Anticoagulant Prescription Research Articles

Presentation, care, coronary intervention and outcomes of patients with NSTEMI according to age: insights from the international prospective ACVC-EAPCI EORP NSTEMI registry.

Older people less frequently receive invasive coronary angiography (ICA) for NSTEMI than younger patients. We describe care, ICA data, and in-hospital and 30-day outcomes of NSTEMI by age in a contemporary and geographically diverse cohort. Prospective cohort study including 2947 patients with NSTEMI from 287 centres in 59 countries, stratified by age (≥75years, n = 761). Quality of care was evaluated based on 12 guideline-recommended care interventions, and data collected on ICA. Outcomes included in hospital acute heart failure, cardiogenic shock, repeat myocardial infarction, stroke/transient ischaemic attack, BARC Type ≥3 bleeding and death, as well as 30-day mortality. Patients aged ≥75years, compared with younger patients, at presentation had a higher prevalence of comorbidities and oral anticoagulation prescription (22.4% vs 7.6%, p< 0.001). Older patients less frequently received ICA than younger patients (78.6% vs 90.6%, p< 0.001) with the recorded reason more often being advanced age, comorbidities or frailty. Of those who underwent ICA, older patients more frequently demonstrated 3-vessel, 4-vessel and/or left main stem coronary artery disease compared to younger patients (49.7% vs 34.1%, p< 0.001) but less frequently received revascularisation (63.6% vs 76.9%, p< 0.001). Older patients experienced higher rates of in-hospital acute heart failure (15.0% vs 8.4%, p< 0.001) and bleeding (2.8% vs 1.3%, p= 0.006), as well as in-hospital and 30-day mortality (3.4% vs 1.3%, p< 0.001; 4.8% vs 1.7%, p< 0.001; respectively), than younger patients. Patients aged ≥75years with NSTEMI, compared with younger patients, less frequently received ICA and guideline-recommended care, and had worse short-term outcomes.

Delay and Pay? Healthcare Costs Associated with Late Oral Anti-coagulant Prescribing in People with Atrial Fibrillation.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality and exerts an increasingly significant burden on global healthcare resources, with its prevalence rising with an ageing population. Despite a substantial thromboembolic risk, particularly in the period immediately following diagnosis, oral anti-coagulation is frequently not initiated or is delayed. The aim of this study was to evaluate healthcare costs in people with AF, comparing those who were commenced on oral anti-coagulation in the immediate period following the index diagnosis date with those in whom initiation was late and those who never started anti-coagulation. This retrospective cost analysis used linked Scottish health data to identify adults newly diagnosed with AF between January 1st 2012 and April 30th 2019 with a baseline CHA2DS2-VASc score of ≥2. This AF population was sub-divided according to timing of the first prescription of oral anti-coagulant (OAC) during a 2-year follow-up period: never started (OAC never initiated), immediate OAC (OAC prescribed within 60 days of incident AF diagnosis), and delayed OAC (OAC prescribed more than 60 days after incident AF diagnosis). A two-part model was developed, adjusted for key covariates, including age, sex, and frailty, to estimate costs for inpatient admissions, outpatient care, prescriptions, and care home admissions, and overall costs. Of an overall AF population of 54,385, 26,805 (49.3%) never commenced OAC, 7654 (14.1%) initiated an OAC late, and 19,926 (36.6%) were prescribed anti-coagulation immediately. The mean adjusted cost for the overall AF population was £7807 per person per year (unadjusted: £8491). Delayed OAC initiation was associated with the greatest adjusted estimated mean annual cost (unadjusted: £13,983; adjusted: £9763), compared to those that never started (unadjusted: £10,433; adjusted: £7981) and those that received an immediate OAC prescription (unadjusted: £3976; adjusted: £6621). Increasing frailty, mortality, and female sex were associated with greater healthcare costs. AF is associated with significant healthcare resource utilisation and costs, particularly in the context of delayed or non-initiation of anti-coagulation. Indeed, there exists substantial opportunity to improve the utilisation and prompt initiation in people newly diagnosed with AF in Scotland. Interventions to mitigate against the growing economic burden of AF should focus on reducing admissions to hospitals and care homes, which are the principal drivers of costs; prescriptions and outpatient appointments account for a relatively small proportion of overall costs for AF.

Anticoagulant Use in COVID-19 Patients: A Longitudinal Study From Zanjan, Iran.

