultracentrifugation, and cryoEM to structurally characterize the solution state of archaeasomes on longer DNA. Simulations reveal dynamics of increased accessibility without disruption of DNA-binding or tetramerization interfaces. Mg2+ concentration influences compaction, and cryoEM densities illustrate that DNA is wrapped in consecutive substates arranged 90o out-of-plane with one another. Without ATP-dependent remodelers, archaea may leverage these inherent dynamics to balance chromatin packing and accessibility.

Archaeal Chromatin Proteins Cren7 and Sul7d Compact DNA by Bending and Bridging.

Archaeal chromatin proteins Cren7 and Sul7d from Sulfolobus are DNA benders. To better understand their architectural roles in chromosomal DNA organization, we analyzed DNA compaction by Cren7 and Sis7d, a Sul7d family member, from Sulfolobus islandicus at the single-molecule (SM) level by total single-molecule internal reflection fluorescence microscopy (SM-TIRFM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM). We show that both Cren7 and Sis7d were able to compact singly tethered λ DNA into a highly condensed structure in a three-step process and that Cren7 was over an order of magnitude more efficient than Sis7d in DNA compaction. The two proteins were similar in DNA bending kinetics but different in DNA condensation patterns. At saturating concentrations, Sis7d formed randomly distributed clusters whereas Cren7 generated a single and highly condensed core on plasmid DNA. This observation is consistent with the greater ability of Cren7 than of Sis7d to bridge DNA. Our results offer significant insights into the mechanism and kinetics of chromosomal DNA organization in Crenarchaea.IMPORTANCE A long-standing question is how chromosomal DNA is packaged in Crenarchaeota, a major group of archaea, which synthesize large amounts of unique small DNA-binding proteins but in general contain no archaeal histones. In the present work, we tested our hypothesis that the two well-studied crenarchaeal chromatin proteins Cren7 and Sul7d compact DNA by both DNA bending and bridging. We show that the two proteins are capable of compacting DNA, albeit with different efficiencies and in different manners, at the single molecule level. We demonstrate for the first time that the two proteins, which have long been regarded as DNA binders and benders, are able to mediate DNA bridging, and this previously unknown property of the proteins allows DNA to be packaged into highly condensed structures. Therefore, our results provide significant insights into the mechanism and kinetics of chromosomal DNA organization in Crenarchaeota.

Histone-DNA Interactions in the Archaeon Methanocaldococcus Jannaschii

The requirement for DNA compaction is universal across all domains of life. Although the histone proteins of Archaea and Eukaryotes have low sequence homology, the core histone fold is well-conserved and structures are virtually identical. However, small structural differences mean that Archaeal nucleosomes might assemble into a continuous solenoid-like fiber: the ‘hypernucleosome’. Given that M. jannaschii thrives at 80oC and its genomic DNA is positively supercoiled (the opposite to mesophiles like us), the mechanism of DNA packaging may show interesting adaptations and diversity that will inform us about the biophysics of chromatin in general. Here, we have used magnetic tweezers to control the supercoiling of DNA while quantifying the kinetics and energetics of DNA-histone binding, wrapping and compaction. Using this technique, we have investigated the properties of M. jannaschii chromatin with its most abundant histone protein “A3”. We propose a model for the force-extension properties of Archaeal chromatin, analogous to that for Eukaryotic chromatin, and demonstrate that the force-extension properties are dependent upon protein concentration. We find that, under moderate load, histone binding confers stability to DNA by preventing base-pair unstacking when negative supercoiling is applied, and the chromatin fiber shows a sharp buckling transition between both positive and negative supercoiling regimes. At high load (>5pN), the chromatin fiber is disrupted and the force-extension diagram returns to the worm-like chain, typical of naked DNA. Our model suggests a mechanism by which DNA processing enzymes may shunt or displace nucleosomes, obviating the need for active chromatin remodeling enzymes.

Solution Dynamics in Histone-Based Archaeal Chromatin

Over the last two decades, histone-fold containing proteins have been identified in most known Archaea, and their similarities in sequence and structure strongly suggest that they share a common evolutionary ancestor to the eukaryotic histones that form the nucleosome core particle. Recently, crystal structures of archaeal histones in complex with DNA have shown that they are capable of forming oligomers that bind DNA in superhelical turns that are identical to the nucleosome; however, archaeal chromatin can stack as an extended superhelix, in contrast to the defined particulate character of nucleosomes. Here, we have conducted molecular dynamics simulations on archaeal histone chromatin oligomers of varying sizes, and we compare these systems with one another and with nucleosomes in order to elucidate the structure-dynamics-function relationship of this superhelical stacking. Our models provide further proof that the interaction between L1 loops in neighboring archaeal histone dimers is paramount to chromatin stack formation, as its absence results in a highly dynamic complex. Furthermore, we find that eukaryotic histones are tighter binders of DNA, even when reduced to the hexasome complex and in the absence of the highly-charged histone tails. Together, these data provide further insight into the structural origin of chromatin, and display an energetic rationale for the evolution of the nucleosome complex.

