Application Of Tacrolimus Ointment Research Articles

Skin and systemic pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus following topical application of tacrolimus ointment in adults with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis

Systemic exposure to tacrolimus following topical application of tacrolimus ointment is minimal. There are, however, no data on the distribution of tacrolimus in the skin. To assess the distribution of tacrolimus in the skin and the systemic pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in adults with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis after first and repeated application of tacrolimus ointment. We investigated skin distribution of topically applied tacrolimus and systemic pharmacokinetics of percutaneously absorbed tacrolimus in adults with atopic dermatitis after topical application of tacrolimus 0.1% ointment twice daily for 2 weeks. Tacrolimus concentrations were assessed in full-thickness skin biopsies and blood samples. Of 14 patients, 11 completed treatment and were analysed. Mean +/- SD tacrolimus concentrations in the skin at 24 h after first and last ointment applications were 94 +/- 20 and 595 +/- 98 ng cm(-3), respectively. At 168 h after stopping treatment, values were 97% lower than at 24 h after last application. Tacrolimus concentration decreased with increasing skin depth. Systemic tacrolimus exposure after ointment application was low and highly variable, with 31% of samples below the limit of quantification (0.025 ng mL(-1)) and 94% below 1 ng mL(-1). Blood concentrations at 24 h after the first and last ointment applications were 750 and 1800 times lower, respectively, than those in skin. Physicians' assessments showed that tacrolimus ointment was effective and well tolerated. Tacrolimus was primarily partitioned in the skin, with minimal systemic absorption after topical application, in patients with atopic dermatitis.

Three Times Weekly Tacrolimus Ointment Reduces Relapse in Stabilized Atopic Dermatitis: A New Paradigm for Use

Long-term, safe and effective therapeutic options for managing the chronic relapsing nature of atopic dermatitis are essential for improving patient quality of life. To minimize the risks of continued topical corticosteroid usage and potentially reduce the incidence of flares, we tested the efficacy and safety of a rotational paradigm of initial brief application of topical corticosteroid followed by long-term intermittent application of non-steroidal tacrolimus ointment to previously inflamed sites of dermatitis. In this 2-phase study, patients who were 2 to 15 years of age and had moderate to severe atopic dermatitis were randomly assigned to 4 days of twice-daily double-blind therapy with either alclometasone ointment 0.05% or tacrolimus ointment 0.03% (Phase I acute), followed by up to 16 weeks of twice-daily open-label tacrolimus ointment 0.03% (Phase I short-term). Patients whose disease stabilized underwent new randomization to double-blind tacrolimus ointment 0.03% or vehicle applied once daily, 3 times per week to clinically normal-appearing skin for up to 40 weeks (Phase II). Corticosteroid use was prohibited. Of 206 randomly assigned patients, 152 completed Phase I; 105 of 152 were randomly assigned into Phase II (68 tacrolimus ointment and 37 vehicle). There were no differences in adverse events between alclometasone and tacrolimus (Phase I) or between tacrolimus and vehicle (Phase II). In the acute period, alclometasone-treated patients showed greater improvement in atopic dermatitis signs and symptoms; thereafter, when all patients applied tacrolimus ointment (short-term), there were no differences. In Phase II, tacrolimus-treated patients had significantly more disease-free days compared with vehicle, significantly longer time to first relapse, and significantly fewer disease relapse days. For patients with stabilized moderate to severe atopic dermatitis, long-term intermittent application of tacrolimus ointment to normal-appearing but previously affected skin was significantly more effective than vehicle at maintaining disease stabilization, with a safety profile similar to vehicle.