Background The mortality and morbidity of thrombotic events in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are increasing worldwide. The clinical impact of prophylactic anticoagulation regimens among these patients in Iran remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the use of prophylactic anticoagulants and outcomes among COVID-19 patients admitted to a tertiary referral hospital. Methodology Patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and hospitalized between March 20 and June 20, 2020, were included in this longitudinal study after obtaining informed consent. Demographic and clinical data were collected from the hospital information system and medical records. Outcomes during this period were also evaluated. The data were entered into the preparation checklist and analyzed using SPSS version 24 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), employing chi-square, Fisher's exact, and Mann-Whitney U tests. Results Of the 831 enrolled patients, 51.9% were female, and 10.6% needed to be admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). The mean age of the patients was 57.16 ± 17.32 years, and the mortality rate was estimated to be 9.4%. Mortality rates were significantly higher at older ages, in men, patients with ICU admission, severe pulmonary involvement, malignancy, airway obstruction, ischemic heart disease, and previous cerebrovascular accidents. ICU admission and mortality were statistically significantly higher in those who received concurrent prophylactic anticoagulants and aspirin than in other individuals. Conclusions Our study demonstrated that administering prophylactic aspirin with or without anticoagulant agents in COVID-19 patients did not reduce mortality rates or ICU transfers. However, it is worth noting that anticoagulant prescription was associated with a decrease in ICU admissions, which could potentially alleviate the significantly higher mortality rates observed among ICU patients in this study. Further research is needed to explore the potential benefits of anticoagulants in COVID-19 treatment.

Prescription and switching patterns of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation

BackgroundThe patterns of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) selection and switching to a different oral anticoagulant (OAC) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are unknown. ObjectivesTo describe temporal patterns in first DOAC prescriptions, estimate the incidence, and identify predictors of switching to a different OAC within 1 year in OAC-naive AF patients. MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, using a near-nationwide prescription registry (IQVIA, the Netherlands), we determined the number of patients per month initiated on each DOAC and identified predictors of switching within 1 year with robust Poisson regression. ResultsWe included 94,874 patients. From November 2015 to November 2019, the monthly use of apixaban (n = 366 to n = 1066, +191%), rivaroxaban (n = 379 to n = 868, +129%), and edoxaban (n = 2 to n = 305, +15,150%) increased, whereas that of dabigatran decreased (n = 317 to n = 179, −44%). In the 66,090 patients with ≥1 year of available calendar time, 7% switched to a different OAC within 1 year. Strong predictors of switching to a different DOAC were using dabigatran (adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 3.33; 95% CI, 3.02-3.66) or edoxaban (aRR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.34-1.82) rather than apixaban and using a standard DOAC dose (aRR, 2.54; 95% CI, 2.23-2.88). Strong predictors of switching to a vitamin K antagonist were using rivaroxaban (aRR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.19-1.54 vs apixaban) and using a standard DOAC dose (aRR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.26-1.77). ConclusionIn the Netherlands, factor Xa inhibitors are increasingly being selected for OAC-naive AF patients. Seven percent of patients switch to a different OAC within 1 year, and the initial DOAC type and dose are strong predictors of switching.

Associations Between Changes in Maximum Daily Atrial Fibrillation Duration, Ischemic Stroke, and Mortality.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) outcomes are strongly associated with continuous measures of AF burden. This study sought to assess the association between changes in maximum daily AF duration (MDAFD) and stroke or mortality in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). The Optum deidentified electronic health record data set (2007-2021) was linked with the Medtronic CareLink heart rhythm database. Patients with CIEDs and health care activity recorded in the electronic health record were included, excluding those with oral anticoagulation prescription. MDAFD was assessed 30days post implant (baseline period) and 30days before censoring or an event. HRs for the primary analysis were adjusted for components of CHA2DS2-VASc, baseline MDAFD category, and chronic kidney disease. Of 26,400 patients (age 68 ± 13 years; follow-up 2.6 ± 1.6 years) analyzed, 2,544 (9.6%) had AF during baseline. Increased (vs stable or decreased) MDAFD category in follow-up was associated with a higher adjusted rate of stroke and mortality (HR: 1.80; 95%CI: 1.61-2.01). There was no association between decreased MDAFD in follow-up and the combined endpoint (HR: 0.82; 95%CI: 0.68-1.00). Subgroup analysis by baseline MDAFD category demonstrated that increased MDAFD in follow-up was associated with a greater risk of stroke or mortality among patients with no AF at baseline, and decreased MDAFD in follow-up was associated with a lower risk of stroke or mortality among patients with baseline MDAFD of 1 to<5.5 hours and 5.5 to<23.5 hours. In CIED patients not on oral anticoagulation, increased MDAFD in follow-up was associated with a higher rate of stroke and mortality. These results suggest that AF burden, and associated risk, s not stable over time.

Comprehensive Analysis of Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients with Isolated Atrial Flutter

Limited comparative data exist regarding the risk of cardiogenic emboli in patients with isolated atrial flutter (AFL). Some studies suggest a lower complication risk in AFL compared to atrial fibrillation (AFib), but methodological limitations and conflicting reports necessitate a comprehensive investigation. Our analysis proposes that isolated AFL carries a lower risk of ischemic events and left atrial thrombus formation than AFib. Importantly, we caution against applying stroke risk assessment approaches designed for AFib to AFL patients, as it may lead to harmful overestimations and unnecessary anticoagulant prescriptions. Furthermore, we highlight the current lack of sufficient data to determine the overall clinical benefit of prolonged anticoagulant therapy in patients with isolated AFL, especially when CHA2DS2-VASc index values are below 4. This review challenges existing perceptions, offering insights into the nuanced risk profiles of the transitional nature of isolated AFL due to the high incidence of AFib development within a year of AFL diagnosis. In conclusion, tailored risk assessments and further research are essential for precise clinical decision-making in this dynamic landscape.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Concomitant Anti-seizure Medications: A Retrospective, Case–Control Study in a Real-World Setting

