Anti-vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Research Articles

Impact of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment on Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration with and without Retinal Pigment Epithelial Detachment: A Real-World Study.

This study evaluates the impact of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment on neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) with and without pigment epithelial detachment (PED) over a one-year period. Conducted at a tertiary referral center in Taiwan, this retrospective analysis included 88 eyes treated with intravitreal aflibercept injections. Patients were categorized into four groups based on the presence or absence of PED at baseline and 12 months post-treatment. Significant reductions in central macular thickness (CMT) and PED height were observed, although no statistical difference was found in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). The presence or type of PED did not negatively impact visual outcomes. Among nAMD patients with persistent PED throughout the first year of anti-VEGF treatment, linear regression analysis showed that mixed-type PED revealed poor final BCVA compared to those with serous PED. The analysis also identified older age and poorer initial BCVA as predictors of less favorable visual outcomes. This study highlights the effectiveness of anti-VEGF therapy in real-world settings and offers insights into factors influencing visual outcomes for nAMD patients with PED.

Clinical characteristics and long-term treatment outcomes of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy with classic type leakage

To investigate long-term treatment outcomes of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) with classic type leakage and to compare the outcomes with those of PCV without classic type leakage. This retrospective study included 153 patients diagnosed with PCV and treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Patients showing classic type leakage on fluorescein angiography were included in the classic type leakage group (N = 40, 26.1%), and those without classic type leakage were included in the occult group (N = 113, 73.9%). The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at baseline and 24 months, changes in BCVA, incidence of fibrosis, and lesion reactivation after initial loading injections were compared between the two groups. There was no significant difference in the baseline BCVA between the classic type leakage group (mean logarithm of minimal angle of resolution 0.67 ± 0.53[Snellen equivalents = 20/93]) and the occult group (0.55 ± 0.49[20/70])(P = 0.639). In addition, the BCVA at 24 months (0.44 ± 0.53[20/55] vs. 0.38 ± 0.41[20/47])(P = 1.000), changes in BCVA (0.22 ± 0.42 improvement[2.2 lines] vs. 0.16 ± 0.36 improvement[1.6 lines]) (P = 0.366), and lesion reactivation (P = 0.787) did not differ between the two groups. The incidence of fibrosis was higher in the classic type leakage group (37.5%) than in the occult group (14.2%) (P = 0.002). Although the incidence of fibrosis was higher in PCVs with classic type leakage, the overall treatments were not significantly different between PCVs with and without classic type leakage. In addition, substantial visual improvement was noted at 24 months, suggesting that PCVs with classic type leakage can be effectively treated with anti-VEGF therapy.

Successful treatments of idiopathic retinal vasculitis, aneurysms, and neuroretinitis (IRVAN) syndrome-related macular edema and exudation by intravitreal aflibercept injection in a senile patient: A case report.

The prevalence of idiopathic retinitis, vasculitis, aneurysms, and neuroretinitis (IRVAN) syndrome is <1/1,000,000, and it tends to occur in young women. Panretinal photocoagulation, focal laser photocoagulation, peripheral cryopexy, vitrectomy, and corticosteroid therapy are the traditional treatments. We reported a case of a senile patient with IRVAN syndrome who presented with severe exudation in both eyes and macular edema in the left eye, successfully treated by serial intravitreal aflibercept injections. A 77-year-old Taiwanese woman complained of progressive blurred vision in the left eye and ocular examinations revealed a visual acuity of 20/125 in the left eye. Indirect fundoscopy and fluorescein angiography showed bilateral multiple aneurysms, vasculitis, optic nerve staining, and neovascularizations. In addition, optical coherence tomography demonstrated macular edema with subretinal fluid and exudations in the left eye. Monthly intravitreal injections of antivascular endothelial growth factor with aflibercept 2.0 mg were administered in the left eye. The visual acuity in the left eye improved to 20/50 after 18 months of treatment. Macular edema and subretinal fluid regressed. Furthermore, vessel leakage and optic disc staining also improved. This case is the first to demonstrate successful treatment of IRVAN syndrome-related central macular edema and exudations, in the absence of neovascularization, using a series of intravitreal aflibercept injections as monotherapy.

