Aortic Root Replacement Research Articles

Risk of Pacemaker Implantation After Aortic Root Replacement With and Without Valve Preservation

BackgroundWe compared the outcomes of aortic root replacement by composite valve grafts (CVG) and valve-sparing root replacement (VSRR) operations, with an emphasis on postoperative conduction block and the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPM). MethodsFrom 1997 to 2023, 1712 consecutive patients underwent ARR by VSRR (501 [29%]) or CVG (1211 [71%]) at a high-volume aortic center. ResultsPatients undergoing CVG were older (59 ± 14 vs 49 ± 14 years, P < .001), with more cardiovascular comorbidities. Compared with CVG, there were more women undergoing VSRR (17% vs. 13%, P = .042) and more patients with connective tissue disease (22% vs 7.3%, P < .001). Multivariable analysis found that the risk for PPM was higher after CVG compared with VSRR (6.5% vs 1.2%; odds ratio [OR], 2.83; 95% CI, 1.23-7.69; P = .024). Other variables associated with PPM include older age (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.05; P = .006) preoperative renal impairment (OR, 2.69; 95% CI, 1.24-5.6; P = .010), previous operation (OR, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.29-5.62; P = .007), and bicuspid aortic valve (OR, 3.63; 95% CI, 2.13-6.33; P < .001). Among the CVG population, patients who are at increased risk are especially those with some degree of aortic stenosis (OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.18-3.61; P = .011). Patients who required PPM had no additive risk for long-term mortality (hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.47-2.17; P = .986); however, they were more likely to have reduced ejection fraction (29.3% vs 16%, P = .014). ConclusionsThe incidence of PPM after ARR is low, but rates were higher after CVG compared with VSRR.

Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement in Children and Adolescents: Experience and Outcomes in a Public Institution in Argentina

Background: Valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSARR) with reimplantation technique is indicated in patients with aortic root aneurysm. We evaluated the mid-term outcomes of this surgical technique in children and adolescents in our institution. Methods: Retrospective study. Twenty-one patients who underwent VSARR surgery were included between July 2006 and July 2022. The relationship between baseline variables and progression of aortic regurgitation (AR) was assessed. Results: The median age was 13 years. Seventeen patients had connective tissue disorders (3 with bicuspid aortic valve), 2 operated congenital heart disease, 1 isolated bicuspid aortic valve and 1 Turner syndrome. Thirteen patients had mild AR and 5 had moderate AR preoperatively. Three patients underwent early aortic replacement, 2 due to endocarditis and 1 due to severe acute AR. The median follow-up was 4.1 years. Of 17 patients at follow-up, 2 developed mild-moderate AR, 2 moderate AR and 3 severe AR. One of them underwent Bentall surgery. No association was found between the degree of preoperative AR or the presence of bicuspid aortic valve and the progression of postoperative AR. There was no association between the type of postoperative valve coaptation and the development of AR greater than mild at follow-up. Conclusions: VSARR with reimplantation is a feasible surgical technique with favorable mid-term outcomes and low reoperation rate in pediatric patients.

Redo Hemi-Cabrol Aortic Root Replacement with Hemi aortic arch repair

Redo Hemi-Cabrol Aortic Root Replacement with Hemi aortic arch repair

CARDIOVASCULAR INVOLVEMENT IN SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS

Abstract Background Cardiovascular involvement is frequent in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Aortic insufficiency is a common valvular abnormality seen in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), it may be caused by a primary valve pathology or by an aortitis One of the cardiac manifestations associated with SLE and antiphospholipid syndrome (APLS) is Libman–Sacks endocarditis, also known as non–bacterial thrombotic endocarditis Although rare, there are reported cases of lupus aortitis which has also been associated with dissection, aneurysm and thrombus. Case Report We present a case of a 40 –years–old lady with lupus glomerulonephritis requiring immunosuppression and dialysis, who presented to the emergency department with fever and dyspnea. She was first treated with dialysis. Blood cultures drawn from central venous catheter peripheral were positive for staphylococcus epidermidis, the cultures from peripheral blood was negative instead.Transthoracic and transesophageal Echocardiography showed severe aortic regurgitation (not present three month earlier) with doubt valvular vegetations and with a focal enlargement of the aortic root (figure 1, 2).The patient met one major criterion (blood culture) and two minor criteria (high risk and fever), implying possible infective endocarditis. The patient was then started on intravenous antibiotics (vancomycin) and immunosuppression was reduced. Given the hemodynamic instability due to the severe aortic insufficiency, an Heart CT scan was performed to planned the surgical intervention. The CT scan confirmed the presence of small, multiple vegetation attached to the aortic leaflet and an aortic dissection on the right coronary cusp (figure 3). She proceeded to urgent surgery with aortic valve and aortic root replacement, the histology revealed evidence of Libman–Sacks endocarditis and aortitis. Discussion Our patient showed two different cardiovascular complications of SLE: the more frequent Libman –Sack endocarditis and the rare lupus aortitis associated to aortic dissection.The patient had risk factors for infective endocarditis and she did fulfil the modified Duke’s criteria for infective endocarditis and was treated with antibiotics and with a reduction of immunosuppression therapy. In fact, it can be difficult to distinguish between infective endocarditis and Libman–Sacks endocarditis especially in the setting of risk factors for both. Antibiotics and immunosuppressants should be used both.

QUALITY OF LIFE OF PATIENTS TREATED BY VALVE-SPARING AORTIC ROOT REPLACEMENT

The aim. To determine the effectiveness of David valve-preserving operation in comparison with Bentall operation based on the analysis of patients' quality of life after operations. Materials and methods. The study included 107 patients who underwent planned and urgent surgical treatment at the Heart Institute of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine from 2015 to 2023. The patients were divided into two groups depending on the type of surgical intervention: group A consisted of 53 patients (49,11±1,54 years; 47 (88,68%) males), who underwent the David procedure (valve-sparing replacement of aortic root and ascending aorta), group B – 55 patients (52,36±1,56 years; 53 (96,36%) males), who underwent Bentall surgery (replacement of the valve, root and ascending part of the aorta). The quality of life was assessed before the operation for each group, and in the long-term period after operation. The quality of life of the patients of both groups was compared. It was assessed using the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (MOS SF-36) questionnaire. Results. The obtained data indicated that the average preoperative values of quality of life indicators of patients of both groups with different types of aneurysm correction were significantly different from ideal health. The performed operations significantly improved the assessment of the quality of life. When comparing the quality of life in the remote period of the patients of both groups, the indicators were significantly better in group A. We noticed that the patients of group A had a significantly better psycho-social component, which probably influenced the assessment of other scales. Group A patients had statistically better all indicators of quality of life after surgery comparing with group B patients. Group B patients complained about the sound of the artificial aortic valve prosthesis, sometimes the occurrence of minor nosebleeds and the need for frequent visits of the doctor to monitor blood "thinning" indicators. Conclusions. The obtained results indicate a positive change in the quality of life in patients of both groups. When David operation is performed for aortic root and ascending aortic aneurysms, the quality of life is significantly better than in patients after Bentall operation. We recommend performing David operations at the highly specialized cardiac centers.

Comparative Analysis of Long-Term Outcomes in Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Reimplantation: Full Sternotomy versus Mini-Sternotomy Approach.

Background: Aortic valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSARR) David procedure has not been routinely performed via minimally invasive access due to its complexity. Methods: We compared our results for mini-VSARR to sternotomy-VSARR from another excellence center. Results: Eighty-four patients, 62 in the sternotomy-VSARR group and 22 in the mini-VSARR group, were included. A baseline, the aneurysm dimensions were higher in the mini-VSARR group. Propensity matching resulted in 17 pairs with comparable characteristics. Aortic cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times were significantly longer in the mini-VSARR group, by 60 and 20 min, respectively (p < 0.001). In-hospital outcomes were comparable between the groups. Drainage volumes were numerically lower, and hospital length of stay was, on average, 3 days shorter (p < 0.001) in the mini-VSARR group. At a median follow-up of 5.5 years, there was no difference in mortality (p = 0.230). Survival at 1, 5 and 10 years was 100%, 100%, and 95% and 95%, 87% and 84% in the mini-VSARR and sternotomy-VSARR groups, respectively. No repeat interventions on the aortic valve were documented. Echocardiographic follow-up was complete in 91% with excellent durability of repair regardless of the approach: no cases of moderate/severe aortic regurgitation were reported in the mini-VSARR group. Conclusions: The favorable outcomes, reduced drainage, and shorter hospital stays associated with the mini-sternotomy approach underscore its potential advantages expanding beyond cosmetic outcome.

