Antihyperalgesic Effect Of Morphine Research Articles

Effect of Umbelliprenin on Antinociceptive Activity of Morphine in a Rat Model of Neuropathic Pain Induced by Chronic Constriction Injury of the Sciatic Nerve

Objective: Although morphine is among of the first line medicines for treatment of neuropathic pain, evidence has shown that the morphine efficacy gradually decreases and a tolerance can occur. Rregarding the many reports concerning the antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory properties of umbelliprenin (UMB), this study aimed to investigate the effect of UMB on antinociceptive activity of morphine in a rat model of neuropathic pain induced by chronic constriction injury (CCI) of the sciatic nerve. Methods: Twenty-four male Wistar rats were randomly divided into sham, CCI and CCI + UMB100 (100 μg UMB per rat) groups. UMB was intrathecally administered once daily for four consecutive days (from the day before surgery until day 2 after surgery). All the animals received a single dose of morphine (5 mg/kg, s.c.) on day 14. To evaluate the effect of UMB on antinociceptive activity of morphine, allodynia and hyperalgesia were measured using the von-Frey and hot plate tests, before and 30 min after morphine injection and the Percentage of Maximum Possible Effect (%MPE) was calculated. Besides, the expression and concentration of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), as a proinflammatory cytokine, was measured in the spinal cord using quantitative real-time PCR (RTPCR) and ELISA, respectively. Results: UMB significantly enhanced anti-allodynic and anti-hyperalgesic effects of morphine in the neuropathic animals. Moreover, UMB considerably downregulated TNF-α expression in the spinal cord of the animals. Conclusion: UMB can enhance the antinociceptive effects of morphine, and this action may be partially due to its anti-inflammatory property.

Haloperidol potentiates antinociceptive effects of morphine and disrupt opioid tolerance

Haloperidol is an antipsychotic agent recently described as an antinociceptive drug able to mediate the antagonism of sigma-1 receptors while morphine is an opioid used in the treatment of neuropathic pain. The objectives of this work were to determine the type of interaction generated by the combination of morphine and haloperidol in neuropathic pain induced by chronic constriction injury and to evaluate morphine tolerance and side effects. The antiallodynic and anti-hyperalgesic effects of morphine (0.01–3.16 mg/kg, s.c.) and haloperidol (0.0178–0.1778 mg/kg, s.c.) were determined after single-doses, in monotherapy and combined, using the acetone and von Frey tests, respectively. Evaluations were performed until 10-days postsurgery. Data were processed using “Surface of Synergic Interaction analysis”. The rotarod test was used to evaluate motor coordination, and the constipation test was performed using 5% charcoal. The effects of haloperidol and BD-1063, sigma-1 receptor antagonists, naloxone and PRE-084 (sigma-1 agonist) were determined using the morphine-tolerance model. Morphine (0.0316 mg/kg)+haloperidol (0.0178 mg/kg) was determined to be the optimal combination. Morphine-tolerance was observed on day 5 after 11 administrations, although in animals that received the combination, tolerance was delayed until day 8. PRE-084 and naloxone administered on day 5 in animals treated with the combination resulted in a blockade of its antiallodynic effects. Adverse effects of constipation or motor incoordination were not shown in animals treated with morphine + haloperidol. In conclusion, haloperidol enhances the antinociceptive effects of morphine without significant adverse effects, as it is able to disrupt or delay the morphine-tolerance in neuropathic pain.

Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Modelling of the Analgesic and Antihyperalgesic Effects of Morphine after Intravenous Infusion in Human Volunteers

Using a modelling approach, this study aimed to (i) examine whether the pharmacodynamics of the analgesic and antihyperalgesic effects of morphine differ; (ii) investigate the influence of demographic, pain sensitivity and genetic (OPRM1) variables on between-subject variability of morphine pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in human experimental pain models. The study was a randomized, double-blind, 5-arm, cross-over, placebo-controlled study. The psychophysical cutaneous pain tests, electrical pain tolerance (EPTo) and secondary hyperalgesia areas (2HA) were studied in 28 healthy individuals (15 males). The subjects were chosen based on a previous trial where 100 subjects rated (VAS) their pain during a heat injury (47°C, 7 min., 12.5 cm(2) ). The 33% lowest- and highest pain-sensitive subjects were offered participation in the present study. A two-compartment linear model with allometric scaling for weight provided the best description of the plasma concentration-time profile of morphine. Changes in the EPTo and 2HA responses with time during the placebo treatment were best described by a linear model and a quadratic model, respectively. The model discrimination process showed clear evidence for adding between-occasion variability (BOV) on baseline and the placebo slope for EPTo and 2HA, respectively. The sensitivity covariate was significant on baseline EPTo values and genetics as a covariate on the placebo slope for 2HA. The analgesic and antihyperalgesic effects of morphine were pharmacologically distinct as the models had different effect site equilibration half-lives and different covariate effects. Morphine had negligible effect on 2HA, but significant effect on EPTo.

