Approach For Total Hip Arthroplasty Research Articles

A Randomized Clinical Trial of Direct Anterior versus Mini-Posterior Total Hip Arthroplasty: Small, Early Functional Differences Did Not Lead to Meaningful Clinical Differences at 7.5 Years

Our previously reported randomized clinical trial of direct anterior approach (DAA) versus mini-posterior approach (MPA) total hip arthroplasty (THA) showed slightly faster initial recovery for patients who had a DAA and no differences in complications or clinical or radiographic outcomes beyond 8 weeks. The aims of the current study were to determine if early advantages of DAA led to meaningful clinical differences beyond 5 years and to identify differences in midterm complications. Of 101 original patients, 93 were eligible for follow-up at a mean 7.5 years (range, 2.1 to 10). Clinical outcomes were compared with Harris Hip, 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), and Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Scores (HOOS) scores and sub-scores, complications, reoperations, and revisions. Harris Hip scores were similar (95.3 ± 6.0 versus 93.5 ± 10.3 for DAA and MPA, respectively, P = 0.79). The SF-12 physical and mental scores were similar (46.2 ± 9.3 versus 46.2 ± 10.6, P = 0.79, and 52.3 ± 7.1 versus 55.2 ± 4.5, P = 0.07 in the DAA and MPA groups, respectively). The HOOS scores were similar (97.4 ± 7.9 versus 96.3 ± 6.7 for DAA and MPA, respectively, P = 0.07). The HOOS quality of life subscores were 96.9 ± 10.8 versus 92.3 ± 16.0 for DAA and MPA, respectively (P = 0.046). No clinical outcome met the minimally clinically important difference. There were 4 surgical complications in the DAA group (1 femoral loosening requiring revision, 1 dislocation treated closed, and 2 wound dehiscences requiring debridement), and 6 surgical complications in the MPA group (3 dislocations, 2 treated closed, and 1 revised to dual-mobility; 2 intraoperative fractures treated with a cable; and 1 wound dehiscence treated nonoperatively). At a mean of 7.5 years, this RCT demonstrated no clinically meaningful differences in outcomes, complications, reoperations, or revisions between DAA and MPA THA.

Similar incidence of postoperative sciatic nerve palsy in direct anterior and posterior approach total hip arthroplasty.

Sciatic nerve palsy is a rare but devastating complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA). While the use of the direct anterior approach is increasing, limited data exist regarding sciatic nerve palsy and surgical approach. The purpose of this study was to determine the factors and outcomes associated with sciatic nerve palsy (SNP) after THA. A retrospective analysis was performed at a single institution of 7 SNP that occurred in 4045 THA via direct anterior approach and 10 SNP in 8854 THA via posterior approach, being operated between 01 January 2017 and 12 December 2021. SNP patients were matched 1:5 to patients without SNP. Medical records were reviewed for demographics including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, and preoperative indication. Additional workup of SNP patients including advanced imaging and reoperation were documented. Recovery grades were assigned to all SNP patients at most recent clinical follow-up. 5 of the SNP were complete and 12 partial. They occurred as frequently with the direct anterior (0.17%) and posterior approach (0.11%, p = 0.5). The presence of femur cables and reoperations were associated with SNP (p = 0.04 and p = 0.002, respecitvely). Age, gender, BMI, comorbidities, and surgical indication had no effect on SNP. 4 of the 17 affected patients had almost complete recovery at latest follow-up. The incidence of SNP was similar in direct anterior and posterior approach. Surgeons should counsel patients regarding the risks of SNP regardless of the used approach.

Dynamics of manual impaction instruments during total hip arthroplasty.

Manual impaction, with a mallet and introducer, remains the standard method of installing cementless acetabular cups during total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study aims to quantify the accuracy and precision of manual impaction strikes during the seating of an acetabular component. This understanding aims to help improve impaction surgical techniques and inform the development of future technologies. Posterior approach THAs were carried out on three cadavers by an expert orthopaedic surgeon. An instrumented mallet and introducer were used to insert cementless acetabular cups. The motion of the mallet, relative to the introducer, was analyzed for a total of 110 strikes split into low-, medium-, and high-effort strikes. Three parameters were extracted from these data: strike vector, strike offset, and mallet face alignment. The force vector of the mallet strike, relative to the introducer axis, was misaligned by an average of 18.1°, resulting in an average wasted strike energy of 6.1%. Furthermore, the mean strike offset was 19.8 mm from the centre of the introducer axis and the mallet face, relative to the introducer strike face, was misaligned by a mean angle of 15.2° from the introducer strike face. The direction of the impact vector in manual impaction lacks both accuracy and precision. There is an opportunity to improve this through more advanced impaction instruments or surgical training.

