anti-VEGF Group Research Articles

Short-Term Outcomes of Trabeculectomy With or Without Anti-VEGF in Patients With Neovascular Glaucoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of trabeculectomy alone or combined with intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents for the treatment of neovascular glaucoma. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the effects of trabeculectomy alone or combined with intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF agents for the treatment of neovascular glaucoma. We searched four databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science) up to January 2023 and extracted data on three surgical outcomes: postoperative intraocular pressure, success rate and complications. We used a random-effects model to calculate pooled relative risk (RR) or standardized mean difference (SMD) estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assessed publication bias using Begg and Egger tests. We included seven studies with 353 eyes. Compared to trabeculectomy alone, trabeculectomy with anti-VEGF had a lower risk of postoperative complications (RR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.41-0.89) and higher success rate (RR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.02-1.40). The intraocular pressure reduction was significantly greater in the trabeculectomy with anti-VEGF augmentation group than the trabeculectomy group from 1 week (SMD, -1.36; 95% CI, -2.76 to 0.04) to 6months (SMD, -0.79; 95% CI, -1.50 to -0.07) after surgery. According to current evidence, adding intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF agents to trabeculectomy may improve the short time outcomes of patients with neovascular glaucoma.

Comparability of input parameters in the German Retina.net ROP registry and the EU-ROP registry - An exemplary comparison between 2011 and 2021.

The German Retina.net ROP registry and its Europe-wide successor, the EU-ROP registry, collect data from patients treated for ROP. This analysis compares input parameters of these two registries to establish a procedure for joint analyses of different registry data using exemplary datasets from the two registries. Exemplary datasets from the two databases over a 1-year period each (German Retina.net ROP Registry, 2011, 22 infants; EU-ROP Registry, 2021, 44 infants) were compared. The parameters documented in the two databases were aligned and analysed regarding demographic parameters, treatment modalities, complications within first 24 h and retreatments. The current analysis showed that data can be aligned for joint analyses with some adjustments within the data structure. The registry with more detailed data collection (EU-ROP) needs to be reduced regarding granularity in order to align the different registries, as the registry with lower granularity determines the level of analyses that can be performed in a comparative approach. In the exemplary datasets, we observed that the overall most common ROP severity in both registries was zone II, 3+ (2011: 70.5%; 2021: 65%), with decreasing numbers of clock hours showing preretinal neovascularisations (2011: 10-12 clock hours in 29% of cases, 2021: 4-6 clock hours in 38%). The most prevalent treatment method was laser coagulation in 2011 (75%) and anti-VEGF therapy in 2021 (86.1%). Within the anti-VEGF group, all patients were treated with bevacizumab in 2011 and with ranibizumab in 2021. Retreatment rates were comparable in 2011 and 2021. Data from two different ROP registries can be aligned and jointly analysed. The analysis reveals a paradigm shift in treatment modalities, from predominantly laser to anti-VEGF, and within the anti-VEGF group from bevacizumab to ranibizumab in Germany. In addition, there was a trend towards earlier treatment in 2021.

Harnessing tumor immunity with cytotoxics: T cells monitoring in mice bearing lung tumors treated with anti-VEGF and pemetrexed-cisplatin doublet.

Successful immunotherapy is restricted to some cancers only, and combinatorial strategies with other drugs could help to improve their efficacy. Here, we monitor T cells in NSCLC model after treatment with cytotoxics (CT) and anti-VEGF drugs, to understand when immune checkpoint inhibitors should be best associated next. In vivo study was performed on BALB/c mice grafted with KLN205 cells. Eight treatments were tested including control, cisplatin and pemetrexed as low (LD CT) and full (MTD CT) dose as single agents, flat dose anti-VEGF and the association anti-VEGF + CT. Full immunomonitoring was performed by flow cytometry on tumor, spleen and blood over 3 weeks. Immunomodulatory effect was dependent upon both treatments and time. In tumors, combination groups shown numerical lower Treg cells on Day 21. In spleen, anti-VEGF and LD CT group shown higher CD8/Treg ratio on Day 7; on Day 14, higher T CD4 were observed in both combination groups. Finally, in blood, Tregs were lower and CD8/Treg ratio higher, on Day 14 in both combination groups. On Day 21, CD4 and CD8 T cells were higher in the anti-VEGF + MTD CT group. Anti-VEGF associated to CT triggers notable increase in CD8/Tregs ratio. Regarding the scheduling, a two-week delay after using anti-VEGF and CT could be the best sequence to optimize antitumor efficacy.