Reoperation after aortic root replacement and its impact on long-term survival

ObjectiveReoperation after aortic root replacement (ARR) is associated with increased operative risk and complexity. This study evaluated clinical outcomes and reoperation rates in patients undergoing ARR. MethodsFrom 2004 to 2021, 2700 adult patients underwent an ARR in a 2-institution database. Among 2542 surviving patients, 705 patients who had a history of previous cardiac surgery as well as 11 patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement after index ARR were excluded. Among the finalized cohort of 1826 patients, 88 (4.8%) underwent a reoperation (REDO) on the aortic valve or proximal aorta (root/ascending) a mean of 3.1 years after index ARR whereas 1738 (95%) did not undergo reoperation (no-REDO). A subgroup analysis was performed among those undergoing reoperation by indication including valve dysfunction (48%), endocarditis/graft infection (33%), and aortic aneurysm/dissection/rupture (12%). Reoperative indication was unknown in 6 patients (7%). ResultsThe REDO group was younger at time of index ARR (52 vs 58 years, P < .0001) and had more bicuspid aortic valves (56% vs 37%, P = .0003). Most patients underwent modified Bentall ARR (61%), whereas 38% underwent a valve-sparing root replacement. Index root operations were similar between groups. At time of reoperation, 53% underwent aortic valve replacement and 35% underwent redo root replacement. Long-term survival was similar between REDO and no-REDO groups (80% vs 85%, P = .26) and reoperation was not a risk factor for late mortality (hazard ratio, 1.31; P = .26); however, REDO ARR was a risk factor for late mortality (hazard ratio, 2.41; P = .02). ConclusionsThe incidence of aortic valve and/or proximal aorta reoperation after index ARR is relatively low at 4.8%; however, root reoperation is a risk factor for late mortality.

Early and mid-term outcomes of aortic annular enlargement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

There is mounting evidence at experienced centers that aortic annular enlargement (AAE) procedures are safe adjuncts to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) that do not increase perioperative morbidity and mortality. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the impact of AAE procedures on mid-term outcomes after SAVR. OVID MEDLINE, OVID Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched comprehensively. Comparative studies examining adult patients undergoing SAVR with and without AAE were eligible for inclusion. Studies involving aortic root replacement, Ross procedures, and Ozaki procedures were excluded. The risk of bias was assessed according to Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I), and the quality of evidence was evaluated according to Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Random effects meta-analysis facilitated the quantitative synthesis. A total of 2,765 records were retrieved. After full-text review, 15 eligible studies were identified for data extraction and synthesis. The dataset included a total of 216,654 patients (AAE: 7,967; no AAE: 208,687). Only mid-term outcomes were available. In unmatched and unadjusted studies, perioperative mortality was noted to be higher in the AAE group. However, this difference was not observed in studies with matching or adjusted outcomes. In both the unmatched and unadjusted studies, and the matched and adjusted studies, there were no statistically significant differences identified regarding perioperative stroke, myocardial infarction, or permanent pacemaker implantation. Similarly, there were no statistically significant differences identified in mid-term mortality [hazard ratio (HR), 1.03; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.95 to 1.11; P=0.49; I2=20% (matched/adjusted studies)], aortic valve reintervention [HR, 0.98; 95% CI: 0.75 to 1.27; P=0.86; I2=0% (matched/adjusted studies)], or heart failure [HR, 1.06; 95% CI: 0.86 to 1.30; P=0.58; I2=25% (matched/adjusted studies)]. SAVR with AAE does not appear to be associated with increased perioperative morbidity or mortality. There is no conclusive indication that AAE enhances mid-term survival, freedom from reoperation, or freedom from heart failure after SAVR.

