Quality Appraisal Research Articles

Providers’ perspective on vaginal birth after cesarean birth: a qualitative systematic review

Abstract Background Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Birth (VBAC) is a birth mode recommended for reducing repeat cesarean which potentially contributes to adverse outcomes. However, VBAC is not normally practiced in some countries. Providers are an important part of the decision-making process on modes of birth among pregnant individuals. Providers’ perspective on VBAC can influence whether they support or avoid conducting VBAC. This review aimed to explore providers’ perspective on VBAC. Methods The comprehensive search was conducted from six databases including PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google scholar. The studies published in English between 2013 and 2023 were review. The Medical Subject Heading terms for VBAC and perspective were used to search. The eligible studies were selected by the PRISMA flow chart. The initial search yielded 558 articles. After excluding duplicates, articles not retrieved for full-text, and not meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria, eight articles were recruited. Quality appraisal of the studies was performed by the tool of the Joanna Briggs Institute. The meta-aggregation approach was applied to synthesize the findings. Results Eight qualitative articles were included in this review, and six themes were developed including (1) different recognition of VBAC, (2) differences of willingness level of conducting Trial of Labor after Cesarean (TOLAC) (the approach attempting to have VBAC), (3) skills and resources needed when performing TOLAC, (4) protocol for recruiting candidacy and TOLAC management, (5) final decision making on VBAC, and (6) onset and duration of providing TOLAC information. Conclusion Providers play an important role in influencing individuals’ decision on modes of birth. Providers’ positive recognition and willingness of conducting TOLAC potentially impact successful VBAC rate. However, the lawsuit caused by adverse outcomes from TOLAC/VBAC is a main reason for choosing repeat cesarean. Trial registration PROSPERO registration number of this systematic review: CRD42023427662.

Machine learning models including patient-reported outcome data in oncology: a systematic literature review and analysis of their reporting quality.

To critically examine the current state of machine learning (ML) models including patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) scores in cancer research, by investigating the reporting quality of currently available studies and proposing areas of improvement for future use of ML in the field. PubMed and Web of Science were systematically searched for publications of studies on patients with cancer applying ML models with PROM scores as either predictors or outcomes. The reporting quality of applied ML models was assessed utilizing an adapted version of the MI-CLAIM (Minimum Information about CLinical Artificial Intelligence Modelling) checklist. The key variables of the checklist are study design, data preparation, model development, optimization, performance, and examination. Reproducibility and transparency complement the reporting quality criteria. The literature search yielded 1634 hits, of which 52 (3.2%) were eligible. Thirty-six (69.2%) publications included PROM scores as a predictor and 32 (61.5%) as an outcome. Results of the reporting quality appraisal indicate a potential for improvement, especially in the areas of model examination. According to the standards of the MI-CLAIM checklist, the reporting quality of ML models in included studies proved to be low. Only nine (17.3%) publications present a discussion about the clinical applicability of the developed model and reproducibility and only three (5.8%) provide a code to reproduce the model and the results. The herein performed critical examination of the status quo of the application of ML models including PROM scores in published oncological studies allowed the identification of areas of improvement for reporting and future use of ML in the field.

APOE ε4 and Dietary Patterns in Relation to Cognitive Function: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews.

Carrying the apolipoprotein ε4 allele (APOE ε4) is the strongest genetic risk factor for late-onset Alzheimer's disease. There is some evidence suggesting that APOE ε4 may modulate the influence of diet on cognitive function. This umbrella review of systematic reviews evaluates the existing literature on the effect of dietary interventions on cognitive and brain-imaging outcomes by APOE status. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched using terms appropriate to each area of research, from their respective starting dates of coverage until March 2023. Two independent reviewers conducted data extraction and performed a quality appraisal using the Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2. Six total reviews were included in the final analysis. Four reviews evaluated randomized controlled trials on individuals aged 50-93 years ranging the entire cognitive continuum. One review combined observational studies and clinical trials conducted on both cognitively healthy and cognitively impaired individuals (age range: 50-90), and 1 review included observational studies of both cognitively healthy and cognitively impaired adults (age range: 50-75). Both observational studies and clinical trials yielded inconclusive results attributed to both practical limitations associated with longitudinal follow-up and issues of methodological quality. Except for the Mediterranean diet, dietary interventions, such as the ketogenic diet, nutraceuticals, and supplements, were generally not effective in older APOE ε4 carriers. This review considers plausible biological mechanisms that might explain why older and cognitively impaired APOE ε4 carriers were less likely to benefit. This review identifies notable gaps in the literature, such as a shortage of studies conducted in middle-aged and cognitively healthy APOE ε4 carriers assessing the impact of dietary interventions and provides suggestions for novel trial designs.

