Introduction: Ablation (RFA) of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) arising from the outflow tracts (OT) is estimated to have a success rate of 80–90% in published clinical studies. However, in patients with prior failed ablation, they may be referred for redo RFA at tertiary centers or consideration for epicardial RFA. Understanding the reasons for failure of initial RFA may help improve mapping techniques at initial RFA, success rates of initial RFA, and pre-operative counseling prior to redo RFA regarding procedural expectations (ie, need for epicardial puncture, likelihood of success). Methods: Patients referred for redo RFA to a tertiary care center between 2013–2015 for redo RFA of presumed outflow tract PVCs were included. Included patients had detailed summaries of initial RFA procedure, inferiorly directed PVCs with tall, monophasic R waves in leads II, III, and aVF, and otherwise structurally normal hearts. 4 Results: 55 patients were included (67% male; age 62 + 15 years). All patients had prior failed RFA at referring centers. In detailed reports, 10% had 6/55 (11%) had only reported right ventricular OT (RVOT) mapping, 45/55 (82%) had reported comprehensive mapping of left (LV) and right OTs and coronary sinus (CS), and the remainder had LV and RVOT mapping but no reported CS mapping. 50/55 (91%) of patients had acute success after redo RFA, with 47/55 (85%) with long-time success at 3 month follow-up. No patients had epicardial puncture performed. Of 5 acute failures, 3 were due to proximity to coronary arteries with no RFA delivered, and 2 were due to proximity to the His bundle and concern for risk of heart block. In 3 recurrences, 2 had recurrence of PVCs of a different morphology but also arising from the OT (wider QRS, larger maximum deflection index [MDI], and earlier transition than initial VA), and 1 had recurrence of the same VA. Average procedural time was 45 + 29 minutes. The most common site of successful RFA was at the endocardial aspect of the LV summit (15/50, 30%), LV aspect just beneath the left/right (L/R) junction of the aortic cusps or right cusp (15/50, 30%), endocardial aorto-mitral continuity (10/50, 20%), coronary sinus (5/50, 10%), and supravalvar pulmonary artery (5/50, 10%). No acute complications occurred. All patients with prior RVOT only mapping had a V3 or earlier transition and foci in the LVOT. Conclusion: Redo RFA for OT VAs is common and success rates are high. After initial failed RFA, patients rarely require epicardial puncture and traditional endocardial mapping at less common sites (endocardial LV summit, L/R cusp junction, supravalvar pulmonary artery) may be useful.