Aortic Valve Prosthesis Research Articles

Less Is More? Combined Approaches to Improve Mortality and Morbidity after Aortic Valve Replacement.

Nowadays, one of the main goals of aortic valve surgery is to reduce the biological impact, mortality, and complications. It is well-known that long operative times in terms of the extracorporeal circulation, but above all, of the aortic cross-clamp time (ACC), represent a risk factor for mortality in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. In order to shorten the aortic cross-clamp time, many technological improvements, such as sutureless prostheses, have been introduced, but their actual effectiveness has not been proven yet. The aim of this study was to assess the 30-day outcomes of patients undergoing aortic valve replacement surgery, focusing on the ACC length. All 3139 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement between January 2013 and July 2022 at our institution were enrolled. The data were retrospectively collected and the baseline characteristics and intraoperative variables were recorded. In order to adjust the results according to the differences in the baseline characteristics, propensity score matching was performed and four groups of 351 patients were obtained based on the first, second, third, and fourth quartile of the ACC time. The patient population included 132 redo surgeries (9.4%) and 61 cases of active endocarditis (4.3%), with an overall median EuroSCORE II of 1.8 (IQR 1.2-3.1). An increase across the groups was observed in terms of the acute kidney failure (p < 0.001) incidence, the number of blood transfusions (p = 0.022), prolonged hospital stays (p < 0.001), the and respiratory failure (p < 0.001) incidence. A p of < 0.1 was found for the 30-day mortality (p = 0.079). The predictors of an early 30-day mortality were standard full sternotomy (OR 2.48, 95% CI 1.14-5.40, p = 0.022), EuroSCORE II (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.05-1.16, p < 0.001), and a trend for a longer ACC time (Q4 vs. Q1: OR 2.62, 95% CI 0.89-7.68, p = 0.080). Shortening the operative times resulted in marked improvements of the patients' outcomes. The combined use of minimally invasive approaches and sutureless aortic valve prostheses allows for a lower 30-day events rate. New technologies should be assessed to obtain the best results with the least risk.

Heart Transplantation and Thromboembolic Risk In Patients With Percutaneous Aortic Valve Prosthesis and Left Ventricular Assist Device: A Case Report

Transcatheter aortic valve replacements have become a good option for patients with aortic valve disease and high surgical risk. Thromboembolism is reported as a relatively common complication of Transcatheter aortic valve replacement. This risk may be increased in patients who have left ventricular assist devices, as valve motion is drastically reduced. We present the case of a 65-year-old man with a history of alcoholism and valvular cardiomyopathy (severe chronic aortic insufficiency) with severe left ventricular dysfunction. Improvement in ventricular function followed the cessation of alcohol consumption, but still in poor clinical condition. Due to his high surgical risk, it was decided to implant a percutaneous aortic valve to treat the valve deficiency. Two months later, he suffered from a first episode of embolic stroke, which he successfully recovered. Despite the treatment, his clinical status did not improve (INTERMACS 3-4), and he was referred for heart transplantation. A left ventricular assist device was implanted as a bridge to the transplant. While on the waiting list, he suffered from other 3 episodes of stroke, 2 of them requiring mechanical thrombectomy. Finally, his transplant was performed with a favorable postoperative clinical course. Heart transplantation may be feasible in patients with multiple intracardiac devices in left chambers, although we must be aware of the increased thromboembolic risk, especially when used in combination.