Cannabinoids for obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review.

Cannabinoids have emerged as a potential treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). This systematic review aimed to summarize the efficacy and safety of cannabinoids to treat OSA. Databases including Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, PsycINFO, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts were searched; experimental and observational studies were eligible for inclusion. One-hundred seventy unique records were screened, and nine studies included: five full-text studies and four published abstracts. The five full-text studies were judged for quality appraisal: two studies deemed at low risk for bias, one study deemed to have some concerns for bias, and two studies deemed to have high risk for bias. Seven of nine total studies were experimental designs and evaluated dronabinol, and the other two studies were observational designs evaluating cannabis. The range of cannabinoid therapy duration spanned from 1 to 6 weeks, and the median duration was 3 weeks. Eight of nine total studies reported statistically significant, positive OSA outcomes due to cannabinoid therapy including reductions in the apnea hypopnea index and improvements in patient-reported daytime sleepiness scales. Between 70% and 80% of study participants reported neuropsychiatric and gastrointestinal adverse events attributable to cannabinoids. The American Academy of Sleep Medicine does not recommend using cannabinoids to treat OSA due to a lack of long-term safety and efficacy data. This systematic review found similar limitations, with the median cannabinoid treatment duration being only 3 weeks. Adequately powered experimental trials over longer time frames are necessary to more completely assess the long-term efficacy and safety of cannabinoids in the treatment of OSA and its effects on common comorbid conditions, such as obesity and cardiovascular disease.

Experiences of Nurses Speaking Up in Healthcare Settings: A Qualitative Metasynthesis.

To systematically review and synthesise qualitative research on nurses' experiences of speaking up in various contexts and to identify factors facilitating or impeding such a behaviour. This review was conducted as a qualitative metasynthesis, utilising the qualitative meta-ethnography approach. A total of 6250 articles were screened. Two reviewers screened titles, abstracts and full texts. A total of 15 studies were included in this review. Researchers conducted a quality appraisal using the JBI critical appraisal checklist for qualitative research. An a priori protocol was created and registered on the Open Science Framework. Literature searches were conducted in five international bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global) and five Korean databases (RISS, KISS, DBpia, KCI and NDSL). Three main themes were identified from the 15 studies used in the metasynthesis: (1) decisional complexity of speaking up, (2) motivators for speaking up and (3) barriers to speaking up. Nurses experienced challenges in speaking up. They were, and continue to be, concerned about negative responses. Hierarchy structure and poor work environment were identified as barriers to speaking up; professional responsibility and a supportive atmosphere were identified as facilitators for speaking up. This review synthesised nurses' experiences of speaking up and influencing factors. Speaking up is crucial for nurses to improve patient safety, as frontline nurses are ideally positioned to observe early indicators of unsafe conditions in healthcare delivery. Identified motivators and barriers of nurses' speaking-up behaviour offer considerations and opportunities for healthcare leaders and managers. This could lead to improvement in patient safety through the establishment of a safety culture that facilitates nurses' speaking-up behaviour. The review adhered to the ENTREQ guideline. No patient or public contribution has been made in this review.

Fear of the Cancer Coming Back: A Metasynthesis of Fear of Recurrence in Breast Cancer.

