Aortic Arch Surgery Research Articles

Agreement of in-ear temperature to core body temperature measures during invasive whole-body cooling for hypothermic circulatory arrest in aortic arch surgery.

Targeted temperature management (TTM) with therapeutic hypothermia (TH) during aortic arch surgery requires valid estimations of core body temperature. The ear canal and epitympanic region might be an easy-to-assess, noninvasive site for the read-out of supra-aortic, cerebral temperature. This observational cohort study comparatively investigated in-ear temperature and different core body temperature (cBT) measurements during TTM/TH for moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest (mHCA) in aortic arch surgery. In total 24 patients (mean age of 56.8 ± 17.5years; six females) were measured using infrared-thermography of the epitympanic region (BTtym), thermistor-based measurements at the esophagus (BTeso; gold standard), at the ear canal (BTear), at the nasopharynx (BTnas), in the bladder (BTves), and in the rectum (BTrec). The data analysis comprised absolute agreement (AA), bias, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and limit of agreement (LoA). The results revealed high AAs of BTtym, BTear, BTnas in reference to BTeso (biases 0.3-0.6°C), with also excellent ICCs > 0.9. BTves and BTrec showed lower AAs, higher biases of + 2.5°C to 3.1°C with moderate ICCs during mHCA. In the phases of rapid temperature changes, the biases and LoAs were higher throughout all BT measurements. Herein, BTtym performed best of all measurement sites. The study informs about the BT dynamics at different body sites during the mHCA procedure. It supports the approach of using minimally invasive in-ear techniques to estimate core body temperature in an intrahospital TTM/TH setting of mHCA.

Aortic arch replacement in patients with previous repair of acute aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Despite the popularity of the frozen elephant technique procedure in recent years, evidence is scarce regarding its utilisation for aortic arch replacement following previous acute aortic dissection repair. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to analyse clinical outcomes of aortic arch replacement in patients with previous repair of acute aortic dissection. A systematic literature search on PubMed, MEDLINE via Ovid, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science until March 2024 was performed for studies on open aortic arch replacement with or without frozen elephant technique procedure in adult patients after previous acute aortic dissection repair. Early and late postoperative mortality were primary, while postoperative complications were outcomes of interest. Additionally, a meta-analysis was performed to pool the early and late postoperative mortality. A total of 574 studies were identified, of which 9 studies including a total of 677 patients met the eligibility criteria. In-hospital or 30-day postoperative mortality and stroke were 0-17.5% and 0-7.7%, respectively. Duration of follow-up across all studies varied from 1.1 to 5.1 years. All-cause late mortality rate ranges from 5.9-30.5%. Aortic reintervention rate was 4.8-38.7%. The pooled early and late mortality rate were 8.7% ([95% CI: 5.7-13%], I2=52%) and 24.9% ([95% CI: 19.5-31.1%], I2=54%), respectively. Current evidence suggest that relatively younger patients with chronic post-dissection aneurysm or residual aortic dissection after acute aortic dissection repair can undergo an aortic arch replacement by a dedicated aortic team with acceptable mortality risk. However, postoperative neurological deficit remains an issue.

Whole-Body Perfusion in Neonates and Infants Undergoing Aortic Arch Surgery-Working Towards the New Standard.