Minocycline influences the anti-inflammatory interleukins and enhances the effectiveness of morphine under mice diabetic neuropathy

A single streptozotocin (STZ) injection in mice can induce significant neuropathic pain along with an increase in plasma glucose levels and a decrease in body weight. Seven days after the administration of STZ, an upregulation of C1q-positive cells was observed. Additionally, interleukins (IL-1beta, IL-3, IL-4, IL-6, IL-9, IL12p70, IL-17); proteins of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) family, e.g., IFNgamma and sTNF RII, were upregulated. Chronic administration of minocycline increases antinociceptive factors (IL-1alpha, IL-2, IL-10, sTNFRII) in diabetic mice. Minocycline also reduces the occurrence of neuropathic pain and significantly potentiates the antiallodynic and antihyperalgesic effects of morphine.

Effects of treatment with a carbon monoxide-releasing molecule and a heme oxygenase 1 inducer in the antinociceptive effects of morphine in different models of acute and chronic pain in mice

Treatment with a carbon monoxide-releasing molecule (tricarbonyldichlororuthenium(II) dimer, CORM-2) or a classical heme oxygenase 1 inducer (cobalt protoporphyrin IX, CoPP) has potent anti-inflammatory effects, but the role played by these treatments in the antinociceptive effects of morphine during acute and chronic pain was not evaluated. In wild type (WT), neuronal (NOS1-KO), or inducible (NOS2-KO) nitric oxide synthases knockout mice, we evaluated the effects of CORM-2 and CoPP treatments in the antinociceptive actions of morphine and their interaction with nitric oxide during acute, visceral, and chronic inflammatory or neuropathic pain. Acute and visceral pain was assessed through formalin and acid acetic writhing tests. Chronic inflammatory pain induced by the intra-articular administration of complete Freund's adjuvant and neuropathic pain by partial ligation of sciatic nerve were evaluated by measuring allodynia and hyperalgesia using the von Frey filaments, plantar, or cold plate tests. While nitric oxide, synthetized by NOS1 and/or NOS2, increased the local antinociceptive effects of morphine during acute and chronic pain, it decreased the inhibitory effects of morphine after visceral pain. Moreover, while CORM-2 or CoPP treatments did not alter or reduced the antinociceptive effects of morphine during acute and visceral pain, both treatments improved the local antiallodynic and antihyperalgesic effects of morphine after chronic inflammatory or neuropathic pain in WT, but not in KO mice. CORM-2 and CoPP treatments improved the local antinociceptive effects of morphine during chronic inflammatory and neuropathic pain by interaction with nitric oxide synthetized by NOS1 and NOS2 isoforms.

Interaction of Morphine and Selective Serotonin Receptor Inhibitors in Rats Experiencing Inflammatory Pain

Citalopram and paroxetine are selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and also have antinociceptive effects. We investigated the antiallodynic and antihyperalgesic effects of intrathecally administered morphine, citalopram, paroxetine, and combinations thereof, in a rat model in which peripheral inflammation was induced by complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA). Drugs were intrathecally administered via direct lumbar puncture. Mechanical allodynia was measured using a Dynamic Plantar Aesthesiometer. Thermal hyperalgesia and cold allodynia were determined by measuring latency of paw withdrawal in response to radiant heat and cold water. Behavioral tests were run before and 15, 30, 45, and 60 min after intrathecal injection. Intraplantar injection of CFA produced mechanical allodynia, thermal hyperalgesia, and cold allodynia. Intrathecally administered morphine (0.3 or 1 µg) had antiallodynic or antihyperalgesic effects (24.0%-71.9% elevation). The effects of morphine were significantly increased when a combination of citalopram (100 µg) and paroxetine (100 µg) was added (35.2%-95.1% elevation). This rise was reversed by naloxone and methysergide. The effects of citalopram and paroxetine were also reversed by naloxone and methysergide. We suggest that the mu opioid receptor and serotonin receptors play major roles in production of the antiallodynic and antihyperalgesic effects of morphine, citalopram, paroxetine, and combinations thereof, in animals experiencing inflammatory pain.

