anti-Xa Levels Research Articles

‘Door-to-prophylaxis’ as a novel quality improvement metric in prevention of venous thromboembolism following traumatic injury

ObjectiveVenous thromboembolism (VTE) risk reduction strategies include early initiation of chemoprophylaxis, reducing missed doses, weight-based dosing and dose adjustment using anti-Xa levels. We hypothesized that time to initiation of chemoprophylaxis...

Weight-Based Dosing for Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin (Enoxaparin) Administration to Achieve Optimal VTE Prophylaxis in Trauma Patients.

Patients admitted after traumatic injuries are at high risk for developing venous thromboembolism (VTE). Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is commonly used to prevent VTE in this patient population; however, the optimal dosing strategy has yet to be determined. To address this question, a fixed-dosing strategy of LMWH was compared to a weight-based dosing strategy of LMWH for VTE prophylaxis. A retrospective, pre-post implementation cohort study compared a fixed vs a weight-based dosing strategy of LMWH for VTE prophylaxis. Patients admitted to our level 1 trauma center were included if they had an estimated glomerular filtration rate >30mL/min/1.73m2, received at least 3 doses of LMWH, and had an appropriately drawn anti-Xa level on their initial dosing regimen. Patients in the pre-cohort received 30mg LMWH subcutaneously twice daily as the initial dosing regimen. Patients in the post-cohort received .5mg/kg (max 60mg) LMWH subcutaneously every 12h as the initial dosing regimen. A goal anti-Xa of .2-.4 IU/mL was targeted for prophylaxis. There were 817 patients in the fixed-dosing group (FDG) and 874 patients in the weight-based dosing group (WBDG). In the FDG, 42.8% of the patients achieved the goal initial anti-Xa level, with 54.1% and 3.1% reaching sub- and supratherapeutic doses, respectively. In the WBDG, 66.5% of patients reached goal initial anti-Xa levels, with 23.5% and 10.1% at sub- and supratherapeutic levels. The distribution of dose ranges was significantly different between the dosing strategies (P-value <.001). There was no difference in the number of patients who received blood products (39.1% vs 41.7%. P-value = .299). In our study, weight-based dosing of LMWH yielded a significantly higher proportion of patients who achieved goal prophylactic anti-Xa levels than fixed-dosing of LMWH. Larger-scale studies are needed to assess the risk of VTE events and bleeding with these dosing strategies.

Prophylactic Enoxaparin Dosing Using Anti-Factor Xa Levels in Hepatic Surgery Patients: A Pilot Study.

This study examines the safety and efficacy of using peak anti-Xa levels to achieve prophylactic enoxaparin (Lovenox, Sanofi-Aventis) levels in patients who underwent hepatic surgery. Prospectively enrolled patients undergoing major and minor hepatic procedures received postoperative enoxaparin dosing. The enoxaparin dose was adjusted to attain a peak anti-Xa level ≥ 0.20U/ml. This group was compared to a historical cohort of patients who underwent similar procedures and received standard postoperative VTE chemoprophylaxis dosing. Inpatient postoperative VTE rates were higher in the control group when compared to the experimental group (0 patients [0.00%] vs 4 patients [8.16%]; P = .035). There was no statistically significant difference in number of postoperative blood transfusions, discharge hemoglobin, or in-hospital bleeding events. Adjusting enoxaparin dosing to achieve prophylactic peak anti-Xa levels of ≥0.20IU/ml was associated with a reduced incidence of symptomatic inpatient postoperative VTE in patients who underwent hepatic surgery without increasing postoperative bleeding events.

Enoxaparin thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized obese pediatric patients.