Caspase-9 inhibition confers stronger neuronal and vascular protection compared to VEGF neutralization in a mouse model of retinal vein occlusion.

Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is a sight-threatening condition typically treated with intravitreal injection of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antagonists. Treatment response to anti-VEGF therapies is highly variable, with poor visual outcomes and treatment response in patients with significant retinal nonperfusion following RVO. Recently, caspase-9 has been identified as a potent regulator of edema, gliosis, and neuronal dysfunction during acute retinal hypoxia. The purpose of this study was to compare the therapeutic effect of caspase-9 inhibition against VEGF-neutralization in an established mouse model of RVO. Adult male C57Bl/6 J mice were randomized to induction of RVO and treatment with either vehicle, intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF antibody, topical administration of a selective caspase-9 inhibitor (Pen1-XBir3), or a combination therapy. Animals were followed on days 1, 2, and 8 after RVO with fundus retinal imaging, and with optical coherence tomography (OCT) to capture retinal swelling, capillary nonperfusion (measured by disorganization of retinal inner layers, DRIL), hyperreflective foci (HRF), and retinal atrophy. Focal electroretinography (ERG) measurements were performed on day 7. Histology was performed on retinal sections from day 8. Both VEGF neutralization and caspase-9 inhibition showed significant retinal protection from RVO compared to vehicle treatment arm. Retinal reperfusion of occluded veins was accelerated in eyes receiving caspase-9 inhibitor, but not significantly different from vehicle in the anti-VEGF group. Retinal edema was suppressed in all treatment groups, with approximately 2-fold greater edema reduction with caspase-9 inhibition compared to VEGF neutralization. HRF were reduced similarly across all treatment groups compared to vehicle. Retinal detachment was reduced only in eyes treated with caspase-9 inhibitor monotherapy. Caspase-9 inhibition reduced retinal atrophy and preserved ERG response; VEGF neutralization did not prevent neurodegeneration following RVO. Caspase-9 inhibition confers stronger neuronal and vascular protection compared to VEGF neutralization in the mouse laser-induced model of RVO.

Risk of retinal vein occlusion in colorectal cancer patients receiving anti-vascular endothelial growth factors – a population-based cohort study

BackgroundAnti−vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) treatment has been associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events. Therefore, the use of anti−VEGFs for patients with colorectal cancers (CRC) has raised concerns about the potential risk of retinal vein occlusion (RVO), an ocular disease caused by embolism or venous stasis. This study aims to evaluate the risk of RVO in patients with CRC treated with anti−VEGFs.MethodWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Taiwan Cancer Registry and National Health Insurance Database. The study cohort comprised patients newly diagnosed with CRC between 2011 and 2017, who received anti-VEGF treatment. For each patient in the study cohort, a control group comprising four patients newly diagnosed with CRC, but not receiving anti-VEGF treatment, was randomly selected. A washout period of 12 months was implemented to identify new cases. The index date was defined as the date of the first prescription of anti-VEGF drugs. The study outcome was the incidence of RVO, as identified by ICD-9-CM (362.35 and 362.36) or ICD-10-CM codes (H3481 and H3483). Patients were followed from their index date until the occurrence of RVO, death or the end of the study period. Covariates, including patients' age at index date, sex, calendar year of CRC diagnosis, stage of CRC and comorbidities related to RVO, were included. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with adjustments for all covariates to compare the risk of RVO between the anti-VEGF and control groups.ResultsWe recruited 6285 patients in the anti-VEGF group and 37,250 patients in the control group, with mean ages of 59.49 ± 12.11 and 63.88 ± 13.17 years, respectively. The incidence rates were 1.06 per 1000 person-years for the anti-VEGF group, and 0.63 per 1000 person-years for the controls. There was no statistically significant difference in RVO risk between the anti-VEGF and control groups (HR: 2.21, 95% CI: 0.87–5.61).ConclusionOur results indicated no association between use of anti-VEGF and occurrence of RVO among CRC patients, although the crude incidence rate of RVO was higher in patients receiving anti-VEGF, compared to control patients. Future study with larger sample size is required to confirm our findings.

