AraC Protein Research Articles

Formation of AraC-DNA sandwiches.

With the use of special DNA binding sites, but not the natural aral binding site, the dimeric AraC protein can be forced to make sandwich structures in which two DNA molecules are joined by two AraC protein dimers. Apparently one subunit from each dimer contacts each DNA molecule in an extended structure. These sandwich structures form only in the absence of arabinose. This behavior is consistent with the protein's ability to form DNA loops by binding to separated half sites in the absence of arabinose and its preference for binding to adjacent half-sites in the presence of arabinose.

AraC protein contacts asymmetric sites in the Escherichia coli araFGH promoter.

AraC protein regulates the transcription of arabinose transport and catabolic operons in Escherichia coli through interaction with specific DNA sequences in the promoter regions of the operons. The interaction of AraC protein with two binding sites in the araFGH promoter was determined and compared to previously studied AraC binding sites in the araBAD promoter. Methylation and ethylation interference assays show that AraC protein binds along one side of the DNA to four adjacent major groove regions at each of the araFG1 and araFG2 sites. Mutations within any of the four regions of araFG1 greatly reduce protein binding in vitro. The promoter function in vivo is also greatly reduced, indicating that all four regions of the binding site are required. The chemical interference and genetic data, combined with the consensus sequence for AraC protein binding to ara promoters, support a binding motif in which two directly repeated units each span two adjacent turns of the DNA helix. The function of the two AraC binding sites was also examined. The proximal araFG1 site is required for promoter activation, whereas the distal araFG2 site has only a slight effect on the promoter activity.

Mutations in the araC gene of Salmonella typhimurium LT2 which affect both activator and auto-regulatory functions of the AraC protein

The araC gene encodes a regulatory protein, AraC, that acts as both an activator and a repressor of transcription of the genes involved in the transport and catabolism of l-arabinose in Salmonella typhimurium LT2. Five araC mutants which have altered regulatory properties were characterized. All are point mutations which would result in amino acid substitutions near the C terminus of AraC. Each mutation results in altered activator and auto-regulatory AraC function in vivo. In vitro DNA-binding assays showed that three mutant AraC have measurable lowered affinity for aca controlling site DNA. The data are consistent with a model in which there is a DNA-binding domain in the C terminus of AraC which functions in both activation and repression.

Repression of the araBAD promoter from araO1

DNA looping between the araO 2 and araI sites holds the uninduced or basal level of expression of the araBAD genes from the p BAD promoter at a low level. Despite the presence of another and closer site potentially capable of mediating looping to araI, no repression from this site, called araO 1, is observed. Here we show, using both in vivo and in vitro experiments, that the araO 1 site is not normally occupied by AraC protein under repressing conditions, but that if AraC protein is overproduced and the araO 2 site is absent, araO 1 is then occupied and repression of p BAD can be observed.

AraC-DNA looping: Orientation and distance-dependent loop breaking by the cyclic AMP receptor protein

The arabinose operon promoter, p bad, is negatively regulated in the absence of arabinose by AraC protein, which forms a DNA loop by binding to two sites separated by 210 base-pairs, ara0 2 and araI 1 . p bad is also positively regulated by AraC—arabinose and the cyclic AMP receptor protein, CRP. We provide evidence that CRP breaks the ara0 2—araI 1 repression loop in vitro. The ability of CRP to break the loop in vitro and to activate p bad in vivo is dependent upon the orientation and distance of the CRP binding site relative to araI 1 . An insertion of one DNA helical turn, 11 base-pairs, between CRP and araI only partially inhibits CRP loop breaking and activation of p bad, while an insertion of less than one DNA helical turn, 4 base-pairs, not only abolishes CRP activation and loop breaking, but actually causes CRP to stabilize the loop and increases the araO 2 -mediated repression of p bad. Both integral and non-integral insertions of greater than one helical turn completely abolish CRP activation and loop breaking in vitro.

DNA Looping and Unlooping by AraC Protein

Expression of the L-arabinose BAD operon in Escherichia coli is regulated by AraC protein which acts both positively in the presence of arabinose to induce transcription and negatively in the absence of arabinose to repress transcription. The repression of the araBAD promoter is mediated by DNA looping between AraC protein bound at two sites near the promoter separated by 210 base pairs, araI and araO2. In vivo and in vitro experiments presented here show that an AraC dimer, with binding to half of araI and to araO2, maintains the repressed state of the operon. The addition of arabinose, which induces the operon, breaks the loop, and shifts the interactions from the distal araO2 site to the previously unoccupied half of the araI site. The conversion between the two states does not require additional binding of AraC protein and appears to be driven largely by properties of the protein rather than being specified by the slightly different DNA sequences of the binding sites. Slight reorientation of the subunits of AraC could specify looping or unlooping by the protein. Such a mechanism could account for regulation of DNA looping in other systems.

