In 1974, an article in Harper’s Magazine declared that “[i]f things go on as they are, Boise [Idaho] stands an excellent chance of becoming the first American city to have deliberately eradicated itself.” At the time, Boise had decided to try its hand at urban renewal, just as many other cities were abandoning the federally-funded destruction of American downtowns. In Boise, the map of “blighted” properties to be torn down approximated half of each of the 50 blocks of the city’s downtown. Disinvestment in the urban core followed the plan’s release leaving a hollowed-out core and a bleak future for the city. The Harper’s article described the scene: “[O]n a recent warm, bright Tuesday morning — perfect shopper’s weather — a cannonball, if fired the length of the sidewalk” along the “principal canyon of trade along Idaho Street,” “would have struck exactly nineteen people.” How times have changed. In 2017, the U.S. Census declared Boise the fastest-growing city in America. In 2020, Meridian and Nampa, two of Boise’s suburban communities, were named among the ten fastest-growing cities in the United States. In 2021, Zillow announced that Idaho was the state with the highest home price appreciation in the decade between 2010 and 2020. Almost all of that appreciation came in the Boise metropolitan region, which Zillow noted saw a jaw-dropping appreciation of “over three times” in that decade. Despite the enormity of the change in Boise, its growth is very similar to growth seen by other cities in the Intermountain West over the last century. Boise should be able to learn from the mistakes of those cities that have gone before it and plan in advance for growth. But will Boise do so? The article explores both the ways that Boise's growth is unique to its remote location, but also how the city is emblematic of many other fast-growth cities. Such fast growth cities have the potential to dramatically affect the externalities of development before they occur, but such cities routinely fail to seize these opportunities because of political objections to regulation and lack of institutional knowledge in its governmental processes. Can Boise change that trajectory? And if not, under what circumstances can we expect planning to make a difference? The article offers an approach forward.
Read full abstract