Background: Neonatal aortic arch surgery remains one of the most challenging procedures in congenital cardiac surgery. In recent years, there has been a trend away from selective cerebral perfusion (SCP) and arrest of body circulation towards whole-body perfusion (WBP), a combination of SCP and lower-body perfusion (LBP), to facilitate arch surgery and preserve organ function. Methods: Retrospective, single-centre analysis was conducted of patients under one year of age undergoing aortic arch surgery from January 2014 until December 2022. SCP was used from January 2014-December 2017; WBP was implemented from January 2017-December 2022. Patients were separated according to the type of perfusion used during surgery, SCP or WBP. The cohort consisted of a total of 95 patients, 34 in the SCP group and 61 in the WBP group. Results: Patients in the WBP group showed significantly lower rates of intraoperative transfusions, namely red blood cells, fresh-frozen plasma and thrombocytes (p-value < 0.01, <0.01, and <0.01, respectively). The WBP group showed significantly lower creatinine and higher urine output values 24 and 72 h after surgery (p-value = 0.02, <0.01, respectively). The WBP group showed a significant lower incidence of major neurological complications (p-value 0.01). Binary logistic regression analyses showed favourable outcomes for the WBP group regarding 30-day mortality (OR = 0.03, CI = 0.003-0.391, p-value = <0.01), multiorgan failure (OR = 0.002, CI = 0-0.275, p-value = 0.01), neurological complications (OR = 0.994, CI = 0.998-1, p-value = 0.06) and postoperative renal replacement therapy (RRT) (OR = 0.989, CI = 0.983-0.995, p-value = <0.01). Conclusions: Patients with WBP received fewer intraoperative transfusions, showed improved postoperative renal function and suffered significantly fewer neurological complications.

Short-term outcomes of mild (≥30 ℃) vs. moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest in aortic arch surgery.

Hypothermia and antegrade cerebral perfusion (ACP) strategies in open aortic arch surgery (AAS) have improved significantly. The significance of the gradual temperature rise to mild hypothermia is quite apparent, however, its safety remains a challenge. Therefore, our objective was to explore the safety and efficacy of mild hypothermic circulatory arrest (Mi-HCA, ≥30 ℃). This retrospective cohort study enrolled in a total of 372 patients, and was performed at the Beijing Anzhen Hospital between January 2017 and November 2022. Among the 372 patients, 81 received AAS at ≥30 ℃, and the remaining 291 received the same at 22-29.9 ℃. Most acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) patients received total arch replacement (TAR) and frozen elephant trunk (FET) operation. Mi-HCA patients exhibited strongly augmented systemic temperature (26.19±1.63 vs. 31.40±0.79 ℃, P<0.01). The surgical, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), cross-clamp, circulatory arrest, and ACP durations were drastically diminished among Mi-HCA patients (all P<0.01). Moreover, the major adverse events (MAEs) incidence of Mi-HCA patients was significantly decreased (25.43% vs. 14.81%, P<0.05). Simultaneously, the Mi-HCA strategy also exhibited enhanced protection of blood cells, as well as myocardial and hepatic function. Nevertheless, multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that Mi-HCA strategy (≥30 ℃) was not a stand-alone risk factor for MAEs following AAS. The short-term outcomes and safety of Mi-HCA, in combination with ACP, in AAS are satisfactory. Additionally, relative to the traditional moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest (MHCA) approach, it can substantially decrease operation duration while improving patient clinical outcomes.

Neurocognitive Dysfunction After Short (

BackgroundIt has long been held that the safe duration of hypothermic circulatory arrest (HCA) is at least 25 to 30 minutes. However, this belief is based primarily on clinical outcomes research and has not been systematically investigated using more sensitive brain imaging and neurocognitive assessments. MethodsThis exploratory substudy of the randomized Cognitive Effects of Body Temperature During Hypothermic Circulatory Arrest (GOT ICE) trial, which compared outcomes for deep vs moderate hypothermia during aortic arch surgery, investigated the frequency of neurocognitive and structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) deficits with HCA of short (<20 minutes) duration. Neurocognitive deficit was defined as ≥1 SD decline in ≥1 of 5 cognitive domains on neurocognitive testing. ResultsOf 228 GOT ICE participants with complete 4-week cognitive data, 74.6% (n = 170 of 228) had HCA durations <20 minutes, including 59 patients randomized to deep hypothermia (<20.0 °C), 55 patients randomized to low-moderate (20.1-24.0 °C) hypothermia, and 56 randomized to high-moderate (24.1-28.0 °C) hypothermia. Of these participants, cognitive deficit was detected 4 weeks postoperatively in ∼40% of patients in all 3 groups (deep hypothermia, 22 of 59 [37.3%]; low-moderate hypothermia, 23 of 55 [41.8%]; and high-moderate hypothermia, 24 of 56 [42.9%]). Furthermore, in a subset of patients with complete MRI data (n = 43), baseline to 4-week postoperative right frontal lobe functional connectivity change was inversely associated with HCA duration (range, 8-17 minutes; P for familywise error rate < .01). ConclusionsEven short durations of HCA result in cognitive deficits in ∼40% of patients, independent of systemic hypothermia temperature. HCA duration was inversely associated with frontal lobe functional MRI connectivity, a finding suggesting that this brain region may be preferentially sensitive to HCA. Surgeons should be aware that even short durations of HCA may not provide complete neuroprotection after aortic arch surgery.

