Previous articleNext article No AccessNotes and CommentsAggregation Does Prevent Competitive Exclusion: A Response to GreenBryan Shorrocks, and Jonathan RosewellBryan Shorrocks Search for more articles by this author , and Jonathan Rosewell Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The American Naturalist Volume 131, Number 5May, 1988 Published for The American Society of Naturalists Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/284819 Views: 4Total views on this site Citations: 14Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1988 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Julio Aguirre, José M. Martín, Juan C. Braga, Christian Betzler, Björn Berning, John S. Buckeridge Densely packed concentrations of sessile barnacles (Cirripedia: Sessilia) from the Early Pliocene of SE Spain, Facies 54, no.22 (Jan 2008): 193–206.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10347-007-0132-2Kazuo H. Takahashi The effect of travel time on oviposition behavior and spatial egg aggregation: experiments with Drosophila, Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 124, no.33 (Sep 2007): 241–248.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.2007.00583.xStephen Hartley, Bryan Shorrocks A general framework for the aggregation model of coexistence, Journal of Animal Ecology 71, no.44 (Jul 2002): 651–662.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2002.00628.x Stephen B. Heard and Lynne C. Remer Clutch‐Size Behavior and Coexistence in Ephemeral‐Patch Competition Models Heard & Remer, The American Naturalist 150, no.66 (Jul 2015): 744–770.https://doi.org/10.1086/286092S. Akimoto Coexistence and weak amensalism of congeneric gall‐forming aphids on the Japanese elm, Population Ecology 37, no.11 (Nov 2018): 81–89.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02515763Dina G. Ruiz-Dubreuil, N�lida K�hler Chromosomal analysis of gregarious oviposition byDrosophila melanogaster, Behavior Genetics 24, no.22 (Mar 1994): 187–190.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067823L.R. Wilhoit Modelling the population dynamics of different aphid genotypes in plant variety mixtures, Ecological Modelling 55, no.3-43-4 (Aug 1991): 257–283.https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3800(91)90090-NBRYAN SHORROCKS Competition on a divided and ephemeral resource: a cage experiment, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 43, no.33 (Jan 2008): 211–220.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1991.tb00594.xBryan Shorrocks, Marc Bingley The problem with zeroes: why don't drosophilids lay eggs?, Oecologia 85, no.11 (Nov 1990): 150–152.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317356 Peter B. Pearman , and Henry M. Wilbur Changes in Population Dynamics Resulting from Oviposition in a Subdivided Habitat, The American Naturalist 135, no.55 (Oct 2015): 708–723.https://doi.org/10.1086/285070Bryan Shorrocks Competition and Selection in a Patchy and Ephemeral Habitat: The Implications for Insect Life-Cycles, (Jan 1990): 215–228.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3464-0_15Steven P. Courtney, Travis T. Kibota, Thomas A. Singleton Ecology of Mushroom-feeding Drosophilidae, (Jan 1990): 225–274.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60056-2H. T. Band Aggregated oviposition byChymomyza amoena (Diptera: Drosophilidae), Experientia 45, no.99 (Sep 1989): 893–895.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01954067WADE B. WORTHEN Predator-mediated coexistence in laboratory communities of mycophagous Drosophila (Diptera: Drosophilidae), Ecological Entomology 14, no.11 (Feb 1989): 117–126.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.1989.tb00761.x