This review aimed to consolidate existing knowledge on this phenomenon by incorporating direct testimonies from individuals who have experienced breast cancer. A thorough metasynthesis of qualitative studies was conducted. English articles published prior to September 18 2023 were searched from eight databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, the Chinese biomedical literature service system, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, the Wanfang Database, and the Wipu Database. After screening the titles, abstracts, and full texts, six articles were finally included in the quality appraisal and metaaggregation. A total of 30 research findings were distilled and integrated into three themes: causes of fear of cancer recurrence (FCR); feelings of FCR; coping with FCR; and six subthemes: disease treatment factors; psychological factors; FCR is worry and fear; overcoming; negative response; positive response. FCR is a subjective feeling; it is influenced by the interplay between the external environment (adjuvant therapy) and internal environment (psychological factors). Therefore, future care measures should be designed comprehensively, considering the individual characteristics of breast cancer survivors and the external environment. This could be the primary focus for addressing FCR in cancer patients in the future.

Breast cancer and its determinants in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer morbidity and mortality among women. Still, there is a paucity of studies to know the magnitude of the problem in Ethiopia. Hence, this review was intended to pool the prevalence and identify the determinants of breast cancer in Ethiopia. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. Databases like PubMed/MEDLINE, HINARI, Science Direct, and Google Scholar, as well as websites of organisationsI organizations,rewere searched between 25 February and 6 March 2023. All observational studies in Ethiopia that reported either the magnitude and/or determinants of breast cancer regardless of publication status were included. Two authors independently assessed and extracted the data. The Joanna Briggs Institute meta-analysis of statistics assessment and review instrument quality appraisal tool was used to assess the quality of the articles. Effect estimates were done by using the random-effects model. The meta-analysis results were displayed by using forest plots. Seventeen articles were reviewed with 24 435 total participants. The pooled proportion of breast cancer morbidity among patients with cancer was 20. 58% (95% CI 17.25%, 23.90%) in Ethiopia. Consuming packed foods (POR=2.12, 95% CI 1.41, 3.17), presence of high cholesterol (POR=4.08; 95% CI 2.75, 6.07), physical inactivity (POR=3.27; 95% CI 1.80, 5.94), high body mass index (BMI) (POR=2.27; 95% CI 0.85, 6.03), postmenopause (POR=2.25; 95% CI 1.63, 3.10), family history of cancer (POR=3.65; 95% CI 0.85, 15.71) and lack of breastfeeding (POR=2.76; 95% CI 0.90, 7.92) were the determinants of breast cancer. One of five patients with cancer is diagnosed with breast cancer in Ethiopia. Furthermore, more than a quarter of women with cancer suffer from breast cancer. Processed food consumption, high cholesterol in the body, lack of physical activity, high BMI, postmenopause, family history of cancer and lack of breastfeeding were the risk factors for breast cancer. The use of healthy food sources such as fruits and vegetables, and homegrown varieties of crops rather than seeking processed foods would help. CRD42023417733.

Early Hearing Detection and Intervention programmes for neonates, infants and children in non-Asian low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review.

Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) programmes were established to reduce the impact of hearing loss on children. High-income countries (HICs) have resources and knowledge to execute these programmes. However, financial and other resource constraints limit the availability of these programmes to low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Yet, LMICs have explored strategies to implement EHDI programmes in their context; the outcomes are still largely unknown.The aim of this study is to identify the various models of the EHDI program implemented in non-Asian LMICs. METHOD: Studies published between 2010 and 2023 reporting EHDI programmes in non-Asian LMICs for children were considered. The primary databases searched were PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EBSCOHost, EBSCO-CINAHL and ProQuest dissertations. The search results are summarised using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses chart. Quality appraisal and risk-of-bias assessment were assessed. Using the retrieved data, a narrative synthesis of the identified methods and forest plots for the prevalence estimate was created. Fifty-six studies from 16 LMICs were included. They were grouped into 29 hearing screening programmes for neonates and infants and 26 programmes for older children. Predominantly hospital-based screening was employed for neonates and infants and school-based screening for older children. Two-stage otoacoustic emissions screening was employed for neonates and infants, while single-stage pure tone audiometry with otoscopy screening was used for older children. Predominantly, audiologists performed screening and diagnostics for neonates/infants while community health workers performed screening for the older children. Screening aspects were reported predominantly and not diagnostic evaluation/intervention outcomes. Overall, the economics of EHDI was reported only anecdotally in a few studies. The screening strategies were not uniform among non-Asian LMICs. The protocols used were similar to HICs, yet few developed protocols adapting the Joint Committee of Infant Hearing. However, long-term outcomes such as rate of identification, suitable intervention and their outcomes are not known. EHDI programmes with successful outcomes of early intervention must be studied and reported with economic evaluations.