Enoxaparin is an anticoagulant used for pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in pediatrics. Enoxaparin pharmacokinetics can be altered in the setting of obesity. Optimal enoxaparin dosing for thromboprophylaxis in children with obesity remains unclear. A retrospective review was conducted of pediatric patients who weighed ≥60kg with BMI≥95th percentile, received enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis, and had at least one appropriately drawn anti-factor Xa(anti-Xa) from 2013 to 2022. Anti-Xa levels were reviewed for patients initially treated with enoxaparin 30mg every 12h. The average daily enoxaparin dose required to achieve an anti-Xa of 0.2-0.4 unit/mL, which was stratified by BMI percentile and weight, was calculated. Of 116 patients (median age 15.8 years) included for analysis, 106 patients were initially treated with enoxaparin 30mg every 12h. Anti-Xa levels were<0.2 unit/mL in 53% of patients with BMI>99th percentile and 54% of patients>100kg. Ninety-one patients had at least one anti-Xa 0.2-0.4unit/mL with an average daily enoxaparin dosing of 66mg. When stratified by severity of obesity, higher doses were required to attain an anti-Xa 0.2-0.4 unit/mL in patients with BMI>99th percentile compared with those with 95th-99th percentile (67.8±15.7 vs. 62±5.6mg/day, p=.01). Patients>100kg required significantly higher dose than those ≤100kg (69.1±15.5 vs 61.2±7.3mg/day, p=.002). Increased initial dosing and/or anti-Xa level monitoring should be considered in adolescents with severe obesity receiving enoxaparin thromboprophylaxis.

Anticoagulation with argatroban using hemoclot™ targets is safe and effective in CARDS patients receiving venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: An exploratory bi-centric cohort study

Direct thrombin inhibitors, including argatroban, are increasingly used for anticoagulation during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO). In many centers activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) is used for monitoring, but it can be affected by several confounders. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of anticoagulation with argatroban titrated according to diluted thrombin time targets (hemoclot™ assay) compared to anti-Xa guided anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin (UFH). MethodsThis cohort study included adults at two tertiary care centers who required VV ECMO for severe COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (CARDS). Patients received center-dependent argatroban or UFH for anticoagulation during ECMO. Argatroban was guided following a hemoclot™ target range of 0.4–0.6 μg/ml. UFH was guided by anti-factor Xa (antiXa) levels (0.2–0.3 IU/ml). The primary outcome was safety of argatroban compared to UFH, assessed by time to first clinically relevant bleeding event or death during ECMO. Secondary outcomes included efficacy (time to thromboembolism) and feasibility (proportion of anticoagulation targets within range). ResultsFrom 2019 to 2021 57 patients were included in the study with 27 patients (47 %) receiving argatroban and 30 patients (53 %) receiving UFH. The time to the first clinically relevant bleeding or death during ECMO was similar between groups (HR (argatroban vs. UFH): 1.012, 95 % CI 0.44–2.35, p = 0.978). Argatroban was associated with a decreased risk for thromboembolism compared to UFH (HR 0.494 (95 % CI 0.26–0.95; p = 0.034)). The overall proportion of anticoagulation within target ranges was not different between groups (46 % (23–54 %) vs. 46 % (37 %–57 %), p = 0.45). ConclusionAnticoagulation with argatroban according to hemoclot™ targets (0.4–0.6 μg/ml) compared to antiXa guided UFH (0.2–0.3 IU/ml) is safe and may prolong thromboembolism-free time in patients with severe ARDS requiring VV ECMO.

Andexanet Alfa: What We Have Learned from Clinical Trials and Real-World Data.

Andexanet alfa is a specific reversal agent for factor Xa inhibitors with immediate reversal of their anticoagulant effect. Andexanet alfa is currently approved for use in patients treated with rivaroxaban and apixaban who have life-threatening or uncontrolled bleeding. New data from both controlled clinical trials and real-world experience are continuously being published, providing greater insight into the clinical characteristics of the drug, such as efficacy and safety. It is worth considering that andexanet alfa could be of benefit in a variety of different clinical scenarios where patients receiving treatment with apixaban and rivaroxaban (and endoxaban) have life-threatening conditions. These different clinical scenarios, which range from pre-treatment of urgent surgery, especially neurosurgical interventions, and concomitant use of andexanet alfa and prothrombin complex concentrate to onset of bleeding more than 6 h prior to admission, should be clarified as well as the issue of "low/high" dose of andexanet alfa and the need for baseline anti-Xa inhibitor levels measured by point-of-care testing. Finally, management of patients at high risk of thrombosis or recent arterial/venous thrombotic events needs to be further explored. In this current opinion, we address these urgent questions in the light of recent literature and clinical trial data.

