Aortic Stenosis Research Articles

Five-Year Outcomes with Self-expanding versus Balloon-expandable TAVI in Patients with Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction

The importance of transcatheter heart valve (THV) design on clinical outcome in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) and left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction remains unknown. We aimed to compare 5-year outcomes of patients with severe AS and reduced LV ejection fraction (LVEF), undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with balloon-expandable vs. self-expanding THVs. In a retrospective analysis from the Bern TAVI registry, patients with LVEF <50% who underwent TAVI with either balloon-expandable or self-expanding THVs were included. A 1:1 propensity-score matching was performed to account for baseline differences between groups. A total of 759 patients were included between August 2007 and December 2022, and propensity-score matching resulted in 134 pairs. Technical success was achieved in over 85% of patients, and was similar in both groups. Self-expanding THVs were associated with a lower mean transvalvular gradient (7.1 ± 3.7 mmHg vs. 9.9 ± 4.3 mmHg; P <0.001) and a higher incidence of ≥mild-to-moderate paravalvular regurgitation (36.3% vs. 11.3%; P <0.001) compared to balloon-expandable THVs. At 5 years, patients treated with a self-expanding THV had higher all-cause mortality than those with a balloon-expandable THV (67.8% vs. 55.8%, HRadjusted: 1.44; 95% CI: 1.02-2.03; P = 0.037). There were no significant differences in other clinical outcomes up to 5 years between groups. In the setting of LV systolic dysfunction, patients treated with a self-expanding THV had higher risk of 5-year mortality compared to patients treated with a balloon-expandable THV. https://www. gov. NCT01368250.

4-Octyl itaconate inhibits vascular calcification partially via modulation of HMOX-1 signaling

Vascular calcification frequently occurs in patients with chronic conditions such as chronic kidney disease (CKD), diabetes, and hypertension and represents a significant cause of cardiovascular events. Thus, identifying effective therapeutic targets to inhibit the progression of vascular calcification is essential. 4-Octyl itaconate (4-OI), a derivative of itaconate, exhibits anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activity, both of which play an essential role in the progression of vascular calcification. However, the role and molecular mechanisms of 4-OI in vascular calcification have not yet been elucidated. In this study, we investigated the effects of exogenous 4-OI on vascular calcification using vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs), arterial rings, and mice. Alizarin red staining and western blot revealed that 4-OI inhibited calcification and osteogenic differentiation of human VSMCs. Similarly, 4-OI inhibited calcification of rat arterial rings and VitD3-overloaded mouse aortas. Mechanistically, RNA sequencing analysis revealed that 4-OI treatment is most likely to affect heme oxygenase 1 (HMOX-1) mRNA expression. The study demonstrated that 4-OI treatment increased HMOX-1 mRNA and protein levels, but suppressed inflammation and oxidative stress in VSMCs under osteogenic conditions. Moreover, 4-OI treatment. HMOX-1 knockdown by siRNA or treatment with the HMOX-1 inhibitor ZnPP9 significantly reversed the suppression effect on calcification of VSMCs and aortas of VitD3-overloaded mice by 4-OI. Furthermore, HMOX-1 knockdown by siRNA markedly abrogated the inhibitory effect of 4-OI on inflammation in VSMCs. These findings suggest that 4-OI alleviates vascular calcification and inhibits oxidative stress and inflammation through modulation of HMOX-1, indicating its potential as a therapeutic target for vascular calcification.

TAVIGER : Intérêt d’une expertise coordonnée gériatrique et cardiologique dans le bilan d’éligibilité des patients âgés à un remplacement valvulaire aortique par voie percutanée

BackgroundTranscatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is the gold standard treatment for aortic stenosis in the elderly. Pre-identification of patients likely to benefit from this procedure remains crucial. A standardised geriatric assessment is used to identify the major geriatric syndromes likely to influence postoperative outcomes. ObjectiveTo identify factors associated with lack of TAVI management and to compare one-year survival in TAVI vs. non-TAVI patients. MethodsRetrospective study, between 2016 and 2020, at the Arras hospital. Patients aged 70 years and older with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis who had undergone geriatric assessment were included. ResultsOne hundred and ninety-two (192) patients, mean age 82.3 years. The 1-year mortality rate was 18% in the TAVI group and 44% in the non-TAVI group (p < 0.001).Parameters associated with no TAVI were Euroscore (ESL) 1 (19.6 ± 10.9 vs. 23.2 ± 13.5, p = 0.020), malnutrition (14% vs. 35%, p = 0.004), walking speed < 0.8 m/s (39% vs. 75%, p = 0.001), Activities of Daily Life (ADL) score (5.4 ± 1 vs. 4.2 ± 1. 6, p < 0. 001) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Life (IADL) score (2.6 ± 1.2 vs. 1.8 ± 1.4, p = 0.002), Mini Geriatric Depression Scale (mini GDS) ≥ 1 (16% vs. 38%, p = 0.045), Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score (25.1 ± 3.5 vs. 21.6 ± 4.3 < 0.001). ConclusionsGeriatric syndromes are important determinants of TAVI candidacy. Cardiological surgical risk scores are not effective in discriminating between patients. Coordinated assessment may optimise selection. Therefore, geriatric assessment should be systematically performed as part of the pre-TAVI evaluation.

TRanscatheter Aortic-Valve Implantation with or without on-site Cardiac Surgery: the TRACS trial: TAVI in centers without on-site cardiac surgery

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as an effective and safe treatment for patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. The indication to TAVI should be agreed upon by a Heart Team, and the procedure should be performed in centers with on-site cardiac surgery. However, TAVI complications requiring emergent cardiac surgery (ECS) have become very rare. Concurrently, access disparities and prolonged waiting times are pressing issues due to increasing clinical demand of TAVI. Many solutions have been proposed and one of them is the possibility of performing TAVI in centers without on-site cardiac surgery. The TRanscatheter Aortic-Valve Implantation with or without on-site Cardiac Surgery (TRACS) trial is a prospective, randomized, multicenter, open-label study with blinded adjudicated evaluation of outcomes. Patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis and deemed inoperable, at high surgical risk, or presenting with at least one clinical factor compromising the benefit/risk ratio for ECS, will be randomized to undergo TAVI either in centers with or without on-site cardiac surgery. The primary endpoint will be the composite occurrence of all-cause death, stroke, and hospital readmission for cardiovascular causes at one year. The safety endpoint will include death attributable to periprocedural complications actionable by ECS. The study aims to enroll 566 patients. The TRACS trial aims to address critical gaps in knowledge regarding the safety and efficacy of TAVI procedures performed in centers without on-site cardiac surgery, potentially improving access and outcomes for high-risk patients. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05751577.

Long-term survival after TAVI in low-flow, low-gradient aortic valve stenosis

Long-term survival after TAVI in low-flow, low-gradient aortic valve stenosis

Redo-TAVI feasibility and coronary accessibility following index TAVI with the Evolut valve in patients with bicuspid aortic valve stenosis

Redo-TAVI feasibility and coronary accessibility following index TAVI with the Evolut valve in patients with bicuspid aortic valve stenosis

Asian Pacific Society of Cardiology Position Statement on the Use of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in the Management of Aortic Stenosis

Asian Pacific Society of Cardiology Position Statement on the Use of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in the Management of Aortic Stenosis

Diagnostic Accuracy and Prognostic Value of Relative Apical Sparing in Cardiac Amyloidosis - Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Although the relative apical sparing (RAPS) pattern of left ventricular (LV) longitudinal strain is a hallmark of cardiac amyloidosis, recent studies have raised concerns about its accuracy. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) and prognostic impact of RAPS in cardiac amyloidosis. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus for manuscripts that could potentially be used in the DTA arm and prognosis arm. Thirty-seven studies were used for DTA analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio were 61% (95% confidence interval [CI] 54-68%), 83% (95% CI 80-86%), and 8.9 (95% CI 6.1-13.1), respectively. These values did not differ regardless of the presence of aortic stenosis, but the diagnostic odds ratio differed significantly among analytical software packages. For the prognosis arm, 6 studies were dichotomously assessed for RAPS, and 5 were assessed quantitatively. The pooled proportion of RAPS was 49% and the pooled estimate of the RAPS ratio was 1.40. Although RAPS was associated with outcome (hazard ratio [HR] 1.87; 95% CI 1.15-3.04; P=0.011), its significance disappeared after trim and fill analysis (HR 1.42; 95% CI 0.85-2.38; P=0.184). RAPS has a modest DTA with a significant vendor dependency and does not provide robust prognostic information.

