Abstract Background Most cases of aortic valve bioprosthesis degenerative disease are currently best managed by transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Compared to redo surgery, advantages of TAVR include reduced invasiveness and a minimized prosthesis gradient; however, this approach is occasionally unfeasible due to the risk for coronary flow impairment or prosthesis stent dimensions unfit to accommodate an appropriately sized device. We present a case of an open TAVR after surgical leaflets excision of a failing aortic valve bioprosthesis. Case Summary A 76 years old female with type 2 diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidemia was referred to our institution for a malfunctioning 21 Carpentier Edwards pericardial aortic valve bioprosthesis implanted 9 years earlier. Patient was initially considered for a valve in valve TAVR. However, because of very low–lying coronary arteries origin at preoperative CT scan we estimated substantial chances for ostia impingement when prosthesis leaflets would have been stretched out by the deploying transcatheter device (Figure 1); although feasible, conventional redo surgery with bioprosthesis excision and re–suture was not preferred because of patients age and comorbidities; risk of damaging the aortic ring and wall including coronaries emergence when dissecting out the stent of the biopsosthesis and reimplanting a new one was also evaluated. We therefore opted for an hybrid procedure. After redo median sternotomy, careful dissection of adhesions, central Cardio–Pulmonary Bypass (CPB), aortic cross clamp and antegrade cardioplegia, a transverse aortotomy was done. The prosthesis was inspected and found grossly deteriorated: leaflets only were excised leaving the stent intact (Figure 2) and a 23 Sapien3 Ultra valve was carefully deployed under direct vision. Coronary ostia were checked and found patent. Myocardial ischemia and CPB times were 61 and 85 minutes respectively. Intensive care unit stay was 2 days. After a reassuring postoperative CT scan (Figure 3), patient was discharged home 11 days after surgery. Conclusions We found this approach a good compromise when dealing with challenging aortic valve reoperations, as it is associated to reduced surgical complexity and potential for less morbidity and mortality compared to conventional surgery when low coronary ostia make valve in valve TAVR unachievable.