Characterization of the Escherichia coli araFGH and araJ promoters

The identities of two cloned, arabinose-inducible promoters were tested by hybridizing promoter DNA fragments with restriction digests of chromosomal DNA containing Mudlac phage inserted in either araFGH or in araE transport operons. One promoter, thought to be araE, is within 10(3) base-pairs of a Mudlac insertion in the araE gene. The second promoter was not found within several thousand base-pairs of either of the known transport genes. This promoter is now named araPJ (araJ). The DNA sequence of the fragment containing the araFGH promoter was determined. The start site of transcription in vivo was located to within +/- 1 base-pair (bp) by S1 nuclease mapping. DNase 1 footprinting revealed that, in comparison with the araBAD and araE promoters, the locations of the AraC and cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP) binding sites are reversed with CRP lying between AraC and RNA polymerase. The central location of the CRP binding site may explain why the araFGH promoter is more catabolite sensitive than the other ara promoters. AraC and CRP were both required for maximal transcription in vitro, although a low level of transcription was detected with CRP alone. S1 nuclease mapping of mRNA-DNA hybrids from the araJ promoter located the transcription start point to within #/- 3 bp, and demonstrates that the promoter is dependent upon AraC protein and CRP in vivo. DNase footprinting showed that the location of the AraC protein binding site on araJ is adjacent to the RNA polymerase site, as seen at the araBAD and araE promoters. Two CRP sites were observed; one is upstream from the AraC site and one is downstream from the transcription start site.

Activation of ara operons by a truncated AraC protein does not require inducer.

The araC gene of Escherichia coli encodes a protein that binds the inducer L-arabinose to activate the transcription of three ara operons. In a study to determine the functional domains within the AraC protein, we have generated a set of overlapping deletions from the proximal end of the araC gene. We found that the removal of up to nearly 60% of the coding sequence of this protein still allows transcriptional activation of the ara operons in vivo, up to 27% that of the wild type. These truncated proteins, however, no longer require arabinose for induction. The ligand-induced conformational change apparently either releases or unmasks an existing functional domain within AraC, rather than generating a new conformation that is required for activation of the promoter of araBAD. Since the truncated protein of the mutant C154 (which lacks 153 amino acid residues from the N terminus) retains DNA binding specificity, the DNA-recognition domain is localized in the C-terminal half of the AraC protein. Truncated proteins were unable to repress araBAD or araC in vivo, even though they were able to bind all ara operators. We propose that the N-terminal half of AraC is essential for the formation of the DNA loops that are responsible for repression of araBAD and for autoregulation of araC.

Signal-regulator interactions, genetic analysis of the effector binding site of xyls, the benzoate-activated positive regulator of Pseudomonas TOL plasmid meta-cleavage pathway operon

This study reports a genetic analysis of the interactions between a positive regulator of gene expression and its effector molecules. Transcription of the TOL plasmid meta-cleavage pathway operon is specifically stimulated by the XylS protein positive regulator either through activation of this regulator by benzoate effectors or through its hyperproduction. One xylS mutant that exhibits constitutive expression of the operon promoter has been characterized, together with six mutants encoding altered XylS proteins that recognize as effectors benzoate analogues that are non-effectors for the XylS wild-type protein. The changes in two mutant regulators are located at the N-terminal end of the protein, within a putative β-pleated domain. These mutant proteins exhibit a markedly increased affinity for normal benzoate effectors, with K′ s values fivefold to 60-fold lower than those of the wild-type XylS protein. They are additionally activated by new effectors having certain substituents at position 2, 3 and 4 of the aromatic ring. Two other mutant proteins recognize new effectors having substituents at position 4 and 5 of the aromatic ring, and contain mutations at their C-terminal end within a putative α-helix-rich domain. Three other mutations, one of which leads to constitutive expression from Pm, each result in an amino acid change in the central region of the regulator. These findings suggest but do not prove that the effector binding pocket of the XylS protein may be composed of two or more non-contiguous segments of its primary structure. The XylS protein exhibits homology with the AraC protein of Escherichia coli, a protein that stimulates transcription from ara promoters when it is activated by arabinose or benzoate. Mutations influencing effector activation of the XylS protein characterized in this study are all located in regions exhibiting a high degree of homology with the corresponding aligned sequence of AraC protein.

Studies on the domain structure of the Salmonella typhimurium AraC protein.

