Antifungal Prescribing Research Articles

How can we optimise antifungal use in a solid organ transplant centre? Local epidemiology and antifungal stewardship implementation: A single-centre study.

We aimed to implement and to assess the impact of the antifungal stewardship programme (AFSp) on prescription appropriateness of antifungals, management and outcomes of candidaemia patients, and antifungal consumption and costs at our solid organ transplant (SOT) institute. Local epidemiology of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) from 2009 to 2017 was analysed in order to prepare an effective AFSp, implemented in January 2018. It included suspension of empirical antifungal prescriptions after 72hours (antifungal time-out), automated alert and infectious disease (ID) consult for empirical prescriptions and for every patient with IFI, and indication for step-down to oral fluconazole when possible. We used process measures and results measures to assess the effects of the implemented programme. The ASFp led to significant improvements in selection of the appropriate antifungal (40.5% in pre-AFS vs 78.6% in post-AFS), correct dosing (51.2% vs 79.8%), correct length of treatment (55.9% vs 75%) and better management of patients with candidaemia. Analysis of prescribed empirical antifungal revealed that defined daily doses (DDDs) per 100 patient days decreased by 36.7% in 2018 compared to the average of pre-AFSp period, with important savings in costs. This AFSp led to a better use of antifungal drugs in terms of appropriateness and consumption, with stable clinical and microbiological outcomes in patients with IFI.

Superficial mycoses in Belgium: Burden, costs and antifungal drugs consumption

Monitoring of superficial mycoses requires more attention due to their important incidence, health costs and antifungal drugs consumption. The objectives were to estimate the burden of superficial mycoses in Belgium and to assess trends in associated antifungal consumption. The burden of dermatophytoses (including onychomycosis), as well as skin and genital candidiasis, was estimated using disability-adjusted life years (DALY). Moreover, trends in systemic and topical antifungal consumption in ambulatory care were examined for the period 2010-2017, together with their associated costs. Due to their high incidence and long treatment duration, dermatophytoses represented the bulk of the burden, accounting for 92.2% of the total DALYs of superficial mycoses. Terbinafine was the most prescribed antifungal in terms of doses (35.4% of the total doses) while fluconazole was the most delivered drug in terms of packages (29.1% of the total packages). More than 70% of the prescriptions were made by general practitioners while consumption varied according to age and gender of the patients. A global 12% decrease in antifungal prescriptions was observed between 2011 and 2017. However, this reduction would result mainly from packaging changes and increased self-medication. A significant decrease in itraconazole treatments was notably compensated by an increased prescription of fluconazole packages. This study emphasises that dermatological presentations of superficial mycoses are the most important in terms of both burden and antifungal consumption in Belgium. Further reduction in antifungals use can be achieved by applying the adequate treatment after identification of the causative agent.

Candida auris Isolates Resistant to Three Classes of Antifungal Medications - New York, 2019.

Candida auris is a globally emerging yeast that causes outbreaks in health care settings and is often resistant to one or more classes of antifungal medications (1). Cases of C. auris with resistance to all three classes of commonly prescribed antifungal drugs (pan-resistance) have been reported in multiple countries (1). C. auris has been identified in the United States since 2016; the largest number (427 of 911 [47%]) of confirmed clinical cases reported as of October 31, 2019, have been reported in New York, where C. auris was first detected in July 2016 (1,2). As of June 28, 2019, a total of 801 patients with C. auris were identified in New York, based on clinical cultures or swabs of skin or nares obtained to detect asymptomatic colonization (3). Among these patients, three were found to have pan-resistant C. auris that developed after receipt of antifungal medications, including echinocandins, a class of drugs that targets the fungal cell wall. All three patients had multiple comorbidities and no known recent domestic or foreign travel. Although extensive investigations failed to document transmission of pan-resistant isolates from the three patients to other patients or the environment, the emergence of pan-resistance is concerning. The occurrence of these cases underscores the public health importance of surveillance for C. auris, the need for prudent antifungal prescribing, and the importance of conducting susceptibility testing on all clinical isolates, including serial isolates from individual patients, especially those treated with echinocandin medications. This report summarizes investigations related to the three New York patients with pan-resistant infections and the subsequent actions conducted by the New York State Department of Health and hospital and long-term care facility partners.

Neonatal Antifungal Consumption Is Dominated by Prophylactic Use; Outcomes From The Pediatric Antifungal Stewardship: Optimizing Antifungal Prescription Study.

Diagnostic challenges combined with the vulnerability of neonates to develop invasive candidiasis (IC) may lead to antifungal administration in the absence of IC. A modified point-prevalence study was performed to obtain an improved insight and understanding of antifungal prescribing in this specific patient population. Neonates and infants ≤90 days of age receiving systemic antifungals from 12 centers in England were included. Data were collected prospectively during 26 consecutive weeks and entered into an online REDCap database. Two hundred eighty neonates and infants were included, the majority ≤1 month of age (68.2%). Prematurity was the commonest underlying condition (68.9%). Antifungals were prescribed for prophylactic reason in 79.6%; of those, 64.6% and 76.3% were extreme low birth weight infants and prematurely born neonates, respectively. Additional risk factors were present in almost all patients, but only 44.7% had ≥3 risk factors rendering them more susceptible to develop IC. Nonpremature and non extremely low birth weight premature infants only scored ≥3 risk factors in 32.6% and 15%, respectively. Fluconazole was the most common antifungal used (76.7% of all prescriptions), and commonly underdosed as treatment. The number of microbiologic proven IC was low, 5.4%. Neonatal antifungal prophylaxis is commonly prescribed outside the recommendations based on known risk profiles. Fluconazole is the main antifungal prescribed in neonates and infants, with underdosing frequently observed when prescribed for treatment. Number of proven IC was very low. These observations should be taken into consideration to develop a national pediatric Antifungal Stewardship program aiming to guide rational prescribing.

Hospital-wide antifungal prescription in Greek hospitals: a multicenter repeated point-prevalence study.

The aim of the study was to evaluate antifungal prescriptions among hospitalized adult patients in Greek hospitals. This multicenter two-times, 1-day, point-prevalence study was carried out in 2015 and 2017 in five and six hospitals, respectively. Among the 5812 patients screened in both periods, antifungals were prescribed in 129 patients (73 in 2015 and 56 in 2017); antifungals were used as prophylaxis in 31 patients (24%), pre-emptively in 32 (25%), empirically in 38 (30%), and as targeted therapy in 28 (22%). Triazoles were the class most commonly used (65 patients; 50%), followed by echinocandins (59; 46%) and liposomal amphotericin B (12; 9%). The use of echinocandins was higher (P 0.009) in the ICU (16 out of 22 patients), as compared with those in other departments (40%). Antifungal treatment was deemed inappropriate in 32/129 patients (25%) (16% in 2015 versus 36% in 2017; P 0.014). Inappropriate antifungal administration was more common if indicated by the primary physician, as compared with an infectious disease specialist (35% versus 5%; P < 0.001). Candidemia represented the majority of microbiologically documented infections (12 out of 28). Only two cases of proven pulmonary aspergillosis were diagnosed. Fluconazole and echinocandins were most frequently prescribed for identified or presumptive fungal infections, while fluconazole or posaconazole was given most frequently as prophylaxis. Antifungal treatment has been, ultimately, proven unnecessary in one-fourth of cases, underlining the need of a nationwide antifungal stewardship program.

1136. Antifungal Prescribing Patterns among Hospitalized Children in the United States: Are There Opportunities for Antifungal Stewardship?

BackgroundAntifungal stewardship may help reduce the toxicity, cost, and emergence of resistance related to inappropriate antifungal use. A better understanding of antifungal prescribing patterns, particularly in high-risk, high-utilization populations, is needed to guide appropriate stewardship interventions. We analyzed antifungal prescribing characteristics, including the indications for use and differences between oncology/bone marrow transplant (Onc/BMT) and non-Onc/BMT patients, using a multi-center national cohort of hospitalized children.MethodsWe analyzed antifungal prescribing data from 32 hospitals that participated in the SHARPS Antibiotic Resistance, Prescribing, and Efficacy among Children (SHARPEC) study, a point prevalence survey conducted quarterly between June 2016 and December 2017. We included inpatients <18 years of age with an active order for a systemic antifungal agent and evaluated the patient and antifungal characteristics. In the Onc/BMT group, we classified antifungal prescribing by indication and compared the proportion of antifungal prescriptions in each category based on antifungal class, route of administration, and use of combination therapy.ResultsSix percent (2,095/34,927) of patients received a total of 2,207 antifungal prescriptions. Fifty-eight percent (1,291/2,207) of antifungal prescriptions were for Onc/BMT patients. Among patients prescribed an antifungal, those with an Onc/BMT diagnosis were older, received broader-spectrum agents, and were more likely to receive combination therapy (Table 1). The majority of antifungal use in the Onc/BMT group was for prophylaxis, with significant variation in the rate and choice of prophylactic antifungal prescribing across hospitals (Figure 1). Combination antifungal use was common among Onc/BMT patients receiving targeted therapy (Table 2).ConclusionThe majority of antifungal use among hospitalized children is for patients with an Onc/BMT diagnosis and the patterns of antifungal utilization in this population appear to differ significantly from non-Onc/BMT patients. Based on the variation observed in this nationwide cohort, potential stewardship targets include the rate and type of antifungal prophylaxis and the use of combination therapy in Onc/BMT patients. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Effect of an intervention to improve the prescription of antifungals in pediatric hematology-oncology.

The use of antifungals has expanded in pediatric hematology-oncology, and the need to develop pediatric-based surveillance and education activities is becoming crucial. The aims of this study were to evaluate the impact of a multidisciplinary protocol on the adequacy of antifungal prescription in a pediatric hematology-oncology unit and to assess the effect of an educational intervention to improve the knowledge of prescribing pediatricians over time. A multidisciplinary team established a protocol for the management of invasive fungal disease (IFD). The use of antifungals before (January 2012-May 2013) and after the protocol (June 2013-December 2015) was evaluated. Prescribing pediatricians attended a training course on IFD and were evaluated before 0, 6, and 12 months after the intervention. During the study period, antifungal agents were used in 185 episodes (56 children, 39.3% females), and were administered as prophylaxis (58.9%), empiric (34.6%), or targeted therapy (6.5%). Antifungal prescriptions were inadequate in 7% of the episodes, related to drug selection (53.8%), dosage (38.5%) and route of administration (7.7%). After protocol implementation, inadequate prescriptions decreased 9.9% (15.2% vs 5.3%; P=.04). Following the educational activity, the percentage of adequate responses to the questionnaire improved significantly compared to baseline, and persisted over time (19.7% improvement at 0 months [P<.0001]; 21.1% at 6 months [P<.0001]; 16.6% at 12 months [P=.002]). The establishment of multidisciplinary protocols and education activities improved the quality of antifungal prescription and the knowledge of prescribers regarding antifungal therapy. Therefore, these activities may be important for the implementation of antifungal stewardship programs in pediatrics.

Antibiotic use and the risk of rheumatoid arthritis: a population-based case-control study

BackgroundAntibiotic-induced disturbances of the human microbiota have been implicated in the development of chronic autoimmune conditions. This study aimed to assess whether antibiotic use is associated with the onset of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).MethodsA nested case-control study was conducted utilising data from the primary care Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). Patients with an incident diagnosis of RA were identified (1995–2017). Each case was matched on age, gender, and general practice to ≥ 5 controls without RA. Conditional logistic regression was used to examine previous antibiotic prescriptions and RA onset after controlling for confounding factors.ResultsWe identified 22,677 cases of RA, matched to 90,013 controls, with a median follow-up of 10 years before RA diagnosis. The odds of developing RA were 60% higher in those exposed to antibiotics than in those not exposed (OR 1.60; 95% CI 1.51–1.68). A dose- or frequency-dependent association was observed between the number of previous antibiotic prescriptions and RA. All classes of antibiotics were associated with higher odds of RA, with bactericidal antibiotics carrying higher risk than bacteriostatic (45% vs. 31%). Those with antibiotic-treated upper respiratory tract (URT) infections were more likely to be RA cases. However, this was not observed for URT infections not treated with antibiotics. Antifungal (OR = 1.27; 95% CI 1.20–1.35) and antiviral (OR = 1.19; 95% CI 1.14–1.24) prescriptions were also associated with increased odds of RA.ConclusionAntibiotic prescriptions are associated with a higher risk of RA. This may be due to microbiota disturbances or underlying infections driving risk. Further research is needed to explore these mechanisms.

Inappropriate antifungal prescription and the need for antifungal stewardship programs

Invasive fungal disease (IFD) is a condition affecting immunosuppressed and critically ill patients. Recently there has been an increase in the amount of patients at risk for IFD, which implies an increase in the prescription of antifungal agents as prophylactic, pre-emptive or empiric therapy. Some studies evaluating appropriateness of antifungal prescription have shown that inappropriate formulations reach 72%, exposing patients to side effects, pharmacological interactions and rising costs. Some groups have recommended many interventions to control and make a rational use of antimicrobials, into strategies known as "antimicrobial stewardship", these interventions are useful also for antifungal agents and it has been named "antifungal stewardship". Here we present a narrative review of the scientific literature showing published articles about appropriate use of antifungal agents and the experience of some centers after implementing antifungal stewardship programs.

Use of Potassium Hydroxide (KOH) Test Reduces Antifungal Medication Prescription for Suspected Monilial Diaper Dermatitis in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Quality Improvement Project.

Despite availability of rapid fungal potassium hydroxide (KOH) tests, many care providers rely on visual assessment to determine the diagnosis of monilial diaper dermatitis (MDD). To determine whether a KOH test, when MDD is suspected, would result in more accurate diagnoses, with decreased antifungal medication prescription and exposure. Quality improvement project from 2016 through 2017 with protocol implemented in 2017 for treatment of MDD after positive KOH testing. If monilial rash suspected, after 2 negative KOH tests, then antifungal ordered (considered false negative). χ testing and cost determination were performed. Neonates in 2 level III neonatal intensive care units. KOH test results, use of antifungal medication, and cost. The patient census included 1051 and 1015 patients in the year before and after the protocol initiation. The medical orders for antifungal medication decreased from 143 to 36 (P < .001; 95% odds ratio confidence interval, 2.24-4.38). There was a 75% reduction in both use and cost, as charged, of antifungal agents. Overall charges, including KOH test costs, decreased by 12%. Three infants received multiple negative KOH tests, then a positive one. These met the definition of false-negative tests, per protocol. There were no cases of fungal sepsis. Use of a quality improvement protocol, in which the use of KOH testing is required, before antifungal agents are prescribed, results in decreased exposure and costs. To test the feasibility of bedside "point-of-care" KOH testing, and whether KOH testing and reduced antifungal medication use affects antimicrobial resistance or invasive fungal sepsis.

Assessing The Knowledge and Attitudes of Group of Practicing Dentists in Saudi Arabia with Regards to Antifungal Prescriptions for The Treatment of Oral Candidiasis: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Introduction: Candida albicans is the most prevalent causative species of oral fungal infections. This study was designed to assess the knowledge of dentists who are practicing in a dental university hospital regarding antifungal prescriptions for the treatment of oral candidiasis in a Riyadh city, SA.&#x0D; Material and Methods: A self-administered questionnaire were distributed among dentists of different specialties to assess their knowledge and attitudes toward antifungal prescription for the treatment of oral candidiasis. Statistical analysis was carried out to describe the properties of the sample in terms of frequencies and distribution while chi square test was used to compare the results between groups at level of significant P value ≤0.05 using the Statistical Packages for the Social Science (SPSS) Program.&#x0D; Results: A total of 130 completed questionnaires were received. Males contributed 55.4% compared to 44.6% female counterparts. Topical antifungals were preferred by 85.4% of the participants. Topical Nystatin and oral fluconazole were the chosen antifungal agents by the dentists for the treatment of local (55.4%) and systemic (58.4%) fungal infections respectively. The challenge that was faced by most respondents (46%) is the lack of knowledge about the recommended dosage to be prescribed. Also, a significant difference in the knowledge was detected between dentists of different specialties.&#x0D; Conclusion: Most dentists will start with topical antifungal agents, nystatin suspension is the first medication of choice follow by miconazole and for the systemic antifungal agents oral fluconazole is first medication of choice. As for the adjunctive therapy most participants prescribed 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash.

Improving quality of antifungal use through antifungal stewardship interventions.