Eales’ disease with secondary coats’-like reaction: a case report

BackgroundEales’ disease is an idiopathic, inflammatory condition characterized by peripheral retinal phlebitis, distal non-perfusion, and neovascularization. Coats’ disease, on the other hand, is an idiopathic, retinal vasculopathy characterized by telangiectasia and yellowish exudation. Both diseases commonly affect males. Here, we report an atypical case of unilateral Eales’ disease with co-existing, secondary Coats’-like reaction in a 25-year-old male exhibiting unilateral retinal telangiectasia accompanied by subtle macular edema, extensive peripheral vascular sheathing, and distal non-perfusion in the absence of clinically visible exudation.MethodsCase report.ResultsA 25-year-old male presented with painless blurring of vision in the right eye for two months. Best-corrected Snellen visual acuity was 3/60 in the affected eye, with relative afferent pupillary defect observed, and 6/9 contralaterally. Anterior segment examination was unremarkable. Right eye fundoscopy showed aneurysmal telangiectasia at the macula, 360 degrees perivascular sheathing and telangiectasia of peripheral retinal vessels. There was no exudation, neovascularization, tractional membranes, vitritis, retinitis, and choroiditis. Left eye fundus was unremarkable. Optical coherence tomography of the macula revealed disorganization and thinning of the inner retinal layers with minimal intraretinal fluid. Fundus fluorescein angiography showed leakage from the aneurysms but not from the sheathed vessels, and an enlarged foveolar avascular zone. A well-defined zone of non-perfusion and retinal vascular telangiectasia with shunts was observed. Blood investigations ruled out metabolic, infectious, haematological, and autoimmune causes. Carotid Doppler showed no stenosis, and CT angiography of the brain did not show any vascular abnormalities. In view that no cause was identified, a diagnosis of Eales’ disease with secondary Coats’-like reaction was made. Treatment consisted of FFA-guided laser photocoagulation to the areas of non-perfusion. Intavitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injection was not done in view of poor visual prognosis. The condition and visual acuity remained stable during 18 months of follow-up.ConclusionThis report highlights an atypical case of Eales’ disease with co-existing, secondary Coats’-like reaction.

A cost-minimization analysis of anti-VEGFs for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration in the Netherlands.

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the main cause of severe vision loss globally. Neovascular AMD (nAMD) is an advanced stage of AMD treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGFs). Although anti-VEGF treatment is effective, the frequent intravitreal injections place a burden on patients, (in)formal caregivers, and clinics. This study assesses the health-economic impact of anti-VEGF agents with lower injection frequency that have the potential to reduce treatment burden and compares it to the standard of care. We developed a cost-minimization model to evaluate the direct medical costs associated with first-line unilateral anti-VEGF treatment across a 3-year time horizon in the Netherlands. The analysis compared aflibercept 8mg, aflibercept 2mg, bevacizumab, faricimab, and ranibizumab. Our model adopted a treat-and-extend (T&E) regimen for aflibercept 2mg, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab. For aflibercept 8mg, a flexible regimen that was extendable up to 24weeks was applied, while faricimab followed a flexible regimen that was extendable up to 16weeks. Additionally, since list prices may vary from net prices, we calculated the break-even price for each anti-VEGF in comparison to bevacizumab, which is the recommended first-line treatment due to its low medication price. Based on list prices, aflibercept 8mg led to the lowest treatment costs (€16,251 per patient over a 3-year time horizon), closely followed by bevacizumab (€17,616 per patient over a 3-year time horizon). Ranibizumab led to the highest per-patient costs (€31,746 over a 3-year time horizon). For bevacizumab, most costs were attributable to administration, while for the other anti-VEGFs, most were attributable to medication. Aflibercept 8mg is cost-saving compared to bevacizumab at their medication prices at the time of writing. Aflibercept 2mg, faricimab, and ranibizumab should be priced below €488, €591, and €75, respectively. To be cost-equal to bevacizumab with current list prices, anti-VEGFs should be administered with a maximum of 12.7 to 13.8 injections over a 3-year time horizon. According to the injection frequency observed in clinical trials, aflibercept 8mg would be the anti-VEGF that generates the lowest per-patient healthcare costs for the treatment of nAMD in the Netherlands after a treatment period of three years. Our study indicates that anti-VEGF drugs with a lower injection frequency might provide a cost-saving solution to the increasing burden of anti-VEGF treatment on the healthcare system.