Does Surgical Approach Affect Dislocation Rate After Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Who Have Prior Lumbar Spinal Fusion? A Retrospective Analysis of 16,223 Cases

BACKGROUNDLumbar spinal fusion (LSF) is a risk factor for dislocation following total hip arthroplasty (THA). The effect of the surgical approach on this association has not been investigated. This study examined the association between approach and dislocation following THA in patients who had prior LSF. METHODSWe retrospectively reviewed 16,223 primary elective THAs at our institution from June 2011 to September 2022. Patients who had LSF prior to THA were identified using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes. Patients were stratified by LSF history, surgical approach, and intraoperative robot/navigation use to compare dislocation rates. There were 8,962 (55.2%) posterior, 5,971 (36.8%) anterior, and 1,290 (8.0%) laterally-based THAs. Prior LSF was identified in 323 patients (2.0%). Binary logistic regressions were used to assess the association of patient factors with dislocation risk. RESULTSThere were 177 dislocations identified in total (1.1%). In non-adjusted analyses, the dislocation rate was significantly higher following the posterior approach among all patients (P = 0.003). Prior LSF was associated with a significantly higher dislocation rate in all patients (P < 0.001) and within the posterior (P < 0.001), but not the anterior approach (P = 0.514) subgroups. Multivariate regressions demonstrated anterior (OR [odds ratio] = 0.64, 95% CI [confidence interval] 0.45 to 0.91, P = 0.013) and laterally-based (OR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.96, P = 0.039) approaches were associated with decreased dislocation risk, whereas prior LSF (OR = 4.28, 95% CI 2.38 to 7.69, P < 0.001) was associated with increased dislocation risk. Intraoperative technology utilization was not significantly associated with dislocation in the multivariate regressions (OR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.06, P = 0.095). CONCLUSIONThe current study confirmed that LSF is a significant risk factor for dislocation following THA, however, anterior and laterally-based approaches may mitigate dislocation risk in this population. In multivariate analyses including approach, LSF, and several perioperative variables, intraoperative technology utilization was not found to be significantly associated with dislocation risk.

Rapid Return to Braking After Anterior and Posterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Little is known about the effect of surgical approach on return to braking after total hip arthroplasty (THA), and few studies have investigated braking after THA with modern surgical techniques and rehabilitation protocols. In a prospective comparative design, we enrolled 65 patients who received right-sided primary THA at our institution from April 2018 through March 2020, 34 with a direct anterior approach (DAA) and 31 with a posterior approach (PA). Braking tests measuring brake reaction time (BRT) and brake pedal depression (BPD) were administered to patients preoperatively and at 1, 2, and 4 weeks postoperatively using a realistic driving simulator. BRT and BPD were compared between groups and preoperatively versus postoperatively using mixed-effects models. Preoperative BRT averaged 638 msec in the DAA group and 604 msec in the PA group (P = 0.31). At 1 week postoperatively, the DAA group had significantly prolonged BRT compared with preoperatively (694 msec, P = 0.02). No significant difference was observed in the PA group (633 msec, P = 0.31). Both groups had returned to baseline by 2 weeks, and both had significantly faster BRT at 4 weeks compared with preoperatively (583 msec for DAA, P = 0.01; 537 msec for PA, P < 0.001). BPD was similar between groups, and there were no significant differences between preoperative and postoperative BPD at any time point. With modern surgical techniques, BRT after right-sided THA returns to baseline levels approximately 2 weeks after surgery. There seems to be a quicker return to preoperative BRT observed in patients with a PA.

Incidence of heterotopic ossification following total hip arthroplasty by approach: a systematic review.