Nonmutational mechanism of inheritance in the Archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus

Epigenetic phenomena have not yet been reported in archaea, which are presumed to use a classical genetic process of heritability. Here, analysis of independent lineages of Sulfolobus solfataricus evolved for enhanced fitness implicated a non-Mendelian basis for trait inheritance. The evolved strains, called super acid-resistant Crenarchaeota (SARC), acquired traits of extreme acid resistance and genome stability relative to their wild-type parental lines. Acid resistance was heritable because it was retained regardless of extensive passage without selection. Despite the hereditary pattern, in one strain, it was impossible for these SARC traits to result from mutation because its resequenced genome had no mutation. All strains also had conserved, heritable transcriptomes implicated in acid resistance. In addition, they had improved genome stability with absent or greatly decreased mutation and transposition relative to a passaged control. A mechanism that would confer these traits without DNA sequence alteration could involve posttranslationally modified archaeal chromatin proteins. To test this idea, homologous recombination with isogenic DNA was used to perturb native chromatin structure. Recombination at up-regulated loci from the heritable SARC transcriptome reduced acid resistance and gene expression in the majority of recombinants. In contrast, recombination at a control locus that was not part of the heritable transcriptome changed neither acid resistance nor gene expression. Variation in the amount of phenotypic and expression changes across individuals was consistent with Rad54-dependent chromatin remodeling that dictated crossover location and branch migration. These data support an epigenetic model implicating chromatin structure as a contributor to heritable traits.

Structural diversity of the nucleosome.

In eukaryotes, genomic DNA is compacted in chromatin, which generally suppresses transcription, replication, repair, and recombination. The fundamental unit of chromatin is the nucleosome, whose structure was first determined at atomic resolution in 1997. However, recent findings have revealed that the nucleosome is not a structurally homogenous entity. Nucleosomes containing histone variants often have subtle but clear differences in their structural and functional characteristics, as compared to the canonical nucleosome. In addition to the conventional nucleosome structure, the structure of the overlapping dinucleosome, a new structural unit of chromatin, has been determined. Although archaeal chromatin adopts a unique polymer architecture, its structural unit is very similar to that of the eukaryotic nucleosome, suggesting that the archaeal histone-like protein is orthologous to the eukaryotic histones. In this article, we review the diversity of the nucleosome structures, which plays key roles in their specific functions in the epigenetic regulation of chromatin.

Structural insights into archaeal chromatin

Structural insights into archaeal chromatin

Origin of DNA compaction

Chromosome Structure As a repeating unit in eukaryotic chromatin, a nucleosome wraps DNA in superhelical turns around a histone octamer. Mattiroli et al. present the crystal structure of an archaeal histone-DNA complex in which the histone-mediated DNA geometry is exactly the same as that in the nucleosome. Comparing features of archaeal and eukaryotic chromatin structures offers important insights into the evolution of eukaryotic nucleosomes. Science , this issue p. [609][1] [1]: /lookup/doi/10.1126/science.aaj1849

Structure of histone-based chromatin in Archaea.

Small basic proteins present in most Archaea share a common ancestor with the eukaryotic core histones. We report the crystal structure of an archaeal histone-DNA complex. DNA wraps around an extended polymer, formed by archaeal histone homodimers, in a quasi-continuous superhelix with the same geometry as DNA in the eukaryotic nucleosome. Substitutions of a conserved glycine at the interface of adjacent protein layers destabilize archaeal chromatin, reduce growth rate, and impair transcription regulation, confirming the biological importance of the polymeric structure. Our data establish that the histone-based mechanism of DNA compaction predates the nucleosome, illuminating the origin of the nucleosome.