Evaluation of the effect of vitreomacular interface disorders on anti-VEGF treatment in patients with diabetic macular edema in real life: MARMASIA study group report No. 10.

The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of vitreomacular interface disorders (VMID) on treatment response in patients treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) due to diabetic macular edema (DME). Three hundred seventy-seven eyes of 239 patients in the MARMASIA Study Group who received intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment (IVT) due to DME were included in the study. The group 1 consisted of 44 eyes of the patients who had not received any treatment before, were followed up regularly for 24months after at least a 3-month loading dose, and suffered from VMID such as epiretinal membrane, vitreomacular adhesion or traction, and lamellar hole. The group 2 consisted of 333 eyes of the patients without VMID. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) of the patients at baseline, 3rd month, 6th month, 1st year and 2nd year follow-ups were measured. The mean age of the Groups 1 and 2 was 67.1 ± 11.3 and 61.9 ± 10.2 years, respectively. 61.3% of the group 1 and 58.8% of the group 2 were female (p > 0.05). The duration of diabetes was 19.2 ± 3.7 and 15.8 ± 3.2 years, respectively, and the number of follow-ups was 16.09 ± 4.68 and 12.06 ± 4.58, respectively in the groups (p < 0.001, 0.001, respectively). The number of IVT was 7.13 ± 2.71 and 7.20 ± 2.22, respectively in the groups 1 and 2 and no statistically significant difference was observed between them (p = 0.860). According to logMAR, BCVA values at baseline were 0.63 ± 0.24 and 0.59 ± 0.26 (p = 0.29), respectively, in the groups and the amount of change in BCVA at the end of the 2nd year was -0.02 ± 0.48 in the group 1 and -0.12 ± 0.48 in the group 2. It was observed as 0.48 (p = 0.13). Although the increase in BCVA was greater at all follow-ups in the group 2 compared to their initial examination, no significant difference was observed between the groups in terms of BCVA change. The CMT values of the groups at baseline were 442.5 ± 131.3µm and 590.9 ± 170.6µm, respectively (p = 0.03) The decrease in CMT after IVT was significantly greater in the group 2 at all follow-ups when compared to the first group (p < 0.05). While the presence of VMID in DME patients receiving IVT did not affect visual results, it negatively affected the anatomical response and macular edema morphology. The presence of VMID at baseline affected the success of IVT. It should be taken into consideration that VMID may resolve spontaneously or with IVT, and new cases of VMID may occur in patients during the treatment process.

Quantitative Evaluation of Type 1 and Type 2 Choroidal Neovascularization Components Under Treatment With Projection-Resolved OCT Angiography.