Heterotopic ossification (HO) formation has been increasingly recognized as a complication of major orthopedic surgeries, particularly total hip arthroplasty (THA). Though, the overall incidence of HO following THA has been well-documented, it is often not reported by severity or by surgical approach. (1) What are the demographics of patients with HO? (2) What is the severity of HO following THA using the Brooker classification? (3) What is the incidence and class of HO following different THA approaches (anterior, posterior, posterolateral, anterolateral, superior, lateral, trans-gluteal)? (4) What are the number and training level of surgeons who performed each procedure? The PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were queried, and PRISMA guidelines were followed. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were performed using Microsoft Excel. We isolated 26 studies evaluating 6512 total hip arthroplasties (THA). The mean HO percentage overall was 28.8%, mostly Class I (54.2%) or Class II (29.6%). The highest percentage of HO was associated with the modified direct lateral (57.2%) and the traditional lateral (34.6%) approaches. The lowest HO percentages were identified following posterolateral (12.8%) and direct superior approaches (1%). Most studies reported a singular senior surgeon operating within the same approach for all patients. The traditional lateral and modified direct lateral approaches to THA resulted in the highest percentage of HO postoperatively. However, most ossification cases were not clinically significant and did not strongly affect overall patient morbidity. Further studies are warranted to identify an association between severity of ossification and different arthroplasty approaches.

A comparison of cemented femoral fixation via anterior versus posterior approach total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of 60,739 total hip arthroplasties.

Anterior approach total hip arthroplasty (THA) decreases the rate of dislocation but increases femoral-sided complications in the way of periprosthetic fractures and component loosening. A cemented prosthesis may reduce femoral-sided complications and improve the risk:benefit profile of anterior approach THA. Data from the Australian National Joint Replacement Registry were analysed for patients undergoing primary THA via the anterior or posterior approach using a cemented polished femoral stem from January 2015 to December 2021. The primary outcome measure was the cumulative percent revision (CPR) for all causes and CPR for femoral component loosening and fracture. The CPR for the primary outcome measures were compared between the anterior and posterior approach and adjusted for age, sex, ASA score, BMI and femoral head size. The study included 60,739 THAs with cemented stems (10,742 anterior, 49,997 posterior). The rate of revision of the anterior versus the posterior approach did not significantly differ (HR 0.87 (95% CI, 0.74-1.03), p = 0.100). Anterior approach THA had a significantly higher rate of revision for femoral component loosening (HR 5.06 [95% CI, 3.08-8.30], p < 0.001); and a decreased rate of revision for infection (HR 0.59 [95% CI, 0.43-0.81], p = 0.001) and dislocation/instability (HR 0-3 months 0.48 [95% CI, 0.27-0.83], p = 0.008; HR >3 months 0.30 [95% CI, 0.15-0.61], p < 0.001). There was no difference in the rate of revision surgery for fracture between the 2 approaches (HR 1.01 [95% CI, 0.71-1.43]), p = 0.975). There is no significant difference in overall revision rates with cemented femoral fixation performed with an anterior or posterior approach. Cemented fixation performed with the anterior approach partly mitigates femoral complications with no difference in the revision rate for fracture but an increased rate of femoral component loosening.

Extended offset stems are infrequently required in anterior approach total hip arthroplasty and low usage does not compromise stability.

Extended offset (EO) stems are commonly used in posterior approach (PA) total hip arthroplasty (THA), but usage rates and complications are not well studied with anterior approach (AA) THA. This study evaluated usage rates, radiographic outcomes and complications following AA THA between patients receiving EO stems and a matched cohort receiving standard offset (SO) stems. This retrospective review evaluated 1515 consecutive AA THA performed between 2014 and 2021. The recent 100 EO were included in radiographic and complication analysis and were matched to 100 SO stems based on stem size, procedure (unilateral/bilateral), sex, body mass index (BMI), and age. Data collection included patient demographics; pre- and postoperative radiographic measurements of leg length difference (LLD) and global hip offset difference (GHOD); and complications within 1year. Independent t-tests and Chi-squared analyses compared EO and SO groups. EO was utilized in 8% of all AA THA. Despite matching procedures, the distribution of racial groups was different between EO and SO groups, respectively: Caucasian (75% vs. 43%), Asian (12% vs. 35%), Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (NHPI) (9% vs. 13%), and other (4% vs. 9%) (p < 0.001). No fractures, dislocations, or revisions occurred within 1year after surgery in either group. One deep infection was noted in the SO group. The proportions of patients following surgery who had a GHOD < 6mm (76% vs. 82%; p = 0.193) and LLD < 6mm (81% vs. 86%; p = 0.223) were not significantly different between EO and SO groups, respectively. Prioritizing hip symmetry over stability results in a high proportion of patients achieving hip symmetry without high usage of EO stems in AA THA. Furthermore, low use of EO stems did not result in increased dislocations. Due to racial anatomical differences, Caucasian patients required EO stems to achieve hip symmetry more frequently than Asian and NHPI patients.