Effect of sequential applications of topical tacrolimus and topical corticosteroids in the treatment of pediatric atopic dermatitis: An open-label pilot study

The efficacy of combination therapy with topical corticosteroids and tacrolimus in the treatment of atopic dermatitis remains to be established. Our aim was to determine whether a regimen of sequential application of topical corticosteroids and topical tacrolimus is effective in the treatment of pediatric atopic dermatitis. A second goal was to assess the impact of this treatment regimen on quality of life (QOL) and the response shift on QOL changes. The study regimen consisted of 3 phases. In the induction phase, patients were treated for a 2-week period with application of 0.03% tacrolimus ointment in the morning and application of a strong- or weak-potency corticosteroid ointment in the evening. In the transitional phase, they were treated for an additional 2 weeks with 0.03% tacrolimus ointment twice daily on weekdays and concurrent application of tacrolimus and a topical corticosteroid ointment on weekend days. In the maintenance phase, the corticosteroid ointment was discontinued and 0.03% tacrolimus ointment was applied twice daily for an additional 2 weeks. Daily application of tacrolimus ointment was then discontinued and replaced by an emollient with application of 0.03% tacrolimus ointment only when necessary for an additional 6 weeks. The Eczema Area and Severity Index score, Investigators' Global Assessment, severity of pruritus and sleep disturbance scores, and QOL evaluation were measured. After 12 weeks, the patients completed a retrospective version of the pretreatment QOL evaluation for analysis of response shift bias. Eczema Area and Severity Index scores decreased by the sixth week, and continued improvement was observed during an additional 6-week period. Both the pruritus and sleep disturbance scores decreased throughout the study. Of patients, 90% showed marked clinical improvement at week 6 and 96% at week 12. On the Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index and the Infant's Dermatology QOL Index survey, mean QOL scores improved after completion of therapy at week 12. The mean difference between the pretest and the retrospective pretest scores indicated the presence of a response shift bias. This was an uncontrolled, open-label study. Conclusions are limited by the small sample size. A fixed sequential regimen of application of tacrolimus ointment with tapering of topical corticosteroids may limit the long-term use and adverse effects of topical corticosteroids, while maintaining clinical control of pediatric atopic dermatitis and improving the QOL. The finding of a response shift bias suggests that parents/guardians underestimate the seriousness of skin disease and its impact on QOL.

Proactive treatment of atopic dermatitis in adults with 0.1% tacrolimus ointment

Long-term treatment for atopic dermatitis (AD) using low dose, intermittent, topical anti-inflammatory agents may control acute disease and prevent relapses. This 12-month, European, multicentre, randomized study investigated whether the proactive use of 0.1% tacrolimus ointment applied twice weekly can keep AD in remission and reduce the incidence of disease exacerbations (DE). During the initial open-label period, 257 adults with AD applied 0.1% tacrolimus ointment twice daily (b.i.d.) for up to 6 weeks to affected areas. When an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score of <or=2 was achieved, the patient entered the disease control period (DCP) and was randomized to either proactive tacrolimus (n = 116) or vehicle ointment (n = 108) twice weekly for 12 months. Exacerbations were treated with 0.1% tacrolimus ointment b.i.d. until an IGA <or=2 was regained, then randomized treatment was restarted. The primary endpoint was the number of DEs during the DCP that required a substantial therapeutic intervention. Proactive tacrolimus 0.1% ointment application significantly reduced the number of DEs requiring substantial therapeutic intervention (median difference 2; P < 0.001; Wilcoxon rank sum test), the percentage of DE treatment days (median difference: 15.2%; P < 0.001; Wilcoxon rank sum test) and increased the time to first DE (median 142 vs 15 days; P < 0.001; stratified log-rank test). The adverse event profile was similar for the two treatment approaches. A 12-month, twice weekly proactive tacrolimus ointment application was an effective treatment in most study patients which prevented, delayed and reduced the occurrence of AD exacerbations

