Application Of Chlorhexidine Gel Research Articles

Chlorhexidine (CHX) Gel Application has Moderate Effect on Salivary Mutans Streptococcal (MS) Levels, but Negligible Caries-Preventive Effect

Caries-Preventive Effect of Chlorhexidine Gel Applications Among High-Risk Children Petti S, Hausen H. Caries Res 2006;40(6):514-21 2b What effect do CHX gels have on MS levels and on visible caries increments? None noted Prospective clinical trial with aspects of a cohort study (high versus low risk based on MS levels) and aspects of a nonrandomized clinical trial (test versus control in the high-risk group)

Effects of EDTA Gel Preconditioning of Periodontally Affected Human Root Surfaces on Chlorhexidine Substantivity – An SEM Study

Infection control is an important requirement during the early stages of periodontal healing. This study was performed to assess the preconditioning effect of EDTA gel on chlorhexidine (CHX) substantivity to periodontally involved root surfaces. Eighty patients with severe chronic periodontitis were enrolled in this study. Following cause-related therapy, patients were divided randomly into four groups. Each group consisted of 20 subjects with one tooth that was diagnosed as hopeless and designated for extraction. In group 1 (G1), selected periodontal pockets were filled with a placebo gel in a silica base for 2 minutes. Exposed roots in group 2 (G2) were etched for 2 minutes with a neutral EDTA conditioning agent, followed by pocket fill with the placebo gel. Pockets in group 3 (G3) were filled with 0.12% CHX digluconate gel in a silica base. Exposed roots in group 4 (G4) were etched for 2 minutes with a neutral EDTA conditioning agent, followed by pocket fill with the CHX gel. Four teeth from each group were extracted immediately and at 3, 12, 24, and 48 hours for SEM evaluation. G1 and G2 specimens showed no evidence of silica adherent to any of the examined root surfaces. At 3 hours following CHX gel application, G3 specimens showed marked reduction in CHX-coated silica. At 24 and 48 hours following EDTA and CHX gel application, G4 specimens demonstrated adherent CHX-coated silica particles despite the reclogging of the tubule orifices. EDTA and CHX gel root conditioning is a valuable regimen that improves CHX substantivity to periodontally involved root surfaces.

Topical minocycline microspheres versus topical chlorhexidine gel as an adjunct to mechanical debridement of incipient peri‐implant infections: a randomized clinical trial

This randomized clinical trial presents a 12-month follow-up of the clinical and microbiological results after application of minocycline microspheres as an adjunct to mechanical treatment of incipient peri-implant infections compared with an adjunctive treatment using 1% chlorhexidine gel application. Thirty-two subjects with probing depth > or =4 mm, combined with bleeding and/or exudate on probing and presence of putative pathogenic bacteria were given oral hygiene instructions and mechanical treatment of infected areas adjacent to implants. The subjects were then randomly assigned adjunctive subgingival antimicrobial treatment using either chlorhexidine gel or minocycline microspheres. Sixteen patients in the minocycline group and 14 in the chlorhexidine group completed the study. Follow-up examinations were carried out after 10 days, 1, 2, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. The adjunctive use of minocycline microspheres resulted in improvements of probing depths and bleeding scores, whereas the adjunctive use of chlorhexidine only resulted in limited reduction of bleeding scores. For the deepest sites of the treated implants in the minocycline group, the mean probing depth was reduced from 5.0 to 4.4 mm at 12 months. This study could not show any significant difference in the levels of bacterial species or groups at any time point between the two antimicrobial agents tested. The present findings encourage further studies on adjunctive use of minocycline microspheres in the treatment of peri-implant lesions. The use of a local antibiotic as an adjunct to mechanical treatment of incipient peri-implantitis lesions demonstrated improvements in probing depths that were sustained over 12 months.

A Systematic Review on the Effects of Subgingival Chlorhexidine Gel Administration in the Treatment of Chronic Periodontitis

Since scaling and root planing are not always successful, predominantly when access to periodontal defects is compromised, various antimicrobial agents as adjuncts have been suggested to enhance their efficacy. Gel vehicles delivering chlorhexidine (CHX) have become available and tested for these indications. An electronic (MEDLINE and Cochrane Oral Health Group Specialized Trials Register) and manual search were made to detect studies concerning the use of chlorhexidine gels as a single measure of treatment and as an adjunct to scaling and root planing. Only full-text randomized controlled trials published in English up to January 2005 were included. Eight studies were finally selected. Due to considerable heterogeneity in study design and outcome variables measured a qualitative data analysis was performed. There is evidence that subgingival chlorhexidine gel administration as a monotherapy temporarily reduces bleeding tendency on probing; a clinical effect coinciding with relevant microbiological changes described in all but one study. To what extent chemical effects contribute to these changes appears to be related to the frequency of gel administration. There seem to be little to no data indicating that the treatment outcome of scaling and root planing will benefit from the adjunctive subgingival administration of a CHX gel. The limited data currently available on the effects of subgingival chlorhexidine gel application do not justify its use in the treatment of chronic periodontitis.