To evaluate the response of type 1 and type 2 macular neovascularization (MNV) components under anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment in age-related macular degeneration (AMD) using projection-resolved optical coherence tomography angiography (PR-OCTA). This retrospective study included eyes with treatment-naïve exudative AMD treated with anti-VEGF injections under a pro re nata (PRN) protocol over 1 year. Two-dimensional MNV areas and three-dimensional MNV volumes were derived from macular PR-OCTA scans using an automated convolutional neural network. MNV was detected as flow signal within the outer retinal slab. Type 1 components and type 2 components were analyzed separately. Of 17 enrolled eyes, 12 eyes were pure type 1 MNV and five eyes were type 2 MNV. In eyes with pure type 1, the total (sum of type 1 and type 2 components) MNV area and volume did not change from baseline to 6 months or 12 months (P > 0.05). In eyes with type 2 MNV, the total MNV area significantly decreased from the baseline to 6 months (P = 0.0074) and 12 months (P = 0.014). The total type 2 MNV volume also decreased from baseline visit to visits at 6 months and at 12 months, nearing statistical signifiicance (P = 0.061 and P = 0.074). In eyes with type 2 MNV, the type 1 component increased from 0.093 mm2 to 0.30 mm2 (P = 0.058), and the type 2 component decreased from 0.37 mm2 at 6 months to 0 at 12 months (P = 0.0087). Type 1 and type 2 MNV may have different response under PRN anti-VEGF treatment over 1 year.

Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant in Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Pretreated Diabetic Macular Edema-A Swiss Cohort Study.

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a significant cause of visual impairment, often treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents. However, some patients do not respond adequately to this treatment. This study aims to evaluate the contribution of the intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) implant as a second-line treatment in DME patients with insufficient response to anti-VEGF therapy or with high treatment burden. This retrospective multicenter cohort study was conducted across seven clinical sites in Switzerland. The study included eyes with active DME that had been pretreated with anti-VEGF for at least six months before receiving DEX therapy. Data were extracted from electronic patient records, focusing on best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield thickness (CST), and injection frequency. A total of 95 eyes from 89 patients (38.8% females, mean age 65.6 ± 9.1 years, follow-up time 80.6 ± 38.5 [13.5-166.7] months) were analyzed. Prior to the first DEX implant, eyes had undergone an average of 16.0 ± 13.3 anti-VEGF injections over 32.5 ± 22.4 months. Post-DEX treatment, 22.1% of eyes received DEX monotherapy, 44.2% received a combination of DEX and anti-VEGF, 25.3% continued with anti-VEGF monotherapy, and 8.4% received no further treatment. The number of anti-VEGF injections decreased significantly from 6.4 ± 3.1 in the year before DEX to 1.6 ± 2.4 in the year after DEX (p < 0.001). BCVA remained stable (0.4 ± 0.3 logMAR at baseline, 0.4 ± 0.5 logMAR at 24 months, p = 0.2), while CST improved from 477.7 ± 141.0 to 320.4 ± 125.5 μm (p < 0.001), and the presence of retinal fluid decreased from 98.0% to 61.1% (p = 0.021). During follow-up, 26.3% of eyes required glaucoma medication, 4.2% underwent glaucoma surgery, and 1.1% needed cataract surgery. In real-world clinical settings, the addition of DEX to anti-VEGF therapy in DME patients significantly reduces treatment burden and retinal fluid while maintaining visual function. Treatment decisions should balance anatomical and functional outcomes, considering individual patient needs.

Pneumatic displacement of submacular haemorrhage secondary to neovascular age-related macular degeneration and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy.

To compare the visual and anatomical outcomes of pneumatic displacement (PD) combined with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy versus anti-VEGF monotherapy in treatment-naive eyes with submacular haemorrhage (SMH) secondary to neovascular age-related macular degeneration and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. In a retrospective comparative interventional study of 57 eyes, the changes in logMAR visual acuity (VA), and SMH height and area at baseline at months 1, 3 and 12 were compared between the PD and non-PD groups. There was no significant difference in mean VA in the PD versus non-PD group at month 12 (1.1 versus 0.7, p = 0.09). At baseline, the PD group, compared to the non-PD group, had significantly larger SMH area (35.9 versus 26.9 mm2, p = 0.04) and SMH height at the fovea (733.7 versus 503.6 µm, p < 0.01). The greatest reduction in SMH height and area occurred between baseline and month 1 in the PD group, which was faster than between month 1 and month 3 in the non-PD group, with similar findings in the matched pair analysis matched for SMH height and area. In the multivariable analysis, only baseline VA was associated with VA outcomes (month 1: β = -0.46, 95% [confidence interval] CI = -0.78 to -0.14, p = 0.006; month 3: β = -0.52, 95% CI = -0.86 to -0.18, p = 0.004; and month 12: β = -0.78, 95% CI = -1.16 to -0.39, p < 0.001). The visual outcome of SMH at month 12 in nAMD and PCV is poor regardless of whether PD is performed in addition to anti-VEGF therapy, although a more rapid resolution of SMH can be expected.