Characterization of Pain, Vasculature and Innervation in Sickle Cell Disease.

Pain in sickle cell disease (SCD) is characterized by chronic vasculopathy. Characterization of pain and vasculature may be critical to improve the analgesic ability of opioids in treating pain in SCD. Therefore, we examined the association between vasculature, innervation and pain in a transgenic mouse model of SCD (BERK) and control mice (HbABERK). Pain behavior was analyzed using paw withdrawal latencies (PWL) using Hargreave's device for thermal hyperalgesia. A radiant heat stimulus was applied to the plantar surface of each hind paw from underneath the glass floor with a projector lamp bulb (CXL/CXR, 8 V, 50 W). PWL to the nearest 0.1 s was automatically recorded upon paw withdrawal. Paws were alternated randomly to preclude “order” effects. We observed that 5 mo old sickle mice showed significantly lower thresholds to noxious heat than controls (p=0.002 for females; and p=0.04 for males; n=5–7 and 15 observations/mouse). Females showed a significantly shorter latency than their respective males (control, p=0.03 and sickle, p=0.01), i.e., they were more sensitive to thermal stimuli. No significant difference was observed between sickle and control nor male and female mice (p > 0.05, n = 5–7) for mechanical allodynia using von Frey filaments, suggesting that sickle mice show increased sensitivity to thermal hyperalgesia. BERK mice were subcutaneously injected with 0.7 mg morphine/Kg mice/day (equivalent to 50 mg/70 kg /day/ human adult) with an added increment of 0.14 mg/day/Kg for each week for three different time periods; Group I, treated for 6 weeks, Group II treated for 6 weeks followed by withdrawal for 6 weeks and Group III treated for 12 weeks. Morphine treatment for 6 weeks as well as 12 weeks resulted in a ∼50–75% increase in PWL vs PBS, suggesting that chronic morphine treatment decreased hyperalgesia in sickle mice. The anti-hyperalgesic effect of morphine was antagonized by simultaneous co-administration of naloxone (2 mcg/Kg/day), suggesting an opioid receptor mediated effect. Naloxone treatment alone did not show any significant effect on PWL. In Group II, withdrawal of morphine for 6 weeks following 6 wks of treatment showed about 35% increase in PWL vs PBS (p<0.005), suggesting that the anti-hyperalgesic effect of morphine continues after its withdrawal. The continued anti-hyperalgesic effect of morphine following withdrawal could be secondary to its vasoregulatory effect. Indeed, confocal microscopy of skin sections revealed disorganized and stringy blood vessels, nerves and lymphatics in sickle mice vs. control. Deep blood vessels and nerve plexus, as well as the skin, were appreciably thicker in controls vs sickle. The diameter of lymphatics and densities of both blood vessels and nerves were significantly lower in sickle vs HbA controls (p= 0.0001 and 0.002, for sub-epidermal and dermal blood vessels, respectively; p=0.04 for lymphatic diameter; p=0.0001 for sub-epidermal, dermal and deep dermal nerve fibers). Functionally, we observed about 30% decrease in subcutaneous O2 measured by Laser Doppler (in real-time) in BERK vs HbA control (p<0.05). Thus, complementary alteration in vasculature and innervation may underlie the chronic pain in SCD. Given that morphine promotes angiogenesis and vasodilation, its prolonged anti-hyperalgesic activity could be due to its vasoregulatory function. Together, these data suggest that intermittent therapy with morphine in SCD may provide analgesia similar to continued therapy and may even be devoid of side-effects.

Changes in morphine analgesia and side effects during daily subcutaneous administration in healthy volunteers

Tolerance to the anti-nociceptive effects of opioids develops rapidly in animals. In contrast, humans with chronic pain show little or no loss of pain relief in prospective opioid trials of 4–8 weeks duration. Employing the Brief Thermal Sensitization model to induce transient cutaneous secondary hyperalgesia, we tested the hypothesis that opioid analgesic tolerance would develop rapidly. In this outpatient randomized placebo-controlled study, subjects in the MMMMP group received two injections of subcutaneous morphine 6 mg (150 min apart) on Monday–Thursday (total 48 mg over 4 days) and matching saline placebo on Friday. Subjects in the PPPPM group received placebo on Monday–Thursday and morphine (total 12 mg) on Friday. Sixty-one healthy volunteers were enrolled; morphine side effects accounted for all nine non-completions. Compared to the first placebo day, the reduction in the area of secondary hyperalgesia on the first morphine day was significant and robust in both groups. Morphine suppression of the painfulness of skin heating and elevation of the heat pain detection threshold were also significant. During 4 days of twice-daily injections, the decline in anti-hyperalgesic effects of morphine did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.06) compared to placebo. Morphine side effects did not correlate with anti-hyperalgesic effects and withdrawal symptoms did not emerge. As 4 days is the threshold for demonstrating analgesic tolerance to twice-daily morphine in animal models, a longer period of opioid exposure in healthy volunteers might be needed to detect analgesic tolerance.