Although prescription of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for epileptic patients on anti-seizure medications (ASMs) is on the increase, international guidelines pose strict restrictions because this may lead to pharmacologic interactions. However, current evidence on their clinical relevance remains scanty. This retrospective, case-control study assessed the frequency of ischemic/hemorrhagic events and epileptic seizures involving DOAC-ASM cotherapy in the real world, compared with DOAC and ASM monotherapy, in age- and gender-matched controls. Data on patients who had been prescribed a concomitant DOAC and ASM therapy for at least 6 months were extracted from the database of the Pharmaceutical Service of the Alessandria Province (Italy). After exclusions, the case group included 124 patients, 44 on valproic acid (VPA) and 80 on levetiracetam (LEV) concomitant with a DOAC, and it was compared with the DOAC-control and ASM-control groups. The clinical and laboratory data were extracted from the electronic archives of the hospitals in the same province. Two (1.6%) ischemic and 2 (1.6%) major hemorrhagic events were observed in the case group. Four (3.2%) ischemic and no hemorrhagic events occurred in the DOAC-control group. There were no statistically significant differences in the ischemic and hemorrhagic events between the case group (patients on concomitant LEV or VPA who were prescribed a DOAC) and the DOAC-control group, and there was no difference in the recurrence rate of epileptic seizures between the case group and the ASM-control group. Although this study has some limits, mainly the small sample size, our findings indicate that neither LEV nor VPA concomitant treatment significantly affects the effects of DOACs in a real-world setting.

Revision Hip Arthroplasty Performed by Fellowship-Trained Versus Non–Fellowship-Trained Surgeons: A Comparison of Perioperative Management and Complications

BackgroundSuccessful revision hip arthroplasty (rTHA) requires major resource allocation and a surgical team adept at managing these complex cases. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of rTHA performed by fellowship-trained and non–fellowship-trained surgeons. MethodsA national administrative database was utilized to identify 5,880 patients who underwent aseptic rTHA and 1,622 patients who underwent head-liner exchange for infection by fellowship-trained and non–fellowship-trained surgeons from 2010 to 2020 with a 5-year follow-up. Postoperative opioid and anticoagulant prescriptions were compared among surgeons. Patients treated by fellowship-trained and non–fellowship-trained surgeons had propensity scores matched based on age, sex, comorbidity index, and diagnosis. The 5-year surgical complications were compared using descriptive statistics. Multivariable analysis was performed to determine the odds of failure following head-liner exchange when performed by a fellowship-trained versus non–fellowship-trained surgeon. ResultsAseptic rTHA patients treated by fellowship-trained surgeons received fewer opioids (132 versus 165 milligram morphine equivalents per patient) and nonaspirin anticoagulants (21.4 versus 32.0%, P < .001). Fellowship-training was associated with lower dislocation rates (9.9 versus 14.2%, P = .011), fewer postoperative infections, and fewer periprosthetic fractures and re-revisions (15.2 versus 21.3%, P < .001). Head-liner exchange for infection performed by fellowship-trained surgeons was associated with lower odds of failure (31.2 versus 45.7%, odds ratio 0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.62 to 0.91, P < .001). ConclusionsrTHA performed by adult reconstruction fellowship-trained surgeons results in fewer re-revisions in aseptic cases and head-liner exchanges. Variations in resources, volumes, and perioperative protocols may account for some of the differences.

Thromboembolic events and vascular dementia in patients with atrial fibrillation and low apparent stroke risk

The prevention of thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation (AF) is typically restricted to patients with specific risk factors and ignores outcomes such as vascular dementia. This population-based cohort study used electronic healthcare records from 5,199,994 primary care patients (UK; 2005–2020). A total of 290,525 (5.6%) had a diagnosis of AF and were aged 40–75 years, of which 36,340 had no history of stroke, a low perceived risk of stroke based on clinical risk factors and no oral anticoagulant prescription. Matching was performed for age, sex and region to 117,298 controls without AF. During 5 years median follow-up (831,005 person-years), incident stroke occurred in 3.8% with AF versus 1.5% control (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 2.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.91–2.21; P < 0.001), arterial thromboembolism 0.3% versus 0.1% (HR 2.39, 95% CI 1.83–3.11; P < 0.001), and all-cause mortality 8.9% versus 5.0% (HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.38–1.50; P < 0.001). AF was associated with all-cause dementia (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.04–1.32; P = 0.010), driven by vascular dementia (HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.33–2.12; P < 0.001) rather than Alzheimer’s disease (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.70–1.03; P = 0.09). Death and thromboembolic outcomes, including vascular dementia, are substantially increased in patients with AF despite a lack of conventional stroke risk factors.

