The aftermath of the repression launched by the military coup d'etat of September 1, 1973, in Chile has brought with it the need for the victims of arbitrary arrest, torture, detention, and exile to find a way to express this unprecedented experience. Their testimonies respond to a rupture in the mode of collective perception of Chile's political development. The relative enforcement of bourgeois rights in previous decades, together with the acritical and general acceptance of an ideology that represented Chile as a nation with a solid democratic tradition, masked the intermittent massacres of workers, military plots, and repression of unions and left wing parties from the late 19th century to the present. Nevertheless, the military Junta's policy of systematic repression unquestionably marks a break in Chilean history that the intelligentsia has been forced to confront, analyze, and express. In particular, the coup and the repression have imposed new urgencies, themes, and forms on recent Chilean literature as it has sought to represent in artistic form the movement of the present. We should speak here of a literature founded on a patrimony of accumulated collective suffering. For this reason, a meditation on technique, its application, and concrete results cannot simply be located at the level of a solitary and gratuitous alienation. Chilean writers of the post-coup period are working to establish modes of consciousness and sensibility through which those who support the popular movement can think and feel the political tasks they will have to confront individually and collectively in the immediate future. Chilean literary criticism must also play a role in this process. This essay begins from the presupposition that literature is an ideological form. Literature is the imaginary representation of real social relations. Ideologies are typifications of human groups in the process of generating a culture. Human groups reproduce themselves as historical beings in the context of the prevailing cultural, economic, and political structures. Literature differentiates itself from other ideological forms-such as religion, philosophy, political theory, law, and science (to the extent that scientific practice remains bound up with ideology)-on the basis of its choice of anthropocentric representational