The Salmonella typhimurium araC gene product is known to be susceptible to proteolytic degradation. Limited cleavage by trypsin, kallikrein, elastase and pronase E yields stable fragments comprising approximately the N-terminal two thirds of the AraC protein. These fragments have in common the ability to dimerize in solution and to bind L-arabinose and D-fucose. Under appropriate conditions, hydrolysis of the AraC protein with Staphylococcus aureus V8 protease leads to a small C-terminal fragment which is able to bind specifically to a synthetic ara consensus sequence. These results indicate that, as with several other prokaryotic gene regulatory proteins, the basic functions of effector binding, subunit interaction and specific DNA binding are segregated into distinct domains of the AraC protein.

Determining residue-base interactions between AraC protein and araI DNA

Depurination/depyrimidation binding-interference experiments (missing contact probing) identified specific candidate residue-base interactions lost by mutants of Escherichia coli l-arabinose operon regulatory protein, AraC, to one of its binding sites, araI. These candidates were then checked more rigorously by comparing the affinities of wild-type and alanine-substituted AraC protein to variants of araI with alterations in the candidate contacted positions. Residues 208 and 212 apparently contact DNA and support, but do not prove the existence of a helix-turn-helix structure in this region of AraC protein whereas contacts by mutants with alterations at positions 256, 257 and 261 which are within another potential helix-turn-helix region do not support the existence of such a structure there. The missing contacts displayed by three AraC mutants are found within two major groove regions of the DNA and are spaced 21 base-pairs apart in a pattern indicating a direct repeat orientation for the subunits of AraC.

In vivo DNA loops in araCBAD: size limits and helical repeat.

Formation of a DNA loop by AraC proteins bound at the araI and araO2 sites, whose center-to-center distance is 211 base pairs, is necessary for repression of the araBAD promoter, PBAD, of Escherichia coli. To determine the upper and lower size limits of the loop, we constructed PBAD-reporter gene fusion plasmids with various spacings between araI and araO2 and measured their levels of expression. Spacings larger than about 500 base pairs resulted in elimination of detectable repression. No lower limit to spacing was found, suggesting that AraC protein itself possesses significant flexibility and its bending substantially aids formation of small loops. As the spacing between araI and araO2 varied, the activity of PBAD oscillated with an 11.1-base-pair periodicity, implying that the in vivo helical repeat of this DNA is 11.1 base pairs per turn.

Novel activation of araC expression and a DNA site required for araC autoregulation in Escherichia coli B/r.

Mutations in the araC gene have been isolated which alter both the activator and autoregulatory functions of AraC protein (L.G. Cass and G. Wilcox, J. Bacteriol. 166:892-900, 1986). In this study, the effect of each araC mutation on autoregulation was characterized in vivo and in vitro in the presence of L-arabinose. The effect of L-arabinose in some of these araC mutants revealed a novel activation of araC expression which was not observed in the araC+ cell. Experiments were therefore focused on understanding the mechanism of this novel activation. We describe a systematic analysis of the effect of mutations within the known regulatory binding sites for araBAD and araC transcription on araC expression. Our results suggest that the novel activation of araC expression requires the AraC activator-binding site, araI, and the cyclic AMP receptor protein-cyclic AMP complex-binding site. We also found that in the absence of L-arabinose, the araI site was required for maximal autoregulation by the wild-type AraC protein.

Alternative DNA loops regulate the arabinose operon in Escherichia coli.

The araCBAD regulatory region of Escherichia coli contains two divergently oriented promoters and three sites to which AraC, the regulatory protein of the operon, can bind. This paper presents the results of in vivo dimethyl sulfate "footprinting" experiments to monitor occupancy of the three AraC sites and measurements of activity of the two promoters. These measurements were made both in the absence of the inducer arabinose and at various times after arabinose addition to growing cells containing the wild-type ara regulatory region or the regulatory region containing various deletions and point mutations. The data lead to the conclusion that two different DNA loops can form in the ara regulatory region. These loops are generated by AraC protein molecules binding to two different DNA sites and binding to each other. One of these loops predominates in the absence of arabinose and plays a major role in repressing activity of one of the promoters. Upon the addition of arabinose the amount of the first loop type, the repression loop, decreases and the amount of a second loop increases. Formation of this second loop precludes the counterproductive formation of the repression loop.

AraC proteins with altered DNA sequence specificity which activate a mutant promoter in Escherichia coli.