Magnetic resonance imaging of femoral nerve injury in the setting of anterior approach total hip arthroplasty

PurposeTo illustrate MRI findings in patients with femoral neuropathy following anterior approach total hip arthroplasty (THA). MethodsThis was a retrospective review of patients who underwent MRI for femoral neuropathy following anterior approach THA between January 1, 2010, and July 1, 2022. Included patients had no preexisting neurologic condition. Clinical and diagnostic data were collected. MRIs were reviewed in consensus by 2 musculoskeletal radiologists. ResultsA total of 115 patient records were reviewed, 17 of which were included in the final analysis (mean age 64 years; 11 females). Study subjects presented with weakness with hip flexion and knee extension and pain and numbness in the femoral nerve distribution. In 7 subjects, the femoral nerve appeared normal. In 5 subjects, the femoral nerve was hyperintense on fluid-sensitive fat-suppressed imaging. In 4 patients, mass effect on the femoral nerve by either ill-defined soft tissue edema (n = 2), seroma (n = 1), or heterotopic ossification (n = 1) was detected. Only 1 patient had a nerve transection. Patients were imaged at a median time of 8 months (range: 1 day to 11 years) following arthroplasty placement. Clinical follow-up was available in 8 patients, of whom half had complete symptomatic resolution and half had partial improvement at a mean follow-up time of 39.3 months (SD 51.1). Of these 8, 1 underwent revision arthroplasty, 1 had removal of hardware, and another had excision of heterotopic ossification. ConclusionMRI provides a means to directly evaluate the femoral nerve following anterior approach THA in both the immediate and chronic postoperative periods.

Functional Acetabular Component Positioning During Direct Anterior Approach Hip Arthroplasty Using a Novel Three-Dimensional Virtual Mesh Imaging System With Fluoroscopy

BackgroundOptimal position of total hip arthroplasty (THA) components is critical for joint mechanics and stability. Acetabular component positioning during supine surgery in direct anterior approach (DAA) THA may be different in the standing position postoperatively, which traditional fluoroscopy is unable to predict. A novel 3-dimensional (3D) image analysis technology (IAT) that uses artificial intelligence to measure the tilt and rotation of the pelvis has enabled prediction of component positioning from supine to standing. The purpose of this study was to compare intraoperative fluoroscopy, non–3D-IAT, and 3D-IAT with postoperative standing radiographs to assess the accuracy of component positioning. MethodsFrom 2022 to 2023, 30 consecutive patients (86.6% women, mean age 59 [range, 55 to 67]) undergoing primary DAA THA with the use of the 3D-IAT were identified. A separate cohort of 148 patients from 2020 to 2021 (85% women, mean age 65 [range, 55 to 69]) who underwent DAA THA with non–3D-IAT was used for comparison. Leg length discrepancy (LLD), cup anteversion, and inclination were manually measured on intraoperative fluoroscopic images and digitally measured using IAT. Follow-up evaluation occurred at 1 month with standing pelvis radiographs measured using Ein Bild Röntgen Analyze–Cup software. Measurements were compared via Wilcoxon signed rank tests where P ≤ .05 indicates significantly different measurements. ResultsMedian LLD, inclination, and anteversion measurements via non–3D-IAT and fluoroscopy were significantly different compared to postoperative standing radiographs (P < .001). The 3D-IAT more accurately predicted LLD, abduction, and anteversion, with values not significantly different from postoperative standing measurements (P = .23, P = .93, and P = .36, respectively). ConclusionsThe use of the 3D-IAT during DAA THA allowed for the more accurate prediction of acetabular component position in the standing position postoperatively.

Changing practice to a new-generation triple-taper collared femoral component reduces periprosthetic fracture rates after primary total hip arthroplasty.