Proactive treatment of atopic dermatitis in adults with 0.1% tacrolimus ointment

Background: Long‐term treatment for atopic dermatitis (AD) using low dose, intermittent, topical anti‐inflammatory agents may control acute disease and prevent relapses. This 12‐month, European, multicentre, randomized study investigated whether the proactive use of 0.1% tacrolimus ointment applied twice weekly can keep AD in remission and reduce the incidence of disease exacerbations (DE).Methods: During the initial open‐label period, 257 adults with AD applied 0.1% tacrolimus ointment twice daily (b.i.d.) for up to 6 weeks to affected areas. When an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score of ≤2 was achieved, the patient entered the disease control period (DCP) and was randomized to either proactive tacrolimus (n = 116) or vehicle ointment (n = 108) twice weekly for 12 months. Exacerbations were treated with 0.1% tacrolimus ointment b.i.d. until an IGA ≤2 was regained, then randomized treatment was restarted. The primary endpoint was the number of DEs during the DCP that required a substantial therapeutic intervention.Results: Proactive tacrolimus 0.1% ointment application significantly reduced the number of DEs requiring substantial therapeutic intervention (median difference 2; P &lt; 0.001; Wilcoxon rank sum test), the percentage of DE treatment days (median difference: 15.2%; P &lt; 0.001; Wilcoxon rank sum test) and increased the time to first DE (median 142 vs 15 days; P &lt; 0.001; stratified log‐rank test). The adverse event profile was similar for the two treatment approaches.Conclusion: A 12‐month, twice weekly proactive tacrolimus ointment application was an effective treatment in most study patients which prevented, delayed and reduced the occurrence of AD exacerbations.

Treatment of localized lichen myxedematosus of discrete type with tacrolimus ointment

Treatment of localized lichen myxedematosus of discrete type with tacrolimus ointment

Oral graft vs. host disease in children – Treatment with topical tacrolimus ointment

Oral chronic graft vs. host disease (GVHD) frequently presents in patients with sclerotic features of skin GVHD and is often associated with considerable limitations of oral food intake and decreased quality of life. Systemic tacrolimus is efficacious for prophylaxis and treatment of acute and chronic GVHD and topical tacrolimus has shown activity in chronic GVHD skin lesions. We therefore initiated a pilot study to investigate the safety and efficacy of topical tacrolimus ointment in children with oral GVHD. Six patients suffering from oral GVHD (five chronic and one acute) were included in the study. Tacrolimus ointment 0.1% was applied twice daily using sterile gauze. The only side-effects observed were a slight burning discomfort after the first application in one patient and after food intake in another patient. Tacrolimus was absorbed systemically in four of six patients. Of six patients, we observed a complete response in two, a very good partial response (VGPR) in two, and a PR in two patients, respectively. We conclude that topical application of tacrolimus ointment holds promise as a safe and efficacious treatment for oral GVHD in children. The Food and Drug Administration has recently issued a health advisory about a potential cancer risk associated with topical tacrolimus treatment of the skin; therefore, its benefits should be weighed against its potential risks and diligent long-term follow-up should be carried out especially in children.