Severe aortic stenosis and acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiac arrest

Severe aortic stenosis and acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiac arrest

Commentary: Sometimes less is more…but more seems more in treatment of neonates and infants with congenital aortic stenosis

Commentary: Sometimes less is more…but more seems more in treatment of neonates and infants with congenital aortic stenosis

Informal caregivers’ roles and needs regarding shared decision-making in severe aortic stenosis

Informal caregivers’ roles and needs regarding shared decision-making in severe aortic stenosis

Effect of Valve Type and Anesthesia Strategy for TAVR: 5-YearResultsoftheSOLVE-TAVITrial.

In the randomized SOLVE-TAVI (compariSon of secOnd-generation seLf-expandable vs. balloon-expandable Valves and gEneral vs. local anesthesia in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation) trial comparing newer-generation self-expanding valves (SEV) and balloon-expandable valves (BEV), as well as conscious sedation (CS) and general anesthesia (GA), clinical outcomes were similar both for valve and anesthesia comparison at 30days and 1 year. Prosthesis durability may affect clinical outcomes during long-term follow-up. Moreover, the impact of the anesthesia strategy on long-term clinical outcomes is unknown so far. The authors sought to compare clinical outcomes during 5-year follow-up in the randomized SOLVE-TAVI trial. In the randomized, multicenter, 2× 2 factorial, open-label SOLVE-TAVI trial, 447 intermediate- to high-risk patients with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis were randomly assigned to transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using either SEV (Evolut R, Medtronic) or BEV (SAPIEN 3, Edwards Lifesciences) and also to CS vs GA. Patients were followed-up for 5 years. During 5 years of follow-up, the combined predefined endpoint of all-cause mortality, stroke, moderate or severe paravalvular leakage, and permanent pacemaker implantation was similar in the SEV and BEV groups (67.7% vs 63.4%; HR: 0.89; 95%CI: 0.70-1.13; P=0.34). Stroke rates at 5 years were lower in the SEV group (2.2% vs 9.6%; HR: 4.84; 95%CI: 1.65-14.18; P=0.002). Regarding the anesthesia comparison, the primary endpoint of all-cause mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, and acute kidney injury occurred in 51.4% in the CS group and 61.3% in the GA group (HR: 0.80; 95%CI: 0.62-1.04; P=0.09). All-cause mortality at 5 years was lower for CS (41.5% vs 54.3%; HR: 0.70; 95%CI: 0.53-0.94; P=0.02). Transfemoral TAVR using either SEV and BEV as well as CS and GA showed similar clinical outcomes at 5 years using a combined clinical endpoint.

Coronary CT angiography instead of invasive angiography before TAVI: Feasibility and outcomes

AimsConcomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) is frequent in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) candidates. Despite societal recommendations of performing invasive coronary angiography (ICA) for coronary assessment in the pre-TAVI diagnostic workup, the prognostic value of ICA and beneficial effect of revascularization in these patients remains unclear.We aimed to determine feasibility and outcomes following a strategy of cardiac CT + coronary CT angiography (cCTA) rather than cardiac CT + ICA before TAVI. Methods and resultsWe performed a single-center, observational cohort study including all patients, without previous coronary intervention, referred to TAVI between April 2020 and November 2021. CAD was assessed by cCTA, and only patients with proximal stenosis >70 %, or left main stenosis >50 %, or cCTA was non-evaluable regarding proximal segments were subsequently referred to ICA.240 patients were included in the study. No adverse effects to pre-cCTA-scan nitroglycerin administration were observed. On cCTA, 92 % of the patients had atheroscerosis. 191 (80 %) patients had cCTA only performed, while 49 (20 %) patients underwent subsequent ICA. During a median (range) follow-up of 15 (Abdel-Wahab et al., 2012; Rapp et al., 2001; Sabbah et al., 2021; Gautier et al., 2011; Sankaramangalam et al., 2017; Otto et al., 2021; Tarantini et al., 2023; Vahanian et al., 2021; Faroux et al., 2019; Ferraro et al., 2020; Patterson et al., 2021; Blanke et al., 2019; Bleakley and Monaghan, 2018; Knuuti et al., 2020; Moss et al., 2017; van den Boogert et al., 2018; Collet et al., 2018; Linde et al., 2020; Schmidt et al., 2018; Hansson et al., 2013 [6–25]) months, no difference in procedural complication rates, mortality rates, or number of unplanned ICA was observed between patients evaluated with only cCTA vs cCTA+ICA. ConclusionsUpfront cCTA instead of ICA for assessment of obstructive CAD in the diagnostic workup of patients with severe aortic stenosis referred to TAVI is feasible, safe, and with similar procedural and clinical outcomes. Randomized studies are warranted to further validate the safety of using CTA rather than ICA for coronary assessment in TAVI candidates.

Anesthésie locale comparée à l'anesthésie locorégionale dans les procédures TAVI par voie transfémorale

IntroductionTranscatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become the treatment of choice for the most fragile patients with severe aortic stenosis. The transfemoral route is preferred as the simplest and safest. The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy, tolerance and safety of local vs. locoregional anesthesia in trans-femoral TAVI procedures. Material and methodThis was a single-center retrospective study. Patients treated with femoral TAVI between February 25 and November 15, 2022 at the University Hospital of Reims were included, and two groups (local and locoregional anesthesia) were compared. ResultsTAVI success rate (92.9%), death rate (3.0%) and procedure duration (90.5 ± 13.5 minutes) did not differ between groups (p = 0.18, 0.15 and 0.55 respectively). For intra- and post-procedural treatments, the use of sedation, analgesics and benzodiazepines did not differ between groups. The cumulative dose of Remifentanil used per-procedure was lower in the local anesthesia group than in the locoregional anesthesia group (148.6 ± 71.9 mcg vs. 208.9 ± 110.0 mcg; p = 0.025). ConclusionsIn this non-randomized retrospective study, local and locoregional anesthesia had comparable safety and efficacy in transfemoral TAVI procedures. In a constrained context and with a view to simplification, these results encourage transfemoral TAVIs to be performed under local anaesthesia, and to consider a “PCI-like” approach, without the presence of an anaesthetist, for selected patients without respiratory, musculoskeletal or agitation disorders, or vascular approach difficulties.

Point-of-care ultrasound diagnosis of acute valvular emergencies

IntroductionAcute valvular emergencies, a time-sensitive diagnosis, are nearly impossible to diagnose without ultrasound, and missing the diagnosis can significantly impact patient outcomes. Many emergency physicians lack access to echo technicians and may be uncomfortable performing the ultrasound themselves. Approaching the paucity of review articles, none of which are focused for the emergency physician, can be quite daunting, even for those with extensive ultrasound training. ObjectiveOur goal is to provide a simple resource for emergency physicians to utilize ultrasound to diagnose acute valvular emergencies. We created a concise review that includes relevance and approach to the diagnosis, complete with live ultrasound images, reference cards, and focused figures for in-the-moment reference. MethodsA team of ultrasound fellowship-trained emergency medicine physicians determined the highest yield emergent conditions and oversaw the project. Each team member reviewed the etiology, incidence, and level of evidentiary support for each condition and then provided a guide to the appropriate procedure and evaluation with relevant additional guidance. An in-house graphics team was consulted to prepare original, concise figures for easy reference. All sections of the manuscript and figures were reviewed for accuracy and ease of use. DiscussionCritical aortic stenosis, infective endocarditis, left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, mitral stenosis, and mitral regurgitation were identified diagnoses for which ultrasound can provide immediate diagnostic information for emergency physicians. ConclusionThe use of ultrasound in the emergency department setting is a critical adjunct to care for patients with acute valvular emergencies. One should always consider a comprehensive, cardiology-performed echocardiogram in these scenarios.