Structural study of a polymeric aortic valve prosthesis. Analysis for a hyperelastic material

This work presents a structural computational simulation of a polymeric aortic valve prosthesis, made with a hyperelastic material (Styrene-Ethylene/Propylene-Styrene). The valve has a suture ring, three pillars placed at 120° and three leaflets. The analysis is based on a modification over previous designs consisting in a fillet concave surface to avoid stress concentration at the junctions between leaflets and pillars. Three shapes were simulated. The first one was used to validate the computational method by comparison of the results with a recent paper. The second shape was designed to show that a fillet or “rounding” can be beneficial to the stress leaflet reduction. The third shape was also designed to show that the reduction of leaflet thickness and intercommissural distance between leaflets at the pillar junctions improves the valve opening and closure. The use of fillet with a 0.5 mm radius, reduced 26.5% the maximum Von Mises stresses for the second shape and 33.9% for the third shape. Additionally, for the latter, the opening area was not affected for the high stiffness due to fillet. The results -mainly for the third shape-are promising and give rise to future studies: further shape optimization, analysis for other materials and valve simulation under pathological loads.

PB1546 Time is Everything: Case Report of an Acute Thrombosis of Mechanical Aortic Valve Prosthesis in a Pregnant Woman

PB1546 Time is Everything: Case Report of an Acute Thrombosis of Mechanical Aortic Valve Prosthesis in a Pregnant Woman

Revisiting aortic valve prosthesis choice in patients younger than 50 years: 10 years results of the AUTHEARTVISIT study.

This population-based cohort study investigated mid-term outcome after surgical aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthetic or mechanical valve prosthesis in patients aged <50 years in a European social welfare state. We analysed patient data from the main social insurance carriers in Austria (2010-2020). Subsequent patient-level record linkage with national health data provided patient characteristics and clinical outcome. Survival, reoperation, myocardial infarction, heart failure, embolic stroke or intracerebral haemorrhage, bleeding other than intracerebral haemorrhage and major adverse cardiac events were evaluated as outcomes. A total of 991 patients were analysed. Regarding demographics, no major differences between groups were observed. Multivariable Cox regression revealed no significant difference in overall survival (P = 0.352) with a median follow-up time of 6.2 years. Reoperation-free survival was decreased (hazard ratio = 1.560 [95% CI: 1.076-2.262], P = 0.019) and the risk for reoperation was increased (hazard ratio = 2.770 [95% CI: 1.402-5.472], P = 0.003) in patients who received bioprostheses. Estimated probability of death after reoperation was 0.23 (CL: 0.08-0.35) after 2 years and 0.34 (CL: 0.06-0.53) after 10 years over both groups. Regarding further outcomes, no significant differences between the two groups were observed. In patients below 50 years of age receiving aortic valve replacement, implantation of bioprostheses when compared to mechanical heart valve prostheses was associated with a significantly higher rate of reoperations and reduced reoperation-free survival. Nevertheless, we could not observe a difference in overall survival. However, long-term follow-up has to evaluate that a significantly lower rate of reoperations may translate in consistently improved long-term survival.

Aortic sinus aneurysm invading ventricular septum and dissection caused by Behcet’s disease: a case report and literature review

Few case reports have mentioned the aortic sinus aneurysm invading ventricular septum and dissection caused by Behcet’s disease. Here, we reported a 36-year-old male patient with an aortic sinus aneurysm invading the ventricular septum and dissection caused by Behcet’s disease, who manifested as recurrent chest tightness and shortness of breath. Cardiac ultrasound showed the rupture of the right aortic sinus and the formation of ventricular septal dissection. Ascending aortic valve prosthesis replacement, mitral valvuloplasty with ring implantation and tricuspid valvuloplasty were performed. Postoperatively, he was treated with hormones, hydroxychloroquine sulfate, mycophenolate mofetil tablets, thalidomide and warfarin, and his symptoms were relieved. This is a rare case easily being misdiagnosed and missed, early diagnosis and in-time treatment are crucial to avoid surgical complications. The diagnostic and therapeutic approaches of this patient were reported and related literature was reviewed in this case report.