Usage pattern of anticoagulants in oncology patients receiving active anticancer therapies in Europe and Asia.

e23297 Background: Risks and benefits associated with use of anticoagulants (ACs) in cancer patients should be carefully assessed due to an increased risk of both thrombotic recurrences and bleeding events. Vitamin K antagonists (AVK) have been the most used ACs for patients with atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism for many years. Low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are preferred over AVK for cancer associated thrombosis. To better define the current scenario for ACs in cancer patients we propose to use market research data to describe treatment patterns in Europe and Asia. Methods: This study was conducted using Oncology Dynamics, an online secondary market research survey collecting anonymized patient data, from a representative panel of physicians. Data for 11,568 drug-treated oncology patients (p) (9,178 Europe p; 2,390 Asia p) with active cancer and anticoagulant therapies, collected between Q3 2021 and Q3 2023, from 5 European (France, Spain, Germany, Italy, &amp; UK) and 3 Asian countries (China, Japan, &amp; S. Korea), were analyzed. Patients with Genitourinary (GU) tumors were 36%, Lung 19%, Gastrointestinal (GI) 18%, Hepatobiliary/pancreas 12%, Gynecologic (Gyn) 12%, and Melanoma and Brain &lt; 5%. Results: 94% p were aged &gt; 50 years and 49% &gt; 70 years. 64% p were male and 36% female. 67% p showed advanced/metastatic stage vs 33% local/locally advanced stage. Globally, DOACs use was 55%, LMWH 35%, and AVK &lt; 10%; DOACs were the preferred ACs in Europe (64% p) and LMWH in Asia (59% p). Prescription of AVKs in Asia population was higher (17% p) compared with Europe (7% p). Difference in use of ACs by tumor type in European countries in favor of DOACs vs LMWH was noticeable in GU (75% p vs 13% p), GI (61% vs 34%) and Melanoma (71% vs 22%). In Asia population, predominance of LMWH vs DOACs was observable in Gyn (86% p vs 5% p), GI (57% vs 24%) and Hepatobiliary/pancreas (56% vs 35%). AVK were administered in 53% of GU Asia p and DOACs in 31%. Overall, bleeding was more frequently associated with AVK (32% p), compared to DOACs (15% p) and LMWH (9% p). Conclusions: This research highlights the differences in ACs prescription in oncology patients between Asia and Europe, with a preference for LMWH in former and DOACs in the latter. DOACs are the most common ACs prescribed overall, while AVK, associated with higher incidence of bleeding, are used in a small population. A more comprehensive analysis of the included variables will be shared.

Phenotypes and outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation: a global unsupervised cluster analysis from Phase II/III of the GLORIA-AF registry

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) patients are characterized by a great clinical heterogeneity and complexity across the world. Usual classifications may not adequately characterize this population. Data-driven cluster analysis reveals different possible classifications of patients. Purpose To identify different clusters of AF patients who share similar clinical phenotypes and evaluate the association between identified clusters and clinical outcomes using cluster analysis. Methods An agglomerative hierarchical cluster analysis was performed in patients from phase II/III of the GLORIA-AF registry. Associations between clusters and a composite outcome composed of all-cause death, stroke and major bleeding were evaluated using Cox regression analyses. Results The study included 26,045 AF patients (mean±SD age 70.1±10; 44.8% female) with a median [IQR] follow-up of 3 years [2.3-3.1]. Five clusters were identified: Cluster 1 was composed of young males from North America with morbid obesity and cardiovascular (CV) risk factors; Cluster 2 included older Asian patients with lower body mass index (BMI), fewer CV risk factors, lower anticoagulation rate but the highest AF ablation rate; Cluster 3 identified European males with CV comorbidities and behavioral disorders (smoking, alcohol abuse); Cluster 4 was characterized by patients with the highest rate of permanent AF, cancer, anticoagulant therapy prescription ; Cluster 5 included older women from Europe with high CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores, the highest heart rate, lower BMI and high rate of previous stroke and transient ischemic attack. The incidence of the composite outcome increased a stepwise fashion among clusters from 3.2% patient-years (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.4-4.1) for Cluster 1 to 6% patient-years (95% CI: 5.6-6.4) for Cluster 5 (p&amp;lt;0.0001): Cluster 1 versus 2 hazard ratio (HR): 0.85 (95% CI 0.65–1.11); 2 versus 3 HR: 0.84 (95% CI 0.76–0.93); 3 versus 4 HR: 0.9 (95% CI 0.82–0.99) and 4 versus 5 HR: 0.82 (95% CI 0.74–0.91). Conclusion Cluster analysis identified five statistically-driven groups of AF patients, with distinct phenotype characteristics and associated with different risks for major clinical adverse events.Baseline characteristics.Dendrogram and Kaplan Meier-curves.