Oral chronic GVHD in children—treatment with topical tacrolimus ointment

Oral chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD) frequently presents as lichen-type changes, hyperkeratotic plaques, pseudomembranes, or decreased oral range of motion in patients with sclerotic features of skin GVHD and is often associated with significant limitations of oral food intake and a generally decreased quality of life. Decreased oral intake is especially problematic in children with already reduced caloric uptake due to chronic gastrointestinal GVHD. Systemic tacrolimus is well established and efficacious for prophylaxis and treatment of acute and chronic GVHD and topical tacrolimus has shown activity in chronic GVHD skin lesions. We therefore initiated a pilot study to investigate the safety and efficacy of topical tacrolimus ointment in pediatric stem cell transplant recipients with debilitating oral chronic GVHD. Two patients (6 and 13 years) with β-thalassemia were included in the study at 179 and 382 days post transplant respectively. Both suffered from progressive onset, moderate to severe chronic GVHD with involvement of the oral mucosa exhibiting lichen-type changes alongside pain, erythema and small ulcerations of the oral mucosa. One patient additionally presented with progressive sclerosis of the lips limiting opening of the oral cavity. In both patients oral lesions had been refractory to systemic GVHD treatment (cyclosporine 3 and 2 mg/kg respectively). After exclusion of infectious causes for oral lesions, tacrolimus ointment 0.1% (Protopic®, Fujisawa Healthcare) was applied twice daily using a sterile gauze that was inserted into both buccal pouches and left in place for 20 minutes without rinsing the mouth afterwards. At a follow up of 24 and 14 weeks respectively, the only side effect observed was a slight burning discomfort after the first application in one patient. Tacrolimus was absorbed in both patients as exhibited by tacrolimus plasma levels up to 4.2 and 5.6 ng/ml respectively. Pain, erythematous lesions and ulcerations disappeared within 4 weeks of treatment in both. Lichenoid changes markedly improved in both and range of oral opening normalized in the patient affected. Systemic immunosuppression was tapered during treatment with topical tacrolimus in both patients. We conclude that topical application of tacrolimus ointment holds promise as a safe and efficacious treatment for oral chronic GVHD in children. These findings deserve to be affirmed in a larger prospective evaluation. Oral chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD) frequently presents as lichen-type changes, hyperkeratotic plaques, pseudomembranes, or decreased oral range of motion in patients with sclerotic features of skin GVHD and is often associated with significant limitations of oral food intake and a generally decreased quality of life. Decreased oral intake is especially problematic in children with already reduced caloric uptake due to chronic gastrointestinal GVHD. Systemic tacrolimus is well established and efficacious for prophylaxis and treatment of acute and chronic GVHD and topical tacrolimus has shown activity in chronic GVHD skin lesions. We therefore initiated a pilot study to investigate the safety and efficacy of topical tacrolimus ointment in pediatric stem cell transplant recipients with debilitating oral chronic GVHD. Two patients (6 and 13 years) with β-thalassemia were included in the study at 179 and 382 days post transplant respectively. Both suffered from progressive onset, moderate to severe chronic GVHD with involvement of the oral mucosa exhibiting lichen-type changes alongside pain, erythema and small ulcerations of the oral mucosa. One patient additionally presented with progressive sclerosis of the lips limiting opening of the oral cavity. In both patients oral lesions had been refractory to systemic GVHD treatment (cyclosporine 3 and 2 mg/kg respectively). After exclusion of infectious causes for oral lesions, tacrolimus ointment 0.1% (Protopic®, Fujisawa Healthcare) was applied twice daily using a sterile gauze that was inserted into both buccal pouches and left in place for 20 minutes without rinsing the mouth afterwards. At a follow up of 24 and 14 weeks respectively, the only side effect observed was a slight burning discomfort after the first application in one patient. Tacrolimus was absorbed in both patients as exhibited by tacrolimus plasma levels up to 4.2 and 5.6 ng/ml respectively. Pain, erythematous lesions and ulcerations disappeared within 4 weeks of treatment in both. Lichenoid changes markedly improved in both and range of oral opening normalized in the patient affected. Systemic immunosuppression was tapered during treatment with topical tacrolimus in both patients. We conclude that topical application of tacrolimus ointment holds promise as a safe and efficacious treatment for oral chronic GVHD in children. These findings deserve to be affirmed in a larger prospective evaluation.

Pneumococcal seroconversion after vaccination for children with atopic dermatitis treated with tacrolimus ointment

We sought to determine the effect of treatment with topical tacrolimus on B- and T-cell immunity including the primary antibody response to pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine in children with atopic dermatitis. In this open-label, noncomparative study, 23 children aged 2 to 12 years with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis were treated with tacrolimus 0.03% ointment twice daily for 7 weeks, immunized with a 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine after 3 weeks of treatment, and had their antibody response measured (for 12 pneumococcal serotype antigens present in the vaccine) before and 4 weeks after vaccination. None had received pneumococcal vaccine before the study. Patient antibody and cellular immune responses were assessed at each study visit (baseline, week 3, and week 7). No significant changes in complete blood cell count, lymphocyte subsets, CD4/CD8 ratio, immunoglobulin levels, antibody titers to tetanus and Haemophilus influenzae , or lymphoproliferative responses were noted during the tacrolimus ointment treatment period. Tacrolimus blood levels were 1 ng/mL or less in all 23 children. Protective pneumococcal titers to all 12 serotypes were observed in 2 of 23 (9%) children prevaccination and in 16 of 23 (70%) children postvaccination. All 6 children who had protective titers to 0 to 5 of the 12 serotypes developed protective titers to an additional 5 to 11 serotypes. Of the patients, 91% had a greater than 4-fold increase in titer for at least 4 of 12 pneumococcal serotypes. Topical application of tacrolimus ointment does not affect the serologic response to pneumococcal vaccine or interfere with preexisting T- and B-cell immune responses.

