Antiangiogenic Antibody Research Articles

Computational Evaluation of Improved HIPEC Drug Delivery Kinetics via Bevacizumab-Induced Vascular Normalization

Background: Oxaliplatin-based hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) using the original 30 min protocol has shown limited benefits in patients with peritoneal metastasis of colorectal cancer (PMCRC), likely due to the short duration, which limits drug penetration into tumor nodules. Bevacizumab, an antiangiogenic antibody that modifies the tumor microenvironment, may improve drug delivery during HIPEC. This in silico study evaluates the availability of oxaliplatin within tumor nodules when HIPEC is performed after bevacizumab treatment. Methods: Using a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model of HIPEC, the temperature and oxaliplatin distribution within the rat abdomen were calculated, followed by a model of drug transport within tumor nodules located at various sites in the peritoneum. The vascular normalization effect of the bevacizumab treatment was incorporated by adjusting the biophysical parameters of the tumor nodules. The effective penetration depth values, including the thermal enhancement ratio of cytotoxicity, were then compared between HIPEC alone and HIPEC combined with the bevacizumab treatment. Results: After bevacizumab treatments at doses of 0.5 mg/kg and 5 mg/kg, the oxaliplatin availability increased by up to 20% and 45% when HIPEC was performed during the vascular normalization phase, with the penetration depth increasing by 1.5-fold and 2.3-fold, respectively. Tumors with lower collagen densities and larger vascular pore sizes showed higher oxaliplatin enhancement after the combined treatment. Bevacizumab also enabled a reduction in the oxaliplatin dose (up to half at 5 mg/kg bevacizumab) while maintaining effective drug levels in the tumor nodules, potentially reducing systemic toxicity. Conclusions: These findings suggest that administering oxaliplatin-based HIPEC during bevacizumab-induced vascular normalization could significantly improve drug penetration and enhance treatment efficacy.

A new perspective on antiangiogenic antibody drug resistance: Biomarkers, mechanisms, and strategies in malignancies.

Drug resistance of malignant tumor leads to disease progression be the bottleneck in clinical treatment. Antiangiogenic therapy, which aims to "starve" the tumor by inhibiting angiogenesis, is one of the key strategies in clinical oncology treatments. Recently, dozens of investigational antibody drugs and biosimilars targeting angiogenesis have obtained regulatory approval for the treatment of various malignancies. Moreover, a new generation of bispecific antibodies based on the principle of antiangiogenesis are being advanced for clinical trial to overcome antiangiogenic resistance in tumor treatment or enhance the efficacy of monotherapy. Tumors often develop resistance to antiangiogenesis therapy, presenting as refractory and sometimes even resistant to new therapies, for which there are currently no effective management strategies. Thus, a detailed understanding of the mechanisms mediating resistance to antiangiogenesis antibodies is crucial for improving drug effectiveness and achieving a durable response to antiangiogenic therapy. In this review, we provide a novel perspective on the tumor microenvironment, including antibody structure, tumor stroma, and changes within tumor cells, to analyze the multifactorial reasons underlying resistance to antiangiogenesis antibodies. The review also enumerates biomarkers that indicate resistance and potential strategies for monitoring resistance. Furthermore, based on recent clinical and preclinical studies, we summarize potential strategies and translational clinical trials aimed at overcoming resistance to antiangiogenesis antibodies. This review provides a valuable reference for researchers and clinical practitioners involved in the development of new drugs or therapeutic strategies to overcome antiangiogenesis antibodies resistance.

The Safety and Effectiveness of Bevacizumab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer With Unresectable Metastases: A Real-Life Study From the South of Morocco.

