Antinuclear Antibody Test Research Articles

BI44 Latent tuberculosis reactivation in a patient with chronic plaque psoriasis treated with ustekinumab with a review of the literature

Abstract Ustekinumab, a monoclonal antibody against interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23, is used for the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. The IL-12 pathway also plays an important role in regulating immunity to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. A multicentre, double-blind, randomized clinical trial study of 121 Korean patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis revealed at least 75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score after 12 weeks of ustekinumab treatment. Ten cases of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) were reported. Lupea-Chilom et al. [Lupea-Chilom DS, Solovan CS, Farcas SS et al. Latent tuberculosis in psoriasis patients on biologic therapies: real-world data from a care center in Romania. Medicina (Kaunas) 2023; 59: 1015] conducted a retrospective observational study on a total of 97 patients with severe psoriasis who were on different biologics. That study showed that two of seven patients on monotherapy ustekinumab developed LTBI. In this abstract, we present the case of a 49-year-old White woman with resistant moderate-to-severe chronic psoriasis without psoriatic arthritis who developed LTBI while on ustekinumab. She was diagnosed with psoriasis in 2012 with involvement of the scalp, flexural, vulval and gluteal regions as well as the nails. She was started on ustekinumab in October 2013 following a satisfactory prebiologics screen (including a negative QuantiFERON test). Her PASI score was zero at week 12. In 2017, she developed a malar rash and positive antinuclear antibody test, which was not tested prior to starting biologics. As lupus is a potential adverse effect of this medication, the ustekinumab was stopped in April 2017. Further rheumatological investigations ruled out lupus and ustekinumab was restarted in November 2017. As part of the screening process prior to restarting treatment, she had a repeat QuantiFERON test, which was positive. The respiratory team reviewed the patient and issued a 3-month course of rifampicin and isoniazid to treat LTBI. Following a few months of monitoring, it was deemed safe to restart ustekinumab in December 2018 and her PASI improved. In February 2020, due to the COVID pandemic, this medication had to be stopped. She was started on acitretin as an alternative in 2021 with a resulting worsening of her condition. In December 2021, the patient was restarted on ustekinumab. In this abstract, we illustrate that ustekinumab has the potential to reactivate latent tuberculosis, a phenomenon that is infrequently reported and attributed to its impact on the IL-12 pathway. To address this concern, we recommend conducting repeated annual screening during treatment in addition to a comprehensive baseline evaluation, including a chest X-ray and QuantiFERON test. Additionally, it is advisable to consider initiating isoniazid chemoprophylaxis concurrently with ustekinumab treatment as a precautionary measure.

The Onset of Antinuclear Antibodies (ANAs) as a Potential Risk Factor for Mortality and Morbidity in COVID-19 Patients: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

The immune system's amplified response to SARS-CoV-2 may lead to the production of autoantibodies, but their specific impact on disease severity and outcome remains unclear. This study aims to assess if hospitalized COVID-19 patients face a worse prognosis based on ANA presence, even without autoimmune diseases. We performed a retrospective, single-center, observational cohort study, enrolling 638 COVID-19 patients hospitalized from April 2020 to March 2021 at Hospital "Policlinico Riuniti" of Foggia (Italy). COVID-19 patients with a positive ANA test exhibited a significantly lower 30-day survival rate (64.4% vs. 83.0%) and a higher likelihood of severe respiratory complications during hospitalization than those with negative ANA screening (35.4% vs. 17.0%) (p < 0.001). The association between poor prognosis and ANA status was identified by calculating the HALP score (Hemoglobin-Albumin-Lymphocyte-Platelet), which was lower in COVID-19 patients with a positive ANA test compared to ANA-negative patients (108.1 ± 7.4 vs. 218.6 ± 11.2 AU; p < 0.011). In detail, COVID-19 patients with a low HALP showed a lower 30-day survival rate (99.1% vs. 83.6% vs. 55.2% for high, medium, and low HALP, respectively; p < 0.001) and a higher incidence of adverse respiratory events compared to those with high and medium HALP (13.1% vs. 35.2% vs. 64.6% for high, medium, and low HALP, respectively; p < 0.001). In summary, ANA positivity in COVID-19 patients appears to be linked to a more aggressive disease phenotype with a reduced survival rate. Furthermore, we propose that the HALP score could serve as a valuable parameter to assess prognosis for COVID-19 patients.