Enhancing Neuroprotection in Cardiac and Aortic Surgeries: A Narrative Review

Background: Neurological injury poses a significant challenge in aortic surgery, encompassing spinal cord injury from thoraco-abdominal aorta intervention or stroke post-surgery on the arch and ascending aorta. Despite ample literature and proposals, a fully effective strategy for preventing or treating neurological injury remains elusive. This narrative review aims to analyze the most common neuroprotective strategies implemented for aortic arch surgery and aortic surgery. Results: Results from the reviewed studies showed that several strategies, including deep hypothermia cardiac induction (DHCA) and cerebral perfusion techniques (retrograde cerebral perfusion, RCP, and selective anterograde cerebral perfusion, SACP) aim to mitigate these risks. Monitoring methods such as electroencephalogram (EEG), somatosensory evoked potential (SEPs), and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) offer valuable insights into cerebral function during surgery, aiding in the management of hypothermia and perfusion. Pharmacological agents and blood gas management (pH stat vs. alpha stat, hematocrit level, glycemic control) are crucial in preventing post-operative complications. Additionally meticulous management of atheromatous debris is essential to minimize embolic risks during surgery. Methods: For this narrative review, PubMed, Scopus, and Medline have been used to search articles about neuroprotection strategies in aortic and aortic arch surgeries. The search was narrowed to articles between 1975 and 2024. A total of 3418 articles were initially identified to be potentially relevant for this review. A total of 66 articles were included and were found to match the inclusion criteria. Conclusions: While an overabundance of neuroprotection strategies exists for cardiac surgery, particularly in procedures involving the aorta and the arch, their efficacy varies, with some well-documented and others still under scrutiny. Further research is imperative to advance our comprehension and refine prevention techniques for cardiac-surgery-related brain injury. This is crucial given its substantial contribution to both mortality and, notably, post-operative morbidity.

Comparative Evaluation of the Short-Term Outcome of Different Endovascular Aortic Arch Procedures.

Objectives: There are several endovascular treatment options to treat aortic arch and thoracic aortic pathologies with custom-made or surgeon-modified aortic stent grafts. This study seeks to assess endovascular treatment methods for aortic arch and thoracic aortic pathologies with no acceptable proximal landing zone for standard thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), comparing different treatment methods and evaluating technical success, intraoperative parameters and short-term outcomes. Methods: All patients undergoing elective or emergency endovascular treatment of aortic arch and thoracic aortic pathologies, with no acceptable landing zone for standard TEVAR, between 1 January 2010 and 31 March 2024, at the University Hospital Düsseldorf, Germany were included. An acceptable landing zone was defined as a minimum of 2 cm for sufficient sealing. All patients were not suitable for open surgery. Patients were categorized by an endovascular treatment method for a comprehensive comparison of pre-, intra- and postoperative variables. IBM SPSS29 was used for data analysis. Results: The patient cohort comprised 21 patients, predominantly males (81%), with an average age of 70.9 ± 9 years with no acceptable proximal landing zone for standard TEVAR procedure. The most treated aortic pathologies were penetrating aortic ulcers and chronic post-dissection aneurysms. Patients were sub-grouped according to the applied procedure as follows: five patients with chimney thoracic endovascular aortic repair (chTEVAR), seven patients with in situ fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair (isfTEVAR), six patients with custom-made fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair (cmfTEVAR) and three patients with custom-made branched thoracic endovascular aortic repair (cmbTEVAR). Emergency procedures involved two patients. There were significant differences in the total procedure and fluoroscopy time, as well as in contrast agent usage among the treatment groups. cmfTEVAR had the shortest total procedure time, while chTEVAR exhibited the highest contrast agent usage. The overall mortality rate among all procedures was 9.5% (two patients) and 4.7% for elective procedures, respectively. Deaths were associated with either retrograde type A dissection or stent graft infection. Both patients were treated with chTEVAR. There was one minor and one major stroke; these patients were treated with isfTEVAR. No endoleak occurred during any procedure. The reintervention rate for chTEVAR was 20% and 0% for all other procedures during the in-hospital stay. The patients who were treated with cmfTEVAR had no complications, the shortest operating and fluoroscopy time, and less contrast agent was needed in comparison with other treatment methods. Conclusions: Complex endovascular procedures of the aortic arch with custom-made or surgeon-modified aortic stent grafts offer a safe solution, with acceptable complication rates for patients who are not suitable for open aortic arch repair. In terms of procedure-related parameters and complication rates, a custom-made fenestrated TEVAR is potentially advantageous compared to the other endovascular techniques.

