Aortobifemoral Bypass Research Articles

Midterm outcomes of aortobifemoral bypass, axillobifemoral bypass and covered endovascular reconstruction of aortic bifurcation.

Aortobifemoral bypass (ABFB) is the gold-standard procedure for aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD). Axillobifemoral bypass (AxBFB) has been alternatively used for revascularization in patients who are deemed high risk for ABFB. However, in the endovascular era, covered endovascular reconstruction of aortic bifurcation (CEARB) is being used frequently in high- and standard-risk patients with AIOD. We aimed to compare the midterm outcomes of ABFB, AxBFB, and CERAB in the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI)-Medicare-Linked database. All patients with AIOD who underwent aortoiliac reconstruction by ABFB, AxBFB or CERAB during 2013-2019 in VQI-Medicare-Linked database were included. The primary outcome was amputation-free survival (AFS). The secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS), limb salvage (LS), and freedom from reintervention (FFR). Outcomes were assessed at one- and three-years. Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox regression were used for the analyses. Three cohorts of patients undergoing ABFB (N=1,906, 60.4%), AxBFB (N=1,077, 34.1%) and CERAB (N=173, 5.5%) were studied. The patients in AxBFB and CERAB cohorts were older than the ABFB cohort and were more likely to have comorbidities compared to their ABFB counterparts. Three-year AFS was 79.4%, 54.6%, 71.1% in ABFB, AxBFB and CERAB cohorts, respectively (P<.001). After adjusting for potential confounders, AxBFB was associated with higher hazards of major amputation/death compared to ABFB at three-year (adjusted Hazard Ratio[aHR]=1.89, 95% Confidence Interval [CI], 1.61-2.23; P<.001) but CERAB was not (aHR=1.27, 95% CI, 0.84-1.91; P=0.251). AxBFB was also associated with higher hazards of major amputation compared to ABFB at three-year (aHR=1.74, 95% CI, 1.05-2.90; P=0.032) but CERAB was not (aHR=2.14, 95% CI, 0.73-6.31; P=0.166). On the other hand, CERAB was associated with increased hazards of three-year reintervention (aHR=1.75, 95% CI, 1.16-2.64; P=0.007) compared to ABFB. CERAB was also associated with lower hazards of major amputation/death at one-year compared to AxBFB (aHR=0.62, 95% CI, 0.38-0.99; P=0.048) but not at three-year. We found that CERAB is comparable to ABFB in terms of OS, LS and AFS, albeit with substantial increase in reintervention rate at three years. AxBFB had worse OS, LS and AFS compared to ABFB. CERAB was associated with higher AFS compared to AxBFB at one-year. This national contemporary study supports the use of CERAB as a safe and durable alternative to ABFB and AxBFB. However, further prospective studies are necessary to confirm our findings.

Unrecognized Rupture of Angioplasty Balloon: A Hidden Underlying Reason for the Delayed Occlusion of the Graft

Rupture of angioplasty balloons is a recognized complication of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), occurring in approximately 5-10% of cases. If a rupture occurs, balloon fragments may embolize or cause thrombotic artery occlusion. Immediate recognition of a damaged balloon allows for prompt surgical or endovascular removal, depending on the patient’s condition and the location of the balloon inside the vessel. However, unrecognized balloon rupture with delayed symptoms is rare. We present a case of acute lower limb ischemia in a patient with a prior aortobifemoral reconstruction. Several years after an aortobifemoral bypass due to a failing right limb graft, endovascular graft treatment was performed. Eight years later, the patient required surgical treatment for acute ischemia, during which a piece of cup-shaped remnants from a ruptured balloon was found, with a confirmed circumferential balloon tear. Successful surgical extraction restored adequate inflow. The literature reports successful percutaneous retrieval of balloon fragments using techniques such as endoscopic biopsy forceps, grasping forceps, and subintimal angioplasty, but in our case, neither the rupture nor the balloon remnants were identified during the PTA procedure or on angiography eight years later. The retained fragment ultimately caused acute ischemia and limb graft occlusion, necessitating surgical intervention

TECHNIQUE AND LONG-TERM RESULTS OF LAPAROSCOPIC AORTO-BI-FEMORAL BYPASS FOR JUXTA-RENAL AORTIC OCCLUSION

Describe the technique and the long-term results of total laparoscopic aorto-bifemoral bypass for juxtarenal aortic occlusion (JRAO). From December 2000 to January 2024, 16 patients with a JRAO (TASC D lesions) underwent total laparoscopic aorto-bifemoral bypass. The patients' database was prospective and the file analysis was retrospective. Median age was 61 years (33-79). Ten patients had debilitating intermittent claudication, and 6 patients had severe critical ischemia. All patients were operated on through a laparoscopic left retrorenal approach. One conversion to open surgery was performed. Median operative time was 315 min (240-470). Median total aortic clamping time was 97.5 min (53-140). Median suprarenal aortic clamping time was 16 min (4-23). No hospital mortality nor severe systemic complications occurred. We observed variations in renal function during hospitalization and during the follow-up. However, no patients required early or long-term dialysis. Median follow-up was 116 months (1-213). Two patients developed bilateral femoral pseudoaneurysms (43rd and 186th months). No patient developed false aortic aneurysm. An aortobifemoral bypass was occluded on an antiphospholipid syndrome (152nd month). Eight patients died during the follow-up. This series shows that total laparoscopic aortic approach of JRAO is feasible and safe in good surgical risk patients. It represents an additional approach of JRAO at the era of complex endovascular procedures.