Interventional Strategies to Mitigate Maternal Stress and Enhance Coping Skills During Neonatal Admission Into Intensive Care Units in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review.

Mothers of high-risk neonates experience tremendous stress during neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. This stress has a negative impact on mothers' participation in neonatal care activities, psychological health and coping skills in the NICU. To determine the impact of interventional strategies to reduce maternal stress and enhance coping skills during neonatal admission to the NICU. A scoping review was carried out following the methodological framework outlined by Arksey and O'Malley. This scoping review was conducted as per the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines, including a quality appraisal checklist for randomised and nonrandomised controlled trials. Patterns, advances, gaps, evidence for practice and research recommendations from the review (PAGER framework) were used to report the results. The following international databases were used to search for primary articles: Medline via PubMed, EBSCOhost via CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science and the ProQuest Medical Library. Original studies published in English between January 2011 and January 2023 from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) that assessed maternal stress and coping skills during neonatal NICU admission were included in the review. The review included 15 articles from LMICs, of which 60% were from middle-income, 25% were from lower-middle-income and 15% were from low-income countries. Interventional strategies were described under five categories. Maternal stress decreased significantly across all three subscales of the PSPS: 'sight and sound', 'baby looks and behavior' and 'parental relationship with baby and role alteration' during neonatal NICU admission. Interventional strategies involving family-centred care and emotional and psychological supportive care have been reported to have a consistently positive impact on alleviating maternal stress and enhancing coping skills in the NICU. Healthcare professionals, especially nurses, are pivotal in promptly recognising maternal stress and NICU stressors. The participation of mothers in neonatal care, such as through family-centred care and emotional support interventions, significantly reduces maternal stress and enhances coping skills.

Preferences of Cancer Survivors for Follow-Up Care: A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments.

Cancer survivors frequently encounter multiple challenges, including physical, psychological, social, emotional, and financial difficulties. These challenges significantly impact their quality of life and recovery process. This systematic review intends to delineate and assess the evidence gathered from discrete choice experiments, aiming to unravel the preferences of cancer survivors towards their follow-up care. A systematic literature review was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, CNKI, Wanfang, and SinoMed databases up to July 2024. Two reviewers independently conducted the screening, data extraction, and quality appraisal of the studies. The collected data were synthesized through a narrative approach. Additionally, semi-quantitative analyses were used to evaluate the frequency, importance, and significance of each attribute. Eight studies conducted across four countries were analyzed, yielding 41 distinct attributes grouped into eight main categories and 14 subcategories, further refined by subject matter. Despite the differences in payment systems between countries, the type of provider topped the list of preferences for cancer survivors' follow-up care. Next in preference was the contact modality. Service quality (comprehensive plans, personalized service, detailed information) was also valued. However, opinions diverged on continuity, additional support, and service frequency. The attributes of follow-up care preferences integrated in this review demonstrate a diverse range among cancer survivors. Generally, they prioritize skilled professionals, flexible contact modality, and other high-quality follow-up care elements. Future studies should analyze cancer survivors' preferences for follow-up care from the perspectives of different stakeholders, and further consider internal and external factors to ensure authentic decision making.

Quality appraisal of clinical guidelines for peripherally inserted central catheter-related thrombosis prophylaxis in patients: a systematic review.