Background Colorectal cancer constitutes a significant public health challenge, despite remarkable strides made in the last two decades, particularly in the medical management of metastatic stages. Notable progress has been achieved through targeted therapies such as anti-epidermal growth factor receptors or anti-angiogenic antibodies, as well as advancements in surgical approaches for hepatic metastases. This study seeks to assess the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in individuals with metastatic colorectal cancer. Methodology This is an observational, cross-sectional, retrospective study of all patients who were followed up for metastatic colorectal cancer with unresectable metastases and were treated with bevacizumab in combination with standard chemotherapy from January 2010 until December 2019 in the medical oncology department of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Souss-Massa of Agadir. Results Of the total 162 cases, 117 (72%) had metastatic disease, and 45 (28%) progressed to metastatic disease after initial treatment. The median age of the patients was 55 years (range = 23-79 years) with a sex ratio of 1.1 (M/F). The tumor was located in the left colon in 135 (83.3%)patients. The results represented adenocarcinoma in 137 (84.6)cases and mucinous subtype in 23 (14.19) cases. The three most common sites of metastasis were the liver (99, 61.1), peritoneum (67, 41.3), and lung (33, 20.3). In the first line, allpatients received bi-chemotherapy plus bevacizumab, i.e., fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and leucovorin in 34 (20.9%) patients; capecitabine plus oxaliplatin in 88 (54.3%) patients; leucovorin, fluorouracil, and irinotecan in 17 (10.4%) patients; andcapecitabine plusirinotecan in 23 (14.1%) patients. Response after first-line treatment was progression in 74 (45.7) cases, stability in 42 (25.9) cases, partial response in 35(21.6) cases, and complete response in 11 (6.8) cases. Nine (6%) patients were able to benefit from surgical resection of metastatic lesions. Overall, 77 (47%)patients received second-line chemotherapy, i.e., 5-FU with irinotecan in 40 (51.8%)cases or with oxaliplatin in 30(38.8%) cases. Two patients developed undesirable side effects under bevacizumab (hypertension). The median progression-free survival and median overall survival of the study cohort were 9 months and 14 months, respectively. Nevertheless, patients who underwent primary tumor resection (p = 0.048), those with right‑sided tumors (p = 0.022), those who received a higher number of treatment cycles (p = 0.020), and those who received maintenance treatment (p = 0.001) had a longer median overall survival. Conclusions Chemotherapy combination with bevacizumab is considered as the cornerstone of metastatic colorectal cancer treatment in our region. With the new healthcare and social security systems, easier access to expensive treatments and molecular pathology tests is currently available. It is important to highlight that real-world data can offer valuable insights into the daily clinical practice of medical oncology.

Bevacizumab Alone Versus Bevacizumab Plus Irinotecan in Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma: A Nationwide Population-Based Study.

For treating recurrent glioblastoma, for which there is no established treatment, the antiangiogenic antibody, bevacizumab, is used alone or with irinotecan. This study was aimed at comparing the survival of patients with recurrent glioblastoma receiving bevacizumab monotherapy and those receiving bevacizumab plus irinotecan combination therapy (B+I) by using a nationwide population-based dataset. Patients matching the International Classification of Diseases code C71.x were screened from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database. From January 2008 to November 2021, patients who underwent surgery or biopsy and subsequent standard concurrent chemoradiation with temozolomide were included. Among them, those who received bevacizumab monotherapy or B+I were selected. Demographic characteristics, inpatient stay, prescription frequency, survival outcomes, and steroid prescription duration were compared between these two groups. Eight hundred and forty-six patients who underwent surgery or biopsy and received concurrent chemoradiotherapy with temozolomide were included. Of these, 450 and 396 received bevacizumab monotherapy and B+I, respectively. The corresponding median overall survival from the initial surgery was 22.60 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 20.50-24.21) and 20.44 months (95% CI, 18.55-22.60; P = 0.508, log-rank test). The B+I group had significantly more bevacizumab prescriptions (median 5 times; BEV group: median 3 times). Cox analysis, based on the postsurgery period, revealed that male sex (hazard ratio [HR], 1.28; P = 0.002), older age (HR, 1.01; P = 0.042), and undergoing biopsy instead of surgery (HR, 1.79; P < 0.0001) were significantly associated with decreased survival. Fewer radiotherapy cycles correlated with improved survival outcomes (HR, 0.63; P = 0.001). Cox analysis, conducted from the start of chemotherapy including bevacizumab, showed that male sex was the only variable significantly associated with decreased survival (HR, 1.18; P = 0.044). We found no significant difference in overall survival between the bevacizumab monotherapy and B+I groups. Considering the additional potential toxicity associated with irinotecan, bevacizumab monotherapy could be a suitable treatment option for treating recurrent glioblastoma.

Treatment Options in Late-Line Colorectal Cancer: Lessons Learned from Recent Randomized Studies.