The optimal degree of core temperature for hypothermic circulatory arrest in complex aortic arch surgery: results from 1310 patients.

The optimal core temperature for hypothermic circulatory arrest during aortic arch surgery remains contentious. This study aims to evaluate patient outcomes under various temperatures within a large single-centre cohort. Between 2010 and 2018, patients diagnosed with type A aortic dissection underwent total arch replacement at Fuwai Hospital were enrolled. They were categorized into 4 groups: deep hypothermia group, low-moderate hypothermia group, high-moderate hypothermia group and mild hypothermia group. Clinical data were analysed to ascertain differences between the groups. A total of 1310 patients were included in this cohort. Operative mortality stood at 6.9% (90/1310), with a higher incidence observed in the deep hypothermia group [29 (12.9%); 35 (6.9%); 21 (4.8%); 5 (3.4%); all adjusted P < 0.05]. Overall 10-year survival was 80.3%. Long-term outcomes did not significantly differ among the groups. Multivariable logistic analysis revealed a protective effect of higher core temperature on operative mortality (odds ratio 0.848, 95% confidence interval 0.766-0.939; P = 0.001). High-moderate hypothermia emerged as an independent protective factor for operative mortality (odds ratio 0.303, 95% confidence interval 0.126-0.727; P = 0.007). Multivariable Cox analysis did not detect an effect of hypothermic circulatory arrest on long-term survival (all P > 0.05). High-moderate hypothermia (24.1-28°C) offers the most effective protection against surgical mortality and is therefore recommended. Different hypothermic circulatory arrest temperatures do not influence long-term survival or quality of life.

Optimization of Hypothermic Protocols for Neurocognitive Preservation in Aortic Arch Surgery: A Literature Review.

Shifts from deep to moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest (HCA) in aortic arch surgery necessitate an examination of their differential impacts on neurocognitive functions, especially structured verbal memory, given its significance for patient recovery and quality of life. This study evaluates and synthesizes evidence on the effects of deep (≤20.0 °C), low-moderate (20.1-24.0 °C), and high-moderate (24.1-28.0 °C) hypothermic temperatures on structured verbal memory preservation and overall cognitive health in patients undergoing aortic arch surgery. We evaluated the latest literature from major medical databases such as PubMed and Scopus, focusing on research from 2020 to 2024, to gather comprehensive insights into the current landscape of temperature management during HCA. This comparative analysis highlights the viability of moderate hypothermia (20.1-28.0 °C), supported by recent trials and observational studies, as a method to achieve comparable neuroprotection with fewer complications than traditional deep hypothermia. Notably, low-moderate and high-moderate temperatures have been shown to support substantial survival rates, with impacts on structured verbal memory preservation that necessitate careful selection based on individual surgical risks and patient profiles. The findings advocate for a nuanced approach to selecting hypothermic protocols in aortic arch surgeries, emphasizing the importance of tailoring temperature management to optimize neurocognitive outcomes and patient recovery. This study fills a critical gap in the literature by providing evidence-based recommendations for temperature ranges during HCA, calling for ongoing updates to clinical guidelines and further research to refine these recommendations. The implications of temperature on survival rates, complications, and success rates underpin the necessity for evolving cardiopulmonary bypass techniques and cerebral perfusion strategies to enhance patient outcomes in complex cardiovascular procedures.

