Appendiceal Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Research Articles

Association of circulating DNA with recurrence in CRS-HIPEC patients with colorectal and appendiceal peritoneal carcinomatosis: Insights from a phase II randomized trial.

3598 Background: There is a need for biomarkers to guide patient selection for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) in cases of peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal and appendiceal cancer. SigNatera is a blood-based quantitative test to detect colorectal cancer recurrence by indicating the presence of at least two altered colorectal cancer-associated genes in Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). We performed a correlative study to help determine if using SigNatera ctDNA would be a predictive and prognostic biomarker of recurrent cancer in patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC on a Phase II Randomized Trial Comparing Morbidity and Mortality of CRS-HIPEC using Mitomycin-C versus Melphalan for Colorectal and Appendiceal Peritoneal Carcinomatosis. Methods: 30 patients on the phase II trial had the option for consenting for the ctDNA correlative study utilizing SigNatera sponsored by Natera. Pre-op samples were collected prior to CRS-HIPEC on Day 0 and post-op samples ~2 weeks post-hospital discharge, followed by every 3 months x 2 years. The exploratory objective of the prognostic impact of ctDNA is evaluated by correlating pre-op ctDNA status and Disease-Free Survival (DFS) Results: All 30 pts that underwent ctDNA testing were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to CRS-HIPEC. Pre-op ctDNA was negative in 20 pts (8 recurrences, median DFS = 15.9 months) and positive in 10 pts (7 recurrences, median DFS = 39.9 months), p =0.19. Of the 20 pre-op ctDNA(-) pts, 18 remained ctDNA(-) in post-op (12 recurrences, median DFS = 15.6 months) and 2 turned ctDNA(+) (0 recurrences). Of the 10 pre-op ctDNA(+) pts, 2 remained ctDNA(+) post-op (1 recurrence, median DFS = 9.5 months) and 8 turned ctDNA(-) (2 recurrences, median DFS = 39.9 months), p=0.1. Conclusions: The unexpected numerically favorable DFS in the pre-op ctDNA(+) group, in comparison to the pre-op ctDNA(-) group, challenges the utility of preop ctDNA status in guiding CRS + HIPEC decision-making. Though limited by small sample size, this finding may be likely due to the impact of post-op therapy which notably converted 10 preop ctDNA(+) pts to post-op ctDNA(-) status. Our findings warrant validation in a larger study to unravel the multifaceted factors influencing ctDNA’s prognostic value. Clinical trial information: NCT03073694 . [Table: see text]

Long term survival analysis after hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with oxaliplatin as a treatment for appendiceal peritoneal carcinomatosis

Background and objectivesComplete cytoreductive surgery (CRS) followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) have been proven to lengthen survival in appendiceal peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC-A). The aim of this study was to analyze survival results of this therapy in our institution over the last 10 years. MethodsData was retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. Treatment consisted of CRS plus HIPEC with oxaliplatin. Ronnett's histologic classification was used (peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis (PMCA), PMCA with intermediate features (PMCA-I) and disseminated peritoneal adenomucinosis (DPAM)). Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) estimates were calculated using Kaplan–Meier survival curves. Results109 patients with PC-A underwent laparotomy with curative intent. Of those, 92 underwent CRS plus HIPEC. Median follow-up was 42 months. The 5 and 10-year OS rates for the HIPEC group were 82.2% and 76.5%. The 5 and 10-year OS estimates for DPAM and PMCA-I subgroups were 100% and 100%, 78.1% and 72.9%, respectively. For the PMCA subgroup, the 3 and 5-year OS were 61.4% and 40.1%, respectively. The 5 and 10-year DFS estimates were 71.9% and 42.7%. ConclusionCRS plus HIPEC with oxaliplatin represent an effective therapeutic approach for PC-A. Long term OS estimates for patients treated at our institution are encouraging.