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factors in combination with vitrectomy for complications of proliferative diabetic retinopathy.

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factors in combination with vitrectomy for complications of proliferative diabetic retinopathy.

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for neovascular glaucoma.

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for neovascular glaucoma.

NEURODEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOMES AFTER ANTI-VEGF TREATMENT FOR RETINOPATHY OF PREMATURITY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Introduction: The objective of this study was to assess the neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants who have undergone intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF), either as monotherapy or in combination with laser therapy, for treatment of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Secondary, efficacy of anti-VEGF was also evaluated.
 Methods: Literature search was conducted using 7 online databases (CENTRAL, PubMed, ScienceDirect, SCOPUS, EBSCO, ProQuest, and JSTOR). Studies were selected based on the established inclusion and exclusion criteria. Primary outcomes were neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI), severe NDI (sNDI), neurodevelopmental scores, and cerebral palsy (CP) incidence. Secondary outcomes included impairment and severe impairment of each domain (motor, cognitive, and language) and retreatment of ROP.
 Result: Seventeen studies were included. Random-effects model meta-analysis showed no differences were observed between anti-VEGF compared to control group in NDI (unadjusted odds ratio (uOR) 1.28; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.85 to 1.94), sNDI (uOR 1.33; 95% CI 0.92 to 1.93), and CP outcomes . Meta-analysis showed insignificant result with lower overall scores, motor, cognitive, and language domains associated with anti-VEGF treatment. Secondary outcomes showed inferior cognitive impairment (OR 1.41; 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.92) and higher retreatment rate (OR 47.55; 95% CI: 12.35 to 183.09) in anti-VEGF group.
 Conclusion: There were no differences in neurodevelopmental outcomes between anti-VEGF and control group. Despite not causing any adverse neurodevelopmental effect, clinicians should carefully weigh the benefits and risks of anti-VEGF injection for treating infants with ROP, since it has higher retreatment rate.

Immune-related interstitial lung disease induced by different immune checkpoint inhibitors regimens: A real-world study from 2014 to 2022 based on FAERS databases

This study further approaches immune-related interstitial lung disease adverse event in patients undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy, ICI plus chemotherapy and ICI plus anti-VEGF therapy in the postmarketing period. Reports for ICI-related interstitial lung disease adverse event from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database between 2014 and 2022 were analysed in this study. The reporting odds ratio (ROR) and Bayesian confidence propagation neural networks of information components (IC) were computed to identify disproportionate reporting of ICI-related interstitial lung disease. 44,964,609 records were extracted from the FAERS database, with 9150 records for interstitial lung disease after ICI treatment. Men had a slightly higher reporting frequency than women (63.07% vs. 25.69%). The morbidity rate (2.05%) of acute respiratory distress syndrome was low, the fatality rate (67.55%) was the highest, the time to onset was relatively short. Within 3 months, the cumulative proportion of ICI-related interstitial lung disease records was 75.03%. The ICI plus anti-VEGF therapy group had the lowest frequency of interstitial lung disease adverse events compared to the ICI monotherapy group and the ICI plus chemotherapy group (IC025 = 1.72, IC025 = 3.21, IC025 = 3.22). Moreover, ICI plus anti-VEGF therapy group had the narrowest spectrum of interstitial lung disease among these three therapeutic regimens. This study showed substantial characteristics of a spectrum of interstitial lung disease adverse events after different ICI regimens. Notably, ICI plus anti-VEGF therapy might be a treatment method that can to some extent control ICI-related interstitial lung disease. These data provide some important information for clinicians to weigh the risks and benefits of different ICI regimens.