To evaluate and analyse the quality of clinical practice guidelines for Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter-related thrombosis (PICC-related thrombosis) to identify the most current and effective prophylactic measures recommended in the guidelines. Scoring and analysis of the guidelines using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II). Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Chinese databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wan Fang) and the relevant websites of the guideline were searched through 8 August 2024. Studies that primarily clinical practice guidelines on the prevention of PICC-related thrombosis were included. Two reviewers independently screened the searched items and extracted data and scored documents using AGREE II. Findings were summarised in Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) evidence profiles and synthesised qualitatively. The analysis incorporated a total of nine guidelines, all rated as 'recommended' or 'recommended with modifications'. Standardised scores revealed elevated performance in the domains of Scope and Purpose, Clarity of Presentation and Editorial Independence. Conversely, the Stakeholder Involvement and Applicability domains yielded the lowest average standardised scores. Disparities in standardised scores across guidelines were particularly evident in the domains of Rigour of Development, Stakeholder Involvement and Applicability. The agreement between the two appraisers was almost perfect (intraclass correlation coefficients higher than 0.80). A considerable proportion of recommendations relied on evidence of low-quality, in certain instances, were derived from expert opinions within working groups. The review reveals that a significant portion of recommendations relies on low-quality evidence. Guideline developers are urged to prioritise methodological quality, with a specific focus on refining Stakeholder Involvement and Applicability domains. Addressing these aspects will enhance the overall quality and reliability of PICC-related thrombosis prevention guidelines. One potential way to mitigate these challenges is to endorse a standardised approach to guideline development and to synthesise reliable clinical evidence to reduce variation in recommendations. CRD42023495519.

Effects of Injury Registry Data on Policy Making, Hospitalizations, and Mortality: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Initiated in 2021, a Brazilian project aims to establish a national injury registry, compiling comprehensive data on events and individuals across the country, irrespective of injury severity. The registry integrates information from prehospital and hospital care, diverse health systems lacking interoperability, and sectors such as firefighters and the police. Its primary goal is to enhance health surveillance by providing timely, high-quality information, guiding prevention strategies, and informing policy making. The project still aims to reduce long-term morbidity and mortality associated with injuries. A knowledge gap remains regarding the effects of injury registries in relation to policies and injury outcomes. This protocol outlines a systematic review and meta-analysis to answer "What is the effect of implementation and use of injury registry data on policy making, hospitalization, and mortality?" The systematic review follows PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, focusing on studies reporting results related to the implementation and use of injury registries, including trauma registries. Outcomes of interest include policy making, hospitalization rates or duration, and mortality. Registries within well-defined administrative boundaries will be included. Data will be collected from PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Lilacs, and references. Records will be independently screened by 2 reviewers, with any disagreements resolved through arbitration by a third reviewer. Homogeneous studies, with 3 or more evaluating the same outcome, may undergo meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses by registry type, injury groups, and other selected variables of interest will be conducted. Sensitivity analysis, risk of bias assessment, publication bias evaluation, and quality appraisal will also be performed. This systematic review will run from November 2023 to June 2024. No identical review was found. Search strategies were finalized, the bibliographic search started, duplicates were eliminated, and title and abstract screening began. Of 35 studies retrieved, 85 were excluded due to duplication, leaving 50 for selection. This study is timely, aligning with ongoing national efforts to implement an injury registry. By synthesizing available evidence, we will identify the potential of injury registries to guide the decisions of Brazilian policy makers. PROSPERO CRD42023481528; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=481528. PRR1-10.2196/55029.

The Effect of Overweight/Obesity on Cutaneous Microvascular Reactivity as Measured by Laser-Doppler Fluxmetry: A Systematic Review

Introduction: We sought to determine by systematic review the independent effect of overweight/obesity on cutaneous microvascular reactivity in adults as measured by laser-Doppler fluxmetry. Methods: CINAHL Complete, SPORTSDiscus, Embase, Medline, and Cochrane Library were searched until March 2024 to identify studies investigating cutaneous microvascular reactivity in an overweight/obese but otherwise healthy group versus a lean/healthy weight. Reporting is consistent with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Quality appraisal of included studies was performed using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist. Results: Nineteen eligible articles reported on 1847 participants. Most articles reported impaired cutaneous microvascular reactivity in cohorts with overweight/obesity compared to cohorts with lean/healthy weight. Investigating reactivity via post-occlusive reactive hyperaemia (PORH) and iontophoresis of acetylcholine (ACh) has shown significance. No significant differences were reported between groups in response to local heating or to iontophoresis of methacholine or insulin, while findings of the effect of obesity on iontophoresis of sodium nitroprusside (SNP) were mixed. Conclusions: The pathophysiology of impaired cutaneous microvascular reactivity in overweight/obesity requires further investigation; however, impaired function of vasoactive substances, endothelial dysfunction, sensory nerves, and calcium-activated potassium channels may be implicated. Identifying these impaired microvascular responses should inform possible therapy targets in overweight and obesity.activated potassium channels may be implicated. Identifying these impaired microvascular responses should inform possible therapy targets in overweight and obesity.