Thromboelastography versus thromboelastometry for unfractionated heparin monitoring in adult patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Background: Monitoring the anticoagulant effect of unfractionated heparin (UFH) in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients is complex but critically important to balance the risks of treatment related bleeding and circuit thrombosis. While guidelines recommend using more than one method to monitor UFH activity, the use of thromboelastometry (ROTEM) to monitor UFH in ECMO patients has not been investigated in detail.Methods: This is an observational, single-center retrospective study looking at adult ECMO patients on UFH that had ROTEM and thromboelastography (TEG) tests obtained concurrently. A total of 20 samples were obtained from nine patients during the study period, seven of which were on veno-arterial (VA) ECMO and two of which were on veno-venous (VV) ECMO.Results: Under institutional standard operating practice, when TEG and/or activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) were considered therapeutic, intrinsic thromboelastometry clotting time (INTEM CT) was only 1.2 times higher than the normal range. TEG based monitoring compared to aPTT based monitoring tended to result in lower anti-Xa levels and less intensive anticoagulation. For the total cohort, bleeding events, driven by the need for blood transfusions, were more common compared to ischemic events (77% vs 11%; p = 0.02).Conclusion: INTEM CT tended to be less sensitive to lower doses of UFH with a value of 1.2 times higher than the normal range when aPTT and/or TEG were considered therapeutic. Due to the relative insensitivity of ROTEM, our institution decided to continue to use TEG instead of ROTEM. Larger, multicenter trials may be helpful to validate these findings.

Smaller nadroparin dose reductions required for patients with renal impairment: A multicenter cohort study

BackgroundGuidelines advise 50 % and 25 % dose reduction of the therapeutic nadroparin dose (86 IU/kg) in patients with eGFR 15–29 and 30-60 ml/min respectively. For monitoring, peak anti-Xa levels are suggested. Data lack whether this results in therapeutic anti-Xa levels or in anti-Xa levels that are comparable to those of patients without renal impairment. AimsTo determine dose ranges in patients with renal impairment that result in therapeutic anti-Xa levels and to determine the percentage of the 86 IU/kg dose that results in anti-Xa levels normally occurring in patients without renal impairment. MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted in five hospitals. Patients ≥18 years of age, with an eGFR ≥ 15 ml/min were included. The first correctly sampled peak (i.e. 3-5 h after ≥ third administration, regardless of dose per patient) was included. Simulated prediction models were developed using multiple linear regression. Results770 patients were included. eGFR and hospital affected the association between dose and anti-Xa level. The doses for peak anti-Xa levels of 0.75 IU/ml differed substantially between hospitals and ranged from 55 to 91, 65–359 and 68-168 IU/kg in eGFR 15–29, 30–60 and > 60 ml/min/1.73m2, respectively. In eGFR 15–29 and 30-60 ml/min/1.73m2, doses of 75 % and 91 % of 86 IU/kg respectively, were needed for anti-Xa levels normally occurring in patients with eGFR > 60 ml/min. ConclusionWe advise against anti-Xa based dose-adjustments as long as anti-Xa assays between laboratories are not harmonized and an anti-Xa target range is not validated. A better approach might be to target levels similar to eGFR > 60 ml/min/1.73m2, which are achieved by smaller dose reductions.

Inadequate prophylaxis in patients with trauma: anti-Xa-guided enoxaparin dosing management in critically ill patients with trauma

IntroductionVenous thromboembolism (VTE) causes significant morbidity in patients with trauma despite advances in pharmacologic therapy. Prior literature suggests standard enoxaparin dosing may not achieve target prophylactic anti-Xa levels. We hypothesize...

Is the current therapeutic dosage of nadroparin adequate for neonates and infants under 8 months with thromboembolic disease? a population pharmacokinetic study from a national children's medical center.