A Clinical Picture of Unselected Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in a Tertiary Hungarian Center-A Spectrum Ranging from Pure Lupus to Overlap Syndromes.

Introduction: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multidimensional disease; however, the association of another systemic autoimmune disease further complicates its clinical presentation. Aim: We decided to investigate whether the association of overlap syndromes is linked with a different clinical picture compared to pure lupus and whether this association changes the sensitivity of the following commonly used criteria: the 2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology (EULAR/ACR), the ACR-1997 and the 2012 Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) criteria. Method: We performed a retrospective observational study among 382 patients afflicted with lupus: we measured as much of the full clinical and laboratory picture as possible in an unselected cohort. The diagnosis of SLE and other systemic autoimmune diseases was established by the rheumatologist in routine care and then the authors compared the characteristics of patients with pure lupus and those with overlapping pathologies. The diagnosis rates were compared to those that were determined based on the three classification criteria in order to identify various sensitivities and whether the existence of an overlap affects their rates. The fulfillment of each set of criteria was calculated using an Excel-based automatic calculation. Results: Among the patients, the ACR 1997's sensitivity was 81.2% (310 patients), and the SLICC 2012 criteria achieved 94.5% sensitivity (361 patients). The 2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria resulted in a slightly lower sensitivity (90.3%-345 patients) when compared to the original publication (96%) due to the lower sensitivity of our anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) test (measured via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)). Nearly all ANA-negative (21/22-95%) patients showed a positive lupus-associated antibody test. The proportion of ANA-negative cases showed no significant difference among pure and overlap patients. No significant difference was found between patients with overlap (138 patients-36%) and pure SLE (244 patients-64%) through the use of these criteria, with the exception of the SLICC criteria (ACR: 80.4% vs. 81.6%; SLICC: 97.4% vs. 92.6%, p = 0.035; EULAR/ACR 2019: 91.4% vs. 89.6%). Patients with an overlap syndrome were significantly older (55 vs. 50 years, p = 0.001), more likely to suffer from interstitial lung disease (ILD: 20% vs. 11%, p = 0.0343) and less frequently showed class III/IV lupus nephritis (7% vs. 14%, p = 0.029) when compared with their pure lupus counterparts. Conclusion: All investigated criteria regarding sensitivity were similar to the original publication's findings. The sensitivity of the EULAR/ACR 2019 classification criterion in cases with overlap syndrome proved excellent, with results very similar to patients afflicted with pure SLE. In the presence of an overlap syndrome, we found significantly fewer patients with lupus nephritis III/IV but no differences in other typical lupus organ manifestation beyond the kidney, whereas we found a higher proportion of ILD in patients with an overlap, indicating that the presence of an overlap syndrome significantly influences the observed clinical picture in real-world conditions.

Comparison of quantitative and qualitative anti-dsDNA assays.