Development and Validation of a 30-Day Point-Scoring Risk Calculator for Open Groin Vascular Surgery: The George Washington Groin Score

BackgroundOpen groin vascular surgeries are important in managing peripheral arterial diseases. Given its inherent risks and the diverse patient profiles, there is a need for risk assessment tools. This study aimed to develop a 30-d point-scoring risk calculator for patients undergoing open groin vascular surgeries. MethodsPatients underwent open groin vascular surgery, including aortobifemoral, axillofemoral, femorofemoral, iliofemoral, femoral-popliteal, and femoral-tibial bypass as well as thromboendarterectomy, were identified in American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2005 to 2021. Patients were randomly sampled into experimental (2/3) and validation (1/3) groups. The George Washington (GW) groin score, a weighted point-scoring system, was developed for 30-d mortality from multivariable regression on preoperative risk variables by Sullivan's method. GW groin score was subjected to internal and external validation. Furthermore, the effectiveness of GW groin score was evaluated in 30-d major surgical complications. ResultsA total of 129,424 patients were analyzed, with 86,715 allocated to experimental group and 42,709 to validation group. GW groin score is derived as follows: aortobifemoral bypass (2 points), axillofemoral bypass (1 point), age (>75 y, 2 points; 65-75 y, 1 point), disseminated cancer (2 points), emergent presentation (1 point), American Society of Anesthesiology score 4 or 5 (1 point), dialysis (1 point), and preoperative sepsis (1 point).GW groin score exhibited robust discrimination (c-statistic = 0.794, 95% CI = 0.786-0.803) and calibration (Brier score = 0.029). The transition from individual preoperative variables (c-statistic = 0.809, 95% CI = 0.801-0.818) to the point-scoring system was successful and external validation of the score was confirmed (c-statistic = 0.789, 95% CI = 0.777-0.801, Brier score = 0.030). Furthermore, GW groin score can effectively discriminate major surgical complications. ConclusionsThis study developed GW groin score, a concise and comprehensive 10-point risk calculator. This well-validated score demonstrates robust discriminative and predictive abilities for 30-d mortality and major surgical complications following open groin vascular surgeries. GW groin score can anticipate potential perioperative complications and guide treatment decisions.

Endograft Thrombosis as an Indication for Open Conversion after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair in a Multicenter Experience over 25 Years

To describe the outcomes of aortic endograft thrombosis (AET) as an indication for open conversion (OC) after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) in a multicenter experience. This study retrospectively analyzed cases of OC for AET following EVAR across 12 Italian Vascular Surgery centers from 1997 to September 2022. The end points were as follows: 30-day mortality and major postoperative complications. Follow-up data included survival and aortic-related complications. Sixteen patients (mean age: 68.6±8.5years) were included. The median elapsed time between EVAR and OC was 26.46months (interquartile range: 13.8-45.9). Proximal aortic cross-clamping site was supraceliac in 8 out of 16 (50%) patients, and complete removal of the stentgraft was achieved in 75% of cases (12/16 patients). Reconstructions were aorto-bi-iliac grafts in 8 cases (50%), 7 aortobifemoral bypass grafts (43.8%), and 1 aortoaortic tube graft (6.3%). All patients were symptomatic at presentation (68.7% unilateral acute limb ischemia, 25% bilateral acute limb ischemia, 1 patient had chronic severe claudication). Thirty-day mortality was 12.5% (2/16 patients). The overall morbidity rate was 43.8% (7 of 16 patients). No specific risk factors for early mortality were found. The overall estimated survival rate was 80.4% at 1year, 62.5% at 2years, and 41.7% at 3years. OC for AET is typically reserved for complex cases that are not amenable to endovascular solutions. The frequent need for suprarenal clamping and complete endograft removal seems to be associated with high short-term mortality.

Analysis of Midterm Readmissions and Related Costs after Open and Endovascular Procedures for Aorto-Iliac Occlusive Disease.