Systemic treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has improved considerably over the past 20 years. First- and second-line combinations of 5FU, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan, with or without anti-angiogenic and/or anti-EGFR antibodies, were approved shortly after the turn of the millennium. Further triumphs were not seen for almost 10 years, until the approval of initially regorafenib and shortly after trifluridine/tipiracil. A growing understanding of tumor biology through molecular profiling has led to further treatment options. Here, we review the most recent clinical data for late-line treatment options in mCRC, focusing on randomized trials if available. We include recommendations for options in unselected patients and therapies that should only be offered in patients with distinct tumor profiles (e.g., BRAF mutations, KRAS G12C mutations, HER2 amplification, deficient MMR, or NTRK gene fusions).

NCOG-06. BEVACIZUMAB ALONE VERSUS BEVACIZUMAB PLUS IRINOTECAN IN PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA: A NATIONWIDE POPULATION-BASED STUDY

Abstract INTRODUCTION There is no established treatment for recurrent glioblastoma. For the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma, the antiangiogenic antibody, bevacizumab, is used either alone or in combination with Irinotecan. This study aimed to compare the survival of patients receiving bevacizumab monotherapy (BEV) and those receiving bevacizumab plus irinotecan combination therapy (B+I) in recurrent glioblastoma (GBM), using a nationwide population-based dataset. METHODS Patients matching the ICD code C71.x were screened from the national database. From January 2008 to November 2021, 846 patients who had undergone surgery or biopsy and received concurrent chemoradiotherapy with Temozolomide were included. Of these, 450 received BEV, while 396 received B+I. The patients' demographic characteristics, inpatient stay duration, prescription frequency, and survival outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS The median overall survival from initial surgery was 22.60 months (9% CI: 20.50 – 24.21) and 20.44 months (95% CI: 18.55 – 22.60) in the BEV and B+I groups, respectively (p=0.5079, log rank test). The BEV group was older and had a higher percentage of females compared to the B+I group. Younger age, female gender, and having surgery rather than biopsy were associated with better prognosis. CONCLUSION This study found no significant difference in overall survival between bevacizumab alone versus bevacizumab plus irinotecan combination therapy in patients with recurrent GBM. Considering the additional potential toxicity associated with irinotecan, bevacizumab monotherapy may be a suitable treatment option.

NCOG-08. BEVACIZUMAB ALONE VERSUS BEVACIZUMAB PLUS IRINOTECAN IN PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA: A NATIONWIDE POPULATION-BASED STUDY

Abstract INTRODUCTION There is no established treatment for recurrent glioblastoma. For the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma, the antiangiogenic antibody, bevacizumab, is used either alone or in combination with Irinotecan. This study aimed to compare the survival of patients receiving bevacizumab monotherapy (BEV) and those receiving bevacizumab plus irinotecan combination therapy (B+I) in recurrent glioblastoma (GBM), using a nationwide population-based dataset. METHODS Patients matching the ICD code C71.x were screened from the national database. From January 2008 to November 2021, 846 patients who had undergone surgery or biopsy and received concurrent chemoradiotherapy with Temozolomide were included. Of these, 450 received BEV, while 396 received B+I. The patients' demographic characteristics, inpatient stay duration, prescription frequency, and survival outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS The BEV group was older and had a higher percentage of females compared to the B+I group. The survival analysis revealed no significant difference in survival times between the two groups in the univariate and multivariate analysis. Younger age, female gender, and having surgery rather than biopsy were associated with better prognosis. CONCLUSION This study found no significant difference in overall survival between bevacizumab monotherapy and bevacizumab plus irinotecan combination therapy in patients with recurrent GBM. Considering the additional potential toxicity associated with irinotecan, bevacizumab monotherapy may be a suitable treatment option.

VEGFR-TKI treatment for radiation-induced brain injury after gamma knife radiosurgery for brain metastases from renal cell carcinomas.

