PurposeGlioblastoma (GBM) recurrence poses challenges in radiotherapy treatment planning as reirradiation has limited leeway needing for precise target delineation. Though effective radiotracers are emerging for treatment planning, comparisons of 11C-methionine positron emission tomography (MET-PET), 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen PET (PSMA-PET), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for contouring recurrent GBMs are lacking in the literature. This case study aims to highlight the differences and similarities in target contours delineated from three examinations, aiming to raise doubts about the adequacy of current radiotherapy planning practices. Methods and MaterialsA 37-year-old female patient with recurrent IDH1/2 wild-type GBM underwent MRI, MET-PET, and PSMA-PET scans. Target delineations were performed, and volumes were compared using the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), Conformity Index (CI), and Overlap Volume (OV), considering different planning target volume (PTV) margins. ResultsWe found that MET-PET and MRI volumes showed superior agreement compared to PSMA-PET across all similarity parameters, indicating a more marked discrepancy between PSMA-PET and other modalities. Increasing PTV margins demonstrated progressive convergence in inter-volume discrepancies. Notably, PSMA-PET delineated larger volumes extending beyond MRI-based volumes. ConclusionsThus, MRI alone may not suffice for target delineation in recurrent GBMs. PET imaging modalities offer complementary insights. Combined PET-MRI guidance could improve tumor boundary detection in target delineation for reirradiation. Prospective trials are necessary to ascertain its impact on patient outcomes.