In evaluation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies (anti-dsDNA) play a significant role in diagnosis, monitoring SLE activity, and assessing prognosis. However, evaluations of the performance and limitations for recently developed methods for anti-dsDNA assessment are sparse. Specimens used for antinuclear antibody testing (n = 129) were evaluated for anti-dsDNA assay comparability across 4 medical centers in the United States. The methods compared were Werfen Quanta Lite dsDNA, Zeus Scientific dsDNA Enzyme Immunoassay, Bio-Rad multiplex immunoassay (MIA) dsDNA, ImmunoConcepts Crithidia, and Bio-Rad Laboratories Crithidia. For quantitative anti-dsDNA measurements, Spearman's correlation coefficient was highest between Zeus and Werfen (ρ = 0.86; CI, 0.81-0.90; P < .0001). Comparison of MIA to Werfen or Zeus yielded similar results to each other (ρ = 0.58; CI, 0.44-0.68; P < .0001; and ρ = 0.59; CI, 0.46-0.69; P < .0001, respectively), but lower than the correlation between Zeus and Werfen. Positive concordance between assays ranged from 31.4% to 97.1%, and negative concordance between assays ranged from 58.5% to 100%. The detection of anti-dsDNA in those with SLE diagnosis ranged from 50.9% to 77.4% for quantitative assays and 15.1% to 24.5% for Crithidia assays. Current quantitative anti-dsDNA assays are not interchangeable for patient follow-up. Crithidia-based assays demonstrate high negative concordance and lack positive concordance among the methods.

Using Antinuclear Antibody Testing in Pediatric Rheumatology.

The antinuclear antibody (ANA) test is frequently used for the identification of patients who are at a high risk of developing autoimmune rheumatological diseases. The aim of this study is to evaluate the final diagnoses of patients applied to the pediatric rheumatology outpatient clinic with a positive ANA test result. In this study, the medical records of 283 children who had ANA positivity between January 2010 and January 2022 were evaluated retrospectively. All patients were younger than 18 years of age at diagnosis and were followed up in the pediatric rheumatology department for at least 6 months. The majority of the patients were females (69%), and the mean age was 9.9 ± 4.7 years. 94% of the ANA tests were requested in pediatric rheumatology outpatient clinics, and 6% in general pediatrics and other outpatient clinics. Arthritis was the most common reason for ANA testing (41.7%). Of the patients who had ANA positivity, 37% were diagnosed with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), 15% with connective tissue diseases, 10% with autoinflammatory disease, and 7% with vasculitides. Positivity at 1/320 and 1/640 titers were more common in the patients diagnosed with autoimmune connective tissue diseases or JIA compared to the patients without these diagnoses (P = .009 and P = .013, respectively). The ANA test should be judiciously requested by pediatric rheumatologists, especially in suspected cases of autoimmune rheumatic disorders and JIA patients to aid in classification. Indiscriminate use of the ANA test for screening may potentially misguide clinicians.

Detection of antinuclear antibodies: recommendations from EFLM, EASI and ICAPEFLM Paper

&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Aim:&lt;/b&gt; Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) are important for the diagnosis of various autoimmune diseases. ANA are usually detected by indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) using HEp-2 cells (HEp-2 IFA). There are many variables influencing HEp-2 IFA results, such as subjective visual reading, serum screening dilution, substrate manufacturing, microscope components and conjugate. Newer developments on ANA testing that offer novel features adopted by some clinical laboratories include automated computer-assisted diagnosis (CAD) systems and solid phase assays (SPA).&lt;/br&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Methods:&lt;/b&gt; A group of experts reviewed current literature and established recommendations on methodological aspects of ANA testing. This process was supported by a two round Delphi exercise. International expert groups that participated in this initiative included (i) the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working Group "Autoimmunity Testing"; (ii) the European Autoimmune Standardization Initiative (EASI); and (iii) the International Consensus on ANA Patterns (ICAP).&lt;/br&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Results:&lt;/b&gt; In total, 35 recommendations/statements related to (i) ANA testing and reporting by HEp-2 IFA; (ii) HEp-2 IFA methodological aspects including substrate/conjugate selection and the application of CAD systems; (iii) quality assurance; (iv) HEp-2 IFA validation/verification approaches and (v) SPA were formulated. Globally, 95% of all submitted scores in the final Delphi round were above 6 (moderately agree, agree or strongly agree) and 85% above 7 (agree and strongly agree), indicating strong international support for the proposed recommendations.&lt;/br&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Conclusions:&lt;/b&gt; These recommendations are an important step to achieve high quality ANA testing.&lt;/br&gt;