Stroke risk assessment in different atrial fibrillation subtypes: CHA2DS2-VASc score and beyond

Abstract Background Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) have been known to have an inhomogeneous risk of stroke, with several well-documented risk factors including hypertension, history of stroke, and diabetes mellitus that have been incorporated into the CHA2DS2–VASc score to stratify risk levels. Accumulating evidence has suggested that AF subtype, namely persistent AF and paroxysmal AF, also have an impact on stroke development. Purpose This study focused on the impact of AF subtype on stroke risk in a large, long-term follow-up cohort as to provide insight of the impact on ischemic stroke risks. Such findings may play a role in future ischemic stroke risk stratification in selected patients. Methods A total of 7346 AF patients were followed up for 10 years from January 2010 to December 2020 (mean follow-up time 2.74 years). Among these patients, 2460 (33.5%) had persistent or permanent AF (PerAF) and 4886 (66.5%) had paroxysmal AF (PAF). The study evaluated the risk of ischemic stroke between the two groups using Cox models adjusting for all components of the CHA2DS2–VASc score. Analyses were further stratified into the usage of oral anticoagulation (OAC) or no OAC. Results Comparing AF patients based on subtype, it was found that PerAF patients were older, had a higher prevalence of previous stroke, congestive heart failure, PAD, DM, and were more often prescribed anticoagulants. Univariate analysis found patients with PerAF at a higher risk for ischemic stroke (HR 1.262, p&amp;lt;0.001). The results remained significant after multivariate analysis with factors of the CHA2DS2–VASc score (HR 1.234, p&amp;lt;0.001). After stratifying patients according to anticoagulation prescription, PerAF and PAF patients were found to have similar rates of developing ischemic stroke in patients under DOAC. Conclusions Patients with PerAF have a higher risk of stroke during follow-up independent of components of the CHA2DS2VASc score. In patients with OAC use, there was no difference in stroke risk between AF subtypes.Stroke Risk in OAC-naive patientsStroke Risk in OAC-experienced patients

#280 Effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants vs VKA in patients on chronic dialysis: a target trial emulation using nationwide registry data

Abstract Background and Aims The mortality and morbidity rates among patients on dialysis remain high and cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in this population. In chronic kidney disease (CKD), a major thromboembolic risk is paradoxically associated with a major haemorrhagic risk. Hence, the prescription of oral anticoagulants in CKD patients is challenging. Clinical trials of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are scarce and inconclusive in patients who are receiving dialysis, for whom DOAC are not labelled in Europe. In an exhaustive French nationwide registry of patients undergoing chronic dialysis, we compared the effectiveness and safety of off-label DOAC use versus approved vitamin K antagonist (VKA). Method Data on patients on dialysis were extracted from the French Renal Epidemiology and Information Network (REIN) registry and merged with data from the French national healthcare system database (Système National des Données de Santé, SNDS). Patients on dialysis who had initiated treatment with an oral anticoagulant between January 1st, 2012, and December 31st, 2020, were eligible for inclusion. The primary safety outcome was the occurrence of major bleeding events and the primary effectiveness outcome was the occurrence of thrombotic events. Using target trial emulation design, we compared the safety and effectiveness outcomes for DOAC and VKA using propensity-score-weighted cause-specific Cox regression. Results 8 954 patients received an oral anticoagulant (483 DOAC and 8 471 VKA) for the first time after the initiation of dialysis. Over a median [interquartile range] follow-up period of 1.7 [0.8-3.2] years, 2 567 patients presented a first thromboembolic event and 1 254 patients had a bleeding event. After propensity score adjustment, the risk of a thromboembolic event was significantly lower in patients treated with a DOAC than in patients treated with a VKA (weighted hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0.66 [0.46; 0.94] (Figure). A non-significant trend toward lower risk of major bleeding events was found in patients treated with a DOAC compared to patients treated with a VKA (weighted HR [95% CI]: 0.68 [0.41; 1.12]) (Figure). Sensitivity analyses showed the same trends. Conclusion The fact that patients on dialysis are excluded from large, cardiovascular-disease-focused randomized controlled trials (such as those with DOACs) significantly limits the evidence needed to make clinical decisions. Most of the retrospective cohort studies comparing these two drug classes were performed in the USA, where, in contrast to Europe, apixaban has been approved for the treatment of non-valvular fibrillation in patients on haemodialysis. Our real-world study of patients on dialysis is one of the first of its type to have assessed the effectiveness and safety of off-label DOAC prescription (relative to VKA prescription) in Europe. In a large group of dialysis patients initiating oral anticoagulation, the off-label use of DOACs was associated with a statistically significant lower risk of thromboembolic events, and a non-significant trend toward lower risk of bleeding relative to VKA use. These results are reassuring with regard to the off-label use of DOACs and might facilitate the establishment of an expert consensus and guidelines on antithrombotic therapy in patients with ESKD.