Social inequalities in cancer incidence, survival and mortality: An umbrella review

Abstract Background An increasing number of systematic reviews investigating differences in cancer burden by social factors such as race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status have been published in recent years. Our study aims to evaluate the strength and quality of evidence from systematic reviews investigating associations between social factors and cancer incidence, survival, and mortality to help policy-makers reduce existing social inequalities in the burden of cancer. Methods Our study is a pre-registered umbrella review (PROSPERO; CRD42024552884). We systematically searched Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Library, the JBI EBP database, and Epistemonikos without date restrictions for published systematic reviews with or without meta-analyses on June 17, 2024. The search identified 15,542 records, which were reduced to 7,421 after deduplication. We are currently screening studies to include systematic reviews of cohort or case-control studies that examined associations between one or more social factors (gender, race/ethnicity, education, occupation, socioeconomic status, place of residence, religion, social capital) and cancer outcomes. Study screening, data extraction, and quality appraisal will be done in duplicate using pre-piloted forms. The strength of evidence of reported associations between social factors and cancer outcomes will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. Before data synthesis, we will assess the degree of overlap between primary studies in the eligible reviews by creating citation matrices and calculating corrected covered area indices. Following this, we will narratively summarize associations (for systematic reviews without meta-analyses) and pool the risk estimates for individual social factors and cancer outcomes (for reviews with meta-analyses) using random-effects meta-analysis models. We will have preliminary results ready by November 2024. Key messages • Our umbrella review aims to evaluate the strength and quality of evidence from systematic reviews which have examined social inequalities in cancer incidence, survival, and mortality. • This high-level evidence synthesis can help policy-makers better plan and target interventions to reduce the existing social inequalities in the burden of cancer.

Healthcare professionals and students’ knowledge on termination of pregnancy: A systematic review

Abstract Background Providing safe termination of pregnancy (TOP) according to each country’s legalisation is an important public health matter internationally. Healthcare professionals (HCPs) and healthcare students have key roles and need to be aware of legislation and clinical practice guidelines on TOP in their country to facilitate safe and effective care. The main aim of this systematic review was to investigate the level of knowledge on TOP legislation among HCPs and healthcare students. The second objective was to assess the knowledge of TOP methods, procedures and/or potential associated complications. Methods This is a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative peer-reviewed studies published in English or Portuguese until July 2020. Databases included in the search were EBSCO, PubMed, Embase and Scopus. The quality appraisal was done using the CASP Critical Appraisal tools. Results A total of 31 studies were included, published between 2002 and 2020 and from several regions around the globe. No studies were carried out in Europe or the United Kingdom. A total of 22 studies included healthcare professionals and nine studies included students. Overall, all the studies showed poor knowledge of TOP legislation and TOP methods, procedures and complications. Knowledge of special circumstances established in the law where TOP might be legal was also very limited. In studies focussing on medical (MA) and surgical (SA) TOP, knowledge of MA was lower than of SA. Studies reported that practitioners and students have limited training in TOP. Overall, education/training and experience with TOP seem to be the main factors associated with increased levels of knowledge. Similar results were found for student’s knowledge. Conclusions This study highlighted the importance of involving and promoting the participation of HCPs and students in the provision of TOP services. A clear need and desire for staff education and training on TOP was shown. Key messages • TOP training is limited and broadly excluded from medical and healthcare education globally. Students and staff have recognised this issue and the critical impact it has on TOP care provided. • Adequate knowledge and training in TOP ensures service sustainability and preparation of current and future healthcare practitioners to provide high-quality, respectful and compassionate care.