Low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: an understanding is still a long way off

Low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: an understanding is still a long way off

P16 Concurrent sacroiliitis and infective endocarditis in a young male with congenital aortic stenosis: a diagnostic challenge and learning points

P16 Concurrent sacroiliitis and infective endocarditis in a young male with congenital aortic stenosis: a diagnostic challenge and learning points

Vascular complications in TAVI procedures: assessment, management, and outcomes-a retrospective study

ObjectiveTranscatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) has emerged as a pivotal therapeutic modality for aortic stenosis, predominantly in the elderly population. Despite its clinical success, the incidence and implications of vascular complications during TAVI remain a subject of critical concern. MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 140 patients who experienced vascular complications during TAVI procedures from a total cohort of 1343 cases. Patient demographics, clinical profiles, and procedural characteristics were scrupulously examined. Vascular complications, both intraoperative and postoperative, were identified through various diagnostic modalities. Statistical analyses were employed to discern associations and significance levels. Comparative assessments with international literature were performed to gain broader insights. ResultsThe study unveiled an overall incidence of vascular complications at approximately 10.44%. Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)-p-value (0.013), choice of valve type-p-value (0.016), and access point-p-value (0.027) demonstrated significant correlations with these complications. Complication incidences in TAVI procedures included pseudoaneurysms (4.76%), arteriovenous fistulas (1.49%), hematomas (0.37%), dissections (2.24%), arterial perforations (0.15%), stenosis/occlusion (0.37%), and closure device failures (1.94%). Over 70% of complications at the valve entry point result from dissections and closure device failures, while the pigtail entry point is predominantly linked to over 70% of pseudoaneurysms. Extended hospitalization (7.84 ± SD 3.14) was observed for patients experiencing vascular complications, underlining the importance of vigilant postprocedural care. ConclusionThis study provides comprehensive insights into vascular complications during TAVI procedures, shedding light on their incidence, risk factors, clinical presentations, diagnostic methodologies, and management strategies.

Quantification of Replacement Fibrosis in Aortic Stenosis: A Narrative Review on the Utility of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Aortic stenosis (AS) is associated with the development of replacement myocardial fibrosis/scar. Given the dose-dependent relationship between scar and clinical outcomes after aortic valve replacement (AVR) surgery, scar quantity may serve as an important risk-stratification tool to aid decision-making on the optimal timing of AVR. Scar is non-invasively assessed and quantified by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. Several quantification techniques exist, and consensus on the optimal technique is lacking. These techniques range from a visual manual method to fully automated ones. This review describes the different scar quantification techniques used and highlights their strengths and shortfalls within the context of AS. The two most commonly used techniques in AS include the semi-automated signal threshold versus reference mean (STRM) and full-width half-maximum (FWHM) techniques. The accuracy and reproducibility of these techniques may be hindered in AS by the coexistence of diffuse interstitial fibrosis and the presence of relatively small, non-bright scars. The validation of these techniques against histology, which is the current gold standard for scar quantification in AS, is limited. Based on the best current evidence, the STRM method using a threshold of three standard deviations above the mean signal intensity of remote myocardium is recommended. The high reproducibility of the FWHM technique in non-AS cohorts has been shown and merits further evaluation within the context of AS. Future directions include the use of quantitative T1 mapping for the detection and quantification of scar, as well as the development of serum biomarkers that reflect the fibrotic status of the myocardium in AS.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis-We Need a Well-Designed Randomized Control Trial.

Bicuspid aortic stenosis is a common pathology, typically seen in patients a decade younger than those with tricuspid valves. Surgical aortic valve replacement has been the mainstay treatment for bicuspid disease, especially considering the prevalence of concomitant aortic aneurysmal pathology. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement has shown equivalent results in bicuspid compared to tricuspid pathology in highly selected patient populations in single-arm registries and observational studies. For older patients with favorable bicuspid pathology, TAVR is reasonable. However, as younger patients with longer life expectancy are now being treated with TAVR, what is "best" is a question only answered by a well-designed randomized controlled trial. Herein, we describe the current evidence for treating bicuspid aortic stenosis and provide a framework for future trials. Yet, the question of equipoise remains, and who will we enroll?