Hematocrit and Renal Failure in Aortic Arch Surgery: A Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database Study

BackgroundThis study examined the association between cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) hematocrit and postoperative acute renal failure (ARF) in patients undergoing aortic arch surgery with hypothermic circulatory arrest. MethodsThe Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database was queried from 2011 to 2019 for patients undergoing aortic arch surgery with hypothermic circulatory arrest. A multivariable logistic regression model estimated the adjusted odds of postoperative ARF on the basis of CPB hematocrit. Effects were stratified by preoperative kidney function and the duration of hypothermic circulatory arrest by using interaction terms. The study also investigated the association between postoperative ARF and major postoperative outcomes by using multivariable regression models. ResultsOn adjusted analysis, higher CPB hematocrit (>20%-25%, >25%-30%, >30%) was associated with lower odds of ARF as compared with lower CPB hematocrit (≤20%) (>20-25%, aOR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.65-0.93; P = .006; >25%-30%, aOR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.50-0.84; P = .0007; >30%, aOR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.28-0.72; P = .0008). The predicted probability of postoperative ARF by CPB hematocrit was higher in patients with lower preoperative renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate, <60 mL/min/1.73 m2) (interaction P = .03). The association between hematocrit and postoperative ARF was not significantly modified by hypothermic circulatory arrest time (interaction P = .74). All postoperative outcomes were significantly worse in patients with postoperative ARF (all P < .0001). ConclusionsAmong patients undergoing aortic arch surgery, a higher CPB hematocrit level is associated with reduced likelihood of postoperative ARF. Preoperative renal function, but not hypothermic circulatory arrest duration, significantly modified this association. The maintenance of higher CPB hematocrit may reduce the incidence of postoperative ARF, especially for patients with poor preoperative renal function.

Cerebral Protection Strategies in Aortic Arch Surgery-Past Developments, Current Evidence, and Future Innovation.

Surgery of the aortic arch remains a complex procedure, with neurological events such as stroke remaining its most dreaded complications. Changes in surgical technique and the continuous innovation in neuroprotective strategies have led to a significant decrease in cerebral and spinal events. Different modes of cerebral perfusion, varying grades of hypothermia, and a number of pharmacological strategies all aim to reduce hypoxic and ischemic cerebral injury, yet there is no evidence indicating the clear superiority of one method over another. While surgical results continue to improve, novel hybrid and interventional techniques are just entering the stage and the question of optimal neuroprotection remains up to date. Within this perspective statement, we want to shed light on the current evidence and controversies of cerebral protection in aortic arch surgery, as well as what is on the horizon in this fast-evolving field. We further present our institutional approach as a large tertiary aortic reference center.

The frozen elephant trunk technique in acute aortic dissection: the ultimate solution? An institutional experience.