Intermediate-term Outcomes Following a Case Series of Reoperations for Medtronic Freestyle Stentless Aortic Valves

BackgroundData are limited on long-term outcomes in patients who have undergone a reoperation following failure of a stentless aortic valve. MethodsBetween 2006 and 2016, a retrospective analysis was performed on 24 patients who underwent open aortic valve replacement surgery for a failed stentless aortic valve prosthesis at Health Sciences North, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada. The primary outcome was a low mortality rate from cardiac-related deaths after 5 years. ResultsAll patients underwent insertion of a Medtronic Freestyle bioprosthesis (Minneapolis, MN) implanted using the modified subcoronary technique for their initial operation. The interval from the first operation to the stentless redo surgery ranged from 6 to 13 years. Aortic valve reoperation was performed for structural valve deterioration in 96% (n = 23) of the cases. Reoperations involved a removal of the stented valve leaflets and standard aortic valve replacement within the stentless casing in 20% (n = 5) of the cases, with the remaining cases requiring complete removal of the stentless prosthesis and aortic valve replacement. In those in whom a complete removal of the stentless valve was possible (n = 19), no disruption of the native aortic root occurred, with a 0% rate of conversion to a Bentall procedure. No intraoperative mortality occurred. The 30-day and 10-year operative mortality rates were 4% and 16%, respectively. ConclusionsRedo surgery for failing stentless valves can be done with relatively low risk and with acceptable long-term outcomes without resorting to root-replacement techniques.

Sacrificial scaffold-assisted direct ink writing of engineered aortic valve prostheses

Heart valve disease has become a serious global health problem, which calls for numerous implantable prosthetic valves to fulfill the broader needs of patients. Although current three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting approaches can be used to manufacture customized valve prostheses, they still have some complications, such as limited biocompatibility, constrained structural complexity, and difficulty to make heterogeneous constructs, to name a few. To overcome these challenges, a sacrificial scaffold-assisted direct ink writing approach has been explored and proposed in this work, in which a sacrificial scaffold is printed to temporarily support sinus wall and overhanging leaflets of an aortic valve prosthesis that can be removed easily and mildly without causing any potential damages to the valve prosthesis. The bioinks, composed of alginate, gelatin, and nanoclay, used to print heterogenous valve prostheses have been designed in terms of rheological/mechanical properties and filament formability. The sacrificial ink made from Pluronic F127 has been developed by evaluating rheological behavior and gel temperature. After investigating the effects of operating conditions, complex 3D structures and homogenous/heterogenous aortic valve prostheses have been successfully printed. Lastly, numerical simulation and cycling experiments have been performed to validate the function of the printed valve prostheses as one-way valves.

Optimizing aortic valve prosthesis selection in patients with obesity: Institutional experience with multidisciplinary perspective.

Aortic valve diseases are life-threatening conditions with increasing prevalence worldwide. Risk factors include gender, age, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and type 2 diabetes. Obesity is closely related to these risk factors and has been linked to a higher risk of developing aortic valve diseases. However, there is no specific guideline for managing aortic valve disease in patients with obesity, and the choice of valve type remains uncertain. A total of 130 patients with obesity who met the inclusion criteria underwent surgical aortic valve replacement. The patients were divided into two groups based on the type of prosthesis used. Among the study cohort, 50 patients received a bioprosthetic valve, while 80 patients received a mechanical valve. We compared these groups in terms of perioperative characteristics and follow-up results. Statistical significance was determined using a p-value threshold of 0.05. There were no significant differences in age, gender, body mass index, or cardiac comorbidities between the two groups. Preoperative blood results and echo findings also showed no significant differences. Intraoperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes, including mortality and acute kidney injury, did not differ significantly between the groups. In addition, BHVG patients had shorter ICU stays compared to MHVG patients without significance. Deliberate consideration is crucial when selecting valves for obese patients, particularly those with class II obesity. This is due to the potential influence of obesity on valve types, as well as the need to account for the possibility of bariatric surgery and its potential effects.

Infective Endocarditis After Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.