Antiangiogenic vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors play an essential role in systemic therapy for renal cell carcinoma. Given the anti-edematous effect of bevacizumab, an antiangiogenic antibody targeting vascular endothelial growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors should exert therapeutic effects on radiation-induced brain injury after stereotactic radiosurgery. This preliminary study aimed to investigate the therapeutic effect of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor against radiation-induced brain injury. Magnetic resonance images for six patients treated with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors who were diagnosed with radiation-induced brain injury following gamma knife radiosurgery were retrospectively reviewed. The median brain edema volume and tumour mass volume in the pre-tyrosine kinase inhibitor period were 57.6mL (range: 39.4-188.2) and 3.2mL (range: 1.0-4.6), respectively. Axitinib, pazopanib (followed by cabozantinib) and sunitinib were administered in four, one and one cases, respectively. The median brain edema volume and tumour mass volume in the post-tyrosine kinase inhibitor period were 4.8mL (range: 1.5-27.8) and 1.6mL (range: 0.4-3.6), respectively. The median rates of reduction in brain edema volume and tumour mass volume were 90.8% (range: 51.9-97.6%) and 57.2% (range: 20.0-68.6%), respectively. The post-tyrosine kinase inhibitor values for brain edema volume (P=0.027) and tumour mass volume (P=0.008) were significantly lower than the pre-tyrosine kinase inhibitor values. Changes in volume were correlated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor use. This study is the first to demonstrate the therapeutic effects of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors on radiation-induced brain injury in patients with brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma treated via gamma knife radiosurgery.

Abstract 12079: The Sexual Dimorphism of IgG1 Anti-angiogenic Activity Depends on Y Chromosome Genes

Section: Angiogenesis, Vascular Development and Regeneration Introduction: IgG1 antibodies possess sexually dimorphic anti-angiogenic activity independent of antigen binding. Mosaic loss of Y chromosome (LOY) is associated with numerous cardiovascular-related diseases, and the male specific region of the Y chromosome (MSY) contributes to hypertension, atherosclerosis, cancer, and male infertility. The biological mechanisms underlying these associations is largely unknown and not fully understood. A better understanding of the role of protein coding genes in the Y chromosome and angiogenesis regulation may lead to a better understanding of these associations and better treatments. Hypothesis: The loss of function of genes in the MSY of males impairs the anti-angiogenic activity IgG1 antibodies. Methods: MSY transcripts were quantified in human macrophages and primary bone marrow derived macrophages (BMDMs) from C57BL/6J male mice by qPCR. MSY genes were inhibited by siRNAs targeting DDX3Y, KDM5D, and UTY, followed by treatment with a human IgG1 in a chemotaxis assay. Laser photocoagulation-induced choroidal neovascularization (CNV) was performed in male C57BL/6J followed by intravitreous injection of full-length humanized IgG1 antibody along with a cell-permeable siRNA scrambled control or siRNA targeting DDX3Y. Results: Male macrophages from human and mouse transcribe multiple Y chromosome genes. Silencing of multiple MSY-encoded genes abrogated the ability of IgG1 to suppress chemotaxis and angiogenesis, rendering male systems to respond similarly to female systems. Male macrophages from DDX3Y knockout mice were also resistant to IgG1 treatment. siRNA targeting DDX3Y suppressed inhibition in male mice. Conclusions: The antiangiogenic activity IgG1 antibodies is greatly reduced by antagonizing Y chromosome genes. These studies highlight protein coding genes of the Y chromosome as a potential angiogenesis modulating target responsible for sexually dimorphic responses.

Pharmacokinetic evaluation of radiolabeled intraocular anti-CLEC14a antibody in preclinical animal species and application in humans.

Anti-angiogenic antibodies are widely used in the treatment of neovascular macular degeneration. Human antibody targeting C-type lectin domain family 14 member A (CLEC14a) is potential therapeutic agents owing to its antiangiogenic activity. In the present study, we aimed to predict the human intraocular pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of an anti-CLEC14a antibody. I-125 labeled aflibercept and anti-CLEC14a antibody were intravitreally injected into mice, rats, and rabbits. Single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography imaging was performed, and the intraocular radioactivity concentration (%ID/ml) was obtained. The PK parameters in those three animal species were obtained by compartmental analysis. The PK parameters in humans were estimated by allometric scaling of the animal PK parameters with consideration of the hydrodynamic radius of the antibody. The mean half-life values of intraocular I-125-labeled aflibercept in mice, rats, and rabbits were 1.13 days, 1.25 days, and 4.91 days, respectively, by analysis with a one-compartment model. The predicted human half-life of intraocular aflibercept was 5.75 days based on vitreal volume by allometric scaling. The half-life values of intraocular I-125-labeled anti-CLEC14a in mice, rats and rabbits were 1.05 days, 1.84 days, and 6.37 days, respectively, by analysis with a one-compartment model. The predicted human half-life of intraocular anti-CLEC14a was 10.29 days based on vitreal volume. According to the hydrodynamic volume of the anti-CLEC14a, the predicted human half-life of intraocular anti-CLEC14a was 9.81 days. The PK characteristics of the intraocular anti-CLEC14a antibody were evaluated noninvasively in animals using I-125 labeling, and the intraocular PK characteristics in humans were predicted using these animal data. This methodology can be applied for the development of new antiangiogenic antibodies to treat macular degeneration.

