The premise that particular personality characteristics of the psychotherapist interact with those of the patient to influence therapeutic outcome has stimulated research. The major part of this has concerned the A-B therapist type variable (2). Although the early studies of the A-B variable involved actual therapists and actual patients, further research has regarded the A-B variable as defining male characterological types, a position having empirical support (3). Viewing the A-B dimension as charanerological has resulted in a burgeoning of research designed to define rhe A and B cype male. Smith (5) summarized this research as suggesting that A males, relative to Bs, tend to be socially cautious, inhibited, desiring of social approval, highly verbal, uninterested in mechanics and mechanical activities, field-dependent, trusting, intropunitive, and collaborative in stress situations, and low in extrapunitive reactions to frustration. In contrast to the A, the B tends ro be risk-taking, socially affiliative, masculine, high in namral science aptitude, interested in engineering, field-independent, suspicious, extrapunitive, and avoidant in stress situations, and extrapunicive in situations of frustration. The present research is an outgrowth of Smith's (5) work, in which he found that As and Bs exhibited significantly different postural and gestural behaviors during dyadic interviews (As being more subtle and cautious than Bs). Based on the over-all pictures . of the A and the B it was hypothesized that As relative ro Bs are more sensitive to the subtle non-verbal channels of communication. If this is true, As and Bs should react differentially to communications in which the verbal and non-verbal channels are incongruent, i.e., As will react more to the non-verbal, Bs to the verbal. Two instruments were employed to investigate the hypothesized differential reactions of As and Bs to incongruent communications. First, was a standardized paper-and-pencil scale (4) in which line drawings depicting emotional states were to be matched with written statements. The second instrument ( I), consisted of videotaped statements of an actor, in which his verbal and non-verbal statements were either congruent or incongruent (the statements involved the dimensions of happy-sad and of superior-inferior). Fifty-eight male undergraduates, designated as As or Bs on the A-B scale, rated the videotaped scenes as to their message, and then were given the Shapiro scale. An analysis of variance gave no differences between As and Bs on either the videoTape ratings or scores on the Shapiro scale. The consistent lack of differences between As and Bs on the two methodologically diverse instruments suggests strongly that the hypothesis is not valid. The data suggest rhe conclusion that As and Bs are. not (as groups) differentially sensitive to non-verbal channels of communication.