Acute aortic dissection remains a serious emergency in the field of cardiovascular medicine and a challenge for cardiothoracic surgeons. In the present study, we seek to compare the outcomes of different surgical techniques in the repair of type A acute aortic dissection. Between April 2015 and May 2023, 213 patients (82 women, aged: 63.9 ± 13.3 years) with acute aortic dissection (205 type A and 8 non-A-non-B dissections) underwent surgical treatment in our department. A total of 45 patients were treated with the frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique supported by the Thoraflex™ Hybrid prosthesis, 33 received total aortic arch replacement (TAR)-standard or conventional elephant trunk-treatment, and 135 were treated with hemiarch replacement (HR). Aortic arch surgery was performed in most patients under moderate hypothermic (28°C on average) circulatory arrest, with selective antegrade cerebral perfusion through the right axillary artery. The rates of early mortality were 17.8% (38 perioperative deaths) in the whole population, 8.9% in the FET group of patients, and 33% and 17% in the TAR and HR group of patients, respectively (P-value 0.025). The rate of spinal cord injury was 2.3% (five patients), and a paresis of recurrent laryngeal occurred in 3.7% of patients (seven patients, four were treated with FET). Permanent neurological dysfunction occurred in 27 patients (12.7%). After a mean follow-up of 3 years, the rate of mid-term mortality of discharged patients was 19.4% (34 deaths: 7 FET, 4 TAR, and 23 HR) and the overall mortality rate was 33.8% [72 deaths: 11 FET (24.4%); 15 TAR (45.4%); 46 HR (34.1%)]. A total of 8 patients (17.8%) in whom FET was applied received additional endovascular treatment in the descending aorta. In our institutional experience, we found that the frozen elephant trunk technique with a high-end Thoraflex Hybrid prosthesis proved its surgical suitability in the treatment of acute aortic dissection with favorable outcomes. The FET technique and our perioperative management led to comparable neurological outcomes and reduced mortality rates in these emergency cases.

Reverse cannulation method as a strategy for aortic aneurysm surgery: A computational fluid dynamics study on minimizing neurological risks

ObjectivesTo evaluate the blood flow velocity and wall shear stress in total arch replacement with a “shaggy” aorta, using computational fluid dynamics, and determine the optimal cannulation method. MethodsA patient-specific aortic arch aneurysm model was constructed by using computed tomography scans. Three cannulas were assessed, as follows: dispersive with a steep angle, dispersive with a gentle angle, and the endo-hole type. The cannula tips were oriented toward the aortic arch (standard direction) and aortic root (reversed direction), with an ideal angle (base orientation: 0°), tip orientations rotated 20° clockwise and counterclockwise from the base orientation. The variables of interest included the blood flow velocity, streamlines, wall shear stress, and flow distribution. ResultsThe standard direction resulted in variable accelerated flow and wall shear stress locations based on cannula tip orientation, leading to unstable cerebral branch flow. Minor deviation in the cannula tip angle and cannula type led to significant alterations in flow distribution. Conversely, in the reverse direction for all cannulas, no accelerated blood flow was observed in the proximal aortic arch or cerebral vessel ostia even with angular adjustments, helping maintain a stable cerebral branch flow. Minimal variation in blood flow distribution was observed across all cannula types and angles. ConclusionsOur simulations indicate that, irrespective of the cannula type or orientation, directing the cannula tip toward the aortic root (reversed direction) prevents accelerated blood flow in critical areas, suggesting its potential as an optimal approach for aortic arch surgery in “shaggy” aorta cases.

Does Higher Temperature During Moderate Hypothermic Circulatory Arrest Increase the Risk of Paraplegia in Acute DeBakey I Aortic Dissection Patients?

BackgroundIn this study, we sought to assess the safety of high-moderate (24.1-28.0°C) and low-moderate (20.1-24.0°C) systemic hypothermia during circulatory arrest (MHCA) in patients with acute DeBakey I aortic dissection (DeBakey I AAD), particularly concerning spinal cord protection. MethodsFrom 2009 to 2020, 1759 patients with DeBakey I AAD who underwent frozen elephant trunk and total arch replacement surgery at a tertiary centre were divided into preoperative malperfusion (viscera, spinal cord, or lower extremities) and nonmalperfusion subgroups. The baseline differences were balanced with the use of propensity score matching. Prognoses were compared between those who were subjected to high-MHCA (nasopharyngeal temperature 24.1-28.0°C) and low-MHCA (nasopharyngeal temperature 20.1-24.0°C). ResultsIn the nonmalperfusion subgroup (n = 1389), 469 pairs of matched patients showed lower in-hospital mortality and incidence of acute kidney injury in the high-MHCA group than in the low-MHCA group: in-hospital mortality 7.0% vs 10.2% (P = 0.01); acute kidney injury, 57.1% vs 64.6% (P < 0.01). The duration of mechanical ventilation was shorter in the high-MHCA group than that in the low-MHCA group (P = 0.03). No significant difference in the incidence of paraplegia was observed between the 2 groups. In the malperfusion subgroup (n = 370), 112 pairs of matched patients showed a higher incidence of paraplegia in the high-MHCA group than in the low-MHCA group (15.9% vs 6.5%; P = 0.04). ConclusionsThe safety of high-MHCA, a commonly used temperature management strategy during aortic arch surgery, was recognised in most patients with DeBakey I AAD. However, among patients with preoperative distal organ malperfusion, low-MHCA may be more appropriate owing to an increased risk of postoperative paraplegia associated with high-MHCA.