Indications and outcomes of second aortic procedures after acute type A dissection repair.

Aortic arch or aortic root replacement is not performed in all cases of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAD), and a second aortic procedure will become necessary over time for some patients. Indications and outcomes, of second aortic procedures have not been studied extensively. Characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of all patients undergoing surgical repair for type A acute aortic dissection were analysed and patients needing second aortic procedure during follow-up were identified. The latter group was divided in 2 subgroups: on-pump includes patients operated on using cardiopulmonary bypass and off-pump without cardiopulmonary bypass. A total of 638 patients underwent surgery for ATAD; 8% required a second aortic procedure. The most frequent indication for the second aortic procedure was dehiscence of suture lines (44%), followed by arch dilatation (24%). In-hospital mortality was 12%. Isolated ascending aorta replacement at the first surgery was associated with higher incidence of second aortic procedure (P = 0.006). Most patients in the on-pump group underwent a proximal reoperation (75%), with a mortality rate of 14.2%. In-hospital mortality of patients in the off-pump group was 7.7%. Long-term survival analysis showed no difference between groups (P = 0,526), Off-pump patients have greater likelihood of a second intervention during follow-up (P = 0.004). Extended aortic root surgery and customized aortic arch repair in ATAD could be reasonable to reduce the incidence and mortality of high-risk second aortic procedures.

Giant unruptured sinus of Valsalva aneurysms causing angina pectoris

BackgroundSinus of Valsalva aneurysm (SVA) is a rare cardiac anomaly which can be congenital or acquired. Patients with SVA are commonly asymptomatic when the occupying effect of SVA is insignificant, while ruptured SVA usually causes severe symptoms including heart failure and myocardial ischemia.Case presentationWe present an unusual case of a 64-year-old female manifesting with exertional dyspnea as well as angina pectoris for three months. Echocardiography and cardiac computed tomographic angiography confirmed unruptured left-coronary and non-coronary SVAs. The left anterior descending artery and left circumflex artery were stretched and compressed by the SVA which causing myocardial ischemia. The patient finally received aortic root replacement (Bentall procedure) and got symptom relieved.ConclusionsGiant unruptured SVA originating from left coronary sinus is extremely rare. Our case highlights that giant SVA should be considered in cases with angina pectoris. Echocardiography and coronary computed tomographic angiography are useful and important for diagnosis. Surgery is highly recommended in patients with SVA.

Investigation of the Association between Bilateral Selective Anterograde Cerebral Perfusion and Postoperative Ischemic Stroke in Obese Patients with Emergency Surgery for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection.

Background and objectives: The relationship between cerebral perfusion and new postoperative ischemic stroke in obese patients is not well defined. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between selective bilateral anterograde cerebral perfusion and new postoperative ischemic stroke in obese patients with emergency surgery for acute type A aortic dissection. Materials and methods: A total of 292 patients with emergency surgery for acute type A aortic dissection were included in this study. Patients with hemorrhagic stroke or ischemic stroke with severe neurological dysfunction at admission that were not candidates for surgery; patients who died in the first 48 h after intensive care admission and patients with incomplete medical records were excluded. Results: The mean age was 59.42 ± 10.68 years and the mean Euroscore was 9.12 ± 1.63. Obesity was present in 76.4%, the incidence of new postoperative ischemic stroke was 27.5%, and the postoperative mortality rate was 26.7%. The mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 206.81 ± 75.48 min, the aortic cross-clamp time was 118.2 ± 46.42 min, and 90% of cases required cerebral perfusion. The mean cerebral perfusion time was 30.8 ± 24.41 min. Obese patients had a higher frequency of in-hospital death (p = 0.009), smoking (p = 0.036), hypertension (p = 0.023), left common carotid artery dissection (p < 0.001), right common carotid artery dissection (p = 0.029), femoral artery cannulation (p = 0.026), aortic root replacement (p = 0.009), aortic valve replacement (p = 0.005) and early reintervention for bleeding (p = 0.004). Using logistic regression, selective bilateral anterograde cerebral perfusion over 40 min in obese patients was independently associated with new postoperative ischemic stroke (OR = 2.35; 95%CI = 1.36-4.86; p = 0.021). Conclusions: A patient-tailored strategy for cerebral perfusion should be considered in obese patients, considering the high atheromatous burden of the supra-aortic vessels in these patients and the potential risk of atheromatous embolization associated with this technique.