Objectives: Nadroparin, a low-molecular-weight-heparin is commonly used off-label in neonates and infants for thromboembolic events prevention. However, the recommended dosing regimen often fails to achieve therapeutic target ranges. This study aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model of nadroparin to determine an appropriate dosing regimen for neonates and infants less than 8 months. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients treated with nadroparin at Children's Hospital of Fudan University between July 2021 and December 2023. A population PK model was developed using anti-Xa levels, and its predictive performance was evaluated internally. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to design an initial dosing schedule targeting anti-Xa levels between 0.5 and 1IU/mL. Results: A total of 40 neonates and infants aged less than 8 months with gestational age ranging from 25 to 41 weeks treated with nadroparin were enrolled in the study for analysis. A one-compartment PK model with first order absorption and elimination was adequately fitted to the data. Creatinine clearance was identified as a significant factor contributing to inter-individual variability in clearance. The typical population parameter estimates of clearance, distribution volume and absorption rate in this population were 0.211L/h, 1.55L and 0.495h-1, respectively. Our findings suggest that current therapeutic doses of nadroparin (150-200IU/kg q12h) may result in subtherapeutic exposure, thus higher doses might be required. Conclusion: The present study offers the first estimation of PK parameters for nadroparin in preterm or term neonates and infants less than 8 months utilizing the model. Our findings have potential implications for recommending initial personalized dosages, particularly among patient populations exhibiting similar characteristics.

Antithrombin Levels and Heparin Responsiveness during Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Prospective Single-center Cohort Study.

Unfractionated heparin, administered during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation to prevent thromboembolic events, largely depends on plasma antithrombin for its antithrombotic effects. Decreased heparin responsiveness seems frequent on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; however, its association with acquired antithrombin deficiency is poorly understood. The objective of this study was to describe longitudinal changes in plasma antithrombin levels during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support and evaluate the association between antithrombin levels and heparin responsiveness. The hypothesis was that extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support would be associated with acquired antithrombin deficiency and related decreased heparin responsiveness. Adults receiving venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were prospectively included. All patients received continuous intravenous unfractionated heparin using a standardized protocol (target anti-Xa 0.3 to 0.5 IU/ml). For each patient, arterial blood was withdrawn into citrate-containing tubes at 11 time points (from hour 0 up to day 7). Anti-Xa (without dextran or antithrombin added) and antithrombin levels were measured. The primary outcome was the antithrombin plasma level. In the absence of consensus, antithrombin deficiency was defined as a time-weighted average of antithrombin less than or equal to 70%. Data regarding clinical management and heparin dosage were collected. Fifty patients, including 42% postcardiotomy, were included between April 2020 and May 2021, with a total of 447 samples. Median extracorporeal membrane oxygenation duration was 7 (interquartile range, 4 to 12) days. Median antithrombin level was 48% (37 to 60%) at baseline. Antithrombin levels significantly increased throughout the follow-up. Time-weighted average of antithrombin levels was 63% (57 to 73%) and was less than or equal to 70% in 32 (64%) of patients. Overall, 45 (90%) patients had at least one antithrombin value less than 70%, and 35 (70%) had at least one antithrombin value less than 50%. Antithrombin levels were not significantly associated with heparin responsiveness evaluated by anti-Xa assay or heparin dosage. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support was associated with a moderate acquired antithrombin deficiency, mainly during the first 72 h, that did not correlate with heparin responsiveness.

Enoxaparin for VTE thromboprophylaxis during inpatient rehabilitation care: assessment of the standard fixed dosing regimen

BackgroundWe aimed to examine the efficiency of fixed daily dose enoxaparin (40 mg) thromboprophylaxis strategy for patients undergoing inpatient rehabilitation.MethodsThis was an observational, prospective, cohort study that included 63 hospitalized patients undergoing rehabilitative treatment following sub-acute ischemic stroke (SAIS) or spinal cord injury (SCI), with an indication for thromboprophylaxis. Anti-Xa level measured three hours post-drug administration (following three consecutive days of enoxaparin treatment or more) was utilised to assess in vivo enoxaparin activity. An anti-Xa level between 0.2-0.5 U/ml was considered evidence of effective antithrombotic activity.ResultsWe found sub-prophylactic levels of anti-Xa (<0.2 U/ml) in 19% (12/63). Results were within the recommended prophylactic range (0.2-0.5 U/ml) in 73% (46/63) and were supra-prophylactic (>0.5 U/ml) in 7.9% (5/63) of patients. Anti-Xa levels were found to inversely correlate with patients’ weight and renal function as defined by creatinine clearance (CrCl) (p<0.05).ConclusionsOur study confirmed that a one-size-fits-all approach for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis may be inadequate for rehabilitation patient populations. The efficacy of fixed-dose enoxaparin prophylaxis is limited and may be influenced by renal function and weight. This study suggests that anti-Xa studies and prophylactic enoxaparin dose adjustments should be considered in certain patients, such as those who are underweight, overweight and or have suboptimal renal function.Trial registrationNo. NCT103593291, registered August 2018.