Minocycline and pentoxifylline attenuate allodynia and hyperalgesia and potentiate the effects of morphine in rat and mouse models of neuropathic pain

Recent research has shown that microglial cells which are strongly activated in neuropathy can influence development of allodynia and hyperalgesia. Here we demonstrated that preemptive and repeated i.p., administration (16 h and 1 h before injury and then after nerve ligation twice daily for 7 days) of minocycline (15; 30; 50 mg/kg), a potent inhibitor of microglial activation, significantly attenuated the allodynia (von Frey test) and hyperalgesia (cold plate test) measured on day 3, 5, 7 after chronic constriction injury (CCI) in rats. Moreover, the 40% improvement of motor function was observed. In mice, i.p., administration of minocycline (30 mg/kg) or pentoxifylline (20 mg/kg) according to the same schedule also significantly decreased allodynia and hyperalgesia on day 7 after CCI. Antiallodynic and antihyperalgesic effect of morphine (10 mg/kg; i.p.) was significantly potentiated in groups preemptively and repeatedly injected with minocycline (von Frey test, 18 g versus 22 g; cold plate test, 13 s versus 20 s in rats and 1.2 g versus 2.2 g; 7.5 s versus 10 s in mice; respectively) or pentoxifylline (1.3 g versus 3 g; 7.6 s versus 15 s in mice; respectively). Antiallodynic and antihyperalgesic effect of morphine (30 μg; i.t.) given by lumbar puncture in mice was also significantly potentiated in minocycline-treated group (1.2 g versus 2.2 g; 7.5 s versus 11 s; respectively). These findings indicate that preemptive and repeated administration of glial inhibitors suppresses development of allodynia and hyperalgesia and potentiates effects of morphine in rat and mouse models of neuropathic pain.

INTERACTIONS BETWEEN METOCLOPRAMIDE AND MORPHINE: ENHANCED ANTINOCICEPTION AND MOTOR DYSFUNCTION IN RATS

1. Opioid analgesics and anti-emetics are often used concomitantly to treat pain and nausea and vomiting in people with malignant disease. We investigated interactions between the opioid analgesic morphine and the anti-emetic metoclopramide, a dopamine D2 receptor antagonist, on nociception and gross motor function. 2. To assess for antinociceptive interactions, 11 Sprague-Dawley rats were injected intraperitoneally with morphine (5.0 mg/kg) or saline in combination with metoclopramide (0.5, 1.5 and 5.0 mg/kg) or saline and, 30 min later, the tail-flick latencies to a noxious thermal stimulus (49 degrees C water) were measured. Immediately thereafter we induced reperfusion hyperalgesia in the rats' tails using a tourniquet cuff and tested nociception again. Because, in addition to its ability to block D2 receptors, metoclopramide is also a weak 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist, we assessed in a further 11 rats whether any antinociceptive interactions occurred between morphine (5.0 mg/kg) and ondansetron (0.2 and 2.0 mg/kg), an anti-emetic that selectively antagonizes 5-HT(3) receptors. To assess for motor interactions, we injected another group of nine rats with morphine (5.0 mg/kg) or saline in combination with metoclopramide (0.5 and 5.0 mg/kg) or saline and tested the ability of the animals to run on an 80 mm diameter rod rotating at 25 r.p.m. for 30 min. 3. Metoclopramide was not inherently analgesic or antihyperalgesic, but the highest dose of metoclopramide (5.0 mg/kg) enhanced the analgesic and antihyperalgesic effects of morphine. Neither dose of ondansetron was analgesic or antihyperalgesic or enhanced the antinociceptive actions of morphine. 4. Only the high dose of metoclopramide compromised running performance when administered with saline. However, coadministering morphine with metoclopramide (both doses) decreased motor performance. 5. Therefore, metoclopramide, possibly through its actions on D2 receptors and not 5-HT(3) receptors, enhances the analgesic and antihyperalgesic effects of morphine, but morphine exacerbates metoclopramide-induced motor dysfunction in rats.