Scarce data are available comparing infective endocarditis (IE) following surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). This study aimed to compare the clinical presentation, microbiological profile, management, and outcomes of IE after SAVR versus TAVR. Data were collected from the "Infectious Endocarditis after TAVR International" (enrollment from 2005 to 2020) and the "International Collaboration on Endocarditis" (enrollment from 2000 to 2012) registries. Only patients with an IE affecting the aortic valve prosthesis were included. A 1:1 paired matching approach was used to compare patients with TAVR and SAVR. A total of 1688 patients were included. Of them, 602 (35.7%) had a surgical bioprosthesis (SB), 666 (39.5%) a mechanical prosthesis, 70 (4.2%) a homograft, and 350 (20.7%) a transcatheter heart valve. In the SAVR versus TAVR matched population, the rate of new moderate or severe aortic regurgitation was higher in the SB group (43.4% vs 13.5%; P < .001), and fewer vegetations were diagnosed in the SB group (62.5% vs 82%; P < .001). Patients with an SB had a higher rate of perivalvular extension (47.9% vs 27%; P < .001) and Staphylococcus aureus was less common in this group (13.4% vs 22%; P = .033). Despite a higher rate of surgery in patients with SB (44.4% vs 27.3%; P < .001), 1-year mortality was similar (SB: 46.5%; TAVR: 44.8%; log-rank P = .697). Clinical presentation, type of causative microorganism, and treatment differed between patients with an IE located on SB compared with TAVR. Despite these differences, both groups exhibited high and similar mortality at 1-year follow-up.

Predictors of New and Persistent New Left Bundle Branch Block One Year after the Implantation of a Sutureless and Rapid-Deployment Aortic Valve Prosthesis.

Conduction disorders following aortic valve replacement therapy (AVR), either surgical or percutaneous, are related to a higher risk of complete atrioventricular block and permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI). The objective of this study was to assess risk factors regarding the incidence of new postoperative and persistent new left bundle branch block (LBBB) 1 year after the implantation of a sutureless/rapid-deployment (SURD) aortic valve prosthesis. The current study included 200 consecutive patients treated with isolated or concomitant AVR between May 2014 and May 2017 at the Department of Cardiac Surgery in Pasawa with SURD aortic valve EDWARDS INTUITY EliteTM implantation. The patients were divided according to the presence of new postoperative LBBB (67 patients, 33.5%) and persistent new LBBB 1 year after AVR (35 patients, 17.5%). A comparative analysis was performed between patients with and without new LBBB after AVR and those with and without persistent LBBB 1 year after AVR. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were conducted to extract the risk factors of LBBB occurrence. Among the risk factors for the lack of new LBBB development after AVR, Euroscore II (p < 0.001) was found, while for the occurrence of persistent new LBBB 1 year after AVR, atrial fibrillation (p = 0.001), length of hospital stay (p = 0.001) and body mass index (p = 0.004) were noted. Patients with new or persistent new LBBB 1 year after AVR had lower mean Euroscore II and BMI values. Their stay at the hospital was also shorter.

Early outcomes of the "Chimney" commando procedure in the small aortic and mitral annuli.