Inflammation in aortic surgery: postoperative evolution of biomarkers according pathologies and segments of the aorta

ObjectivesAortic pathologies often present with elevated inflammatory biomarkers due to the nature of the disease. Open aortic surgery causes significant trauma to the body due to often mandatory ischemic periods, long cardiopulmonary bypass times and polytransfusion. We aim to determine postoperative trends on inflammation biomarkers for different aortic pathologies and type of surgery in different segments of the aorta.MethodsRetrospective review of prospectively collected data of 193 consecutive patients who underwent aortic surgery in our centre between 2017 and 2021, grouped according to the type of aortic intervention: (1) Type A aortic dissection (AD) repair with ascending aorta/hemiarch replacement, (2) Aortic root replacement (ARR), (3) Aortic arch + Frozen elephant trunk (FET), (4) Descending thoracic aorta (DTA)/Thoraco-Abdominal aortic repair (TAA). Primary outcomes were daily values of white blood cells (WBC) and C-Reactive Protein (CRP) during the first 15 postoperative days.ResultsAll groups had a similar inflammatory peak in the first 2–4 days (WBC 12-15 × 109 c/L). AD and FET groups show similar trends with WBC and CRP peaks on days 2 and 10. The ARR group didn’t experience the 2nd peak as most patients were already discharged. DTA/TAA patients experienced a more prolonged inflammatory response, reaching a plateau by day 5–10. AD group shows the highest WBC levels and the DTA/TAAA group the highest CRP levels. CRP levels remain elevated (100–200 mg/L) in all groups after 15 postoperative days.ConclusionsInflammatory biomarkers show different postoperative trends depending on the clinical presentation and complexity of the aortic procedure performed. Further understanding of the inflammatory response to different aortic pathologies and surgical procedures will permit reduction on the liberal use of antibiotics that this cohort of patients are usually exposed to. An earlier version of the data included in this manuscript was presented as Oral in the UK Society of Cardiothoracic Surgery Annual meeting in 2021

A challenging case of emergency redo surgery for acute type A aortic dissecting aneurysm of ascending and aortic arch with frozen elephant trunk following aortic root replacement

Redo ascending and aortic arch surgeries following previous cardiac or aortic surgery are associated with high risk of morbidity and mortality due to multiple factors included sternal re-entry injury, extensive aortic arch surgery, emergency aortic surgery, prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass duration, poor heart function, and patients with older age. Therefore, appropriate surgical strategies are important. We report a case of a 72-year-old gentleman with previous surgery of aortic root replacement who presented with acute Type A aortic dissecting aneurysm of ascending and aortic arch complicated with left hemothorax, which was successfully treated by emergency redo aortic surgery with frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique.

Abnormal Cardiac Magnetic Resonance-Derived Ascending Aortic Area Strain Demonstrates Altered Ventriculo-Vascular Function in Marfan Syndrome.