Treatment with a VEGFR-2 antibody results in intra-tumor immune modulation and enhances anti-tumor efficacy of PD-L1 blockade in syngeneic murine tumor models.

Prolonged activation of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) due to mis-regulation of the VEGF pathway induces aberrant blood vessel expansion, which supports growth and survival of solid tumors. Therapeutic interventions that inhibit the VEGFR-2 pathway have therefore become a mainstay of cancer treatment. Non-clinical studies have recently revealed that blockade of angiogenesis can modulate the tumor microenvironment and enhance the efficacy of concurrent immune therapies. Ramucirumab is an FDA-approved anti-angiogenic antibody that inhibits VEGFR-2 and is currently being evaluated in clinical studies in combination with anti-programmed cell death (PD-1) axis checkpoint inhibitors (pembrolizumab, durvalumab, or sintilimab) across several cancer types. The purpose of this study is to establish a mechanistic basis for the enhanced activity observed in the combined blockade of VEGFR-2 and PD-1-axis pathways. Pre-clinical studies were conducted in murine tumor models known to be responsive to anti-PD-1 axis therapy, using monoclonal antibodies that block mouse VEGFR-2 and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). Combination therapy resulted in enhanced anti-tumor activity compared to anti-PD-L1 monotherapy. VEGFR-2 blockade at early timepoints post-anti-PD-L1 therapy resulted in a dose-dependent and transient enhanced infiltration of T cells, and establishment of immunological memory. VEGFR-2 blockade at later timepoints resulted in enhancement of anti-PD-L1-driven immune cell infiltration. VEGFR-2 and PD-L1 monotherapies induced both unique and overlapping patterns of immune gene expression, and combination therapy resulted in an enhanced immune activation signature. Collectively, these results provide new and actionable insights into the mechanisms by which concurrent VEGFR-2 and PD-L1 antibody therapy leads to enhanced anti-tumor efficacy.

Imprime PGG Enhances Anti-Tumor Effects of Tumor-Targeting, Anti-Angiogenic, and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Antibodies

Imprime PGG (Imprime) is in late-stage clinical development as a combinatorial agent with several therapeutic modalities. Here we present pre-clinical mechanistic data supportive of Imprime, a soluble yeast β-1,3/1,6-glucan pathogen-associated molecular pattern able to prime innate immune cells in a Dectin-1dependent manner. In tumor-free mice, Imprime evoked broad innate immune responses (type I interferon signature, mobilization of myeloid cells, dendritic cell and monocyte/macrophage expression of co-stimulatory ligands like CD86, and activation of natural killer cells). Imprime-mediated activation of myeloid cells also resulted in functional priming of antigen-specific CD8 T cell response. In tumor-bearing mice, Imprime monotherapy further resulted in activation of systemic and tumor infiltrating macrophages and enhanced cytotoxic CD8 T cell trafficking. Imprime enhanced the anti-tumor activity of several combinatorial agents in mouse cancer models; anti-tyrosinase-related protein 1 antibody in B16F10 melanoma experimental lung metastasis model, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 antibody in H1299 and H441 lung cancer, and anti-programmed cell death protein 1 antibody in MC38 colon cancer models. Mechanistically, combining Imprime with these combinatorial therapeutic agents elicited enhanced innate immune activation, supporting immunological synergy. Finally, Imprime treatment induced similar in vitro phenotypic and functional activation of human innate immune cells. Collectively, these data demonstrate Imprime’s potential to orchestrate a broad, yet coordinated, anti-cancer immune response and complement existing cancer immunotherapies.

Cost Effectiveness of Bevacizumab Plus Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Advanced and Metastatic Cervical Cancer in India-A Model-Based Economic Analysis.

