Event Abstract Back to Event How good are we at distinguishing errors observed in a naturalistic test of executive functions? C Bottari1, 2*, N D Anderson3, 4, D. Stuss5, 6 and D. Dawson3, 7 1 McGill University, Montreal Neurological Institute, Canada 2 Université de Montréal, École de réadaptation, Canada 3 Kunin-Lunenfeld Applied Research Unit at Baycrest, Canada 4 University of Toronto, Departments of Medicine (Psychiatry) and Psychology, Canada 5 Rotman Research Institute at Baycrest, Canada 6 University of Toronto, Departments of Medicine (Neurology) and Psychology, Canada 7 University of Toronto, Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Canada Individuals with cognitive deficits at times make errors during the performance of everyday tasks, such as forgetting to turn off the stove. Despite the implicit assumption that clinicians can discriminate individuals with various executive function deficits from healthy controls, investigating the validity of this assumption is critical to informed treatment plans. Objective: To determine if clinicians can discriminate errors of action observed in a neurological population from those observed in healthy controls. Methods: A convenience sample of 90 occupational therapists and neuropsychologists were recruited. Clinicians participated in one session where they analyzed 27 one-to three-minute video clips illustrating errors made by healthy controls and adults with stroke or TBI during the Baycrest Multiple Errands Test (Dawson et al., 2009). For each error, clinicians were asked to indicate whether the error had been committed by a neurological or healthy subject. Results: There was considerable discrepancy in the attribution of errors -only one error was attributed correctly by all participants. Clinicians attributed only 15 of the 27 errors (55.6%) to the correct population at a proportion significantly different than chance (p<0.05). Conclusion: These results suggest that the number, rather than the type, of observed errors may more robustly distinguish controls from neurological subjects. Conference: The 20th Annual Rotman Research Institute Conference, The frontal lobes, Toronto, Canada, 22 Mar - 26 Mar, 2010. Presentation Type: Poster Presentation Topic: Neuropsychology Citation: Bottari C, Anderson N, Stuss D and Dawson D (2010). How good are we at distinguishing errors observed in a naturalistic test of executive functions?. Conference Abstract: The 20th Annual Rotman Research Institute Conference, The frontal lobes. doi: 10.3389/conf.fnins.2010.14.00129 Copyright: The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers. They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters. The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated. Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed. For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions. Received: 30 Jun 2010; Published Online: 30 Jun 2010. * Correspondence: C Bottari, McGill University, Montreal Neurological Institute, Montréal, Canada, carolina.bottari@umontreal.ca Login Required This action requires you to be registered with Frontiers and logged in. To register or login click here. Abstract Info Abstract The Authors in Frontiers C Bottari N D Anderson D. Stuss D. Dawson Google C Bottari N D Anderson D. Stuss D. Dawson Google Scholar C Bottari N D Anderson D. Stuss D. Dawson PubMed C Bottari N D Anderson D. Stuss D. Dawson Related Article in Frontiers Google Scholar PubMed Abstract Close Back to top Javascript is disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser settings in order to see all the content on this page.