Background. Readmissions rates and costs were analysed over follow-up for patients who underwent open or endovascular procedures for aorto-iliac occlusive disease (AIOD). Methods. Patients who underwent aorto-bifemoral bypass (ABF) or covered kissing stent (CKS) for AIOD from May 2008 to February 2018 were compared in terms of readmission rates, related costs expressed in EUR, freedom from generic readmission (FFGR), and freedom from readmission for surgical reasons (FFRS). Results. ABF had a readmission rate of 16% and CKS of 18% (p = 0.999). The most common cause of readmission was prosthesis limb or stent occlusion. Time to readmission was longer for ABF (35 months [21-82] vs. 13.5 months [1-68.7] in the CKS group, p = 0.334). CKS group had higher cumulative re-hospitalisation, ICU stay, and reintervention costs (11569 ± 2216 SEM, 2405 ± 1125, 5264 ± 1230, respectively) and a trend for more readmissions in the first 36 months, without reaching significance. Conclusion. This study reports on a period of time exceeding ninety days. Even if not reaching significance, the CKS group presented a higher trend in readmissions till 36 months and a higher trend in readmission costs, while time-to-readmission was longer in the ABF group.

Changes in the Remaining Iliac Artery According to Retrograde Flow after Aorto-Femoral Bypass in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Considering a patient's anatomy and vascular conditions, aorto-femoral bypass is a treatment approach for the open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. This study aimed at evaluating changes in the remnant iliac artery and their correlation with the preservation state of retrograde flow from femoral anastomosis. Of 221 patients who underwent abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery between 2007 and 2022 in Pusan National University Hospital, 29 patients who underwent aorto-femoral bypass were included in this retrospective cohort study. Of these patients, 21 underwent aortobifemoral bypass and 8 underwent aortoiliac-and-femoral bypass. The change in size of the iliac artery from preoperative to postoperative and whether this difference in size depended on the status of postoperative retrograde flow were investigated. Additionally, factors affecting overall mortality and ischemic complications were identified. The median duration from operation to the last follow-up was 2069.5days (about 5.7years). The average age of the patients was 78.1years, and the proportion of males was 75.9%. In cases of disappearance of postoperative retrograde flow from the femoral anastomosis, the postoperative iliac artery size was significantly reduced compared to its preoperative size (18.4±18.9mm vs. 13.2±7.9mm, respectively; P=0.04). The group with maintained retrograde flow had significantly larger residual common iliac artery size than the group with disappearance of flow. (20.0±28.0mm vs. 14.6±8.5mm, respectively; P=0.02). Disappearance of retrograde flow was a significant factor in the iliac artery size reduction after surgery (odds ratio, 2.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.9-5.3; P=0.02). Three patients with maintained retrograde flow (18.8%) required intervention owing to an increase in the size of the iliac artery. The factors that significantly influenced overall death as analyzed by Cox proportional hazard regression were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (hazard ratio, 36.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-870.0; P=0.03), peripheral arterial occlusive disease (hazard ratio, 12.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-115.8; P=0.02), and disappearance of retrograde flow (hazard ratio, 8.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-63.9; P=0.03). Among the open repair methods for abdominal aortic aneurysms, if retrograde flow was not maintained through femoral anastomosis when aorto-femoral bypass was performed, the size of the remaining iliac artery decreased. However, loss of retrograde flow increased long-term mortality. When aorto-femoral bypass is performed, regular imaging follow-up is necessary at appropriate intervals to check the remnant iliac artery and retrograde flow.

Comparative Analysis of Outcomes of Unibody Endoprosthesis and Aortobifemoral Bypass for Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease

Aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) has traditionally been treated with aortobifemoral bypass (ABF). Unibody endograft (UBE) for AIOD, however, has been increasingly utilized in selected patients. We report outcomes of patients undergoing ABF or UBE for AIOD. Patients (2016-2021) undergoing elective ABF or UBE with a unibody device for AIOD were identified at an academic institution. Chi-square and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used to evaluate outcomes by group. One hundred thirty-one patients undergoing UBE or ABF were screened, with 82 included. Twenty-one patients underwent UBE (25.6%) and 61 (74.4%) underwent ABF. UBE patients were older (63.8 vs. 58.2years; P=0.01), with a higher prevalence of diabetes (52.4 vs. 19.7%; P=0.004). Significant differences were seen between UBE and ABF including a shorter surgery length (214 vs. 360min; P=0.0001), less blood loss (300 vs. 620mls; P=0.001), larger minimum aortic diameter (14.6 vs. 12.6; P=0.0006), larger common iliac artery (9.5 vs. 7.9; P=0.005) and lower postoperative ankle-brachial index (0.8 vs. 0.9; P=0.04). There were no differences in TASC C/D iliac lesions in the UBE than ABF group (66.6% vs. 63.9%; P<0.82) or Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus classification femoropopliteal lesions. Unadjusted analysis revealed no significant differences between UBE and ABF for 30-day mortality (0 vs. 1.6%; P=1), stroke (0 vs. 3.3%; P=1), or major adverse cardiac events (4.8 vs. 4.9%; P=1). There were no significant differences in mid-term surgical outcomes over a mean follow-up period of 23.7months between UBE and ABF groups; specifically endovascular (0 vs. 8.2%; P=0.3) or open/hybrid reintervention (9.5 vs. 14.8%; P=0.7) with similar limb occlusion (4.8 vs. 27.8; P=0.12). Kaplan-Meier estimated primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency at 36months were similar with 94%, 100%, and 94% for UBE and 86%, 95%, and 86% for ABF, respectively. Estimated survival at 36months was 95% for UBE and 97% for ABF (P=0.8). Equivalent outcomes were seen between AIOD treated with UBE or ABF in similar patient populations. Mid-term outcomes such as reintervention and patency are similar for UBE and ABF. We still recommend ABF over UBE as a primary modality of treatment in surgically fit patients with greater complexity aortoiliac lesions and with smaller arterial diameters, especially women.