Commando procedure, the surgical replacement of the mitral and aortic valves combined with reconstruction of the fibrosa fibrous body, is a technical challenge in patients with small aortic and mitral annuli. In this study, we evaluated the safety and early outcomes of the "Chimney" modality of the Commando procedure, in patients with small aortic and mitral annuli, after prior valve surgery, using a self-assembled valved conduit. From April 2021 to April 2022, 30 consecutive cases of the "Chimney" Commando procedure, with a self-assembled valved conduit and other combined cardiac procedures, were fully performed for re-operative patients with small aortic roots. Data were obtained through a medical record review, at the Asian Heart Hospital in Wuhan, China. The patient's mean age was 52.7 ± 13.53 years, with 93.3% females. All patients had a previous heart valve surgery, 90% of which had double valve replacement (DVR). Hospital death occurred in 3.3% (n = 1) of the patients, due to malignant arrhythmias and multiorgan failure. Postoperative echocardiogram exams showed that the sizes of the aortic and mitral valve prostheses were 24.23 ± 1.60 mm and 28.33 ± 1.21 mm, respectively. All patients had intact intervalvular fibrosa (IVF) repair and no patient had any aberration in the left heart chamber communication. With the exception of one postoperative sick sinus syndrome and one re-sternotomy for bleeding, there were no significant postoperative complications, such as mortality, renal failure requiring ongoing dialysis, or mediastinitis. Echocardiography exams in the sixth postoperative month showed that the mean gradients of the aortic and mitral valves were 16.26 ± 6.44 mmHg and 11.24 ± 4.90 mmHg, respectively. In comparison with the standard Commando operation, the early outcomes and safety of the "Chimney" Commando procedure proved to be a feasible therapeutic option for patients with small aortic and mitral annuli, after prior valve operations. This approach enables the enlargement of the aortic and mitral annuli and the implantation of the necessary valve prosthesis.

Conventional vs. Sutureless Aortic Valve Bioprosthesis: Is Faster Better?

Purpose: The benefits of sutureless compared to conventional aortic valve prosthesis replacement remain controversial. Supposed advantages of sutureless aortic valve replacement include shortened cross-clamp and implantation time, as well as improved overall safety and good post-operative performance. We aimed to compare the early outcomes and performance of sutureless aortic valve replacement (su-AVR) with the sutureless Perceval (Corcym, Milan, Italy) vs. the conventional AVR with a conventional counterpart, in this case, the Labcor Dokimos Plus (LDP) aortic bioprosthesis. Methods: We compared two types of aortic valve prostheses, the sutureless (Corcym, Milan, Italy) and the conventional valve Labcor Dokimos Plus (LDP), implanted between August 2014 and May 2019 in our Department of Cardiac Surgery at RWTH Aachen University Hospital. Data were collected from 141 patients who received the Perceval (Corcym, Milan, Italy) and 138 who received the Labcor Dokimos Plus (LDP) aortic bioprosthesis. After matching the two groups considering STS mortality risk and pre-operative LDH levels, 201 patients were included in our final study cohort. Seventy-one patients (17 from the Perceval group and 54 from the Dokimos group) were excluded due to the lack of complete data, particularly standardized echocardiographic data (n = 71). Primary endpoints were 30-day mortality, length of hospital stay, and pacemaker implantation. Secondary endpoints were echocardiographic parameters, major adverse cardiovascular events, and prosthesis failure (grade II aortic regurgitation, paravalvular leak with reintervention). Results: Bypass and cross-clamp time proved to be shorter in the Perceval group, while hospital stays were longer. The faster implantation had no effect on the 30-day mortality primary endpoint. Transvalvular gradients were significantly higher in the Perceval group, in addition to a smaller effective orifice area. The LDH values were remarkably higher post-operatively in the Perceval group. Conclusions: Regarding the clinical outcomes, Perceval was equivalent and not superior to the Dokimus bioprosthesis. The suitability of a Perceval prosthesis implantation must be determined on a case-by-case basis and reserved for elderly patients with increased comorbidity.

Single-Center, Multisurgeon Experience with a Sutureless Rapid Deployment Aortic Valve Prosthesis: A Clinical Analysis in the United States