Predictors of direct oral anticoagulant concentrations in the trauma population

IntroductionDirect oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use is becoming more prevalent in patients presenting after trauma. We sought to identify the prevalence and predictors of subtherapeutic and therapeutic DOAC concentrations and hypothesized...

International Normalized Ratio Predicts Recurrence and Bleeding in Patients With Acute Venous Thromboembolism Who Undergo Direct Oral Anticoagulants.

Prothrombin time/international normalized ratio (PT/INR) is related to both antithrombotic effect and risk of bleeding. Its role in the prediction of venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence and bleeding for patients with acute VTE who undergo direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) treatment is unclear, despite previous studies revealed some association between them. The predictive efficiency of INR for VTE recurrence and bleeding were analyzed in a retrospective cohort with VTE patients who underwent DOACs treatment. Then its predictive efficiency for VTE recurrence and bleeding were validated in a prospective cohort with the acquired cutoffs range, and compared with anti-Xa level, DASH and VTE-BLEED scores. In the retrospective cohort (n = 1083), the sensitivity and specificity of INR for the prediction of VTE recurrence were 79.4% and 92.8%, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.881 (0.803-0.960)(P = .025). The cutoff value of INR was 0.9. The sensitivity and specificity of INR for the prediction of bleeding were 85.7% and 77.9%, respectively. The AUC was 0.876 (0.786-0.967)(P < .001). The cutoff value of INR was 2.1. In the prospective cohort (n = 202), the calibration showed that there were 4 (50%) patients with VTE recurrence, 156 (97.5%) patients with non-recurrence and bleeding (non-R&B), and 20 (58.8%) patients with bleeding in the low (INR < 0.9)(n = 8), intermediate (0.9 ≤ INR ≤ 2.1)(n = 160), and high (INR > 2.1)(n = 34) groups, respectively. The baseline PT/INR value at the initiation of DOACs treatment is an independent predictor for VTE recurrence and bleeding in patients with acute VTE who undergo DOACs treatment.

Anti-Xa Monitoring of Apixaban (ZyQuis) in Venous Thrombo-Embolism and Atrial Fibrillation.

Apixaban is a direct oral Xa inhibitor and is indicated for the treatment of venous thrombo-embolism (VTE) and prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation (AF). Recently, a generic (ZyQuis, Zydus Lifesciences Limited, India) has received Food and Drug Administration approval. While bioequivalence has been demonstrated with Eliquis (Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer, UK), it is necessary to monitor its effectiveness prior to acceptance in medical practice. This prospective study independently evaluated Apixaban (ZyQuis) at two accredited laboratories. Participants were converted from Warfarin or Rivaroxaban to Apixaban 5 mg bd for a duration of one month. Peak anti-Xa levels were measured 3-4 h post the morning dose. The samples were processed on the Atellica COAG 360 (Siemens Healthineers, Marburg, Germany) analyzers with a chromogenic anti-Xa assay (Innovance, reference interval 69-321 ng/mL). There were 26 participants; 5 men, 21 women; mean ± standard deviation age of 46 ± 12 years. Indications for anticoagulation included: VTE (88.5%) and AF (11.5%). 69.2% of the participants had at least one comorbidity. 96.2% of the anti-Xa levels were within the laboratory's 95% reference interval. Mean anti-Xa activity was 191 ± 69 ng/mL and 186 ± 68 ng/mL measured at respective laboratories. Mean differences in anti-Xa measurements represented by Bland-Altman statistics were small (bias of -2.6%, 95% confidence interval -1.11 to -4.09) and a strong correlation was observed on Deming regression analysis (0.995). Apixaban (ZyQuis) was effective for the management of VTE and AF as evidenced by anti-Xa activity.

How enoxaparin underdosing and sex contribute to achieving therapeutic anti-Xa levels.