Aortobifemoral bypass vs covered endovascular reconstruction of aortic bifurcation

BackgroundCovered endovascular reconstruction of aortic bifurcation (CERAB) is increasingly used as a first line-treatment in patients with aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD). We sought to compare the outcomes of patients who underwent CERAB compared with the gold standard of aortobifemoral bypass (ABF). MethodsThe Vascular Quality Initiative was queried for patients who underwent ABF or CERAB from 2009 to 2021. Propensity scores were generated using demographics, comorbidities, Rutherford class, and urgency. The two groups were matched using 5-to-1 nearest-neighbor match. Our primary outcomes were 1-year estimates of primary patency, major adverse limb events (MALEs), MALE-free survival, reintervention-free survival, and amputation-free survival. Standard statistical methods were used. ResultsA total of 3944 ABF and 281 CERAB cases were identified. Of all patients with AIOD, the proportion of CERAB increased from 0% to 17.9% between 2009 and 2021. Compared with ABF, patients who underwent CERAB were more likely to be older (64.7 vs 60.2; P < .001) and more often had diabetes (40.9% vs 24.1%; P < .001) and end-stage renal disease (1.1% vs 0.3%; P = .03). In the matched analysis (229 CERAB vs 929 ABF), ABF patients had improved MALE-free survival (93.2% [±0.9%] vs 83.2% [±3%]; P < .001) and lower rates of MALE (5.2% [±0.9%] vs 14.1% [±3%]; P < .001), with comparable primary patency rates (98.3% [±0.3%] vs 96.6% [±1%]; P = .6) and amputation-free survival (99.3% [±0.3%] vs 99.4% [±0.6%]; P = .9). Patients in the CERAB group had significantly lower reintervention-free survival (62.5% [±6%] vs 92.9% [±0.9%]; P < .001). Matched analysis also revealed shorter length of stay (1 vs 7 days; P < .001), as well as lower pulmonary (1.2% vs 6.6%; P = .01), renal (1.8% vs 10%; P < .001), and cardiac (1.8% vs 12.8%; P < .001) complications among CERAB patients. ConclusionsCERAB had lower perioperative morbidity compared with ABF with a similar primary patency 1-year estimates. However, patients who underwent CERAB experienced more major adverse limb events and reinterventions. Although CERAB is an effective treatment for patients with AIOD, further studies are needed to determine the long-term outcomes of CERAB compared with the established durability of ABF and further define the role of CEARB in the treatment of AIOD.

Comparative outcomes of aortobifemoral bypass with or without previous endovascular kissing stenting of the aortoiliac bifurcation

ObjectiveThe aim of this multicenter national study was to compare the outcomes of primary open surgery by aorto-bifemoral bypass (ABFB) with those performed after a failed endovascular treatment (EVT) by kissing stent technique for complex aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) lesions (TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus [TASC] II C and D). MethodsAll consecutive ABFB cases carried out at 12 vascular surgery centers between 2016 and 2021 were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Data included patients’ baseline demographics and clinical characteristics, procedural details, perioperative outcomes, and follow-up results (survival, patency, amputation). The study cohort was divided into two groups based on indications for ABFB: primary treatment vs secondary treatment after EVT failure. ResultsOverall, 329 patients underwent ABFB during the study period (71% males; mean age, 64 years), of which 285 were primary treatment and 44 were after prior EVT. At baseline, no significant differences were found between study groups in demographics and clinical characteristics. TASC C and D lesions were similarly represented in the study groups (TASC C: 22% vs 78%; TASC D: 16% vs 84%). No major differences were found between study groups in terms of procedural details, early mortality, and perioperative complications. At 5 years, primary patency rates were significantly higher for primary ABFB (88%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 93.2%-84%) as compared with ABFB after prior EVT (69%; 95% CI 84.9%-55%; log rank P value < .001); however, the 5-year rates of secondary patency (100% vs 95%; 95% CI, 100%-86%) and limb salvage (97%; 95% CI, 99%-96 vs 97%; 95% CI, 100%-94%) were similar between study groups. ConclusionsSurgical treatment of TASC C/D AIOD with ABFB seems to be equally safe and effective when performed after prior EVT, although primary ABFB seemed to have higher primary patency rates. Despite the need for more frequent reinterventions, secondary patency and limb salvage rates were similar. However, future large prospective trials are required to confirm these findings.