Bacterial penetration in vitro through GTAM membrane with and without topical chlorhexidine application. A light and scanning electron microscopic study.

Premature exposure of membrane in the oral cavity is considered the most common complication as well as a reason for failure or incomplete success of guided tissue regeneration, as the exposed membrane undergoes plaque accumulation. A method to control, or at least to reduce the bacterial invasion of the membrane allowing a delay in the membrane removal, could be of clinical interest. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the possibility of treating, with topical chlorhexidine application, the bacterial colonization of exposed membranes. A special device was developed in order to evaluate, under an experimental environment, the bacterial colonization. This device was made from a removable acrylic denture base to which 5 gold cups were attached. The cups consisted of an internal compartment, isolated from the oral cavity by a GTAM membrane, and an external compartment exposed to the oral environment. 3 healthy subjects had this device fitted, bilaterally, in the molar-premolar region of the upper jaw. The cups of one side of each subject had 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate gel applied 2x a day for 1 min, whereas those of the other side served as controls. 12 cups were removed after 2 weeks and the remainder removed after 1 month. The non-treated control specimens were characterized by greater amounts of plaque accumulation. In all the test sites, plaque deposits increased in thickness and quantity during the 4 weeks of the experiment. Complete invasion of the membrane and initial colonization of its internal surface were observed only in 4-week specimens. A relatively simple flora consisting mainly of cocci and short rods, was found in bacterial deposits forming under the influence of chlorhexidine, whereas in non-treated specimens, it was possible to observe a more mature and complex plaque, composed mostly of filamentous bacteria. In conclusion, topical application of chlorhexidine gel is an effective method of reducing plaque and calculus formation on the surface of GTAM membranes exposed to the oral cavity for up to 4 weeks. This study has, however, failed to demonstrate the capacity of chlorhexidine to prevent or to retard bacterial penetration through the thickness of the inner portion of the membranes.

Comparison of the antimicrobial effect of the application of chlorhexidine gel, amine fluoride gel and stannous fluoride gel in debrided periodontal pockets

The clinical and microbiological effect of locally-applied chlorhexidine gel 2%, amine fluoride gel 1.25%, stannous fluoride gel 4% or placebo gel in 40 periodontal pockets of 10 patients were studied. The gels were applied 3 x within 10 min. after mechanical debridement of the pockets. The treatment effect on the subgingival microflora was evaluated by microscopic and culture studies of the subgingival plaque samples. In addition, supragingival plaque, bleeding after probing and probing pocket depth were scored. Examination were carried out before and during a period of 36 weeks after treatment. At the start, the cultured microflora consisted mainly of anaerobic Gram-positive bacteria. Following treatment, the clinical parameters were significantly reduced. Concomitantly, the %s of spirochetes, motile rods and non-motile rods decreased significantly. A significant decrease was also found in the total anaerobic count, whereas the facultative counts remained at the same level found before treatment. This suggested that the treatment resulted in a mainly facultative subgingival microflora. The % Gram-negative rods showed a significant reduction after treatment, but returned to base line at week 12. Statistical analysis of the bacteriological and clinical examinations failed to demonstrate any significant differences between the 4 treatment groups. Thus, in comparison to the placebo gel, subgingival application of chlorhexidine gel 2%, amine fluoride gel 1.25% or stannous fluoride gel 4% did not augment the effect of mechanical debridement on bacteriological and clinical parameters during the experimental period of 36 weeks. However the indicated treatments resulted in a facultative subgingival microflora which is compatible with the host.

Effects of chlorhexidine gel on periodontal health of abutment teeth in patients with overdentures

The aim of this study was to test the effect of chlorhexidine gel application on periodontal health of abutment teeth in patients with overdentures. 19 patients with immediate overdentures were distributed at random among 2 experimental groups. In these groups, a placebo and chlohexidine gel were daily applied. Patients were recalled at 6-month intervals over a period of 2 years. In both groups, pocket depth, tooth mobility and bleeding index were initially found to decrease after insertion of the overdenture. In the chlorhexidine group, the bleeding index remained very low over the 2-year period. Whereas in the placebo group, the bleeding index gradually returned to the baseline values. The pocket depth in the chlorhexidine group remained below the baseline value, in contrast to values in the control group. The width of the attached gingiva decreased in both the groups, but less in the chlorhexidine group.

Prevention of group B streptococci transmission during delivery by vaginal application of chlorhexidine gel

In a prospective study in 227 parturients, carriership of group B streptococci was established to be 25%. In carriers, transmission of streptococci to the newborn occurred in 50%. 10 ml of a chlorhexidine gel containing hydroxypropylmethylcellulose was introduced into the vagina during labor in 17 parturients, who were known to be carriers of group B streptococci from the first trimester of pregnancy. In none of the newborns from these mothers colonization by group B streptococci did occur. Vaginal application of chlorhexidine may prevent transmission of group B streptococci, and serve as an alternative to intrapartum prophylaxis using antibiotics. A large multicenter randomized controlled study should be performed to confirm this hypothesis.