Risk Factors for Unplanned Readmissions in Paediatric Neurosurgery: A Systematic Review

Abstract Background Unplanned hospital readmission (UHR) after paediatric neurosurgery is an important indicator of surgical outcomes. As this field deals with complex cases, there is an increased likelihood of potential complications and the subsequent need for readmission. Hence, the study aims to identify factors contributing to 30-day and 90-day UHR rates in children undergoing neurosurgical procedures. Methods A systematic review (Prospero CRD 42023455779) was conducted, which included studies from Embase, Medline, CINAHL, and Global Index Medicus databases that reported unplanned readmissions within 30-/90-days of an index neurosurgical procedure. Quality and risk of bias assessment was done using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Data extraction and narrative synthesis were performed to identify significant factors associated with UHR. Results 2593 titles were identified following the search strategy. 52 studies were included after screening and quality appraisal. Most studies were from the United States and are retrospective cohort in nature. Majority were cranial procedures (n = 30), with common ones being shunt procedures for hydrocephalus and cranial tumour resections. Aetiology-related, procedural complexities, and age emerged as the three most common significant risk factors. Age is a significant predictor (9/52), with younger children facing higher odds compared to their older counterparts across different procedures. While early readmissions can be due to disease progression, some are linked to preventable causes. The included studies also exhibited significant heterogeneity. Variations in definitions and examined variables, as well as the inclusion of studies from both national databases and single institutions, contributed to this heterogeneity. Conclusions Overall, findings from this study contribute to a collective understanding of factors affecting unplanned readmissions in paediatric neurosurgery. Key messages • Identified risk factors can help guide creating and refining surgical protocols for post-operative monitoring and follow-up. • UHRs reflect the interplay among surgical complexity, patient characteristics such as age, and disease aetiology.

Scanning the horizon- environmental health indicator surveillance

Abstract Aim This work aimed to conduct a comprehensive literature review with narrative synthesis of evidence in relation to the surveillance of environmental health indicators by Public Health agencies internationally. This will strengthen the All-Hazards approach to Health Protection in Ireland. Methods The project proposal was registered on PROSPERO. Preferred Reporting Systems for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. A systematic search was conducted across five databases. In addition, relevant websites, reference lists and the grey literature were searched. Data were extracted following TIDieR-PHP guidelines. Risk of bias was considered and quality appraisal was performed using SANRA and AGREE-HS tools. A narrative synthesis of the evidence was completed. Results 12 papers were included in the final review. Four were narrative review articles describing European and worldwide initiatives and the remaining eight described a single health system. Only three papers were deemed high quality. The number of indicators monitored varied widely from one in Italy to over 400 in the USA. The most established programmes described the use of a framework such as Drivers-Pressures-States-Exposures-Effects-Actions (DPSEEA) and indicator selection criteria were applied. The papers described a variety of public health actions arising from the surveillance of environmental health indicators. The knowledge provided by this review can inform the implementation process. Establishment of a project team, and beginning with monitoring one domain is suggested. Air quality is the most frequently monitored domain internationally. The DPSEEA framework is recommended, and Briggs’ indicator selection criteria should be applied to any indicator under consideration. The system should measure both hazard and outcome measures. Finally, meaningful public health action should result from the monitoring. Key messages • Environmental health indicator surveillance is essential to all-hazards health protection. • Few public health agencies internationally are systematically monitoring environmental health outcomes.

Gastrointestinal infections and ethnicity in the UK: a systematic review and narrative synthesis