Aortobifemoral Bypass in Kidney Transplant Candidates: A Ten-Year Experience.

In patients with severe aorto-iliac calcifications, vascular reconstructions can be performed in order to allow kidney transplantation. The aim of this study was to analyze the outcomes of kidney transplant candidates who underwent an aortobifemoral bypass (ABFB) for aorto-iliac calcifications. A retrospective study including all kidney transplant candidates who underwent an ABFB between 2012 and 2022 was performed. Primary outcome was 30-day morbidity-mortality after ABFB. Secondary outcome was accessibility to kidney transplant waiting list. Twenty-two ABFBs were performed: 10 ABFBs in asymptomatic patients presenting severe aorto-iliac circumferential calcifications without hemodynamic consequences, and 12 ABFBs in symptomatic patients in whom aorto-iliac calcifications were responsible for claudication or critical limb threatening ischemia. Overall 30-day mortality was 0%. Overall 30-day morbidity was 22.7%: 1 femoral hematoma and 1 retroperitoneal hematoma requiring surgical drainage in the asymptomatic group, and 2 digestive ischemia requiring bowel resection and 1 femoral hematoma requiring surgical drainage in the symptomatic group. Among the 22 patients, 20 patients could access to kidney waiting list and 8 patients underwent a kidney transplantation, including 3 living-donor transplantations. Aorto-iliac revascularization can be an option to overcome severe calcifications contraindicating kidney transplantation.

Mini-access ascending aorto-bifemoral bypass surgery for the treatment of aortic steno-occlusive disease

ObjectivesMid-aortic syndrome is a rare condition characterized by severe aortic narrowing, leading to high upper body blood pressure and organ hypoperfusion, necessitating surgical intervention. Although central bypassing is considered ideal, it involves extensive incisions. To overcome these limitations, less-invasive approaches have been developed. This study aims to introduce a mini-access approach using video-endoscopy and to evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of mini-access ascending aorto-bifemoral bypass surgery. MethodsFrom November 2020 to May 2022, we performed ascending aorta to bifemoral artery bypass operations on 7 patients to treat steno-occlusive diseases in the downstream aorta. A Y-graft was created, and procedures were conducted under general anesthesia using video-endoscopy with limited skin incisions. ResultsIntraoperatively, there were no major complications, and none of the patients required cardiopulmonary bypass support. Furthermore, there were no postoperative mortalities or major complications. Postoperatively, the mean ankle-brachial index significantly improved from 0.59/0.59 to 0.96/0.92 (P = .004), and the mean glomerular filtration rate increased from 61.1 to 85.3 mL/min/1.73 mm2 (P = .012). Additionally, symptoms of claudication resolved in all patients. ConclusionsVideoscope-assisted mini-access aortic bypass surgery not only provides favorable early postoperative outcomes but also represents a technically feasible alternative to traditional surgical approaches for the treatment of steno-occlusive aortic diseases.

Veliki neželjeni kardiovaskularni događaji kod vaskularnih hirurških pacijenata sa perifernom arterijskom bolešću

Introduction: Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) are the primary cause of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing vascular surgical procedures. This is why it is essential to understand the relationship between coronary artery disease and peripheral arterial disease. In this paper, we aimed to determine predictors and risk factors related to the occurrence of MACE in patients undergoing vascular surgery for peripheral arterial disease. Material and Methods: This is a retrospective study of 310 in-hospital patients treated at a high-volume vascular centre. The outcome was classified through the three-point MACE (myocardial infarction, stroke and cardiovascular mortality). Results: We found that the majority of initial MACE happened in patients with aortobifemoral bypass surgery compared to other types of reconstruction (p=0.009). No significant correlation was established between the procedures performed and the short-term primary outcome. In the initial period, MACE was detected in 14 (5.8%) patients. Among them, six (1.9%) experienced a myocardial infarction (MI), three (1%) had a stroke, and five (1.6%) died within the first 30 days. All deaths were linked to cardiac ischemia, which ultimately culminated in cardiogenic shock and subsequent death. Short term MACE was observed in 2 (0.6%) patients both of whom had an MI. Conclusion: Major vascular surgery in patients with coronary artery disease is a highly morbid procedure and perioperative MACE places them at a significantly high risk of mortality. Early detection of coronary heart disease and preoperative optimization can play a major role in reducing the risk of MACE.