Periprosthetic femoral fracture (PPF) is a major complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Uncemented femoral components are widely preferred in primary THA, but are associated with higher PPF risk than cemented components. Collared components have reduced PPF rates following uncemented primary THA compared to collarless components, while maintaining similar prosthetic designs. The purpose of this study was to analyze PPF rate between collarless and collared component designs in a consecutive cohort of posterior approach THAs performed by two high-volume surgeons. This retrospective series included 1,888 uncemented primary THAs using the posterior approach performed by two surgeons (PKS, JMV) from January 2016 to December 2022. Both surgeons switched from collarless to collared components in mid-2020, which was the only change in surgical practice. Data related to component design, PPF rate, and requirement for revision surgery were collected. A total of 1,123 patients (59.5%) received a collarless femoral component and 765 (40.5%) received a collared component. PPFs were identified using medical records and radiological imaging. Fracture rates between collared and collarless components were analyzed. Power analysis confirmed 80% power of the sample to detect a significant difference in PPF rates, and a Fisher's exact test was performed to determine an association between collared and collarless component use on PPF rates. Overall, 17 PPFs occurred (0.9%). There were 16 fractures out of 1,123 collarless femoral components (1.42%) and one fracture out of 765 collared components (0.13%; p = 0.002). The majority of fractures (n = 14; 82.4%) occurred within 90 days of primary THA. There were ten reoperations for PPF with collarless components (0.89%) and one reoperation with a collared component (0.13%; p = 0.034). Collared femoral components were associated with significant decreases in PPF rate and reoperation rate for PPF compared to collarless components in uncemented primary THA. Future studies should investigate whether new-generation collared components reduce PPF rates with longer-term follow-up.

Reverse Fragility Index: Comparing Revision Rates Between Direct Anterior and Other Approaches in Total Hip Arthroplasty. A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

BackgroundDespite increasing adoption of the direct anterior (DA) approach in total hip arthroplasty (THA), uncertainty persists regarding its outcomes beyond the 1-year mark in comparison to other approaches. We used the reverse fragility index (RFI) to evaluate the robustness of reported findings in the literature. MethodsWe conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing implant revision rates between DA and other approaches in THA, defined as all those different from DA. Our primary outcome was the RFI, which gauges the number of events needed for a nonsignificant result to become significant, in the revision rate between DA and other approaches. We also calculated the reverse fragility quotient by dividing the RFI by each study’s sample size. Median values and interquartile ranges (IQRs) were displayed. ResultsA total of 10 RCTs with a total of 971 patients were included. The median RFI was 5 (IQR, 4 to 5), indicating the study’s results would be statistically significant if the outcomes of 5 patients in 1 treatment arm were reversed. The median reverse fragility quotient was 0.049 (IQR, 0.04 to 0.057), indicating that a change of outcome in 4.9% of patients would render the revision rate significant. The median number of patients lost to follow-up was 4 (IQR, 0 to 7). Of the 10 RCTs, 6 had more patients lost to follow-up than their respective RFI values. ConclusionsNotable fragility was evidenced in most studies comparing DA to other approaches for THA. Surgeons should not solely rely on the P value to determine clinical significance and instead use multiple metrics. Level of evidenceII.

Instability in Patients With Lumbar Spine Disease Undergoing Posterior Approach and Lateral Approach Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Dislocation rates in patients who have fixed spinopelvic motion have been reported up to 20%. Few studies have directly compared dislocation rates in patients who have spine pathology undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) through different surgical approaches. This study compared postoperative dislocation rates in patients who had lumbar spine disease and underwent primary THA using a posterior or direct lateral approach. Between 2011 and 2017, consecutive cohorts of primary THAs were retrospectively reviewed. One surgeon routinely used a posterior approach, while the other used a direct lateral approach. Chart and radiographic review were conducted to identify patients who had lumbar spine disease. Dislocations among cohorts with and without lumbar spine disease were compared by posterior and direct lateral approaches. The overall dislocation rate was 1.3% (15/1,198). The top four predictors of dislocation were presence of lumbar spine disease (odds ratio [OR] 5.0; P = 0.014), posterior surgical approach (OR, 6.5; P = 0.074), cases performed for fracture (OR, 4.4; P = 0.035), and women (OR, 4.6; P = 0.050). Dislocation rates among direct lateral approach patients who had lumbar spine pathology were significantly lower than posterior approach patients who had lumbar spine pathology (0.0% versus 3.6%; P = 0.011). Although dislocation rates were low in both groups, study results suggest that a direct lateral approach for primary THA may reduce postoperative dislocations for patients who have limited spinopelvic motion due to lumbar spine pathology. Furthermore, surgeons using the posterior approach might consider optimizing the femoral head to acetabular cup ratio in patients who have lumbar spine disease.