An open‐label pilot study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of topically applied tacrolimus ointment for the treatment of hand and/or foot eczema

BACKGROUND: Hand and foot eczema is a chronic skin disorder. Although topical corticosteroids are often used to control the predominant symptoms of the disease, the chronicity of the condition increases the risk of long‐term adverse effects. A safer alternative is needed.OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of tacrolimus ointment 0.1% in hand and/or foot eczema.METHODS: Twenty‐five adults applied tacrolimus ointment 0.1% to affected areas three times daily for 8 weeks and were followed for 2 additional weeks.RESULTS: Except for vesiculation, compared with baseline there were significant improvements in erythema, scaling, induration, fissuring, composite severity, and pruritus (p<0.007). Two weeks after discontinuing treatment, significant improvement in scaling and composite severity (p<0.03) persisted, whereas erythema, induration, vesiculation, fissuring, and pruritus had returned to pre‐treatment levels.CONCLUSION: Tacrolimus ointment 0.1% is a promising corticosteroid alternative for hand/foot eczema.

Topical Tacrolimus as a Therapeutic Adjunct in Patients with Cutaneous Lupus erythematosus

The topical therapy of cutaneous lupus erythematosus (LE) consists mainly of corticosteroids which may lead to significant side effects when overused. We report the efficacy of topical tacrolimus as a therapeutic adjunct in 3 patients with cutaneous LE of the face. All patients, 1 with systemic LE and a malar rash, 1 with annular subacute cutaneous LE, the other with a papular variant of subacute cutaneous LE, experienced significant improvement following application of tacrolimus ointment. Treatment with topical tacrolimus was tolerated well without major side effects in all patients. The presented cases are in line with recent reports that topical tacrolimus may be effective in facial LE.

Topically applied tacrolimus ointment in pediatric atopic dermatitis patients: Results of a large open-label study

Topically applied tacrolimus ointment in pediatric atopic dermatitis patients: Results of a large open-label study

Long-term safety of topically applied tacrolimus ointment in adult atopic dermatitis patients

Long-term safety of topically applied tacrolimus ointment in adult atopic dermatitis patients

Tacrolimus ointment for the treatment of steroid-induced rosacea: A preliminary report

Background: Excessive topical corticosteroid application to facial areas commonly leads to steroid-induced rosacea. This may be a recalcitrant problem that requires months of antibiotic and anti-inflammatory therapy before it resolves. Objective: The purpose of this article is to review the use of tacrolimus ointment, a macrolide anti-inflammatory ointment for the treatment of 3 patients with steroid-induced rosacea. Methods: Three patients with steroid-induced rosacea applied tacrolimus ointment, 0.075% twice daily for 7 to 10 days. Patients were also instructed to avoid topical corticosteroid use and other rosacea-aggravating substances including caffeine, spicy foods, alcohol, hot fluids, and fluoride. Patients were observed for tenderness, erythema, and relief of pruritus. Results: Pruritus, tenderness, and erythema were resolved in all 3 patients after 7 to 10 consecutive days' use of tacrolimus 0.075% ointment in conjunction with avoidance of topical steroids, caffeine, spicy food, alcohol, hot fluids, and fluoride. Conclusion: This preliminary study demonstrates that tacrolimus 0.075% ointment may be effective for patients with steroid-induced rosacea, when combined with avoidance of topical steroid use, as well as avoidance of other agents known to aggravate rosacea (caffeine, spicy foods, alcohol, hot fluids, and fluoride). (J Am Acad Dermatol 2001;44:995-8.)