Attention-Enhanced Guided Multimodal and Semi-Supervised Networks for Visual Acuity (VA) Prediction after Anti-VEGF Therapy

The development of telemedicine technology has provided new avenues for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with DME, especially after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy, and accurate prediction of patients’ visual acuity (VA) is important for optimizing follow-up treatment plans. However, current automated prediction methods often require human intervention and have poor interpretability, making it difficult to be widely applied in telemedicine scenarios. Therefore, an efficient, automated prediction model with good interpretability is urgently needed to improve the treatment outcomes of DME patients in telemedicine settings. In this study, we propose a multimodal algorithm based on a semi-supervised learning framework, which aims to combine optical coherence tomography (OCT) images and clinical data to automatically predict the VA values of patients after anti-VEGF treatment. Our approach first performs retinal segmentation of OCT images via a semi-supervised learning framework, which in turn extracts key biomarkers such as central retinal thickness (CST). Subsequently, these features are combined with the patient’s clinical data and fed into a multimodal learning algorithm for VA prediction. Our model performed well in the Asia Pacific Tele-Ophthalmology Society (APTOS) Big Data Competition, earning fifth place in the overall score and third place in VA prediction accuracy. Retinal segmentation achieved an accuracy of 99.03 ± 0.19% on the HZO dataset. This multimodal algorithmic framework is important in the context of telemedicine, especially for the treatment of DME patients.

Factors Influencing Treatment Preference in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema: A Study Using Conjoint Analysis.

Despite the wide range of treatment options available for diabetic macular edema (DME), adherence to treatment remains a barrier. Therefore, this study used conjoint analysis to examine the factors that patients with DME prioritize when choosing a course of treatment and investigated differences in quality of life and levels of disease self-management in patients with or without experience of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment. A cross-sectional study was conducted through an online survey in Japan between May 31, 2022, and June 30, 2022. Questionnaires were sent to 27,236 individuals registered in the diabetes panels, with experience of treatment for DME within the last 10years. Conjoint analysis was employed to calculate the relative importance, i.e., degree of influence on patients' treatment choices, considering the trade-offs among five factors: cost per treatment, frequency of visits, anticipated post-treatment visual acuity, physician's explanation about disease and treatment, and frequency of treatment-related side effects. A total of 237 responses were used to assess the relative importance of cost per treatment, frequency of visits, anticipated post-treatment visual acuity, physician's explanation about the disease, treatment, and frequency of treatment-related side effects using conjoint analysis. The importance of each factor was anticipated post-treatment visual acuity at 30.0, frequency of treatment-related side effects at 25.5, treatment frequency at 17.7, cost per treatment at 16.5, and physician explanation about the disease and treatment at 10.4. The average EuroQoL 5 dimension 5 level index value in patients with and without anti-VEGF treatment experience was 0.785 and 0.825, respectively, with no major difference. Anticipated post-treatment visual acuity was identified as the most important factor in selecting a treatment regardless of the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment experience demonstrating when patients with DME make treatment choices, anticipated post-treatment visual acuity is prioritized over treatment frequency and cost.

A Nanogel Formulation of Anti-VEGF Peptide for Ocular Neovascularization Treatment.