MACHINE LEARNING CAN PREDICT DIFFICULTY IN ANTERIOR APPROACH TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY TO IMPROVE PATIENT SAFETY AND SURGICAL TRAINING

Anterior approach total hip arthroplasty (AA-THA) has a steep learning curve, with higher complication rates in initial cases. Proper surgical case selection during the learning curve can reduce early risk. This study aims to identify patient and radiographic factors associated with AA-THA difficulty using Machine Learning (ML).Consecutive primary AA-THA patients from two centres, operated by two expert surgeons, were enrolled (excluding patients with prior hip surgery and first 100 cases per surgeon). K- means prototype clustering – an unsupervised ML algorithm – was used with two variables - operative duration and surgical complications within 6 weeks - to cluster operations into difficult or standard groups.Radiographic measurements (neck shaft angle, offset, LCEA, inter-teardrop distance, Tonnis grade) were measured by two independent observers. These factors, alongside patient factors (BMI, age, sex, laterality) were employed in a multivariate logistic regression analysis and used for k-means clustering. Significant continuous variables were investigated for predictive accuracy using Receiver Operator Characteristics (ROC).Out of 328 THAs analyzed, 130 (40%) were classified as difficult and 198 (60%) as standard. Difficult group had a mean operative time of 106mins (range 99–116) with 2 complications, while standard group had a mean operative time of 77mins (range 69–86) with 0 complications. Decreasing inter-teardrop distance (odds ratio [OR] 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.95–0.99, p = 0.03) and right-sided operations (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.10–2.72, p = 0.02) were associated with operative difficulty. However, ROC analysis showed poor predictive accuracy for these factors alone, with area under the curve of 0.56. Inter-observer reliability was reported as excellent (ICC &gt;0.7).Right-sided hips (for right-hand dominant surgeons) and decreasing inter-teardrop distance were associated with case difficulty in AA-THA. These data could guide case selection during the learning phase. A larger dataset with more complications may reveal further factors.

Does Approach Matter in Robotic-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Comparison of Early Reoperations Between Direct Anterior and Postero-Lateral Approach

BackgroundThere is no consensus on whether direct anterior approach (DAA) or postero-lateral approach (PLA) total hip arthroplasty (THA) confers a lower risk of postoperative complications. Robotic assistance in THA results in a more consistently accurate component position compared to manual THA. The objective of this study was to compare rates of dislocation, reoperation, revision, and patient-reported outcome measures between patients undergoing DAA and PLA robotic-assisted primary THA. MethodsWe identified 2,040 consecutive robotic-assisted primary THAs performed for primary osteoarthritis, using DAA (n = 497) or PLA (n = 1,542) between 2017 and 2020. The mean follow-up was 18 months. Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated survivorship free of dislocation, reoperation, and revision. Achievement of patient acceptable symptom state and minimum clinically important difference were used to compare changes in the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement (HOOS JR) and Visual Analog Scale. ResultsDislocation was rare in this series (14 in 2,040, 0.7%), including 1 of 497 (0.2%) in the DAA cohort and 13 of 1,542 (0.8%) in the PLA cohort (P = .210). There was no difference in 2-year reoperation-free survivorship (97.8 versus 98.6%, P = .59) or revision-free survivorship (98.8 versus 99.0%, P = .87) at any time point. After controlling for age, sex, and body mass index, there was no difference in dislocation, reoperation, or revision. At 6-week follow-up, after controlling for age, sex, and body mass index, patients in the DAA cohort had higher odds of achieving HOOS JR minimum clinically important difference (odds ratio = 2.01, P = .012) and HOOS JR patient acceptable symptom state (odds ratio = 1.72, P = .028). There were no differences in patient-reported outcome measures by 3 months. ConclusionsFor robotic-assisted primary THA, DAA may confer enhanced early (<6 weeks) functional recovery compared to the PLA, but there was no significant difference in postoperative dislocation, reoperation, or revision rates.