Aortic arch de-branching for suspected expanding perigraft haematoma after previous acute type-A dissection repair with AMDS stent: a technique for a potential future problem

BackgroundAcute Stanford type- A aortic dissections make up a large part of emergency cardiac surgery. They also carry a significant burden of morbidity. New techniques to aid aortic remodelling include the Ascyrus Medical Dissection Stent (AMDS): Its increasing use, looks to present a potential problem in cases where surgery involving the aortic arch may be required.Case reportWe present the case of a 49-year-old male who underwent urgent redo-surgery for total arch replacement and de-branching following recent replacement of the ascending aorta for acute type-A dissection, where an AMDS stent was deployed. The patient underwent total arch replacement with a stented tri-furcate prosthesis and de-branching of arch vessels with the stent landed inside the previous AMDS, to good effect.ConclusionThis case highlights a possible approach to aortic arch surgery in patients who have previous had AMDS insertion.

Induced Moderate Hypothermia in Aortic Rupture With Retroperitoneal Bleeding: A Randomized Porcine Study.

Induced hypothermia improves outcome in aortic arch surgery, neonatal neurointensive care, and transplant surgery for example. In contrast, spontaneous hypothermia has been associated with worse outcomes in patients suffering from hemorrhagic shock, mostly explained by its adverse effects on the coagulation system. We investigated if induced hypothermia would impair short-term survival in experimental aortic rupture with retroperitoneal bleeding. Anesthetized pigs were randomized into 2 groups: hypothermia by peritoneal lavage of ice-cold Ringer's acetate and external cooling (n = 10) and normothermia (n = 10). Aortic rupture with retroperitoneal bleeding was induced by endovascular means creating a 6 mm hole in the retroperitoneal portion of abdominal aorta. Survival (primary outcome), hemodynamics, and arterial blood gases including lactate were collected and analyzed up to 180 min after aortic rupture. The body temperature (mean ± standard deviation) in the hypothermic group was 31.5 ± 1.0 °C and 38.7 ± 0.4 °C in the normothermic group at the time for aortic rupture. Survival up to 180 min after the retroperitoneal bleeding was significantly higher in the hypothermic compared with the normothermic group (P = 0.023). Induced hypothermia did not impair survival in this experimental retroperitoneal aortic bleeding model in anesthetized pigs. This finding may indicate a minor role for the coagulation system in this type of bleeding.

Stroke and stroke prevention in cardiac and thoracic aortic surgery

Perioperative stroke and neurological injuries in general are complications that can occur during and after cardiac surgery, particularly in aortic surgery that involves the aortic arch. The overall incidence of early and delayed stroke is about 1% according to recent meta-analyses. This incidence depends on interindividual risk factor profile and type of surgery. In order to reduce cerebrovascular complications during cardiac surgery, a number of preventative measures can be taken, including the evaluation of atherosclerotic plaques, the site of cannulation and neuroprotection strategies. During aortic arch surgery, main strategies for cerebral protection are represented by deep hypothermic circulatory arrest, retrograde and antegrade cerebral perfusion.