Insights into the Structure of Sulfolobus Nucleoid Using Engineered Sac7d Dimers with a Defined Orientation

The structure of Archaeal chromatin or nucleoid is believed to have characteristics similar to that found in both eukaryotes and bacteria. Recent comparative studies have suggested that DNA compaction in Archaea requires a bridging protein (e.g., Alba) along with either a wrapping protein (e.g., a histone) or a bending protein such as Sac7d. While X-ray crystal structures demonstrate that Sac7d binds as a monomer to create a significant kink in duplex DNA, the structure of a multiprotein-DNA complex has not been established. Using cross-linked dimers of Sac7d with a defined orientation, we present evidence that indicates that Sac7d is able to largely coat duplex DNA in vivo by binding in alternating head-to-head and tail-to-tail orientations. Although each Sac7d monomer promotes a significant kink of nearly 70°, coated DNA is expected to be largely extended because of compensation of repetitive kinks with helical symmetry.

Transcription Regulation in Archaea.

The known diversity of metabolic strategies and physiological adaptations of archaeal species to extreme environments is extraordinary. Accurate and responsive mechanisms to ensure that gene expression patterns match the needs of the cell necessitate regulatory strategies that control the activities and output of the archaeal transcription apparatus. Archaea are reliant on a single RNA polymerase for all transcription, and many of the known regulatory mechanisms employed for archaeal transcription mimic strategies also employed for eukaryotic and bacterial species. Novel mechanisms of transcription regulation have become apparent by increasingly sophisticated in vivo and in vitro investigations of archaeal species. This review emphasizes recent progress in understanding archaeal transcription regulatory mechanisms and highlights insights gained from studies of the influence of archaeal chromatin on transcription.

Growth-Phase-Specific Modulation of Cell Morphology and Gene Expression by an Archaeal Histone Protein.

ABSTRACTIn all three domains of life, organisms use nonspecific DNA-binding proteins to compact and organize the genome as well as to regulate transcription on a global scale. Histone is the primary eukaryotic nucleoprotein, and its evolutionary roots can be traced to the archaea. However, not all archaea use this protein as the primary DNA-packaging component, raising questions regarding the role of histones in archaeal chromatin function. Here, quantitative phenotyping, transcriptomic, and proteomic assays were performed on deletion and overexpression mutants of the sole histone protein of the hypersaline-adapted haloarchaeal model organism Halobacterium salinarum. This protein is highly conserved among all sequenced haloarchaeal species and maintains hallmark residues required for eukaryotic histone functions. Surprisingly, despite this conservation at the sequence level, unlike in other archaea or eukaryotes, H. salinarum histone is required to regulate cell shape but is not necessary for survival. Genome-wide expression changes in histone deletion strains were global, significant but subtle in terms of fold change, bidirectional, and growth phase dependent. Mass spectrometric proteomic identification of proteins from chromatin enrichments yielded levels of histone and putative nucleoid-associated proteins similar to those of transcription factors, consistent with an open and transcriptionally active genome. Taken together, these data suggest that histone in H. salinarum plays a minor role in DNA compaction but important roles in growth-phase-dependent gene expression and regulation of cell shape. Histone function in haloarchaea more closely resembles a regulator of gene expression than a chromatin-organizing protein like canonical eukaryotic histone.

Structural Insights into Nonspecific Binding of DNA by TrmBL2, an Archaeal Chromatin Protein

The crystal structure of TrmBL2 from the archaeon Pyrococcus furiosus shows an association of two pseudosymmetric dimers. The dimers follow the prototypical design of known bacterial repressors with two helix–turn–helix (HTH) domains binding to successive major grooves of the DNA. However, in TrmBL2, the two dimers are arranged at a mutual displacement of approximately 2bp so that they associate with the DNA along the double-helical axis at an angle of approximately 80°.While the deoxyribose phosphate groups of the double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) used for co-crystallization are clearly seen in the electron density map, most of the nucleobases are averaged out. Refinement required to assume a superposition of at least three mutually displaced dsDNAs. The HTH domains interact primarily with the deoxyribose phosphate groups and polar interactions with the nucleobases are almost absent.This hitherto unseen mode of DNA binding by TrmBL2 seems to arise from nonoptimal protein–DNA contacts made by its four HTH domains resulting in a low-affinity, nonspecific binding to DNA.

A Prototypic Lysine Methyltransferase 4 from Archaea with Degenerate Sequence Specificity Methylates Chromatin Proteins Sul7d and Cren7 in Different Patterns