Anti-Xa serves as a clinical surrogate for assessing the efficacy and bleeding risk in patients treated with enoxaparin for thromboembolic events. Evidence from the literature and empirical observations suggest that patients are underdosed in clinical practice to avoid bleeding complications. This study aimed to investigate such underdosing of enoxaparin and its potential impact on achieving therapeutic anti-Xa levels. This multicentric, retrospective, observational study included patients with acute ischemic stroke due to atrial fibrillation. All patients received enoxaparin in the therapeutic setting with subsequent anti-Xa measurements. The one-sample, one-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to identify a significant difference between the doses administered and the recommended daily dose. Logistic regression model analysis was performed to identify additional predictors affecting achievement of the therapeutic anti-Xa target range. Stepwise forward-backward selection with Akaike's information criterion as metric was applied to refine the logistic regression model. A total of 145 patients from the university hospitals of St. Pölten and Tulln in Lower Austria were included. The median daily enoxaparin dose administered was 1.23mg/kg, resulting in an overall target range achievement rate of 66%. As compared to recommended therapeutic doses, significant underdosing of enoxaparin was evident in both participating centers (p < 0.001). The calculated threshold dose to achieve the therapeutic target range with a 90% probability was 1.5mg/kg enoxaparin daily. Female sex was found to be a strong independent predictor of achieving a therapeutic target range (OR 9.44; 95% CI 3.40-30.05, p < 0.001). Despite the underdosing observed in both centers, therapeutic anti-Xa levels were achieved with lower than recommended doses of enoxaparin, and women required even lower doses than men. These findings warrant further confirmation by prospective studies.

Standardization of Anti-Xa Assay and its Comparison with Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time for Monitoring Unfractionated Heparin Therapy.

Monitoring of anticoagulant activity of unfractionated heparin (UFH) is primarily done with activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), which is affected by many factors. Anti-Xa assays are considered to overcome these factors and may provide a better method for monitoring patients on UFH with a narrow therapeutic range. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of aPTT and anti-Xa assays in UFH monitoring. A prospective non-randomized study was carried out in two stages: first, the anti-Xa assay was standardized using kit instructions; each sample was then analyzed by both tests. The outcomes of the two assays were compared and assessed for agreement of maintaining therapeutic anticoagulant levels. These levels for anti-Xa assay were between 0.3 and 0.7IU/ml, while it was 1.5-2.5 times the control for aPTT assay. Below this range was regarded as subtherapeutic, and above this as supratherapeutic. A total of 90 samples were tested and analyzed using both assays. Most of them (> 70%) were noted to be in subtherapeutic levels with both tests. The overall concordance was 73.3%, and the estimated kappa value was 0.483 (0.396-0.57). The correlation between aPTT and anti-Xa assay was 0.74 (p < 0.001). With anti-Xa levels in the therapeutic range, aPTT levels were in subtherapeutic in 60% and supratherapeutic in 13.3% cases. Although both the testing strategies had a good agreement and correlation, discordance was observed in interpretative values with anti-Xa levels in therapeutic range and aPTT levels in non-therapeutic range. Its clinical implications need to be evaluated further in future studies.

Urine-based point-of-care testing for factor-Xa-inhibitors in acute ischemic stroke patients: a feasibility study.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have become widely used in clinical practice for preventing thromboembolic events. Point-of-care testing methods, particularly those based on urine samples, offer a promising approach for rapid and accurate assessment of DOAC presence. This pilot study aims to evaluate the utility of a urine-based DOAC dipstick test as a point-of-care tool for identifying DOAB presence in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) or transient ischemic attack (TIA) patients. This prospective pilot study included patients with AIS/TIA eligible for DOAC-measurement. After exclusion of 3 patients, 23 patients with DOAC-intake (DOAC group; factor-Xa-inhibitors; n = 23) and 21 patients without DOAC-intake (control-group) remained for analyses. The urine-based DOAC dipstick test and parallel blood-based specific DOAC-level assessment were performed in all patients. Time-intervals of sampling urine/blood sampling and result of DOAC-test were recorded to analyze a potential time benefit based on dipstick evaluation. The urine-based DOAC dipstick test demonstrated high sensitivity (100%) and specificity (100%), correctly identifying all patients with anticoagulatory activity due to DOAC intake (i.e., anti-Xalevel ≥30 ng/mL). Moreover, the visual readout of the test provided semiquantitative information on drug-specific anti-Xa levels, showing a sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 93% to detect anti-Xa levels ≥120 ng/mL. The dipstick test exhibited a median time-benefit of 2:25 h compared to standard blood-based DOAC-level testing. The results of this pilot study underline the efficacy of urine-based point-of-care testing as a rapid and reliable method for assessing DOAC presence in patients with acute ischemic stroke. The value of this tool for clinical decision-making in stroke management needs to be established in future trials.Clinical Trial Registration: Clinicaltrails.org identifier [NCT06037200].