Relevance of antinuclear antibody in diagnosis and characteristics of multiple sclerosis

BackgroundCriteria for multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis rely upon clinical and paraclinical data that are supportive of MS in the absence of a better explanation. Patients referred for consideration of a MS diagnosis often undergo an extensive serologic workup including antinuclear antibody (ANA) testing, even when an individual already meets diagnostic criteria for MS. It is unclear whether ANA serostatus is associated with clinical outcomes in MS. The present study aims to determine if ANA seropositivity in those referred with concern for MS differs in those who meet 2017 revised McDonald criteria compared to those who did not receive a diagnosis of MS. Associations between ANA seropositivity and clinical or radiological phenotype of MS patients are also explored. MethodsThe cohort included people at least 18 years old, referred to our tertiary care MS center with concern for MS (regardless of prior diagnosis) who had an ANA test with known titer completed within one year of first evaluation. Electronic health record (EHR) charts were manually reviewed, and MRIs underwent blinded review by a radiologist with training in neuroradiology. Diagnosis of MS was determined by a neuroimmunologist and was based on 2017 revised McDonald Criteria. Results are reported as odds ratios from multivariable logistic regression analyses adjusted for age, sex at birth, race, smoking history, personal history of comorbid autoimmune conditions, and family history of autoimmunity. Within the MS cohort, similar analytical models were performed to assess association between ANA and clinical and radiological characteristics. ResultsA final cohort of 258 patients was analyzed (out of 542 referrals): 106 nonMS and 152 with MS. There was no association between MS (vs. nonMS) diagnosis and ANA status (ANA positive n = 74) in the multivariable models (OR 1.5, 95 % CI 0.82, 2.72, p = 0.20). Among those with MS, there was no association of ANA seropositivity with the odds of atypical brain MRI features, number of cardinal MRI areas involved, location of MRI lesions, or of having an atypical presentation of first demyelinating event. Black race (OR 2.8, 95 % CI 1.27, 6.26, p = 0.01) and family history of autoimmunity (OR 2.1, 95 % CI 1.09, 3.98, p = 0.03) were independently associated with increased odds of ANA positivity. Within the MS cohort analysis, progressive MS (PMS; vs relapsing-remitting MS), a covariate in the model, appeared to be at higher odds of being ANA positive (OR 3.6, 95 % CI 1.03, 13.05, p = 0.046) but only when assessing mean area of cardinal MS locations. ConclusionsWhile ANA testing does not appear to be useful in distinguishing MS from non-MS, it remains less clear as to whether it may be associated with differences in the clinical course of MS (relapsing-remitting vs progressive). Future studies should aim to systematically evaluate whether those who are ANA positive are more likely, in well-designed and representative prospective cohorts, to be diagnosed with or develop progressive MS. Whether a positive ANA early in MS is associated with increased risk over time of developing or diagnosing another systemic autoimmune disease would also be of interest.

Computer-aided immunofluorescence microscopy in antinuclear antibody testing; increasing role of artificial intelligence in diagnostics

Computer-aided immunofluorescence microscopy in antinuclear antibody testing; increasing role of artificial intelligence in diagnostics

Current laboratory practice for anti nuclear antibody testing in Tunisia

Current laboratory practice for anti nuclear antibody testing in Tunisia

Systemic lupus erythematosus in a 15-year-old female with multiple splenic nodules: A case report