Nonclinical and early clinical development of tacrolimus ointment for the treatment of atopic dermatitis

Tacrolimus ointment, formulated for the treatment of atopic dermatitis, is the first in a class of topical immunomodulators. Its mechanism of action is based on calcineurin inhibition, which results in suppression of antigen-specific T-cell activation and inhibition of inflammatory cytokine release. Animal and human studies have shown that topically applied tacrolimus is minimally absorbed into the systemic circulation, the fraction that is absorbed is extensively distributed, and tacrolimus does not accumulate in tissues following repeated topical application. In addition, tacrolimus ointment is not inherently irritating, sensitizing, phototoxic, or photoallergenic when applied to intact skin. Unlike some topical corticosteroids, tacrolimus ointment does not cause a decrease in collagen synthesis or skin thickness, nor does it produce skin abnormalities or depigmentation. In animal studies, repeated daily application of tacrolimus ointment up to 1 year is associated with dermal findings similar to those following vehicle application (mild to moderate dermal irritation and microscopic findings of acanthosis, hyperkeratosis, and superficial inflammation). In a 52-week study with Yucatan micropigs, no noteworthy macroscopic or microscopic changes (either dermal or systemic) related to the application of tacrolimus ointment (0.03% to 0.3% concentrations) were observed. Tacrolimus ointment was shown to be safe and effective in phase 2 and early phase 3 studies. Significant improvements in atopic dermatitis were observed in the majority of patients treated with tacrolimus ointment. The most common adverse events associated with its use were a transient burning sensation and pruritus at the site of application. Blood tacrolimus concentrations were below the limit of quantitation in most patients. (J Am Acad Dermatol 2001;44:S17-27.)

Drugs for the Treatment of Allergic Diseases

Many kinds of drugs are used for the treatment of allergic diseases. Glucocorticoids are the most efficacious drugs and widely used for the treatment of allergic diseases. Recently, effectiveness of inhaled glucocorticoids for the treatment of bronchial asthma has been established. Beclomethasone dipropionate and fluticasone propionate, which are degraded easily after absorption, are applied by inhalation. Histamine is one of the most important mediators in allergic reactions and antihistamines have widely been applied for the treatment of allergic skin diseases. In Japan, over 20 antiallergic drugs, such as mediator release inhibitors, mediator antagonists and mediator synthesis inhibitors, have been developed. Recently developed compounds such as pranlukast and suplatast are very effective. To relieve the asthmatic attack, bronchodilators such as beta2-adrenoceptor agonists, theophylline and anti-cholinergic drugs are used. Clinical application of tacrolimus ointment has just started for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Recently the number of allergic patients has increased. The onset and development of allergic diseases are considered to be dependent on both the genetic factors and the environmental factors. For the successful treatment of patients with allergic diseases, it is also important to consider the control of environmental factors.

Tacrolimus ointment for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in adult patients: Part I, efficacy

A total of 632 adults with atopic dermatitis applied tacrolimus ointment (0.03% or 0.1%) or vehicle twice daily for up to 12 weeks in two randomized, double-blind studies. This report focuses on the efficacy of tacrolimus ointment in these studies. The mean percent body surface area (%BSA) affected at baseline was 45%, and 56% of patients had severe atopic dermatitis. Evaluations included a physician's global evaluation of clinical response, %BSA affected, individual signs of atopic dermatitis, the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score, and the patient's assessment of pruritus. A 90% or greater improvement from baseline in disease status was observed for 6.6%, 27.5%, and 36.8% of patients in the vehicle, 0.03% tacrolimus ointment, and 0.1% tacrolimus ointment groups, respectively (P < .001), and 50% or better improvement was observed for 19.8%, 61.6%, and 72.7% of patients, respectively. Tacrolimus ointment-treated patients showed significantly greater improvement than vehicle-treated patients for all efficacy parameters evaluated, including the %BSA affected, the total score and individual scores for signs of atopic dermatitis, the patient's assessment of pruritus, and EASI score. The 0.1% concentration was more effective than the 0.03% concentration, particularly in patients with severe disease and/or extensive BSA involvement at baseline and in African Americans. Tacrolimus ointment is an effective therapy for the treatment of adult patients with atopic dermatitis on all skin regions including the head and neck. (J Am Acad Dermatol 2001;44:S28-38.)