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is an eye disorder that can lead to visual impairment in elder patients, and current treatments include repeated injections of monoclonal antibody-based antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents. This study investigates the potential of a nanoformulation of a peptide anti-VEGF molecule for neovascular AMD. Anti-VEGF peptide HRHTKQRHTALH (HRH), which has high affinity to VEGF-Fc receptor, was used as the bioactive agent to control neovascularization of the retina. The nanoformulation consisting of hyaluronic acid nanogel was generated by incorporating divinyl sulfone and cholesterol to increase the stability and control the size of the nanodrug. The encapsulation efficacy of nanogel was 65%, and drug release was 34.72% at the end of 192 h. Obtained nanogels were efficiently internalized in 15 min by human umbilical vascular endothelial cells (HUVECs) and ARPE-19 cells, and results indicate that nanoformulation is not toxic to ARPE-19 cells, whereas it inhibits HUVEC proliferation owing to anti-VEGF peptide in the nanogel structure. In the coculture experiment in which retinal penetration was modeled, it was observed that the nanogel reached HUVECs and negatively affected their proliferation without disturbing the monolayer of ARPE-19 cells. In vivo experiments with chick chorioallantoic membrane revealed that nanogel formulation has higher antiangiogenesis activity compared to free HRH. Additionally, in an oxygen-induced retinopathy model, the excessive growth of blood vessels was notably suppressed in mice treated with HRH-loaded nanogel. This research indicates that nanogels formulated in this study are promising candidates as a topical treatment for AMD.

The I-OPTA Questionnaire: A National Assessment of Patients with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) is the leading cause of irreversible vision loss in developed countries. However, a significant gap persists in understanding this population, exacerbated by their advanced age and visual impairments, which can hinder research participation and access to healthcare. The purpose of this study was to describe the content of the questionnaire and the participating patients with nAMD. The survey includes patients diagnosed with nAMD who had previously received treatment or were currently undergoing intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections. Participants were recruited using various methods, as reaching out to patients who are no longer receiving treatment poses a particular challenge. A patient and public advisory board assisted throughout the study period. Of the 713 electronic invitations sent out, 494 (69.3%) patients responded to the questionnaire, with an additional 57 responses obtained through e-mail or telephone interviews. Due to the exclusion of 16 responses, there were a total of 535 valid responses, including 176 from patients previously treated and 359 from those currently undergoing treatment for nAMD. The median age of respondents was 79.9years (interquartile range [IQR] 75.5-84.7), with 59.8% being women. Among them, 53.2% were married, while 43.1% lived alone. Data from the I-OPTA (Identification of Patient-Reported Barriers in Treatment for nAMD) questionnaire allows future exploration of patients who are no longer receiving treatment, patients' knowledge about preventive measures, and the impact of nAMD on visual function and quality of life. Future research, including studies that integrate data from corresponding retinal images and Danish national registers, has the potential to generate invaluable knowledge, providing benefits to both patients and healthcare professionals.

Comparing macular thickness and visual acuity responses retinal vein occlusion versus diabetic macular edema following anti vascular endothelial growth factor therapy: A retrospective analysis

: Vascular growth factor associates Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) and Diabetic Macular Edema (DME). A retrospective analysis using database from a tertiary hospital.: The study aims to evaluate effects of anti-vascular growth factor therapy on patients Diabetic Macular Edema with and retinal vein occlusion,: This study conducted between December 2022 and June 2023 where 30 patients diagnosed with Diabetic macular edema (DME, n=15) or Retinal vein occlusion (RVO, n=15) receiving anti-VEGF were examined. This focused on changes in best corrected visual acuity, central macular thickness and predictors over a period of three months.: Retinal Vein Occlusion (RVO) patients exhibited a more significant improvement in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) compared to Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) (25 vs. 10 letters, p = 0.006) after three months. The change in Central Macular Thickness (CMT) also favored RVO (100µm) over DME (40µm, p = 0.012). Final BCVA median was 70 for DME and 65 for RVO (p = 0.461). Considering initial BCVA and CMT, RVO predicted better visual enhancement than DME.: RVO exhibited major BCVA improvement at three months with Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor. Final vision was indistinguishable for DME and RVO. Anti VEGF stabilizes DME vision. Despite the improvement, early RVO diagnosis and treatment may enhance final vision.

Bevacizumab First in DRCR Protocol AC vs Real-World Physician Treatment Choice for Diabetic Macular Edema: Two-Year Cost Analysis.

Purpose: To compare the modeled costs of the Protocol AC bevacizumab-first treatment protocol (with a switch to aflibercept for sub-responders) with real-world costs for treatment-naïve patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) over a 2-year period. Methods: Published data from the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network (DRCR) Protocol AC bevacizumab-first arm (154 eyes) were used to model 2-year treatment costs. Real-world costs were modeled using data from the Vestrum Health electronic medical records database from a 2016 to 2018 cohort of treatment-naïve eyes with DME (n = 1062) treated with antivascular endothelial growth factor monotherapy. The visual acuity (VA) before treatment in the real-world cohort was matched to Protocol AC. A secondary cost analysis further matched VA gains after treatment in the real-world cohort (n = 346) to Protocol AC. Results: In Protocol AC, the modeled 2-year DME treatment cost in the bevacizumab-first arm was $18,952, with a mean of 16.1 injections over 22.5 visits and 70% of eyes being switched to aflibercept by year 2. (Within 2 years, 57% of injections were bevacizumab and 43% were aflibercept.) Over the same period, the modeled 2-year real-world cost ($11,459) was 40% lower, with a mean of 8.6 injections over 13.8 visits (42% bevacizumab, 45% aflibercept, 13% ranibizumab). Even when matched for baseline VA and a 14-letter VA gain over 2 years, the real-world cost ($15,394) was still 19% lower than the modeled cost in the Protocol AC bevacizumab-first arm. Conclusions: The real-world cost of treating DME over 2 years was significantly lower than the Protocol AC bevacizumab-first cost. Application of Protocol AC findings into real-world utilization, as with step therapy mandates, should only be considered if the same intensive protocol could be followed. These data suggest that existing real-world costs that reflect physician choice are already significantly lower than protocol-mandated step therapy, even when controlling for similar VA outcomes.

Multi-target and natural product-based multi-drug approach for anti-VEGF resistance in glioblastoma

Glioblastoma (GBM) remains a formidable challenge in neuro-oncology due to its aggressive nature and propensity for therapeutic resistance. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapies, although promising, often encounter resistance that limits their clinical efficacy. A multi-target and multi-drug approach has emerged as compelling strategies to address this resistance to enhance the treatment outcomes. This review examines the complex environment of anti-VEGF resistant GBM and analyses a multi-target therapeutic approach using natural products.

Laser Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy: History, Mechanism, and Novel Technologies.

Background: Diabetic retinopathy (DR), as a complication of diabetes mellitus (DM), remains a significant contributor to preventable vision impairment in the working-age population. Laser photocoagulation is essential in treating DR in conjunction with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injection, steroids, and vitrectomy. This review summarizes the history of laser photocoagulation and highlights its current role and long-term effectiveness in real-world conditions. Methods: The National Clinical Trial (NCT), PubMed, Google Scholar, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases were searched utilizing combined or individual keywords, and a total of 121 articles were reviewed by the authors. Results: Several novel laser photocoagulation technologies, such as patterned scanning laser, subthreshold micropulse laser, navigated laser, multimodal imaging-guided laser, and retina rejuvenation therapy, substantially decrease the adverse effects and improve the accuracy and security of laser therapy. Numerous studies have demonstrated the outstanding clinical efficacy of combination therapies with pharmacologic treatments like anti-VEGF in treating DR and diabetic macular edema (DME). A 20-year follow-up retrospective study in our center preliminarily demonstrated the long-term effectiveness of conventional laser photocoagulation. Conclusions: More clinical trials are required to confirm the clinical effectiveness of novel laser technologies. Better treatment protocols for the combination therapy may be detailed. Anti-VEGF treatment has better effects, especially for DME and in a short period. But in real-world conditions, given the long-term effectiveness and economic advantages of conventional laser treatment, it should be prioritized over anti-VEGF injection in certain situations.