There remains a need for improved imaging markers for risk stratification and treatment guidance in Marfan syndrome (MFS). After aortic root replacement (ARR), vascular remodeling and progressive aneurysm formation can occur due to alterations in up- and downstream wall biomechanics and hemodynamics. We aim to compare the ventriculo-vascular properties of patients with MFS with controls, and investigate the correlation between ascending aortic area strain and descending aortic area strain (DAAS) with other clinical variables. Nineteen patients with MFS (47% males), including 6 with ARR were studied. In 26 studies, aortic area strain was measured using cross-sectional cardiac magnetic resonance images at the ascending and proximal descending aortic levels. Left atrial, left ventricular longitudinal, and left ventricle circumferential strain (left atrial longitudinal strain, left ventricular longitudinal strain, and left ventricular circumferential strain, respectively) were measured using cardiac magnetic resonance-feature tracking. Compared with healthy controls, patients with MFS had significantly impaired left ventricular longitudinal strain and left ventricular circumferential strain (-15.8 ± 4.7 vs -19.7 ± 4.8, P = 0.005, and -17.7 ± 4.0 vs -27.0 ± 4.1, P < 0.001). Left atrial longitudinal strain was comparable between patients with MFS and controls. AAAS was significantly reduced (19.0 [11.9, 23.7] vs 46.1 ± 11.3, P < 0.001), whereas DAAS was not significantly decreased. AAAS and DAAS were negatively correlated with age, whereas no significant associations were identified with left ventricle function indices. No significant differences were observed between the ventriculo-vascular properties of patients with MFS who underwent ARR and those who did not. Patients with MFS demonstrated impaired ventricular and vascular function compared with healthy controls. Further investigations are warranted to determine clinical utility of aortic stiffness indices for predicting primary and repeat aortic events.

Effect of graft sizing in valve-sparing aortic root replacement for bicuspid aortic valve: The Goldilocks ratio

ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of graft sizing on valve performance in valve-sparing aortic root replacement for bicuspid aortic valve. MethodsIn addition to a diseased control model, 3 representative groups—free-edge length to aortic/graft diameter (FELAD) ratio <1.3, 1.5 to 1.64, and >1.7—were replicated in explanted porcine aortic roots (n = 3) using straight grafts sized respective to the native free-edge length. They were run on a validated ex vivo univentricular system under physiological parameters for 20 cycles. All groups were tested within the same aortic root to minimize inter-root differences. Outcomes included transvalvular gradient, regurgitation fraction, and orifice area. Linear mixed effects model and pairwise comparisons were employed to compare outcomes across groups. ResultsThe diseased control had mean transvalvular gradient 10.9 ± 6.30 mm Hg, regurgitation fraction 32.5 ± 4.91%, and orifice area 1.52 ± 0.12 cm2. In ex vivo analysis, all repair groups had improved regurgitation compared with control (P < .001). FELAD <1.3 had the greatest amount of regurgitation among the repair groups (P < .001) and 1.5-1.64 the least (P < .001). FELAD <1.3 and >1.7 exhibited greater mean gradient compared with both control and 1.5 to 1.64 (P < .001). Among the repair groups, 1.5 to 1.64 had the largest orifice area, and >1.7 the smallest (P < .001). ConclusionsFor a symmetric bicuspid aortic valve, performance after valve-sparing aortic root replacement shows a bimodal distribution across graft size. As the FELAD ratio departs from 1.5 to 1.64 in either direction, significant increases in transvalvular gradient are observed. FELAD <1.3 may also result in suboptimal improvement of baseline regurgitation.

Effectiveness of intraoperative endoscopic evaluation in aortic valve repair with valve-sparing aortic root replacement: a comparison of short- and mid-term results.

Valve-sparing aortic root replacement requires expertise to predict repair results and prevent secondary aortic clamping for valve repair or replacement secondary to aortic valve insufficiency. Thus, intraoperative evaluation of the aortic valve using diastolic pressure at the aortic root may be helpful. The goal of this retrospective study was to compare the early and mid-term results of aortic valve repair with those of valve-sparing aortic root replacement using intraoperative endoscopic evaluation. We included 158 patients who underwent aortic valve repair with valve-sparing aortic root replacement at our hospital between December 2003 and January 2022. The patients were divided into a non-endoscopic evaluation group (group NE, n = 97; mean age 55 years) and an endoscopic evaluation group (group E, n = 61; mean age 51 years). The incidence of a second aortic clamping for aortic valve insufficiency was significantly greater in group NE (17.5%) than in group E (1.6%; P = 0.002). The presence of none or trivial aortic valve insufficiency on transthoracic echocardiography at discharge in group E (87.6%) was significantly lower than in group NE (98.4%; P = 0.017). No significant difference in the cumulative incidence of recurrence of moderate AI (P = 0.47), hospitalization for heart failure (P = 0.84) and reoperation (P = 0.25) between groups NE and E. Intraoperative endoscopic evaluation during aortic valve repair with valve-sparing aortic root replacement correlated with a lower incidence of second aortic clamping because of aortic valve insufficiency and effective aortic valve insufficiency control.