Factors Predictive of Outcomes after Cytoreductive Surgery and Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colon and Appendiceal Carcinomatosis: A Single-Institution Experience

Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC), although considered an acceptable treatment option in the management of selected patients with colon and appendiceal peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC), concerns about morbidity have limited its acceptance. Our objective was to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of CRS/HIPEC for appendix and colon PC performed at our institution and to elucidate factors predictive of patient outcomes. All patients who underwent CRS/HIPEC for appendix or colon PC from 2011 to 2017 were identified from our institution's prospective database. Postoperative outcomes, overall survival, and recurrence-free survival were assessed. Of 125 patients who underwent CRS/HIPEC during the study period, 45 patients were eligible (appendix n = 26; colon n = 19). The median postoperative length of stay was nine days (5-28 days). Grade III/IV complications occurred in 4/45 (8.8%) patients. There were no postoperative mortalities. Median DFS and overall survival have not yet been reached, in both the colon and appendix groups. As of the study conclusion date, 37/45 (82.2%) patients were alive with or without disease. Lymph node status was predictive of recurrence in appendix PC. In our experience, CRS/HIPEC can be safely performed with acceptable short- and long-term outcomes. Lymph node status is an important predictor of recurrence.

Perioperative Systemic Chemotherapy, Cytoreductive Surgery, and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Patients With Colorectal Peritoneal Metastasis: Results of the Prospective Multicenter Phase 2 COMBATAC Trial

BackgroundCytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) as parts of an interdisciplinary treatment concept including systemic chemotherapy can improve survival of selected patients with peritoneal metastatic colorectal cancer (pmCRC). Nevertheless, the sequence of the therapeutic options is still a matter of debate. Thus, the COMBATAC (COMBined Anticancer Treatment of Advanced Colorectal cancer) trial was conducted to evaluate a combined treatment regimen consisting of preoperative systemic polychemotherapy + cetuximab followed by CRS + HIPEC and postoperative systemic polychemotherapy + cetuximab. Patients and MethodsThe COMBATAC trial is a prospective, multicenter, open-label, single-arm, single-stage phase 2 trial. Twenty-six patients with synchronous or metachronous colorectal or appendiceal peritoneal carcinomatosis were included. Enrollment was terminated prematurely by the sponsor because of slow recruitment. Progression-free survival as primary end point and overall survival were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Also evaluated were morbidity according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 and feasibility of the combined treatment concept. ResultsMedian progression-free survival for the intention-to-treat population (n = 25) was 14.9 months. Median overall survival was not reached during the study duration. Ninety-two adverse events were documented in 16 patients, including 14 serious adverse events in 9 patients. The overall morbidity rate was 64%, and the grade 3/4 morbidity rate was 44%. Of all grade 3/4 morbidity events, 36.4% were related to systemic chemotherapy and 22.7% to surgery, whereas 40.9% were not directly related. There was no treatment-related mortality. ConclusionThe results of the COMBATAC trial show that the multimodal treatment concept consisting of perioperative systemic chemotherapy and CRS + HIPEC is safe and feasible. Progression-free survival in selected patients with colorectal or appendiceal peritoneal metastasis might be improved.

Oncologic Risk Stratification Following Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Appendiceal Carcinomatosis.

Patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) of appendiceal origin demonstrate variable oncologic outcomes, despite aggressive cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC). We sought to devise a prognostic risk stratification system for oncologic outcomes following CRS-HIPEC. A total of 197 patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC for the treatment of appendiceal PC were reviewed from a prospective database. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and multivariate Cox regression models were used to identify prognostic factors affecting oncologic outcomes. Clinicopathologic variables affecting overall survival (OS) were utilized to develop a prognostic staging system and nomograms. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that high-grade tumor histology, lymph node metastasis, and incomplete cytoreduction were high-risk features, adversely affecting OS. Patients were stratified on the presence of high-risk features as follows: low-risk patients had no risk factors (n=102); intermediate-risk patients had one risk factor (n=49); and high-risk patients had more than one risk factor (n=46). Median OS for low-risk patients was not reached, and was 43 and 22months for intermediate-risk and high-risk patients, respectively. Five-year OS was 72, 43, and 13% for low-, intermediate- and high-risk patients, respectively (p<0.0003 for low vs. intermediate risk, and p=0.06 for intermediate vs. high risk). We propose a three-tier staging system for appendiceal PC following CRS-HIPEC, based on histologic grade, lymph node involvement, and completeness of cytoreduction. The presence of any one or more of these high-risk features significantly decreased survival in our single-institution database and provided the basis for a prognostic staging system and corresponding nomograms.