Outcomes of Surgical Revascularization in Trans-Atlantic Society Consensus (TASC II) Type C &amp; D Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease

Introduction: Aortoiliac occlusive disease is a disabling illness. This study was conducted on the patients of Trans-Atlantic Society Consensus (TASC II) type C &amp; D aortoiliac occlusive disease. Open surgical revascularization in the form of aortofemoral and aorto-bifemoral bypass grafting was done and the demography of patients of AIOD, the efficacy and outcomes of open surgical bypass in the patients of TASC II, type C &amp; D aortoiliac occlusive disease was studied. Methods: in this study, total of 52 patients were revascularized and were observed for various parameters thoroughly throughout the course of diagnosis, preoperative, intra-operative and postoperative phase and until 6 months of follow-up. The demographics, clinical characteristics of the patients, co-morbid conditions, type of aorto-iliac occlusive disease (AIOD), the surgical procedure conducted and the outcomes of surgery in terms of limb salvageability, healing of ulcer, relief of claudication and graft patency were observed. Results: 50 (96.16%) out of 52 patients were males, with a mean age of presentation 55.01 + 8.58 years. 47 (90.38%) were smokers, 43 (82.69%) had hypertension, 17 (32.69%) had diabetes, 11 (21.15%) had CAD, 12 (23.07%) had COPD, 22 (42.30%) had type C and 30 (57.69%) patients had type D disease. Aorto-bifemoral bypass grafting was done in 42 (80.76%) . Mean duration of ICU stay was 1.9 days, 6 (11.53%) patients expired postoperatively. The graft patency and limb salvageability were 100% and 96.15% respectively during 1st, 3rd and 6th months of follow-up with complete healing of ulcers in 21 (91.30%) patients by the end of 6 months. Conclusion: Surgical revascularization is an important, high yielding, life changing intervention which serves as a boon for the patients with extensive or advanced aortoiliac disease. The surgery has excellent outcomes in terms of graft patency as well as limb salvageability.

Case report on adhesive intestinal obstruction secondary to aortofemoral bypass

Introduction: Aorto-iliac occlusive disease is frequently treated by endovascular approach as a first option. But due to failure of revascularization or recurrence, aorto-femoral bypass surgery remains another therapeutic alternative; however, adhesive bowel obstruction may be one of its infrequent complications. Case presentation: A 51 year old patient, operated for aorto-iliac occlusive disease one year ago, having benefited from aorto-bifemoral bypass surgery, then put on anticoagulants and anti-platelet aggregants, presented to the emergency room for an occlusive syndrome that had appeared for 3 days, The abdominal CT scan showed a bowel obstruction with a closed loop mechanism upstream of a stenosing digestive parietal thickening without any sign of suffering, presence of an effusion, presence of a sub-renal aorto-femoral birth: He was admitted to our hospital and underwent an exploratory laparotomy.

Sexual dysfunction after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: 16 years' experience in a quaternary center and literature review.

Open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair can lead to sexual dysfunction (SD) in men. To determine the prevalence of SD following open AAA repair, explore whether surgical techniques for aortic reconstruction can have a differential impact on the occurrence of SD, and summarize current knowledge in this field. Retrospective review of 100 patients submitted to open AAA repair between 1995 and 2010 in a quaternary center. Sexual dysfunction was assessed according to questions from the modified International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), considering the condition before surgical repair and 3 months after surgery. The chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, and Student's t test were used for statistical analyses. 100 patients were included (mean age = 66.4 years old). Normal sexual activity, no sexual activity, erectile dysfunction, and retrograde ejaculation with preserved erectile function were found in 36%, 21%, 18%, and 24% of patients, respectively. The group of patients with no sexual activity was older (mean age = 72.3 years old vs 64.5 years old, p < 0.001). Erectile dysfunction prevalence was higher in patients submitted to an aorto-bifemoral bypass (p = 0.032). Retrograde ejaculation was more frequent in patients submitted to an aorto-aortic bypass (p = 0.007). Sexual function is a frequent condition intimately associated with the aortic reconstruction technique. The literature review found contradictory results regarding whether the endovascular approach is protective compared with open repair, but clearly demonstrated the importance of techniques targeting preservation of the internal iliac artery and the superior hypogastric plexus.

Aortic endarterectomy in patients with severe multivessel paravisceral and aortoiliac occlusive disease