Long-Term Changes in the Antinociceptive Potency of Morphine or Dexmedetomidine After a Single Treatment

Acute tolerance develops after a single administration of opiate or alpha(2)-adrenergic agonists, but the characteristics of the delayed type of acute tolerance have not been analyzed in acute and inflammatory thermal pain tests. We investigated the long-term changes in the antinociceptive potency of morphine (10 mg/kg) injected intraperitoneally and the alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonist dexmedetomidine (150 microg/kg intraperitoneally) on acute heat pain (tail-flick test) sensitivity and on carrageenan-induced inflammatory thermal hyperalgesia (paw withdrawal test) after a second injection 7 days later. The first treatment did not influence the baseline values on Day 8 in either test. In the tail-flick test, the antinociceptive potency of morphine, but not that of dexmedetomidine, was significantly decreased after repeated administration, suggesting a delayed type of acute tolerance to morphine. In contrast, the antihyperalgesic effect of morphine in the paw withdrawal test did not change after repeated injection, whereas the potency of dexmedetomidine was increased on Day 8. There were significant differences between the inflamed and noninflamed sides on Day 1 but not on Day 8, revealing an increased potency of the drugs on the inflamed side. There was no sign of cross-tolerance between the two drugs in either pain test. These data indicate long-term changes in the antinociceptive potency of morphine or dexmedetomidine after single treatment in different heat pain tests.

MULTIDISCIPLINARY PAIN ABSTRACTS: 15 . Basic Science (15)

The purpose of this investigation was to use a capsaicin model of tonic pain to evaluate sex differences in hyperalgesia and μ‐opioid‐induced antihyperalgesia in Fischer 344 (F344) rats. Capsaicin injected into the tail produced a dose‐dependent thermal hyperalgesia in males and females, with the dose required to produce a comparable level of hyperalgesia being three‐fold higher in males than in females. These sex differences were modulated by gonadal hormones, inasmuch as gonadectomy increased the potency of capsaicin in males and decreased its potency in females. Morphine, buprenorphine, and dezocine administered by various routes (systemic [s.c.], local [in the tail], and central [i.c.v.]) generally produced marked antihyperalgesic effects in males and females. Although in most instances these opioids were equally potent and effective in males and females, selected doses of local and i.c.v. administered buprenorphine produced greater effects in females. When administered locally, the antihyperalgesic effects of morphine were mediated by peripheral opioid receptors in both males and females, since this effect was not reversed by i.c.v. naloxone methiodide. These data contrast with the finding that μ‐opioids are more potent in male rodents in assays of phasic pain, thus suggesting that distinct mechanisms underlie male and female sensitivity to opioid antinociception in phasic and tonic pain models. These findings emphasize the need to test male and female rodents in tonic pain assays that may have greater relevance for human pain conditions.

Capsaicin-induced hyperalgesia and mu-opioid-induced antihyperalgesia in male and female Fischer 344 rats.

The influence of sex in determining responses to opioid analgesics has been well established in rodents and monkeys in assays of short-lasting, phasic pain. The purpose of this investigation was to use a capsaicin model of tonic pain to evaluate sex differences in hyperalgesia and mu-opioid-induced antihyperalgesia in Fischer 344 (F344) rats. Capsaicin injected into the tail produced a dose-dependent thermal hyperalgesia in males and females, with the dose required to produce a comparable level of hyperalgesia being 3.0-fold higher in males than in females. These sex differences were modulated by gonadal hormones, inasmuch as gonadectomy increased the potency of capsaicin in males and decreased its potency in females. Morphine, buprenorphine, and dezocine administered by various routes [systemic (s.c.), local (in the tail), and central (i.c.v.)] generally produced marked antihyperalgesic effects in males and females. Although in most instances these opioids were equally potent and effective in males and females, selected doses of local and i.c.v. administered buprenorphine produced greater effects in females. When administered locally, the antihyperalgesic effects of morphine were mediated by peripheral opioid receptors in both males and females, since this effect was not reversed by i.c.v. naloxone methiodide. These data contrast with the finding that mu-opioids are more potent in male rodents in assays of phasic pain, thus suggesting that distinct mechanisms underlie male and female sensitivity to opioid antinociception in phasic and tonic pain models. These findings emphasize the need to test male and female rodents in tonic pain assays that may have greater relevance for human pain conditions.