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy + early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy alone: assessment of survival outcomes for colorectal and high-grade appendiceal peritoneal carcinomatosis

BackgroundCytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) have improved survival for colorectal and high-grade appendiceal carcinomatosis. We compared the overall and recurrence-free survival (OS and RFS) of patients treated with HIPEC with mitomycin c and early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC) with fluorouracil versus HIPEC alone using oxaliplatin and simultaneous IV infusion of fluorouracil. MethodsNinety-three patients with colorectal or high-grade appendiceal carcinomatosis were treated with CRS and HIPEC + EPIC or HIPEC alone. OS and RFS were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier curves and log-rank testing. ResultsSurvival did not differ between HIPEC regimens. The 3-year OS and RFS rates were 50% and 21% for HIPEC + EPIC and 46% and 6% for HIPEC alone (P = .72 and P = .89, respectively). HIPEC + EPIC patients experienced more grade III/IV complications (43.2% vs 19.6%, P = .01). ConclusionsThere was no difference in OS and RFS between colorectal and high-grade appendiceal adenocarcinoma patients treated with CRS and HIPEC + EPIC versus HIPEC alone. However, HIPEC + EPIC patients suffered greater morbidity, making HIPEC alone the preferable regimen.

P0147 Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinomatosis at st luke’s medical center: 2-Year experience from a pilot study

Background Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion (CRS + HIPEC) is an evolving treatment option for peritoneal carcinomatosis. Several large centres have consistently shown a significant survival advantage in patients subjected to this aggressive procedure despite its associated morbidity. We present the survival outcomes of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis who were treated with CRS + HIPEC at St Luke’s Medical Center as an early experience in the Philippines. Methods This prospective, phase 2 single-institution study was done on a series of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from primary or recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer, colorectal, and appendiceal adenocarcinoma. Patients underwent CRS with or without HIPEC from January 2012 to December 2013. Patient demographics, tumour histology, peritoneal carcinomatosis index, surgical details, and clinical outcomes were prospectively recorded and reviewed. Findings A total of 35 patients were enrolled with 38 cytoreductive surgeries (35 primary, three secondary) with 28 HIPEC procedures. There were 25 patients with gynaecological peritoneal carcinomatosis (23 ovarian, two tubal), seven with colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis (three appendiceal), and three patients with sarcomatosis. Cytoreduction was completed in 31 patients with a median PCI of 20. Mean operating time was 7.87 h with an average of four major resections/CRS. Major morbidity was observed in 34.29% which included anastomotic leaks, fistulae, and abscesses with a 17.14% reoperation rate. Mortality rate is 5.7% due to cardiogenic shock and pulmonary embolism. With a median follow-up of 7 months, mean overall survival was 16.38 ± 1.89 months with a median disease free survival of 13 months (95% confidence interval 5.65–20.82). The overall 1 year survival rate was 73% (ovarian peritoneal carcinomatosis 73%, colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis 67%, and appendiceal peritoneal carcinomatosis 100%). Interpretation Long-term survival of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis is only achieved with CRS + HIPEC, which carries a significant but acceptable morbidity. The clinical outcomes observed in this early experience approximate those reported in the literature.