Two-year efficacy and safety of different anti-vascular endothelial growth factor regimens for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

To compare the 2-year efficacy and safety of various anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) regimens for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). A comprehensive search was performed on multiple electronic databases up to April 2023 and updated in June 2024, to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Key outcomes included the proportion of patients achieving a vision gain of ≥15 letters and maintaining stable vision (loss of <15 letters) in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), changes in mean BCVA from baseline, serious ocular adverse events (SAEs), adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation and any cause of death at 2 years. Nineteen trials with 12,654 patients and 25 treatment regimens were analyzed in the study. All anti-VEGF regimens showed superior efficacy compared to sham therapy. Specifically, faricimab 6 mg (4+up to Q16W) and ranibizumab 0.5 mg (2-week T&E) displayed top-level effect in vision gain. Bevacizumab 1.25 mg (2-week T&E) and aflibercept 2 mg (2-week T&E) demonstrated the most stable vision outcomes. Bevacizumab 1.25 mg (2-week T&E) and ranibizumab 0.5 mg (2-week T&E) exhibited the most pronounced mean BCVA improvement. Compared to sham therapy, the risk of SAEs was significantly higher for brolucizumab 6 mg (3 + Q12W/ Q8W) (RR = 6.04, 95% CI: 1.30-28.02) and PDS 100 mg/ml (Q24W) (RR = 10.95, 95% CI: 2.14-56.02), but not for other anti-VEGF regimens. Ranibizumab 0.5 mg (2-week T&E) emerges as a potentially optimal regimen for nAMD over a 2-year period. Future studies need to consider the impact of baseline characteristics on treatment outcomes.

Pharmacokinetics of intravitreal anti-VEGF drugs in vitrectomized eyes

Neovascular retinal diseases pose a significant burden, often resulting in visual impairment. Intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs serves as the primary therapeutic approach. Nonetheless, certain patients necessitate continued anti-VEGF treatment post-vitrectomy or other ocular surgeries. Emerging evidence suggests that variations in surgical techniques and postoperative vitreous cavity management may induce distinct intraocular pharmacokinetics (PK) of anti-VEGF agents following vitrectomy, prompting potential adjustments in therapeutic strategies. This review offers a thorough examination of the pharmacokinetic determinants impacting anti-VEGF drugs and their intraocular dynamics post-vitrectomy.

Bedside bilateral sequential intravitreal anti-VEGF injections for retinopathy of prematurity.

To evaluate the outcome and ocular adverse events of bedside bilateral sequential intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) (BBSIR). This retrospective interventional study included infants who received BBSIR with a follow-up of at least 1 month. Clinical history, intravitreal injection details, indications, intraoperative and postoperative ocular adverse events, and outcomes were analyzed. The study cohort included 192 babies (384 eyes) spread over 9 years. The mean gestational age was 30.2 ± 2.6 weeks (28.8-34.1), and the birth weight was 1098.11 ± 271.65 g (650-2000). The indications for BBSIR were as follows: 73.4% (n = 141 infants) were too sick to transfer to an ophthalmic unit, 10.9% (n = 21 infants) due to the parents' inconvenience of traveling to the ophthalmic center, and 15. 6% (n = 30 infants) due to both reasons. The injections were given by an ROP specialist/ROP-trained ophthalmologist after due parental consent, considering each eye as a fresh eye with separate scrubbing and draping. Light from the head-worn indirect ophthalmoscope served as the source of illumination. The retinopathy was regressing/regressed in 92.4% of babies until the last follow-up. The major ocular complication was cataract in 2 eyes (0.5%). There was no incidence of endophthalmitis till last follow-up (median 5.7 months). As per this study, BBSIR was observed to be effective and safe if given by those fully trained in the management of ROP. Though the rate of complications like cataract is small, they can pose management challenges and impact vision in a growing child.