HighlightsThe main surgical interventions for aortic valve pathology at the aortic root site are aortic valve replacement and redo replacement. The Ozaki procedure emerged in the last decade; it involves replacement of the aortic valve using autologous pericardium. Despite the fact that many centers perform the Ozaki procedure frequently, there are few studies on the comparative evaluation of its efficacy. This necessitated the present study, which compares three groups of patients operated on using different techniques. Aim. To compare the short- and medium-term results of the Ozaki procedure and aortic valve replacements using mechanical and biological valves.Methods. The retrospective study included 189 patients operated on for aortic malformation at the Cardiac Surgery Department of Sechenov University from 2017 to 2022. Three groups of patients were formed: patients undergoing Ozaki procedure were included in the Ozaki group (70 patients), patients undergoing aortic valve replacement using mechanical prosthesis were included in the Mechanical valve group (62 patients), and patients undergoing aortic valve replacement using biological prosthesis were included in the Biovalve group (57 patients). The Ozaki procedure was performed in case the diameter of the aortic annulus was ≤ 25 mm. All mid-term outcomes were assessed after at least 6 months (mean follow up period was 20 months). The primary end points were mean and peak aortic valve gradient, 30-day mortality in the short-term postoperative period, and midterm mortality (≥ 6 months).Results. The mean gradient in the Ozaki, Biovalve, and Mechanical valve groups were 10.67 ± 7.15, 15.94 ± 21, and 17.87 ± 7.52 mm Hg. The peak gradient in the Ozaki group decreased from 81.7 ± 32.5 to 21.01 ± 13.22 mm Hg (in the in-hospital setting). 6 months after surgery, the peak gradient values were 18.98 ± 16.17 mm Hg. The in-hospital mortality rates in the Ozaki, Mechanical valve and Biovalve groups were 2.86, 5.26, and 6.45%, respectively. The overall mid-term mortality in three groups was 6/189, 3.17% (95% CI: 1.5–6.07), p = 0.172.Conclusion. In the short- and mid-term period, Ozaki procedure is superior to aortic valve replacement techniques in terms of aortic valve pressure gradient and comparable in terms of mortality.
Read full abstract