I thank the discusser (L.R. Fyffe). His comments illustrate an approach to Avalonian stratigraphy that has had important consequences for understanding the history of the cover sequences deposited on the Late Proterozoic Avalonian orogen. In particular, this approach has led to local stratigraphic nomenclatures that are arbitrarily limited by political boundaries, obscure the lateral continuity of formationand member-level units and bounding surfaces, and confound an understanding of Avalonian epeirogeny . The reason for these problems is that lithostratigraphic units were not considered to extend beyond single provinces, states, or even counties (as in Massachusetts). I refer the discusser to an areally more comprehensive study of Avalonian stratigraphy (Landing 1996a), which demonstrates that most uppermost Precambrian lower Ordovician units extend on the Avalonian marginal and inner platforms from Rhode Island to England. Condensed limestone intervals, macroscale shoaling cycles, and genetically related unconformities (i .e., sequence boundaries) and onlap deposits can be traced for over 2500 km. Landing (1996a) showed how a unified nomenclature for the Avalonian lower Paleozoic developed, with recognition of lithostratigraphic synonymies in the Avalon and Burin peninsulas, east Newfoundland, and later comparison with the sequences of Cape Breton Island, the northern Antigonish Highlands of mainland Nova Scotia, and east Massachusetts. New Brunswick was not included in this detailed synthesis until now. Standard procedures of the North American Stratigraphic Code (North American Commission on Stratigraphic Nomenclature, 1983) were followed to develop a unified stratigraphic nomenclature in Landing (1996a) in the paper under discussion. This has allowed establishment of appropriate formation and group names for lithostratigraphic units on the basis of shared lithic characteristics, stratigraphic position, and genetically related upper and lower boundaries. These features allow the demonstration of synonymy for identical lithosomes that had earlier received different names in separate geographic areas. Biostratigraphy serves to test lateral continuity of rock bodies, but is only part of the synthesis. Abandonment of local stratigraphic names (such as Glen Falls based on synonymy of its lower part with the Random Formation, lateral continuity of its upper part