PURPOSEPatients with advanced and metastatic cervical cancer have a poor prognosis with a 1-year survival rate of 10%-15%. Recently, an antiangiogenic humanized monoclonal antibody bevacizumab has shown to improve the survival of these patients. This study was designed to assess the cost effectiveness of incorporating bevacizumab with standard chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with advanced and metastatic cervical cancer in India.METHODSUsing a disaggregated societal perspective and lifetime horizon, a Markov model was developed for estimating the costs and health outcomes in a hypothetical cohort of 1,000 patients with advanced and metastatic cervical cancer treated with either standard chemotherapy alone or in combination with bevacizumab. Effectiveness data for each of the treatment regimen were assessed using estimates from Gynecologic Oncology Group 240 trial. Data on disease-specific mortality in metastatic cervical cancer, health system cost, and out-of-pocket expenditure were derived from Indian literature. Multivariable probabilistic sensitivity analysis was undertaken to account for parameter uncertainty.RESULTSOver the lifetime of one patient with advanced and metastatic cervical cancer, bevacizumab along with standard chemotherapy results in a gain of 0.275 (0.052-0.469) life-years (LY) and 0.129 (0.032-0.218) quality-adjusted life-years (QALY), at an additional cost of $3,816 US dollars (USD; 2,513-5,571) compared with standard chemotherapy alone. This resulted in an incremental cost of $19,080 USD (7,230-52,434) per LY gained and $34,744 USD (15,782-94,914) per QALY gained with the use of bevacizumab plus standard chemotherapy.CONCLUSIONAddition of bevacizumab to the standard chemotherapy is not cost effective for the treatment of advanced and metastatic cervical cancer in India at a threshold of 1-time per-capita gross domestic product.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Molecular Pathogenesis and Therapeutic Advances.

Simple SummaryPatients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most common primary tumor of the liver, have poor prognosis and are increasing worldwide. The recent approval of several novel therapies for HCC was long expected, and it will make physician decision-making more challenging. The molecular mechanisms triggered during chronic liver diseases and the cellular cross-talk established with liver cells influence HCC growth and may reduce immune control, making this knowledge relevant to help with clinical decisions. This review analyzes these issues and points to relevant topics for future research.Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most common form of liver cancer, continues to be a serious medical problem with poor prognosis, without major therapeutic improvement for years and increasing incidence. Fortunately, advances in systemic treatment options are finally arriving for HCC patients. After a decade of sorafenib as a standard therapy for advanced HCC, several tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), antiangiogenic antibodies, and immune checkpoint inhibitors have reached the clinic. Although infections by hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus remain principal factors for HCC development, the rise of non- alcoholic steatohepatitis from diabetes mellitus or metabolic syndrome is impeding HCC decline. Knowledge of specific molecular mechanisms, based on the etiology and the HCC microenvironment that influence tumor growth and immune control, will be crucial for physician decision-making among a variety of drugs to prescribe. In addition, markers of treatment efficacy are needed to speed the movement of patients towards other potentially effective treatments. Consequently, research to provide scientific data for the evidence-based management of liver cancer is guaranteed in the coming years and discussed here.

Abstract P001: The anti-angiogenic antibody BD0801 demonstrates better anti-tumor activity than bevacizumab and synergize with chemotherapies in multiple tumor models