ObjectiveAortic endarterectomy (AE), once a treatment of choice for aortoiliac occlusive disease, is now rarely performed in favor of endovascular procedures or open aortobifemoral bypass. However, in select patients with paravisceral or aortoiliac occlusive disease, AE remains a viable alternative for revascularization, either as a primary procedure or after prior interventions have failed. Here, we evaluated outcomes for an extended series of patients undergoing paravisceral or aortoiliac endarterectomy, demonstrating that these procedures can be an excellent alternative with acceptable morbidity and mortality in properly selected patients. MethodsA single institution retrospective review of 20 patients who underwent AE from 2017 to 2023 was performed. ResultsFive patients (25%) underwent paravisceral endarterectomy and 15 (75%) underwent aortoiliac endarterectomy. There were no perioperative mortalities. One paravisceral patient died 3 months postoperatively from complications of pneumonia. Three patients in the paravisceral group required reinterventions; one acutely due to thrombosis of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) requiring extension of the endarterectomy and patch angioplasty on postoperative day 0, one due to stenosis at the distal edge of the endarterectomy 1 month postoperatively, successfully treated with SMA stenting, and one at 10-month follow-up due to SMA stenosis at the distal aspect of the endarterectomy, also successfully treated with SMA stenting. With these reinterventions, the 1-year primary patency in the paravisceral group was 40%, primary-assisted patency was 80%, and secondary patency was 100%. In the aortoiliac group, 1-year primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency were 91%, 91%, and 100%, respectively. One patient developed iliac thrombosis 10 days postoperatively owing to an intimal flap distal to the endarterectomy site. She and one other patient, a young man with an undefined hypercoagulable disorder, ultimately required neoaortoiliac reconstructions at 18 and 32 months postoperatively, respectively (the latter in the setting of stopping anticoagulation). The remaining 13 patients experienced no complications. All patients had rapid resolution of clinical symptoms, and median postoperative ankle-brachial indexes of 1.06 on the right and 1.00 on the left, representing a median improvement from preoperative ankle-brachial indexes of +0.59 on the right and +0.56 on the left (P < .01 and P < .01). ConclusionsIn this series of 20 patients undergoing paravisceral and infrarenal aortoiliac endarterectomy, AE was associated with no perioperative mortality, relatively low and manageable morbidity, and excellent clinical outcomes in patients with both paravisceral and aortoiliac occlusive disease. SMA-related early reintervention was not uncommon in the paravisceral group, and attention should be given particularly to the distal endarterectomy site. AE remains a viable treatment for severe multivessel paravisceral or aortoiliac occlusive disease isolated to the aorta and common iliac arteries in select patients.

Surveillance After Surgical and Endovascular Treatment for Peripheral Artery Disease: a Dutch Survey

At present, there is no clear, optimal approach to surveillance after invasive treatment of peripheral artery disease (PAD) in terms of modality, duration, clinical benefit, and cost effectiveness. The ongoing debate on the clinical benefit and cost effectiveness of standard surveillance creates a clear knowledge gap and may result in overtreatment or undertreatment. In this study, a survey was conducted among vascular surgeons in the Netherlands to assess the currently applied surveillance programmes. All vascular surgeons from the Dutch Society for Vascular Surgery received an online survey on follow up after open and endovascular revascularisation in patients with PAD. Surveillance was defined as at least one follow up visit after intervention with or without additional imaging or ankle brachial index (ABI) measurement. Ten types of PAD interventions were surveyed. Surveys were returned by 97 (46.2%) of 210 vascular surgeons, and 76% reported using a routine follow up protocol after an invasive intervention. Clinical follow up only is most commonly performed after femoral endarterectomy (53%). After peripheral bypass surgery, clinical follow up only is applied rarely (4 - 8%). In 6 of the 10 interventions surveyed, duplex ultrasound (DUS) is the most used imaging modality for follow up. After bypass surgery, 76 - 86% of vascular surgeons perform DUS with or without ABI measurement. After endovascular interventions, 21 - 60% perform DUS surveillance. Lifelong surveillance is most applied after aortobifemoral bypass (57%). Surveillance frequency and duration vary greatly within the same intervention. Frequencies range from every 3 months or 6 months to annually. Duration ranges from one time surveillance to lifelong follow up. There is significant practice variation in surveillance after surgical and endovascular treatment of patients with PAD in the Netherlands. We recommend the initiation of prospective studies to evaluate treatment outcomes and to define the clinical need and cost effectiveness of standardised surveillance programmes for patients with PAD.

Trapdoor endarterectomy for coral reef plaque of the paravisceral aorta in the modern era

