Aortic Arch Branch Vessels Research Articles

The requirement for smart catheters for advanced endovascular applications

Endovascular techniques are well established in minimally invasive vascular surgery. Stent-graft technology is evolving. This will allow more complex aortic pathology to be treated. Current limitations in this equipment include the reliance on selective catheters along with trial and error to cannulate visceral or aortic arch branch vessels. This can lead to prolonged operations with increased radiation and contrast load to the patient with inevitable increase in peri-operative morbidity. A smart catheter that could expedite target vessel catheterization, minimize repeat catheter changes, and provide greater haptic feedback would enhance the endovascular surgeon's armamentarium. This would lead to broader and safer application of endovascular surgery.

Double-Barrel Technique for Preservation of Aortic Arch Branches During Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) may involve either planned or inadvertent coverage of aortic branch vessels when stent grafts are implanted into the aortic arch. Vital branch vessels may be preserved by surgical debranching techniques or by placement of additional stents to maintain vessel patency. We report our experience with a double-barrel stent technique used to maintain aortic arch branch vessel patency during TEVAR. Seven patients underwent TEVAR using the double-barrel technique, with placement of branch stents into the innominate (n = 3), left common carotid (n = 3), and left subclavian (n = 1) arteries alongside an aortic stent graft. Gore TAG endografts were used in all cases, and either self-expanding stents (n = 6) or balloon-expandable (n = 1) stents were utilized to maintain patency of the arch branch vessels. In three cases the double-barrel stent technique was used to restore patency of an inadvertently covered left common carotid artery. Four planned cases involved endograft deployment proximally into the ascending aorta with placement of an innominate artery stent (n = 3) and coverage of the left subclavian artery with placement of a subclavian artery stent (n = 1). TEVAR using a double-barrel stent was technically successful with maintenance of branch vessel patency and absence of type I endoleak in all seven cases. One case of zone 0 endograft placement with an innominate stent was complicated by a left hemispheric stroke that was attributed to a technical problem with the carotid-carotid bypass. On follow-up of 2-18 months, all double-barrel branch stents and aortic endografts remained patent without endoleak, migration, or loss of device integrity. The double-barrel stent technique maintains aortic branch patency and provides additional stent-graft fixation length during TEVAR to treat aneurysms involving the aortic arch. Moreover, the technique uses commercially available devices and permits complete aortic arch coverage (zone 0) without a sternotomy. Although initial outcomes are encouraging, long-term durability remains unknown.

Coverage of the left subclavian artery during thoracic endovascular aortic repair

Thoracic aortic stent grafts require proximal and distal landing zones of adequate length to effectively exclude thoracic aortic lesions. The origins of the left subclavian artery and other aortic arch branch vessels often impose limitations on the proximal landing zone, thereby disallowing endovascular repair of more proximal thoracic lesions. Between October 2000 and November 2005, 112 patients received stent grafts to treat lesions involving the thoracic aorta. The proximal aspect of the stent graft partially or totally occluded the origin of at least one great vessel in 28 patients (25%). The proximal attachment site was in zone 0 in one patient (3.6%), zone 1 in three patients (10.7%), and zone 2 in 24 patients (85.7%). Patients with proximal implantation in zones 0 or 1 underwent debranching procedures of the supra-aortic vessels before stent graft repair. In one patient who underwent zone 1 deployment, the left subclavian artery was revascularized before stent graft deployment. Among patients who underwent zone 2 deployment with partial or complete occlusion of the left subclavian artery, none underwent prior revascularization. Patients were assessed postoperatively and at follow-up for development of neurologic symptoms as well as symptoms of left upper extremity claudication or ischemia. Mean follow-up was 7.3 months. Among the 24 patients with zone 2 implantation, 10 (42%) had partial left subclavian artery coverage at the time of their primary procedure. A total of 19 patients experienced complete cessation of antegrade flow through the origin of the left subclavian artery without revascularization at the time of the initial endograft repair as a result of a secondary procedure or as a consequence of left subclavian artery thrombosis. Left upper extremity symptoms developed in three (15.8%) patients that did not warrant intervention, and rest pain developed in one (5.3%), which was treated with the deployment of a left subclavian artery stent. Two primary (type IA and type III) endoleaks (7.1%) and one secondary endoleak (type IA) (3.6%) were observed in patients who underwent zone 2 deployment. Three cerebrovascular accidents were observed. Thoracic aortic lesions were successfully excluded in all patients who underwent supra-aortic debranching procedures. Intentional coverage of the origin of the left subclavian artery to obtain an adequate proximal landing zone during endovascular repair of thoracic aortic lesions is well tolerated and may be managed expectantly, with some exceptions.

Suppression of intravascular signal on fat-saturated contrast-enhanced thoracic MR arteriograms.

To assess the prevalence of artifactual signal intensity loss within the aortic arch and proximal branch vessels on fat-saturated contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) arteriograms of the thoracic aorta and to hypothesize about the cause of the loss of signal intensity. Between January and June 1998, 105 consecutive MR arteriograms of the thoracic aorta were acquired in 103 patients at 1.5 T. Imaging included an arterial phase three-dimensional (3D) fat-saturated contrast-enhanced gradient-echo (GRE) sequence followed by a delayed two-dimensional (2D) transverse fat-saturated GRE sequence. All MR images were reviewed by two radiologists who were blinded to patient history and results of imaging studies and who evaluated the images for the presence of intraluminal loss of signal intensity in the aortic arch and the proximal branch vessels. Intravascular loss of signal intensity was present in at least one vessel on 23 of the 105 arterial phase 3D studies. Seventy-one of 91 left subclavian arterial segments had loss of signal intensity on the delayed 2D studies. Intravascular signal intensity loss can be present on contrast-enhanced fat-saturated images of the aortic arch and proximal branch vessels, particularly the left subclavian artery. This phenomenon, which is to the authors' knowledge previously unreported and which is hypothesized to result from undesired water saturation, should not be misinterpreted as stenotic or occlusive vascular disease.

Minimally invasive approach for aortic arch branch vessel reconstruction

Minimally invasive aortic arch branch vessel reconstruction was successfully accomplished in four patients over the past 3 years. There were no operative complications. Three patients had an uneventful hospital course, ranging from 3 to 5 days. The fourth patient with multiple medical problems and severe peripheral vascular disease had a prolonged hospital course for reasons unrelated to the surgical procedure. This minimally invasive surgical exposure can be used to effectively and safely repair innominate and left common carotid artery lesions. (J Vasc Surg 2000;31:200-2.)

Variations in Aortic Arch Branch Vessel Anatomy as Seen by Aortography

Several variations in the anatomy of the aortic arch and its branches have been described in the literature based on cadaveric dissection findings. Many of these variations can also be detected by aortic arch arteriography. This study was undertaken to determine the incidence and pattern of variations in aortic arch branch vessel anatomy as seen by aortography. Seventy-six of 705 (10.8%) arteriograms showed variations from normal. A total of 7 variant patterns was identified. The most common abnormality was common origin of innominate artery and left common carotid artery.