Ischemic stroke subtypes: risk factors, treatments, and 1-month prognosis – The Lille, France Stroke Registry

ObjectivesFirst, this registry-based study aimed to comprehensively analyze patients' medical histories and treatments based on ischemic strokes’ etiology. We focused on the management of atrial fibrillation among patients diagnosed with cardioembolic stroke. Then, our objective was to identify prognostic factors associated with 28-day mortality. Materials and methodsAll ischemic strokes occurring in adults between 2014 and 2021 in Lille, France, were categorized using the TOAST classification. Comparative analyses of patients' medical characteristics were conducted across subtypes. Survival rates within 28 days post-stroke were assessed, and factors influencing mortality were identified using a multivariate Cox model. Results1912 ischemic strokes were recorded, due to cardioembolism (36%), large-artery atherosclerosis (9%), small-artery occlusion (9%), other determined causes (6%), or undetermined causes (39%). The median NIHSS score after cardioembolic stroke (6, IQR: 3-13) was twice that after small-artery occlusion (3, IQR: 2-5). Among patients with cardioembolic stroke, 26% were diagnosed post-admission with atrial fibrillation. For the 42% diagnosed pre-admission, only 54% had prior prescriptions for oral anticoagulants. Reperfusion therapies were administered in 21% of cases, with significant variations across subtypes. Mortality rates were higher after cardioembolic strokes (17%) than after small-artery occlusions (3%). Prognostic factors included etiology, high NIHSS score, atrial fibrillation, and previous heparin prescription. ConclusionsWhile atrial fibrillation was underdiagnosed and undertreated, patients with cardioembolic stroke exhibited high severity and elevated mortality rates. Etiology emerged as an independent predictor of early mortality, regardless of NIHSS score upon admission. These findings underscore the importance of targeted prevention to improve patient outcomes after ischemic stroke.

Factors associated with non-fatal heart failure and atrial fibrillation or flutter within the first 30 days post COPD exacerbation: a nested case-control study

BackgroundAn immediate, temporal risk of heart failure and arrhythmias after a Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) exacerbation has been demonstrated, particularly in the first month post-exacerbation. However, the clinical profile of patients who develop heart failure (HF) or atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF) following exacerbation is unclear. Therefore we examined factors associated with people being hospitalized for HF or AF, respectively, following a COPD exacerbation.MethodsWe conducted two nested case-control studies, using primary care electronic healthcare records from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum linked to Hospital Episode Statistics, Office for National Statistics for mortality, and socioeconomic data (2014-2020). Cases had hospitalization for HF or AF within 30 days of a COPD exacerbation, with controls matched by GP practice (HF 2:1;AF 3:1). We used conditional logistic regression to explore demographic and clinical factors associated with HF and AF hospitalization.ResultsOdds of HF hospitalization (1,569 cases, 3,138 controls) increased with age, type II diabetes, obesity, HF and arrhythmia history, exacerbation severity (hospitalization), most cardiovascular medications, GOLD airflow obstruction, MRC dyspnea score, and chronic kidney disease. Strongest associations were for severe exacerbations (adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=6.25, 95%CI 5.10-7.66), prior HF (aOR=2.57, 95%CI 1.73-3.83), age≥80 years (aOR=2.41, 95%CI 1.88-3.09), and prior diuretics prescription (aOR=2.81, 95%CI 2.29-3.45).Odds of AF hospitalization (841 cases, 2,523 controls) increased with age, male sex, severe exacerbation, arrhythmia and pulmonary hypertension history and most cardiovascular medications. Strongest associations were for severe exacerbations (aOR=5.78, 95%CI 4.45-7.50), age≥80 years (aOR=3.15, 95%CI 2.26-4.40), arrhythmia (aOR=3.55, 95%CI 2.53-4.98), pulmonary hypertension (aOR=3.05, 95%CI 1.21-7.68), and prescription of anticoagulants (aOR=3.81, 95%CI 2.57-5.64), positive inotropes (aOR=2.29, 95%CI 1.41-3.74) and anti-arrhythmic drugs (aOR=2.14, 95%CI 1.10-4.15).ConclusionsCardiopulmonary factors were associated with hospitalization for HF in the 30 days following a COPD exacerbation, while only cardiovascular-related factors and exacerbation severity were associated with AF hospitalization. Understanding factors will help target people for prevention.

A prospective audit on adult thromboprophylaxis and therapeutic anticoagulation prescribing and administration practices in Galway University Hospitals