BACKGROUND Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic inflammatory disease primarily affecting young females. SLE can invade any organ, and various forms of splenic invasion have been reported. Manifestations include splenomegaly and splenic infarction, rupture, and calcification. The study encountered a rare case of splenic involvement, with nodules of various sizes without calcifications or ruptures. CASE SUMMARY A 15-year-old girl presented with arthralgia, weight loss, fever, increased levels of inflammatory markers, and positive antinuclear antibody test results. The patient was diagnosed with SLE. She was asymptomatic while taking steroids and hydroxychloroquine. Ten months after discharge, the patient developed a fever and abdominal pain. Lupus enteritis was suspected, and abdominopelvic computed tomography (AP-CT) was performed. There were no specific findings in the gastrointestinal tract, but multiple splenic nodules were observed. Infection or hemangioma was considered; however, no specific radiological findings were observed. A biopsy of the spleen was performed to determine the possibility of malignancy. The histological findings of the spleen included extensive periarteriolar necrosis with hematoxylin bodies and numerous karyorrhectic debris. Based on the biopsy results, the patient was diagnosed with an SLE flare-up and was maintained on high-dose steroids and immunosuppressants. CONCLUSION As disease activity increased, multiple nodules in the spleen that were previously unseen were observed using AP-CT and histologically confirmed. Spleen invasion by SLE can appear in multiple nodular forms and patterns. Therefore, physicians should consider these findings when differentiating these nodules from infections and malignancies.

Assessment of Anti-Nuclear Antibodies and Anti-Extractable Nuclear Antigen Levels in Breast Cancer Patients

Anti-nuclear antibodies (ANAs) are autoantibodies synthesized in response to the cell nucleus contents and use as biomarkers of systemic autoimmune diseases. Inflammation, apoptosis and necrosis of the cells are consequences that accompany breast cancer against which autoantibodies will be produced. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the presence of ANAs and anti-extractable nuclear antigens (anti-ENAs) in breast cancer. A total of 33 luminal A and luminal B breast cancer patients were assessed for presence of ANAs and anti-ENAs. All the patients had received hormone therapy at least for 6 months before the tests. Patients were screened to ANAs by indirect immunofluorescence on human epithelial type 2 (HEp-2) cells. AESKUBLOTS® ANA-17 comp kit was used to identify the concentrations of U1-snRNP, snRNP/Sm, SmD1, dsDNA, SS-A/Ro 60, SS-A/Ro 52, SS-B/La antibodies. Fifteen (45.5%) patients were luminal A and 18 (54.5%) patients were luminal B. The median of age was 57 and the median of tumor size was 25. 19 (57.6%) patients had grade I or II and 14 (42.4%) had grade III. 3 patients had ANAs test positive. All the patients who had positive ANA test were luminal A breast cancer and had grade I or II tumors and positive lymph node, whereas, pathological tumor stage were varied. No statistically significant association was found between ANAs positivity and molecular subtype, age, body mass index (BMI), grade, tumor stage or lymph node involvement. Moreover, there were negative correlations between the anti-U1-snRNP and anti-dsDNA with Ki-67 and a correlation between anti-snRNP/Sm and anti-SS-A/Ro 52 was found. Comparing with luminal A, anti-U1-snRNP and anti-snRNP/Sm concentrations were statistically significantly lower in luminal B tumors (p= 0.015 and 0.016 respectively). Patients who had high grade tumors showed low concentrations of anti-snRNP/Sm (p=0.027), whereas patients who had lymph node metastasis showed high concentrations of anti-U1-snRNP (p=0.031). ANAs positivity was more common in luminal A breast cancer patients compared with luminal B. Anti-U1-snRNP and anti-snRNP/Sm concentrations were lower in luminal B. Moreover, patients who had high grade tumors showed low concentrations of anti-snRNP/Sm, whereas those who had lymph node metastasis showed high concentrations of anti-U1-snRNP.

Successful demand management in diagnostic immunology testing

AimsWe investigated whether we could have a material and sustained impact on immunology test ordering by primary care clinicians by building evidence-based and explanatory algorithms into test ordering software.MethodsA service...

The Ratio of Peripheral Blood Natural Killer Cells is not a Solid Surrogate Immune Index in Unexplained Recurrent Miscarriage.