Repeated cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in peritoneal carcinomatosis from appendiceal cancer: Analysis of survival outcomes

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS)/hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is the procedure of choice in patients with peritoneal dissemination from appendiceal cancer. Although recurrence rates are 26%-44% after first CRS/HIPEC, the role of repeated CRS/HIPEC has not been well defined. We hypothesize that patients undergoing multiple CRS/HIPEC's have meaningful long term survival. A retrospective study of a prospective database of 294 patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) was conducted, of these 162 had PC of appendiceal origin. Twenty-six of these patients underwent 56 CRS/HIPEC. Survival and outcomes was analyzed. The percentage of patients with pre-surgical PCI scores ≥ 20 for the first, second, and third CRS/HIPEC was 65, 65, and 25%, respectively. Complete cytoreduction (CC 0-1) at first, second, and, third surgeries was 96, 65 and 75%, respectively. The mean operating time was 10.1 h. There was no 30-day peri-operative mortality. Following the first, second, and third CRS/HIPEC 27, 42, and 50% experienced grade III complications, respectively. Mean follow up was 51, 28, and 16 months from the first, second, and third CRS/HIPEC, respectively. Overall survival rate for the first CRS/HIPEC was 100, 83, 54, and 46% at years 1, 3, 5 and 10, respectively; from the second CRS/HIPEC 91, 53, and 34% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively; and from the third CRS/HIPEC was 75% at one year. Repeat CRS/HIPEC can lead to meaningful long term survival rates in patients with appendiceal peritoneal carcinomatosis with morbidity and mortality similar to those of the initial CRS/HIPEC.

Secondary cytoreductive surgery and peri‐operative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal recurrence of colorectal and appendiceal peritoneal carcinomatosis following prior primary cytoreduction

Primary cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and peri-operative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (PIC) is the only curative option for patients with colorectal cancer peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). A significant proportion of patients develop peritoneal recurrence. Outcomes of patients undergoing secondary CRS and PIC for recurrent PC were examined. All patients undergoing second procedures with curative intent for recurrent appendiceal or colorectal cancer PC in three centers were included. Patients with recurrent pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) were excluded. Morbidity and mortality, overall survival, and disease-free survival were primary outcome parameters. The study included 18 patients (13 colorectal and 5 appendiceal cancer). At primary CRS, mean Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) was 9.1. In 13 patients complete resection was achieved. Median time to recurrence was 14 months (range: 1-33). At secondary CRS, mean PCI was 6.3 and CRS was complete in 13 patients. There was no 30-day mortality and 1- and 2-year survival were 74% and 50%, respectively. In 14 patients a recurrence after the second procedure was diagnosed. A secondary CRS for recurrent colorectal or appendiceal cancer PC is safe and feasible, however, relapse is frequent. Further investigations are required to critically assess the efficacy of a secondary procedure and to define optimal patient selection criteria in the era of effective modern chemotherapy.

Comparative analysis of perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy regimen in appendiceal and colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis

Perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (PIC) is delivered by intraoperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC). The relative survival benefits of each or both regimens are explored in this large series of patients undergoing cytoreduction at a single institution. Patients with a complete (CCR0) or optimal (CCR1) cytoreduction who received intraperitoneal chemotherapy for appendiceal and colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis were included for analysis. PIC regimens were delivered according to the treatment protocol. Standardized statistical analyses were performed. Of 262 patients, 98 patients (37%) had colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis, 108 patients (41%) had low-grade pseudomyxoma peritonei and 56 patients (21%) had appendiceal peritoneal carcinomatosis. For pseudomyxoma peritonei, recurrence-free survival (RFS) did not vary with PIC regimen, 5-year survival was 86% in the HIPEC and EPIC group and 64% in the HIPEC or EPIC group (P = 0.070). For appendiceal peritoneal carcinomatosis, RFS and overall survival (OS) did not vary with PIC regimen. For colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis, the median RFS was 33 months in the HIPEC and EPIC group, 19 months in the HIPEC alone group and 20 months in the EPIC alone group (P = 0.046). OS did not vary with PIC regimen. From our experience, without compromising the perioperative morbidity and mortality, PIC consisting of HIPEC and EPIC appears to be associated with potential survival benefits of improved OS in pseudomyxoma peritonei and RFS in colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis.