Purpose: To provide data on antifungal management after lung TX, focusing on surveillance, prophylaxis.and pre-emptive therapy. Methods: All lung TX centers in the US were asked to participate. Participating centers filled out a survey document. Results: Thirty-seven of 69 active lung TX centers, accounting for 66% of all US lung transplants, responded, The median number of transplants performed per year was 14 (range1-52). and median age of the TX center was 9 years (range2-15 yrs). Pre-TX fungal surveillance was performed by 81% of centers with 67% surveying all patients and the rest just subsets. 72% of centers started antifungal treatment if Aspergillus was isolated before TX. Itraconazole was the preferred agent (86%). After TX, 76% of centers gave antifungal prophylaxis, although 24% did so only in selected patients. Prophylactic agents in order of preference were inhaled ampho B (61%), itraconazole (46%), parenteral ampho B (25%), and fluconazole (21%); many centers used more than one agent. Prophylaxis was started within 1 day in 71% of centers and by 7 days in all centers. Median duration was 3 mos. (range 1 mo. to life). All 37 centers gave antifungal therapy (median of 4.5 mos.) to patients colonized with Aspergillus and itraconazole was the preferred agent. Only 59% of centers treated patients colonized with Candida. Centers with larger volumes were less likely to treat pre-TX colonization with Candida and more likely to use itraconazole for post-TX colonization with Aspergillus (p 0.02). Only 14% of centers engaged in antifungal research at the time of the study. Conclusions: The majority of surveyed lung transplant programs actively manage fungal infection with prophylactic and/or pre-emptive strategies. Data from this survey may provide an impetus and basis for designing prospective studies.(supported by a grant from The Liposome Company).
Read full abstract