Fluoroscopy Versus Imageless Optical Navigation in Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Utilization of the direct anterior approach (DAA) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) has risen in popularity. Accurate implant placement is a critical factor that influences patient outcomes. The goal of this study was to compare the accuracy and precision of fluoroscopy with imageless optical navigation in DAA THA. This was a cohort study of 640 consecutive primary DAA THAs performed with intraoperative fluoroscopy (n = 300 patients) or imageless optical navigation (n = 304 patients). Accuracy was compared by measuring acetabular cup inclination, anteversion, and leg-length discrepancy (LLD). The proportion of implants placed within the Lewinnek safe zone and those placed within a more precise target of 40 ± 5° inclination and 20 ± 5° anteversion was evaluated. According to the Lewinnek criteria, there was no difference in the percentage of implants placed within both inclination and anteversion targets (fluoroscopy: 90.3%; navigation: 88.8%, P = 0.519). Using the more precise targets, navigation increased the implants positioned correctly for both inclination and anteversion (fluoroscopy: 50.3%; navigation: 65.6%, P < 0.001). Navigation increased the proportion of implants positioned within the target anteversion zone (fluoroscopy: 71.3%; navigation: 83.8%, P < 0.001) but not inclination (fluoroscopy: 71.9%; navigation: 76.9%, P = 0.147). The mean LLD was higher with the use of fluoroscopy compared with navigation (5.5 mm, standard deviation: 4.1; 4.6 mm, SD: 3.4, P < 0.005). No difference in dislocation rate was observed ( P = 0.643). Both fluoroscopy and imageless optical navigation demonstrated accurate acetabular implant positioning during DAA THA. Navigation was more precise and associated with improved acetabular anteversion placement and restoration of LLD. Navigation is an accurate alternative to fluoroscopy with decreased radiation exposure.

The effect of intraoperative fluoroscopy on acetabular component positioning and patient anatomy restoration during posterior or posterolateral approach total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Positioning implant components and restoring patient anatomy during total hip arthroplasty (THA) are essential for joint stability, polyethylene liner wear, and range of motion. Previous studies comparing intraoperative fluoroscopy with no fluoroscopy during the posterior or posterolateral approach have reported conflicting results. This meta-analysis evaluated if intraoperative fluoroscopy improves component positioning and femoral component position compared to no fluoroscopy during posterior or posterolateral approach total hip arthroplasty. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses standards were followed when conducting the systematic review. We searched Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Cochrane Library, Highwire, CBM, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang database in May 2023 to identify studies involving Intraoperative fluoroscopy versus no fluoroscopy during posterior or posterolateral approach total hip arthroplasty. Finally, we identified 1133 patients (1145 hips) assessed in seven studies. There were no significant differences in terms of acetabular cup inclination angle (ACIA, P = 0.43), ACIA within safe zone rate (P = 0.58), acetabular cup anteversion angle (ACAA, P = 0.46); ACAA within safe zone rate (P = 0.72), Combined safe zone rate (P = 0.28), dislocation rate (P = 0.64) and infection rate (P = 0.94) between two groups. Compared with the no fluoroscopy group, the intraoperative fluoroscopy group had more operation time (P < 0.00001), less femoral component offset difference (FCOD, P = 0.03), and less LLD (P < 0.00001). Even though intraoperative fluoroscopy was not related to an improvement in cup location or dislocation incidence. Our findings demonstrate that the restoration of leg lengths and femoral offset can be significantly improved by using intraoperative fluoroscopy to supplement good surgical skills in THA. The advantages of intraoperative fluoroscopy might become more apparent for surgeons with less experience. To ascertain whether intraoperative fluoroscopy for posterior or posterolateral approach total hip arthroplasty will have clinical benefits and improve the survival of prostheses, more well-powered and well-designed long-term follow-up studies were necessary.

Defining the Learning Period of a Novel Imageless Navigation System for Posterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty: Analysis of Surgical Time and Accuracy.

The use of imageless navigation in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is frequently associated with prolonged surgical times, predominantly during the learning period. The purpose of the present study was to characterize the learning period of a novel imageless navigation system, specifically as it related to surgical time and acetabular navigation accuracy. This was a retrospective observational study of a consecutive group of 158 patients who underwent primary unilateral THA for osteoarthritis by a team headed by a single surgeon. All procedures used an imageless navigation system to measure acetabular cup inclination and anteversion angles, referencing a generic sagittal and frontal plane. Navigation accuracy was determined by assessing differences between intraoperative inclination and anteversion values and those obtained from standardized 6-week follow-up radiographs. Operative time and navigation accuracy were assessed by plotting moving averages of 7 consecutive cases. The learning period was defined using Mann-Kendall trend analyses, student t-tests and nonlinear regression modeling based on surgical time and navigation accuracy. Alpha error was 0.05. The average surgical time was 67.3min (SD:9.2) (range 45-95). The average navigation accuracy for inclination was 0.01° (SD:4.2) (range - 10 to 10), and that for anteversion was - 4.9° (SD:3.8) (range - 14 to 5). Average surgical time and navigation accuracy were similar between the first and final cases in the series with no learning period detected. There was no discernible learning period effect on surgical time or system measurement accuracy during the early phases of adoption for this imageless navigation system.