Anti-VEGF and Anti-EGFR Antibody Therapy on T-Cell Infiltration and TCR Variation in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Chemotherapy combined with anti-EGFR or anti-VEGF monoclonal antibodies (mAb) is widely used to treat patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Here, we investigated the effects of these antibodies on T-cell infiltration and T-cell receptor (TCR) repertoire variation in CRC liver metastases. Ten patients with mCRC received chemotherapy in combination with anti-EGFR (n=6) or anti-VEGF (n=4) mAb. T-cell infiltration was examined for CD3 and CD8 by carrying out immunohistochemistry on biopsy or surgical specimens from liver metastases before and after treatment. TCR repertoire analysis was carried out on specimens with post-treatment CD3+ T-cell infiltration. T-cell infiltrations were approximately 83% (5/6) and 50% (2/4), following treatment with anti-EGFR or anti-VEGF mAb, respectively. TCR repertoire analysis revealed higher clonality and lower diversity of TCR alpha and beta (TRA and TRB) in the anti-VEGF mAb group than that in the anti-EGFR group mAb. Furthermore, the percentage of the common TCR clones between infiltrating T cells and T cells in peripheral blood was significantly lower in the anti-VEGF mAb group compared to that in the anti-EGFR mAb group. The population of T cells infiltrating liver metastases in the anti-VEGF mAb group differed from that in the anti-EGFR mAb group.

Chinese Herbal Medicine Combined with Intravitreal Antivascular Growth Factor Agents in Treatment of Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is the second most common retinal vascular disease in the world after diabetic retinopathy. Moreover, macular edema (ME) is the main cause of visual impairment in RVO patients. Intravitreal injection of antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents is recommended for RVO-ME. However, repeated injections severely limit their efficacy. Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) is widely used in RVO-ME as adjuvant therapy in China. The study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-VEGF combined with CHM for RVO-ME and to provide reliable evidence for clinical application. Seven databases were searched without language or publication status restrictions. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing anti-VEGF combined with CHM (anti-VEGF + CHM) versus anti-VEGF in participants with RVO-ME were included in this study. The "risk of bias assessment tool" of the Cochrane Handbook was applied to assess the quality of included trials, and RevMan 5.3 software was used for data analysis. A total of 10 relevant trials with 743 patients were identified. The results showed that BCVA of the anti-VEGF + CHM group significantly improved at 3 months (P < 0.00001), 6 months (P=0.008), and 12 months (P=0.01), and CMT significantly reduced at 1 month (P=0.02), 2 months (P=0.0009), 3 months (P < 0.05), 6 months (P < 0.0001), and 12 months (P < 0.00001) compared with the anti-VEGF group alone. At the same time, the anti-VEGF + CHM group has a better performance in reducing the number of injections (P < 0.05) and improving the total effective rate (P < 0.0001). However, regarding adverse events, there was no statistical difference between the two groups (P=0.09). Our results provide promising evidence that anti-VEGF therapy combined with CHM may be more beneficial to patients than anti-VEGF therapy alone. However, because of the low quality and small sample size of the included studies, more rigorous and larger-scale trials were necessary to validate our results. Registration Number. CRD42021270262.

Risk of Thromboembolic Events and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Following Antivascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy in Patients with Colorectal Cancer

Antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy has been a standard treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. However, the risk of thromboembolic events and cardiovascular events associated with this therapy remains controversial. We assessed whether anti-VEGF therapy increases the risk of thromboembolic events or major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in patients with colorectal cancer based on real-world evidence. This retrospective cohort study was designed using linked 2009-2016 nationwide databases, including the Taiwan Cancer Registry, the National Health Insurance Research Database, and Taiwan's National Death Index. In total, 189,708 patients newly diagnosed as having advanced colorectal cancer from 2009 to 2016 were identified and categorized into the anti-VEGF and comparator groups through age, sex, clinical stage, and diagnosis date (within 180 days) matching. Propensity score matching was further performed to balance the baseline characteristics between the two groups. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to create the cumulative incidence curves of thromboembolic events and MACEs, and log-rank tests were used to compare the differences in Kaplan-Meier curves. Competing hazard ratios (HRs) for thromboembolic events and MACEs were estimated using the Fine-Gray method when considering the competing event of death. Statistical analysis was performed using two-tailed tests with a significance level of 0.05. In total, 4635 patients were included in both the anti-VEGF group and comparator group. The risk of thromboembolic events and MACEs did not differ significantly between the two groups. After propensity score matching, the adjusted HR for MACEs or thromboembolic events was 1.040, which for MACEs was 0.989, and that for thromboembolic events was 1.028. The competing HR for MACEs or thromboembolic events was 0.921, which for MACEs, was 0.862, and that for thromboembolic events was 0.908. In conclusion, patients with advanced colorectal cancer who received anti-VEGF therapy did not exhibit significantly higher risks of thromboembolic events and MACEs than those without anti-VEGF therapy. Our study provides real-world evidence regarding the safety of anti-VEGF therapy in Asian patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Efficacy and effectiveness of anti-VEGF or steroids monotherapy versus combination treatment for macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundRetinal vein occlusion (RVO) is the main cause of retinal vascular blindness. Laser photocoagulation therapy is the regarded as the standard treatment for branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) in the guidelines, but it is not effective for macular edema (ME) secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). As anti-VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) or steroids monotherapy has been used to treat RVO, but each has its advantages and disadvantages. Our purpose was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intraocular injection of anti-VEGF combined with steroids versus anti-VEGF or steroids monotherapy for ME secondary to RVO.MethodsWe systematically searched trials on Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) for RCTs (random clinical trials) or non-RCTs, comparing anti-VEGF or steroids monotherapy to their combination. The primary outcomes were changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT) and intraocular pressure (IOP). The pooled data was analyzed by random effects model.FindingsA total of 10 studies selected from 366 studies were included in this meta-analysis. Our results favored anti-VEGF with steroids combination therapy in comparison with anti-VEGF {pooled SMD (standardized mean difference), 95% CI, -0.16 [-0.28, -0.04], P = 0.01} or steroids (pooled SMD, 95% CI, -0.56 [-0.73, -0.40], P < 0.00001) alone on changes of BCVA. Compared with anti-VEGF monotherapy group, the combination therapy also had a better effect {pooled MD (mean difference), 95% CI, -9.62 [-17.31, -1.93], P = 0.01)} at improvements on CMT. On the changes of IOP, assessment favored that combination therapy was associated with a better relief of IOP compared to steroids monotherapy group (pooled MD, 95% CI, -5.93 [-7.87, -3.99],P < 0.00001). What’s more, the incidence of ocular hypertension was lower in the combined treatment group compared with control group treated with steroids alone (Odds Ratio, 95% CI, 0.21 [0.06, 0.77], P = 0.02). Results also showed that the combination group can prolong the average time to first anti-VEGF reinjection (MD, 95% CI, 1.74 [0.57, 2.90], P = 0.003) compared to control group treated with anti-VEGF alone.ConclusionAnti-VEGF with steroids combination treatment can enable a better achievement of improving BCVA, CMT, reducing the risk of increased IOP and improving patient prognosis compared to anti-VEGF or steroids therapy alone, lengthening the average time to anti-VEGF reinjection with reducing the injections during follow-up.

Relationship Between Macular Thickness and Visual Acuity in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema With Anti-VEGF Therapy: Systematic Review.

To examine the relationship between central macular thickness (CMT) measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and visual acuity (VA) in patients with center-involving diabetic macular edema (DME) receiving antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment. Peer-reviewed articles from 2016 to 2020 reporting intravitreal injections of bevacizumab, ranibizumab, or aflibercept that provided data on pretreatment (baseline) and final retinal thickness (CMT) and visual acuity (VA) were identified. The relationship between relative changes was assessed via a linear random-effects regression model controlling for treatment group. No significant association between the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) VA and CMT was found in 41 eligible studies evaluating 2667 eyes. The observed effect estimate was a 0.12 increase (95% CI, -0.124 to 2.47) in logMAR VA per 100 µm reduction in CMT after treatment change. There were no significant differences in logMAR VA between the anti-VEGF treatment groups. There was no statistically significant relationship between the change in logMAR VA and change in CMT as well as no significant effect of the type of anti-VEGF treatment on the change in logMAR VA. Although OCT analysis, including measurements of CMT, will continue to be an integral part of the management of DME, further exploration is needed on additional anatomic factors that might contribute to visual outcomes.