Management of Anomalous Left Vertebral Artery During Open Total Arch Replacement

BackgroundAn anomalous left vertebral artery (aLVA) can complicate aortic arch surgery. We examined the safety of various aLVA revascularization strategies during open total arch replacement. MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated 92 patients undergoing total arch replacement from January 2018 to May 2023 and identified 11 patients with aLVA. A comparison group (n = 31) with conventional 3-branched anatomy was selected by 3:1 matching on age, sex, circulatory arrest time, and operative mortality. Forty-two patients were selected for analysis. The primary outcome was perioperative stroke within 30 days. Secondary outcomes included spinal cord ischemia and long-term stroke. ResultsPatients with aLVA had an average age of 53 ±16 years. Indications included Stanford type A dissection (n = 4), chronic dissection with aneurysmal degeneration (n = 4), and primary aneurysmal disease (n = 3). The aLVA was reconstructed by transposition to the left carotid (n = 2) or subclavian (n = 8). In 1 case, partial zone 2 arch replacement was performed proximal to the aLVA and manipulation was not required. Total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk was performed in 8 of 11 cases. No postoperative mortality was observed. One patient experienced transient postoperative stroke (9% vs 9%, P = 1.00). One patient received lumbar drain for suspected spinal cord ischemia (9% vs 7%, P = 0.59). One patient experienced stroke 6 months post operation. One-year patency of transposition was 100%. ConclusionsThe presence of aLVA does not impact outcomes of open arch surgery. Our strategy to preserve the aLVA may be preferable to simple ligation. We describe several safe and feasible approaches for reimplantation of this anomalous variant.

The Use of the CardioCel 3D 60° Patch for Aortic Arch Reconstruction in Infancy—A Word of Caution

BackgroundThere are limited data on outcomes after implantation of the CardioCel 3D 60° patch in great vessel repair. After anecdotally witnessing an increase in negative outcomes, we reviewed our experience using this patch in our neonate and infant patients undergoing aortic arch repair. MethodsAortic arch repair with implantation of the CardioCel 3D 60° patch was performed in 24 patients between July 2018 and July 2021. Dominant cardiac morphologies were hypoplastic left heart syndrome (66%), atrioventricular canal defects (13%), and other (21%). Median age at implantation was 44 days (interquartile range [IQR], 6-112 days). Recurrent obstruction was defined as the need for reoperation or catheter intervention or recurrent peak pressure gradient of descending aorta ≥25 mm Hg on echocardiography. ResultsFive deaths occurred after a median of 217 days (IQR, 69-239 days). Twelve patients (50%) had recurrent obstruction. Three patients (13%) required redo aortic arch operation after a median of 148 days (IQR, 128-193 day), with extensive fibrous coating of the patch interior causing obstruction. Eleven patients (46%) required at least 1 balloon angioplasty on their aorta after a median of 102 days (IQR, 83-130 days) after repair, and 3 needed >1 catheter intervention. The estimated probability of having recurrent obstruction was 85% at 6 months and 71% at the 1-year follow (P = .06). ConclusionsRecurrent aortic obstruction occurred in half of our patients shortly after repair. The use of the CardioCel 3D 60° patch for aortic arch reconstruction in neonates and infants should be reevaluated.

Open, endovascular or hybrid repair of aortic arch disease: narrative review of diverse strategies with diverse options.

The management of aortic arch disease is complex. Open surgical management continues to evolve, and the introduction of endovascular repair is revolutionizing aortic arch surgery. Although these innovative techniques have generated the opportunity for better outcomes in select patients, they have also introduced confusion and uncertainty regarding best practices. In New York, we developed a collaborative group, the New York Aortic Consortium, as a means of cross-linking knowledge and working together to better understand and treat aortic disease. In our meeting in May 2023, regional aortic experts and invited international experts discussed the contemporary management of aortic arch disease, differences in interpretation of the available literature and the integration of endovascular technology into disease management. We summarized the current state of aortic arch surgery in this review article. Approaches to aortic arch repair have evolved substantially, whether it be methods to reduce cerebral ischaemia, improve haemostasis, simplify future operations or expand options for high-risk patients with endovascular approaches. However, the transverse aortic arch remains challenging to repair. Among our collaborative group of cardiac/aortic surgeons, we discovered a wide disparity in our practice patterns and our management strategies of patients with aortic arch disease. It is important to build unique institutional expertise in the context of complex and evolving management of aortic arch disease with open surgery, endovascular repair and hybrid approaches, tailored to the risk profiles and anatomical specifics of individual patients.