Background. The Perceval S is a sutureless, bovine pericardial aortic prosthesis on a nitinol stent, which has limited data on outcomes, as well as cost, from the United States. Methods. We performed a retrospective review of Perceval S implantation at a single center between 2015 and 2018. After exclusion criteria, we compared 234 patients who underwent sutureless aortic valve (SLV) implantation with 370 patients who underwent standard sutured aortic valves (SAVR). Hospital cost data were reviewed, and risk adjustment, done by propensity score and inverse probability weighting, was used to compare outcomes. Results. Compared to those undergoing SAVR, the SLV group was older and had a higher proportion of multicomponent operations, higher preoperative white blood cell count, higher rate of previous percutaneous coronary interventions, more comorbid conditions (diabetes, renal insufficiency, and dialysis), and more three-vessel coronary disease. For isolated AVR, partial upper hemisternotomy was more frequent in SLV. The mean cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp times for isolated SLV were significantly lower than SAVR. After adjustment, the cohort was balanced. Operative differences for SLV were lower cross-clamp and pump time, larger valve size, more minimally invasive approaches, and shorter operating room times. There were no differences in other postoperative complications (postoperative atrial fibrillation, stroke, renal failure, prolonged ventilation, and in-hospital mortality; p &gt; 0.05 for all). Mean and median hospital costs were higher in the SLV group, largely due to the cost of the implant. Conclusion. Sutureless tissue aortic valves can be used safely with lower cardiopulmonary bypass and clamp times than sutured prostheses and facilitate use of minimally invasive approaches. This valve may be advantageous in older, higher risk patients requiring more complex operations.

10-year results of simultaneous combined procedures of coronary artery stenting and transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a clinical case

Introduction. In recent years, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become routine clinical practice in treatment of severe aortic stenosis in patients with high surgical risk. Timing of endovascular procedures is a key issue in management of patients with severe aortic valve stenosis and concomitant coronary heart disease. To date, there is no consensus on the advisability and necessity of performing simultaneous procedures of TAVI and coronary artery stenting. The long-term (over 10 years) outcomes of combined percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with severe aortic stenosis and coronary heart disease are not fully studied. Results and Methods. We described a long-term outcome in a 75-year-old female patient with marked aortic stenosis (maximum gradient = 103 mm Hg, mean gradient = 62 mm Hg, AVA area = 0.37 cm2), NYHA class II and hemodynamically significant coronary lesions. Given the high surgical risk (logistic EuroScore = 27.72%, STS = 17.21%), the patient underwent the following simultaneous procedures upon vital indications: coronary artery stenting and transcatheter aortic valve implantation with 23-mm Edwards Sapien XT prosthesis. There were no major intra- and perioperative complications. At the control examination 7 months later, the patient had no complaints. She reported an improvement in general well-being and increased tolerance of physical activities. The transprosthetic aortic blood flow parameters were as follows: peak gradient = 13 mm Hg; mean gradient = 7 mm Hg; V max = 1.8 m/s; there were 2 paraprosthetic fistulas with Grade 1–2 regurgitation. A control angiogram showed no restenosis in the coronary artery stents. 10 years after simultaneous interventions, hemodynamic parameters of the functioning aortic valve prosthesis were within the normal ranges. Control coronary angiography revealed satisfactory outcomes of coronary artery stenting. Conclusions. Simultaneous procedure of transcatheter aortic valve implantation combined with coronary artery stenting is feasible, effective, and safe. This technique can be used to treat patients with extremely high risk for open heart surgery. Keywords: aortic stenosis, transcatheter aortic valve implantation, coronary heart disease, coronary arteries, single-stage endovascular procedures

Loculated pericardial hematoma compressing the right atrium post mechanical aortic valve replacement and the role of point-of-care echocardiography: a case report

BackgroundBleeding in the postoperative period after cardiac surgery is relatively frequent, especially in patients with early anticoagulant therapy, as in the case of mechanical valve replacement. Diffuse hemopericardium is relatively easy to diagnose; however, loculated pericardial hematomas leading to hemodynamic collapse are relatively rare and their diagnosis is more challenging.Case presentationThis report is of a 75-year-old Asian woman who presented dyspnea, confusion and hemodynamic collapse related to loculated pericardial hematoma compressing the right atrium 3 days after mechanical aortic valve replacement. Urgent transthoracic echocardiogram performed as point-of-care approach showed right atrial compression, the aortic valve prosthesis had normal function. Surgical removal of the hematoma resulted in complete recovery.ConclusionLoculated pericardial hematoma might lead to hemodynamic collapse. Close monitoring of hemodynamic parameters is essential, also point-of-care echocardiography is essential for early recognition and prompt management in patients with critical hemodynamic condition.