Observation, laser photocoagulation or anti-VEGF therapy in the management of retinal arterial macroaneurysms

BackgroundTo explore the efficacy of observation, laser photocoagulation, and anti-VEGF in the management of retinal arterial macroaneurysm (RAM).MethodsWe retrospectively included patients diagnosed with RAM at the Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH) from 2003 to 2021, and comprehensively reviewed cases documented in the literature from multiple databases (PROSPERO protocol CRD42022310417). Patients were categorized into 3 groups: the observation group, anti-VEGF group, and laser photocoagulation group. LogMAR visual acuity (VA) and central retinal thickness (CMT) at the end of the follow-up were analyzed.ResultsA total of 14 patients from the PUMCH and 210 patients from the literature review were included. VA and CMT in patients who underwent observation, laser photocoagulation, and anti-VEGF therapies were significantly improved from baseline (p < 0.05), with changes in LogMAR VA improved by -0.34 ± 0.68, -0.17 ± 0.58, and -0.45 ± 0.62 and changes in CMT improved by -148.26 ± 138.99 µm, -185.61 ± 130.37 µm, and -287.45 ± 171.87 µm, respectively. Subgroup analysis revealed that anti-VEGF therapy was used in patients with worse VA than patients who underwent laser photocoagulation (p = 0.010), but achieved better improvement in VA than the laser photocoagulation group (p = 0.049). Patients treated with anti-VEGF also had thicker CMT than the observation group (p = 0.013), and experienced better changes in CMT than the observation, as well as laser photocoagulation groups (p = 0.005; p = 0.047).ConclusionObservation, anti-VEGF, and laser photocoagulation are effective therapeutic methods for the management of RAM, and anti-VEGF therapy is intended to better improve patients with severe VA and CMT.

Antivascular endothelial growth factor for macular oedema secondary to retinal vein occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PurposeTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents in treating macular oedema due to retinal vein occlusion (RVO-ME).MethodsStudies of randomised controlled trials were searched in...

LONG-TERM EFFECTS OF ANTI-VEGF MONOTHERAPY FOR RETINOPATHY OF PREMATURITY ON THE RETINAL AND REFRACTIVE DEVELOPMENT OF EYE

To evaluate vascular maturation of retina, axial, refractive, and foveal development after anti-VEGF treatment including bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and aflibercept in infants with treatment requiring retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in long term. This retrospective chart review study included children with a history of any anti-VEGF monotherapy for ROP in Zone 1 or posterior Zone 2 who have reached at least 24 months of corrected age. The records of ophthalmologic examination including strabismus evaluation, visual acuity measurement, refractive and axial measurements, optical coherence tomography, and fundus fluorescein angiography examinations with RetCam III were reviewed. A total of 36 eyes of 18 children met the inclusion criteria. The mean gestational age at birth was 27.8 2.13 (23-30) weeks, and ocular assessments were performed between 33 and 61.5 (mean: 42.58 8.6) months of corrected age. Treatment was with bevacizumab in 10 eyes, with ranibizumab in 14 eyes, and with aflibercept in 12 eyes. The mean spherical equivalent was -0.25 1.82; axial length was 20.81 0.62 mm. There was no significant difference among three anti-VEGF groups regarding the abnormal vascular retinal development ( P = 0.183) or leakage ( P = 0.842) on fluorescein angiography. All the anti-VEGF agents provided similar adequate axial and refractive development as well as similar abnormal vascular development in the peripheral retina. The long-term impact of this abnormally vascularized peripheral retina is a curiosity issue. From this point of view, it is an important need to determine the follow-up period and method after the anti-VEGF treatment for ROP.

Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant Has Better Retinal Perfusion than Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment for Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Five-Year Real-World Study

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to investigate the long-term effect of intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) implant and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injection on macular edema (ME) secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO) in a real-world setting. Methods: The medical records of RVO-ME cases, with intravitreal injections and followed up for at least 5 years, were retrospectively reviewed. Changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) were primary outcomes. Images of fluorescence angiography and swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography were analyzed. Foveal avascular zone (FAZ) metrics and perfusion density at the last visit were also compared between the two treatments. Results: A total of 16 patients were recruited, 8 in the anti-VEGF group and 8 in the DEX group. At the 5th year, the BCVA and the CMT in the DEX group were not different from those in the anti-VEGF group (0.69 ± 0.36 LogMAR vs. 0.57 ± 0.30 LogMAR, p = 0.574; 183.25 ± 97.31 µm vs. 195.38 ± 40.92 µm, p = 0.442). Compared with the anti-VEGF group, the DEX group had higher FAZ circularity index (0.57 ± 0.14 vs. 0.68 ± 0.14, p = 0.130) and higher retinal perfusion density (0.45 ± 0.02 vs. 0.39 ± 0.03, p = 0.001), especially in the deep capillary plexus. Conclusion: DEX implant and anti-VEGF injection had comparative long-term effects on RVO-ME. Compared with the anti-VEGF treatment, the DEX treatment had advantages in maintaining retinal perfusion in patients with RVO.