Immunotherapies targeting peripheral natural killer (pbNK) cells in unexplained recurrent miscarriage (uRM) remain controversial. We hypothesized that the change in pbNK cell count might be a result of innate immune responses rather than a cause. To explore whether the pbNK count is significantly different in women testing positive than those testing negative for commonly studied autoimmune markers. Peripheral blood samples were collected from 302 eligible patients with uRM for the antinuclear antibody (ANA) testing determined by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), anti-thyroid peroxidase antibody (TPO-Ab) testing and anti-thyroglobulin antibody (Tg-Ab) testing determined by the chemiluminescent immunoassay, and pbNK cell testing determined by flow cytometry. The patients were divided into two groups according to the pbNK normal range, and the comparative analysis entailed an examination of the prevalence rates of autoantibodies within the high pbNK group and the normal pbNK group, followed by a comprehensive investigation into the potential correlations between autoantibodies and pbNK cells. There was a positive association between TPO-Ab positivity and high pbNK cells (p=0.016, OR=5.097, 95% CI 1.356-19.159), while there was a negative association between ANA positivity and high pbNK cells (p=0.013, OR=0.293, 95% CI 0.111-0.773). TPO-Ab-positive patients had a higher pbNK cell count compared with TPO-Ab-negative patients, while ANA-positive patients had a lower pbNK cell count compared with ANA-negative patients. The change in pbNK cell count may be a consequence of immune responses, and there should be careful consideration in applying it as an immunotherapeutic index.

Clinical significance and prognostic value of serum autoantibody tests in multiple sclerosis.

It is known that multiple sclerosis (MS) often coexists with other autoimmune diseases. Hence, autoantibody (auto-Ab) tests may prove useful in the differential diagnosis of MS. The objectives of this study were to: (a) investigate the prevalence of auto-Ab positivity at the beginning of the MS diagnostic process; (b) assess whether Auto-Ab+ and Auto-Ab- patients differ in baseline clinical, laboratory, and radiological parameters; and (c) investigate the prognostic value during a two-year follow-up period. This retrospective study consisted of 450 patients aged between 18 and 55 years. All patients underwent a wide range of auto-Ab tests, anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) tests in particular. The expanded disability status scale (EDSS) scores of the patients were recorded at the time of diagnosis and at the end of a two-year follow-up period. The mean age of the 212 patients, 148 (69.8%) female and 64 (30.2%) male, included in the study sample was 37 ± 10.83 years. The rate of relapsing cases was 84% (178). Oligoclonal band (OCB) was positive in 142 (86.6%) of the 164 tested cases. At least one of the auto-Ab tests was positive in 51 (24.1%) of the cases. ANA test was positive in 21 (9.9%) cases. There was no significant difference between patients with at least one positive auto-Ab test and without any positive auto-Ab test and between ANA-positive and ANA-negative patients in terms of age, gender, clinical features of MS, presence of brain stem lesion, presence of spinal lesion, OCB positivity, level of clinical improvement after the first pulse steroid treatment, family history, presence of comorbidity, presence of autoimmune disease, or EDSS scores recorded at the end of the two-year follow-up period (p > 0.05). Our study findings revealed that Auto-Ab positivity was more common in MS patients than in the general population. However, given their limited contribution to the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of MS with no effect on the prognostic process, auto-Ab tests should be requested only in the event of accompanying autoimmune disease symptoms, and in cases where the diagnosis of MS may be suspected.

Excellent response to treatment with hydroxychloroquine in pediatric patients with SLE-related immune thrombocytopenia.