Development of a Rapid Qualitative Screen for Anticoagulant Presence.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and fondaparinux with stable pharmacokinetics are commonly used anticoagulants for outpatient care. Due to the lack of monitoring requirements, drug-specific assays are not available in most hospital laboratories, but drug levels are needed in some urgent/emergency situations. This study describes the development of a qualitative screen for the presence of DOAC or fondaparinux using coagulation tests found in most laboratories. The DOAC screen is composed of a heparin anti-Xa activity assay and thrombin time (TT) assay. The STA®-Liquid-Anti-Xa assay calibrated with Stago Multi Hep® and STA®-TT were run on STA-R Max® analyzers. The anti-Xa activity and TT assays were repeated 5 times in samples of commercially available calibrators and controls for each drug: fondaparinux, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban. Statistical analysis and correlations were performed for anti-Xa activity and TT results for each drug and pooled normal plasma. A significant correlation was found between heparin-calibrated anti-Xa levels and fondaparinux, rivaroxaban, apixiban, and edoxaban (r2 = 0.99-1.0). Dabigatran showed a strong linear correlation (r2 = 0.99) with TT. Anti-Xa levels >0.3 IU/mL and TT >25 seconds were determined as cutoffs at our lab for the detection of clinically relevant drug levels of factor Xa inhibitor and direct thrombin inhibitor, respectively. Our study demonstrates that commonly available heparin anti-Xa activity and TT assays can be used to qualitatively detect DOACs and fondaparinux and provides a method to establish a qualitative interpretation.

Anti-factor Xa as the preferred assay to monitor heparin for the treatment of pulmonary embolism.

The mainstay of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) treatment is anticoagulation. Timely anticoagulation correlates with decreased PE-associated mortality, but the ability to achieve a therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) with unfractionated heparin (UFH) remains limited. Although some institutions have switched to a more accurate and reproducible test to assess for heparin's effectiveness, the anti-factor Xa (antiXa) assay, data correlating a timely therapeutic antiXa to PE-associated clinical outcomes remains scarce. We evaluated time to a therapeutic antiXa using intravenous heparin after PE response team (PERT) activation and assessed clinical outcomes including bleeding and recurrent thromboembolic events. This was a retrospective cohort study at NYU Langone Health. All adult patients ≥18 years with a confirmed PE started on IV UFH with >2 antiXa levels were included. Patients were excluded if they received thrombolysis or alternative anticoagulation. The primary endpoint was the time to a therapeutic antiXa level of 0.3-0.7 units/mL. Secondary outcomes included recurrent thromboembolism, bleeding and PE-associated mortality within 3 months. A total of 330 patients with a PERT consult were identified with 192 patients included. The majority of PEs were classified as sub massive (64.6%) with 87% of patients receiving a bolus of 80 units/kg of UFH prior to starting an infusion at 18 units/kg/hour. The median time to the first therapeutic antiXa was 9.13 hours with 93% of the cohort sustaining therapeutic anticoagulation at 48 hours. Recurrent thromboembolism, bleeding and mortality occurred in 1%, 5% and 6.2%, respectively. Upon univariate analysis, a first antiXa <0.3 units/ml was associated with an increased risk of mortality [27.78% (5/18) vs 8.05% (14/174), p = 0.021]. We observed a low incidence of recurrent thromboembolism or PE-associated mortality utilizing an antiXa titrated UFH protocol. The use of an antiXa based heparin assay to guide heparin dosing and monitoring allows for timely and sustained therapeutic anticoagulation for treatment of PE.