In recent years antifungal stewardship (AFS) programmes have been increasingly recommended to provide optimal antifungal treatment. In a previous study (study I) in the department of haematology and oncology of a German tertiary care hospital we found areas for improvement concerning antifungal prescription. Subsequently, AFS measures were implemented and their impact on quality of antifungal use was assessed in this study. AFS measures included medical training (two sessions), a pocket card summarising main recommendations for antifungal use, and daily pharmaceutical counselling on the ward. In a 6-month observational study, antifungal prescriptions were analysed and compared to the previously collected data (study I) concerning indication, choice of drug, dosing, duration and drug-drug interactions. The study was approved by the university hospital ethical review board. Antifungal agents were prescribed for 103/1169 inpatients. Compared to study I, a significant increase in dosage accuracy (+ 19.3%; p <0.05) and correct choice of drug (+ 15.9%; p <0.05) was noted, as well as a decrease in potential clinically relevant drug-drug interactions with concomitant medication (- 13.9%; p <0.05). However, no significant improvement in indication and duration of antifungal treatment was identified. 56 recommendations were given to the prescribing physicians (acceptance rate: 66.1%). The implementation of AFS interventions based on pharmaceutical presence on the ward was associated with an improvement in antifungal use; however, indication and duration of therapy need to be communicated by infectious disease specialists. Considering the proportionally short observation period, the long-term effects of our AFS interventions need to be further investigated.

Antifungal stewardship: developments in the field.

To outline key drivers and components of antifungal stewardship (AFS) programmes, the evidence for specific interventions, and methods to assess performance of programmes. Recent developments in antifungal resistance and breakthrough invasive fungal diseases have increased the urgency for effective AFS. In practice, however, few hospitals have dedicated AFS programmes. To date, AFS programmes have centred around the provision of expert bedside reviews and have reduced costs and consumption of antifungal agents. Incorporating tools such as fungal diagnostics and therapeutic drug monitoring into AFS programme models is recommended. However, the application and impact of these tools in this context have not been adequately assessed. The effectiveness of AFS programmes has been measured in multiple ways but a standardized method of evaluation remains elusive. Few studies have explored the impact of AFS interventions on patient outcomes. The uptake of formal AFS programmes has been slow. New initiatives integrating AFS tools in programmes, and measuring the impacts on patient outcomes are required given such data are not readily available. A comprehensive approach to evaluate AFS programmes by correlating the quantity and quality of antifungal prescribing with impacts on patient outcomes is needed. Consensus definitions for core AFS metrics are required to benchmark performance and are essential to the resourcing and sustainability of these programmes.

410. Impact of Pediatric Antifungal Adverse Drug Reactions on Prescribing Practices

BackgroundWhile antibiotics frequently cause adverse drug reactions (ADR), the rate of antifungal (AF) ADR is unknown. The mechanisms of AF ADR and cross-reactivity among a drug class (i.e., azoles) are poorly understood. Given the use of AF therapy is on the rise, it is important to better understand the prevalence of AF ADR and how these reactions influence prescribing.MethodsThirty-two hospitals participated in a quarterly pediatric point prevalence survey that documented details on all admitted patients 0–17 years receiving any systemic antimicrobials, including drug, dose, and documented history of an antimicrobial ADR between June 2016 and December 2017. Patients who were recorded as receiving at least one systemic AF were included. A comparison of AF prescribing practices between those with and without an AF ADR was performed.ResultsAmong 13,179 total patients, 2,213 AF were prescribed to 2,101 unique patients. The most common indications for AF included prophylaxis (64%), fever with neutropenia (4%), neonatal sepsis (3%), and catheter-related bloodstream infection (3%). The prevalence of patients with any documented AF ADR was 2.9%. Amphotericin was most commonly associated with an ADR. Fluconazole was the most commonly prescribed AF in those with no ADR (49%) when compared with those with an AF ADR (13%; P < .05). Patients with an amphotericin ADR were more likely to receive voriconazole (29%) when compared with those without (15%; P < .05). Interestingly, posaconazole use was highest in those with an azole ADR (22%) when compared with those with no azole ADR (4%; P < .05). Echinocandin ADR were infrequent, and those with a reported ADR still received an echinocandin 62% of the time.ConclusionSignificant differences in antifungal prescribing exists based on ADR status. More work is needed to be able to effectively classify AF ADR, determine safe prescribing practices in those with an AF ADR, and evaluate outcomes associated with AF ADR status. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Effectiveness of an antifungal stewardship programme at a London teaching hospital 2010-16.

The need for antifungal stewardship is gaining recognition with increasing incidence of invasive fungal infection (IFI) and antifungal resistance alongside the high cost of antifungal drugs. Following an audit showing suboptimal practice we initiated an antifungal stewardship programme and prospectively evaluated its impact on clinical and financial outcomes. From October 2010 to September 2016, adult inpatients receiving amphotericin B, echinocandins, intravenous fluconazole, flucytosine or voriconazole were reviewed weekly by an infectious diseases consultant and antimicrobial pharmacist. Demographics, diagnosis by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) criteria, drug, indication, advice, acceptance and in-hospital mortality were recorded. Antifungal consumption and expenditure, and candidaemia species and susceptibility data were extracted from pharmacy and microbiology databases. A total of 432 patients were reviewed, most commonly receiving AmBisome® (35%) or intravenous fluconazole (29%). Empirical treatment was often unnecessary, with 82% having no evidence of IFI. Advice was given in 64% of reviews (most commonly de-escalating or stopping treatment) and was followed in 84%. Annual antifungal expenditure initially reduced by 30% (£0.98 million to £0.73 million), then increased to 20% above baseline over a 5 year period; this was a significantly lower rise compared with national figures, which showed a doubling of expenditure over the same period. Inpatient mortality, Candida species distribution and rates of resistance were not adversely affected by the intervention. Provision of specialist input to optimize antifungal prescribing resulted in significant cost savings without compromising on microbiological or clinical outcomes. Our model is readily implementable by hospitals with high numbers of at-risk patients and antifungal expenditure.

The use of echinocandins in hospitalized children in the United States.

Echinocandins are used for treatment of invasive candidiasis, but data on their use in children are limited. We sought to describe the epidemiology of echinocandin use in hospitalized children in the United States.We performed a retrospective cohort study of children <18 years of age hospitalized between January 2005 and December 2015 and exposed to ≥1 day of a systemic antifungal agent using the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database. Univariate analyses compared recipients of two echinocandin agents, caspofungin and micafungin. Crude prescribing rates of each antifungal group were calculated across hospitals and per year. The rate of antifungal agent prescribing over time was assessed using two-level mixed-effects negative binomial regression, accounting for variability in prescribing by hospital over time. From 2005 to 2015, fluconazole was prescribed most often (n = 148,859, 74.3%), followed by mould-active triazoles (n = 36,131, 18.0%), amphotericin products (n = 29,008, 14.5%), and echinocandins (n = 28,371, 14.2%). The crude rate of systemic antifungal prescribing decreased across all PHIS hospitals from 36.3 to 33.8 per 1000 admissions during the study period, but echinocandin prescribing increased from 2.2 to 7.2 per 1000 admissions. A mixed effects regression model revealed that echinocandin prescribing increased by 15.1% per year (95% CI 11.2-19.2). Echinocandin administration increased from 6.1% to 21.0% of admissions during which a systemic antifungal agent was given. In conclusion, echinocandin use has increased significantly over time, accounting for an increasing proportion of systemic antifungal prescribing in children.

Evaluation of the prescription, consumption and costs of antifungal drugs in a pediatric hospital in Chile

The increase of invasive fungal disease (IFD) in immunocompromised patients has led to the frequent prescription of highly active antifungal drugs but with a high economic cost. To characterize the use of antifungals drugs, evaluate its prescription and determine consumption and associated costs. Retrospective descriptive study from January 2015 to April 2016. Audit of prescriptions and review of clinical files. Each prescription was classified according to whether it corresponded to a possible, probable or proven invasive fungal disease (IFD). Consumptions and treatment costs were calculated. 152 antifungal prescriptions were audited in 79 patients. The total cost of antifungal medications was US $ 714,413. 52.1% of the expenditure (US $ 372,319) corresponded to indications in proven IFD, 10.7% (US $ 76,377) probable IFD, 0.8% (US $ 5,638) non-IFI, 12.2% (US $ 87,459) IFD possible and 1.5% (US $ 10,896) non-IFD and 22.6% (US $ 161,723) was prophylaxis. The highest consumption was in indications related to IFD tested with a proven DOT of 10.54 days, with liposomal amphotericin B and iv voriconazole the drugs with the highest consumption with a DOT probable_AnBL of 3.15 and DOT proven voriconazole iv of 3.01. The consumption of antifungal drug medications generates high costs at 12% of the total pharmacy budget of our institution. The expense was associated mainly with the indications in IFI tested the voriconazole and amphotericin B liposomal with the highest consumption which added to its high cost and prolonged days of general therapy a big impact in the budget.

A prediction rule for early recognition of patients with candidemia in Internal Medicine: results from an Italian, multicentric, case-control study.

Increasing prevalence of candidemia in Internal Medicine wards (IMWs) has been reported in recent years, but risk factors for candida bloodstream infection in patients admitted to IMW may differ from those known in other settings. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors and define a prediction rule for the early recognition of the risk of candidemia in IMW inpatients. This was a multicentric, retrospective, observational case-control study on non-neutropenic patients with candidemia admitted to IMWs of four large Italian Hospitals. Each eligible patient with candidemia (case) was matched to a control with bacteremia. Stepwise logistic regression analyses were performed. Overall, 300 patients (150 cases and 150 controls) were enrolled. The following factors were associated with an increased risk of candidemia and weighted to build a score: total parenteral nutrition (OR 2.45, p = 0.008; 1 point); central venous catheter (OR 2.19, p = 0.031; 1 point); peripherally inserted central catheter (OR 5.63, p < 0.0001; 3 points), antibiotic treatment prior (OR 2.06; p = 0.059; 1 point) and during hospitalization (OR2.38, p = 0.033; 1 point); neurological disability (OR 2.25, p = 0.01; 1 point); and previous hospitalization within 3 months (OR 1.56, p = 0.163; 1 point). At ROC curve analysis, a final score ≥ 4 showed 84% sensitivity, 76% specificity, and 80% accuracy in predicting the risk of candidemia. The proposed scoring system showed to be a simple and highly performing tool in distinguishing bloodstream infections due to Candida and bacteria in patients admitted to IMW. The proposed rule might help to reduce delay in empirical treatment and improve appropriateness in antifungal prescription in septic patients.

Antifungal treatment in haematological and oncological patients: Need for quality assessment in routine care.

Invasive fungal infections in haematological and oncological patients have a major impact on morbidity, mortality and treatment costs. Therefore, rational use of antifungal agents is important for optimal patient care and resource use. The study's objective was to analyse antifungal usage in a German tertiary teaching hospital, department of haematology and oncology, to evaluate quality of antifungal treatment and to assess the need for an antifungal stewardship programme. This retrospective observational study included patients ≥18years receiving systemic antifungals for prophylaxis or therapy of invasive fungal infection between January and June 2016. Appropriateness of antifungal prescriptions was evaluated in accordance with guidelines of the German Society of Haematology and Oncology (DGHO) and drug labelling. In total, 104/1278 (8.1%) patients received antifungals. One hundred seventy-one antifungals were prescribed: 48 for prophylaxis, 104 for empirical and 19 for targeted therapy. In 127 (74.3%) prescriptions, indication was appropriate, and in 132 (77.2%), choice of drug. Antifungals were correctly dosed in 131 prescriptions (76.6%). Thirty-four antifungals (20.0%) were co-administrated with interacting drugs (5 mild to moderate, 29 severe interactions). Results of this analysis demonstrate that use of systemic antifungals in routine care differs in a substantial number of patients from guideline and labelling recommendations. To optimise antifungal use, the implementation of antifungal stewardship programmes seems to be justified.

Aspergillus and other respiratory fungal infections in the ICU: diagnosis and management.

Filamentous fungi respiratory infections, namely because of Aspergillus, Mucorales, Fusarium, or Scedosporium, show rising incidence and occur more in populations which are not classically immunosuppressed. This and their persistent dismal prognosis are the focus of this review. Both an early diagnosis, rooted on a high level of suspicion and based on clinical picture, radiology, cultural microbiological exams, fungal biomarkers, PCR and biopsy, and an early therapy, including immunorecovery, whenever possible, good antifungal selection, and surgery for source control, are paramount to maximize the outcome in these diseases. An evolving antifungal armamentarium and a more Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics-based antifungal prescription may help to improve the prognosis. Improved awareness of these infections may increase the level of suspicion, promoting early diagnosis and treatment, ideally supported with expert stewardship.