Abstract Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptor (VEGFR) play a fundamental role in tumor growth and angiogenesis. An increasing number of evidences have suggested enhanced anti-tumor activity when combining anti-angiogenic agents with chemotherapies in the clinic. To support the clinical development of BD0801, a humanized rabbit anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody, we assessed anti-tumor activities of BD0801 using a series of preclinical tumor mouse models including human ovarian cancer OVCAR-8 and SK-OV-3, human non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) NCI-H460, and human renal cancer Caki-1 models, with bevacizumab being used as a benchmark. We also investigated the pharmacological kinetics (PK) of BD0801 in cynomolgus monkeys. BD0801 or bevacizumab were intravenously injected into tumor bearing mice at 0.8 mg/kg, 2.5 mg/kg or 7.5 mg/kg twice a week. Combinations of chemotherapy and BD0801 or bevacizumab were also investigated in some of the tumor models. BD0801 presented more potent anti-tumor activities than bevacizumab in ovarian cancer, NSCLC and renal cancer mouse models in a dose-dependent manner. The tumor growth inhibition of BD0801 was 2-20%, 34-66%, or 32-84% when dosed at 0.8 mg/kg, 2.5 mg/kg or 7.5 mg/kg, respectively. Besides, combination of 2.5 mg/kg BD0801 and 10 mg/kg paclitaxel presented a statistically stronger antitumor activity in human ovarian cancer models compared to both single treatments (P&amp;lt;0.05). Combination of 2.5 mg/kg BD0801, 10 mg/kg paclitaxel, and 80 mg/kg carboplatin also presented a stronger antitumor activity than BD0801 or chemotherapy alone in the human NSCLC model. In cynomolgus monkeys received a single intravenous injection of BD0801 at 1.5, 5, and 15 mg/kg, the half-life (t1/2) of BD0801 was 39.4-142 h, the clearance (Cl) was 0.321-0.900 mL/h/kg, and the apparent volume of distribution (Vd) was 49.5-64.4 mL/kg. The peak concentrations (Cmax) of BD0801 were proportional to the doses administered. No difference on the PK parameters was observed between female and male monkeys. Taken together, this study has demonstrated BD0801 as a more potent molecule than bevacizumab in some preclinical tumor models, supporting further clinical development plans for BD0801, especially in combination with chemotherapeutics. Citation Format: Liting Xue, Jianxing Tang, Yuyin Ding, Lei Song, Shansen Xu, Yue Huang, Yan Wu, Wenjie Song, Renhong Tang, Wenqing Yang. The anti-angiogenic antibody BD0801 demonstrates better anti-tumor activity than bevacizumab and synergize with chemotherapies in multiple tumor models [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC Virtual International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2021 Oct 7-10. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2021;20(12 Suppl):Abstract nr P001.

Structure-based engineering of an antiangiogenic scFv antibody for soluble production in E. coli without loss of activity.

Development of monoclonal antibody therapeutics against vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2) protein, which is the main regulator in angiogenesis, has been a major challenge for years. In the current study, we engineer an inclusion body forming single-chain variable fragment (scFv) against VEGFR-2 by using complementarity determining regions (CDR) grafting technique to improve its solubility and investigate the activity of the engineered molecule. CDR sequences of the target scFv were grafted into the framework of another intrinsically soluble scFv molecule. Based on the computational results, CDR grafting has increased the solubility of the grafted scFv molecule. Results confirmed that the grafting approach increased in vivo folding properties of the target scFv molecule compared with the original scFv molecule. Similar binding affinities to the VEGFR-2 were observed for the original and the grafted scFv by surface plasmon resonance assays. Biological activity assays, including human umbilical vein endothelial cells proliferation and wound healing assays, showed that grafted scFv molecule has an antiangiogenic property. This study suggests that an antiangiogenic scFv fully expressed as an inclusion body can be rescued by grafting its CDR regions to a scFv expressed in a soluble form without any loss in its binding property and its activity.

Antiangiogenic antibody BD0801 combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors achieves synergistic antitumor activity and affects the tumor microenvironment

BackgroundSignaling through VEGF/VEGFR induces cancer angiogenesis and affects immune cells. An increasing number of studies have recently focused on combining anti-VEGF/VEGFR agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to treat cancer in preclinical and clinical settings. BD0801 is a humanized rabbit anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody in the clinical development stage.MethodsIn this study, the anti-cancer activities of BD0801 and its potential synergistic anti-tumor effects when combined with different immunotherapies were assessed by using in vitro assays and in vivo tumor models. Ex vivo studies were conducted to reveal the possible mechanisms of actions (MOA) underlying the tumor microenvironment modification.ResultsBD0801 showed more potent antitumor activity than bevacizumab, reflected by stronger blockade of VEGF/VEGFR binding and enhanced inhibitory effects on human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). BD0801 exhibited dose-dependent tumor growth inhibitory activities in xenograft and murine syngeneic tumor models. Notably, combining BD0801 with either anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 antibodies showed synergistic antitumor efficacy in both lung and colorectal cancer mouse models. Furthermore, the mechanistic studies suggested that the MOA of the antitumor synergy involves improved tumor vasculature normalization and enhanced T-cell mediated immunity, including increased tumor infiltration of CD8+ and CD4+ T cells and reduced double-positive CD8+PD-1+ T cells.ConclusionsThese data provide a solid rationale for combining antiangiogenic agents with immunotherapy for cancer treatment and support further clinical development of BD0801 in combination with ICIs.