Pediatric immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) may precede systemic autoimmune disorders. In adolescent patients with ITP, routine screening for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) may be performed by testing for antinuclear antibody (ANA) titer. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is a safe and effective immunomodulatory drug in patients with SLE but rarely used in ITP. We analyzed the platelet count response and safety of HCQ in treating pediatric patients with SLE-related ITP. A retrospective study including pediatric patients with ITP and definite or incomplete SLE, who were treated with HCQ during 2010-2021. SLE was defined by ANA titer≥1:160 as measured by immunofluorescence and ≥10 points according to the 2019 EULAR/ACR 2019 classification criteria, while patients with incomplete SLE achieved a score<10. Complete response (CR) of the platelet count was defined as platelet count>100 × 109/L; partial response (PR) as platelet count 30-100 × 109/L and exceeding≥twice baseline counts. Of the 17 patients included (median age 15.5 years; IQR 3.6), 15 (88.2%) were female, 13 had definite SLE, and four had incomplete SLE. HCQ was initiated at a median of 17 months after ITP diagnosis with a median platelet count of 38 × 109/L (IQR 28). At 8weeks, 8 (47.1%) patients responded, including 6 (35.3%) achieving CR. After one year, the overall response was 82.4%, with the remaining patients having stable platelet counts requiring no additional ITP therapy. The response was maintained at a median follow-up of 42 months. No adverse effects to HCQ were noted. Pediatric patients with SLE-related ITP may benefit from treatment with HCQ.

Comprehensive Exploration of Antinuclear Antibodies (ANAs): Unveiling Clinical Significance, Associations with Cancer, and the Nuances of Differential Diagnosis in Positive ANA Patients

This comprehensive review delves into the complex realm of antinuclear antibodies (ANAs), expanding beyond their traditional involvement in autoimmune rheumatic disorders. By digging into historical changes, diagnostic complexity, and clinical significance, the debate reveals the shifting relationships between ANAs, particularly with cancer. Specialized studies provide practical insights on ANA testing processes, standardization, and upcoming challenges. Examining prevalence trends in the United States provides a time dimension to ANA dynamics, linking autoimmune and oncological considerations. The debate delves into the complexity of lupus erythematosus, emphasizing ANAs’ diverse presentations and their potential as flexible diagnostic and prognostic indicators. The complex relationship between ANAs and cancer is highlighted, demonstrating their potential as early markers or indicators of malignancies. Looking ahead, this synthesis anticipates advances in personalized medicine and collaborative research, putting ANAs at the forefront of advanced diagnostics and treatments for autoimmune disorders and cancer. This synthesis envisions a future for ANA research in which these antibodies play a critical role in promoting personalized treatment, enhancing diagnostics, and fostering collaborative initiatives that cross traditional boundaries. As ANAs grow more prominent at the junction of autoimmune illnesses and cancer, this synthesis lays the path for further research and novel advances in understanding, diagnosing, and treating complicated medical conditions.

Lupus Nephritis: A Literature Review

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has diverse clinical presentations, including lupus nephritis (LN), if LN manifest the mortality &amp; morbidity will be elevated. The majority of SLE cases found in females, especially during puberty and childbearing age. A comprehensive understanding of the epidemiology, classification, diagnosis, and management of LN is essential for medical practitioners. Initially, the diagnostic process requires clinical examinations to find clinical manifestations. This process then followed by laboratory assessments to diagnose SLE and identify any indication related to kidney damage, commonly proteinuria. Other findings such as haematuria and leukocyturia may also present. Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) test and anti-dsDNA serves as primary diagnostic tool. In addition, kidney biopsy is the gold standard for LN due to its ability to confirm and measure the stadium for treatment guide. The therapy is specifically based on clinical and biopsy findings, categorized by World Health Organization (WHO) into five classes, namely normal, mesangial, focal and segmental proliferative, diffuse proliferative, and membranous. Accurate diagnosis in the initial stage and suitable therapy is crucial to significantly improve the prognosis of LN. In this review, we address some clinical manifestations related to LN and standardised diagnostic assessment tools, with an ultimate goal to improve the outcome of patients with lupus through an individual-specific management.