Abstract Background Gastrointestinal (GI) infections exert a significant public health burden on healthcare services in the United Kingdom (UK). The literature suggests an association between ethnicity and health; however, we do not know the extent of inequalities in GI infection/disease in the UK. This systematic review aimed to identify studies that ascertain differences in the incidence or prevalence of GI infections between UK ethnic groups and explore possible explanations for heterogeneity observed within the literature. Methods MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus, Web of Science (Science Social Science Citation Index), and grey literature were searched from 1980 to 21st June 2023 for studies reporting an association between ethnicity and GI infections in UK population samples. Two reviewers independently screened the studies and conducted quality appraisals; data extraction was undertaken by one reviewer and verified by another reviewer. A narrative synthesis was undertaken and a harvest plot supported the textual synthesis to investigate potential sources of heterogeneity in effect estimates by GI pathogen and ethnic group. Results The searches identified 10028 studies, of which 16 met the inclusion criteria. 15 out of 47 effect estimates from a total of 16 studies found that GI infection risk was greater in Black and Ethnic Minority Groups, mainly of Asian ethnicity, compared to the majority White population. 13 studies reported a higher risk in ethnic minorities of Asian ethnicity, while one study described a higher risk in the Non-White ethnic group. One single study on STEC reported a higher risk of GI infection in the White population compared to the Non-White population, while another single study on norovirus found no significant difference by ethnic group. Conclusions This systematic review demonstrates that ethnic minority groups in the UK have a higher risk of GI infections than the general or White population. Key messages • There is a clear need to elucidate further the high incidence of GI infections in UK Indian, Pakistani, and Bangladeshi communities. • Tackling ethnic inequalities requires a concerted approach and translating evidence into policy.

GRADE evidence to decision framework in genomics guidelines: systematic review & appraisal

Abstract Background Transparent development of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) is important for genomic medicine, as this field promises to partially challenge the traditional hierarchies of evidence. The GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) framework has recently emerged as a transparent and rigorous tool to produce recommendations. Our aim was to survey the genomic CPGs that used the GRADE EtD and appraise the applicability of its criteria and the quality of produced CPGs. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and the gray literature till 2023 for relevant CPGs. From each eligible CPG, we extracted the reporting of the GRADE EtD criteria: benefits, harms, resource use, cost-effectiveness, acceptability, feasibility, equity and values. The quality of the CPGs were appraised across various domains using the (AGREE) II instrument. Results Among 1,144 records, 15 CPGs met inclusion criteria between 2018 and 2023, comprising 66 recommendations. Reporting of GRADE EtD criteria varied. Benefits, harms and their balance were addressed in approximately half of the recommendations 48% and 52% respectively. Feasibility, acceptability and values were also 52%, 47% and 40% respectively, resource use 39%, cost-effectiveness 23%. Equity was addressed in 36% of the recommendations. Quality appraisal of the CPGs also varied, domains were reported as follows: scope and purpose, clarity of presentation, editorial independence 86%, 85% and 84% respectively, rigor of development 77%, stakeholder involvement 72%, while applicability was 59%. Conclusions GRADE EtD is applied heterogeneously in genomic medicine CPGs, with difficulty in applying all of its criteria, including benefits and harms. Quality varied across domains with applicability of the CPGs less demonstrated. Key messages • Transparent approaches are needed in developing CPGs for genomic medicine. • Current genomic CPGs fail to address crucial aspects for producing recommendations, including benefits and harms.

The Types and Effectiveness of Mobile Health Applications Used in Improving Oral Cancer Knowledge: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review

ABSTRACTBackground and AimsThe global burden of oral cancer (OC) is enormous. Mobile health applications have been found to play a promising role in cancer prevention; however, no known systematic review evidence exists on whether the use of mobile health applications is effective in increasing public knowledge of OC or not. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to synthesize evidence on the types and effectiveness of mobile health applications used for improving OC knowledge.MethodsThis study adopted a mixed methods systematic review design. The review methodology was informed by Joanna Brigg's Institute's PRISMA checklist and the AMSTAR‐2 guidelines. The literature used for this review were obtained through the search of multiple sources, including 12 electronic databases, web sources, and manual searching of the reference lists and citations of the included articles. Quality appraisal of the included articles was done using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, after which relevant data were collected, synthesized, and configured.ResultsA total of three high‐quality articles, from two studies conducted in India, were included in this review. The studies investigated 574 participants, who are predominantly doctors and community members, on two Android‐based mobile health applications (M‐OncoED and Prayaas). Only Prayaas was found to significantly increase OC knowledge among its users (p < 0.05). Only M‐OncoED was found to significantly increase the practice of OC screening advice provision among a selected group of users. No other significant finding was reported on the effect of OC knowledge obtained from the use of these applications on clinical, behavioral, and epidemiological outcomes.ConclusionMobile health application‐based education is a highly underutilised but very promising strategy that can be used to improve public knowledge of OC. This strategy needs to be adopted in public education programmes on OC.