Abstract Introduction Anticoagulants are high-alert medications that can cause significant patient harm if used inappropriately.[1] These preparations have been identified as a significant medication safety concern in Galway University Hospitals and are one of the most frequently reported medication incidents in Ireland.[2] A key performance indicator agreed by the local Medication Safety Subgroup and Drugs and Therapeutics Committee was to conduct an anticoagulation audit against local guidelines to identify patterns and develop quality improvements. Methods A prospective audit was conducted over six weeks from September to November 2022 by five interprofessional data collectors using a data collection tool and accessing drug records and clinical notes. Development of the tool was guided by national[1] and local guidelines as well as design input from local expert specialist doctors and pharmacists. Adult inpatients on all wards receiving thromboprophylaxis (after 24 hours of admission) or therapeutic anticoagulation were included. Paediatrics and psychiatry were excluded. The protocol and tool were approved by the local Clinical Audit Committee, piloted with three inpatients, and communicated to all data collectors prior to commencement. Generated data were anonymous and securely stored. Data analysis was carried out by two independent researchers to confirm reliability of results. Results A total of 242 inpatients were audited on 26 wards: -Patients prescribed thromboprophylaxis (52%; 126/242). -Patients prescribed therapeutic anticoagulation (26%; 63/242) -Patients not prescribed anticoagulants (22%; 54/242) Most patients (92%; 216/234) did not have a thromboprophylaxis risk assessment form completed/signed. Nineteen patients (35%; n=54) not prescribed thromboprophylaxis or therapeutic anticoagulation should have been prescribed anticoagulation. High compliance with guidelines (&amp;gt;80%) included: i) anticoagulants prescribed in correct section of drug record, ii) appropriate agents prescribed, iii) correct dose and frequency, iv) few dose delays and omissions, and v) indication mostly documented. Low compliance with guidelines (&amp;lt;35%) included: -Patient height and weight not documented: unable to calculate creatinine clearance to determine accurate dose. -Incorrect administration times for once daily therapeutic dosing (should be in morning to facilitate surgery next day) and twice daily dosing (mostly 8am and 10pm = gap of 14 hours and 10 hours). Conclusion Results have identified varying levels of compliance with local anticoagulation guidelines. To date, there has been continuous targeted education and training on appropriate anticoagulation use for doctors, nurses, and pharmacy staff inclusive of the development and implementation of a new bespoke eLearning module for high-alert medications (which includes the appropriate use of anticoagulants specific to Galway University Hospitals). High leverage strategies, such as electronic prescribing, is a current consideration to standardise practices. Strengths include study robustness, interprofessional collaboration, and transferability to other hospitals. Perhaps reducing the scope in a re-audit which will be conducted in 2024 to identify any improvements in medication safety and patient care with these agents may allow for further in-depth analysis.

Development and validation of a clinical decision support system to prevent anticoagulant duplications

Background and ObjectiveUnintended duplicate prescriptions of anticoagulants increase the risk of serious adverse events. Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSSs) can help prevent such medication errors; however, sophisticated algorithms are needed to avoid alert fatigue. This article describes the steps taken in our hospital to develop a CDSS to prevent anticoagulant duplication (AD). MethodsThe project was composed of three phases. In phase I, the status quo was established. In phase II, a clinical pharmacist developed an algorithm to detect ADs using daily data exports. In phase III, the algorithm was integrated into the hospital's electronic health record system. Alerts were reviewed by clinical pharmacists before being sent to the prescribing physician. We conducted a retrospective analysis of all three phases to assess the impact of the interventions on the occurrence and duration of ADs. Phase III was analyzed in more detail regarding the acceptance rate, sensitivity, and specificity of the alerts. ResultsWe identified 91 ADs in 1581 patients receiving two or more anticoagulants during phase I, 70 ADs in 1692 patients in phase II, and 57 ADs in 1575 patients in phase III. Mean durations of ADs were 1.8, 1.4, and 1.1 calendar days during phases I, II, and III, respectively. In comparison to the baseline in phase I, the relative risk reduction of AD in patients treated with at least two different anticoagulants during phase III was 42% (RR: 0.58, CI: 0.42–0.81). A total of 429 alerts were generated during phase III, many of which were self-limiting, and 186 alerts were sent to the respective prescribing physician. The acceptance rate was high at 97%. We calculated a sensitivity of 87.4% and a specificity of 87.9%. ConclusionThe stepwise development of a CDSS for the detection of AD markedly reduced the frequency and duration of medication errors in our hospital, thereby improving patient safety.

Scalable Approach to Consumer Wearable Postmarket Surveillance: Development and Validation Study.

With the capability to render prediagnoses, consumer wearables have the potential to affect subsequent diagnoses and the level of care in the health care delivery setting. Despite this, postmarket surveillance of consumer wearables has been hindered by the lack of codified terms in electronic health records (EHRs) to capture wearable use. We sought to develop a weak supervision-based approach to demonstrate the feasibility and efficacy of EHR-based postmarket surveillance on consumer wearables that render atrial fibrillation (AF) prediagnoses. We applied data programming, where labeling heuristics are expressed as code-based labeling functions, to detect incidents of AF prediagnoses. A labeler model was then derived from the predictions of the labeling functions using the Snorkel framework. The labeler model was applied to clinical notes to probabilistically label them, and the labeled notes were then used as a training set to fine-tune a classifier called Clinical-Longformer. The resulting classifier identified patients with an AF prediagnosis. A retrospective cohort study was conducted, where the baseline characteristics and subsequent care patterns of patients identified by the classifier were compared against those who did not receive a prediagnosis. The labeler model derived from the labeling functions showed high accuracy (0.92; F1-score=0.77) on the training set. The classifier trained on the probabilistically labeled notes accurately identified patients with an AF prediagnosis (0.95; F1-score=0.83). The cohort study conducted using the constructed system carried enough statistical power to verify the key findings of the Apple Heart Study, which enrolled a much larger number of participants, where patients who received a prediagnosis tended to be older, male, and White with higher CHA2DS2-VASc (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes, stroke, vascular disease, age 65-74 years, sex category) scores (P<.001). We also made a novel discovery that patients with a prediagnosis were more likely to use anticoagulants (525/1037, 50.63% vs 5936/16,560, 35.85%) and have an eventual AF diagnosis (305/1037, 29.41% vs 262/16,560, 1.58%). At the index diagnosis, the existence of a prediagnosis did not distinguish patients based on clinical characteristics, but did correlate with anticoagulant prescription (P=.004 for apixaban and P=.01 for rivaroxaban). Our work establishes the feasibility and efficacy of an EHR-based surveillance system for consumer wearables that render AF prediagnoses. Further work is necessary to generalize these findings for patient populations at other sites.