Safe and Effective Treatment of Refractory Facial Lesions in Atopic Dermatitis Using Topical Tacrolimus following Corticosteroid Discontinuation

Background: Topical corticosteroids are commonly applied in atopic dermatitis (AD) treatment. However, their chronic use may be associated with significant side effects at the application site. Skin atrophy and other undesirable effects are frequently seen after long-term corticosteroid treatment. In addition, when application of corticosteroids is discontinued, a rebound phenomenon in the facial lesions can occur within several days. Topical tacrolimus, an immunosuppressant currently used to prevent rejection after solid-organ transplantation, presents a potential alternative therapeutic agent for AD. Objective: The present study is the first trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of topically applied tacrolimus ointment after corticosteroid discontinuation without a washout phase in severe, long-term facial AD. Patients/Methods: Forty-seven patients with facial refractory AD were recruited, of whom 38 had undergone topical corticosteroid treatment for at least 4 weeks before enrollment (group 1) and the other 9 had not received steroid treatment (group 2). All 47 patients received 0.1% tacrolimus ointment, and the severity index and pruritus score were assessed as an AD clinical activity index every week and compared with baseline data. Results: Both the severity index and pruritus score improved significantly in group 1 after 1 and 2 weeks of application (p < 0.01, respectively). Group 2 showed the greatest improvement at 4 weeks (p < 0.05). In this trial, none of the patients experienced a rebound phenomenon associated with tacrolimus treatment. A transient sensation of burning at the application site was the only adverse event in 31 of the 47 (66%) enrolled patients, but this condition improved after several days. Spectrophotometric assessment of the facial lesion following treatment revealed significant improvement in group 1 (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The present results indicate that topical tacrolimus treatment following corticosteroid discontinuation is safe and effective in refractory facial AD.

Tacrolimus ointment for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in adult patients: Part II, safety

In two randomized, double-blind, multicenter studies, a total of 631 adult patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis applied tacrolimus ointment (0.03% or 0.1%) or vehicle twice daily for up to 12 weeks. The mean percent body surface area (%BSA) affected at baseline was 45%, and 56% of patients had severe atopic dermatitis. As previously reported, these studies showed that tacrolimus ointment was superior to vehicle for all efficacy parameters measured. This report focuses on the safety of tacrolimus ointment in these studies. The most common adverse events were the sensation of skin burning, pruritus, flu-like symptoms, skin erythema, and headache. Skin burning and pruritus were more common among patients with severe or extensive disease; these events were usually brief and were resolved during the first few days of treatment. Common adverse events with a significantly higher incidence in one or both of the tacrolimus ointment groups than in the vehicle group included skin burning, flu-like symptoms, and headache. More patients in the vehicle group discontinued the study because of an adverse event than in either of the tacrolimus ointment groups. There were no notable or consistent changes in any laboratory variables. Tacrolimus was not detected in 80% of blood samples collected. Measurable concentrations of tacrolimus were transitory and were not associated with adverse events. Tacrolimus ointment is a safe therapy for the treatment of adult patients with atopic dermatitis on the face, neck, or other body regions. (J Am Acad Dermatol 2001;44:S39-46.)

Topical Application of Tacrolimus Ointment Did Not Alter the Cutaneous Pigmentation of Yucatan Micropigs

Tacrolimus is a potent immunosuppressant marketed for the prevention of rejection in liver and kidney transplantation. Topical tacrolimus has been shown to be effective in the treatment of atopic dermatitis, a disease with an immunologic basis, and is currently being developed for this indication. The objective of the current study was to determine whether repeated topical application of tacrolimus ointment could result in hypopigmentation at the application site(s). Each of 10 Yucatan miniature pigs received topical application of 0.03%, 0.1%, and 0.3% tacrolimus ointment, positive control (a combination of 2% 4-hydroxyanisole and 0.01% all-trans-retinoic acid, 4-HAArRA), and a negative control (vehicle placebo) to five test sites (approximately 12.5 cm2) along either side of the dorsal midline (10 sites per animal). Tacrolimus and controls were randomly assigned to the test site on each animal and were applied unoccluded twice daily for 8 weeks at a dose volume of 0.1 ml per site for tacrolimus and vehicle control and 0.025 ml per site for the positive control. Topical application of tacrolimus ointment in concentrations of up to 0.3% for 8 weeks had no effect on the cutaneous pigmentation of Yucatan miniature swine. In contrast, the application of 4-HAArRA produced a statistically significant (P&lt;.05) induction of hypopigmentation from week 4 through the end of the study application.