Major complications after total hip arthroplasty with the direct anterior approach at a high-volume Ontario tertiary care centre.

The rate of major surgical complications for high-volume orthopedic surgeons using the direct anterior approach (DAA) in Ontario, Canada, is not known. The purpose of this study was to investigate the rate of major surgical complications after total hip arthroplasty (THA) using DAA performed by experienced orthopedic surgeons at a high-volume tertiary care centre in Ontario. We conducted a retrospective cohort review of primary THA through DAA performed by 2 experienced fellowship-trained surgeons at an academic hospital in London, Ontario, between Jan. 1, 2012, and May 1, 2019. We excluded the first 100 cases to allow for surgeon learning curves. We recorded major surgical complications (intraoperative events, postoperative periprosthetic fractures, dislocation requiring closed or open reduction, implant failure [aseptic loosening or subsidence], early (< 6 wk) deep wound infection requiring irrigation and débridement, late (≥ 6 wk) deep wound infection requiring irrigation and débridement, and wound complications [wound dehiscence, stitch abscess, erythema, hematoma or seroma]) within 1 year of THA. A total of 875 primary DAA THA procedures were included. The rates of surgical complications were 0.9% for intraoperative events, 1.5% for postoperative periprosthetic fractures, 0.8% for implant failure, 0.7% for early deep wound infection, 0.1% for late deep wound infection and 3.2% for wound complications; there were no cases of dislocation. The rate of revision for implant failure within 1 year was 0.1%. Male sex was associated with a greater risk of implant failure (p = 0.01), and having a higher body mass index was associated with both increased rates of infection (p < 0.01) and having a wound complication (p < 0.01). Intraoperative events, postoperative periprosthetic fractures, implant failure, deep wound infection and wound complications accounted for the major surgical complications within 1 year of THA through DAA. The low revision rate suggests that DAA is a safe approach for THA.

Fluoroscopy-guided direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty provides more accurate component positions in the supine position than in the lateral position

PurposeThe position of the acetabular and femoral components is critical for stability and wear resistance. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the fluoroscopy-guided direct anterior approach in the supine position (S-DAA) is more helpful in improving the position of acetabular and femoral components than the fluoroscopy-guided direct anterior approach in the lateral decubitus position (L-DAA).MethodsA retrospective analysis of 76 cases of fluoroscopy-guided direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty (38 cases in the S-DAA and 38 cases in the L-DAA group) was performed in one hospital from 2019 to 2021. The differences in inclination, anteversion, femoral offset (FO), global offset (GO), and leg length discrepancy (LLD) measurements during and after surgery were analyzed. The postoperative femoral offset (FO), global offset (GO), leg length discrepancy (LLD), and preoperative and postoperative Harris hip score were compared between the two groups.ResultsIn the S-DAA group, there were no significant differences in the mean intraoperative inclination angle anteversion angle, FO, GO, and LLD compared to the postoperative values, whereas in the L-DAA group, there were significant differences between the intraoperative and postoperative measurements (P < 0.001, P = 0.009, P＜0.001, P＜0.001 and P = 0.008, respectively). Additionally, there were significant differences in the accuracy of LLD, FO, and GO between the two groups (P < 0.001). Compared with the L-DAA group, the average differences of inclination, anteversion, LLD, FO, and GO during and after operation in the S-DAA group were smaller, and the consistency was higher. There was a significant difference in Harris hip score between the two groups at 1 week after surgery (P = 0.033). There was no significant difference in Harris hip score between 1 month and 3 months after surgery (P = 0.482 and P = 0.797, respectively).ConclusionsIn the supine group, the direct anterior approach (DAA) provides more accurate positioning of the acetabular and femoral components. However, there was no significant difference in hip joint function and activity between the two groups at follow-up.