Evaluating the effect of inequalities in oral anti-coagulant prescribing on outcomes in people with atrial fibrillation

Abstract Aims Whilst anti-coagulation is typically recommended for thromboprophylaxis in atrial fibrillation (AF), it is often never prescribed or prematurely discontinued. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of inequalities in anti-coagulant prescribing by assessing stroke/systemic embolism (SSE) and bleeding risk in people with AF who continue anti-coagulation compared with those who stop transiently, permanently, or never start. Methods and results This retrospective cohort study utilized linked Scottish healthcare data to identify adults diagnosed with AF between January 2010 and April 2016, with a CHA2DS2-VASC score of ≥2. They were sub-categorized based on anti-coagulant exposure: never started, continuous, discontinuous, and cessation. Inverse probability of treatment weighting-adjusted Cox regression and competing risk regression was utilized to compare SSE and bleeding risks between cohorts during 5-year follow-up. Of an overall cohort of 47 427 people, 26 277 (55.41%) were never anti-coagulated, 7934 (16.72%) received continuous anti-coagulation, 9107 (19.2%) temporarily discontinued, and 4109 (8.66%) permanently discontinued. Lower socio-economic status, elevated frailty score, and age ≥ 75 were associated with a reduced likelihood of initiation and continuation of anti-coagulation. Stroke/systemic embolism risk was significantly greater in those with discontinuous anti-coagulation, compared with continuous [subhazard ratio (SHR): 2.65; 2.39–2.94]. In the context of a major bleeding event, there was no significant difference in bleeding risk between the cessation and continuous cohorts (SHR 0.94; 0.42–2.14). Conclusion Our data suggest significant inequalities in anti-coagulation prescribing, with substantial opportunity to improve initiation and continuation. Decision-making should be patient-centred and must recognize that discontinuation or cessation is associated with considerable thromboembolic risk not offset by mitigated bleeding risk.

Targeted prophylactic anticoagulation based on the TRiP(cast) score in patients with lower limb immobilisation: a multicentre, stepped wedge, randomised implementation trial

Prophylactic anticoagulation in emergency department patients with lower limb trauma requiring immobilisation is controversial. The Thrombosis Risk Prediction for Patients with Cast Immobilisation-TRiP(cast)-score could identify a large subgroup of patients at low risk of venous thromboembolism for whom prophylactic anticoagulation can be safely withheld. We aimed to prospectively assess the safety of withholding anticoagulation for patients with lower limb trauma at low risk of venous thromboembolism, defined by a TRiP(cast) score of less than 7. CASTING was a stepped-wedge, multicentre, cluster-randomised trial with blinded outcome assessment. 15 emergency departments in France and Belgium were selected and randomly assigned staggered start dates for switching from the control phase (ie, anticoagulation prescription according to the physician's usual practice) to the intervention phase (ie, targeted anticoagulation according to TRiP(cast) score: no prescription if score <7 and anticoagulation if score was ≥7). Patients were included if they presented to a participating emergency department with lower limb trauma requiring immobilisation for at least 7 days and were aged 18 years or older. The primary outcome was the 3-month cumulative rate of symptomatic venous thromboembolism during the intervention phase in patients with a TRiP(cast) score of less than 7. The targeted strategy was considered safe if this rate was less than 1% with an upper 95% CI of less than 2%. The primary analysis was performed in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04064489). Between June 16, 2020, and Sept 15, 2021, 15 clusters and 2120 patients were included. Of the 1505 patients analysed in the intervention phase, 1159 (77·0%) had a TRiP(cast) score of less than 7 and did not receive anticoagulant treatment. The symptomatic venous thromboembolism rate was 0·7% (95% CI 0·3-1·4, n=8/1159). There was no difference between the control and the intervention phases in the cumulative rate of symptomatic venous thromboembolism or in bleeding rates. Patients with a TRiP(cast) score of less than 7 who are not receiving anticoagulation have a very low risk of venous thromboembolism. A large proportion of patients with lower limb trauma and immobilisation could safely avoid thromboprophylaxis. French Ministry of Health.