Single-Center Real-World Experience with Sutureless Aortic Valve Prosthesis in Isolated and Combined Procedures.

Due to their favourable hemodynamic performance and the ability to enable minimally invasive access procedures, sutureless aortic valve prostheses have found their place in the armamentarium of cardiothoracic surgeons. In this study, we sought to review our institutional experience of sutureless aortic valve replacement (SU-AVR). We carried out a retrospective analysis of 200 consecutive patients who underwent an SU-AVR with a Perceval valve between December 2019 and February 2023. The mean age of patients was 69.3 ± 8.1 years, and patients showed a moderate-risk profile with a mean logistic EuroSCORE-II of 5.2 ± 8.1%. An isolated SU-AVR was performed in 85 (42.5%) patients, concomitant CABG was performed in 75 (37.5%) and 40 patients (20%) underwent a multivalve procedure involving SU-AVR. The cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and cross-clamp (CC) times were 82.1 ± 35.1 and 55.5 ± 27.8 min, respectively. In-hospital, 30-day, 6-month and 1-year mortality rates were 4.5%, 6.5%, 7.5% and 8.2%, respectively. The postoperative transvalvular mean pressure gradient was 6.3 ± 1.6 mmHg and stayed stable over the follow-up time. We reported no cases of paravalvular leakage, and the incidence of stroke was 0.5%. With their favourable hemodynamic performance and shorter CC and CPB times, sutureless aortic valve prostheses facilitate minimally invasive access surgery, being a safe and durable promising approach for the surgical AVR.

Sutureless Aortic Valve Prosthesis in Redo Procedures: Single-Center Experience.

Background and Objectives: Sutureless aortic valve prostheses have presented favorable hemodynamic performance while facilitating minimally invasive access approaches. As the population ages, the number of patients at risk for aortic valve reoperation constantly increases. The aim of the present study is to present our single-center experience in sutureless aortic valve replacement (SU-AVR) in reoperations. Materials and Methods: The data of 18 consecutive patients who underwent SU-AVR in a reoperation between May 2020 and January 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Results: The mean age of the patients was 67.9 ± 11.1 years; patients showed a moderate-risk profile with a median logistic EuroSCORE II of 7.8 (IQR of 3.8-32.0) %. The implantation of the Perceval S prosthesis was technically successful in all patients. The mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 103.3 ± 50.0 min, and the cross-clamp time was 69.1 ± 38.8 min. No patients required a permanent pacemaker implantation. The postoperative gradient was 7.3 ± 2.4 mmHg, and no cases of paravalvular leakage were observed. There was one case of intraprocedural death, while the thirty-day mortality was 11%. Conclusions: Sutureless bioprosthetic valves tend to simplify the surgical procedure of a redo AVR. By maximizing the effective orifice area, sutureless valves may present an important advantage, being a safe and effective alternative not only to traditional surgical prostheses but also to transcatheter valve-in-valve approaches in select cases.

Acute Myocardial Infarction Due to Coronary Embolism in a Young Woman with Mechanical Aortic Valve Prosthesis and Anomalous Origin of Two Coronary Vessels: A Case Report

Acute Myocardial Infarction Due to Coronary Embolism in a Young Woman with Mechanical Aortic Valve Prosthesis and Anomalous Origin of Two Coronary Vessels: A Case Report

A Rare 10-Year Outcome Inverted Replacement of the Mitral Valve with a Mechanical Aortic Valve Prosthesis in an Achondroplastic Dwarfism

A Rare 10-Year Outcome Inverted Replacement of the Mitral Valve with a Mechanical Aortic Valve Prosthesis in an Achondroplastic Dwarfism