Coral reef atherosclerosis of the paravisceral aorta is a rare disease whose description is confined to before contemporary vascular surgical techniques. This study aims to describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients with coral reef aorta treated with trapdoor endarterectomy at a single high-volume quaternary referral center since 2010. From 2010 to 2022, 14 patients with coral reef aorta were treated with trapdoor endarterectomy. The patient data were obtained via a retrospective medical record review. The patients were predominantly women (79%) with a median age of 65 years (interquartile range [IQR], 60-70 years). The patients universally had a tobacco smoking history and hypertension. More than 85% had previously diagnosed carotid stenosis. Two patients (14%) had undergone prior aortofemoral reconstruction, and one patient (7%) had undergone prior axillobifemoral bypass. The most common presenting symptoms were claudication (71%), chronic mesenteric ischemia (50%), and renovascular hypertension (43%). Of the 14 patients, 8 (57%) underwent isolated endarterectomy and 6 (43%) underwent concomitant aortobifemoral bypass. In addition, 13 patients (93%) required a supraceliac aortic clamp position with a median clamp time of 23 minutes (IQR, 20-30 minutes). The median estimated blood loss was 1650 mL (IQR, 1025-3000 mL). A cell saver was used in 13 procedures (93%), with a median transfusion of 563 mL (IQR, 231-900 mL). The median operative time was 341 minutes (IQR, 315-416 minutes). Eight patients (57%) experienced acute kidney injury in the postoperative period with a peak creatinine of 1.96 mg/dL (IQR, 1.50-2.84 mg/dL). The median length of stay was 11 days (IQR, 6-16 days), with an intensive care unit stay of 4 days (IQR, 2-7 days). One patient (7%) required reoperation in the immediate perioperative period for a retroperitoneal hematoma. The postoperative ankle brachial index increased from a median of 0.58 (right) and 0.57 (left) bilaterally in the preoperative period to 1.09 (right) and 1.10 (left) postoperatively. Eight patients (57%) had follow-up data available for >2 years postoperatively, with five patients (36%) having follow-up data available for >3 years. Two major adverse cardiac events were reported at the last follow-up. One patient reported mild recurrent symptoms of chronic mesenteric ischemia during 3 years of postoperatively, with no concurrent imaging findings or loss of patency found on computed tomography angiography. Symptomatic coral reef atherosclerosis of the paravisceral aorta is a complex disease rarely encountered even at high-volume referral centers. These patients can be expected to experience short-term postoperative morbidity and require intensive care. Despite these challenges, trapdoor endarterectomy is a safe and effective procedure for coral reef aorta, and most patients achieve dramatic symptomatic improvement with durable results.

Our Experience of Renovisceral Interventions in Patients Undergoing Aortobifemoral Bypass for Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease

Abstract Introduction: Aortobifemoral bypass is the standard recommended procedure for aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD). Patients of AIOD presenting with claudication pain and tissue loss require revascularization of lower limbs, with few requiring mesenteric and/or renal revascularization. Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of patients undergoing aortobifemoral bypass with mesenteric/renal revascularization in patients of AIOD with mesenteric/renal occlusion. Objective: The objectives of this study were as follows: (1) restoration of normal renal function in terms of urine output and renal function test in patients who underwent mesenteric revascularization and (2) resolution of abdominal angina in patients who underwent mesenteric revascularization. Methods: A total of 13 patients with a mean age of 45.8 years, presenting with critical limb ischemia with renal/mesenteric occlusion due to AIOD of Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus D type, underwent aortobifemoral bypass with renal/mesenteric revascularization. The demographics of patients, Rutherford stage and WIFI stage, pre- and postoperative ABI, probable etiology, any renovisceral interventions done, duration of procedure, type of renal ischemia (warm/cold), duration of renal ischemia, postoperative complications, duration of stay, patency of graft, wound infection, amputation rates, and mortality were documented on a structured pro forma. Five (38.46%) patients presented with severe claudication, 3 (23.07%) patients with rest pain, and the remaining 5 (38.46%) patients with minor tissue loss. Along with AIOD, 3 (23.07%) patients had concomitant bilateral femoropopliteal disease and tibial vessel disease, 3 (23.07%) patients had unilateral femoropopliteal disease, and 2 (15.38%) patients had bilateral tibial vessel disease. Three (23.07%) patients had infrarenal aortoiliac occlusion and 10 (76.9%) patients had juxtarenal aortoiliac occlusion (managed using Liddicoat/Madiba–Robbs technique). Outcomes were assessed in terms of graft patency, need of dialysis in postoperative period, wound infection, limb survival, amputations, and mortality. Results: Aortic clamp was placed suprarenal (38.46%), infrarenal (53.84%), and interrenal (7.69%) of patients. Cold renal perfusion solution was used in 15.38% of patients with an ischemia time of 38.5 min. The average duration of warm renal ischemia was 5 min 24 s. Revascularization of superior mesenteric artery (SMA) was done in 15.38%, and inferior mesenteric artery in 38.46%. Renal revascularization by Madiba–Robbs technique was done in 30.76% of patients. In 92.3% of patients, bifurcated Dacron synthetic graft was used, and in 7.69%, femoral vein with bovine pericardial patch was used for revascularization. In postoperative period, 7.69% developed acute limb ischemia, 30.07% had severe metabolic acidosis, and 15.38% of patients had respiratory complications with good renal function and no bowel ischemia. Conclusion: Renal and mesenteric revascularization in addition to aortobifemoral bypass is a safe, effective, and durable procedure with acceptable postoperative complications. The effective surgical technique of renal and mesenteric revascularization including the usage of renal perfusion solution was found to be of paramount importance in our study. All patients who underwent SMA revascularization were free from abdominal angina. All patients who underwent renal revascularization were free from dialysis and also there was a decrease in the use of antihypertensive drugs in these patients.