Comparison of treatment methods for submacular hemorrhage in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: conservative versus active surgical strategy

The optimal treatment of submacular hemorrhage (SMH) following neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) is controversial. This study aimed to compare visual outcomes of conservative versus active surgical treatment. Two hundred thirty-six eyes of 236 patients with SMH (≥ 1 disc diameter) were stratified into four groups: observation (n = 21); anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monotherapy (n = 161); non-surgical gas tamponade (n = 31); and subretinal surgery (n = 23). The primary outcome was best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 12 months. The baseline BCVAs of the observation, anti-VEGF monotherapy, non-surgical gas tamponade, and subretinal surgery groups were 1.50 ± 0.70, 1.09 ± 0.70, 1.31 ± 0.83, and 1.62 ± 0.77 logarithm of minimal angle resolution (LogMAR), respectively. The mean BCVAs at 12 months were 1.39 ± 0.84, 0.90 ± 0.83, 1.35 ± 0.88, and 1.44 ± 0.91 LogMAR, respectively. After adjusting for age, baseline BCVA, SMH size, and the number of intravitreal anti-VEGF injections before SMH, the mean BCVA showed no significant difference among treatments at 12 months (P = 0.204). The anti-VEGF monotherapy group showed better mean BCVA significantly at 3 months (P < 0.001). Only baseline BCVA was associated with VA gain at 12 months (Odds ratio = 3.53, P < 0.001). This study demonstrated that there was no difference in 12 month visual outcomes among treatments and a better early visual outcome can be expected with anti-VEGF monotherapy.

Visual prognosis of submacular hemorrhage secondary to age-related macular degeneration: A retrospective multicenter survey.

PurposeTo investigate the clinical features, treatment options, and visual outcomes of submacular hemorrhage (SMH) secondary to neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).DesignA retrospective, observational case series.MethodsSetting: Multicenter institutional setting. Patient Population: A total of 127 patients (127 eyes; 88 men, 39 women; (mean age, 74.2 years)) diagnosed with AMD-associated SMHs exceeding 2 disc diameters involving the fovea. Observation: The AMD types, previous treatments, treatment options, anatomic findings, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were assessed. Main Outcome Measures: Clinical features, treatment options, and visual outcomes of SMHs secondary to nAMD.ResultsThirty-two eyes had typical AMD, 94 eyes polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV), and one eye retinal angiomatous proliferation. Eighty-five eyes were treatment-naïve; 42 eyes were treated previously: anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy (n = 26), photodynamic therapy (n = 3), and combined therapy (n = 13). Treatment of SMHs included vitrectomy (36 eyes), pneumatic displacement (49 eyes), and anti-VEGF monotherapy (42 eyes). The final BCVA improved significantly in treatment-naïve cases from 0.86 to 0.62 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) unit (Snellen equivalent from 20/145 to 20/83) and from 0.80 to 0.56 (Snellen equivalent from 20/126 to 20/73) in PCV cases. Meanwhile, the BCVA logMAR values improved from 1.15 to 0.75 (Snellen equivalent from 20/283 to 20/112) and from 0.87 to 0.63 (Snellen equivalent from 20/148 to 20/85) in eyes that underwent vitrectomy or pneumatic displacement, respectively. In eyes with BCVAs between 20/133 to 20/40 at SMH onset, the final VA in the pneumatic displacement group was better than in the anti-VEGF monotherapy group. One eye had a retinal detachment and 1 eye had a macular hole in the vitrectomy group, and 5 eyes had a vitreous hemorrhage in the pneumatic displacement group.ConclusionsThe recommended treatment for SMHs secondary to nAMD exceeding 2 disc area and with BCVA below 20/40 is vitrectomy or pneumatic displacement for visual improvement.