Ulnar Nerve Palsy as the Initial Presentation of Small Vessel Vasculitis With a Negative Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody Level

Small-vessel vasculitis is a rare disease entity that affects the arteries, arterioles, capillaries, and venules of the circulatory system. Small vessel vasculitis can cause severe small vessel inflammation and multisystem involvement. The respiratory tract and kidneys are the most commonly affected organs, and occasionally neurological manifestations can occur. But neurological manifestation as the initial presentation without other system involvement is very rare. We report a case of a 16-year-old previously well female patient presenting with right lower limb distal muscle weakness associated with malaise, lethargy, and multiple joint pains for 2 weeks. On examination, she had palpable purpura below the knees with right sided ulnar nerve palsy. Her antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody and antinuclear antibody testing was negative. A skin biopsy showed vasculitis involving small vessels. She was started on Prednisolone 60mg daily, followed by Mycophenolate Mofetil 500mg twice daily, and physiotherapy. She had a good clinical response to treatment over time.

Frequency of Repeating Antinuclear Antibody Testing: When Less Is More.

Objectives Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) are autoantibodies that are associated with and ordered to diagnose autoimmune connective tissue disease. ANA have high sensitivity (~98%) but low specificity (~75%), and because they can be found in healthy individuals and non-rheumatologic conditions leading to their elevation, ANA tests are often requested and interpreted inappropriately by clinicians. The aim of this study was to retrospectively assess how frequently ANA testing is repeated in the adult population of Saudi Arabia (SA) and which factors are associated with and lead to inappropriate testing. Methodology We investigated a study group of 40,634 adult patients who underwent 229,825 ANA tests from 2018 to 2022 in an academic hospital in Jeddah, SA. We took a random sample of 500 patients from the study group, along with their 998 ANA tests, to look in depth into our research questions. Variables related to patients, ANA tests, and ordering physicians were collected.Descriptive and analytical statistics were employedto address the research questions,and a p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results We found 57% of the ordered ANA tests to have positive results, with the most common titers of mild positivity being 1:80 and 1:160. Most repeated ANA tests were ordered with an interval of more than one year, and when repeated, 67% of test results remained unchanged. The majority of seroconversions resulted from negative ANA tests or those with weak (titer 1:40) or mild positivity (titer 1:80-1:160). The results of the moderate (titer 1:320-1:640) and strong (titer ≥1280) positivity ANA tests did not change. Only 11% of repeated ANA tests were found to be appropriate for repetition. The most common specialties associated with ordering ANA tests in general were internal medicine, followed by rheumatology, and finally family medicine. Our correlation analysis revealed that being female, having systemic connective tissue disease, and having a rheumatologist as a specialist were all associated with ordering more than 10 ANA tests (p < 0.05). Conclusion Because the results of repeated ANA tests did not change much, our study suggests that the cost ofrepeating ANA tests and the subsequent potentially unnecessary interventions should all be carefully examined before scheduling a repeated ANA test. Further studies involving patients from SA and across wider healthcare settings (academic, community, and private hospitals and healthcare centers) are warranted.

Methodological aspects of anti-nuclear antibodies detection: EFLM, EASI, ICAP AND RAMLD recommendations

This is a review of international and Russian recommendation for the study of anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) in autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIRD) and autoimmune liver diseases (ALD), including a description of the most important methodological aspects. The main purpose of laboratory diagnostics of AIRD and ALD is to obtain objective information about the presence and immunopathological changes, which is an important tool for early diagnosis, assessment of activity, severity, prognosis of the disease and the effectiveness of therapy. The positive results of ANA determination are the main laboratory markers of AIRD and ALD, being among the diagnostic criteria for diseases. The ‘gold standard’ and primary screening method for determining ANA in serum is the indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA). Antigen-specific solid phase assays methods are used as confirmatory tests. Standardization of the ANA determination contributes for reducing the intra- and inter-laboratory variability of the results, helps to optimize the interaction between laboratory specialists and clinicians in matters of prescribing and clinical interpretation of ANA tests. Solving the problem of ANA detection standardization is important because of the growing number of laboratories performing these tests and an increased referring for this investigation from rheumatologists and another medical specialist.