The origin of eukaryotic histone modification enzymes still remains obscure. Prototypic KMT4/Dot1 from Archaea targets chromatin proteins (Sul7d and Cren7) and shows increased activity on Sul7d, but not Cren7, in the presence of DNA. Promiscuous aKMT4 could be regulated by chromatin environment. This study supports the prokaryotic origin model of eukaryotic histone methyltransferases and sheds light on chromatin dynamics in Archaea. Histone methylation is one of the major epigenetic modifications even in early diverging unicellular eukaryotes. We show that a widespread lysine methyltransferase from Archaea (aKMT4), bears striking structural and functional resemblance to the core of distantly related eukaryotic KMT4/Dot1. aKMT4 methylates a set of various proteins, including the chromatin proteins Sul7d and Cren7, and RNA exosome components. Csl4- and Rrp4-exosome complexes are methylated in different patterns. aKMT4 can self-methylate intramolecularly and compete with other proteins for the methyl group. Automethylation is inhibited by suitable substrates or DNA in a concentration-dependent manner. The automethylated enzyme shows relatively compromised activity. aKMT4-8A mutant with abrogated automethylation shows a more than 150% increase in methylation of substrates, suggesting a possible mechanism to regulate methyltransferase activity. More interestingly, methylation of Sul7d, but not Cren7, by aKMT4 is significantly enhanced by DNA. MS/MS and kinetic analysis further suggest that aKMT4 methylates Sul7d in the chromatin context. These data provide a clue to the possible regulation of aKMT4 activity by the local chromatin environment, albeit as a promiscuous enzyme required for extensive and variegated lysine methylation in Sulfolobus. This study supports the prokaryotic origin model of eukaryotic histone modification enzymes and sheds light on regulation of archaeal chromatin.

Interactions of Archaeal Chromatin Proteins Alba1 and Alba2 with Nucleic Acids

BackgroundArchitectural proteins have important roles in compacting and organising chromosomal DNA. There are two potential histone counterpart peptide sequences (Alba1 and Alba2) in the Aeropyrum pernix genome (APE1832.1 and APE1823).Methodology/Principal FindingsThese two peptides were expressed and their interactions with various DNAs were studied using a combination of various experimental techniques: surface plasmon resonance, UV spectrophotometry, circular dichroism–spectropolarimetry, gel-shift assays, and isothermal titration calorimetry.Conclusions/SignificanceOur data indicate that there are significant differences in the properties of the Alba1 and Alba2 proteins. Both of these Alba proteins can thermally stabilise DNA polynucleotides, as seen from UV melting curves. Alba2 and equimolar mixtures of Alba1/Alba2 have greater effects on the thermal stability of poly(dA-dT).poly(dA-dT). Surface plasmon resonance sensorgrams for binding of Alba1, Alba2, and equimolar mixtures of Alba1/Alba2 to DNA oligonucleotides show different binding patterns. Circular dichroism indicates that Alba2 has a less-ordered secondary structure than Alba1. The secondary structures of the Alba proteins are not significantly influenced by DNA binding, even at high temperatures. Based on these data, we conclude that Alba1, Alba2, and equimolar mixtures of Alba1/Alba2 show different properties in their binding to various DNAs.

The Architects of the Archaeal Chromatin

Architectural proteins play an important role in organizing and compacting the genome in all three kingdoms of life. Archaeal chromatin proteins show similarities with both bacterial and eukaryotic chromatin proteins.The thermophilic model organism Sulfolobus expresses four different chromatin proteins: Cren7, Sul7, Alba and Sso10a. To characterize the architectural properties of these proteins we use a single-molecule approach. We have observed that these proteins are all able to compact DNA, exhibiting different sets of binding modes. In addition to DNA compaction and organization, these proteins are believed to play an important role in maintaining genome integrity at high environmental temperatures. High temperature single-molecule measurements showed how DNA structure is affected by temperature and how chromatin proteins affect DNA stability at these temperatures.View Large Image | View Hi-Res Image | Download PowerPoint Slide

Crenarchaeal chromatin proteins Cren7 and Sul7 compact DNA by inducing rigid bends

Archaeal chromatin proteins share molecular and functional similarities with both bacterial and eukaryotic chromatin proteins. These proteins play an important role in functionally organizing the genomic DNA into a compact nucleoid. Cren7 and Sul7 are two crenarchaeal nucleoid-associated proteins, which are structurally homologous, but not conserved at the sequence level. Co-crystal structures have shown that these two proteins induce a sharp bend on binding to DNA. In this study, we have investigated the architectural properties of these proteins using atomic force microscopy, molecular dynamics simulations and magnetic tweezers. We demonstrate that Cren7 and Sul7 both compact DNA molecules to a similar extent. Using a theoretical model, we quantify the number of individual proteins bound to the DNA as a function of protein concentration and show that forces up to 3.5 pN do not affect this binding. Moreover, we investigate the flexibility of the bending angle induced by Cren7 and Sul7 and show that the protein–DNA complexes differ in flexibility from analogous bacterial and eukaryotic DNA-bending proteins.