1226P Efficacy and safety of Anti-EGFR TKIs combined with bevacizumab or ramucirumab in the first-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Anti-EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the standard therapy in the first-line treatment of EGFR mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It was aimed to increase the efficacy by adding anti-angiogenic antibodies to these agents, and several randomized controlled trials (RCTs)have been conducted in this area in recent years. Here, we performed an efficacy and safety analysis of RCTs investigating the addition of bevacizumab or ramucirumab to EGFR-TKIs in EGFR mutant advanced NSCLC.

Systemic treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: An EASL position paper

The last 5 years have witnessed relevant advances in the systemic treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. New data have emerged since the development of the EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma in 2018. Drugs licensed in some countries now include 4 oral multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (sorafenib, lenvatinib, regorafenib and cabozantinib), 1 anti-angiogenic antibody (ramucirumab) and 4 immune checkpoint inhibitors, alone or in combination (atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab, ipilimumab in combination with nivolumab, nivolumab and pembrolizumab in monotherapy). Prolonged survival in excess of 2 years can be expected in most patients with sensitive tumours and well-preserved liver function that renders them fit for sequential therapies. With different choices available in any given setting, the robustness of the evidence of efficacy and a correct matching of the safety profile of a given agent with patient characteristics and preferences are key in making sound therapeutic decisions. The recommendations in this document amend the previous EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines and aim to help clinicians provide the best possible care for patients today. In view of several ongoing and promising trials, further advances in systemic therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma are foreseen in the near future and these recommendations will have to be updated regularly.

Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab Biosimilar FKB238 Versus Originator Bevacizumab: Results from AVANA, a Phase III Trial in Patients with Non-Squamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (non-sq-NSCLC)

BackgroundBevacizumab is an antiangiogenic recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody that inhibits tumor growth. FKB238, a bevacizumab biosimilar, has analytical pharmacokinetic and safety profiles similar to those of bevacizumab.ObjectiveThis phase III trial (NCT02810457) compared the efficacy and safety of FKB238 with that of bevacizumab in patients with advanced/recurrent non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (non-sq-NSCLC).MethodsThis global, multicenter, double-blind, parallel, randomized, comparative clinical trial enrolled and randomized patients with advanced/recurrent non-sq-NSCLC to receive intravenous infusions of either FKB238 15 mg/kg or bevacizumab 15 mg/kg. All patients received intravenous infusions of paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 and carboplatin (area under the curve 6.0) immediately prior to investigational products for 4–6 cycles. FKB238 and bevacizumab were administered on day 1 of each 21-day cycle until objective progressive disease by RECIST version 1.1 or other discontinuation criteria were met. The primary efficacy endpoint was overall response rate (ORR), including complete and partial response and based on blinded independent central review assessment. Other efficacy determinations included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and immunogenicity. Adverse events and severity were reported.ResultsThe ORR for the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (N = 731) was 51.6% in the FKB238 arm (N = 364) and 53.7% in the bevacizumab arm (N = 367). The FKB238:bevacizumab ORR ratio (ITT population) was 0.96 (90% confidence interval [CI] 0.86–1.08), and the difference in ORR (per-protocol set) between FKB238 and bevacizumab was − 0.02 (95% CI − 0.09 to 0.06). Both CIs fell within the prespecified equivalence margins. Estimated median PFS was 7.72 and 7.62 months in the FKB238 and bevacizumab arms, respectively (hazard ratio 0.97; 95% CI 0.82–1.16). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported for 94.2% and 95.1% of patients in the FKB238 and bevacizumab arms, respectively. Grade 3 or higher TEAEs were reported for 53.6% and 55.5% of patients in the FKB238 and bevacizumab arms, respectively. Serious TEAEs were reported for 25.1% and 26.0% of patients treated with FKB238 and bevacizumab, respectively.ConclusionsEfficacy equivalence was demonstrated between the two drugs, and safety profiles were similar. There were no meaningful differences in efficacy and safety between FKB238 or bevacizumab in patients with non-sq-NSCLC.Trial registration numberNCT02810457.