We examined the recognition of the araBAD promoter by the AraC protein in the Escherichia coli arabinose operon. A mutant promoter, with base substitutions at positions contacted by AraC, was used to isolate suppressor mutations in araC by direct selection. Two hydroxylamine-induced araC mutations were isolated repeatedly; each contained a single amino acid substitution. When tested against a set of base substitution promoter mutants, one revertant, an Arg to His substitution at residue 250, displayed altered base specificity for a single position within the araBAD promoter. The other revertant, a Cys to Tyr substitution at residue 204, did not show consistent base-specific suppression. Neither demonstrated a higher affinity than the wild type protein for the mutant promoter in vitro. Both proteins suppress mutant sequences by a mechanism that does not appear to involve the formation of new net favorable contacts with the mutant base pairs of the promoter.

Three binding sites for AraC protein are required for autoregulation of araC in Escherichia coli.

Three binding sites for AraC protein were shown to be required for the autoregulation of araC: araI1, araO1, and araO2. Selective inactivation of AraC-binding sites on the DNA demonstrated that araO1 and araO2 are required in vivo to produce repression of araC in the presence of arabinose, whereas araI1 and araO2 are required in its absence. We found that the low-affinity site araO2 is essential for araC autoregulation; araO1 and araI1 provide high-affinity AraC-binding sites, which allow cooperative binding at araO2. Profound effects on the araBAD promoter and the araC promoter are produced by ligand-induced changes in AraC occupancy of functional sites on the DNA. We suggest that AraC exerts its multiplicity of controls through two alternative states of cooperative interactions with DNA and we illustrate this with a model. This model presents our interpretations of activation and repression of the araBAD operon and the autoregulation of the araC gene.

Arabinose-induced binding of AraC protein to araI2 activates the araBAD operon promoter.

The state of Escherichia coli araI DNA occupancy by AraC protein has been found to change from a two-turn to a four-turn occupancy upon the addition of the inducer arabinose. The araI site is separable into two contiguous regions, araI1 and araI2. araI1 binds both ligand-bound and ligand-free AraC protein, whereas araI2 binds AraC protein in the presence of arabinose only. A mutation in araI and a known mutation in araC led to the loss of araI2 binding, while binding to araI1 was unaffected. Both mutants failed to activate the promoter of the araBAD operon. We propose that araI2 occupancy by AraC protein leads to RNA polymerase recognition of the araBAD promoter and that araI1 acts as a switch mechanism allowing both the repressor and the activator forms of AraC protein to regulate the araBAD promoter.

Equilibrium DNA-binding of AraC protein: Compensation for displaced ions

Experiments on the AraC regulatory protein of Escherichia coli suggest a mechanism that DNA-binding proteins can use to reduce potentially drastic alterations in their affinity for DNA resulting from changes in salt concentration. Measurement of the net number of ions apparently displaced as AraC protein binds DNA and of fluorescence changes in the protein lead to the following picture. About 14 ions are displaced from the DNA as the protein binds the araI site. As the protein binds the DNA, however, it undergoes a conformational change and binds about ten ions. Consequently, the net order of the reaction is reduced from 15th to about fourth order in salt concentration.

The araC gene of Citrobacter freundii

The araC gene of Citrobacter freundii was cloned into plasmid pBR322 and expressed in Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium. The nucleotide sequence and the predicted translational product were determined and compared to those of E. coli, S. typhimurium and Erwinia carotovora. The predicted translational product is 281 amino acids (aa) long, identical in size to that of S. typhimurium, and is 11 and 29 aa shorter than that of E. coli and E. carotovora, respectively. The nucleotide sequence of the araC gene of C. freundii is 83% homologous to the araC genes of both E. coli and S. typhimurium, but only 60% homologous to that of E. carotovora with respect to the regions they share. The predicted amino acid sequence is highly conserved and shows 96% and 94% homology to S. typhimurium and E. coli, respectively. E. carotovora shows only a 58% aa homology. The activator and autoregulatory activities of each plasmid encoded AraC protein in a S. typhimurium araC:: lacZ protein fusion strain were examined.

The DNA loop model for ara repression: AraC protein occupies the proposed loop sites in vivo and repression-negative mutations lie in these same sites.

Two sets of experiments have been performed to test the DNA loop model of repression of the araBAD operon of Escherichia coli. First, dimethyl sulfate methylation protection measurements on normally growing cells show that the AraC regulatory protein occupies the araI site in the presence and absence of the inducer arabinose. Similarly, the araO2 site is shown to be occupied by AraC protein in the presence and absence of arabinose; however, its occupancy by AraC is greatly reduced when araI and adjacent sequences are deleted. Thus, AraC protein binds to araO2 cooperatively with some other component of the ara system located at least 60 base pairs away. Second, the mutational analysis presented here shows that the DNA components required for repression of araBAD are araI, araO2, and perhaps the araBAD operon RNA polymerase binding site.