Long-term outcomes after aortic root replacement for bicuspid aortic valve-associated aneurysm.

Patients with congenital bicuspid aortic valve often require root replacement. This study aims to describe their long-term rates of mortality and reoperation. This is a multicenter retrospective study of 747 patients with bicuspid aortic valve who underwent aortic root replacement for aortic aneurysm between 2004 and 2020. Cumulative incidence curves for aortic valve and aortic reoperations were graphed. A Kaplan-Meier survival curve for the patient cohort was created alongside an age- and sex-matched curve for the US population. Multivariable Cox regression was used to determine characteristics associated with long-term mortality. The median age of our cohort was 54 [43-64] years old, and 101 (13.5%) patients were female. In patients with bicuspid aortic valve dysfunction, 274 (36.7%) had aortic insufficiency, 187 (25.0%) had aortic stenosis, and 142 (19.0%) had both. In-hospital mortality occurred in 10 (1.3%) patients. There were 56 aortic valve reoperations and 19 aortic reoperations, with a combined cumulative incidence of 35% (95% confidence interval [CI], 23%-46%) at 15years. In addition, there was comparable survival between the patient cohort and the age- and sex-matched US population. Age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.06), concomitant CABG (HR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.29-4.04), and bypass time (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.01) were associated with increased mortality. Patients who undergo aortic root replacement with bicuspid aortic valve have an increased rate of aortic reoperation (35%; 95% CI, 23%-46%) while their survival appears to be comparable to the general US population (79%; 95% CI, 73%-87%) at 15years.

Intraoperative aortic root replacement and hemiarch in an adolescent patient.

Intraoperative aortic root replacement and hemiarch in an adolescent patient.

Sub-coronary aortic root replacement post-aortic valve dehiscence: a case report

This is a case report of a 78-year-old male who underwent a sub-coronary aortic valve and root replacement due to valve dehiscence and aortic root pseudoaneurysm. The patient had complex anomalous coronary anatomy and had undergone a previous tissue aortic valve replacement in 2013. The patient made an uneventful recovery and was discharged from the hospital five days later. The authors suggest that the sub-coronary root replacement technique should be considered in elderly patients and patients with complex coronary anatomy.

Virtual Reality Computed Tomography Evaluation - Anatomy and Clinical Implications for Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement.

Three-dimensional aortic root evaluation using virtual reality (VR) techniques for valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSARR) preparation has not yet been implemented, so we demonstrated VR computed tomography (VR-CT) and assessed its utility for VSARR.Methods and Results: We enrolled 72 patients who underwent multidetector CT before elective VSARR for annuloaortic ectasia with tricuspid aortic valve. The geometries of their aortic roots were measured with a VR-CT workstation. The mean values of geometric height (GH), free margin length (FML), and commissural height (CH) were 17.2±2.4 mm, 36.0±5.2 mm, and 24.0±4.3 mm, respectively. The right coronary/noncoronary CH was significantly greater than the left coronary/right coronary and left coronary/noncoronary CH. The left coronary cusp had the shortest FML, intercommissural distances (ICD), and smallest central angle. Although the right coronary cusp had the largest values for FML, ICD, and central angle, the right coronary cusp had the lowest GH and EH. The VR-CT measurements strongly correlated with intraoperative alternatives, especially with mean GH (R2=0.75) and left coronary/noncoronary CH (R2=0.79). Furthermore, mean GH was observed to be significantly different among the selected graft size groups; therefore, the preoperative mean GH could play a significant role in graft sizing. VR-CT evaluation allows a thorough understanding of aortic root anatomy, which could facilitate VSAAR.